fight. more. better. joe gerstandt shrm16

60
Fight. More. Better #SHRM2016 @joegerstandt #SHRM2016 @joegerstandt #SHRM2016 @joegerstandt #SHRM2016 @joegerstandt #SHRM2016 @joegerstandt #SHRM2016

Upload: joe-gerstandt

Post on 14-Jan-2017

275 views

Category:

Business


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

Fight. More. Better#SHRM2016@joegerstandt

#SHRM2016@joegerstandt

#SHRM2016@joegerstandt

#SHRM2016@joegerstandt

#SHRM2016@joegerstandt

#SHRM2016

Page 2: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

No thank you.

Page 3: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

[email protected]

linkedin.com/in/joegerstandt

youtube.com/joegerstandt

twitter.com/joegerstandt

slideshare.net/joeg

402.740.7081

Page 4: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16
Page 5: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16
Page 6: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

MT

management

MT

engineers

NASA

management

Page 7: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

Tuesday

morning

January 28th

1986

Page 8: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

MT

management

MT

engineers

NASA

management

Page 9: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

MT

management

NASA

management

Page 10: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

Minority dissent, even dissent that is wrong, stimulates

divergent thought. Issues and problems are considered from more perspectives and group

members find more correct answers.

-Nemeth, Staw (1989) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

Page 11: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

groupthink:

mode of thinking that happens when the desire for harmony in a decision-making group overrides a realistic appraisal of alternatives. Group members try to minimize conflict and reach a consensus decision without critical evaluation of alternative ideas or viewpoints.

Page 12: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

We simply decide without thinking much about the

decision process.-Jim Nightingale

Page 13: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16
Page 14: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

Group vs. Individual Decision Making

groups individuals

accuracy

speed

creativity

degree of

acceptance

efficiency

Page 15: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

Group vs. Individual Decision Making

groups individuals

accuracy x

speed x

creativity x

degree of

acceptancex

efficiency x

Page 16: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

Groups often fail to

outperform individuals

because they prematurely

move to consensus, with

dissenting opinions being

suppressed or dismissed. -Hackman, Morris (1975) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

Page 17: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

Group vs. Individual Decision Making

groups individuals

accuracy x

speed x

creativity x

degree of

acceptancex

efficiency x

Page 18: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

Group intelligence is not

strongly tied to either the

average intelligence of the

members or the team’s

smartest member.-Thomas Malone, MIT Center for Collective Intelligence

Page 19: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

MBA

Harvard University

100 people

Page 20: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

MBA

Harvard University

100 people

team #1

Page 21: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

MBA

Harvard University

100 people

team #1

team #2

Page 22: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

MBA

Harvard University

100 people

team #1

team #2

Page 23: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

MBA

Harvard University

100 people

team #1

team #2

friends

with

diversity

benefits

Page 24: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16
Page 25: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

These theorems that when solving

problems, diversity can trump ability

and that when making predictions,

diversity matters just as much as

ability are not political statements.

They are mathematical truths.-Scott Page

Page 26: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

but…

Page 27: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

team #1

This team greatly

overrates its own

problem solving

capacity.

Page 28: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

team #2

This team greatly

underrates its

problem solving

capacity.

Page 29: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16
Page 30: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

dysfunction

Page 31: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

dysfunctional disagreement

dysfunctional agreement

Page 32: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16
Page 33: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

also

dysfunction

Page 34: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

dysfunctional disagreement

dysfunctional agreement

dysfunctional agreement

Page 35: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

dysfunctional disagreement

dysfunctional agreement

dysfunctional agreement

always

disagree lack of

trust

personal

conflict

us vs.

them

Page 36: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

dysfunctional disagreement

dysfunctional agreement

dysfunctional agreement

always

disagree lack of

trust

personal

conflict

us vs.

them

always

agreelack of

honesty

meeting

after the

meeting

lacking

skills

Page 37: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

dysfunctional disagreement

dysfunctional agreement

dysfunctional agreement

sweet

spot

Page 38: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

1.know your own conflict style

2.clear expectations

3.focus on relationships

Page 39: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

How is the decision going

to be made?

How are we going to

disagree?

Page 40: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

constructive

• focus on issues

• focus on future

• focus on solutions

• inquiry

• lots of “I” and “we”

destructive

• focus on people

• focus on past

• focus on problems

• advocacy

• lots of “you” and

“they”

Page 41: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

agreements…

Page 42: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

agreements…

Put the phones away.

