ontario ministry of the environment - record of site

Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # 210727

Record of Site Condition

Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has

access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings

with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental

condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from

the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been

submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment.

Record of Site Condition Number 210727Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 18/11/2013Certification Date 15/10/2013Current Property Use CommercialIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,

with Non-potable Ground Water, CoarseTextured Soil, for Residential property use

Property Municipal Address 1205 Queen Street West M6K 1L2

RSC Information

Each field marked by an asterisk ( ) must be completed.*

Is the property used, or has it ever been used, in whole or in part for an industrial use or as a garage;a bulk liquid dispensing facility, including a gasoline outlet; or for the operation of dry cleaning equipment?

Yes

No

*

Is the property being used or has the property ever been used, in whole or in part(a) for quarrying to excavate consolidated or unconsolidated aggregate; or(b) for that aspect of the production of oil and gas consisting of the presence of an oil well or gas well on, in or under the property?

Yes

No

*

Is the property currently used for an agricultural or other use, or a community use, an institutional use, a parkland use or a residential use?

Yes

No

*

Select Type of RSC

Phase 1 and 2 RSC

Phase 1 and 2 RSC with RA

*

Owner Information

Owners' General Information

Submitting Owner's Information

RSC Property Information

Environmental Condition

Contaminant Concentrations

ESA Information

QP Profile Information

Certification Statement

Supporting Documents

Owner's Information

Owners' General InformationIs the submitting owner(s) a Receiver for the Property? *

Yes

No

Is the submitting owner(s) represented by an Agent? *

Yes

No

Owner's Information


Type of Owner *

Firm, Corporation or Partnership 1493201 Ontario Limited

Owner Name *

Street Number

208

* Street Name

Oxford Street

* Apt No. /RR No.

City, Town or Village *

Richmond Hill Ontario

Province *

L4C 4L7

Postal Code *

Submitting Owner's Contact Information

Contact First Name *

Boris

Contact Last Name *

Shteiman

Phone Number * (including area code)

(416) 464-6062 (905) 770-7851

Fax Number (including area code)

[email protected]

Email Address

Country

Canada

Owner Information

Owners' General Information





ESA Information





Property AddressOwner Information


Property Address

Municipality Information

Property Reference Number

Geographical Reference/Area of RSC Property

Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s)



ESA Information



Does the Property have a Municipal Address?

Yes

No

*

Is the property administered by MNR under the Public Lands Act?

Yes

No

*

Street Number *

1205 Queen Street West

Apt No. /RR No.Street Name *

City, Town or Village *

Toronto Ontario

Province *

M6K 1L2

Postal Code *


Municipality & Property Address Information


Lower or Single Tier Municipality *

Toronto

Tier of Municipality

Single Tier

The District Office of MOE *

Toronto District Office

Owner Information


Property Address







ESA Information




Address of District Office of MOE

5775 Yonge St., 8th floor, North York ON M2M 4J1

Municipality & Property Address Information


Assessment Roll Number

19 04 021 350 02400 0000 0 4

Property Identifier Number (PIN #)

21302-0416 (LT)

Owner Information


Property Address







ESA Information




Geo Reference & Other Properties Details

Geographical References

UTM Coordinates

Datum

NAD 83

Zone *

17

*Easting

626,723.90

*

Area of RSC Property

Northing

4,833,304.77

Total Area of RSC Property in Hectares

0.146*

Owner Information


Property Address







ESA Information




Previous Submission Information

Previously Filed Record of Site Condition Number:

Previously Filed Transition Notice Number:

Owner Information


Property Address







ESA Information





Site Condition InformationOther Site Condition Information

Is the RSC being submitted using the transition provision under Section 21.1 of the Regulation?

Yes

No

*

Owner Information



Other Site Condition Information

Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards

Risk Assessment Information

Property Use and CertificationDate

Additional Ground WaterInformation

Remedial Action and Mitigation Details

Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Table of Current/Past Property Uses of Phase One Property


ESA Information





Site Condition InformationSite Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards

Is Property:(i) Within an area of natural significance? orDoes Property:(ii) Include or is adjacent to an area of natural significance or part of such an area? or(ii) Include land that is within 30 m of an area of natural significance or part of such an area.

Yes

No

*

Soil at the property has:(i) a pH value for Surface Soil less than 5 or greater than 9 or(ii) a pH value for Subsurface Soil less than 5 or greater than 11.

Yes

No

*

Is qualified person of the opinion that, given the characteristics of the property and the certifications thequalified person would be required to make in a record of site condition in relation to the property as specifiedin Schedule A, it is appropriate to apply this section to the property?

Yes

No

*

What is the intended use of the property? *

Residential

Is the property a shallow soil property?

Yes

No

*

Does the property include or is the property adjacent to a water body or does it include land that is within30 metres of a water body?

Yes

No

*

What is the Assessment/Restoration approach?

Background

Full Depth Generic

Stratified

*

What is the ground water condition for the property?

Potable

Non-potable

*

What is the texture of the soil?

Coarse

Medium and Fine

*

Applicable 2011 Generic Standard Table Number : TABLE 3

Owner Information












ESA Information




Risk Assessment InformationHas a Certificate of Property Use (CPU) been issued under section 168.6 of the Act for the RSC property?

Yes

No

Owner Information












ESA Information




Property Use and Certification Date

Current Property Use and Certification Date

What is the current use of the property? *

Commercial

Certification Date

2013/10/15*

Owner Information












ESA Information





Site Condition InformationAdditional Ground Water Information

Has municipality been notified of non-potable ground water on site?

Yes

No

*

Municipality notified of non-potable water by?

Owner

QP

*

Local/Lower tier municipality non-potable water notification date *

2013/10/04

Owner Information






Property Use and CertificationData






ESA Information





Remedial Action & MitigationSoil Control or Treatment Measures

Identify the estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that havebeen remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in thesoil as measured in, or equivalent to, in-ground volume in cubic metres, and indicate the remediation process orprocesses used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.

None

Identify the estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSCproperty as measured in, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres.

60

Identify the estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at theRSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property notincluding any soil that may have been remediated off the property and brought back to the property as measuredin, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres.

50

Indicate if any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of theRSC property boundary has been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation.

Yes, soil was removed within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary as shown on the Phase II CSM.

Owner Information












ESA Information





Remedial Action & MitigationGround Water Control or Treatment Measures

Identify and describe any ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC propertyprior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing; or are or will be required for theRSC property after the certification date.

None

Identify the estimated volume in litres of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

None

Other Treatment Measures

Other than the activities identified in the in the Soil or Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures above,identify any constructed works that, prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing,were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at theRSC property; or after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movementof known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

None required.

Indicate whether there are any monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance orreplacement of any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSCproperty, after the certification date, and whether any monitoring requirements or requirements for care,maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works are ground water management measuresor soil management measures.

None required.

