ontario ministry of the environment - record of site condition # … 213927.pdf · 2014-11-21 ·...

Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # 213927

Record of Site Condition

Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has

access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings

with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental

condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from

the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been

submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment.

Record of Site Condition Number 213927Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2014/08/01Certification Date 2014/06/24Current Property Use CommercialIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,

with Potable Ground Water, Coarse TexturedSoil, for Residential property use

Property Municipal Address 376 BLAKE STREET, BARRIE, ON, L4M 1L3

1 of 16Filed Record of Site Condition # 213927 on 2014/08/01

PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS

Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC

Owner Name 2006536 ONTARIO INC.

Authorized Person JOESPH L. SANTOS

Mailing Address UNIT 5, 190 MINET'S POINT ROAD, BARRIEONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code L4N 8J8

Phone (416) 315-4579

Fax

Email Address [email protected]


RSC Property Location Information

Municipal Address(es) 376 BLAKE STREET, BARRIE, ON L4M 1L3

Municipality Barrie

Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter

Assessment Roll Number(s)

4342011002008000000

Property Identifier Number(s)

58848-0054 (LT)

RSC Property Geographical References

Coordinate System UTM

Datum NAD 83

Zone 17

Easting 607,238.40

Northing 4,917,082.70

RSC Property Use Information

The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.

Current Property Use Commercial

Intended Property Use Residential

Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA

No


Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank


PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information

Name MACKENZIE KENT MALCOLM

Type of Licence Under Professional Engineers Act

Licence

Licence Number 28760502

QP Employer Name GEOSPEC ENGINEERING LTD.

Mailing Address 10, 287 TIFFIN STREET, BARRIEONTARIO, L4N 7R8 CANADA

Phone (705) 722-4638

Fax (705) 722-4958

Email Address [email protected]

Municipal Information

Local or Single-Tier Municipality

Barrie

Ministry of the Environment District Office

District Office Barrie District Office

District Office Address 54 Cedar Pointe Dr., Unit 1203, Barrie ON L4N 5R7


Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2014/06/24

Type of Report

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)

Author of Report

Name of ConsultingCompany

P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment 2014/06/24 Kent Malcolm GEOSPEC ENGINEERING LTD.

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment


Author of Report


Phase One Environmental Site Assessment 2008/06/09 Kent Malcolm Geospec Engineering Ltd.


Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2014/06/24

Type of Report


Author of Report


P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment 2014/06/24 Kent Malcolm GEOSPEC ENGINEERING LTD.

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).

Author of Report


N/A


Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No

Section 43.1 applies? No

Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/06/24

Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 0.48000

Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property

Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property

Soil Texture Coarse

Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? No

Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?

Yes

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?

Yes

Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment

PARACEL LABORATORIES LTD.

Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Potable

Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 2


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 2.12 5

2 Cyanide (CN-) < 0.03 0.051 µg/g

3 Antimony 1.9 7.5 µg/g

4 Arsenic 2.4 18 µg/g

5 Barium 44.8 390 µg/g

6 Beryllium < 1 4 µg/g

7 Boron (total) 5.3 120 µg/g

8 Cadmium < 0.5 1.2 µg/g

9 Chromium Total 11.1 160 µg/g

10 Cobalt 4.8 22 µg/g

11 Copper 9 140 µg/g

12 Lead 47.7 120 µg/g

13 Molybdenum < 1 6.9 µg/g

14 Nickel 7.6 100 µg/g

15 Selenium < 1 2.4 µg/g

16 Silver < 0.5 20 µg/g

17 Thallium < 1 1 µg/g

18 Uranium < 1 23 µg/g

19 Vanadium 24.2 86 µg/g

20 Zinc 28.4 340 µg/g

21 Acetone < 0.5 16 µg/g

22 Benzene < 0.02 0.21 µg/g

23 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 1.5 µg/g

24 Bromoform < 0.05 0.27 µg/g

25 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

26 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

27 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 2.4 µg/g

28 Chloroform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

29 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 2.3 µg/g

30 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 1.2 µg/g



33 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.05 0.47 µg/g

34 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

35 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

36 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.05 1.9 µg/g

37 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.084 µg/g

38 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

39 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g


39 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

40 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 1.1 µg/g

41 Hexane (n) < 0.05 2.8 µg/g

42 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 16 µg/g

43 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 0.75 µg/g

44 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.1 µg/g

45 Styrene < 0.05 0.7 µg/g

46 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.05 0.058 µg/g

47 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

48 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 0.28 µg/g

49 Toluene < 0.05 2.3 µg/g

50 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.05 1.7 µg/g

51 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 0.061 µg/g

52 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 0.38 µg/g

53 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

54 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 3.1 µg/g

55 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 7 55 µg/g

56 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 4 98 µg/g

57 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 76 300 µg/g

58 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 42 2800 µg/g

59 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 16 µg/g

60 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 4 µg/g

61 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.02 µg/g

62 Electrical Conductivity 0.306 0.7 mS/cm

63 Chloroform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

64 Ethylene dibromide < 0.05 0.05 µg/g


Remedial Action and Mitigation

Remediated Soils

Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.

Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)

None

Description of Remediation

Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.

None

Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned

Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0

Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0

Soil Brought to the Property

Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)

0.0


Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures

Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.

None

Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.

None

Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres) 0.0


Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures

Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

None

Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

None

Monitoring or Maintenance

Soil Management Measures

Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

None

Ground Water Management Measures

Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

None

Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary

Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?

No


Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:

A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.

As of 2014/06/24, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.

As of 2014/06/24, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments, and any confirmatory sampling, which included the sampling and analysis of soil, it is not necessary to conduct sampling and analysis of ground water quality for the RSC property to make the certified statement set out in paragraph 3 of section 17 of Schedule A.

As of 2014/06/24, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 36 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.

As of 2014/06/24, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.

The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.

I do not hold and have not held and my employer GEOSPEC ENGINEERING LTD.does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based

To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2014/06/24.

By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, MACKENZIE KENT MALCOLM, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2014/06/24:

a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.

I Agree


Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment as part of the record of site condition

Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner

Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired

A Current plan of Survey

Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model

Owner or agent certification statements

v 4.1.1


Record of Site Condition Filing 43172972

376 Blake Street, Barrie, Ontario

Project # 14-1816

“TABLE OF AREA OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN” (Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04)

Area of

Potential

Environmental

Concern

Location of Area of

Potential

Environmental

Concern on Phase

One Property

Potentially

Contaminating

Activity

Location of

PCA (on-site or

off-site)

Contaminants of

Potential Environmental

Concern

Media Potentially Impacted

(Ground water, soil, and/or

sediment)

1

Majority of site

except 2-5m band

along the west and

north property line

(30) Importation

of Fill Material

of Unknown

Quality

On-Site

SAR, Electrical

Conductivity, CN, pH,

Metals, VOCs, PHCs,

BTEX

Soil

Record of Site Condition Filing 43172972

376 Blake Street, Barrie, Ontario

Project # 14-1816

“TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY” (Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04)

Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use

Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire

Insurance Plans, Etc.

Prior 1843 Crown

Vacant Agricultural or

other use

No PCAs or APECs were identified from the sources

researched (Land title search).

1843 to 1861 Francis Hewson

1861 to 1919 Martin Johnson

1919 to 1942 Charles

Robertson Farming

Agricultural use

Listed as Agricultural as per Aerial Photographs No PCAs or APECs were identified from the sources

researched (FIPs, land title search and aerial photographs).

1942 to 1956

William Robertson

1956 to 1957 George Williams

Bowling Alley

Commercial use

Listed as Commercial as per Aerial Photographs Site graded fill of unknown origin was identified as

an APEC

1957 to 1970 Charles Cohan &

Arthur Love

1970 to 2008 Kempview Bowl Limited 2008 to 2013

2013 to present 2006536

Ontario Inc.

Vacant – site building has been

demolished buildings have

been demolished

An interview with Mr. Joe Santos of 2006536 Ontario Inc. confirmed that the bowling alley has been

demolished in preparation for future re-development

ENGINEERING LTD. 287 Tiffin Street, Unit 10, Barrie, Ontario L4N 7R8 TEL: (705) 722-4638 FAX: (705) 722-4958

GEOSPEC ENGINEERING LTD. June 18 2006536 Ontario Inc. Record of Site Condition Filing 1

Record of Site Condition Filing

376 Blake Street

Project # 14-1816

Conceptual Site Model

Overview

The site is located on the north side of Blake Street east of Johnson Street near the northeast

limit of the City of Barrie. The municipal address is 376 Blake Street and the site encompasses

less than 0.5 hectare. At the time of the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), dated

December 9, 2013, the subject site included an unoccupied commercial building that formerly

operated as a bowling alley. The site was bounded by a Lion’s Hall dining establishment to the

east, residential townhouse blocks to the west and individual detached residences to the north as

well as across Blake Street to the south.

