inception report_27 juni

7/27/2019 Inception Report_27 Juni

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/inception-report27-juni 1/17

THE DEVELOPMENT OF AGROPOLITAN AREA THROUGH MARKET SYSTEM

OPTIMALIZATION BY TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE UTILIZATION

2011

INCEPTION REPORT



Project Team :

Iwan Aminto Ardi (10/306787/PMU/06671)

Bima Setya Nugraha (10/309087/PMU/06798)

Mia Zuhara Primasari (10/309369/PMU/06803)

Gusnita Noor Aini (10/310286/PMU/06878)

MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA

1





2011

INCEPTION REPORT



1. Background

Desa Karangtengah is a tourist village owned by the districts of Bantul, located in

Karangtengah, Imogiri, Bantul, Yogyakarta. Desa Karangtengah is located in hilly areas is

approximately 15 kilometers south east of Yogyakarta, and only about 2 miles from the

cemetery of the kings of Java (built by Sultan Agung Hanyokrokusumo 1645). The village

is also known as a tourist village, one you'll enjoy the comfortable village atmosphere of

naturalness in this Desa Karangtengah. The interesting thing other than a comfortable

village atmosphere is lodging with the traditional feel of wood but still awake and

cleanliness.

The village in recent years developed into the region agropolitan with reforestation

program that aims to transform degraded land into forests that cultivated silkworm

cultivation in cashew nut trees, avocado, soursop, mahogany, keben and dadap.

Agropolitan land is part of the Sultanate Ground, and later expected to be the location of

silkworm colonies. Villagers Karangtengah majority are poor. Some of them are local

transmigrants came from the small traders in the tourist area Parangtritis. Others are

victims of Yogyakarta earthquake in 2006.

In addition to this potential, many other potential of the region that have not been explored

to the maximum. For example in the presence of cooperative activities that do not Catur

Makaryo only deal with the problem of silkworms, but also other crafts. For example

batik, wood lathes, sewing, herbs, and so forth. Some business units were also able to

absorb a lot of human resources from the center of the village reef.

2. Problem Identifications And Analysis

The location of a site showing the strategic value of the place, its position as an entity

separate room and constelations with elsewhere shows how much value location

accessibility. Therefore, assessing a region should certainly be seen lying on a larger area,

2





2011

both at the macro, meso, and micro levels, given the spatial position of a place on this

earth is unique, has certain coordinates which of course there will be not duplicated. Desa

Karangtengah, is one of the villages located in the Sub-district Imogiri as part of the

District of Bantul, Yogyakarta Province. Here will be described a strategic position in the

constellation Desa Karangtengah, Regional Province of Yogyakarta, Bantul, and the Sub

District of Imogiri, both administratively and functionally.

Geographically position Desa Karangtengah located at the southeast of the downtown Sub

District Imogiri. The Location of Desa Karangtengah strategic enough, a meeting of

liaison channels between the City of Bantul, the Capital Sub District Imogiri, and

Gunungkidul. The strategic location makes the region has the potential for physical growth

is quite high, although the current agricultural activities still appear to dominate most areas

of the Desa Karangtengah.

Figure 1. Orientation Map of Desa Karangtengah

3

Desa Karangtengah





2011

Access to the Desa Karangtengah very easily, supported by a good road network and can

be reached from all directions. To reach the Sub District Imogiri there are several

alternative public transport routes, namely:

• Descending or urban transportation in the province that connects with other modes of

medium connecting bus: Terminal Giwangan - Jl. Scouts - Jl. Umbulharjo -

Karangtunggal - Karangkajen - Ring-road - Jetis - Imogiri - Siluk - Bake, PP

• Rural transport mini-bus (Line 10: Siluk - Imogiri - Kembangsongo - Wonokromo -

Terminal Giwangan, PP) and (Line 11: Goa Cerme - Siluk - Imogiri - Singosaren -

Pucung - Segoroyoso - Market Pleret, PP)

• Non rural bus transportation department Dlingo Market - Imogiri - Barongan - Jetis -

Manding - Hospital - Simpanglima - gose - Market Bantul, PP.

However, based on field observations, to get to the Desa Karangtengah not served by

public transport, so that the dependence on private vehicles maih very high. As the liaison

between the Bantul and Gunungkidul course these conditions are less favorable, especially

this time Karangtengah Village was launched as a tourist destination, and Agro Tourism

Village in need of good transportation facilities in addition to transport infrastructure that

has been available.

