jon machin

19
Overview of State-of-the Art Techniques in Geotechnical Survey Jon Machin Director UTEC Geomarine 1

Upload: vanxuyen

Post on 27-Dec-2016

249 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Jon Machin

Overview of State-of-the Art Techniques in Geotechnical Survey

Jon Machin Director UTEC Geomarine

1

Page 2: Jon Machin

Topics •  Traditional Surface Core Drilling •  Emergence of Robotics – Subsea and ROV’s •  ROV Conveyed Testing Systems •  Robotic Core Drilling •  Future Technologies

Page 3: Jon Machin

Surface core drilling

Traditional Surface Drill Ship Fleet The Surface Drilling Technique

Page 4: Jon Machin

Emergence of subsea technology

Recent Advances in Last 10 years

Images: Machin, Fugro, Published Magazine Covers

Page 5: Jon Machin

Introducing ROV’s Robots in Industry Est. ~1M Industrial Robots*

60% in Automotive Production*

From Space, Factory to Ocean

*EU Figure

Images courtesy Oceaneering

Page 6: Jon Machin

A Typical Day at Work ROV originally human diver mimic ISO 13628-8 now standardizes many ROV

interfaces in subsea oilfield equipment General survey, inspection and intervention tasks Increasingly sophisticated work packages

Introducing ROV’s

ROV Meets Diver!

ROV Controls Wellhead ROV Drills Geotechnical Core

Images: Machin

Page 7: Jon Machin

geoROVTM  

Introducing geoROVTM

• Developed by UTEC Geomarine 2009

• ROV-conveyed seabed testing unit

• Based around the proven concept of the Cone

Penetration Test (CPT).

• CPT to 5m, Sampling to 1m.

• Easy interface with a standard work class

ROV of opportunity.

• Additional ROV-conveyed tools under

development….

Page 8: Jon Machin

CPT – Why?

Cone Penetration Test – developed by the Dutch in the 1950s to investigate soil conditions

Measured parameters (tip and

sleeve earth pressure, pore pressure) and derived parameters such as soil strength, density

Page 9: Jon Machin

CPT – Why?

Subsea oilfield pipes, structures and trenchers need high precision CPT data at the seabed

Page 10: Jon Machin

geoROVTM Track Record of 26 Projects: •  North Sea •  Gulf of Mexico •  SE Asia •  Australia

geoROVTM – Experience

Page 11: Jon Machin

geoREACT – Seabed REACTION

geoROVTM working for BP/Subsea7 with geoREACT suction anchor skid

Page 12: Jon Machin

Case study – developing a seabed drill 2005

Images: Machin

Surface Drill Ship Exploration in 2,000m Water Depth Solwara 1 Site, South Pacific, 2005

Page 13: Jon Machin

Case study – developing a seabed drill 2005

Page 14: Jon Machin

Images: Nautilus, Canyon

Canyon Offshore ROVDrill Mk1 at Solwara 1, 2007

1 Case study – developing a seabed drill 2005

Page 15: Jon Machin

Subsea Drilling – Why?

Canyon’s ROVDrill Mk1, Solwara 1, 2007

Images: Nautilus, Canyon

Page 16: Jon Machin

Why ROVDrill Mk2? Key robotics design decisions required at development stage: •  Installed  power   •  Drill  sizes/diameters  

•  Level  of  automa=on   •  Elevator  cylinder,  chain  drive  or  rack  &  pinion  

•  ROV  Support  Requirements   •  Off-­‐the-­‐shelf  or  proprietary  tooling  

•  Deployment  mechanism  and  weight  limits   •  Tooling  conveyance  by  rod  or  wire-­‐line?  

•  Maximum  water  depth   •  Drill  mud  system  for  hole  stability  

•  Maximim  drilling/tes=ng  depth   •  Adjustable  founda=on  base  

Case study – developing a seabed drill 2005

Page 17: Jon Machin

Global seabed drill rig fleet Subsea Drill Rig

Model

No. of Units

Manufactured Commercially Available?

Max Drill

Depth (m)

Approx. Core/ Sample

Diameter (mm)

CPT Capabilit

y

Tool Conveyance

Mass in Air (Te)

Power/ Support

Requirements

“BMS” 2 Williamson & Associates 1996,

2007

No – JOGMEC Research

25 50mm core (NQ)

No Rod 5 Stand-alone 25HP

“MEBO” 1 Prakla / Schilling, 2003

No – Marum Research

60 64mm core (HQ)

No Wireline 8 Stand-alone 75HP

“Rockdrill2” 1 Atlas Copco / Hydrovision / BGS,

2005

No – BGS Research

15 64mm core (HQ)

No Rod 6 Stand-alone 50HP

“DWACS” 1 Williamson & Associates, 2009

No – NIOT Research

100 85mm core (PQ)

No Wireline 14 Stand-alone 50HP

“Sea Drill” 1 Gregg/ MARL/ Schilling, 2011

Yes – Fugro 150 50-85mm core; sample

Yes, real-time

Wireline 10 Stand-alone 100HP

“PROD1” 1 Benthic Geotech in-house, 1998

Yes – Benthic Geotech

100 44mm core; 44mm sample

Yes, real-time

Rod 11 Stand-alone 100HP

“PROD2” & “PROD3”

2 Benthic Geotech in-house, 2009

Yes – Benthic Geotech

100 72mm core; 75mm sample

Yes, real-time

Rod 14 Stand-alone 130HP

“Rovdrill 3” 1 Perry Slingsby Systems, 2009

Yes - Seafloor Geoservices

90 73mm core; sample

Yes, memory

cone

Wireline 11 150HP ROV hot-stab

“ROVDrill” 2 Perry Slingsby Systems, 2006

Superseded by Mk.2 (Canyon)

20 50mm core (NQ)

No Rod 7 150HP ROV built-in

“ROVDrill Mk.2”

2 Cellula Robotics, 2011

Yes – Canyon Offshore

100 50-72mm core; 55-85mm

sample

Yes, real-time

Rod 12-15 150HP ROV built-in

Page 18: Jon Machin

Global seabed drill rig fleet – Latest News!

Images: Cellula, TI Geosciences

3. TI Geosciences (Royal IHC and Tompkins UK) announce the new IHC SWORD®

2. Fukada Salvage new CRD100 under delivery

1. “Benthic Geotech announce build of new PROD4 at SMD, Newcastle”

Page 19: Jon Machin

Integrated Survey and Exploration

Robotic coring Geophysics - AUV

Technology focus now to improve productivity and reduce costs

Vessel of Oppotunity

Simultaneous Operations Enabled