Owner Information












ESA Information





Potential Environmental ConcernArea(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Are there areas of potential environmental concern? *

Yes

No

Click here for Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Form

Current and Past Property UseTable of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Click here for Table of Current and Past Property Use Form

Owner Information










Table of Current/Past Property Use of Phase One Property


ESA Information





Contaminants Measured in SOILGeneral Information Related to Soil Media

Is there no soil on, in or under the property? (Note there is “no soil” if either there is no soil on, in or under the property OR the soil present is not sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze in a manner which will meet the requirements and objectives of a phase two environmental site assessment)

Yes

No

*

Owner Information




Contaminants Measured in SOIL

Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER

Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS

ESA Information




Owner Information







ESA Information




Contaminants Measured in SOILMeasured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

Contaminant 1-30 * Type of Measurement *Measured

Concentration* Applicable

StandardUnit Of

Measure

Sodium Adsorption Ratio Measured 0.63 5

Electrical Conductivity Measured 0.18 0.7 mS/cm

Cyanide (CN-) Minimum Detectable 0.01 0.051 µg/g

Antimony Minimum Detectable 0.2 7.5 µg/g

Arsenic Measured 2.6 18 µg/g

Barium Measured 34 390 µg/g

Beryllium Measured 0.26 4 µg/g

Boron (total) Minimum Detectable 5.0 120 µg/g

Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* Measured 1.4 1.5 µg/g

Cadmium Minimum Detectable 0.1 1.2 µg/g

Chromium Total Measured 12 160 µg/g

Chromium VI Minimum Detectable 0.2 8 µg/g

Cobalt Measured 6.0 22 µg/g

Copper Measured 14 140 µg/g

Lead Measured 4.7 120 µg/g

Molybdenum Minimum Detectable 0.50 6.9 µg/g

Mercury Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.27 µg/g

Nickel Measured 12 100 µg/g

Selenium Minimum Detectable 0.50 2.4 µg/g

Silver Minimum Detectable 0.20 20 µg/g

Thallium Measured 0.052 1 µg/g

Uranium Measured 1.3 23 µg/g

Vanadium Measured 18 86 µg/g

Zinc Measured 26 340 µg/g

Acetone Minimum Detectable 0.50 16 µg/g

Benzene Minimum Detectable 0.020 0.21 µg/g

Bromodichloromethane Minimum Detectable 0.050 13 µg/g

Bromoform Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.27 µg/g

Bromomethane Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.05 µg/g

Carbon Tetrachloride Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.05 µg/g

Total # of Contaminants 84


Owner Information







ESA Information





Contaminant 31-60* Type of Measurement *Measured


StandardUnit Of

Measure

Chlorobenzene Minimum Detectable 0.050 2.4 µg/g

Chloroform Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.05 µg/g

Dibromochloromethane Minimum Detectable 0.050 9.4 µg/g

Dichlorodifluoromethane Minimum Detectable 0.050 16 µg/g

Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- Minimum Detectable 0.050 3.4 µg/g



Dichlorodifluoromethane Minimum Detectable 0.050 16 µg/g

Dichloroethane, 1,1- Minimum Detectable 0.050 3.5 µg/g

Dichloroethane, 1,2- Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.05 µg/g

Dichloroethylene, 1,1- Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.05 µg/g

Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- Minimum Detectable 0.050 3.4 µg/g

Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.084 µg/g

Dichloropropane, 1,2- Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.05 µg/g

Dichloropropene,1,3- Minimum Detectable 0.040 0.05 µg/g

Ethylbenzene Minimum Detectable 0.020 2 µg/g

Ethylene dibromide Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.05 µg/g

Hexane (n) Minimum Detectable 0.050 2.8 µg/g

Methyl Ethyl Ketone Minimum Detectable 0.50 16 µg/g

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone Minimum Detectable 0.50 1.7 µg/g

Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.75 µg/g

Methylene Chloride Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.1 µg/g

Styrene Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.7 µg/g

Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.058 µg/g

Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.05 µg/g

Tetrachloroethylene Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.28 µg/g

Toluene Minimum Detectable 0.020 2.3 µg/g

Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.38 µg/g

Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.05 µg/g

Trichloroethylene Minimum Detectable 0.050 0.061 µg/g



Owner Information







ESA Information







StandardUnit Of

Measure

Trichlorofluoromethane Minimum Detectable 0.050 4 µg/g

Vinyl Chloride Minimum Detectable 0.020 0.02 µg/g

Xylene Mixture Minimum Detectable 0.020 3.1 µg/g

Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** Minimum Detectable 10 55 µg/g

Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 Minimum Detectable 10 98 µg/g



Acenaphthene Minimum Detectable 0.0050 7.9 µg/g

Acenaphthylene Minimum Detectable 0.0050 0.15 µg/g

Anthracene Measured 0.015 0.67 µg/g

Benz[a]anthracene Measured 0.051 0.5 µg/g

Benzo[a]pyrene Measured 0.055 0.3 µg/g

Benzo[b]fluoranthene Measured 0.064 0.78 µg/g

Benzo[ghi]perylene Measured 0.034 6.6 µg/g

Benzo[k]fluoranthene Measured 0.024 0.78 µg/g

Chrysene Measured 0.049 7 µg/g

Dibenz[a h]anthracene Measured 0.0080 0.1 µg/g

Fluorene Minimum Detectable 0.0050 62 µg/g

Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene Measured 0.033 0.38 µg/g

Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** Minimum Detectable 0.0050 0.99 µg/g

Naphthalene Minimum Detectable 0.0050 0.6 µg/g

Phenanthrene Measured 0.042 6.2 µg/g

Pyrene Measured 0.090 78 µg/g

Polychlorinated Biphenyls Minimum Detectable 0.010 0.35 µg/g




Contaminants Measured in Ground WaterMeasured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground Water

Contaminant 1-30 * Type of Measurement *Measured


StandardUnit Of

Measure

Antimony Measured 1.1 20000 µg/L

Arsenic Measured 9.5 1900 µg/L

Barium Measured 220 29000 µg/L

Beryllium Minimum Detectable 0.50 67 µg/L

Boron (total) Measured 340 45000 µg/L

Cadmium Measured 0.17 2.7 µg/L

Chromium Total Minimum Detectable 5.0 810 µg/L

Chromium VI Minimum Detectable 5.0 140 µg/L

Cobalt Measured 0.83 66 µg/L

Copper Minimum Detectable 1.0 87 µg/L

Lead Measured 0.83 25 µg/L

Molybdenum Measured 49 9200 µg/L

Nickel Measured 3.6 490 µg/L

Selenium Minimum Detectable 2.0 63 µg/L

Silver Minimum Detectable 0.10 1.5 µg/L

Sodium Measured 260000 2300000 µg/L

Thallium Minimum Detectable 0.050 510 µg/L

Uranium Measured 1.3 420 µg/L

Vanadium Measured 2.8 250 µg/L

Zinc Minimum Detectable 5.0 1100 µg/L

Mercury Minimum Detectable 0.1 0.29 µg/L

Acetone Measured 160 130000 µg/L

Benzene Measured 0.22 44 µg/L

Bromodichloromethane Minimum Detectable 0.50 85000 µg/L

Bromoform Minimum Detectable 1.0 380 µg/L

Bromomethane Minimum Detectable 0.50 5.6 µg/L

Carbon Tetrachloride Minimum Detectable 0.20 0.79 µg/L

Chlorobenzene Minimum Detectable 0.20 630 µg/L

Chloroform Minimum Detectable 0.20 2.4 µg/L

Dibromochloromethane Minimum Detectable 0.50 82000 µg/L


Owner Information







ESA Information








StandardUnit Of

Measure

Dichlorodifluoromethane Minimum Detectable 1.0 4400 µg/L

Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- Minimum Detectable 0.50 4600 µg/L



Dichloroethane, 1,1- Minimum Detectable 0.20 320 µg/L

Dichloroethane, 1,2- Minimum Detectable 0.50 1.6 µg/L

Dichloroethylene, 1,1- Minimum Detectable 0.20 1.6 µg/L

Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- Minimum Detectable 0.50 1.6 µg/L

Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- Minimum Detectable 0.50 1.6 µg/L

