ontario ministry of the environment and climate change ... 217028.pdf · ontario ministry of the...

Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 217028

Record of Site Condition

Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has

access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings

with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental

condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from

the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been

submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.

Record of Site Condition Number 217028Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/02/27Certification Date 2012/11/30Current Property Use Agricultural/OtherIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,

with Non-potable Ground Water, CoarseTextured Soil, for Residential property use

Property Municipal Address No Municipal Address, Brampton

1 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27

PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS

Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC

Owner Name 1692310 ONTARIO LIMITED

Authorized Person JACK EISENBERGER

Mailing Address 501, 5400 YONGE STREET, TORONTO ONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code M2N 5R5

Phone (416) 227-9005

Fax (416) 227-9007

Email Address [email protected]


RSC Property Location Information

Municipal Address(es) No Municipal Address

Municipality Brampton

Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter

Assessment Roll Number(s)

10080011127540000

Property Identifier Number(s)

14086-0086 (LT)

RSC Property Geographical References

Coordinate System UTM

Datum NAD 83

Zone 17

Easting 599,483.75

Northing 4,833,468.95

RSC Property Use Information

The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.

Current Property Use Agricultural/Other

Intended Property Use Residential

Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA

No


Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank


PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information

Name SHAMA M. QURESHI

Type of Licence Under Professional Engineers Act

Licence

Licence Number 100067344

QP Employer Name TERRAPROBE INC.

Mailing Address 11 INDELL LANE, BRAMPTONONTARIO, L6T 3Y3 CANADA

Phone (905) 796-2650

Fax (905) 796-2250

Email Address [email protected]

Municipal Information

Local or Single-Tier Municipality

Brampton

Upper-Tier Municipality Peel

Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office

District Office Halton-Peel District Office

District Office Address 4145 North Service Road, Suite 300, Burlington ON L7L 6A3


Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2014-11-03

Type of Report

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)

Author of Report

Name of ConsultingCompany

P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Residential Subdivision CVSP Block 6 Altone West Brampton Ontario

2013-01-03 Shama Qureshi and Shafi Andseta

TERRAPROBE INC.

P1 ESA Update

Phase One ESA Update Proposed Residential Subdivision CVSP Block 6 Altone West Brampton Ontario


TERRAPROBE INC.

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment


Author of Report


N/A


Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2014-11-13

Type of Report


Author of Report


P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Residential Subdivision CVSP Block 6 Altone West Brampton Ontario


TERRAPROBE INC.

P2 ESA Update

Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Update Proposed Residential Subdivision CVSP Block 6 Altone West Brampton Ontario


TERRAPROBE INC

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).

Author of Report


N/A


Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No

Section 43.1 applies? No

Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2012/11/30

Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 4.89670

Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property

Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property

Soil Texture Coarse

Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes

Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?

Yes

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?

Yes

Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment

AGAT LABORATORIES

Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Non-potable

Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 3

Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2014/11/03

Upper-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2014/11/03


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* 0.14 1.5 µg/g

2 Chromium VI < 0.2 8 µg/g

3 Cyanide (CN-) < 0.04 0.051 µg/g

4 Electrical Conductivity 0.19 0.7 mS/cm

5 Mercury < 0.1 0.27 µg/g

6 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 0.328 5

7 Antimony < 0.8 7.5 µg/g

8 Arsenic 5 18 µg/g

9 Selenium 0.5 2.4 µg/g

10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 5 55 µg/g

11 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 10 98 µg/g



14 Acenaphthene < 0.05 7.9 µg/g

15 Acenaphthylene < 0.05 0.15 µg/g

16 Anthracene < 0.05 0.67 µg/g

17 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.05 0.5 µg/g

18 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.05 0.3 µg/g

19 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.78 µg/g

20 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.05 6.6 µg/g

21 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.78 µg/g

22 Chrysene < 0.05 7 µg/g

23 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.05 0.1 µg/g

24 Fluoranthene < 0.05 0.69 µg/g

25 Fluorene < 0.05 62 µg/g

26 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.05 0.38 µg/g

27 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.05 0.99 µg/g

28 Naphthalene < 0.05 0.6 µg/g

29 Phenanthrene < 0.05 6.2 µg/g

30 Pyrene < 0.05 78 µg/g

31 Benzene < 0.02 0.21 µg/g

32 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 2 µg/g

33 Toluene < 0.08 2.3 µg/g

34 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 3.1 µg/g

35 Barium 127 390 µg/g

...Continued on next page


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

Continued from previous page....

ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

36 Beryllium 0.8 4 µg/g

37 Boron (total) 10 120 µg/g

38 Cadmium < 0.5 1.2 µg/g

39 Chromium Total 23 160 µg/g

40 Cobalt 11.6 22 µg/g

41 Copper 32 140 µg/g

42 Lead 13 120 µg/g

43 Molybdenum < 0.5 6.9 µg/g

44 Nickel 24 100 µg/g

45 Silver < 0.2 20 µg/g

46 Thallium < 0.4 1 µg/g

47 Uranium 0.5 23 µg/g

48 Vanadium 31 86 µg/g

49 Zinc 59 340 µg/g


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

1 Acenaphthene < 0.2 600 µg/L

2 Acenaphthylene < 0.2 1.8 µg/L

3 Anthracene < 0.1 2.4 µg/L

4 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.2 4.7 µg/L

5 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.01 0.81 µg/L

6 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.1 0.75 µg/L

7 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.2 0.2 µg/L

8 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.1 0.4 µg/L

9 Chrysene < 0.1 1 µg/L

10 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.2 0.52 µg/L

11 Fluoranthene < 0.2 130 µg/L

12 Fluorene < 0.2 400 µg/L

13 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.2 0.2 µg/L

14 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.2 1800 µg/L

15 Naphthalene < 0.2 1400 µg/L

16 Phenanthrene < 0.1 580 µg/L

17 Pyrene < 0.2 68 µg/L

18 Antimony 1.8 20000 µg/L

19 Arsenic 2.1 1900 µg/L

20 Selenium 11.1 63 µg/L

21 Sodium 55,400 2300000 µg/L

22 Acetone < 1 130000 µg/L

23 Bromomethane < 0.2 5.6 µg/L

24 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.79 µg/L

25 Chlorobenzene < 0.1 630 µg/L

26 Chloroform < 0.2 2.4 µg/L

27 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.1 4600 µg/L



30 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.2 4400 µg/L

31 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.3 320 µg/L

32 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L

33 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.3 1.6 µg/L

34 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L

35 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L




Ground Water


ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

36 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.2 16 µg/L

37 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.3 5.2 µg/L

38 Ethylene dibromide < 0.1 0.25 µg/L

39 Hexane (n) < 0.2 51 µg/L

40 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 1 470000 µg/L

41 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 1 140000 µg/L

42 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.2 190 µg/L

43 Methylene Chloride < 0.3 610 µg/L

44 Styrene < 0.1 1300 µg/L

45 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.1 3.3 µg/L

46 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.1 3.2 µg/L

47 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.2 1.6 µg/L

48 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.3 640 µg/L

49 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.2 4.7 µg/L

50 Trichloroethylene < 0.2 1.6 µg/L

51 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.4 2500 µg/L

52 Vinyl Chloride < 0.17 0.5 µg/L

53 Chloride 228,000 2300000 µg/L

54 Chromium VI < 5 140 µg/L

55 Cyanide (CN-) < 2 66 µg/L

56 Mercury < 0.02 0.29 µg/L

57 Barium 126 29000 µg/L

58 Beryllium < 0.5 67 µg/L

59 Boron (total) 133 45000 µg/L

60 Cadmium < 0.2 2.7 µg/L

61 Chromium Total < 2 810 µg/L

62 Cobalt 4.8 66 µg/L

63 Copper 13 87 µg/L

64 Lead < 0.5 25 µg/L

65 Molybdenum 21.9 9200 µg/L

66 Nickel 14.8 490 µg/L

67 Silver < 0.2 1.5 µg/L

68 Thallium < 0.3 510 µg/L

69 Uranium 17 420 µg/L

70 Vanadium 0.9 250 µg/L




Ground Water


ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

71 Zinc < 5 1100 µg/L

72 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 750 µg/L

73 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L



76 Benzene < 0.2 44 µg/L

77 Ethylbenzene < 0.2 2300 µg/L

78 Toluene < 0.1 18000 µg/L

79 Xylene Mixture < 0.2 4200 µg/L


Remedial Action and Mitigation

Remediated Soils

Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.

Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)

None 0.0

Description of Remediation

Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.

No Contaminants of concern found at the property exceeding the applicable standards. Hence no remediation was required.

Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned

Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0

Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0

Soil Brought to the Property

Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)

0.0


Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures

Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.

None

Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.

None

Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres) 0.0


Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures

Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

None

Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

None

Monitoring or Maintenance

Soil Management Measures

Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

None

Ground Water Management Measures

Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

None

Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary

Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?

No


Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:

A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.

As of 2012/11/30, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.

Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located.

As of 2012/11/30, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.

As of 2012/11/30, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.

The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.

I do not hold and have not held and my employer TERRAPROBE INC.does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based

To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSCare true as of 2012/11/30.

By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, SHAMA M. QURESHI, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/02/24:

a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.

I Agree


Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Changeas part of the record of site condition

Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner

Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired

A Current plan of Survey

Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model

Owner or agent certification statements

5.2.6


Request ID: 017367184 Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2015/02/26 Demande n° : Province de l'Ontario Document produit le : Transaction ID: 56879179 Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 15:53:23 Transaction n° : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à : Category ID: CT Catégorie :

CERTIFICATE OF STATUS ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE

This is to certify that according to the D'après les dossiers du Ministère des records of the Ministry of Government Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons Services que la société

1 6 9 2 3 1 0 O N T A R I O L I M I T E D

Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario) 0 0 1 6 9 2 3 1 0 is a corporation incorporated, est une société constituée, prorogée ou née amalgamated or continued under d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la the laws of the Province of Ontario. Province de l'Ontario.

The corporation came into existence on La société a été fondée le M A R C H 2 0 M A R S , 2 0 0 6 and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute.

Dated Fait le F E B R U A R Y 2 6 F É V R I E R , 2 0 1 5

Director Directeur

The issuance of this certificate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services.La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.

MINDEN MINDENGROSSLLP

BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS

GROSS LU’145 KJNG flEET WEST, SUITE 2200

TORONTO, ON, CANADA M5H 402

TEL 416.362.3711 FAX 416.864.9223

www.rnindengross.com

DIRECTDIAL (416)369-4113

E-MAIL dkutnermindengross.com

FILE NUMBER 4044866

January 7,2015

The DirectorEnvironmental Approvals Access

and Service Integration BranchOntario Ministry of the Environment2 St. Clair Avenue WestFloor 12AToronto, OntarioM4V 1L5

Dear Sirs:

Re: Record of Site ConditionRegistered Owner: 1692310 Ontario LimitedProperty: Part of Lot 2, Concession 3 WHS designated as Part I, Plan 43R-20801

City of Brampton

We are the solicitors for 1692310 Ontario Limited and have been requested to provide the followinginformation:

Municipal Address

Not available

Legal Description

PN 14086-0086 (LT)

Parcel 2-1, Section 43-Ching-3 (W.H.S.); Part of Lot 2, Concession 3, West of Hurontario Street,Township of Chinguacousy, designated as Part 1, Plan 43R-2080 1, City of Brampton

TIT MERITAS LAW FIRMS WORLDWFDL

F Page 2

MINDENGROSS LLPJ

Registered Owner

1692310 Ontario Limited

Authorized Signatory

Jack Eisenberger, President of 1692310 Ontario Limited, is an authorized signatory in connection withthe execution of documents required to be executed on behalf of 1692310 Ontario Limited in connectionwith this matter.

Nature of Owner’s Interest

Fee Simple Absolute

Assessment Roll Number

10-08-0-011-12754-0000

Should you require anything further, please do not hesitate to contact the writer.

Yours truly,

MINDEN GROSS LLP

David M. Kutner*DMKJrI

on behalf of DAVID M. KUTNER PROFESSIONAL CoRv0RATI0N

#2012895 v2 I 4044866

LRO #43 Transfer Receipted as PR1242625 on 20070417 at 14:11

The applicant(s) hereby applies to the Land Registrar. yyyy mm dd Page 1 of 2

fr’roperties

PIN 14086 - 0086 LT Interest/Estate Fee Simple

Description PCL 2-1. SEC 43-CHING-3 (W.H.Sj; PT LT 2, CON 3 WEST OF HURONTARIO STTOWNSHIP OF CHINGUACOUSY. PT 1. 43R20801: TM PTh 3 & 6, 43R20801 AS INCH22873; TIW PTS 4 & 5, 43R20801 AS IN 01433625; BRAMPTON

Address BRAMPTON

IconsideraUonConsideration S 0.00

Transferor(s)The transferor(s) hereby transfers the land to the transferee(s).

