pwm control strategies for multilevel inverters based on carrier redistribution technique

8/10/2019 Pwm Control Strategies for Multilevel Inverters Based on Carrier Redistribution Technique

1/13

Proceedings of the 2nd

International Conference on Current Trends in Engineering and Management ICCTEM -2014

17 19, July 2014, Mysore, Karnataka, India

119

PWM CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR MULTILEVEL INVERTERS BASED

ON CARRIER REDISTRIBUTION TECHNIQUE

S. Nagaraja Rao1, D.V. Ashok Kumar

2, Ch.Sai Babu

3

1Research Scholar, JNTUK,Kakinada (A.P), India

2Professor, Dept.of EEE, SDIT, Nandyal (A.P), India

3Professor, Dept.of EEE, JNTUK, Kakinada (A.P), India

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes three Pulse width modulated (PWM) methods based on Carrier

Redistribution Techniques that utilize the (CFD) control freedom degree of vertical offsets among

carriers. They are named as Alternate Phase Opposition Disposition (APOD), Phase Opposition

Disposition (POD) and Phase Disposition (PD). Ingeneral Pulse width modulated (PWM) techniquesof a voltage source inverter need a reference signal and carrier signal to generate the required

modulating signals for the desired output. Modifications in Modulating techniques can be considered

in two ways, namely Modified reference and Modified carrier. The existing multilevel carrier-based

pulse width modulation strategies have no special provisions to offer quality output, besides lower

order harmonics are introduced in the spectrum, especially at low switching frequencies. This paper

proposes a novel multilevel PWM strategy to corner the advantages of low frequency switching and

reduced total harmonic distortion (THD) based on Carrier Redistribution Technique. This paper also

presents the most relevant control and modulation methods by a new reference/carrier based PWM

scheme for three phase Diode Clamped Multilevel Inverter and comparing the performance of the

proposed scheme with that of the existing control schemes. Finally, the simulation results are

included to verify the effectiveness of the proposed multilevel inverter configuration using various

PWM Techniques and validate the proposed theory.

Keywords: Diode Clamped MLI, Pulse width modulation, APOD, POD, PD, Total Harmonic

Distortion.

I. INTRODUCTION

The voltage source inverters produce an output voltage or current with levels either 0 or

Vdc. They are known as the two-level inverter. To produce a quality output voltage or a current

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING &

TECHNOLOGY (IJEET)

ISSN 0976 6545(Print)

ISSN 0976 6553(Online)

Volume 5, Issue 8, August (2014), pp. 119-131

IAEME: www.iaeme.com/IJEET.asp

Journal Impact Factor (2014): 6.8310 (Calculated by GISI)

www.jifactor.com

IJEET

I A E M E


2/13




120

wave form with less amount of ripple content, they require high switching frequency. In high- power

and high-voltage applications these two level inverters, however, have some limitations in operating

at high frequency mainly due to switching losses and constraints of device ratings. These limitations

can be overcome using multilevel inverters. The multilevel inverters have drawn tremendous interest

in power industry. It may be easier to produce a high-power, high-voltage inverter with multi level

structure because of the way in which the voltage stresses are controlled in the structure.The unique structure of multilevel voltage source inverters allows them to reach high

voltages with low harmonics without use of transformers or series connected synchronized-switching

devices. As the number of voltage levels increases, the harmonic content of the output voltage wave

form decreases significantly. In general multilevel inverter can be viewed as voltage synthesizers, in

which the high output voltage is synthesized from many discrete smaller voltage levels. The main

advantages of this approach are summarized as follows:

They can generate output voltages with extremely low distortion and lower (dv/dt).

They can operate with a lower switching frequency.

Their efficiency is high (>98%) because of the minimum switching frequency.

They are suitable for medium to high power applications.