Dichloropropane, 1,2- Minimum Detectable 0.20 16 µg/L

Dichloropropene,1,3- Minimum Detectable 0.40 5.2 µg/L

Ethylbenzene Minimum Detectable 0.20 2300 µg/L

Hexane (n) Minimum Detectable 1.0 51 µg/L

Methyl Ethyl Ketone Minimum Detectable 10 470000 µg/L

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone Minimum Detectable 5.0 140000 µg/L

Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) Minimum Detectable 0.50 190 µg/L

Methylene Chloride Minimum Detectable 2.0 610 µg/L

Styrene Minimum Detectable 0.50 1300 µg/L

Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- Minimum Detectable 0.50 3.3 µg/L

Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- Minimum Detectable 0.50 3.2 µg/L

Tetrachloroethylene Minimum Detectable 0.20 1.6 µg/L

Toluene Measured 0.79 18000 µg/L

Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- Minimum Detectable 0.20 640 µg/L

Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- Minimum Detectable 0.50 4.7 µg/L

Trichloroethylene Minimum Detectable 0.20 1.6 µg/L

Trichlorofluoromethane Minimum Detectable 0.50 2500 µg/L

Vinyl Chloride Minimum Detectable 0.20 0.5 µg/L

Xylene Mixture Measured 0.36 4200 µg/L

Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** Minimum Detectable 25 750 µg/L

Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 Minimum Detectable 100 150 µg/L


Owner Information







ESA Information








StandardUnit Of

Measure




Owner Information







ESA Information





Contaminants Measured in Sediments

Owner Information







ESA Information



Has sediment sampling been conducted at the property?

Yes

No

*



Laboratory InformationLaboratory Name *

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics

Owner Information







ESA Information




ESA Information

ESA ReportsPhase One ESA Reports

The date the last work on the records review, interviews and site reconnaissancecomponents of the phase one environmental site assessment was done.

2013/08/22 *

Type of Report * Report Title * Date of Report* Author of Report *Name of ConsultingOrganization

Phase One ESA Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1205 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario2013/10/16 Frank C. Colozza, Horace Lee, Frank MarcocciaJFM Environmental Limited

Owner Information




ESA Information

Phase One ESA Reports

Phase Two ESA Reports

Phase One Reports and Other Documents

Phase Two Reports and Other Documents




ESA Information

ESA ReportsPhase Two ESA Reports

The date the last work on the planning of the site investigation and conducting the siteinvestigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done.

2013/10/15 *

Type of Report * Report Title * Date of Report* Author of Report *Name of ConsultingOrganization

Phase Two ESA Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Lands To Be Conveyed To The City Of Toronto From 1205 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario2013/07/25 Frank C. Colozza, Horace Lee, Frank MarcocciaJFM Environmental Limited

Update to Phase Two ESA Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 1205 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario2013/10/21 Frank C. Colozza, Horace Lee, Frank MarcocciaJFM Environmental Limited

Owner Information




ESA Information








ESA Information

Reports and Other DocumentsPhase 1 Reports and Other Documents

List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 1 ESA relied on in certifyingthe information set out in Section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 1 ESA

Report Title Date of Report Author of Report Name of ConsultingOrganization for Report

Owner Information




ESA Information








ESA Information

Reports and Other DocumentsPhase 2 Reports and Other Documents

List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 2 ESA relied on in makingany certifications in the RSC in relation to the Phase 2 ESA or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 2 ESA

Report Title Date of Report Author of Report Name of ConsultingOrganization for Report

Owner Information




ESA Information








QP InformationFirst Name

Frank* Middle Name

C.

Last Name

Colozza*

Which one of the following licences underthe Professional Engineers Act do you hold? *

Which one of the following memberships underthe Professional Geoscientists Act do you hold? *

Practising Member

Membership Number

0027*

Is the QP Employed?

Yes

No

* Employer Name

JFM Environmental Limited*

QP Contact InformationPhone Number

(519) 951-9191* Fax Number

(519) 452-3089* Email

[email protected]*

QP Mailing Address InformationStreet Number * Street Name * Apt No. / RR No.

318 Neptune Crescent

City, Town or Village * Province * Postal Code *

London Ontario N6M 1A1

Owner Information




ESA Information


QP Information



QP Certification Statement DAs the qualified person, I certify that: *

A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the informationgathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, hasbeen conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person asrequired by the regulation.

A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of theinformation gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required,has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person asrequired by the regulation.

The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling onlyand the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.

As of 2013/10/15, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmentalsite assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling,there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or underthe RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC propertywill be put, as specified in the RSC.

Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition,given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to theclerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tiermunicipality in which the property is located.

As of 2013/10/15, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phasetwo environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets theapplicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulationfor all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for whichthis RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, MaximumContaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.

As of 2013/10/15, the maximum known concentration of each contaminantin soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has beenperformed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared toApplicable Site Condition Standards.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of sitecondition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry containsa notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their owndue diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing informationin the Registry.

The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generallyaccepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or scienceprofession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.

I do not hold and have not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based

To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSCare true as of 2013/10/15.

By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

I, the qualified person named below, on the date stated below, make all of the stated certifications applicable tothe qualified person in this Part of the record of site condition.

Frank C. Colozza

2013/10/22

Owner Information




ESA Information



QP Certification Statement

Owner Certification Statement


Owner Certification StatementOwner Information




ESA Information



QP Certification Statement



Click here to download Firm, Corp, Other Form

Owner Information




ESA Information





Supporting DocumentsPlease note, only PDF attachments will be accepted with the exception of theProperty Specific Standard, which must be an Excel document.

Certificate of Status or equivalent

StatusCertificate-1493201OL.pdf

*

Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Lawyer's Letter of Legal Description for 1205 Queen Street W, Toronto, ON.pdf

*

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s)

Title Chain for 1205 Queen Street West, Toronto, ON.pdf

*

A Current plan of Survey

Plan of Survey for 1205 Queen Street W, Toronto, ON.pdf

*

A copy of No Objection Statement from municipality

Toronto Non-Potable Standard Acceptable Letter October 8, 2013.pdf

*


Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern.pdf

*

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property.pdf

*

Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model

ESA2 CSM Blank Page for RSC Filing.pdf

*


Owner Certification October 18, 2013.pdf

*

Request ID: 015815239 Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2013/10/18 Demande n° : Province de l'Ontario Document produit le : Transaction ID: 52404680 Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 12:00:52 Transaction n° : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à : Category ID: CT Catégorie :

CERTIFICATE OF STATUS ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE

This is to certify that according to the D'après les dossiers du Ministère des records of the Ministry of Government Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons Services que la société

1 4 9 3 2 0 1 O N T A R I O L I M I T E D

Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario) 0 0 1 4 9 3 2 0 1 is a corporation incorporated, est une société constituée, prorogée ou née amalgamated or continued under d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la the laws of the Province of Ontario. Province de l'Ontario.

The corporation came into existence on La société a été fondée le S E P T E M B E R 1 9 S E P T E M B R E , 2 0 0 1 and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute.

Dated Fait le O C T O B E R 1 8 O C T O B R E , 2 0 1 3

Director Directrice

The issuance of this certificate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services.La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.

To view Order Summary for this transaction,

check the check box for this request and click the 'Order Summary' button.

Please note that this is a summary usage for this particular request and is not an Invoice.

Invoices will be provided as a combined total of all transactions on a monthly basis.

The Monthly Invoice can be viewed from the Statement of Account in the Accounting area.

