shuntaro sano portfolio
DESCRIPTION
Portfolio since I have been the UKTRANSCRIPT
PORTFOLIO
2010-2014SHUNTAROSANO‘s
Brass, watercolour paper, japanese paper, plywood,1000 x 700 x 400
MA architectural design, Facade design project :
Blurred Space
EXHIBITION
SHOMEI EXHIBITION 2007 | Octorber 2007 | product designerSHOMEI EXHIBITION 2008 | Octorber 2008 | director & curator & product designer
ZUKOU EXHIBITION 2009 | December 2009 | director & curatorZUKOU EXHIBITION 2008 | September 2008 | advertize manager & chief exihibitor
Tokyo University of Science diploma exhibition | Aplil 2011 | ExhibitorTOKYO 2050 // 12 VISIONS FOR METROPOLIS | September 2011 | main planner & Resercher De Montfort University Degree Show | June 2014 | Exhibitor & Pavilion Designer and Constructor
AFFILIATIONS
Associate Member - September 2009 - present
Associate Member - April 2010 - presentAIJ [Architectual Institute of Japan ]
JAIPAT [ The Japan Interior Planners Association , Tokyo ]
SKILLS AutoCADRhinocerosVectorworksArchCADRevitCinema4D3D StudioMaxPhotoshop / I l lustrator / IndesignHand Model Making
2 years3 years5 years1 year1 month3 years6 months5 years7 years
CONTACT
Tel : +44(0)7454707337
Name : Shuntaro Sano
PASSION : No matter where and when, I can devote myself to develop any projects.
Nationarity : JapaneseDate of Birth : 8, 10, 1986Gender : Male
Mail : [email protected]
Home adress : 1293-3-502 , Sakusabecho , Inage-ku , Chiba-city , 263-0014 JapanCurrent adress : 39 Beaconsfield Road, Leicester, LE3 0FG, United Kingdom
EDUCATION
Deans List | April 2007 - Present
Tokyo University of Science | Faculty of Engineering Division1 | Department of Architecture
Classification | Major GPA 3.30Bachelor of engeneering in Architecture | | 2007 - 2011
Tokyo University of Science | Faculty of Architect | 2011 - 2012Reserch Student of Architecture and Urban Design
De Montfort Universi ty | Master of Art | MA Architectural Design | 2012 - 2013Classification | Upper Second Class Honours (2:1)
De Montfort Universi ty | Master of Architecture ( RIBA Part II ) | 2013 - PresentClassification | Upper Second Class Honours (2:1)
Elected final presentator of the design studios | Diploma | 2011Third year | 2010
Second year | 2009
Tokyo University of Science | Faculty of Science and Technology | Department of Civil Engennring Transfered to Department of Architecture | 2005 - 2007
UIA 2011 TOKYO | September 2011 | Elected Poster Session
TAJIMA encouragement award The design competition of Architectual Institute of Japan | 2011
UK
UK
Japan
Japan
Japan
001
PROFESSIONALARCHITECTURALEXPERIENCE
junya . ishigami + associate ( http://www.jnyi.jp )Intern Architect | May 2008 - September 2008
Worked as an ingtegral member of constructing installation design team on Venice Biennale of Architecture
Rengousekkeisha Ichigaya Architects., INC. ( http://www.rengodms.co.jp )
Intern Architect | October 2009 - March 2011
Worked as an integral member of design team provided schematic design, documentation, and presentation
Assistant Architect | April 2011 - April 2012
KUS Architect ( http://www.kus.co.jp )Intern Architect | July 2010 - October 2010 , April 2011 - November 2011
Worked as an designer and a model maker of design team“Team timberize ’’ promoting wood structure skyscrapper project
SUPPOSE DESIGN OFFICE ( http://www.suppose.jp )Intern Architect | September 2008 - March 2010
Worked as an ingtegral member of constructinginstallation design team on several exhibition projects
Milano Salone // luceste | May 2010
Design Tide Tokyo 2008Design Tide Tokyo 2009
Except // Exihibition of toto gallery | August 2010
Nature Factory in DIESEL denim gallery | August 2009
The hill of water and sculpture at ichihara-city | April 2010
REFERENCES
INTERPERSONALSKILLS
Ben Cowd Dr. Timothy MartinDeputy Head of LSA(Leicester School of Architecture)Head of MA architectural designEmail: [email protected]: +44(0) 116 207 8441
Head of History and Theory and Criticism realmSupervisor for MA and MArch Dissertation at LSAEmail: [email protected]: +44(0) 116 257 7572
002
Footbal l | Represented the youth team at county levelPosi t ion : r ight wing-back
I love Cooking Japanese food, Snowboarding, and Mountaineer ing.
