learning a relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

38
Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience.

Upload: baldwin-owens

Post on 29-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Learning

A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results

from experience.

Page 2: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Not Learning: Instincts and Reflexes

• Some behavioral responses are instinctual or reflexive and do not reflect learning

• Fixed Action Pattern (instinct)– A behavior that is built into an animal’s nervous system

and is triggered by a specific stimulus, even the first time it is encountered

– All members of a particular species display the behavior (I.e., the behavior is species-specific)

• Reflex – An automatic response to external stimulation– Many behavioral reflexes in infants quickly disappear

Page 3: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Simple (Nonassociative) Learning: Habituation and sensitization

• Habituation– A primitive form of learning in which a stimulus

becomes familiar to an organism after repeated exposure and the organism stops responding

• Sensitization– Another primitive form of learning in which a noxious

stimulus, such as an electrical shock to the tail of the Aplysia, increases the response to a gentle touch of another part of the snail’s body

• Both of these forms of simple learning are caused by changes in the amount of neurotransmitter released by the sensory neuron that is stimulated

Page 4: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Classical conditioning: One form of associative learning

• Classical conditioning: A learning process in which a previously neutral stimulus becomes associated with another stimulus (and the response that stimulus elicits) through repeated pairing with that stimulus; associative learning

• Before Stimuli Are Paired– Unconditioned Stimulus (US) elicits Unconditioned

Response (UR)• Meat powder (US) leads to salivation (UR)

– Neutral stimulus (NS) elicits no particular response• Bell (NS) leads to orienting response only

Page 5: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Pavlov’s Apparatus

• Harness and fistula (mouth tube) help keep dog in a consistent position and gather uncontaminated saliva samples– They do not cause the dog discomfort

Page 6: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

During and After Conditioning

• Conditioning Trials: Neutral Stimulus is Paired with the Unconditioned Stimulus– Bell (NS) rings, then meat powder (US) is delivered– Each time this happens is called a conditioning “trial”– Repeated several times

• After Several Trials– When bell rings, dog salivates– The bell is now a Conditioned Stimulus (CS)– Salivation is now a Conditioned Response (CR)

Page 7: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Acquisition, Extinction, and Spontaneous recovery

Page 8: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Important classical conditioning principles• When should the CS be presented?

– Forward pairing, in which the CS precedes the US, is the most effective type of conditioning

• Higher (or second) order conditioning – If an additional neutral stimulus is paired with the CS, it too can be

conditioned and become a CS

• Stimulus generalization– The tendency to respond in a conditioned manner to a stimulus that

is similar to the CS

• Stimulus discrimination– The complement of generalization

– The ability to not respond to stimuli similar to the CS that have been distinguished from the CS (perhaps through extinction)

Page 9: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Conditioned Emotional Responses

• A learned association between a neutral stimulus and a stimulus that evokes an emotional response

• John Watson conditioned an 11-month old boy – named “Albert” – to fear a white laboratory rat– Each time he reached for the rat, Watson made a loud

clanging noise right behind Albert

• Albert’s fear generalized to anything white and furry– Including rabbits and Santa Claus

• Phobia: A fearful, anxious, irrational reaction to an object or event that often leads to avoidance– Can be treated using classical conditioning principles

Page 10: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Conditioned Taste Aversion• If a flavor is followed by an illness experience, the

organism will not consume the flavor in the future• John Garcia conditioned wolves to avoid the taste of

sheep– Wolves were fed mutton that was laced with a chemical

(lithium chloride) that caused nausea– Later, when a wolf attacked a sheep, it stopped its attack

as soon as it experienced the taste of mutton

• Before conditioning, the mutton is the neutral stimulus and lithium chloride is the US, because the UR (nausea) is a reflexive response to lithium chloride, not mutton

Page 11: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Conditioned Immune Responses• In rats, sugar water was paired with a drug that weakened

the immune system and later, the sugar water alone weakened the immune system

• In humans, chemotherapy weakens the immune system and, after being paired with the hospital in which the chemotherapy takes place, just entering the hospital weakened the immune system

• In rats, when sugar water was paired with a bacterial agent that increased immune system response, later the sugar water alone increased immune system response

• In humans, when sherbet ice cream (or another neutral stimulus) is paired with a shot of adrenalin (which increases the immune response), later the sherbet ice cream alone will increase the immune response.

