bill stankiewicz jeremyclarke
DESCRIPTION
Best Regards, Bill Stankiewicz Vice President and General Manager Shippers Warehouse of Georgia Office: 678-364-3475 [email protected] http://www.linkedin.com/in/billstankiewicz2006http://www.slideshare.net/BillStankiewicz.http://www.twitter.com/BillStankiewicz Sustainable Consumer Packaged Goods member CPG Branding and Forum MemberPlease consider the environment before printing this e-mail“Change doesn\'t start on the surface. It\'s generated from consciousness.”Deepak Choprahttp://bill-stankiewicz.blogspot.com/2009/07/shippers-warehouse-in-top-70-food.htmlhttp://ask.depaul.edu/Students/MentoringandAdvice/ASK_Away_Archive.aspTRANSCRIPT
LLC Law
Hi Tech & Electronics Supply Chain European Summit
September 2007
Creating innovative customer centric 3PL & 4PL
service contracts &
collaborative frameworks whilst raising profit: realising
the elusive "Win-Win"…
Focus:
• 3PL & 4 PL
• Innovation
• Customer satisfaction
• Increasing Profit
• Win-Win
• Creative frameworks
Comm Corp Comm Corp Corp Comm
• 3PL & 4PL
Supply Agmts
Outsourcing
TSA
WSA
T&WSA
T&W+VASA
IT Agmts
LogisticsLogisticsLogisticsMHEMHEMHE £££ PrivatePrivatePrivate
EquityEquityEquity
Our Work…
LLCLLCLLC
• MHE
Procurement
Outsourcing
Agency, distribution, franchise
IT Agmts
• M&A Deals
Joint Ventures
Partnerships
Share/Business SalesInvestment AgmtsShare Option Agmts
Checklists
LLC’s Contribution…
• leveraging negotiating position
• Improve ROI
• Reduce risk
• Grooming for growth/investment/exit
• Understand, apply & deliver…
Frameworks…
• Contracts
• Adversarial
• Risk averse
• Point scoring
• Profit focussed
• “I-Win” c.f. “Win-Win”
Market Backdrop
• Services transactional
• Margins eroded
• Outsourcing growth
• Complexity…
Time delays
Variance in demand
Order
batching
Duplicationof activity
Risk aversion
processes
Large
stockpiles
Poor OTIF
operating
Product
commoditisation
Globalisation
…Market Backdrop
• Services transactional
• Margins eroded
• Outsourcing growth
• Complexity
• 25 % dissatisfaction…
• Leveraging opportunities
Transactional Logistics
• Transport
• Warehousing
• Container handling
• Stevedoring
• Shipping
• Freight forwarding
• Customs clearance
• Inventory
management
• LSP selection
• Coordination (4PL)
• Reverse logistics
• Parts management
Transactional SLAs & KPIs
• Time compression
• Service Costs
• Service quality
• Flow of product
• Lower unit cost
• Capacity utilisation
• OTIF
Adding Value…
• Project management
• Info management
• IT solutions
• Product customisation
• Compliance (e.g. WEE)
• +
• +
• Product re-processing Local sourcing
• Packaging reduction
• CO2/ case delivered
• RFID support
• Returns logistics
• +
• +
Adding Value…
• Effective processes…
• Consumer focussed… ?
CollaborationCoordinationCooperationOpen Market
Negotiations
Framework Roadmap…
≈ Price based≈ Adversarial
≈ Fewer suppliers≈ Longer term
contracts
≈ Info links≈ WIP links≈ EDI Exchange
≈ S/C integration≈ Joint Planning≈ Technology sharing
Collaborative Team’s Objective
• Optimise solutions
• Product features
• Service features
• Reduce misalignment
• Info flows
• Manpower
Collaborative Team’s Objectives
• Re-align asset utilisation
• Diagnose opportunities
• Integrated action plan
• Pro-active follow-through
• Engage in differentiation
e.g. postponed customisation@ UK warehouse by 3PL
Collaborative Value Add No 1
e.g. on-location spare partsfitting by in-bound transport 3PL
Collaborative Value Add No 2
Collaborative Value Add No 3
e.g. Transport LSP reduces Retail Usercarbon footprint
Collaborative Environments…
Create a culture of collaboration
Create the opportunity formanagers to think collaboratively
Create a framework forcollaboration
Direction of Collaboration
• Vertical &
horizontal
collaboration
• Holistic - source to
end-consumer
• Non-transactional +
transactional Externalcollaboration(customers)
Externalcollaboration(competitors)
Internalcollaboration
Externalcollaboration
(suppliers)
Externalcollaboration
(otherorganisations)
Source: Adapted from Barratt 2004
HorizontalCollaborativeeg transportmanagement
VerticalCollaborationeg transportmanagement
Plan for collaboration
Traditional Frameworks…?
• Not the main LSA
• Negotiated arm’s length, adversarial
• Formal – ITT, contract, renewal/termination
• Not geared to “possibilities”
• Transactional by nature
• Often relatively short term
• Risk averse
• Transactional SLAs & KPIs c.f. effectiveness
• Resource specific & constrained
• Traditionally static for term
CFAs – a framework for Collaboration
• Constitution
• Steering committee
• Objectives
• Contributions
• Cost recovery
• IP ownership
• Liability
• + Rules / Code of Practice
• + Ops Guidelines
Characteristics of CFA’s…
• Trust & relationship based
• Planned goals
• Prescribed participation
• Resourced by Sponsor(s)
• Shared management
• Limited risk & liability
Characteristics of CFA’s…
• “Own account” participation
• Shared responsibility
• Multi-party c.f. dual party
• Multi-channel communication
• Specific outcome applications eg IP
• Joint guidelines eg IT
Characteristics of CFA’s…
• Strategic objectives -possibilities
• Reasonable endeavours
• Know-how sharing
• Confidential
• Shared benefits & rewards
• Long term
• Dynamic & flexible
Characteristics of CFA’s…
• Competition compliant & enhancing
• Non-solicitation codes
• Data protection
• Non-binding & Binding + dispute ADR
• Expulsion eg code breach
• Exclusion of agency, joint venture & partnership law
• Process & Consumer focussed c.f. cost
Collaborative Value Add No 4
e.g. pooled IT applicationssourced from participants…
• ASN advance shipment
notification
• Automated storage & retrieval
systems (AS / RS)
• Electronic data interchange (EDI)
• XML / EDI
• Bar coding
• RFID tags
• Voice input services
• Portal technologies
• Internet applications
• RF communications (wireless
LAN)
• Electronic market places
• Extranets
• Intranets
• Satellite communications
technology
• Decision support systems (DSS,
data warehousing)
• Warehouse management systems
• etc…
CFA’s
Conventional Contract -LSA, TSA, WSA etc
Conventional Contract vs CFA…
…some outcomes extend LSA
Mission of S/C Collaboration
• Sponsor’s competitive advantage
• Customer focussed
• Improved processes
Non-CollaborationDirect:
• De-selected from bidder
list
• Profit / margin erosion
• Loss of business
• No investors, sale or exit
Indirect:
• EU WTD
• WEE Directive
• Congestion charges
• Loading restrictions
• H&S compliance
• Price of fuel
• Driver shortages
• Insurance premiums
• Poor asset utilisation
• Environmental
vs Collaboration…Upside:
• Relationships reinforced
• best practice spread
• Contracts & business grows
• Profits increase
• Value grows – business, investor & exit
• “Win-Win” not “I-Win”
Creating innovative customer centric 3PL & 4PL
service contracts &
collaborative frameworks whilst raising profit: realising
the elusive "Win-Win"…