The City of Barrie confirmed that historically the property had been zoned General Commercial

(C4) according to Zoning By-law #85-950 for a bowling alley. Furthermore, the City of Barrie

building department issued Building Permit No. 56-074 for a bowling alley on the property on

April 17, 1956. The site is currently zoned Residential RM2 (SP-479, H-119) in accordance with

By-law 2009-141. Finally, Building Permit No. 13-3204 was issued on October 28, 2013 for the

building demolition.

Subsequent to the Phase One ESA an Area of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC) was

identified to be the presence of grading fill at the subject site (Schedule D, Table 2, Item 30). The

fill was required for the construction of the former bowling alley and related parking areas that

operated between 1957 & 2013.

Additional Potential Contaminating Activities (PCAs) that have occurred in the study area

include the following:

The Simcoe County District School Board, at the Johnson Street elementary school

located east of the subject site, was identified as a Waste Generator of laboratory

chemicals & residues.

Harold Martin Rent-All Ltd. was also identified as a Waste Generator of petroleum

distillates.

A 1-2 litre transformer leak was noted at 360 Blake Street; however, environmental

impact was not anticipated.

The Schmidt & Shaw Sales & Service vehicle dealership and historic lumber storage yard

located to the east,

Barrie Carwash Ltd. and Brain’s Used Car Sales located to the northeast.

These activities denoted as PCAs are identified on the appended Conceptual Site Model (CSM)

provided as Enclosure N° 1.


The proposed development of the site is intended to include a residential use with the

consequential relocation and/or removal of the existing building and related grading fill (of

unknown origin). Although the fill will be replaced with a controlled engineered fill, a Record of

Site Condition is required. A preliminary Proposed Development Outline is provided as

Enclosure N° 4. The objective of the Phase Two ESA was to further investigate the fill present at

the site. Test pitting was performed to permit both additional observations of the fill and

acquisition of representative fill samples. The test hole locations are shown on the appended

Cross Section Plan (Enclosure N° 2); while a depiction of the soil stratigraphy is presented in the

Cross Section A-A’(Enclosure N° 3).

A review of the MOE water well records established that five domestic wells records were

available within the identified 250 m buffer of the subject site. The wells were drilled to depths

varying between approximately 52 m & 123 m. The wells encountered predominantly clay with

sand & silt seams. Two wells were dry; while the other three noted static water levels at 15 and

28 m below grade.

Our Geotechnical Investigation at the site and our experience in the area has established that the

predominant soil deposit is compact to very dense, silt & sand till. The till could be considered

an aquitard which overlies the aquifer at variable depth. The subsequent Test Pit Investigation

conducted on-site established that a thin surface cover grading fill was present between the

underlying very dense silt & sand till and the 1956 property development, more specifically the

building slab and related asphalt area. Since the till exhibited low permeability the groundwater

was not considered to be at risk and not investigated.

The Phase Two ESA included the analyses of samples for potential impact from the Schedule D,

Table 2, Item 30 fill as well as site vehicle parking activities. Soil samples were acquired in

dedicated sample jars provided by a CALA laboratory in accordance with O. Reg and analysed

for the presence of metals, pH, free cyanide, Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR), Electrical

Conductivity, Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs), Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, Xylene

(BTEX) & Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).

The soil analyses were within MOE Table 2 (Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in

Potable Groundwater Condition) for Residential/Parkland property use for coarse textured soil.

The groundwater analyses were also within the MOE Table 2 Standards for Residential/

Parkland property use.

The CSM is presented as Enclosure 1 and includes the APEC revealed as well as PCAs in the

surrounding buffer area identified.

Site History

Land titles have established that the site was property of the Crown prior to 1843. Private

individuals owned the property between 1843 & 1956. Although title ownership suggests

farming extended back to at least 1919, aerial photography confirmed agricultural farming use

between 1946 & 1956.

City of Barrie building permit records indicate that two permits were issued for the site. A permit

was issued for the construction of the bowling alley in 1956 and a permit for its demolition in


2013. During the construction of the bowling alley building and parking area, fill was brought to

the site for levelling purposes. No record of the fill source was available. Utility trenches extend

north from Blake Street, approximate middle of the property front, to the front of the building

middle, west side. Utility trenches were backfilled with site native material. No visual, tactile or

olfactory evidence of environmental impact was apparent within the test pits excavated into the

fill.

