PORT OF LONG BEACH

4

LEADING GATEWAY FOR U.S.-ASIA TRADE

STATE TIDELANDS TRUST

PROMOTE TRADE, BUILD PORT

6

WORLD’S 9TH BUSIEST PORT COMPLEX

PORT OF LONG BEACHPORT OF LOS ANGELES

*BASED ON 2017 CONTAINER CARGO VOLUMES

*millions of twenty-foot equivalent units (teus) or 20-foot-long containers

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

1. SHANGHAI, CHINA

2. SINGAPORE

3. SHENZHEN, CHINA

4. NINGBO, CHINA

5. HONG KONG

9. POLB/POLA

17. LOS ANGELES

22. LONG BEACH

2017 2016

BUSIEST CONTAINER PORTS

9

*millions of twenty-foot equivalent units (teus) or 20-foot-long containers

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1. LOS ANGELES

2. LONG BEACH

3. NEW YORK/NEW JERSEY

4. SAVANNAH

5. SEATTLE/TACOMA

2017 2016

BUSIEST U.S. CONTAINER PORTS

10

2006 2007

2008

2009

20102011 2012

2013

2017

20142015

2016

8.1 MILLION TEUs in 2018

HIGHEST IN PORT HISTORY

CONTAINER TOTALS THROUGH 2018

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

197

1

197

3

197

5

197

7

197

9

198

1

198

3

198

5

198

7

198

9

199

1

199

3

199

5

199

7

199

9

200

1

200

3

200

5

200

7

200

9

201

1

201

3

201

5

201

7

Empties Exports Imports

*millions of twenty-foot equivalent units (teus) or 20-foot-long containers

12

TOP TRADING PARTNERSTOTAL EXPORTS, CONTAINERS AND NON-CONTAINERS COMBINED

13

CHINA, 5,999,401 , 33%

JAPAN, 3,246,977 , 18%

OTHER, 3,155,135 , 17%

SOUTH KOREA, 1,551,065 , 9%

TAIWAN, 905,258 , 5%

INDONESIA, 826,766 , 5%MEXICO

4%AUSTRALIA, 730,628 , 4%

VIETNAM, 299,806 , 2%

INDIA, 488,966 , 3%

*BASED ON 2017 METRIC TONS

TOP TRADING PARTNERSTOTAL IMPORTS, CONTAINERS AND NON-CONTAINERS COMBINED

14

CHINA, 15,315,868 , 37%

OTHER, 11,506,087 , 28%

SAUDI ARABIA, 2,465,481 , 6%

PANAMA, 1,976,289 , 5%

SOUTH KOREA, 1,973,479 , 5%

IRAQ, 1,813,046 , 4%JAPAN

4% ECUADOR, 1,629,146 , 4%

MEXICO, 1,511,840 , 4%

ANGOLA, 1,158,617 , 3%

*BASED ON 2017 METRIC TONS

CARGO FORECAST

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

19

71

19

73

19

75

19

77

19

79

19

81

19

83

19

85

19

87

19

89

19

91

19

93

19

95

19

97

19

99

20

01

20

03

20

05

20

07

20

09

20

11

20

13

20

15

20

17

20

19

20

21

20

23

20

25

20

27

20

29

20

31

20

33

20

35

20

37

20

39

*millions of twenty-foot equivalent units (teus) or 20-foot-long containers

19901.5 M

20188.1 M

204018.5 M

17

CHICAGO

LONG BEACH

ATLANTA

HOUSTON

KANSAS CITY

DALLAS

MEMPHIS

CONNECTEDACCESS TO MAJOR U.S. RAIL HUBS

•BNSF and UP service both POLB and POLA

•Pacific Harbor Line handles on-dock rail operations within the Port, not the Class 1s

•Alameda Corridor provides rail service to Ports

Rail Operations

ON-DOCK RAIL TODAYVast Majority of Cargo Trucked Out of the Port

19

ON-DOCK24%

TRUCKED76%

ON-DOCK RAIL TOMORROWClean Air Action Plan Calls for At Least One-Third Rail

20

ON-DOCK35%

TRUCKED65%

$1 BILLIONInvestment in Rail Improvements

F o u r t h Tr a c k A t O c e a n

T. I . W y e Tr a c k R e a l i g n m e n t

D o u b l e Tr a c k A c c e s s F r o m P i e r G To J

PIER B ON-DOCK RAILON TRACK

FOR TOMORROW

• Maximize on-dock rail efficiency – More cargo on trains

• Relieve rail line congestion with expansion of storage tracks –accommodate up to 10,000-foot trains