Page 43: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

agreements…

• put phones away

• start on time

• check-in

• serial sharing

• third chair

• boss speaks last

•devils advocate

•reward & coach

•clear divisions

•protect diversity

•end with clarity

•communication

Page 44: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

low courage high courage

low

considerationpassive

aggressive

aggressive

high

considerationpassive assertive

Page 45: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

low courage high courage

low

considerationpassive

aggressive

aggressive

high

considerationpassive assertive

Page 46: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

passive:

• do not assert themselves

• allow others to deliberately or

inadvertently infringe on their rights

• fail to express their feelings, needs,

or opinions

• tend to speak softly or apologetically

• exhibit poor eye contact and slumped

body posture

Page 47: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

aggressive:

• try to dominate others

• use humiliation to control others

• criticize, blame, or attack others

• speak in a loud, overbearing voice

• not listen well

• interrupt frequently

• use “you” statements

Page 48: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

passive-aggressive:

• mutter to themselves rather than confront

the person or issue

• have difficulty acknowledging their anger

• use facial expressions that don't match

how they feel - i.e., smiling when angry

• use sarcasm

• appear cooperative while purposely doing

things to annoy and disrupt

• use subtle sabotage to get even

Page 49: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

assertive:

• state needs, feelings and wants

clearly and respectfully

• use “I” statements

• listen well without interrupting

• have good eye contact

• speak in a calm, clear tone of voice

• have a relaxed body posture

• not allow others to abuse them

Page 50: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

high

difference

low

difference

high

interaction

learning

growth

self-organization

stress

conflict

exhaustion

celebration

reinforcement

energy

low productivity

wasted energy

factions

low

interaction

reflection

safety

clearing the decks

isolation

misunderstanding

frustration

comfort

belonging

rest and recovery

boredom

stagnation

deathDifference Matrix

Glenda Eoyang HSDI

Page 51: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

high

difference

low

difference

high

interaction

learning

growth

self-organization

stress

conflict

exhaustion

celebration

reinforcement

energy

low productivity

wasted energy

factions

low

interaction

reflection

safety

clearing the decks

isolation

misunderstanding

frustration

comfort

belonging

rest and recovery

boredom

stagnation

deathDifference Matrix

Glenda Eoyang HSDI

Page 52: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

high

difference

low

difference

high

interaction

learning

growth

self-organization

stress

conflict

exhaustion

celebration

reinforcement

energy

low productivity

wasted energy

factions

low

interaction

reflection

safety

clearing the decks

isolation

misunderstanding

frustration

comfort

belonging

rest and recovery

boredom

stagnation

deathDifference Matrix

Glenda Eoyang HSDI

Page 53: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

high

difference

low

difference

high

interaction

learning

growth

self-organization

stress

conflict

exhaustion

celebration

reinforcement

energy

low productivity

wasted energy

factions

low

interaction

reflection

safety

clearing the decks

isolation

misunderstanding

frustration

comfort

belonging

rest and recovery

boredom

stagnation

deathDifference Matrix

Glenda Eoyang HSDI

Page 54: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

high

difference

low

difference

high

interaction

learning

growth

self-organization

stress

conflict

exhaustion

celebration

reinforcement

energy

low productivity

wasted energy

factions

low

interaction

reflection

safety

clearing the decks

isolation

misunderstanding

frustration

comfort

belonging

rest and recovery

boredom

stagnation

deathDifference Matrix

Glenda Eoyang HSDI

Page 55: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

high

difference

low

difference

high

interaction

move to low difference:Tell a joke.*

State a shared value or

belief.

Share personal experience.

Pick a low difference topic.

move to low

interaction:Stop communicating.

Leave the area.

Explain yourself.

Pick a low

communication topic.

low

interaction

move to high

interaction:Ask a question.

Use another medium.

Listen more.

Pick a high communication

topic.

move to high

difference:Amplify little

differences.

Play devils advocate.

Pick a high difference

topic.Difference Matrix

Glenda Eoyang HSDI

Page 56: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

Trust

precedes the

truth.

Page 57: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

1.know your own conflict style

2.clear expectations

3.focus on relationships

Page 58: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

8

O

15.99

6

C

12.01

1

H

(1.01)

Page 59: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16
Page 60: Fight. More. Better. joe gerstandt SHRM16

joegerstandt.com

linkedin.com/in/joegerstandt

youtube.com/joegerstandt

[email protected]

twitter.com/joegerstandt

slideshare.net/joeg

402.740.7081

Thank you!