Name ALTONE INVESTMEPffS LIMITED

Address (or Service 3625 Dufferin StreetSuite 500Toronto, OntarioM3K 1N4

I. MARK MANDELBAUM, Authorized Signing Officer, have the authority to bind the corporation.

This document is not authorized under Power or Attorney by this party.

Transferee(s) Capacity Share

Name 1692310 ONTARIO LIMITED

Address for Service2430 Deer Run AvenueOakville, OntarioL6J 61(9

STATEMENT OF THE TRANSFEROR(S): The transferor(s) verifies that to the best of the transferors knowledge and belief, thistransfer does not contravene the Planning Act

STATEMENT OF THE SOLICITOR FOR THE TRANSFEROR (5): I have explained the effect of the Planning Act to the transferofls)and have made Inquiries of the transferor(s) to determine that this transfer does not contravene that Act and based on theInformation supplied by the transferor(s), to the best of my knowledge and belief, this transfer does not contravene that Act I am anOntano solicitor in good standing.

STATEMENT OF THE SOLICITOR FOR THE TRANSFEREE(S): I have Investigated the title to this land and to abutting land whererelevant and I am satisfied that the title records reveal no contravention as set out In the Planning Act, and to the best of myknowledge and belief this transfer does not contravene the Planning Act. I act Independently of the solicitor for the transferor(s) and Iam an Ontano solicItor in good standing.

j Signed By

David Michael Kutner 145 KIng Street West Suite 2200 acting forTransferor(s) Signed 20070416Toronto MSH 2G5

Tel 4163623711

Fax 4168549223

Joseph John Peter O’Donoghue 555160 Mono-Amaranth Town Line acting forTransferee(s) Signed 2006 1026Sheibume LON 155

Tel 5199251599

Fax 5199259028

Isubmifted By

J. JOHN O’DONOGHIJE 555160 Mono-Amaranth Town Line 20070417Sheibume LON 1S5

Tel 5199251599

Fax 5199259028

IF5fl5layment

Statutory Registration Fee $60.00

LRO 1* 43 Transfer

The applicant(s) hereby applies to the Land Registrar.

lF51Ta1ymet

Receipted as PR1242625 on 200704 17

vyyv mm dcl

at 14:11

Page? o12

Land Transfer Tax $0.00

Total Paid $60.00

File Number

Transferor Client File Number: 4008907

LAND TRANSFER TAX STATEMENTSIn the matter of the conveyance of: 14086- 0086 PCL 2-1, SEC 43-CHING-3 (W.H.54; PT LT 2. CON 3 WEST OF HURONTARIO

ST TOWNSHIP OF CHINGUACOUSY, PT 1, 43R20801;Ta’W PTS 386,43R20801 AS IN CH22873; T1W Ff54 & 5, 43R20801 AS IN CH33625BRAMPTON

BY: ALTONE INVESTMENTS LIMITED

TO; 1692310 ONTARIO LIMITED %(all PINS)

1. STEVEN RUSE

I am

( (a) A person in trust for whom the land conveyed in the above-described conveyance is being conveyed;

!i (b) A trustee named In the above-described conveyance to whom the land Is being conveyed;

U (c) A transferee named in the above-described conveyance;

El (d) The authonzed agent or sollclLor acting in this transacLion for_ described In paragraph(s) U above.

‘ Ce) The President, Vice-President, Manager, Secretary, Director, or Treasurer authorized to act for 1692310ONTARIO LIMITED described In paragraph(s) Cc) above.

1 (f) A transferee described in paragraph ( ) and am making these statements on my own behalf and on behalf ofwho is my spouse descibed In paragraph U and as such. I have personal knowledge of the facts herein

deposed to.

3. The total consideration for this transaction Is allocated as follows:Ca) Monies paid or to be paid in cash 0.00(b) Mortgages (i) assumed (show pnncipal and Interest to be credited agaInst purchase price) 0.00

(ii) Given Back to Vendor 0.00Cc) Property transferred in exchange (detail below) 0.00Id) Fair market value of the land(s) 0.00Ce) Liens, legacies, annuities and maintenance charges to which transfer Is subject 0.00(I) Other valuable consideration subject to land transfer tax (detail below) 0.00(g) Value of land, building, fixtures and goodwill subiect to land transfer tax (total of (a) to (f)) 0.00(h) VALUE or ALL CHATTELS - items of tangible personal property 0.00(i) Other considerations for transactIon not Included In (g) or (h) above 0.00U) Total consideration 0.00

6. Other remarks and explanations, If necessary.1. Tax has been paid directly to the Minisby of Finance and documents endoised accordingly as confirmed by receipt no.577916 (evidence needs to be submitted)

PROPERTY InformatIon RecordA. Nature of Instrument: Transfer

LRO 43 Registration No. PR1242625 Date: 2007104117

B. Property(s); PIN 14086 -0086 Address Assessment -

BRAMPTON Roll No

C. Address for Service:2430 Deer Run AvenueOakville. OntarioL6J 6K9

D. (i) Last Conveyance(s); PIN 14086 -0086 Registration No. null(ii) Legal Descnplion for Property Conveyed: Same as in last conveyance? Yes [] No [] Not known []

E. Tax Statements Prepared By; Joseph John Peter O’Donoghue555160 Mono-AmaranthTown LineShelburne LON 155

"TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN" (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)

Area of Potential Environmental Concern1

Location of Area of

Potential Environmental

Concern on Phase

Potentially Contaminating Activity2

Location of PCA

Contaminants of

Potential Concern3

Media Potentially Impacted (Ground water, soil and/or

sediment) APEC-1 Historical and current presence of railway lines adjacent to the west boundary of the Property. Fill materials were likely used to raise the site grade for railway tracks and embankment.

Along the western Property boundary

#30. Fill Material of Unknown Quality. Others: Possible product loss from the rail containers

Off-Site Along the western Property boundary

Metals, Hg, As, Sb, Se, B-HWS, Na, Cl-, Cr(VI), EC, SAR, PAHs

Soil Ground water

APEC-2 Historical and current presence of fuel storage tank at the southern adjoining property (8157 Churchville Road).

