group 4 program demonstration apr. 21, 2013

20
Page 1 Learning Styles Project Demonstration by Katie O’Neal, Michael Watkins, and Candace Grist EDAC 635

Upload: learningstylesgroupa

Post on 12-Jul-2015

19 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1

Learning Styles Project

Demonstration

by Katie O’Neal, Michael Watkins, and Candace Grist

EDAC 635

Page 2

Introduction

The purpose of this project was to explore the concept of learning styles by reviewing the literature, examining existing programs in which learning styles are applied, and creating a syllabus for a program which adapts learning style features from other programs investigated.

This project was completed in six steps.

Page 3

Step Two:Literature Review

The Six-Step Process

Step Three:Program Investigation

Step Four:Syllabus Design

Step Five:Syllabus Evaluation

Step Six:Project

Demonstration

Step One:Select a Topic

Page 4

Topic Selection

Our group chose the topic “learning styles.” This concept is based on the idea that learners are more motivated to learn and learn more efficiently when they can exercise their preferred learning methods. By examining this concept and understanding how and why people learn the way they do, we could enhance our teaching methods so that the overall learning experience is more enjoyable and successful.

Step One:Select a Topic

Page 5

Literature Reviews

Step Two:Literature Review

A Learning style is defined as the preferred way in which an individual approaches

a task or learning situation (Cassidy, 2004). Several theories have evolved on the

subject, each working to describe the different ways in which an individual learns.

Supporting literature claims that when learning activities accommodate different

learning styles, motivation will increase, causing the overall learning experience to

become more enjoyable, effective, and efficient (Valley, 2011). The concept of

learning styles encompasses written materials, as well as commercial activities.

Commercial activities include measuring devices that are published and sold to

help educators assess individual learning styles and classify learners into different

style categories (Pashler, McDaniel, Rohrer, & Bjork, 2009).

Page 6

Programs we Investigated

• ASCE ExCEED Teaching Workshop

• Carole Buncher & Associates: The Competency Company

• The Council for Adult and Experiential Learning

Step Three:Program Investigation

Page 7

ASCE ExCEED Workshop Communication and Learning Styles

Council for Adult and Experiential Learning

Feature 1 Demonstration classes that model high-quality teaching methods

Mixed-methods structure for discussing and applying different learning style preferences

Vast array of delivery methods including webinars, conferences, live and online classes

Feature 2 Hands-on assessment, preparing and teaching three classes to small groups

Large group and small group discussions

Each training program is unique to the needs of the organization

Feature 3 Identifying participants’ own learning style by taking a learning style assessment

Completing learning style tools to identify and apply personal learning style preferences

Assessment program to identify students needs and learning styles

Feature 4 Seminar provides examples to effectively use the learning styles.

Providing contact information (phone, email, webpage) for questions, comments, or inquiries about workshops

Offers certifications in career advising and prior learning assessment

Adaptable Features Complete a learning style self-assessment; provide useful, hands-on examples to supplement material; survey students post-workshop on unclear areas and most effective points

Implement a mixed-methods structure to discuss and apply learning styles; evaluation after completion of workshop

Delivery methods and information changes depending on needs of the learners; learning style assessments

Main Features from the Programs

Step Three:Program Investigation

Page 8

Syllabus Rationale

Step Four:Syllabus Design

The purpose of the Educational Institute of the American Hotel & Lodging Association Certified Hospitality Educator (CHE) Workshop is to review, discuss, and practice the principles of effective teaching so that participants, who are adult educators working in the field of hospitality, can provide the best learning experience for their hospitality students.

Adaptable features for the Syllabus Design, based on the literature review and program investigations:

•Implementation of a mixed-methods structure to discuss and apply learning styles

•Completion of a learning style self-assessment

•Post-workshop survey to address unclear areas and most effective points

•Evaluation of the program

Page 9

May 22-24, 2013

Johnson & Wales University

Xavier Complex, Room 222

Day 1: 8 am to 5 pm

Day 2: 8 am to 5 pm

Day 3: 8 am to 1 pm (with option of taking the CHE Examination in the afternoon)

COURSE FACILITATOR:

Holly Hospitality - CHE Training Specialist

American Hotel and Lodging Association Educational Institute

2113 North High Street Lansing, Michigan 48906

Phone: 517-372-8800

[email protected]

WORKSHOP DESCRIPTION:• A systematic approach to becoming an effective and confident teacher or industry trainer. It includes

an analysis and application of principles essential to effective hospitality instruction.

