working with humans joe gerstandt shrm 2016

71
#SHRM16 @joegerstandt #SHRM16 @joegerstandt #SHRM16 @joegerstandt #SHRM16 @joegerstandt #SHRM16 @joegerstandt #SHRM16 @joegerstandt #SHRM16 @joegerstandt #SHRM16 @joegerstandt #SHRM16 @joegerstandt #SHRM16 @joegerstandt #SHRM16 @joegerstandt #SHRM16 Working with Humans

Upload: joe-gerstandt

Post on 14-Jan-2017

448 views

Category:

Business


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

#SHRM16

@joegerstandt

#SHRM16

@joegerstandt

#SHRM16

@joegerstandt

#SHRM16

@joegerstandt

#SHRM16

@joegerstandt

#SHRM16

@joegerstandt

#SHRM16

@joegerstandt

#SHRM16

@joegerstandt

#SHRM16

@joegerstandt

#SHRM16

@joegerstandt

#SHRM16

@joegerstandt

#SHRM16

Working with Humans

Page 2: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

[email protected]

linkedin.com/in/joegerstandt

youtube.com/joegerstandt

twitter.com/joegerstandt

slideshare.net/joeg

402.740.7081

Page 3: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Coffee ClubPrice:

• Coffee (with or without milk) 50p

• Tea (with or without milk) 30p

• Milk only (in your own coffee or tea) 10p

• Full cup of milk 30p

Please put your money in the blue tin.

Thanks, Melissa

Melissa Bateson, Newcastle University

Page 4: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Melissa Bateson, Newcastle University

Page 5: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Medical school applicants

interviewed on rainy days received scores equivalent to a 10% lower mark on the MCAT than those

interviewed on sunny days.

Donald Redelmeier, MD and Simon Baxter, BSc, University of Toronto Medical

School, 2009

Page 6: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Adrian North, David Hargreaves, and Jennifer McKendrick, University of Leicester

in the United Kingdom

76.9% 73.3%

Page 7: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Page 8: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Behavioral science builds understanding of how people psychologically react and behaviorally respond to interventions, environments and stimuli.

Page 9: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Behavioral science:

…is a relatively new field.

…insights often run counter to conventional wisdom and common practice.

…can help us challenge misguided interventions or even flaws in the basic set-up of people management.

Page 10: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

To the cubes!

Page 11: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Page 12: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Behavioral economics examines how social and regulatory systems create incentives and constraints, thus shedding light on what influences individual and group behavior.

Page 13: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Cognitive psychology looks at behavior and thought processes and how people respond to stimuli. Here the emphasis is more on individuals than social systems.

Page 14: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Behavioral or social neuroscience looks at brain activity, (fMRI, EEG) and links this to mental processes and tasks. It can illuminate similarities in how we respond to situations and sheds light on how mental processes are prioritized.

Page 15: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

team-building

change

selection & recruitment

employee

engagement

ethics

conflict

learning

&

development

performance

management

pay & reward

Page 16: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Page 17: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Page 18: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

MT

engineers

Page 19: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

MT

management

MT

engineers

Page 20: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

MT

management

MT

engineers

NASA

management

Page 21: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

MT

management

MT

engineers

NASA

management

Page 22: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

MT

management

MT

engineers

NASA

management

Page 23: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Tuesday

morning

January

28th

1986

Page 24: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

MT

management

MT

engineers

NASA

management

Page 25: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

MT

management

NASA

management

Page 26: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

groupthink:

mode of thinking that happens when the desire for harmony in a decision-making group overrides a realistic appraisal of alternatives. Group members try to minimize conflict and reach a consensus decision without critical evaluation of alternative ideas or viewpoints.

Page 27: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

consider

decision

making… 1 - 10

What

makes it

better?

Page 28: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

groupthink

Page 29: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Page 30: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Solomon Asch, 1953

Page 31: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

“…being excluded from a group triggers activity in the same regions of the brain associated with

physical pain.”