Interests
Assistant Chef I June 2005 - March 2011HamaBouchou( Local Japanese Food Restaurant)
Assistant Chef and Waiter I March 2010 - March 2011( Italian Cafe and Dinning )Dinner Qui
Assisstant Teacher I April 2012 - June 2012Kwai jyuku ( Clum School for Japanese Exam,which is equivalent as GCSE or A level )
De Montfort University International Addmission OfficeJapanese Student Ambassador I October 2012 - Present
Other jobs
Japanese | Excel lent [ mother tongue]Engl ish | Excel lent [working knowledge in wr i t ing & researching]Chinese | lower intermadiate
Language Spoken
Scotland
Glasgow
Site views001. Entrance from north side002. The middle of hill003. Early of hill on north side004. Early of hill on south side005. Entrance from south side
Glasgow
The United Kingdam
Legend
Public Building
Site area
Housing
Religious Building
Hotels
Unrelative buildings
Counter line
Road
Pedestrian path
Foot path for Pedestrian
Highway ( M8 )
Oneway direction
Access point to the site
Si te p lanN
Peripheral Analysis and MappingLocation : 193, Buccleuch Street, Glasgow
SlowfoodCooking schoolVegitation Lab
Pink corrennle GraniteYellow limestoneCream sandstone
Charls Renny MackintoshScottish Ba
Urban FarmIron industry
Luxuary restaurantVanacular Design
Urbanity for topography
FastfoodBargerKebab
TakeawayDoughnuts
Fish n Chips
One of the worstUnhealty place
in Europa
GLASGOWImproving Glasgow Diet “ Cookery, Food School, Laboratory ,and RestaurantLocation : 193, Buccleuch Street, Glasgow
Aerial View, For the Site From North
Improving Glasgow Diet “ Cookery, Food School, Laboratory ,and RestaurantLocation : 19, Buccleuch Street, Glasgow
The roof view is matched with the surrounding roofscape. on My design, the traditional Scottish Slate was chosen to show the roof scape.In Glasgow, the roof morphology has variation. Therefore, the complex shapes would be the orchestra of the glasweigian atmosphere. in additon to the materiality of roof, the building are made of “Masonry structure” which means the sand stone originally from glasgow have been chosen to show the harmony of secnery. The colours of sandstones, beige and red are allocated by the succession of houses. Therefore, therange of organised design would be captured by the simplisity and complexity.
A-A’ Long Main Elevation
B-B’ Long Main Section
Improving Glasgow Det “ Cookery, Food school and LaboratoryLocation : 139, Buccleuch Street Glasgow
plan, GL + 11,000plan, GL + 8,000plan, GL + 4,000 plan, GL + 14,000 plan, GL + 17 ,000
Di f ferent var ie ty of access where can be explored on th is s i te sha l l provide def ferent moments for food to the customers and res idents . 5 def fe t rent approachs are des igned for the journey f rom bottom to top of Garnnet h i l l . Each of those entrances have contextura l des ign such as mater ia l i ty , l andscape, and conceptual ly re la t ing to program. 1. Topography model 2. Primal Study model 3. Final model from north
Sustainability strategy
-
-
roof construct ions late roof ( 110 x 330 mm, t = 5 mm ) Batten ( 37 x 40 mm, @ 120mm )Moisture-di ffus ing roof sheet ing ( t = 2 mm )Or iented-strand board ( t = 24mm )Cel lu lose-fiver thermal insulat ion ( 105 mm )I - beam ( 200 mm x 280 mm ,@ 7200mm ) / Air cav i ty / counter c - channel ( 150 x 75 mm, @ 900mm )Counter stee l p late welded to I -beam ( 50 x 5 mm, @ 600 mm )Or iented-strand board ( t = 15mm )Batten ( 35 x 35 mm, @ 600mm ) / A i r cav i tyFir p lanks ( t = 25mm )
