the role of the organization presented by: justus van pletzen “ quo vadis tussenganger? ” / “...

28
The role of the organization Presented by: Justus van Pletzen QUO VADIS TUSSENGANGER?” / “QUO VADIS INTERMEDIARY?”

Upload: korey-carll

Post on 15-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

The role of the organization

Presented by: Justus van Pletzen

“QUO VADIS TUSSENGANGER?” / “QUO VADIS INTERMEDIARY?”

REALITIES

Regulation Commoditisation – Consumerism Value of the intermediary (lack – perception) Image and Reputation

o Wfiio IAIS

- Core principles 18/24

The three strategic pillars

COMMUNICATION (HOW)

Technology New Connect

o Dailyo Weekly – Indabao Monthly – Inform

Selective – What is relevant for me One consistent message through structures Regional Coordinators Branches Regional Conferences

REPRESENTATION (WHAT)

Threats (Reality or Perception) October 2004 (FAIS) 14700 FSPs July 2012 10750 FSPs 3206 Cancelled

o Consolidationo Retire/ Leave the industryo Fraud (minority)

REPRESENTATION (WHAT) New entrants (Human Capital Initiative Level playing fields Direct Aggregators Economy (Section 8) Banks (One fits all) FAIS Ombud determinations (Due diligence) COSTS…………… Image and Reputation Remuneration Education – (In general) Transformation

TWIN PEAKS

National Treasury - Prudential FSB – Conduct CMS Inseta SAM TCF FSGLAB Binder Regulations

RECENT SUCCESSES Binder agreements RE Level 1 exams RE Level 2 exams Health Care fees Human Capital Project Code of Conduct FIA Members are informed Broker mandates – direct FSGLAB Value of the intermediary (FIA) President of Wfii Exco member of Wfii FIA Awards Pro-intermediary Campaign

CHALLENGES

Capacity to represent all disciplines in the industry

Our own worst enemy

Trust the leaders you elect and believe in them

Member priorities

PRODUCT LIFE STAGES APPROACH TO TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)

FSA (UK)

The FSA began studying the TFC programme in 2000, published its first paper in 2001, and the programme

was officially launched in 2005.

Realties in the UK:

1. A change of mindset of the industry

2. Clarity of regulatory expectations

3. Education to encourage consumer responsibility

4. A supervisory approach that is pre-emptive and intensive

5. Enforcement and compliance

Product life cycle

Cultural FrameworkCultural Framework

Desired Outcomes

Developing products for specific target markets, based on a clear understanding of the likely needs and financial capability of each group of

customers

Desired Outcomes

Marketing products for specific target markets, based on a clear understanding of the likely needs and financial capability of each group of

customers

Communicating clearly and fairly the nature of the product before the consumer is “locked in”.

Desired Outcomes

Balancing the commercial objective of increasing sales with the objectives of Treating customers fairly.

With assessment, offering suitable alternatives to consumers.

Desired Outcomes

Providing clear and appropriate information, making charges transparent.

Being clear to customers about what the firm, its products and services offer.

Desired Outcomes

Monitoring and responding appropriately to changes in the wider environment that may affect products and impact on particular classes of new or existing

customers.

Desired Outcomes

Honouring representations, assurances and promises that lead to legitimate customer expectations.

Identifying common underlying causes of complaints and taking action to eliminate the root cause.

Culture Change: Six Key Drivers

Leadership Strategy Decision making Controls Recruitment, training and competence Reward

FSB’s TCF initiative

FSB published a TCF discussion paper at the end of April 2010 which

introduces TCF concept and contextualises it by dealing with specific

examples

Stakeholder workshops to debate TCF

Cross-sectoral task team

External consultant

FSA Stakeholder Workshop

Considering comments received

Key elements

Culture Change

• Fair treatment at the heart of company’s business• NOT a compliance function• Ownership of TCF should rest at Board and Senior

Management level• Board/Senior Management must embed culture of TCF at all

levels of organisation• Further guidance on TCF culture framework and a self-

assessment tool will be published

Key elements

Revisiting the regulatory framework

• Challenges of rules based approach vs outcomes based approach to regulation

• Combination of rules/principles in regulation so that the ‘spirit’ of what the regulator wants to achieve is made clear

• Gap analysis of legislation of FSB to determine if all elements of TCF are adequately covered and to ensure alignment across sectors.

• Guidance notes on TCF best practice will be published

Key elements

Revisiting the supervisory approach to market conduct

Reactive approach vs proactive approach Increased focus on thematic on-site visits / testing of outcomes on the

ground (for instance by way of mystery shopping)

Creating the right incentives

Relying on financial institution to do the right thing : TCF not likely to succeed Visible enforcement of TCF principles, increased probability of detection,

higher cost of non-compliance (steep penalties) Enforcement Committee Other forms of redress

Key elements

Consumer Education and Co-ordination with Ombuds

Consumers also have a responsibility to understand rights/obligations

TCF and Consumer Education must go hand in hand –

- Asymmetry of information

- Generally complex nature of financial products

- Consumer Education Department

Next Steps

Roadmap document Evaluation of comments and setting out what FSB will do next and how Published by year-end

Self-assessment pack Briefing document Self-assessment tool Initial focus on product providers Piloted process, published for industry to use

Benchmark study Survey of firms based on self-assessment tool Interviews with firms Publication of assessment and report

Supervisory Gap Sub Committee Regulatory Gap Sub Committee

Conclusion

TCF aims to elevate fair treatment of consumers on

agendas of financial institutions.

Behavioural change will be a multiyear project

After consideration of comments on discussion paper-

Issuance of more detailed guidance on what the FSB

expects of firms in applying TCF.

Obligation will be on Board/Senior Management to

undertake a TCF self-assessment

Thank you