variability of the western iberian buoyant plume to wind events pablo otero 1, manuel...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
Variability of the Western Iberian Buoyant Plume to wind events
Pablo Otero1, Manuel Ruiz-Villarreal1, Álvaro Peliz2 and Jesús Dubert2
1 Instituto Español de OceanografíaMuelle de las Ánimas s/n, 15002, A Coruña (Spain)
2 Departamento de Física, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-194, Aveiro, (Portugal)
2006 ROMS/TOMS European WorkshopAlcalá de Henares (Spain), November 6-8
How to?
Hydrography of the area
Analysis of freshwater discharge
Design of the simulation
Real forcing
Isohaline coordinates
Spatial variability
Front detection
Classification of the WIBP
PREVIOUS KNOWLEDGE
NUMERICAL MODEL
ANALYSIS OF MODEL OUTPUTS
The downwelling season
IPCCoastal Front
River plume
WIBP
IPC
Wind
Freshwater discharge
Climatologic value and scale correction for Nov-Dec 2002.Inter-annual variability (and daily: reservoirs!) is a strong problem
ROMS (Regional Ocean Modelling System, Haidvogel et al., 2002) with nesting capability (Penven et al., 2004).
Three grids with 15Km, 5Km, and 1.8Km
30 vertical s-layers.
OSU tidal inverse model (Egbert and Erofeeva, 2002)
Forcing (MM5: 30Km, 1h).
3 grids… …3 stages
State-of-the-art
Circulation after the Prestige accident (Sea surface salinity from November 19th to 29th)
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
19/11 21/11 23/11 25/11 27/11 29/11 1/12 3/12 5/12 7/12 9/12 11/12 13/12 15/12 17/12 19/12 21/12 23/12
Date
Pa
November-December 2002Silleiro Buoy
MM5
Case 1:Confinement (downwelling)
Case 2:Expansion (relaxation)
Case 3:Expansion (upwelling)
REALISTIC SIMULATION
DO
WN
WEL
LIN
GU
PWEL
LIN
G
Case 1: Confinement (downwelling)
SECTION
Jet
Smoothing
River Douro
River Miño
Upwards Cape Fisterra
20Nov 21Nov 22Nov
Enhanced slope current
Case 2: Expansion (relaxation)
SECTION
Jet
22Nov 23Nov 24Nov
Weakness
Case 3: Expansion (upwelling)
SECTIONMeandering
Northern limit
Detachment
Upwellingof slope current:
Reported on the bottom of Rías Baixas
Wind mixing
Stratification
AVHRR25Nov 3h
ROMS25Nov 3h
Flooding event Climatologic discharge
SW wind overestimated in earlier hours by MM5
Stronger surface signal of IPC
Comparison to observations
SeaWiFS5-7 Dec 2002composite
ROMS6 Dec 2002
AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF RIVER PLUME FRONTS
Potential density
Vertical gradient
Maximum local value
Map of Mixed layer depth
Sobel Edge Filter
Thresholding
Downwelling event
Relaxation of a downwelling event
ISOHALINE COORDINATES
Mixed layer depth
River plume front
Wind mixing Shear mixing
EstuaryOcean
Isohaline coordinatesA coordinate method based in salinity
Consider calculations between salinity classes (isohalines)Why?River plume as a systemTemporal variability can be analysed neglecting spatial variabilityProblems?To delimit the plume, it is necessary toestablish the ocean (‘ambient’) isohaline, and this is not obvious in a realistic study.
Salinity classes
S=0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 35.5 35.6River Ocean
30.05 31.05 32.05 33.05 34.05 35.05322
324
326
328
330
332
334
336
338
340
342
344
346
348
350
352
354
356
SV
log f10
Near field Far field
Salinity classes
Time
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6
6.2
6.4
6.6
6.8
7
7.2
7.4
7.6
7.8
8
-0.3
-0.2
-0.10
0.1
0.2
0.3 19
/11
21/1
123
/11
25/1
127
/11
29/1
11/
123/
125/
127/
129/
1211
/12
13/1
215
/12
17/1
219
/12
21/1
223
/12
Dat
e
Pa
Downwelling Upwelling
Wind stress
Total freshwater volume increases in time
Downwelling winds -> accumulation of freshwater at lower salinity classes
Confinement
Upwelling winds -> displacement of freshwater at higher salinity classes
Expansion and mixing
Freshwater volume between isohalines dV
S
SSSV
upperilower SSSif
0
0
Downwelling Upwelling
hz10 z
SKlog
Near field Far field
Salinity classes
Time
30.05 31.05 32.05 33.05 34.05 35.05322
324
326
328
330
332
334
336
338
340
342
344
346
348
350
352
354
356
-9 .8-9.6-9.4-9.2-9-8.8-8.6-8.4-8.2-8-7.8-7.6-7.4-7.2-7-6.8-6.6-6.4-6.2-6-5.8-5.6-5.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.10
0.1
0.2
0.3 19
/11
21/1
123
/11
25/1
127
/11
29/1
11/
123/
125/
127/
129/
1211
/12
13/1
215
/12
17/1
219
/12
21/1
223
/12
Dat
e
Pa
Wind stress