Frank

Line

Frank

Line

Frank

Line

Frank

Line

Frank

Rectangle

Frank

Sticky Note

Unmarked set by Frank

Frank

Typewritten Text

PHASE ONE ESA, PHASE TWO ESA, AND RSC PROPERTY BOUNDARY

Frank

Line

TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)

TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

AREA OF

POTENTIAL

ENVIRONMENTAL

CONCERN1

LOCATION OF

AREA OF

POTENTIAL

ENVIRONMENTAL

CONCERN ON

PHASE 1

PROPERTY

POTENTIALLY

CONTAMINATING

ACTIVITY2

LOCATION

OF PCA

(ON-SITE

OR OFF-

SITE)

CONTAMINANTS OF

POTENTIAL CONCERN3

MEDIA POTENTIALLY

IMPACTED

(GROUNDWATER, SOIL

AND/OR SEDIMENT)

APEC #1

Southern Portion & North Eastern Corner of the Phase 1 Property.

#30 – Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality.

PCA#1, On-Site, Southern & North East Corner of Site

-Metals and Inorganics -PAHs -VOCs -PCBs -PHCs

SOIL

APEC #2

North East Portion of the Phase 1 Property.

#28 Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks

PCA#2, On-Site, North East Portion of the Site.

-Metals -PHCs -VOCs

GW, SOIL

APEC #3

Central Portion of the Phase 1 Property.

#49 Salvage Yard, including automobile wrecking

PCA#3, On-Site, Central Portion of the Site.

-Metals -PHCs -VOCs

GW, SOIL

APEC #3




-Metals -PHCs -VOCs

GW, SOIL

APEC #4

Northern Portion of the Phase 1 Property.


PCA#5, Off-Site, North of the Site.

-Metals -PHCs -VOCs

GW, SOIL

APEC #5

Southern Portion of the Phase 1 Property.

#17 Dye Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage

PCA#6, Off-Site, South of the Site.

-VOCs

GW, SOIL

APEC #6

Western Portion of the Phase 1 Property.


PCA#7, Off-Site, West of the Site.

-Metals -PHCs -VOCs

GW, SOIL

Notes: 1 – Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present, as determined through the phase one environmental site assessment, including through, (a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and (b) identification of potentially contaminating activity.

2 – Potentially contaminating activity means use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a phase one study area. 3 - when completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the "Protocol for in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below: ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical Conductivity SAR CPs PAHs As, Sb, Se Cr (VI) 1,4-Dioxane THMs Na Hg Dioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B-HWS Methyl Mercury VOCs BTEX Cl high pH PHCs Ca, Mg CN low pH 4 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached

of 2TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY(Refer to Clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04)

Year Name of Owner / Tenant Description ofProperty Use Property Use1

Other Observations from AerialPhotographs, Fire Insurance,Etc.

Prior to 1812 Crown Patent Vacant UndevelopedLands

Agricultural orOther Use

No Information available prior to1812

James BrockSusannah Luch Quirke BrockWilliam Charels GwynneEliza Elizabeth Ann Anne GwynneToronto House Building AssociationRosannah Rosanna MooreRosannah Rosanna BloombergUnion HotelsWhite, G; Johnson, W.Hughes, J. Little, M.,

The Credit Foncier Franco Canadian

William Wallace LundyWilliam E. PepallGeorge T. PepallEdith L. PepallJames E. GrahamSamuel WeberDavid DunkelmanMaurice CohenLillie CohenJoseph RummCharles PasternackRebecca MaldaverDavid G. DavidsonMargaret McGeeDoyles, L.

Ernest W. Murchison

1940 British Canadian Wreckers Wrecker Commercial Based on 1940 City Directory.

Theddor E. Cherniawski

George T. TurnerShell Oil Company of CanadaSun Life Assurance Company of CanadaGrand James Service StationCNR

Harrington's Auto Service

Good Earth Developments LimitedKimberly Lloyed Developments Limited

Metric Properties Inc.

Rolade Realties Limited713507 Ontario LimitedArgos Developments Inc.Michael Le Investments LimitedTuyen NguyenTeba Investments LimitedL. and S. Investments Inc.866806 Ontario Limited

1144621 Ontario Inc.

Commercial Plaza withRetail OperationsNote: Site demolishedin 2012

Notes:1 - for each owner, specify one of the following types of property use (as defined in O.Reg. 153/04) that applies:Agricultural or other useCommercial use

Based on Chain of Title and1902, 1915, 1928 City Directory

Gas Service Station /Auto Mechanic

October 1, 2011 to present1493201 Ontario Limited Commercial Based on Chain of Title andinformation from Client.

1985 to 2001 Commercial Plaza withRetail Operations Commercial Based on Chain of Title and City

Directories.

1978 to 1985Site buildings appearto be demolished in1985.

Commercial Based on Chain of Title and1985Aerial Photograph

Based on City Directories, Chainof Title, 1933 and 1941 FIP

1947-1978 Commercial Based on Chain of Title, 1969FIP, and City Directories.

1896 to 1928Hotel is no longerlisted; and residentialtenants

Commercial andResidential Use

1934-1941 Chette, L Contractor’s Yard Commercial

1881 to 1896 A hotel, a stable andresidential use.

Commercial andResidential Use

Based Chain of Title 1890,1891City Directory

1812 to 1881 Vacant UndevelopedLands

Agricultural orOther Use

Based on Chain of Title fromRecords maintained by LandRegistry

of 2Community useIndustrial useParkland useResidential use2 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached

318 Neptune Crescent, Unit No. 1, London ON N6M 1A1 CANADA Tel: +1 519 951 9191 ● Fax: +1 519 452 3089 E-mail: [email protected]

JFMEL.COM JFM Environmental Limited

Phase Two Conceptual Site Model for 1205 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario This section presents a Conceptual Site Model (CSM) providing information related to the Site’s geological and hydrogeological conditions, areas of potential environmental concern / potential contaminating activities, the presence and distribution of potential contaminants of concern, contaminant fate and transport, receptors and potential exposure pathways. The presentation of the Phase II CSM makes reference to the following drawings attached:

Figure 1: Study Area & Areas of Potential Environmental Concerns

Figure 2: Site Plan & Soil Impact Areas

Figure 3: Borehole / Monitoring Well Location Plan and Groundwater Contours

Figure 4: Cross Section A-A’ & Cross Section B-B’

Figure 5: Analytical Results Prior to Remediation

Figure 6: Approximate Location of Clearance Soil Samples

Figure 7: Human Health & Ecological Conceptual on-Site Model Site Description The Phase One Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), phase Two ESA, and Record of Site Condition (RSC) property herein after referred to as the “Site” is situated on the south west corner of the intersection of Dufferin Street and Queen Street West, in the City of Toronto, Ontario (c.f. Figure 1). The Site measured approximately 0.146 hectares (0.362 acres). At the time of the investigation, the Site had been recently excavated and shored to depths of approximately 4.5 m to approximately 7.5 m BGS and as a result there was no fill present within the Site and within the shored walls that were present along the entire perimeter of the Site. There was however, an un-excavated triangular shaped parcel at the north eastern limits of the Site and a narrow strip of un-excavated soil / fill along the southern limits of the Site, north east and south of the vertical shoring, respectively. These two areas of un-excavated shallow soil / fill and shored wall are the parts of the Site that are to be Conveyed to the City of Toronto as part of the re-development of the Site. According to available aerial photographs, chain of title information, historical maps, and other records review, the Site was first developed circa 1890. Various industrial and commercial tenants have occupied it until 2012. The Site building was demolished in 2012 and will be re-developed for residential and commercial / retail purposes. Site Conditions The Site is located in a developed residential and commercial area where potable water is supplied by the City of Toronto and the potable water is taken from Lake Ontario. Therefore, the MOE Table 3 Site Condition Standards (SCS) has been applied to the Site. A confirmation letter dated October 8, 2013 was