TEACHING PHILOSOPHY:• It is our responsibility as workshop presenters to structure an environment in which you can learn. Toward that

end we intend to identify, prepare, and present elements essential to effective teaching. In addition, we will conduct the workshop in an atmosphere of participation and interaction among professions, recognizing and appreciating the experience, observations, and concerns you bring as participants. We are sincerely interested in your growth as teachers and welcome the opportunity to foster that growth.

• As teachers you have a responsibility to your students and the hospitality industry to conduct yourself with the highest academic standards. Therefore, each workshop participant is expected to study workshop materials, complete assignments, and participate actively in activities and discussions. You are encouraged to study with fellow workshop attendees so you can learn from your peers and enhance one another's growth.

Step Four:Syllabus Design

THE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE OF THE AMERICAN HOTEL & LODGING ASSOCIATION

CERTIFIED HOSPITALITY EDUCATOR (CHE) WORKSHOP SYLLABUS

Page 10

WORKSHOP MATERIALS:1. Pre-workshop self-study unit2. CHE notebook.3. Relevant handouts

WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES:The growth and success of students in the classroom are highly dependent on the quality on the instruction they receive. This workshop presents the opportunity to review, discuss, and practice the principles of effective teaching so that you can provide the best learning experience for your students. As a result of completing the CHE Workshop, you should be able to:

1. Design a course syllabus.2. Write complete instruction objectives.3. Distinguish appropriate learning levels for instructional objectives.4. Identify general learning outcomes.5. Establish a positive classroom culture.6. Demonstrate an effective personal presentation style in the classroom.7. Demonstrate the appropriate use of support media.8. Apply appropriate content presentation methods.9. Identify and employ effective classroom communication methods.10. Select appropriate interactive teaching methods for various instructional objectives.11. Employ appropriate methods for ending a class.12. Discuss student, teacher, and course evaluations.13. Complete CHE Workshop exam.14. Create and present a classroom video presentation employing appropriate teaching methods.

WORKSHOP FORMAT:The workshop utilizes a combination of lecture, discussion, and interactive activates. As adult learners, you bring years of experience to the workshop setting. Therefore you are urged to volunteer examples, questions, and comments throughout the workshop.

Step Four:Syllabus Design

Page 11

WORKSHOP REQUIREMENTS:All workshop participants will fulfill these requirements:

1. Participation - Actively participate in all workshop discussions and group activities.2. Assignments - Successfully complete evening assignments.3. Examination - Take the CHE Examination by proctor within two weeks after workshop completion.4. Post-Workshop Video Presentation - prepare and present on digital video a 45 to 60-minute classroom presentation employing the techniques and skills addressed in the CHE workshop.

PARTICIPANT EVALUATION:You will receive Certified Hospitality Educator (CHE) designation upon successfully completing the CHE Program. To complete the program you must:

1. Participate in workshop discussions and complete individualized assignments.2. Pass the CHE Examination (75 percent correct to pass).3. Give a successful Post-Workshop Classroom Video Presentation (75 points out of a possible 100) within six months.

WORKSHOP POLICIES:Because the workshop time is valuable and limited, all session will begin on time. Participants should arrive promptly and attend all workshop sessions.

Step Four:Syllabus Design

Page 12

Step Four:Syllabus Design

WORKSHOP OUTLINE:

DAY ONE

MorningIntroduction to the CHE workshop

Review Pre-Workshop Assignments from Notebook

Understanding Learning Styles•Take a Learning Styles self-assessment•Adapting various learning styles in the classroom

AfternoonWorking with Learning Styles•Small group work based on preferred learning styles. Create a mini-lesson on exceptional customer service using various learning styles.•Presentation of "mini -lessons" using various learning styles

"Muddy Points“•Write questions and concerns for Facilitator to review with participants at the beginning of Day Three