Toughened glass ( t = 10 mm ) + cav i ty ( 16mm ) + laminated safety g lass in steel-a lumin ium frame ( 20 mm )
s late roof ( 110 x 330 mm, t = 5 mm ) Batten ( 37 x 40 mm, @ 120mm )Moisture-di ffus ing roof sheet ing ( t = 2 mm )Or iented-strand board ( t = 12 mm )Cel lu lose - fiver thermal insulat ion ( t = 75mm ) Steel hol low column ( 300 x 300 mm , t = 12 mm )C - channel ( 78 x 48 mm )Or iented-stramd board ( t = 21 mm)Fi r p lanks ( t = 25mm )
1 re inforcement f composi te beam : 400 / 200mm I - beam pre-tensioned2 fa i 8mm sta in less- stee l threaded rod, suspended3 50 / 230 / 50 mm cast g lass b locks with depress ions for meta l4 40 / 4 mm steel - flat r ibbons5 5mm sheet -stee l insert6 2 mm steel sect ion7 28 / 230 mm stee l fin8 4mm si l icone seam sealer and po l y thene sealant9 1.5 mm sta in less- stee l p lanter10 400/ 600 / 15 mm stone, re inforced mortar bed 4.5mm sheet-steel substrate, galvan ised 100 / 100 / 6 / 8 mm steel H-beam, ga lvanised 6 mm steel - channel grat ing, ga lvanised l iqu id waterproofing, fleece-re inforced concrete11 40mm mortat , t rowel led, painted12 sheel-stee l gutter
A B C
Roo
f P
lan
Cei
lin
g pl
an
B Detail section C. Detail section A Detail section
D Detail section E Detail section F Detail section G Detail section
Car Park
Semi Exterior Approach
Dining area 01
Dining area 02
Elevation for Detail
CH = 2,800 mmCH = 5,250 mm
H = 2,050 mm
H = 250 mm
GL + 12,920 mm
GL + 8,920 mm
GL + 7,830 mm
GL + 0 mm
GL - 5,610 mm
CH = 8,230 mm
H. Glazing facade and wood deck 1 : 20
column: Ø 140 / 20 mm steel CHS, coated and pol ishedcladding at edge of floor deck : 2 mm alumin ium sheet double g laz ing ( panel s ize : 1500 / 6050 mm , 10 mm toughened glass + 12 mm cav i ty + 2 x 10 mm laminated safe ty g lass)facade post40 x 120 mm steel sheet, 2.5 mm alumin ium sheet c ladding pol ishedsteel grat ing, ga lvanised thermal insulat ion underneath sash
column: Ø 140 / 20 mm steel CHS, coated and pol ishedcladding at edge of floor deck : 2 mm alumin ium sheet double g laz ing ( panel s ize : 1500 / 6050 mm , 10 mm toughened glass + 12 mm cav i ty + 2 x 10 mm laminated safe ty glass)facade post40 x 120 mm steel sheet, 2.5 mm alumin ium sheet c ladding pol ishedsteel grat ing, ga lvanised thermal insulat ion underneath sash
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
A-A’ Section for Detail
Having strategy of environmental issue, the geometry of this site would be useful to combine current sustainability technology. First idea of this issue is using tromb wall for the vegitation laboratory and green house. in addition to this, circulating and ventirating those air to the other spaces shall save the amount of energy to manage this dietry in Glasgow. Second of all, effectively install the geothermal energy underneath this hill. Glasgow has a high potencial of ground resouses to develop itself to sustainability city. Therefore, the making topographical jouney for architectural scene and sustainability would orchestrate edge of glasgow city centre to healthier city phisically.