Along the south Property boundary

#28 Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks

Off-Site South of the Property

Petroleum hydrocarbons PHC (F1-F4) and BTEX

Soil Ground water

Notes: 1 - Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present,

as determined through the phase one environmental site assessment, including through, (a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and (b) identification of potentially contaminating activity.

2 - Potentially Contaminating Activity means a use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a phase one study area 3 - when completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the "Protocol for in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below:

ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical Conductivity SAR CPs PAHs As, Sb, Se Cr (VI) 1,4-Dioxane THMs Na Hg Dioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B-HWS Methyl Mercury OCs BTEX Cl- high pH PHCs Ca, Mg CN- low pH 4 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached **Cette publication hautement spécialisée n’est disponible qu’en anglais en vertu du règlement 671/92, qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur

les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en francais, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère de l’Environnement au 1-800-461-6290

APPENDIX A "TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY" (Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04)

Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use

Property Use1 Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, Etc.

From 13 March 1821 to 31 August 1821

East Half: Jonathan Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No records documenting land use prior to 1954 were available

West Half: Robert Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 31 August 1821 to 03 November 1834

East Half: Jonathan Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

West Half: Timothy Street No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 03 November 1834 to 18 November 1858


West Half: Jacob Snarl No info available Agriculture or other use No info available



West Half: Jacob Snure No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 18 November 1858 to 22 December 1859


West Half: George Snure No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 22 December 1859 to 13 December 1861


West Half: Wesley Todd No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 13 December 1861 to 26 December 1861


West Half: George W. Snure No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 26 December 1861 to 05 November 1863


West Half: Jacob Snure No info available Agriculture or other use No info available



West Half: Quebec Bank No info available Agriculture or other use No info available





West Half: Noah Banhart No info available Agriculture or other use No info available



West Half: Kenneth Chisholm No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 10 November 1871 to 12 July 1877

East Half: George Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available


From 12 July 1877 to 16 July 1877

East Half: James Fleming No info available Agriculture or other use No info available


From 16 July 1877 to 15 October 1883

East Half: John A. Trimble No info available Agriculture or other use No info available


From 15 October 1883 to 12 October 1885

East Half: Hiram D. Lef. No info available Agriculture or other use No info available


From 12 October 1885 to 31 March 1886

East Half: William Hall No info available Agriculture or other use No info available


From 31 March 1886 to 04 October 1887

East Half: William Wilson No info available Agriculture or other use No info available



East Half: William B. Smith No info available Agriculture or other use No info available



East Half: Mary A. Hassard No info available Agriculture or other use No info available


From 26 October 1889 to 18 April 1901

East Half: Matthias Ingram No info available Agriculture or other use No info available


From 18 April 1901 to 28 February 1911




West Half: Mary A. Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 28 February 1911 to 15 March 1915


West Half: Erlin E. Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 15 March 1915 to 10 April 1917

East Half: Russell Robertson No info available Agriculture or other use No info available


From 10 April 1917 to 12 January 1920

East Half: Russell Robertson No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

West Half: Wesley Weech No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 12 January 1920 to 18 March 1920

East Half: Stella K. Narper No info available Agriculture or other use No info available


From 18 March 1920 to 04 January 1921

East Half: William G. Green No info available Agriculture or other use No info available


From 04 January 1921 to 04 January 1921



From 04 January 1921 to 04 January 1921



From 04 January 1921 to 03 September 1932


West Half: David Powrie No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 03 September 1932 to 20 November 1941


West Half: William Dunseath No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 20 November 1941 to 31 March 1942

East Half: William H. Green No info available Agriculture or other use No info available


From 31 March 1942 to 19 August 1943

East Half: Robert Charlton No info available Agriculture or other use No info available




From 19 August 1943 to 30 November 1946


West Half: Jacob Rohrer No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 30 November 1946 to 09 June 1948


West Half: Robert T. Charlton No info available Agriculture or other use No info available

From 09 June 1948 to 01 September 1964

East Half: Robert Charlton Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 1954 – Property is undeveloped, agricultural field present

West Half: Mary E. Denison, Henry L. Denison

Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 1954 – Property is undeveloped, agricultural field present

From 01 September 1964 to 30 November 1972

East Half: Robert C. Charlton Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 1971 – No apparent changes to land use on Property

West Half: Robert C. Charlton Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 1971 – No apparent changes to land use on Property

From 30 November 1972 to 31 January 1973

East Half: Calmist Holdings Limited Undeveloped Agriculture or other use No other observations or information

West Half: Calmist Holdings Limited Undeveloped Agriculture or other use No other observations or information

From 31 January 1973 to 17 April 2007

East Half: Altone Investments Limited Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 1978 – No apparent changes to land use on Property

West Half: Altone Investments Limited Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 1978 – No apparent changes to land use on Property

From 17 April 2007 to Present

1692310 Ontario Limited (both East and West Half)

Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 2009 – No apparent changes to land use on Property

Notes: 1 - for each owner, specify one of the following types of property use (as defined in O.Reg. 153/04) that applies: Agriculture or other use Commercial use Community use Industrial use Institutional use Parkland use Residential use 2 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached **Cette publication hautement spécialisée n’est disponible qu’en anglais en vertu du règlement 671/92, qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en francais, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère matière de changement climatique de l’Environnement et de l’Action en au 1-800-461-629

Terraprobe Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering

Construction Materials Inspection & Testing

Terraprobe Inc. Greater Toronto Hamilton – Niagara Central Ontario Northern Ontario

11 Indell Lane 903 Barton Street, Unit 22 220 Bayview Drive, Unit 25 1012 Kelly Lake Rd., Unit 1

Brampton, Ontario L6T 3Y3 Stoney Creek, Ontario L8E 5P5 Barrie, Ontario L4N 4Y8 Sudbury, Ontario P3E 5P4

(905) 796-2650 Fax: 796-2250 (905) 643-7560 Fax: 643-7559 (705) 739-8355 Fax: 739-8369 (705) 670-0460 Fax: 670-0558

www.terraprobe.ca

PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION

CVSP BLOCK 6, ALTONE WEST BRAMPTON, ONTARIO

File No. 13-12-2042 January 31, 2013

Updated: November 13, 2014

©Terraprobe Inc.

Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014

CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2

Terraprobe Page No. ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Property Description ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Current and Future Uses of the Property ............................................................................ 2 1.3 Applicable Site Condition Standards .................................................................................. 2

2.0 INFORMATION FROM THE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT .......... 3 2.1 Areas Where Potentially Contaminating Activity Has Occurred ....................................... 3 2.2 Areas of Potential Environmental Concern ........................................................................ 3 2.3 Subsurface Structures and Utilities ..................................................................................... 5

3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY ........................................................ 6 3.1 Physical Setting ................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Site Stratigraphy ................................................................................................................. 6 3.3 Site Hydrogeological Characteristics .................................................................................. 7 3.4 Approximate Depth to Bedrock .......................................................................................... 7 3.5 Approximate Depth to Water Table .................................................................................... 7 3.6 Section 41 or 43.1 ............................................................................................................. 10 3.7 Soil Placed On, In or Under the Phase Two Property ....................................................... 10 3.8 Proposed Buildings ........................................................................................................... 10

4.0 CONTAMINATION IN OR UNDER THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY ..................................... 11 4.1 Summary of Sampling Plan .............................................................................................. 11 4.2 Sampling Program Quality Assurance and Quality Control Measures ............................. 12 4.3 Contaminants Associated with Each Area ........................................................................ 13 4.4 Medium in Which Contaminant are Associated ............................................................... 14 4.5 Information Known about Each Contaminated Area ........................................................ 14 4.6 Distribution of Contaminant ............................................................................................. 14 4.7 Reasons for Discharge of Contaminants ........................................................................... 14 4.8 Migration of Contaminants ............................................................................................... 14 4.9 Climatic or Meteorological Influences on Migration ....................................................... 15 4.10 Soil Vapour Intrusion into Buildings ................................................................................ 15 4.11 Relevant Construction Features of Buildings ................................................................... 15 4.12 Building HVAC ................................................................................................................ 15

5.0 POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS.................................................... 16 5.1 Receptor Human Health .................................................................................................... 16 5.2 Receptor Terrestrial Environment ..................................................................................... 16 5.3 Receptor Ecological Environment .................................................................................... 17



Terraprobe Page No. iii

ATTACHMENT:

Attachment A: Survey Plan

FIGURES:

Figure 1 – Site Location Plan

Figure 2 – CSM &Area of Potential Environmental Concern

Figure 3 – Borehole/Monitoring Well & Cross -Section Location Plan

Figure 4 – Cross Section A-A’

Figure 5 – Cross Section B-B’

Figure 6 – Soil and Ground Water Quality

Figure 7 – Ground Water Flow Direction

Figure 8 – Pathways and Receptors



Terraprobe Page No 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The following document presents the Phase Two Conceptual Site Model for the Property located at CVSP

Block 6, Altone West in Brampton, Ontario. The Phase Two Conceptual Site Model is part of the report

titled “Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario”,

January 31, 2013, prepared by Terraprobe Inc. A Phase One ESA Update was completed for the Property

on November 4, 2014 per our report entitled “Phase One ESA Update, CVSP Block 6, Altone West,

Brampton, Ontario”, November 4, 2014. Based on the Phase One ESA Update, the Phase Two ESA was

updated on November 13, 2014.

1.1 Property Description

The Phase Two Property is located on the east side of Churchville Road in the City of Brampton. The

Property is located approximately 100 m east of Churchville Road, 0.6 km west of Chinguacousy Road

and north of Steeles Avenue West. The Property is an approximately triangular shaped parcel of

undeveloped land that covers an area of approximately 4.9 ha (approximately 12 acres). The Property is

located in a mixed residential, parkland and farmland area of the City of Brampton. The location of the

Property is shown in Figure 1. General site features are presented in the Survey Plan (Appendix A),

prepared by J. D. Barnes Limited, Ontario Land Surveyor, dated April 10, 2013.

The Phase One Property was undeveloped, covered with natural vegetation including tall grass, bushes

and trees. The Property is proposed to be developed as a residential sub-division consisting of town

houses, access roads and parking areas.

The Property information is provided in the following Table.

Municipal Address No Municipal Address Yet

Property Identified As CVSP Block 6, Altone West in Brampton, Ontario

Legal Description Part of Lot 2, Concession 3, West of Hurontario Street Designated as Part 1, Plan 43R-20801 Geographic Township of Chinguacousy, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel

PIN 14086-0086

Assessment Roll No. 10-08-0-011-12754-0000

Zoning Type A agricultural

Property Owner Information

1692310 Ontario Limited President: Mr. Jack Eisenberger Address: 501-5400 Yonge Street Toronto, ON M2N 5R5 Tel: 416-227-9005 Fax: 416-227-9007 Email: Jack Eisenberger [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]




1.2 Current and Future Uses of the Property

The current use of the Property is agricultural. The Property is proposed to be developed as a residential

subdivision consisting of town houses.

The land use of the adjoining and surrounding areas is summarized below:

Direction from Property Current Typical Land Use

North Vacant –Agricultural- Open Space, Flood Plan

East Hydro transmission Line, Agricultural, Open Space, Flood Plan (Totten Valley),

new residential development along James Potter Road

South Agricultural (8157 Churchville Road), Flood Plan (Kee Valley)

West CPR-CNR rail lines, vacant – Flood Plan, Residential houses along Churchville

Road

1.3 Applicable Site Condition Standards

The applicable Site Condition Standards for the Subject Property were considered to be those contained in

Table 3 of the April 15, 2011 Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) “Soil, Ground Water and

Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act” for residential/park

land/institutional) property use in a non-potable ground water condition for coarse textured soil (Table 3

RPI Standards). These are considered to be the applicable Standards for the property based on the

following reasons:

The entire Property is currently undeveloped. The proposed land use for the Property will be

residential. Therefore residential Standards would apply to the subject site.

The proposed development will be serviced by Region of Peel for municipal piped water and

sanitary sewers. The adjoining new developed properties are municipally serviced with municipal

piped water by the City of Brampton. The City of Brampton obtains its drinking water from lake

water sources. Therefore, non-potable ground water Standards would apply.

Based upon the above rationale, it is determined that the applicable soil and ground water standards are

found in Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Table 3 (Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards for

R/P/I Property Use in a non-Potable Ground Water Condition).