Page 12: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Biological Preparedness• All animals are biologically programmed to learn some

associations more easily than others.• John Garcia paired light, sound, and taste stimuli

presented simultaneously to rats with– A dose of X-rays that caused nausea hours later– A painful shock applied to the foot

Page 13: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Contiguity vs. Predictability• Classical Conditioning

may be learning that one event predicts another

• Top graph: The US does not happen without the CS– Good learning here– Organism is not anxious

when tone is not sounded

• Bottom graph: The US happens with or without CS– Poor learning here– Organism is in a constant

state of anxiety

Page 14: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Rescorla-Wagner Model• When the occurrence of the US is a surprise, there is greater

classical conditioning to the CS.– This is because the organism will seek out a stimulus (a NS) that

predicts the occurrence of the US and associate that stimulus (now a CS) with the US

• Novel stimuli are more easily associated with a US than are familiar stimuli– In second-order conditioning, blocking sometimes occurs

• Blocking is the failure of a stimulus to become conditioned because there is already a (familiar) stimulus acting as the CS

– Latent inhibition• An often-presented (familiar) neutral stimulus is unlikely to be associated

with a US after just a single trial because of the history of the organism’s experience

Page 15: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

The Law of Effect

• E. L. Thorndike put hungry cats into “puzzle boxes” in which a lever would open the door to food that was visible outside of the box

• Time to escape decreased from 3 minutes to 1 minute over 25 attempts

• Behaviors that worked to escape were repeated while other behaviors (scratching bars, sniffing corners) decreased

• The Law of Effect: Behavior is controlled by it’s consequences

Page 16: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Operant Conditioning: A second form of associative learning

Introduce Remove

Pleasurable Stimulus

Positive Reinforcement:Increases behavior

Negative Punishment: Decreases behavior

Aversive Stimulus

Positive Punishment: Decreases behavior

Negative Reinforcement: Increases behavior

• Operant conditioning: Behaviors (operants) operate on the environment and will either increase or decrease depending on the consequences they elicit

Page 17: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Examples• Positive reinforcement

– Introduction of a reward (money, hug, smile, etc.)

• Negative reinforcement– Removal of an aversive stimulus

• Taking aspirin removes the headache, which increases the likelihood of taking aspirin in the future

• Positive punishment– Introduction of an aversive stimulus

• Spanking, scolding; in experiments: shock

• Negative punishment– Removal of a positive stimulus

• Taking away the keys to the car• Timeouts

Page 18: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Perils of Punishment• Learner may not understand which operant is being

punished• Learner may come to fear the teacher (a conditioned

emotional response), rather than learn the association between action and punishment, and then avoids the teacher

• Punishment may not undo existing rewards for a behavior– As a result, the behavior may be hidden, but not extinguished– Punished behavior needs to be replaced

• The punishment might be levied when the teacher is angry – As a result, the punishment might not be appropriate

• Punitive punishment leads to future aggression (modeling)• Neglected children may enjoy the attention, even when it’s

negative

Page 19: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Partial Reinforcement Effect

• Partial Reinforcement Effect– The tendency for a schedule of partial reinforcement to

strengthen later resistance to extinction.– After partial reinforcement, the subject is already familiar

with the fact that every operant is not followed by a reinforcer

Page 20: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Schedules of Reinforcement

• Simple reinforcement schedules produce characteristic response patterns

• Steeper lines mean higher response rates

• Ratio schedules produce higher response rates than interval schedules

Page 21: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Other important operant conditioning principles

• Shaping is a procedure that produces novel behaviors by reinforcing closer and closer approximations to the desired behavior

• Discriminative stimuli signal the fact that the consequences of our behavior often vary from one situation to the next– One of the keys to the flexibility and complexity of behavior

• People give and receive reinforcement and punishment in nearly all of their interactions– Parent punishes child by sending him to his room. Child negatively

reinforces the parental act of punishment if he no longer acts out.