Glazing facade and wood deck`column: Ø 140 / 20 mm steel CHS, coated and pol ishedcladding at edge of floor deck : 2 mm alumin ium sheet double g laz ing ( panel s ize : 1500 / 6050 mm , 10 mm toughened glass + 12 mm cavi ty + 2 x 10 mm laminated safety g lass)
facade post40 x 120 mm steel sheet, 2.5 mm alumin ium sheet c ladding pol ishedsteel grat ing, galvanised thermal insulat ion underneath sash
G
F
E
D
A
Car Park
Elevation for Detail
GL - 5,610 mm
A-A’ Section for Detail
B-B’ Section for environmental strategy
H
B
C
Image A : Exteria Perspective View
Image B : Courtyard View
Image C : Laboratory Interior View
Image D : Canteen Interior View
Sketch 001 : Initial sketch of exterior wall
Sketch 002 : Intrim sketch of Laboratory’s facade
Sketch 003 : development of Laboratory’s plan
Sketch 004 : Initial sketch of Canteen
Karakuwa Banya Project
Layout Map
Scale S = 1 : 5 0 0 日付 2 0 / S e p / 2 0 1 1
2 , 2 1 5 × 4 , 0 0 0
2 4 , 0 0 0 × 1 1 , 0 0 0
2 2 , 1 5 0 × 4 , 4 3 0
冷蔵設備
N
Building
既存漁業施設等
130 0
0
2 0 0 0
1 00 0
6 , 0 9 6 × 2 , 4 3 8コンテナ
止水管
■ 配置図 S = 1 / 5 0 0■ S = 1 / 5 0 0
1 5 0 0
1 8 0 0
3 6 0
4 0 0
- 6 0
+ 1 0 0
+ 5 0
+ 5 0
① ( 3 1 . 1 9 9 × 9 . 6 7 6 ) / 2 = 1 5 0 . 9 4 0
② ( 4 0 . 8 0 7 × 5 . 2 0 0 ) / 2 = 1 0 6 . 0 9 8
③ ( 4 0 . 8 0 7 × 1 5 . 4 7 5 ) / 2 = 3 1 5 . 7 4 4
④ ( 1 7 . 5 0 2 × 3 . 9 8 4 ) / 2 = 3 4 . 8 6 3
⑤ ( 1 7 . 5 0 2 × 1 . 8 4 6 ) / 2 = 1 6 . 1 5 4
⑥ ( 1 0 . 2 2 6 × 2 . 9 5 8 ) / 2 = 1 5 . 1 2 4
⑦ ( 7 . 4 3 2 × 1 . 8 4 4 ) / 2 = 6 . 8 5 2
⑧ ( 3 . 4 3 9 × 0 . 5 2 8 ) / 2 = 0 . 9 0 7
⑨ ( 5 8 . 2 5 9 × 1 8 . 4 1 1 ) / 2 = 5 3 6 . 3 0 3
⑩ ( 5 8 . 2 5 9 × 4 . 8 2 6 ) / 2 = 1 4 0 . 5 7 8
⑪ ( 4 6 . 3 6 2 × 2 . 0 7 7 ) / 2 = 4 8 . 1 4 6
⑫ ( 4 1 . 9 0 0 × 2 . 2 9 6 ) / 2 = 4 8 . 1 0 1
⑬ ( 3 5 . 9 4 0 × 3 . 5 7 1 ) / 2 = 6 4 . 1 7 0
⑭ ( 2 8 . 8 0 4 × 4 . 8 6 6 ) / 2 = 7 0 . 0 8 0
⑮ ( 2 3 . 5 1 0 × 3 . 0 3 3 ) / 2 = 3 5 . 6 5 2
⑯ ( 2 1 . 6 2 0 × 4 . 5 9 4 ) / 2 = 4 9 . 6 6 1
⑰ ( 2 1 . 0 8 1 × 4 . 7 8 0 ) / 2 = 5 0 . 3 8 3
⑱ ( 2 3 . 4 9 1 × 4 . 2 6 2 ) / 2 = 5 0 . 0 5 9
⑲ ( 2 7 . 3 9 0 × 3 . 2 4 1 ) / 2 = 4 4 . 3 8 5
⑳ ( 3 5 . 4 2 4 × 3 . 2 0 5 ) / 2 = 5 6 . 7 6 6
2 1 ( 3 6 . 6 2 6 × 4 . 9 6 1 ) / 2 = 9 0 . 8 5 0
2 2 ( 3 6 . 6 2 6 × 7 . 7 8 6 ) / 2 = 1 4 2 . 5 8 5
2 3 ( 3 6 . 2 8 0 × 1 2 . 2 2 6 ) / 2 = 2 2 1 . 7 7 9
= 2 2 9 6 . 1 4 7
± 0+ 6 0
- 6 0
①②
③
④
⑤
⑥
⑦
⑧
⑨⑩
⑪
⑫
⑬
⑭
⑮
⑯
⑰
⑱
⑲
2 1
⑳2 2
2 3
± 0± 0
± 0
± 0
± 0
± 0
± 0
± 0
± 0
± 0± 0
± 0
海
2 , 2 1 5 × 4 , 0 0 0
2 4 , 0 0 0 × 1 1 , 0 0 0
2 2 , 2 2 0 × 4 , 4 4 0
cooler
Fisherman facilities
1 30 0
0
2 0 0 0
1 00 0
6 , 0 9 6 × 2 , 4 3 8コンテナ
Pipe for sewage
■ S = 1 / 5 0 0
1 5 0 0
1 8 0 0
3 6 0
4 0 0
- 6 0
+ 1 0 0
+ 5 0
+ 5 0
± 0+ 6 0
- 6 0
± 0± 0
± 0
± 0
± 0
± 0
± 0
± 0
± 0
± 0± 0
± 0
海
敷地境界線
敷地境界線
敷地境界線
3 5 0 0
3 50 0
3 50 0
3 5 0 0