Existing land uses in the Desa Karangtengah shows that the dominance of agricultural

activities are still clearly visible, with an area of 115.7 ha rice field (40.2%) of the total

area of 287.77 ha, at first glance can be compared with other villages in the District

Imogiri. While based on field observations, the utilization of space in the Desa

Karangtengah showed varying activities, namely: houses, shops, stalls, workshops,

industry, and others. Status of land in the study area is largely Sultanat Ground, which is

land owned by the Sultan of Yogyakarta, which is partly used for captive breeding of wild

silk worms and cashew nut plantations are managed by Royal Silk Foundation area of 60

ha (20.9%). Initially this area is a barren region, and has now become a green area with a

tight enough vegetation, particularly trees cashew, apukat, and mahogany. The species is a

venerated for supporting life of wild silkworms gold, and its cocoon is harvested to be

processed as a spun yarn and craft materials as a sideline Desa Karangtengah community.

4





2011

Table 1. Number of Land Use in the District Imogiri in 2007 (Ha)

Village

SoilBuilding

AreaForest

Other

UsesAmountPaddy

Field

Farm

Land

Selopamioro 335,06 1200,45 369,89 1,24 368,06 2274,7

Sriharjo 164,69 171,23 183,57 5,25 107,21 631,95

Kebonagung 106,17 0,74 58,6 - 21,6 187,11

Karangtengah 115,7 34,62 75,84 - 61,61 287,77

Girirejo 31,38 120,86 106,98 13,5 50,83 323,55

Karangtalun 63,97 - 37,19 - 20,04 121,2

Imogiri 37,94 - 36,39 - 9,23 83,56

Wukirsari 279,74 615,25 521,93 - 121,63 1538,55

Total Amount 1134,65 2143,15 1390,39 19,99 760,21 5448,39Prosentase (%) 20,83 39,34 25,52 0,37 13,95 100

Source: Kecamatan Imogiri Dalam Angka, Tahun 2007 berdasar Evaluasi Penggunaan Tanah Tahun 1994.

Settlement patterns in the village belong Karangtengah distributed in clusters of housing to

adapt to natural conditions, particularly conditions of landscape and topography. Have not

seen the tendency of "leap frog development" although in some places has seen a growth

in single buildings in the surrounding paddy field, but still at the village main road. In

general, the grouping of settlements in Desa Karangtengah can be divided into two major

parts, namely the settlements in the highlands and the lowlands residential area. Building

density in the lowlands look higher, while in the hilly residential dispersion in an organic

pattern. Building density is supported by the population density of inhabitants, the man-

land ratio shows the level density in a region.

Table 2. Gross Population Density in Sub Imogiri Year 2003-2007 (jiwa/Ha)

N u m b e r

Village Area (Ha) Built up Area

(Ha)

Population Density (person/ha)

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

1 Selopamioro 2275 369,89 5,83 5,87 5,92 5,95 6,03

2 Sriharjo 631,95 183,57 15,04 15,11 15,23 15,15 15,43

3 Kebonagung 187,111 58,6 17,29 17,28 17,36 17,56 17,85

4 Karangtengah 287,77 75,84 16,98 17,01 17,22 17,35 17,52

5 Girirejo 323,55 106,98 13,90 13,90 14,07 14,14 14,20

6 Karangtalun 121,2 37,19 33,72 23,32 23,40 23,15 23,93

7 Imogiri 83,56 36,39 45,00 45,32 45,70 45,32 45,70

8 Wukirsari 1538,55 521,93 9,49 9,49 9,62 9,71 9,95

5





2011

Imogiri Sub District (gross) 5448,69 10,38 10,43 10,52 10,55 10,733

Imogiri Sub District Netto 1390,39 40,68 40,89 41,21 41,36 42,062

Source: Kecamatan Imogiri Dalam Angka 2003-2007, diolah

Desa Karangtengah lays on fourth number of rank in population density when compared

with other villages in the Sub District Imogiri, with a fairly high population growth

(0.8%) would bring impacts accelerating the increase of population density in the future,

especially if the projected 20 - 30 years to come.

Policy Direction of DIY shows that the Sub District Imogiri strategic areas in the context

of DIY is an integrated economic development area of the province for the Bantul

District, together with Sewon, Kasihan, Banguntapan, Sedayu, Srandakan and Piyungan.