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 1493201 Ontario Limited JFM12913 1205 Queen Street West, Toronto ON October 21, 2013

JFMEL.COM 2 JFM Environmental Limited

received from The City of Toronto’s Engineering and Construction Services stating that no objection to non-potable groundwater Site Condition Standard being applied for the Site. In accordance with Section 41 of Ontario Regulation 153/04 as amended (Regulation), the Site is not an environmentally sensitive area. The Site is not located within an area of natural significance and it does not include land that is within 30 metres of a body of water. As such, Section 41 and 43.1 of the Regulation do not apply to the Site. Upon completion of the Phase Two ESA investigation, no soils have been brought to the Phase Two property, which did not originate at the Phase Two property. Geological Setting Based on information provided on the physiographic, geological and topographic maps, the Site is located in the physiographic region known as the Sand Plains. The surface soils in this physiographic region are predominantly composed of Halton tills (clayey silt till) overlying bedrock shale belonging to the Georgian Bay Formation. The regional groundwater flow is inferred to be in a southerly direction towards Lake Ontario approximately 2 km to the south of the Site. The location of the geological cross-sections prepared from the Site boreholes is shown in Figure 2. The geological cross-sections illustrating the Site stratigraphy are presented in Figure 4. The general stratigraphy at the Site, as observed in boreholes and inferred from other boreholes that were previously advanced at the Site, consists of sand and gravel, sand fill material, overlying native sandy silt / silty sand, silt till and shale bedrock. The depth of the Shale bedrock varied from approximately 7 m to approximately 9.5 m below grade. Hydrogeological Setting The depth to groundwater in the three monitoring wells installed on-Site ranged between approximately 4.7 m to approximately 8.3 m below grade and indicated that there was a southerly groundwater flow in the Silt layer overlying the Shale layer as illustrated in Figure 3. The regional groundwater flow is to the south towards Lake Ontario located approximately 2 km to the south of the Site. Based on the groundwater elevation contours, the horizontal hydraulic gradient was calculated at 0.178 in the southerly direction, as shown in Figure 3. The vertical hydraulic gradient was not calculated during this work program and has been assumed to have a down ward direction. Prior to remedial activities, the contaminants were identified in the overburden soil / fill but not in the groundwater. The soil / fill impacts have subsequently been excavated and removed from the Site. There were no contaminants identified in the groundwater. Following the re-development of the Site, the building footprint will cover the entire Site. The potential exists for seasonal fluctuations in the groundwater table due to climatic or meteorological conditions; however, given that the future building footprint will cover the Site, the potential for surface water infiltration will be negligible. As a result, any anticipated groundwater fluctuations should not affect groundwater levels and flow direction significantly.



Underground Utilities Underground utilities, including sewer and gas lines, are located along the east and north side of the Site. The Site redevelopment will involve excavations to considerable depths (greater than 6 m) below the existing utilities to accommodate the construction of the proposed underground structure. As such, the underground utilities are not considered a concern to influence groundwater flow and transport of on-Site or off-Site contaminants. Underground utilities have been known to affect the vapour transport of contaminants. The entire overburden soil and groundwater, including the impacted volumes, have been removed from the Site. Consequently, it is unlikely that there will be vapour intrusion of contaminants into the future building. Potential Contaminating Activities & Area of Potential Environmental Concern As per Ontario Regulation 153/04, as amended, a Potential Contaminating Activity (PCA) is defines as one of the 59 industrial operations set out in Table 2 of Schedule D that occurs or has occurred on the Site or within the Phase One ESA study area. Based on the Phase One ESA, the relevant PCAs at the Site and the Phase I ESA study area included the following: 1. Historic industrial uses consisted of a contractors yard, a wrecking yard, an automotive repair facility,

a gasoline service station and impacted fill material identified during previous subsurface investigations at the Site; and,

2. Historic industrial uses consisted of an automotive repair facility, a dyeing and finishing operation and

a wrecking operation at various properties within Phase One ESA study area.

The identified areas of potential environmental concern (APEC), the potential contaminating Activities (PCA) and potential contaminants of concern (PCOCs) on-Site or within the Phase One ESA study area (250 metre radius surrounding the Site) are summarized below. The APECs are described in the Table below and illustrated in Figure 1 and in Figure 2. As described in the table below, the CSM identified the APECs located on the Site in relation to PCAs located both on and off the Site. The APECs and PCOCs identified for both on-site and from off-site PCAs are described below. APEC #1: The Southern Portion of the Site: The presence of fill material to depth of approximately 2 metres below ground surface was previously determined to be impacted with metal and inorganics. Over the course of the development of the Site, the importation of fill material of unknown quality may have been deposited at the Site and a source of the PCA#1. Metals and inorganics, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), Petroleum Hydrocarbon Compounds (PHC), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) are the PCOCs at the southern portion of the Site.



APEC #2: The North Eastern Portion of the Site: The historical presence of a gasoline underground storage tank and dispensing equipment previously located approximately at the north eastern portion of the Site that was identified during the review of the Fire Insurance Plans and municipal directories is a PCA#2 from gasoline stored in a fixed tank. Metals and inorganics, PHC, and VOC are the PCOCs at the north eastern portion of the Site. APEC #3: The Central Portion of the Site: The historical presence of an auto wrecking operations and / or automotive repair facility shops previously located approximately at the central portion of the Site were identified during the review of the Fire Insurance Plans and municipal directories are PCA#3 and PCA#4, respectively. Metals and inorganics, PHC, and VOC are the PCOCs at the central portion of the Site. APEC #4: The Northern Portion of the Site: The historical presence of an auto wrecking operations previously located approximately at a nearby property to the north of the Site which was identified during the review of the Fire Insurance Plans and municipal directories is a PCA#5. Metals and inorganics, PHC, and VOC are the PCOCs at the northern portion of the Site. APEC #5: The Southern Portion of the Site: The southern portion of the Site is considered an APEC based on the vicinity of an off-site PCA on the nearby property to the south of the Site that was identified during the review of the Fire Insurance Plans and municipal directories is a PCA#6 from dye manufacturing, processing and storage operations. Metals and VOC are the PCOCs at the southern portion of the Site. APEC #6: The Western Portion of the Site: The western portion of the Site is considered an APEC based on the vicinity of an off-site PCA#7 on the abutting property to the west of the Site that was identified during the review of the Fire Insurance Plans and municipal directories is an automotive repair facility. Metals, PHC and VOC are the PCOCs at the western portion of the Site.



TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

AREA OF

POTENTIAL

ENVIRONMENTAL

CONCERN1

LOCATION OF

AREA OF

POTENTIAL

ENVIRONMENTAL

CONCERN ON

PHASE 1

PROPERTY

POTENTIALLY

CONTAMINATING

ACTIVITY2

LOCATION

OF PCA

(ON-SITE

OR OFF-SITE)

CONTAMINANTS OF

POTENTIAL CONCERN3

MEDIA POTENTIALLY

IMPACTED

(GROUNDWATER, SOIL

AND/OR SEDIMENT)

APEC #1

Southern Portion & North Eastern Corner of the Phase 1 Property.

#30 – Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality.