The table of Area calculated
The map of the site area calculated Layout
Container
Foundation Plan
Date 2 0 , S e p , 2 0 1 1Scale S = 1 : 1 0 0N
44
40
22
20
22
20
2 2 2 2 0
2 2 2 0 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 0 4 4 4 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 0
-500
-500
-500
mortar
2 2 2 0 2 2 2 5
1 5 0
-450
Reinforced rod and mesh
X 1 X 2 X 3 X 4 X 5 X 6 X 8X 7 X 9 X 1 0
Y1
Y2
Y3
X 1 1
Land Boundary
Main pillar
anchor bolt M = 1 2 L = 4 0 0
gadjet plates
joint between building and foundation
1 5 0
1/100
1/100
gradient for water
gradient for water
gradient for water
gradient for water
1/100
± 0
- 1 2 0
- 7 0± 0
+ 4 0- 1 1 0
+ 4 0
- 1 2 0
- 7 0
- 1 1 0
+ 5 0
+ 7 0
1/200
Karakuwa Banya Project
Fire protection Line
G L
Karakuwa Banya Project
West elevation
Date 2 0 , S e p , 2 0 1 1Scale S = 1 : 1 0 0
いろはにほへとちりぬる
foundation height: G L + 5 0 0
2 2 2 0 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 0
2 2 2 2 0
highest height: G L + 4 3 3 8
aluminium sash:2 1 4 5 × 1 9 3 0
brace:steelφ 9 ㎜turn buckle
maintenance hole:1 2 0 × 2 7 0
25
0
roof detail: insulation panel 4 2 m m 1 5 m m 2 4 m m
outside wall: insulation panel 4 2 m m( surface finish: galvanised steel 0 . 4 8 ㎜)
structural plywoodAsfalt roo�ng double
structural plywood
6 06 04 0 0
6 06 0
4 0 0
Karakuwa Banya Project
Detail Section
Scale S = 1 : 2 0 Date 2 0 , S e p , 2 0 1 1
anchor bolt anchor bolt
Roof:Insulation panel 4 2 m mAsphalt roofing doubleStructural plywood double 1 5 m m
Aluminium sash
Insulation panel 4 2 m m
mes-attachment
Beam:120 × 2 1 0
mortar t=20mm
6060
120
G L
1757550
250
35
05
00
20
timber 120mm×120mm
15
01
50
12
0
日軽断熱パネル 42mm
ベタ基礎 150mm
D10
main re-inforced rod
50
50
主筋 D13
主筋 D13
t=20mm
606047
120
G L
250
35
04
21
20
50
02
0
120mm×120mm
15
01
50
30
12
0
砕石 120mm
防湿シート t=0.1mm
捨てコンクリート 30mm
ベタ基礎 150mm
reinforced rod
D10reinforced rod
D13 main re-inforced rod
main re-inforced rodmain re-inforced rod
reinforced rod
reinforced rod
main re-inforced rod D13 main re-inforced rod D13
50
50
主筋 D13
主筋 D13
1 2
1757550
50
mortar t=20mm
60 60 30
120
G L
35
04
21
20
50
02
0
Timber 120mm×120mm
15
01
50
30
12
0
D10
D13
D10
50
70
D13
D13 D13
D13
175 75 50
250
50
Strength of Concrete 2 1 N / m ²
Aluminium tape Double
71
1 0 01
water gradientgutter:5 0 × 1 0
main re-inforced rod
main re-inforced rod
BANYA project
Having devastat ing earthquake at east japan in 2011, the swift action for recovering the damaged area. Not only residence for refugee but also the base for the commerce and business would be prioritised for self-idepen-dance in the future. For this role, these two self build projects are one of the quickest project to contribute archi tec tura l competence i t se l f to people who need the support of their life.