No exceedances of the MOE Table 3 standards were identified in any of the soil or ground water samples

analyzed. Based on the laboratory results, no contaminants of concern (COC) are present at the Property.




2.0 INFORMATION FROM THE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

2.1 Areas Where Potentially Contaminating Activity Has Occurred

No potentially contaminating activities (PCAs) were identified for the Phase One Property.

Two off-site PCAs were identified within the Phase One Study Area as described below:

#28-Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks. Historical and current presence of

above ground heating oil storage tank at the southern adjoining property (8157 Churchville

Road). The Contaminants of Potential Concern (CoPCs) are petroleum hydrocarbon (PHCs). The

CoCs may have impacted the soil and ground water.

#30- Fill Material of Unknown Quality. Historical and current presence of railway lines adjacent

to the west boundary of the Property. Fill materials were likely used to raise the site grade for

railway tracks and embankment. The Contaminants of Concern (COCs) are metals & inorganics,

and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The CoPCs may have impacted the soil and

ground water.

2.2 Areas of Potential Environmental Concern

The Areas of Potential Environmental Concern are presented on Figure 2. The following Table

summarizes the potential environmental concerns identified for the Phase One Property.




"Table of Areas Of Potential Environmental Concern" (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)

The following table summarizes the potential environmental concerns identified in the Phase One Study Area.

Area of Potential Environmental Concern

Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase One Property

Potentially Contaminating Activity

Location of PCA (on-site or off-site)

Contaminants of

Potential Concern3

Media Potentially Impacted (Ground water, soil and/or sediment)

APEC-1 Historical and current presence of railway lines adjacent to the west boundary of the Property. Fill materials were likely used to raise the site grade for railway tracks and embankment.

Along the western Property boundary

#30. Fill Material of Unknown Quality. Others: Possible product loss from the rail containers

Off-Site Along the western Property boundary

Metals, Hg, As, Sb, Se, B-HWS, Na, Cl-, Cr(VI), EC, SAR, PAHs

Soil Ground water

APEC-2 Historical and current presence of fuel storage tank at the southern adjoining property (8157 Churchville Road).

Along the south Property boundary

#28 Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks

Off-Site South of the Property

Petroleum hydrocarbons PHC (F1-F4)+ BTEX

Soil Ground water




2.3 Subsurface Structures and Utilities

Various utility agencies were contacted to identify buried services on public land in the vicinity of the

subject Property. A private locator was retained to survey the proposed borehole locations for buried

services. The Property is undeveloped and includes no underground utilities for contamination transport

purposes. Based upon this, it is unlikely that any potentially contaminated ground water would migrate

along the utilities; and the potential that underground utility trenches in the area may affect contaminant

distribution and transport is unlikely.




3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY

3.1 Physical Setting

The Phase One Property and Study Area are located in a mixed parkland, residential and agricultural area

of Brampton.

Based on the 1982 Ontario Base Map information the ground surface is at approximately 195 m geodetic

elevation that decreases towards the east, west and south. The Property is located approximately 120

metres above the level of Lake Ontario. The site topography is naturally undulating and generally slopes

to the southwest and to the southeast.

According the topographic map of the site (Map 30 M/12, 7th Edition, Brampton), which covers the

Property, the ground surface at the vicinity of the Property slopes in a southwesterly direction. The

nearest water features are, the Credit River located approximately 0.5 km southwest of the Property and

an unnamed tributary of the Credit River located approximately 100 m east and south of the Property

boundary. Regionally, the ground surface slopes down to the southeast.

According to the geological map entitled “Quaternary Geology of Ontario-Southern Sheet” Map 2556,

published by the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, dated 1991, the overburden in the region

of the subject property consists of Halton Till from the Ontario-Erie Lobe. This material is generally

characterized as a silt to silty-clay till matrix.

According to Map 2176, Brampton Area, Southern Ontario, Industrial Mineral Resource Sheet, dated

1966, prepared by Ontario, Department of Mines, the Phase One Property is located in area that consists

of clay or silt till of Wisconsinan formation of Pleistocene.

According to the bedrock geology map entitled “Bedrock Geology of Ontario-Southern Sheet” published

by the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, dated 1991, the bedrock in the area consists of

Upper Ordovician, Queenston Formation. The Queenston Formation, consists of shale, limestone,

dolostone and siltstone.

3.2 Site Stratigraphy

The stratigraphic conditions at the site have been assessed on the basis of sampled boreholes, and grain-

size analysis. Approximate borehole/monitoring well locations are identified on Figure 3.

The stratigraphy encountered at the Property is described below and shown on Figures 6A and 6B:

Surficial Materials: The ground surface was covered with grass and a veneer of topsoil at each borehole

locations.




Fill materials/ Disturbed Native. Possible fill materials/weathered native soils consisting of sand to silty

sand with trace amounts of clay and gravel and inclusion of natural organics (rootlets) were encountered

at each borehole location to maximum depth of 0.6 m to 1.2 m below the existing grade. The fill/disturbed

native layer was underlain by undisturbed native soil deposits. The fill material/disturbed native soils was

generally moist. No staining or odours were noted in any of the soil samples obtained from the

fill/disturbed native layer.

Native soils. All boreholes penetrated into undisturbed native soil deposits. Generally, the native soils

consisted of moist sand to silty sand trace clay and trace gravel to depths of 1.2 to 2.4 m below existing

grades. The sandy material was underlain by moist to wet clayey silt to silty clay with trace amounts of

sand and gravel and extended to the full depth of investigation to 15.9 m below grade. No staining or

odours were noted in any of the native soil samples.

Bedrock. Bedrock was not encountered at any of the borehole locations.

3.3 Site Hydrogeological Characteristics

A hydraulic gradient based on the limited number of monitoring events may be unreliable, and thus one

was not provided herein.

According to Freeze and Cherry (1979) and the Ministry of the Environment (1997), the typical hydraulic

conductivity of the strata investigated is:

Sand: 10-4

m/s to 10-6

m/s

Silty Sand: 10-5

m/s to 10-7

m/s

Clayey Silt: 10-7

m/s to 10-9

m/s

Clay: 10-9

m/s to 10-10

m/s

3.4 Approximate Depth to Bedrock

Based on the published information, the bedrock in the area consists of the Queenston Formation which

consists of shale, limestone, dolostone and siltstone. According to the borehole logs, the depth to bedrock

at the location of the Property is over 15.9 m.