• Primary vs. secondary reinforcers– Primary: satisfy biological needs– Secondary: are associated with primary reinforcers

• e.g., money, grades, etc.

Page 22: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Practical Applications of Operant Conditioning

• Clinical– Biofeedback– Cognitive-behavioral therapy

• Workplace

• School– Computer-assisted instruction– Token systems

• But must take care when rewarding an intrinsically enjoyable task

Page 23: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Biofeedback & Tension Headaches

• Sensors on the head detect muscle activity and the system converts signal to visual display

• Patient watches the display, tries to reduce tension, and thereby tries to reduce activity on the display – If the display shows reduced activity

(because the patient has reduced tension in their mind/body), this acts like a reinforcer

• Like getting a good grade after studying hard

– If the display shows increased activity (because the patient is experiencing increased tension in their mind/body), this is acts like a punishment

• Like getting a poor grade after not studying

– Over time, patients will learn how to reduce tension in the mind/body

• In this way, the use of biofeedback is a very successful practical application of operant conditioning principles

Page 24: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

The difference between classical and operant conditioning

• In classical conditioning, the organism’s behavior is reflexive and it learns a relationship between two stimuli that precede it.

• In operant conditioning, the organism learns a relationship between a voluntary behavior and the consequence of that behavior, which of course occurs after the behavior.

Page 25: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

The traditional view of conditioning . . .

• Organisms learn specific responses to specific stimuli.

• If there is anything internal to the organism that has an effect on behavior, these effects can be more simply explained by appealing to the principles by which stimuli are associated with each other or with responses.

• S-R psychology

Page 26: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Is supplemented by a cognitive perspective on conditioning

• But researchers discovered several situations in which the traditional view was an insufficient explanation of behavior

• These observations indicated that psychologists needed to consider stuff (motivation, cognition, beliefs, expectations) that is internal to the organism– Motivational perspective on learning– Cognitive perspective on learning

• Latent learning of cognitive maps, locus of control, and learned helplessness

– Observational learning

Page 27: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

A Motivational Perspective on Learning

• Drives are internal stimulation that create an unpleasant state of tension. In turn, this tension impels the organism into activity in order to reduce the tension. Drive strength determines the vigor and persistence of that activity.– Hunger, Thirst, Sex, Aggression

• Drive reduction theory: A reinforcer is reinforcing because it reduces drives.– If a rat is hungry (primary drive) and it receives food (primary

reinforcer) as a result of a certain action, then hunger is reduced and the behavior increases.

– If a person needs money (a secondary drive) and they receive money (secondary reinforcer) as a result of a certain action, then the need for money is reduced and the behavior increases.

Page 28: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Motivational Perspective on Learning cont.

• Escape learning – Organisms can learn to make a response that terminates

an aversive stimulus (negative reinforcement)

• Avoidance learning– Organisms can learn to make a response in order to

prevent an aversive stimulus from even starting to make the organism feel discomfort.

• Where’s the negative reinforcement in avoidance learning?– Avoidance is escape from fear.

• An internal state is an important factor in learning.

Page 29: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Latent Learning and Cognitive Maps• Rats: one maze trial/day

• One group found food every time (red line)

• Second group never found food (blue line)

• Third group found food on Day 11 (green line)– Sudden change, day 12

• The essence of conditioning is not the modification of behavior, it’s the modification of knowledge.

Page 30: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Locus of control

• Behavior is not so much influenced by the actual relationship between behavior and it’s consequences as it is by the subjective belief about that relationship, called an expectancy.