First project, "BANYA project in shidugawa" was planed quickly and donated the damaged construction material from lumberjack and construction company. And then, the planing had completed only for 1 month and been gathered the voluntary workers from university all over Japan, and carpenters who is based at the devastated area to construct them. In addition to this project, the second project "Oyster restaurant and hut at Karakuwa" also organised same association to revive oyster commerce. Successfully, this projects shone at the moment and still widely expanding their business.
- �e temporary �sherman hut after hit the East Japan Great Earthquake -
�e p
roces
s of c
onstr
uctio
n for
�rst
�she
rman
hut
at S
hidu
gaw
a
�e p
roces
s of c
onstr
uctio
n for
O
yster
Rest
aura
nt at
Kar
akuw
a
A. �e view from coast line B. �e appearance of entrance
004. Westside elevation003. Detail section
Apprication documents Completion images
Construction of foundation Construction of stractural pillers Finishing the Frame of structure
Construction of facade panelConstruction of roofConstruction of Stracture frame
Allocating the galbanised pre-galbanised panel Finishing touch of roof
Completion of hutConstruction of inside wall
001. Layout plan 002. Foundation plan
SHIZ
UG
AWA
BAN
YA
KARA
KUW
ABA
NYA
Floor plan / GL + 0 m Function
1 : Glass pavilion 0012 : Glass pavilion 0023 : Glass pavilion 0034 : Glass pavilion 0045 : Glass pavilion 0056 : Reception7 : Office8 : Green house 0019 : Green house 00210 : Green house 00311 : Kiosk12 : View Place13 : Soil Strage14 : Back Yard15 : Entrance Bridge16 : Court Yard17 : Sun Garden18 : Shade Garden19 : Sunken Garden20 : Hidden Canal
Site LocationCannaregio, Fondamentaa Misericordia, Venice, Italyaround the Marina
Cannaregio area is recoganised as a resident area with some travel place.That is why the hotels are venued in resident area and some big churchs also sited around here. This marina is used by residents as an important role of their traffic way. And this site has potencial abondaned garden used as phisically and philosophically connenctiong both of the island, Murano and Sant Michele. The closest boat terminal heading to Murano island and San Michele is bit far from this site and main tourist venues. Although people who want to see and get genuin Murano glass has no choice to use this boat stop to get there, if this garden and site are sophisticated, the residants and tourists can use here for exiciting experience with Murano glass and shadow and light.
ResidantsResidants boatPublic boatTourist
Botanical place and shop Glass museumGarden
Diagram for the functions
The dinamics of residents and tourist are separated at this site. Some popular places are distributed aroud here but less foreirgner come this site so far. If the new function put on here, the dinamics should be changed because of circuration from marina.
This facade face ro canal. Pleviously, this facade was closed. However, to open this facade and make pavement throu to marina works promote this site for murano island and San Michele. everybody knows the importance of both islands but all of them have to make longer way to reach to there. so this facade should anticipate both connection using vegitation and glass art.
South East Elevation
Pavilions for Murano Glass- -
Roof plan / GL + 5000 m
002 �e Main Floating Pvilion for Murano Glass - Hand Making Model -
001 Aearial view for Glass pavilions - Monochrome Render -
002002
003
003 �e Shadowscape of Murano glass pavilions - Hand Making Model -