APECs would consequently include those tabulated below.

TABLE OF “AREA OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN” (Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04)

Area of

Potential

Environmental

Concern

Location of Area of

Potential

Environmental

Concern on Phase

One Property

Potentially

Contaminating

Activity

Location of

PCA (on-site or

off-site)

Contaminants of

Potential

Environmental

Concern

Media Potentially

Impacted (Ground

water, soil, and/or

sediment)

1

Majority of site

except 2-5m band

along the west and

north property line

(30) Importation

of Fill Material

of Unknown

Quality

On-Site

SAR, Electrical

Conductivity, CN, pH,

Metals, VOCs, PHCs,

BTEX

Soil

Physical Setting

The localized topography relative to the surrounding area may be described as gently sloping

towards the south southwest with elevations that range from approximately 256 masl to 254 masl

from north to south. The north and west property lines are wooded.

The geology and hydrology of the area were determined by a review of the Ministry of Natural

Resources, Ontario Geological Survey, Map 2441 and Geological Survey of Canada, Map

1228A Geology of Lake Simcoe Area. The site is located in an area that is part of the

Phanerozoic Eon, Paleozoic Era and Middle Ordovician Epoch Trenton and Black River Group

which comprises grey fine grained limestone and minor dolostone. Furthermore, the referenced

mapping indicates regional topography to be gently sloping to the south towards the Kempenfelt

Bay of Lake Simcoe.

Physiographically, the site lies within the West St. Lawrence Lowland and hydrogeologically

within a drainage basin feeding Kempenfelt Bay. Glaciolacustrine erosional deposits comprised

primarily of sand, gravelly sand or sand & gravel characterize the sub soil of the Lowland. The

permeability of these types of soil is typically moderate. However, our experience at eh site and

the general area has established that the shallow soil is comprised of compact to very dense silt

& sand till.

Since the soil in the area exhibits relatively low permeability, surface runoff presumably either

infiltrates or flows into the municipal storm water system via ditches. Nevertheless, it has been


our experience that shallow groundwater flow may be influenced by variations in soil type and

minor fluctuations in topography. The permeability of the shallow silt and till soil is estimated to

be less than 10-5

cm/sec. Bedrock was not encountered during the subsurface investigation.

Bedrock topographic mapping indicates the bedrock is at a depth of approximately 100 m (Elev.

155 m).

Groundwater was not encountered to a depth of 2.9 m.

Comments

The subject site is not considered environmentally sensitive since the site is neither identified as

an area of Natural Significance on the Ministry of Natural Resources heritage website nor

includes soil beyond the pH range prescribed in the O.Reg. 153/04 for surface or subsurface soil.

Furthermore, the site would not be considered a shallow soil property because the average depth

to bedrock is beyond 100 meters and the site is not within 30 meters of a sensitive water body.

As a result, the site may be compared to the Generic Standards.

POTENTIAL CONTAMINATING ACTIVITY (PCA)

1

1POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT

23

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO SITEPCA

SOILSAR, EC, CN, pH, METALS,VOCs, PHCs, BTEX

SAR, EC, CN, pH, METALS,VOCs, PHCs, BTEX

4PHCs, BTEX5

NO - CROSS GRADIENTMETALS, VOCs

PHCs, BTEX

SAR, EC, CN, pH, METALS,VOCs, PHCs, BTEX

AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTALCONCERN (APEC)

1POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT MEDIAAPEC

NO - CROSS GRADIENT

NO - CROSS GRADIENT

NO - CROSS GRADIENT

NO - CROSS GRADIENT

PROJECT NUMBER

14 - 1816

DRAWN

A.R.Z.

ENCLOSURE

1

K.M.CHECKED

DATE JUNE 17, 2014

SCALE1/ 3000

2006536 ONTARIO INC.CLIENT

CONCEPTUAL SITE MODELTITLE

376 BLAKE STREET,BARRIE

PROJECT NAME

NOTES

LEGEND

WELL DISTANCESITE LOCATION

GENERAL COMMERCIAL

RESIDENTIAL

INSTITUTIONAL

OPEN SPACE

INFERRED GROUNDWATERFLOW

250M OFFSET

WELL

APEC

TEST PIT

PROPERTY LINE

BENCHMARK

ASPHALT

GRANULAR

SILT & SAND TILL

SAND SOME GRAVELFILL

BASE PLAN PROVIDED BY PINESTONE ENGINEERING LTD. IN JUNE 23, 2014.