Page 32: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Fear of Being Different Stifles

Talent

Harvard Business ReviewMarch 2014

Kenji Yoshino, Christie Smith

Page 33: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Page 34: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

29% altered their attire, grooming or mannerisms to make their identity less obvious

40% refrained from behavior commonly associated with a given identity

57% avoided sticking up for their identity group

18% limited contact with members of a group they belong to

Page 35: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

35

Page 36: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

36

Page 37: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

37

Page 38: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

38

Page 39: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

39

Page 40: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

40

Page 41: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Page 42: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Page 43: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

pygmalion effect

Based on research by Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson, showing that biased expectations

affect reality and create self-fulfilling prophecies as a result.

Page 44: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

confirmation bias

Our tendency to search for or interpret new information in a way that confirms preconceptions and

avoids information and interpretations which contradict

prior beliefs.

Page 45: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

fundamental attribution error

An unjustified tendency to assume that a person’s actions depend on what kind of person that person is

rather than on the social environmental forces influencing

the person.

Page 46: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

good person

Page 47: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

This is a good person.

good person bad person

Page 48: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

This is a good person.

bad person

Page 49: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

It requires no hatred or fear to assign meaning to (or judge) the

things that we see, we do it automatically.

The problem is that we forget, do not realize, or deny that this even

happens.

Page 50: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Page 51: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

What does a

pilot look like?

Page 52: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Page 53: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

amygdala:

processing

and memory of

emotional

reactions,

especially fear

Page 54: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

anterior

cingulate cortex:

autonomic

functions, rational

functions

(decision-making,

empathy, reaction

to reward,

emotion, etc.)

Page 55: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

System

One

Thinking

“Fast

Brain”

Page 56: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

System

One

Thinking

“Fast

Brain”

automatic, incredibly fast, with

little or no effort and no sense

of voluntary control:

• detect that one object is more

distant than another

• orient to the source of a sound

• complete the phrase “bread

and…”

• detect hostility in a voice

• answer 2+2=?

• drive a car on an empty road

• automatic responses

Fast. Efficient.

Not terribly accurate.

Page 57: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Page 58: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

pre-frontal

neocortex:

perceptual

awareness,

thought,

language, and

consciousness

Page 59: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

System

Two

Thinking

“Slow

Brain”

Page 60: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

System

Two

Thinking

“Slow

Brain”

allocates attention to the

effortful mental activities that

demand it…concentration,

effort, intention are involved:

• look for a woman with white

hair

• monitor the appropriateness of

your own behavior

• fill out a tax form

• answer 97+23+19=?

• park in a narrow space

• intentional responses

Slow. Inefficient. Very accurate.

Page 61: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

System

Two

Thinking

“Slow

Brain”

System

One

Thinking

“Fast

Brain”

Page 62: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

stereotype

An idea or image; a mental framework that contains our

knowledge, beliefs, expectations and feelings about a social group.

Stereotypes allow for no individuality.

Page 63: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Page 64: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

smoke

bowl

eat hamburgers

Page 65: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

smoke

bowl

eat hamburgers

knit

wear glasses

eat salad

Page 66: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016
Page 67: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Using data from actual auditions for 8 orchestras over the period when screens were introduced, auditions with screens substantially increased the probability that women were advanced (within the orchestra) and that women were hired. These results parallel those found in many studies of the impact of blind review of journal article submissions.Caffrey, M. (1997, May 12). Blind auditions help women. Princeton Weekly Bulletin. Based on Goldin, C & Rouse, C. (2000). Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. American Economic Review, 90, 715–741.

Page 68: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

1.Clear outcomes.

2.Consider the human experience.

3.Become a student of human behavior.

4.Experiment.

Page 69: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

69

Page 70: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

Predictably Irrational, Dan Ariely

Thinking Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman

Nudge, Thaler & Sunstein

Mistakes Were Made (But Not By Me), Tavris & Aronson

The Social Animal, Elliot Aronson

The Hidden Brain, Shankar Vedantam

Drive, Dan Pink

Switch, Dan and Chip Heath

Page 71: Working with Humans joe gerstandt SHRM 2016

[email protected]

twitter.com/joegerstandt

slideshare.net/joeg

402.740.7081

joegerstandt.com