The selection of the best multilevel topology for each application is often not clear and is

subject to various engineering tradeoffs. Multilevel inversion is a power conversion strategy in which

the output voltage is obtained in steps thus bringing the output closer to a sine wave and reduces the

total harmonic distortion (THD). In general MLIs are three types they are named as diode clamped,

flying capacitor and cascaded inverters. In this paper diode clamped MLI is considered based on

their own advantages [1].

This paper presents a PWM control strategies for a seven level inverter Diode Clamped

inverter based on carrier redistribution technique. Simulation results are included to verify the

operating principle of the proposed multilevel inverters.

II.SYSTEMCONFIGURATION

Fig .1:Multilevel concept for (a) two level (b) three level and (c) n- level

Multilevel inverter structures have been developed to overcome shortcomings in solid-state

switching device ratings so they can be applied to higher voltage systems. The multilevel voltage

source inverters [2] unique structure allows them to reach high voltages with low harmonics without

the use of transformers. The general function of the multilevel inverter is to synthesize a desired ac

voltage from several levels of dc voltages as shown in Fig.1.

Table.1 compares the power component requirement per phase leg among the three

multilevel voltage source inverters mentioned above. The table shows that the number of main

switches and main diodes needed by the inverters to achieve the number of voltage levels.


3/13




121

Table.1: Component requirements per phase of m-level multilevel inverters

DevicesDiode clamped

MLI

Flying Capacitor

MLI

Cascaded H-

Bridge MLI

Main switching Devices 2(m-1) 2(m-1) 2(m-1)

Main diodes 2(m-1) 0 2(m-1)

Clamping diodes (m-1)* (m-2) (m-1)*(m-2) 0Dc Balancing

Capacitorsm-1 m-1 (m-1)/2

Balancing Capacitors 0 2(m-1) 0

III. 7-LEVEL DIODE CLAMPED INVERTER

Fig. 2:Configuration of Three-phase Diode Clamped Seven Level Inverter (DC7LI)

Fig. 2 shows a seven-level diode-clamped inverter in which the dc bus consists of six

capacitors, C1, C2, C3, C4,C5and C6. For dc-bus voltage Vdc, the voltage across each capacitor is

Vdcand each device voltage stress will be limited to one capacitor voltage level through clamping

diodes.

To explain how the staircase voltage is synthesized, the neutral point n is considered as the

output phase voltage reference point. There are seven switch combinations to synthesize seven level

output as shown in Table2.

Table.2:Switching sequence for single phase 7 level diode clamped inverter

Outputvoltage S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S1

1S2

1S3

1S4

1S5

1S6

1

0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Vdc 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

2Vdc 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

3Vdc 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0

-Vdc 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0

-2vdc 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0

-3vdc 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0


4/13




122

IV. PWM CONTROL TECHNIQUES FOR MLIs

Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) techniques for two level inverters have been studied

extensively during the past decades. Many different PWM methods have been developed to achieve

the following aims; wide linear modulation range, reduced switching loss, lesser total harmonic

distortion in the spectrum of switching waveform, easy implementation, less memory space andcomputation time on implementing in digital processors for the proposed work. A number of

modulation strategies are used in multilevel power conversion applications. They can generally be

classified into modulating signals and carrier redistribution signal.

4.1 Modulating Signal

Modulating signals can be classified into Sinusoidal PWM (SPWM), Third Harmonic

injection PWM (THPWM) and Modified Space Vector PWM (MSVPWM). These modulation

techniques are extensively studied and compared for the performance parameters with seven level

inverters.

4.1.1 Sinusoidal PWM

Fig. 3:Sinusoidal modulating signal control technique

Sinusoidal PWM is the most widely accepted PWM technique, where a triangular wave is

compared with a sinusoidal reference known as the modulating signal, shown in Fig. 3.

4.1.2 Third Harmonic injection PWMA method to improve the gain of the pulse width modulator in a multilevel inverter is to

inject a third harmonic. This technique is derived from conventional sinusoidal PWM with the

addition of a 17% third harmonic component to the sine reference waveform as shown in Fig.4.