Imogiri in the same context, based on the existing potential cultural heritage area is the

province, namely the existence of the Tomb of the Kings of Mataram.

Based on the data and information obtained either directly or indirectly identified several

main issues, namely:

1. Unintegrated Market System: commodity marketing and potential (tourism, agro)

region which was "individual"

2. Unsupported Infrastructure: the existing infrastructure does not yet support the

activities of "agro tourism, trade" so that "regional marketing" is not going well

(supply chain)

3. Unsupported Institution: institutional setting has not been supportive of "agro tourism,

trade", which is not yet clear institutional arrangements, community business plan

unexplored

4. Linkage Among Unintegrated Market System, Infrastructure, Institution, Community

Business Plan

3. Goal, Objectives, And Output

6





2011

Based on the potential and problems in the field, this event aims to: Optimalization of

Agropolitan Market System by Improving Transportation Infrastructure for Agropolitan

Area Development.

To achieve that goal gradually, then set some targets of activities, namely:

1. Integrate the agropolitant market systems (local, regional, global).

2. Revitalization of Local Institution to support the agropolitant market system

3. Reducing travel time of agropolitant commodity transportation

4. Reducing cost of agropolitant commodity transportation

5. Providing Supply Chain System (logistic) for Agropolitant Commodity

6. Determining feasible locations for agropolitant market development (local, regional,

global)

7. Determining fesible locations for transportation & logistic infrastructure (gudang,

inland/dry port, dll)

Both goals and objectives need to be developed to achieve the vision of regional

marketing, as seen on spatial network concept below :

7





2011

4. Methods And Techniques To Be Used

4.1. Methods used

Several methods will be used in this project.a. Analysis of land use growth (Block B)

Principle of good land use system will be used to analyses the condition of current

system in study location. This principle also to be used in the design process.

b. Analysis of spatial planning (Block B)

In the context of spatial development, this approach will be used to provide better

spatial planning, including the use of GIS and RS (if possible).

c. Analysis the economy aspect (Block C1).

We will try to use the economy approach to analyse this area such as the use of

CBA (not full scale) to see whether this project feasible or not.

d. Analysis the infrastructure impact on community development (Block C2).

The approach to see whether the infrastructure can be a benefit for community will

be used such as to see the possibility of this project to serve, create interaction or

even create transformation for people. The methods of social analysis also be used

in this project

e. Analysis of traffic generation and its impact (Block D).

The methods of transport planning will be used to identify the transport demand

from this location. The four step model (not in full scale) will be used.

f. Analysis of possible financing scheme and its governance (Block E).

This methods will be provide possibility using several financing scheme like using

public spending or public private partnership. The use of good governance

principle also be used in possible to provide the institutional system of the

implementation of this project.

g. Analysis of appropriate infrastructure design (Block F1)

In our proposal we will try to propose infrastructure to support our plan with

certain function that specified to achieved our objectives. Whole System Design

approach will be used to provide requirement of many infrastructure system in this

area.

h. Analysis of infrastructure design (Block F2)

8





2011

Several infrastructure system that already learned from Block F2 will be used to

provide the infrastructure system, including:

• Roads: type, hierarchy, geometry

• Logistic transport system: demand, network system, operation system

• Supporting Infrastructure: Warehouse, Dry Port, etc

i. Policy process attributes

• Consultation checklist

• Model for Explaining The Purpose of Policy Paper

• Evidence

9





2011

Tabel 3. Consultation Checklist

10





2011

11

Who Stakeholders: Government, community, Gusti Pambayun, NGO, academic person.

What Agropolitan Area Development Through Marketing Optimization System With Transportation

Logistics Infrastructure Utilization

When 2011

Where Karang Tengah Village

Sub District of Imogiri

District Bantul

Province DI Yogyakarta

Why Unintegrated Market System : pemasaran komoditas dan potensi (wisata, agro) wilayah yang

masih “individual”

Unsupported Infrastructure : infrastruktur yang ada belum mendukung kegiatan “agro, tourism,

trade” sehingga “regional marketing” tidak berjalan dengan baik (supply chain)

Unsupported Institution : kelembagaan yang ada belum mendukung kegiatan “agro, tourism,

trade”, institutional arrangement yang belum jelas, community business plan belum tereksplorasi

Unintegrated Linkage among Market System, Infrastructure, Institution, Community Business

Plan

How Best Methods : stakeholder analysis, spatial analysis, benefit cost analysis, NETS,a. Analysis of land use growth (Block B)

Principle of good land use system will be used to analyses the condition of current

system in study location. This principle also to be used in the design process.

b. Analysis of spatial planning (Block B)

In the context of spatial development, this approach will be used to provide better

spatial planning, including the use of GIS and RS (if possible).

c. Analysis the economy aspect (Block C1).