PCA#1, On-Site, Southern & North East Corner of Site

-Metals and Inorganics -PAHs -VOCs -PCBs -PHCs

SOIL

APEC #2

North East Portion of the Phase 1 Property.


PCA#2, On-Site, North East Portion of the Site.

-Metals -PHCs -VOCs

GW, SOIL

APEC #3




-Metals -PHCs -VOCs

GW, SOIL

APEC #3




-Metals -PHCs -VOCs

GW, SOIL

APEC #4

Northern Portion of the Phase 1 Property.


PCA#5, Off-Site, North of the Site.

-Metals -PHCs -VOCs

GW, SOIL

APEC #5

Southern Portion of the Phase 1 Property.

#17 Dye Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage

PCA#6, Off-Site, South of the Site.

-VOCs

GW, SOIL

APEC #6

Western Portion of the Phase 1 Property.


PCA#7, Off-Site, West of the Site.

-Metals -PHCs -VOCs

GW, SOIL

Notes: 1 – Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present, as determined through the phase one environmental site assessment, including through, (a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and (b) identification of potentially contaminating activity. 2 – Potentially contaminating activity means use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a phase one study area. 3 - when completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the "Protocol for in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below: ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical Conductivity SAR CPs PAHs As, Sb, Se Cr (VI) 1,4-Dioxane THMs Na Hg Dioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B-HWS Methyl Mercury VOCs BTEX Cl high pH PHCs Ca, Mg CN low pH 4 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached



Phase Two ESA Summary

The Phase Two ESA was conducted to assess the environmental quality of the soil and groundwater at the Site. As indicated in the APEC and PCOC Table presented above, the analytical program of the Phase Two ESA included testing of soil and / or groundwater for VOCs, PHCs, PAHs, PCBs and metals and inorganics from the boreholes and monitoring wells installed on-Site. Soil samples from 9 boreholes (BH1, BH2, BH3, BH4, BH5, BH6, BH1/MW, BH2/MW and BH3/MW) and groundwater samples from 3 monitoring wells (BH1/MW, BH2/MW and BH3/MW) were submitted for chemical analysis to address the PCA that are indicated in the APEC and PCOC presented above. More specifically, Boreholes BH1 to BH6 inclusive were advanced to assess APEC #1. Borehole BH3(MW) was advanced to assess APEC #2. Boreholes BH1(MW), BH2(MW) and BH3(MW) were advanced to asses APEC #3. Boreholes BH2(MW) and BH3(MW) were advanced on Site to assess APEC #4. Boreholes BH1(MW) and BH2(MW) were advanced to assess APEC #5 and APEC #6, respectively. The borehole and monitoring well locations are illustrated in Figure 2.

Contaminants of Concern (COC)

For the purpose of this Phase Two CSM, COCs were identified by screening analytical results reported for the soil and groundwater samples collected at the Phase Two property against the selected criteria of MOE (2011) Table 3 Generic Site Condition Standards in a non-potable groundwater condition for Residential / Parkland / Institutional land use in coarse textured soil, as presented in “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for use under part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act”, dated April 15, 2011.

Based on the soil analytical results, metals and inorganic parameters (i.e. Boron (Hot Water Extractable (HWE)), cadmium, lead, conductivity, and sodium absorption ratio) within the soil were the contaminants detected at the Phase Two property at concentrations above the applicable Table 3 SCS. As such, metals and inorganics are carried forward as COCs in soil. Figure 2, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 illustrates the distribution of COCs in soil. The shallow soil / fill at the southern limits of the Site, beyond the vertical shoring, were contaminated with several heavy metals and inorganics, which included, but were not limited to, Cadmium, Lead, hot water extractable Boron, Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) and Conductivity. The heavy metal and inorganics contaminated shallow soil / fill at the southern limits of the Site (i.e. at the BH1 and BH3 locations) extended to a depth of approximately 2 metres BGS. In addition, the soil at the borehole BH1(MW) location was contaminated with hot water extractable Boron to a level requiring remediation. The hot water extractable Boron contamination at the BH1(MW) location extended to depths of approximately 0.3 metres to 0.6 metres BGS. The locations and the lateral extent of the two areas impacted with heavy metal and inorganic parameters at the Site are illustrated in Figure 2, Figure 5 and Figure 6. The vertical extent of the two areas impacted with heavy metals and inorganic parameters at the Site are illustrated in Figure 4.

Based on the groundwater analytical results, no contaminants were detected in the groundwater at the Phase Two property at concentrations above the applicable Table 3 SCS. As such, no contaminants were carried forward as COCs in groundwater.

The potential source of the metals and inorganic soil impacts within the fill material is likely associated with the fill material that was deposited at the Site. However, the soil / fill impacts at the Site have been



remediated; the potential for discharge of the COCs from the Site and off-Site migration of into the natural environment is unlikely. Remediation Actions

Results of the Phase II ESA at the Site found the presence of impacted soils, which exceeded the applicable MOE Standards. The objective of the remediation program was to restore the Site to the MOE Standards for the proposed residential use which required the excavation and off-Site disposal of impacted soil that was conducted at the Site. The remedial excavation was conducted under oversight of Qualified Persons (QP) of JFM Environmental Limited. The remaining non-impacted soil material was excavated just above or at the shale bedrock and disposed of off-Site.

As part of the remediation activities, confirmatory soil samples were collected from the excavation limits. Confirmatory floor samples and wall samples were collected and analyzed for exceeding parameters to verify the depth and the extent of the soil contamination. Confirmatory soil samples were collected from the floors and walls of the excavations for metals and inorganics analysis to demonstrate that the Site satisfies the applicable MOE Site Condition Standards. Confirmation soil sampling was undertaken after all impacted / contaminated soils were removed from the Site. Thirteen (13) floor and wall samples were collected to confirm the depth and extent of the soil contamination. Four (4) samples of the soil / fill material used to infill the remedial excavation at the southern limits of the Site were collected to verify the environmental quality of the earthen fill imported to the Site (c.f. Figure 6). The location of the confirmatory soil samples of the remedial excavation undertaken for the Boron (HWE) impact at the BH1(MW) location is illustrated in Figure 6. The areal extent of the final excavated area was approximately 9 square meters (3m x 3m) to depth of approximately 0.3 metres to approximately 0.6 metres below grade. As illustrated in Figure 6 the two wall samples (SS3 and SS8) and two floor samples (SS6 and SS7) confirm that the boron (HWE) impact at the BH1(MW) location was remediated to meet the MOE SCS and to comply with the number of floor and wall samples required for an remedial excavation of less than 25 square meters. The location of the confirmatory soil samples of the remedial excavation of shallow soil / fill impacted with cadmium, lead, conductivity, and sodium absorption ratio at the southern limits of the Site is illustrated in Figure 6. Soil samples SS9, SS10 and SS11 collected at approximately 1.5 metres below ground surface were reported to have failed SAR and / or EC at these locations. This area was excavated to a depth of approximately 2 metres below ground surface and additional confirmatory samples were collected (i.e. SS12, SS13, SS14) to replace the previous samples that had failed SAR and / or EC (SS9, SS10, SS11). As illustrated in Figure 6, samples SS12, SS13 and SS14 confirm that the cadmium, lead, conductivity, and SAR impacts were previously present have been removed and the confirmatory sampling confirms that the cadmium, lead, conductivity, and SAR impacted soil / fill at the southern limits of the Site meet the MOE SCS. The investigation and confirmatory sampling were conducted to meet the requirements and objectives of a Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment. Based on the results of the Phase Two ESA, all known impacted material has been removed from the Site.