Fig. 4:Third Harmonic Injectionmodulating signal control technique

4.1.3 Modified Space Vector PWMIn the SPWM scheme for two-level inverters, each reference phase voltage is compared with

the triangular carrier and the individual pole voltages are generated, independent of each other [5, 6].

To obtain the maximum possible peak amplitude of the fundamental phase voltage, in linear


5/13




123

modulation, a common mode voltage, Voffset1, is added to the reference phase voltages [9, 1],

where the magnitude of Voffset1 is given by

2

)( minmax1

VVVoffset

+= Equation - (1)

In (1), Vmax is the maximum magnitude of the three sampled reference phase voltages, while

Vmin is the minimum magnitude of the three sampled reference phase voltages, in a sampling

interval. The addition of the common mode voltage, Voffset1, results in the active inverter switching

vectors being centered in a sampling interval, making the SPWM technique equivalent to the

modified reference PWM technique [9].The modulating signal of modified space vector is shown in

fig. 5.

Fig. 5:Modified Space vector modulating signal control technique

4.2 Multicarrier PWM Techniques

The implementation of the various carrier PWM techniques is possible for multi-level

inverters. This paper uses multi-level triangular waves generation as derived in [5]. It can be a useful

solution for pulse generation for this topology. This technique in [13] is called carrier redistribution

(CR) technique. This technique is derived from the triangular carrier and has individually the lowest

switching frequency among the multi-level PWM methods [14].

4.2.1Alterative Phase Opposition Disposition (APOD)This technique requires each of the (m 1) carrier waveforms, for an m-level phase

waveform, to be phase displaced from each other by 1800alternately as shown in Figures 6,7, and 8

for various modulating signals. The most significant harmonics are centered as sidebands around the

carrier frequency fc and therefore no harmonics occur at fc.

Fig.6: Sinusoidal reference withtriangular carriers for a 3-phase seven-level PWM scheme using

APOD


6/13




124

Fig.7:Third Harmonic Injection reference withtriangular carriers for a 3-phase seven-level

PWM scheme using APOD

Fig.8:Modified Space vector reference withtriangular carriers for a 3-phase seven-level PWM

scheme using APOD

4.2.2 Phase Opposition Disposition (POD)The carrier waveforms are all in phase above and below the zero reference value however,

there is 1800phase shift between the ones above and below zero respectively as shown in Figures 9,

10 and 11 for various modulating signals. The significant harmonics, once again, are located around

the carrier frequency fc for both the phase and line voltage waveforms.

Fig.9:Sinusoidal reference withtriangular carriers for a 3-phase seven-level PWM scheme using

POD


PWM scheme using POD


7/13




125

Fig.11:Modified Space vector reference withtriangular carriers for a 3-phase seven-level

PWM scheme using POD

4.2.3 Phase Disposition (PD)

In this technique all the carrier waveforms are in same phase. Fig.11, 12 and 13 demonstrates

the various modulating signals for a seven-level inverter.

Fig.12:Sinusoidal reference withtriangular carriers for a 3-phase seven-level PWM scheme

using PD


PWM scheme using PD

Fig.14: Modified Space vector reference withtriangular carriers for a 3-phase seven-level

PWM scheme using PD


8/13




126

V.SIMULATION RESULTS

A detailed circuit simulation was conducted to verify the operating principles of the three

phase seven level Diode clamped using SPWM, THPWM and Modified SVPWM strategies based on

Carrier Redistribution Techniques.