Evening•Assignment - Finalize instructional objective•Assignment - Preview sections 4, 5 and 6 from the Workshop Notebook•Review Day One workshop material for CHE Examination

Page 13

Step Four:Syllabus Design

DAY TWO

MorningReview "Muddy Points"

Establishing Positive Classroom Culture and Communication•Video demonstrating positive classroom cultures•Small group discussion

INTROs and video

Effective Endings

AfternoonContent Presentation Methods•Interactive Teaching Methods

"Muddy Points“•Write questions and concerns for Facilitator to review with participants at the beginning of Day Three

Evening•Assignment - Preview Sections 7 and 8•Review workshop material from Days One and Two.•Assignment - Prepare for your Capstone Presentation.

Page 14

DAY THREE

MorningReview "Muddy Points“

Program Evaluations

Conclusion•Workshop dismissed

Afternoon (Optional)CHE Examination

Step Four:Syllabus Design

Page 15

Evaluation 1Step Five:

Syllabus Evaluation

Syllabus Details

Positive Areas Areas for Improvement

Intro Was clear and easy to follow. The teaching philosophy is well written and gives participants an idea on the purpose of the workshop.

Workshop Format

Good job taking into account that adults are a unique group of learners

Workshop Objectives

Very clear and precise objectives Seems to have a long list of objectives. While all are relevant, maybe consolidating, as the list is somewhat overwhelming

Participant Evaluation

I like that completion of the workshop can lead to a CHE designation

Explain the optional CHE examination, so participants can determine if they are going to take it during the workshop or at a later date

Workshop Requirements

Clearly shows what is expected of the participants

Workshop Outline

Outline was detailed and easy to follow giving you a good idea on what to expect at the workshop

The assignments could use some more explanation. While they are listed under the requirements, it could almost use its own section so participants have a clearer understanding of the at home assignments.

Page 16

Evaluation 2Syllabus Details Positive Areas Areas for Improvement

Intro Provides easy to read basic information

Workshop Format

Workshop Objectives

Very clear, I like how they were listed Somewhat lengthy

Participant Evaluation

Shows what participants will get from the workshop

Workshop Requirements

Shows what is expected of participants. How can you grade/evaluate if someone actively participates in the workshop, this could be a spot for someone to dispute with you

Workshop Outline

-Liked that part of it is based on learning styles- “muddy points” is a good way of gauging the effectiveness of the workshop

- a couple parts could be more clear on what each part is, like is it a video, lecture, discussion, etc

Step Five:Syllabus Evaluation

Page 17

Evaluation 3• What do you like most about the syllabus design?

The course objectives were clearly described and seemed to be attainable through the course completion. It very clearly lays out the description, philosophy, requirements, and policies. There is a daily outline of exactly what will be covered and completed. The course is completed using group work, interactive teaching methods, assignments, lectures, and technology. The workshop begins with assessment test and ends with an evaluation.

• What do you think should be improved? Why?

How? Prerequisites to the course being taken would be good to add. Some sort of grading scale for the students to refer to. Add some sort of office hours for the students to be able to meet with the teacher for additional needs.

Step Five:Syllabus Evaluation

Page 18

Evaluation 4

Professor Gelinas’ evaluation focused primarily on the “polishing” of the syllabus. She provided areas where some minor adjustments to wording and spacing would enhance the syllabus.

On Day Two, the third evening assignment, Professor Gelinas suggested that we use consistent wording throughout the syllabus when discussing the final project. She suggested, “Maybe ‘capstone’ should be used above or not here so the wording is consistent and goes along with objectives and requirements.”

Step Five:Syllabus Evaluation

Page 19

How we would improve our syllabus…

• Include more detailed descriptions of assignments

• Provide more information on CHE exam• Consolidate list of objectives• Adjust wording throughout the syllabus so that

the project name is consistent throughout

Step Five:Syllabus Evaluation

Page 20

References

American Hotel & Lodging Educational Institute. (2010). Certified hospitality educator workshop materials. (pp. 25-30). Lansing, Michigan: American Hotel & Lodging Educational Institute.

Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419-444.

Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2009). Learning styles: Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x

Valley, K. (2011). Learning styles and courseware design. Research in Learning Technology, 5(2). doi: 10.3402/rlt.v5i2.10561