the (new) international neuroblastoma response criteria (inrc) · the international neuroblastoma...

23
The International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC): what is new [email protected]

Upload: dinhtuong

Post on 09-Aug-2019

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC): what is

new

[email protected]

Disclosures

Springer royaltiesConsultant for Bayer

Neuroblastoma

Clinical Trials Planning Meeting

Washington, April 12-13, 2012

Neuroblastoma CTPM

• Co-Chairs: Rochelle Bagatell, Katherine Matthay, Julie Park, Dominique Valtuea-Couanet

• Executive Planning Committee: Penelope Brock, Frank Berthold, Susan Cohn, Wendy London, Andrew Pearson, Liz Scott, Nita Seibel, Wolf Lindwasser

• Date: April 12 – 13, 2012

Working Groups

• Primary Site: Kieran McHugh, Jed Nuchtern

• Metastatic Imaging: Ariane Boubacker, Kate Matthay

• Bone Marrow: Frank Berthold, Susan Burchill

• Ultra High Risk: John Maris, Gudrun Schleiermacher

• Phase 2: Julie Park, Dominique Valteau-Couanet

• expertise in oncology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiology, surgery, biology and statistics (n=52)

Radiology 2011; 261: 243-257

INSS & INRG

INSS

• Stage I

• Stage II

• Stage III, crossing midline

• Stage IV

• Stage 4S

INRG

• L1 (non-invasive)

• L2 (infiltrative)

• Stage M

• Stage MS (age to 18 months)

MRI at diagnosis and routine FU

• No radiation

• Intraspinal

• Lymphadenopathy

• Marrow

• Chest wall

• Liver

• IDRFs

Pre-surgery, CT better?CT (13 days later) – clear encasement of aorta

Pre-operative CT scan for Abdominal Neuroblastomas is Superior to MRI

for Safe Surgical Planning

SIOP Congress Kyoto 2018

K Burnand, G Barone, K McHugh, K Cross

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London

Brodeur et al, JCO 1993

International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC)

developed to permit comparison of clinical trial results worldwide

‘new’ INRC

Primary disease

• RECIST 1.1

• unidimensional measurement

• MRI or CT

Metastatic disease?

• MIBG, scoring systems

• FDG PET-CT if primary MIBG non-avid

• Bone marrow aspirates and trephines

• WBMRI?

12 anatomical segments

Extension score…..

SIOPEN method

The Curie scoring method

mIBG scoring

0 = no mIBG involvement

1 = 1 mIBG avid lesion

2 = > 1 mIBG avid lesion

3 = abnormal mIBG uptake in > 50% segment

prognostic significance of the Curie Score (CS) validated. Post-induction CS>2 inferior outcome

PET-CT

INRC summary

• urinary catecholamine levels no longer recommended

• 4 samples - to assess bone marrow involvement (aspirates & trephines)

• % marrow infiltration calculated at all sample sites

• highest % tumour infiltration is used to assess response

• new category ‘minimal disease’ (0-5%)

Overall response

Response Definition

Complete Response (CR) CR at all involved sites

Partial Response (PR) PR in at least one site, with CR, PR, MD* (in bone marrow) at all

other sites. No progressive disease at any site.

Minor Response (MR) PR or CR in at least one site with SD at one or more sites. No

progressive disease.

Stable Disease (SD) SD in one site. No better than SD at any other site. No progressive

disease.

Progressive disease (PD) Progressive disease at any site.

MD* - minimal disease

The left one is the patient!

with permission of the parents

One of these twin girls was registered in

the HRNBL1 in 2005!

Conclusions

• primary & soft tissue masses – RECIST 1.1

• functional imaging (MIBG or PET-CT)

• applicable to relapsed & refractory disease (phase I and II)