Seven Level Diode Clamped MLI for 3

5.1Sinusoidal PWM

Fig.15:Line voltage of 3seven level DC MLI using SPWM

Fig.16: FFT analysis of line voltage of 3seven level DC MLI using APOD

Fig.17: FFT analysis of line voltage of 3seven level DC MLI using POD

Fig.18: FFT analysis of line voltage of 3seven level DC MLI using PD


9/13




127

5.2 Third Harmonic injection PWM

Fig.19:Line voltage of 3seven level DC MLI using THPWM

Fig.20:FFT analysis of line voltage of 3seven level DC MLI using APOD

Fig.21:FFT analysis of line voltage of 3seven level DC MLI using POD

Fig.22:FFT analysis of line voltage of 3seven level DC MLI using PD


10/13




128

5.3 Modified Space Vector PWM

Fig.23:Line voltage of 3seven level DC MLI using Modified SVPWM

Fig.24:FFT analysis of line voltage of 3seven level DC MLI using APOD

Fig.25:FFT analysis of line voltage of 3seven level DC MLI using POD

Fig.26:FFT analysis of line voltage of 3seven level DC MLI using PD


11/13




129

The simulated AC output voltage of the seven level Diode Clamped inverter using SPWM,

THPWM and Modified SVPWM based on Carrier Redistribution Techniques for 3 and its

corresponding FFT analysis are shown in above figures. These waveforms confirm the principle of

operation of 7-level Diode Clamped inverter using SPWM, THPWM and modified SVPWM with

resistive load.

VI. COMPARISON OF RESULTS

Input Voltage = 400 Volts

Switching Frequency = 10 KHz

Modulation Index = 0.866

Table.3:% THD for various PWM Techniques for Seven Level Diode Clamped Inverter

PWM

TechniqueSPWM THPWM

Modified

SVPWM

APOD 18.8 16.75 13.18

POD 21.58 20.36 18.97

PD 13.1 11.24 10.72

Table.4:Fundamental Output Voltage (Vrms) for various PWM Techniques for Seven Level Diode

Clamped Inverter

PWM

TechniqueSPWM THPWM

Modified

SVPWM

APOD 293 296.7 335.8

POD 291.6 327.8 333.3

PD 294. 331.6 337.1

Fig. 27:% Graphical representation of % THD for various PWM Techniques for Seven Level Diode

Clamped Inverter

The Diode Clamped Three Phase Seven Level Inverter is simulated for various PWM

strategies based on carrier redistribution technique. The simulation results with harmonic spectrum

are presented and the corresponding results are shown in table 3 and table 4. In addition to this

graphical representation is also shown in fig. 26. In this presentation it is concluded that modified

SVPWM scheme with PD carrier redistribution technique has given good harmonic spectrum with

fundamental THD when compared with SPWM and THPWM techniques.


12/13




130

VII.CONCLUSION

The diode clamped 3-phase seven level inverter is simulated for sinusoidal PWM, Third

Harmonic PWM technique and modified space vector PWM technique with APOD, POD and PD

PWM strategies. The simulation results with harmonic spectrum are presented, and in this paper it is

concluded that modified reference SVPWM using PD technique has given good harmonic spectrumwith fundamental (335.8) and THD (10.78%) when compared with other techniques.

One application area in the low-power range ( 100 kW) for Diode clamped inverter is in

permanent-magnet (PM) motor drives employing a PM motor of very low inductance. The DCMLI

can utilize the fast-switching low-cost low voltage MOSFETs and the IGBTs in the single-phase

bridges to dramatically reduce current and torque ripples and to improve motor efficiency by

reducing the associated copper and iron losses resulting from the current ripple. These configurations

may also be applied in distributed power generation involving fuel cells and photovoltaic cells.

VIII. REFERENCES

[1] Gui- jia su, senior member, IEEE, Multilevel DC-Link Inverter, IEEE Trans. on

Indapplications, vol.41, issue 4, pp.724-738,may/june 2005.[2]. Zhong Du, Member,IEEE, Leon M.Tolbert, senior member Fundamental Frequency

Switching Strategies of a Seven level Hybride Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter ,

IEEE Transactions on, vol.24, no.1, Jan 2009

[3]. J. Rodr guez, J. Lai, and F. Peng, Multilevel inverters:Asurvey of topologies, controls and

applications, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 724738, Aug. 2002

[4]. W. Yao, H. Hu, and Z. Lu, Comparisons of space-vector modulation and carrier-based

modulation of multilevel inverter, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 4551,

Jan. 2008.