Based on the analytical results of the groundwater sampling from monitoring well installed above bedrock, the concentrations of COCs in groundwater were below the applicable MOE Table 3 SCS.

Contaminant Fate and Transport Metals and Inorganics in Soil The chemical constituents identified in the shallow soil at the Site comprise Boron (Hot Water Extractable (HWE)), cadmium, lead, conductivity, and sodium absorption ratio. The relevant transport mechanisms for the COCs in soil are via leaching and mixing with groundwater chemical constituents by advection, mechanical dispersion and molecular diffusion along groundwater flow paths. The transport of these solutes in groundwater will be retarded by sorption and ion exchange mechanisms (i.e. metal ions) depending on the surface characteristics of the soil mineral particles and the exchangeable cations present. As a result, due to retardation effects by sorption / ion exchange and other mechanisms, the estimated linear groundwater velocity is likely overestimated, and the actual contaminant velocity at the Site is anticipated to be significantly lower. Given that the impacted soil has been remediated and is no longer present on-Site, there is no transport pathway for the above mentioned COC. Human Health Receptors and Exposure Pathways The Site is to be used for residential purposes in the foreseeable future, with the presence of some vegetation in the form of landscaped boulevards. Therefore, the potential on-Site human receptors that may be present comprise property residents (adult, teen, child, toddler and infant), property visitors (adult, teen, child, toddler and infant), short-term / maintenance (outdoor) workers and long-term (indoor) workers. Construction workers are also considered in the event of subsurface works at the Site. The potentially complete on-Site exposure pathways considered for property residents, property visitors and long-term workers include soil particulate inhalation, soil dermal contact, incidental soil ingestion and the inhalation of indoor air containing COCs released to soil gas (sourced from soil or groundwater) and migrating through the unsaturated zone to the building indoor air space. The potentially complete pathways for short-term workers include soil particulate inhalation, soil dermal contact, incidental soil ingestion and the inhalation of outdoor air containing COCs released to soil gas (sourced from soil or groundwater) and migrating through the unsaturated zone to the ambient environment. Finally, the potentially complete pathways for construction workers include soil particulate inhalation, soil dermal contact, incidental soil ingestion of heavy metal particulates released to the ambient environment while performing ground intrusive works at the Site. The relevant human health exposure pathways for the contaminants present on the Site prior to the remediation are illustrated in Figure 7. The relevant human health exposure pathways are inferred to be minimal given that the impacted soil has been remediated and is no longer present on-Site. Ecological Receptors and Exposure Pathways

The current residential / commercial land use of the Site is to be continued in the foreseeable future. Therefore, the potential on-Site ecological receptors that may be present comprise terrestrial vegetation, soil invertebrates, terrestrial birds and terrestrial mammals. It is noted that the Site is located with a



heavily urbanized part of the City of Toronto, where natural habitat is scarce, and the ecological receptors potentially present at the Site will be limited to urban / human-tolerant species. The potentially complete on-Site exposure pathways considered for terrestrial vegetation is via root uptake of soil (direct contact). The potentially complete pathways for soil invertebrates are via soil dermal contact and ingestion (direct contact) and soil particulate inhalation (direct contact). The potentially complete pathways for terrestrial birds and mammals are via soil dermal contact and incidental ingestion (direct contact), soil particulate inhalation (direct contact) and tissue residue ingestion (indirect contact). The relevant ecological exposure pathways for COC that were present before the remediation undertaken at the Site are presented in Figure 7. The relevant ecological exposure pathways are inferred to be minimal given that the impacted soil has been remediated and is no longer present on-Site.

PHASE ONE ESA, PHASE TWO ESA, ANDRSC PROPERTY BOUNDARY

CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL - STUDY AREA

0 250

METRES

SCALE (1:3,438)

LEGEND

STUDY AREA

OCTOBER 2013

PROJECT #JFM12913

FIGURE 1

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT1205 QUEEN STREET WEST

TORONTO, ONTARIO

SITE ASSESSMENTS

REMEDIATION

www.jfmel.com

RAILWAY

PARKLAND

RESIDENTIAL LAND USE

AREA OF POTENTIALENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATING ACTIVITY

COMMUNITY LAND USE

INDUSTRIAL LAND USE

250 m250 m

COMMERCIAL LAND USE

PHASE ONE ESA, PHASE TWO ESA,AND RSC PROPERTY BOUNDARY

CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL - SITE

LEGEND

OCTOBER 2013

PROJECT #JFM12913

FIGURE 2


TORONTO, ONTARIO

SITE ASSESSMENTS

REMEDIATION

www.jfmel.com

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFBOREHOLE “BH1”

BH1BH1

0 20

METRES

SCALE (1:375)

BH1(MW)BH1(MW)

BH2(MW)BH2(MW)

BH3(MW)BH3(MW)

SITE EXCAVATED TO APPROXIMATELY4.5 METRES BELOW GROUND SURFACE



POURED CONCRETESUPPORTING WALL / SHORING

FILL FROM 0 TO ~ 1.5 METRES BELOW GROUND SURFACEIMPACTED WITH VARIOUS METALS & INORGANICS

BH6BH6

BH5BH5

BH1BH1 BH3BH3 BH4BH4

AA

A’A’

BB

B’B’

BH2BH2

AA A’A’ CROSS SECTION LINE A - A’

BORON (HOT WATEREXTRACTABLE) 2.6 μg/g @7.5 METRES BELOWGROUND SURFACE

BORON (HOT WATEREXTRACTABLE) 2.6 μg/g @7.5 METRES BELOWGROUND SURFACE


GROUNDWATER CONFIGURATION (2012-11-15)

LEGEND

OCTOBER 2013

PROJECT #JFM12913

FIGURE 3


TORONTO, ONTARIO

SITE ASSESSMENTS

REMEDIATION

www.jfmel.com

0 20

METRES

SCALE (1:375)

BH1(MW)BH1(MW)

BH2(MW)BH2(MW)

BH3(MW)BH3(MW)

BH6BH6

BH5BH5

BH1BH1 BH3BH3 BH4BH4BH2BH2

94.694.6

95.095.0

94.294.2

93.893.8

93.493.4

93.093.0

92.692.6

92.292.2

91.891.891.891.8

92.292.2

92.692.6

93.093.0

93.493.4

93.893.8

94.294.2

94.694.6

95.095.0

92.692.6APPROXIMATE GROUNDWATER ELEVATION - NOVEMBER 15, 2012(METRES ABOVE AN ARBITRARY DATUM)

- (95.33)- (95.33)

- (91.67)- (91.67)

(93.33) -(93.33) -

INFERRED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION

LEGEND

SILT

SAND FILL SHALE BEDROCK

DISTANCE ALONG BASELINE (M)

EL

EV

AT

ION

(ME

TR

ES

AB

OV

EA

NA

RB

ITR

AR

YD

AT

UM

96

98

100

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION (NOVEMBER 15, 2012)

SITE ASSESSMENTS

REMEDIATION

www.jfmel.com OCTOBER 2013

PROJECT #JFM12913

FIGURE 4


TORONTO, ONTARIO

INTERPRETED STRATIGRAPHIC

CROSS SECTIONS A - A’ AND B - B’

94

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

SURFACE ELEVATION

INTERPOLATED BOUNDARY OF GEOLOGICAL UNIT

NO DATA ON BOUNDARY OF GEOLOGICAL UNIT??