We will try to use the economy approach to analyse this area such as the use of CBA

(not full scale) to see whether this project feasible or not.

d. Analysis the infrastructure impact on community development (Block C2).

The approach to see whether the infrastructure can be a benefit for community will

be used such as to see the possibility of this project to serve, create interaction or

even create transformation for people. The methods of social analysis also be used in

this project

e. Analysis of traffic generation and its impact (Block D).

The methods of transport planning will be used to identify the transport demand

from this location. The four step model (not in full scale) will be used.

f. Analysis of possible financing scheme and its governance (Block E).

This methods will be provide possibility using several financing scheme like using

public spending or public private partnership. The use of good governance principle

also be used in possible to provide the institutional system of the implementation of

this project.

g. Analysis of appropriate infrastructure design (Block F1)

In our proposal we will try to propose infrastructure to support our plan with certain

function that specified to achieved our objectives. Whole System Design approach

will be used to provide requirement of many infrastructure system in this area.

h. Analysis of infrastructure design (Block F2)

Several infrastructure system that already learned from Block F2 will be used to

provide the infrastructure system, including:

• Roads: type, hierarchy, geometry

• Logistic transport system: demand, network system, operation system





2011

Tabel 4. Model for Explaining The Purpose of Policy Paper

Problem 1. Low added value and benefit of agropolitant product

(found the root of the problem....i.e. : tradition)

Reason for Bringing Problem Forward 1. The local government policy of agropolitantdevelopment

2. It is need to identify wheter Desa Karangtengahsuitable for Agropolitant Area or not

3. Its need to identify what infrastructure are providedthere at this time that supported the distribution of

agropolitant product4. It is need to identify what factor which influence

the low added value and benefit of agropolitant

commodity

5. It is important to know more about how thecommunity increasing their adaptive capacity due to

agropolitant development

Symptoms 1. High number of poor people (68%)

2. Less access to others part (transportation, marketinftrastructure)

3. less distribution of agropolitant commodity4. less demand of agropolitant production

5. low productivity of agropolitant commodity

6. low understanding of people about agropolitant policy

12





2011

7. low inforrmation and access of the people about

how to sell their agropolitant product

Elaboration of Symptoms 1. High number of poor people (68%)

Desa Karangtengah inhabitants were dominate by

poor people with low income, especially for

agriculture workers, construction workers, andhandycraft industrial workers)

2. Less access to others part (transportation,

market infrastructure)

Threre is no dry port, warehouse, agro market, and

certain road and facilities as supporting elements of agropolitant area. It has causes many problems of

distribution and logistic chain3. less distribution of agropolitant commodity

agropolitant product only distributed to others areasurrounded, there is no facilities and system to

distribute the agropolitants product properly,especially to protect the commodity from damage.

4. less demand of agropolitant productiondemand of agropolitant product is low, it will

influenced to people income especially low income people

5. low productivity of agropolitant commodity

the productivity of agropolitant commodity indicate

in low condition, and has no special priority to bedeveloped as agropolitant product

6. low understanding of people about agropolitant

policy

less of the people at Desa Karangtengah have

sufficient information about the policy of

agropolitant development at their site, so may they

have less encourage and awareness to be an actor of agropolitant development

7. low inforrmation and access of the people about

how to sell their agropolitant product

The people at Karangtengah need to be involved

more to improve their access to sell their productsand how to develop their own business plan and

increase their added value of agropolitant product

Context Historically Desa Karangtengah used to be has some

critical area, and been developed as a land of cashew nuttree cultivication at on 2004 by Royal Silk Foundation

At the beginings, the cultivation of cashew nut tree just

to make the soil became fertilizedDesired Change (outcome) To increase the added value of agropolitant commodity

product and increase the benefit of it for localcommunity

Insanity : doing the same thing, the same way, all the time, but expecting different result (anonymous)

It is tradition : it was a part of my tarining, and seems like what i should be doing. I feel somehow

guilty when i am not doing/following (creed, 1986, p.25)

13





2011

Initiate change : suddenly, i saw things differently, and because i saw differently, i thought differently,

i felt differently, and behaved differently (covey, 1989, p.31)

Smart work not just a hard work

Tabel 5. Evidence

An Evidence Checklist

What Evidence is Missing? Why Should This Evidence Be Added?