Vertical salt flux responds immediately to wind changes -> key factor
Vertical salt flux is higher at higher salinity classes
PHYSICAL CLASSIFICATION
Physical parameters
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
19/11 21/11 23/11 25/11 27/11 29/11 1/12 3/12 5/12 7/12 9/12 11/12 13/12 15/12 17/12 19/12 21/12 23/12
Plu
me
dep
th (
m)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Fro
ud
e Nu
mb
er
Plume depthOffshore plume depth Fp
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
19/11 21/11 23/11 25/11 27/11 29/11 1/12 3/12 5/12 7/12 9/12 11/12 13/12 15/12 17/12 19/12 21/12 23/12
Plu
me
wii
dth
(K
m)
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
Slen
dern
ess
Lw
Lw max
Slenderness
FroudeKelvin
SlendernessPlume depth
Mean densityInertial radius
Scaled Ekman transportScaled basal friction
Residence time[…]
Outflow System
Fr K Li (Km)
U (m·s-1)
Discharge (m3·s-1)
h (m)
Lw (Km)
γ
Alaska 0.3 1 24000 0.16 Algerian 0.3 3 0.12 Amazon 0.6 0.6 200000 0.5 Chesapeake Bay 4.2 0.5 500 10 5-20 Columbia 0.6 0.1-0.4 3000-17000 <5 4 Connecticut 0.2 2000 3 1.5
Delaware ~0.1 ~4 0.06 2400
(peak of 5000)
0.2
Eel River* ~1.0 10 0.5-1 4000-12000 0.5-1.3
5-10
Fraser 0.4 10000 3 2 Gaspé 0.4 2.0 0.1 Great Whale 0.2 2 1 Hudson 2.0 500 4 10 Koombana Bay 0.0 2 1 La Grange 0.6 5 5 Lake Michigan ~2 ~0.1 1
Mississippi 1 0.0-0.2
19000 2 0.2 1
Niagara 1 1.0 1 Norwegian 0.1 4.0 0.1 Point Beach 2 0.1 1 Rhine 0.1 3.0 1700 0.2
SAB** 0.3 4.0 0.15-0.2
1000-4000 (peak of 7000)
10-20 0.2
Santa Clara 1.1-1.6
~1.0 10
(peak of 30)
0.2-0.5 100
(peak of 500) ~5 5-10
Scottish 0.1 10 0.2 St. Lawrence 5.0 13400 20 40 WIBP*** 0.2-
0.4 ~4 1-3 0.08 400-2500 4-15 10-
40 0.1-0.2
*results during floods **South Atlantic Bight
ConclusionsVariability of the Western Iberian Buoyant Plume (WIBP) is described with high spatial and temporal resolution (scale of hours) WIBP responds asymmetrically to upwelling and downwelling wind events, with an along-shore circulation during downwelling or steady state and with across-shore circulation during upwelling wind events (south-westwards off the mouth of main rivers).The Iberian Poleward Current (IPC) and the WIBP prove to be a coupled system.Good agreement with the spatial variability shown by satellite imagery. Good response to upwelling events.Isohaline coordinates are a good (although complex) tool to avoid the spatial variability of the plume, helping to understand the involved processes. The plume is characterised: A large-scale river plume, semi-geostrophically balanced (K>>1) and surface-advected (Yankovsky and Chapman, 1987). When compared with other buoyant plume systems, WIBP shares many physical characteristics with the SAB system.
Pablo Otero1, Manuel Ruiz-Villarreal1, Alvaro Peliz2 and Jesús Dubter2
1 Instituto Español de OceanografíaMuelle de las Ánimas s/n, 15002, A Coruña (Spain)
2 Departamento de Física, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-194, Aveiro, (Portugal)
30.05 31.05 32.05 33.05 34.05 35.05322
324
326
328
330
332
334
336
338
340
342
344
346
348
350
352
354
356
-0.3
-0.2
-0.10
0.1
0.2
0.3 19
/11
21/1
123
/11
25/1
127
/11
29/1
11/
123/
125/
127/
129/
1211
/12
13/1
215
/12
17/1
219
/12
21/1
223
/12
Dat
e
Pa
Downwelling Upwelling
SA
Wind stress
Near field Far field
Salinity classes
Time
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
950
1000
Area increases in timeby increasing of river discharge
Northerly winds -> area increases at high salinity classes
Expansion
Cooling of the WIBP (1)
14.2
14.4
14.6
14.8
15
15.2
15.4
15.6
15.8
16
16.2
16.4
16.6
16.8
17
17.2
-9.9 -9.8 -9.7 -9.6 -9.5 -9.4 -9.3 -9.2 -9.1 -9
Longitude
323
325
327
329
331
333
335
337
339
341
343
345
347
349
351
353
355
Day
-9.8 -9.6 -9.4 -9.2 -9
Longitude
323
325
327
329
331
333
335
337
339
341
343
345
347
349
351
353
355
-0.14
-0.10
-0.06
-0.02
0.02
0.06
0.10
0.14
0.18
0.22
0.26
Section 42N
Oil spill from Nov 19 06:00hCurrents + Wind stress (3%)
Coastal circulation before stranding of 2nd spill
River plumes
NorthWest Iberia is an important fishery and aquaculture area.
Strong variability in HABs and fish larvae are been reported. An answer beyond biological behaviour is required.
River plumes can play a role in enrichment, concentration and/or retention of biological material (factors pointed by Bakun, 1996)
Dispersion is enhanced in the frontal area.