mixed method a brief history - fed.cuhk.edu.hk

6
2008/10/10 1 Mixed methods EDM 6402 Qualitative Method in Educational Research Lai Man Hong Department of Educational Administration and Policy, CUHK HTB 302, 26096454 [email protected] Research questions Who should organized and pay for the education and training of working adults? Who participate in adult education and training programs, and why do they participate? What are the strengths and limitations of different types of education and training that purport to improve worker competencies? Mixed Method Mixed method studies are those that combine the qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research methodology of a single study (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 1998) A brief history

Upload: others

Post on 09-Feb-2022

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

2008/10/10

1

Mixed methodsEDM 6402

Qualitative Method in Educational Research

Lai Man Hong

Department of Educational Administration and Policy, CUHK

HTB 302, 26096454

[email protected]

Research questions

• Who should organized and pay for the education and training of working adults?

• Who participate in adult education and training programs, and why do they participate?

• What are the strengths and limitations of different types of education and training that purport to improve worker competencies?

Mixed Method

• Mixed method studies are those that combine the qualitative and quantitative

approaches into the research methodology

of a single study (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 1998)

A brief history

2008/10/10

2

• Third methodological movement (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003)

• adolescence

• The ultimate goal of any research project is to answer the questions that were set

forth at the project’s beginning.

• Because social phenomena are so complex, different kinds of methods are needed to best understand these complexities (greene & Caracelli, 1997)

• Mixed methods are becoming increasingly popular, especially because they are often more efficient in answering research questions than either the qualitative or the quantitative approach alone (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 1998)

• Methods should be mixed in a way that has complementary strengths (Johnson & Turner, 2003)

• Mixed methods provide the opportunity for presenting a greater diversity of divergent views.

• Mixed methods research provides stronger inferences

• A major advantages of mixed methods research is that it enables the researcher to simultaneously answer confirmatory and exploratory questions, and therefore verify and generate theory in the same study.

• Whether mixed methods, as compared to other designs, best addresses the research problem?

• Are both qualitative and quantitative research questions raised?

• Are conclusions drawn from both the qualitative and quantitative data?

Example

• Steven (2002)

• Hypothesis: teachers in schools with distinguished educator (DE) would perform better on measures of teacher effectiveness than would teachers in school without the DE

• How this had occurred?

2008/10/10

3

Title

• Adolescent development and transition to motherhood: a mixed methods study

Major types of mixed methods

research• Triangulation design

QUAN QUAL

QUAN + QUAL

• Embedded design

qual

QUAN

QUAN (qual)

quan

QUALQUAL (quan)

• Explanatory design

QUAN qual QUAN qual

• Exploratory design

qaul QUAN qual QUAN

Choosing a research design

• Theoretical drive

• Orientation (dominant, less dominant)

• Sequence

• Researchers should carefully select a single design that best matches the research problem. This will make the study more manageable and simpler to implement and describe.

2008/10/10

4

Choosing a research design

• A primary consideration is that the design should

match the research problem

• Researchers should evaluate their own

expertise

• Consideration must also be given to the

available resources (time, funding)

Choosing a research design

• Timing

– The sequence of data collection

• Weighting

– The relative weight of the quantitative and

qualitative approaches

• Mixing

– The approach to mixing the two datasets

• qual → QUAN

– Sequential exploratory design

• QUAN → qual

• quan → QUAL

– Sequential explanatory design

Sampling

• Probability sample (QUANs) ------Purposive samples (QUALs)

• The sampling strategy should stem logically from the conceptual framework as well as from the research questions being addressed by the study

• The sample should be able to generate a thorough database on the type of phenomena under study

• The sample should at least allow the possibility of drawing clear inferences from the data, the sample should allow for credible explanation

• the sampling plan should be feasible

• 61 firms, 8700 employees

• Stratified random sampling– Manufacturing and service sectors

– Major industries and trades

– Firms with different types of ownership– Firms of different sizes ranging from large to medium to small

– One or two intact work groups or production lines on the floor for a vertical sample consisting of all personnel at a work site

• Purposive sampling:

– Three enterprise with different level of technological change

– Workers with different job training experiences

2008/10/10

5

• In sequential mixed methods studies,

information from the first sample is often

required so as to draw the second sample.

• A probability sample is drawn first to test

hypotheses based on the extant literature. Then,

a purposive sample is selected to assess

research questions that go beyond what is

known in the current literature.

Making inferences

• Convergence – Life course pattern of males

– Their views, subjective perceptions, personal stock taking over their occupational lives.

– The theoretical statements were first tested deductively through quantitative empirical data.

– A second empirical study using qualitative methods to provided additional evidence for the theoretical hypothesis and to validate the assumption.

Making inferences

• Complementary– The level of school education

– Sociodemographic status of father

– Investment in human capital? / home atmosphere?

– Cultural capital / class exclusion in school?

– It can be meaningfully applied in all cases where one single research method does not suffice to collect adequate and enough empirical data to support the initial theoretical assumption

– In such cases, quantitative and qualitative methods serve different purposes and help to illuminate different aspects of the sociological phenomenon under study.

– Qualitative and quantitative results are not interchangeable.

Making inferences

• Complementary– Many young people were successful in their job

– They were highly criminal during their leisure time

– The empirical data analyzed by statistical means provided only limited evidence

– It served as a starting point for a second empirical inquiry

– It was possible to show that initially assumed relation among employment status, delinquency, and severity of punishment was far more complex than expected – an insight that would not have been acquired using one single method.

2008/10/10

6

Making inferences

• Divergence– Transition from schooling to work in East Germany– Quan: official allocation authority

– Qual: the role of individual job seeking

– The official allocation authority legitimizing the individual actions of graduates

– In many cases, outcomes of qualitative and quantitative research may at first sight even contradict each other

– The qualitative data thereby revealed that the simple and straightforward picture produced by quantitative data was incorrect and misleading

– “Double-speak”

• Divergence– It may be necessary to revise and modify the

initial theoretical assumptions

– To explain the inconsistent and divergent findings, it is then necessary to seek theoretical concepts and statements that can change the divergence of results to convergence or complementary