[5]. J. N. Chiasson, L. M. Tolbert, K. J.McKenzie, and Z.Du, A new approach to solving the

harmonic elimination equations for a multilevel converter,in Proc. IEEE Ind. Appl. Soc.

Annu. Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT, Oct. 1216, 2003, pp. 640645.

[6]. Z. Du, L. M. Tolbert, and J. N. Chiasson, Active harmonic elimination for multilevel

converters, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 459469, Mar. 2006.

[7]. V. Blasko, A novel method for selective harmonic elimination in power electronic

equipment, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 223228, Jan. 2007.

[8]. J. R. Wells, X. Geng, P. L. Chapman, P. T. Krein, and B. M. Nee, Modulation-based

harmonic elimination, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 336340, Jan. 2007.

[9]. S.Mariethoz , A.Rufer, Resolution and efficiency improvements for three-phase cascaded

multilevel inverters , IEEE transaction,2004.

[10]. K. Thorborg and A. Nystorm, Staircase PWM: an uncomplicated and efficient modulation

technique for ac motor drives, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. PE3, No.4,

1988, pp. 391-398.

[11]. J. C. Salmon, S. Olsen, and N. Durdle, A three-phase PWM strategy using a stepped 12reference waveform, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. IA27, No. 5, 1991,

pp.914-920.

[12]. M. H. Ohsato, G. Kimura, and M. Shioya, Five-stepped PWM inverter used in photo-

voltaic systems, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 38, October, 1991,

pp. 393-397.

[13]. J. Rodriguez, J.-S. Lai, and F. Z. Peng, Multi-level inverter: a survey of topologies,

controls, and applications, IEEE Trans.Ind. Electron, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 724738,

Aug. 2002


13/13




131

[14]. Gerardo Ceglia, Vctor Guzmn, Member ,IEEE, Carlos Snchez, Fernando Ibez, Julio

Walter, and Mara I. Gimnez, Member ,IEEE , A New Simplified Multilevel Inverter

Topology for DCAC Conversion, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 21,

no. 5, Sep.2006.

AUTHORS DETAIL

S.Nagaraja Rao was born in kadapa, India. He received the B.Tech (Electrical and

Electronics Engineering) degree from the Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University,

Hyderabad in 2006; M.Tech (Power Electronics) from the same university in 2008.

He is currently pursuing his Ph.D under JNTUK, Kakinada. He has published several

National and International Journals and Conferences. His area of interest power

electronics and Electric Drives.

Dr. D. V. Ashok Kumar, was born in Nandyal, India in 1975. He received the B.E

(Electrical and Electronics Engineering) degree from Gulbarga University and theM.Tech (Electrical Power Systems) from J.N.T.U.C.E, Anantapur and Ph.D in Solar

Energy from same University. Currently he is working as Pricipal in Syamaldevi

Institute of Technology for women, Nandyal, He has published/presented technical

research papers in national and international Journals/conferences. His field of interest

includes Electrical Machines, Power electronics, Power systems and Solar Energy.

Ch. Sai Babu received the B.E from Andhra University (Electrical & Electronics

Engineering), M.Tech in Electrical Machines and Industrial Drives from REC,

Warangal and Ph.D in Reliability Studies of HVDC Converters from JNTU,

Hyderabad. Currently he is working as a Professor in Dept. of EEE in JNTUK,

Kakinada. He has published several National and International Journals and

Conferences. His area of interest is Power Electronics and Drives, Power System

Reliability, HVDC Converter Reliability, Optimization of Electrical Systems and Real Time Energy

Management.

pwm control strategies for multilevel inverters based on carrier redistribution technique

Documents