• Reduce congestion on local streets and highways

• Enhance utilities and modernize aging infrastructure

• Improve motorist and rail safety by eliminating existing at-grade crossing at 9th Street and Pico Avenue

Pier B On-Dock Rail Support Facility

Project Objectives

Pier B On-Dock Rail Support Facility

Pier B

No Project Alternative – Pier B On-Dock Support Facility

Locomotive Layover and Fueling Area

Widen Bridge Over Dominguez Channel to Add

One Additional Track

Add 5 Arrival/Departure

Tracks

Add 31 Tracks

Remove Shoemaker

Ramps

Close 9th

Street Rail Crossing

Realign Pico AvenuePier B

12TH STREET ALTERNATIVE – PIER B ON-DOCK SUPPORT FACILITY

Add 4 Tracks on Pico Ave.

Realign and Widen Pier B Street

Connects to Alameda

Corridor

BUILD 5 NEW 10,000 FT ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE TRACKS

SERVE UP TO 17 TRAINS PER DAY

EXPAND RAIL YARD

4X STORAGE CAPACITY

CONSTRUCT 1 YARD LEAD ON EAST END

CONSTRUCT 2 YARD LEADS ON WEST END

STREAMLINE ON-DOCK RAIL FLOW

CONSTRUCT NEW LOCOMOTIVE LAYOVER FACILITY

RESUPPLY 24 LOCOMOTIVES

ALLEVIATE NETWORK CONGESTION

IMPROVE AT-GRADE CROSSING SAFETY

IMPROVE PIER B ST. &PICO AVE.

CLOSE AT-GRADE CROSSINGS

IMPROVE ROADWAYSAFETY AND CAPACITY

Higher ACTA Revenuedue to rail growth

Mode ShiftFrom Truck to Rail

Reduced ShippingCost

Improved Competitiveness

Lower Emissions

PROGRAM BENEFITS

$870MRISK BASED CONTINGENCYESCALATIONPROPERTY ACQUISITIONOIL FIELD RELOCATIONUTILITY RELOCATION

9TH ST AT-GRADE CROSSING CLOSUREEARLY RAIL IMPROVEMENTSPIER B ST FREIGHT CORRIDOR RECONSTRUCTIONRAIL YARD EXPANSION

BASELINE PROGRAM

BUDGET

$870 MILLION PIER B BUDGET ($millions)

35

RIGHT OF WAY, UTILITIES, $567

PHASE 1, $42

PHASE 2, $112

PHASE 3, $109 PLANNING, $35

• NEPA/CEQA environmental review

• Tidelands Trust obligations

• Eminent domain/acquisition issues

• Rail agreements

• Funding options and associated regulatory requirements

Regulatory/Legal Hurdles

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 20242018

PROGRAM BASELINE SCHEDULE

Advertise to Award Engineering Contract

JULY JUNE

30% Des i gn Deve l opmen t

JULY MAR

DEC

9th Street At-Grade Crossing Closure

Detai led Design & Right of Way

MAR JUN

$40M

$70M

$170M

$270M

$370M

R a i l P h a s e 1

MAR JUN

S t r e e t a n d U t i l i t y C o n s t r u c t i o n

NOV AUG

PROGRAM BASELINE SCHEDULE

2024 2025 2026 2028 2029 20302027 2031 2032

NOV MAR

Rail Phase 2 Construction

JUNMAR

Rail Phase 3 Construction

$370M

$470M

$570M

$670M

$770M

$870M $870M

FREQUENT UPDATES

FINANCIAL PLAN

SEQUENCED DELIVERY

14 YEARSTARGET: $870M

AND BENEFITS

AND STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH

STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH

• UPDATE PUBLIC ON PIER B STATUS

• PERIODIC COMMUNITY MEETINGS

• TARGETED E-NEWSLETTER

• WEBSITE AND SOCIAL MEDIA

Questions?