• Data on the amount of decline in financial

investment in municipal infrastructure:

- Unintegrated Market System

- Unsupported Infrastructure

-

Unsupported Institution- Unintegrated Linkage among Market

System, Infrastructure, Institution,

Community Business Plan

Because intregated of market, infrastucture,

institution and linkage system can create a great

productivity for community of Karang Tengah

Village.

• What explains the decline in investment over the

past 20 years?20 years ago, the condition that was happened at

Karang Tengah Village had not many industrysectors because communities is lack of

knowledges.

The key problem at Karang Tengah village is

disintegrated system of linkage: market,

transportation and institution.

• Might there be other key reasons for the

worsening condition of municipal infrastructure?Disintegrated transportation infrastructure à

disintegrated market system à disintegratedinstitution à disintegrated linkage of all system.

Not only financial investment, but the most

important thing is disintegrated system

• Data on the actual condition of each category of

municipal infrastructure:

- Transportation infrastructure: there is no

representative market system.

- Market system: there is no good system of market.

- Institution system: there is no unintegratedinstitution to provide the market system.

- Linkage system: there is no integratedmarket, transportation and institution

system.

The most urgent system to be replaced first:

Institution.

• Is there any evidence that we consider essential

but that isss not availableee to us?The institution, is not available yet

Regulation: Permendagri_no.39 tahun 2010 about

Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes)

14





2011

4.2. Techniques will be applied

a. Spatial analysis using GIS (Block B)

The techniques of spatial analysis will be used such as GIS techniques to analysis

the information and provide recommendation for better system.

b. Spatial statistics analysis(Block B)

This technique provides analysis for spatial statistics data, such as type of

relationship between area.

c. Surveys (Block B)

This technique to be used when gather information from field, like what type of

data, how to use them

d. Social analysis (social survey, social statistics, social impact) (Block C)e. Environment impact of settlement development (Block D)

f. The technique of EIA will be used learned from Block D providing insight analysis

of environment impact.

g. Stakeholder analysis (Block E)

It is important to do stakeholder analysis, and technique from Block E will be used

to analyst the interest, the power and the influence of the stakeholder in the project

location.

h. Modeling and scenario development (Block F)

Some development scenario will be produce and will be analyst using techniques

that learn from block E and F. Some modeling for infrastructure design also will be

used for this project.

i. Proposal writing and communication techniques (while doing surveys) (Block H)

Principle of good proposal writing will be used in this project, and also techniques

in communication when doing surveys or consultation with people in the project

location.

5. Group Organization

Iwan Aminto Ardi will be as coordinator of this project. Coordinator will ensure the

project can be conducted as scheduled, including lead the presentation of project team. As

spatial and physical analyst he will also provide observation result, preparing methods and

techniques, analyst the data and provide plan for spatial recommendation for the project.

15



30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 Lecturing

2 Composing Inception

3 Group Work on Objective Formulation

4 Inception Report Submission

5 Inception Presentation

6 Field Observation

7 Identification of exiting policy

8 Stakeholder Analysis

9 Policy Impact Assesment10 Policy development

11 Planing Phase

12 Design Phase

13 Formulation Draft Final Report

14 Submition Final Report

15 Individual Assesment

16 Presentation of Final Report

CONTENTSNO JULI JUNIMEI

DATE / MONTH



2011

Bima Setya Nugraha will take the role as economic policy aspect. His job is make

observation about economic policy impact in the project area as well as the

implementation of agropolitan area development through marketing optimization system

with transportation logistics infrastructure utilization.

Gusnita Noor Aini will take the role as environment expert, provide analysis of the

environment condition of the project area, doing analysis of environment policy, provide

input for infrastructure design and reporting the environment aspect of the project.

Mia Zuhara Primasari will take the role as social and community expert, provide analysis

of project area mainly on social and community development. The role of actors and their

interest in the project will be part of her task as well as providing policy analysis and

recommendation. As important part of the study, social and community development

concern in the infrastructure design will be provided by her.

6. Schedule

The schedule of this project presented at Table.

Tabel 6. The Schedule

16





2011

17

inception report_27 juni

Documents