3.5 Approximate Depth to Water Table

The approximate elevation of the ground water table with reference to an assume benchmark of 100 m

ranges from 83.90to 97.01 mbgs.




The ground water elevations are shown on Cross Sections A-A’ and B-B’ (Figures 4 and 5). The ground water elevations and flow

direction are shown on Figure 7.

Well Ground Elevation(m)

Borehole Depth (m)

water level Nov. 5 & 6, 2012

Borehole Depth Nov. 13, 2012 (m)

Water Depth Nov. 13, 2012 (m)





Borehole Depth Jan. 10, 2013 (m)

Water Depth Jan. 10, 2013 (m)

Water Elevation (*mbgs)

MW/BH1

98.890 15.9 Dry

15.02 13.09 15.2 12.95 15.24 13.04 15.15 13.02 85.87

MW/BH2

99.235 5.2 Dry

5.2 5.09 5.2 3.18 5.29 2.29 5.24 2.17 97.065

MW/BH3

99.685 13.7 Dry

13.7 Dry 13.8 Dry 13.8 Dry 13.75 13.72 85.965

MW/BH4

92.815 6.7 Dry

6.08 Dry 6.14 5.32 6.14 4.29 6.06 1.82 90.995

MW/BH5

88.825 6.7 Dry

6.07 Dry 6.12 Dry 6.12 Dry 6.07 4.92 83.905

*Note:

mbgs - meter below ground surface

Groundwater depth is depth metre below ground surface (mbgs)

The ground surface elevations were referenced to a local benchmark (assumed elevation 100m), located at west corner of hydro tower in field.




3.6 Section 41 or 43.1

Section 41 of the regulation (Environmentally Sensitive Areas) is not applicable to the Phase

Two Property. The site is not considered to be a ‘sensitive’ site under O. Reg. 153/04. Section

43.1of the regulation (within 30 m of a natural water body), as described under O.Reg.153/04.

Therefore, the applicable Site Condition Standards for the Subject Property were considered to

be those contained in Table 3 of the April 15, 2011 Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE)

“Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental

Protection Act” for residential/park land/institutional) property use in a non-potable ground

water condition for coarse textured soil (Table 3 RPI Standards).

The proposed development will be serviced by Region of Peel for municipal piped water and sanitary

sewers. The adjoining new developed properties are municipally serviced with municipal piped water by

the City of Brampton. The City of Brampton obtains its drinking water from lake water sources.

Therefore, non-potable ground water Standards would apply. Therefore, non-potable ground water

Standards would apply.

3.7 Soil Placed On, In or Under the Phase Two Property

No soils have been imported or placed on, in or under the Phase Two Property since the Phase One ESA was

completed in January 2013. Soils may be placed on the Property as part of the future development. The

quality of the any imported soil material must meet the applicable Table 3 RPI standards.

3.8 Proposed Buildings

The Property will be developed as a residential sub-division consisting of town houses, access roads and

parking areas. The proposed development will be serviced by Region of Peel for municipal piped water and

sanitary sewers.




4.0 CONTAMINATION IN OR UNDER THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY

The APECs identified in the Phase One ESA were investigated in the Phase Two ESA; and soil and

ground water samples were collected and tested for contaminants of potential concern (COPC). The

parameters analyzed for soil and ground water samples included: petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs fraction

F1 to F4), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metals and

inorganics parameters. Based on the findings of the Phase One ESA, the potential contaminants of

concern for the Phase Two Property included the following:

Soil: Metals, As, Sb, Se Cr (VI), Hg, Electrical Conductivity, Sodium Adsorption Ratio, PHC (F1-F4),

and PAHs

Ground Water: Metals, PHC (F1-F4), VOCs and PAHs

4.1 Summary of Sampling Plan

The sampling program was developed with regards to the potentially contaminating activities identified in

the Phase One Conceptual Site Model. The sampling program involved investigation of soil and ground

water quality across the Phase Two Property. The analytical parameters included petroleum

hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, metals and inorganic parameters, and polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons. This range of parameters addressed all of the COPC identified for the Property.

The table below summarizes the sampling program conducted by Terraprobe and the number of samples

analyzed. In addition, duplicates samples; field blanks and trip blanks were analysed for ground water

samples as per the QA/QC protocols.

Date Scope of Investigation

Scope of Soil Analysis

Scope of Ground Water Analysis

November 2012 to Jan 2013 AGAT Laboratory

5 boreholes drilled

5 monitoring well installed

3 set of water levels from 5 wells

6 M&I analyses

1 PHC+BTEX analyses

4 PAH analyses

3 M&I analyses

4 PHC+BTEX analyses

3 VOC analyses

4 PAH analyses

*Note: above-noted table does not include QA/QC samples including trip blank and field blank samples

The following is summary of the findings of the Phase Two ESA conducted for CVSP Block 6, Altone

West, Brampton:

The Phase Two ESA consisted of drilling five (5) boreholes and installing monitoring well in

each of the boreholes to collect representative samples at the Property.




A total of eleven (11) soil samples including quality control (QC) duplicates were analysed for

PHCs (F1-F4), PAHs, and metals and inorganic parameters.

A total of four (4) ground water samples including quality control (QC) duplicates were analysed

for PHCs (F1-F4), VOCs, PAHs, and metals and inorganic parameters.

The results of the samples submitted for chemical analysis were compared to the full depth

generic site condition standards in a non-potable ground water condition for coarse textured soil

as contained in Table 3 of the Ministry of Environment (MOE) publication “Soil, Ground Water

and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act” for

residential/parkland/institutional (RPI) use, April 15, 2011.

No exceedances of the applicable Standards for parameters analysed were found in any of the soil

samples tested.

Ground water samples collected from three monitoring location met the applicable Table 3

Standards for all parameters analysed. As a result, groundwater at, in, under the property meets

the applicable MOE Table 3 standards.

4.2 Sampling Program Quality Assurance and Quality Control Measures

Soil and ground water samples obtained during the investigations were handled in accordance with

generally accepted professional practices under the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the

Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act and the MOE Guidance

on Sampling and Analytical Methods for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario.

Laboratory-supplied sample containers, containing the appropriate preservatives as required by the given

analyses, were used for all sampling conducted on the Property.