• Generalized expectancies are a dimension of one’s personality.– Internal locus of control: I am the master of my own

destiny.• If I study harder I can influence my grades.

– External locus of control: My fate is determined by forces outside of my control.

• My grade will be arbitrarily determined by the questions that are selected on the exam.

Page 31: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Learned helplessness• Dogs are placed in a harness and then shocked.• Half the dogs can escape from the shock; half cannot.• After several trials, the dogs that can escape the shock learn

to do so very rapidly (escape learning), while those that cannot do not even attempt to escape.

• Then the dogs from both groups are placed in a “shuttle box” where they can escape a shock by jumping over a barrier.

• The dogs that had been in the inescapable harness do not attempt to escape. – They have learned to be helpless, even in their new situation.– They have an expectancy that nothing they do can help them

escape the shock.– This is an animal model for depression in humans.

Page 32: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Observational Learning I

• Observational Learning– Learning that occurs when one observes the behavior of

others• Albert Bandura conducted important experiments showing that

nursery school students would behave more aggressively when they observed an aggressive adult.

• Monkeys raised in a laboratory that were unafraid of snakes observed the fear response of wild monkeys towards snakes and then became fearful of snakes themselves (Mineka et al., 1984).

– Vicarious conditioning• Learning the consequences of a behavior by observing the

consequences of somebody else’s behavior• Even though an organism may not behave in a manner that it

has seen punished, this does not mean that the organism has not learned (acquired) the behavior

Page 33: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Observational Learning II

• Modeling– A common term used to describe one organism’s imitation of the

behavior of another organism (i.e., the model)– Such imitation is often unconscious.– Mirror neurons

• When an organism performs an action, these special neurons become activated, even though they are not themselves responsible for the performance of the action.

• When a second organism watches the first organism perform the action, the analogous set of mirror neurons in the second organism becomes activated, even though the second organism does not actually perform the action.

• Mirror neurons may be responsible for storing an action plan – When the organism performs the action, mirror neurons may direct other

neurons that are directly responsible for the action» The action plan stored in mirror neurons may also used to provide

feedback to the neurons that are directly responsible for the action about possible discrepancies between the action plan and the performed action

Page 34: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Biological Mechanisms of Reward

• Nucleus accumbens– Subcortical brain structure that is part of the limbic

system– The pleasure center

• When stimulated, the organism feels pleasure

– Responsible for the pleasure that you feel when you eat, drink, engage in sexual behaviors, use recreational drugs, and even when you receive a secondary reinforcer (such as money)

• Dopamine is the principal neurotransmitter in the nucleus accumbens– Drugs that block the effects of dopamine disrupt operant

conditioning

Page 35: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

The neuronal basis of learning• Donald Hebb: Learning results from alterations in synaptic

connections– Cells that fire together, wire together.

• When the firing of one neuron excites another neuron, the synapse becomes strengthened such that there is an increase in the likelihood that when the first neuron fires again, so will the second neuron.

– Also known as long-term potentiation (LTP)• Artificial stimulation of a first neuron increases the likelihood that further

stimulation of that neuron will activate a second neuron• Caused by increased sensitivity of the post-synaptic neuron to the

stimulation– Compare with habituation and sensitization, where the amount of

neurotransmitter released into the synapse changes.

– NMDA receptors• Special receptors that open only if two neurons fire at the same time

– Like Hebb argued• Required for LTP• Genetically altering these receptors in mice led to super smart “Doogie

mice”

Page 36: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Computerized Neural Networks

• Computer models of learning in which individual pieces of information can be graphically represented by nodes (see Figure 6.24)

• These models can behave like human beings

• They emphasize strengthening connections between nodes that are used when a particular stimulus is input and weakening connections that are not used– Like Hebb argued

Page 37: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Pandemonium Model

Page 38: Learning A relatively permanent change in knowledge or behavior that results from experience

Interactive Activation Model