DISTANCE ALONG BASELINE (M)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

92

90

88

102

EL

EV

AT

ION

(ME

TR

ES

AB

OV

EA

NA

RB

ITR

AR

YD

AT

UM

96

98

100

94

92

90

88

102

AA A’A’ BB B’B’

BH

1

BH

2

BH

3

BH

4

BH

6

BH

5

BH

3(M

W)

BH

1(M

W)

BH

1(M

W) BH

2(M

W)

BH

2(M

W)

BH

1(M

W)

BH

1(M

W)

BH

3(M

W)

BH

3

BH

4

BH

5

BH

1

BH

2

BH

6

?? ?? ???

??????????

?? ?? ??

????????????

SITE BOUNDARIES

CONCRETE SHORING

BH

2(M

W)

BH

2(M

W)

EX

TE

NT

OF

RE

ME

DIA

L

EX

CA

VA

TIO

N(B

OR

ON

(HW

E))

EX

TE

NT

OF

RE

ME

DIA

L

EX

CA

VA

TIO

N(B

OR

ON

(HW

E))

EXTENT OF REMEDIAL EXCAVATION

(CADMIUM, LEAD, ELECTRICAL,

CONDUCTIVITY, SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO)




EX

TE

NT

OF

RE

ME

DIA

L

EX

CA

VA

TIO

N(B

OR

ON

(HW

E))

EX

TE

NT

OF

RE

ME

DIA

L

EX

CA

VA

TIO

N(B

OR

ON

(HW

E))








ANALYTICAL RESULTS PRIOR TO REMEDIATIONLEGEND

OCTOBER 2013

PROJECT #JFM12913

FIGURE 5


TORONTO, ONTARIO

SITE ASSESSMENTS

REMEDIATION

www.jfmel.com

0 20

METRES

SCALE (1:375)

BH1(MW)BH1(MW)

BH2(MW)BH2(MW)

BH3(MW)BH3(MW)

BH6BH6

BH5BH5


ALLPARAMETERSANALYZEDREPORTEDATLEVELS

LESSTHANTHEAPPLICABLESTANDARDS*

ALLPARAMETERSANALYZEDREPORTEDATLEVELS

LESSTHANTHEAPPLICABLESTANDARDS*

BH1(MW) - BH1-SS1

Parameter Standard* (µg/g) ReportedResult (µg/g)

Boron (Hot Water Extractable) 1.5 2.6

Sample Depth:0- 0.60metresbelow groundsurface **

BH1-SS2


Sodium Adsorption Ratio 5 19

Electrical Conductivity 0.7 1.1

Cadmium 1.2 1.5

Lead 120 130

Sample Depth:0- 0.75metresbelow groundsurface

BH3-SS1


Electrical Conductivity 0.7 1.2

Boron (Hot Water Extractable) 1.5 1.6

Sample Depth:0- 0.75metresbelow groundsurface

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BOREHOLE “BH1”BH1BH1

NOTES: * Soil standards presented in the(Ministry of Environment, April 15, 2011). For

residential land use, non potable groundwater, and a coarse grain soil texture.

** At time of sampling, ground surface had been excavated to a depth of approximately 7.5 metres belowground surface at this location..

TABLE 3 Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under

Part XV.1 of the Ontario Environmental Protection Act

LOCATION SAMPLEID STATUS PARAMETERCONCENTRATION

(µg/g)

DEPTH(METRESBELOW

GROUNDSURFACE)

SS1 PASS -- -- 0.1

SS2 FAIL Boron (HWE) 2.1 0.3

SS3 PASS Boron (HWE) 1.4 0.3



SS6 PASS Boron (HWE) 1.4 0.3

SS7 PASS -- -- 0.6

SS8 PASS -- -- 0.6

SS9 FAIL SAR 9.6 1.5

SS10 FAIL SAR 12 1.5

SS11 FAIL SAR/ EC 33/ 1.3(mS/cm) 1.5

SS12 PASS -- -- 2.0

SS13 PASS -- -- 2.0

SS14 PASS -- -- 2.0

2 , 4 , 5 Excavated and replaced with 7 , 82 , 4 , 5 Excavated and replaced with 7 , 8


APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CLEARANCE SOIL SAMPLES

LEGEND

OCTOBER 2013

PROJECT #JFM12913

FIGURE 6


TORONTO, ONTARIO

SITE ASSESSMENTS

REMEDIATION

www.jfmel.com

0 20

METRES

SCALE (1:375)

BH1(MW)BH1(MW)

BH2(MW)BH2(MW)

BH3(MW)BH3(MW)

BH6BH6

BH5BH5


ALLPARAMETERSANALYZEDINCLEARANCE

SAMPLESOBTAINEDATLIMITSOFREMOVAL

EXCAVATIONREPORTEDATLEVELSLESSTHANTHE

APPLICABLESTANDARDS*

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BOREHOLE “BH1”BH1BH1

NOTES: * Soil standards presented in the(Ministry of Environment, April 15, 2011). For

residential land use, non potable groundwater, and a coarse grain soil texture.

TABLE 3 Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under

Part XV.1 of the Ontario Environmental Protection Act

99 1212 10, 1410, 14 1313 1111

11

22

33

44

55

66

77

88

99

1010

1111

1313

1212

APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL. EXCAVATIONDIMENSIONS 3 METRES X 3 METRES.

11 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CLEARANCE SOIL SAMPLE - FLOOR

(HWE)SAREC

- Hot Water Extractable- Sodium adsorption ratio- Electrical Conductivity

9 , 10 , 11 Excavated and replaced with 12 , 13 , and 149 , 10 , 11 Excavated and replaced with 12 , 13 , and 14

1 Used for TCLP1 Used for TCLP

1414

66

44

11

55

2,72,7

NOT TO SCALE

33

88

33 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CLEARANCE SOIL SAMPLE - WALL

SOURCE EXPOSUREMEDIA

EXPOSUREROUTES

SUBSURFACECONTAMINATED

SOIL / FILL MATERIAL

POTENTIALCONTAMINANT

• SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO• BORON (HOT WATER)

• ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY

SOIL

SUSPENDEDPARTICLESWIND

EROSION INHALATION

DERMALCONTACT

INGESTION

EXPOSUREPOINTS

EXCAVATION /DIGGING

EXCAVATIONWORKERS

HUMAN & ECOLOGICALRECEPTORS

ASSESSMENT OF EXPOSURE PATHWAYS

PRIOR TO REMEDIAL EXCAVATION

OCTOBER 2013

PROJECT #JFM12913

FIGURE 7


TORONTO, ONTARIO

SITE ASSESSMENTS

REMEDIATION

www.jfmel.com

LONG TERMWORKERS (ADULT)

PROPERTY VISITORS(ADULT, CHILD,

TODDLER)

TERRESTRIALVEGETATION

SOILINVERTEBRATES

MAMMALS ANDBIRDS

RECEPTOR / EXPOSUREPATHWAY IS INCOMPLETE

RECEPTOR / EXPOSUREPATHWAY IS COMPLETE

EXPOSUREBARRIERS

HARD CAP

• CADMIUM• LEAD

SUBSURFACECONTAMINATED

SOIL / FILL MATERIAL

LEACHING TOGROUNDWATER

>250 METRESTO SURFACE

WATER

GROUND-WATER

DERMALCONTACT

AQUATICRECEPTORS

INDIRECTEXPOSURE

SURFACEWATER

NONPOTABLEWATER USE

DISCHARGE

TO

SURFACEW

ATERINGESTION