All sample containers were labelled accordingly to identify the sample location. Documentation related to

sample location, depth, and time of sampling was recorded for each sample. The samples were

immediately placed in coolers packed with ice.

Until delivery to the analytical laboratory, custody of the samples was maintained by Terraprobe.

Terraprobe transferred custody of the samples for analysis to AGAT Laboratories within an adequate time

frame to ensure ‘hold times’ would be within the acceptable criteria. Chain of Custody forms identifying

the samples and analyses were submitted to the respective laboratory to document the transfer of custody.

Quality control samples included field duplicates and blanks. The following quality control measures

were implemented for this investigation.

A clean pair of disposable latex gloves was used for each sample (soil and ground water)

that was collected.

During sampling, non-dedicated sampling equipment (split spoon barrel sampler, shovel,

auger, trowels) were washed prior to re-use.

Ground water samples were collected using Mega Masson Submersible pump.




Soil and ground water field duplicates were submitted at a frequency of one duplicate

sample for every 10 samples.

The field instruments were calibrated prior to use.

There were no deviations from the procedures set out in the quality assurance and quality control program

set out in the sampling and analysis plan.

Laboratory sample analyses were provided by AGAT Laboratories of Mississauga, Ontario. AGAT

Laboratories is accredited by the Standards Council of Canada and Canadian Association for

Environmental Laboratories in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025 (1999) for the parameters tested in the

investigation.

The quality assurance and quality control program includes a collection of field duplicates, trip blanks and

trip spikes. In addition, AGAT Laboratories included a standard internal QA/QC program consisting of

the analysis of replicates and assessment of surrogate recoveries.

Based on a review of the field and laboratory QA/QC data, there are no issues that would affect the

quality of the laboratory data or interpretation of the results.

4.3 Contaminants Associated with Each Area

The applicable Site Condition Standards (SCS) for the Subject Property were considered to be those

contained in Table 3 of the April 15, 2011 Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) “Soil, Ground Water

and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act” for

residential/park land/institutional) property use in a non-potable ground water condition for coarse

textured soil (Table 3 RPI Standards). The pH of the surficial and sub-surficial soil ranged between 6.18

to 8.02. This pH range is within the MOE range of 5.0 to 9 for surface soil (up to 1.5 m depth) and 5.0 to

11 for sub-surface soil (over 1.5 m depth).The results of the samples submitted for chemical analysis were

compared to the MOE Table 3.

Investigation was completed at the areas of potential environmental concern and COPC were assessed

based on the laboratory analyses. The contaminants of concern associated with each area of the property

are identified in Table 4.3-1 below:

Table 4.3-1 Results of Chemical Testing and Contaminated of Concern

COPC Tested Earth Fill/Disturbed Native and Native Soil

Ground Water COC Present Yes/No

Metals and Inorganic Parameters

All analyzed parameters meet SCS

All analyzed parameters meet SCS

No

VOCs No COPC identified in soil All analyzed parameters remained below laboratory minimum detection limits

No




PAHs All analyzed parameters remained below laboratory minimum detection limits

All analyzed parameters remained below laboratory minimum detection limits

No

PHC (F1-F4) & BTEX



No

Contaminants in Soil: No exceedances of the applicable SCS for any parameter were found in any soil

samples analyzed.

Contaminants in Ground Water: No exceedances of the applicable SCS for any parameter were found

in any ground water samples analyzed.

There are no contaminants present at the Property. Figures 4 and 5 represent the sampling locations and

the results of soil and ground water respectively.

4.4 Medium in Which Contaminant are Associated

The COPC were associated with soil and ground water. Phase Two investigation has confirmed that there

are no contaminants present at the Property.

4.5 Information Known about Each Contaminated Area

No contaminated areas were encountered in the Phase Two ESA investigation.

4.6 Distribution of Contaminant

There are no contaminants present at the Property. No contaminated areas were encountered in the Phase

Two ESA investigation; hence distribution of contaminants is unlikely.

4.7 Reasons for Discharge of Contaminants

No contaminants were found at the Property.

4.8 Migration of Contaminants

There are no contaminants present at the Property. No contaminated areas were encountered in the Phase

Two ESA investigation; hence distribution and migration of contaminants is unlikely.

The proposed residential sub-division will include town houses and one level of basement structure. It is

anticipated that underground services will be above the water table. As such the utilities do not offer a

pathway for contamination to migrate and enter the ground water table.




4.9 Climatic or Meteorological Influences on Migration

The climatic conditions and fluctuations in the groundwater levels have a negligible effect on the

migration of contaminants within the groundwater as no large temporal fluctuations in the groundwater

levels were measured.

4.10 Soil Vapour Intrusion into Buildings

No potential for soil vapour intrusion is identified.

There is no impact identified with the soil or ground water at the Property.

4.11 Relevant Construction Features of Buildings

No building is currently present at the Property. The proposed residential sub-division will include town

houses and one level of basement structure.

4.12 Building HVAC

The proposed residential sub-division will include town-houses. The town houses will have independent

air condition systems. There is no impact identified with the soil or ground water at the Property, hence

any intrusion and distribution of soil vapors through the air conditioning system is unlikely.




5.0 POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS

The conceptual model for the current site conditions is shown in Figure 8. Figure 8 is a graphical

representation of potential pathways and receptors and does not have a scale or orientation which can be

related to the Phase Two Property.The potential sources pathways and receptors are summarized below:

5.1 Receptor Human Health

Source Contaminant of Concern

Potential Pathways

Potential Risks

Fill None

Soil Ingestion No Risk- No Source

Soil Inhalation No Risk- No Source

Soil Skin Contact No Risk- No Source

Native Soil None




Ground Water

None

Ground water Ingestion

No Risk- No Source

Ground water Skin Contact

No Risk- No Source

5.2 Receptor Terrestrial Environment


Potential Pathways

Potential Risks

Fill None




Root uptake surface water

No Risk- No receptor

Native Soil None



Ingestion of prey/food

No Risk- No Source

Ground Water

None

Ground water Ingestion

No Risk- No Source

Root Uptake No Risk- No Source




5.3 Receptor Ecological Environment


Potential Pathways

Potential Risks

Ground Water

None Gill Uptake No Risk- No Source.

Water Ingestion No Risk- No Source.

Prey/Food Ingestion

No Risk- No Source.

FIGURES

TERRAPROBE INC.