regional office for africa, montreal protocol compliance assistance programme

Un

ited

Nat

ion

s E

nvi

ron

men

t P

rogr

amm

e

Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

Readiness of A5 Countries for MB Phase-out by 1st Jan 2015:

Addressing the challenges of sustainability

Webinar on Methyl Bromide

7th May, 2013

Email: Florence.Asher @unep.org

Un

ited

Nat

ion

s E

nvi

ron

men

t P

rogr

amm

e


Year Non-Article 5 countries Article 5 countries

1991 Consumption/ productionbaseline

-

1995 Freeze -

1995-98 average

- Consumption/ productionBaseline

1999 25% reduction -

2001 50% reduction

2002 - Freeze

2003 70% reduction Review of reductions

2005 Phase-out with provision forCUEs

20% reduction

2015 Phase-out with provision forCUEs

Methyl Bromide Phase-Out Schedule as agreed by Parties in 1997

Critical and emergency uses may be permitted after phase-out if they meet agreed criteria. Quarantine and pre-shipment (QPS) uses and feedstock are exempt from reductions and

phase-out

Un

ited

Nat

ion

s E

nvi

ron

men

t P

rogr

amm

e


Four Main Categories of MB uses under the Montreal Protocol

MB Uses Status under the Montreal Protocol

Non-QPS fumigant uses(Soil, Post Harvest, Structures)

Subject to production and consumption phaseout schedules of Articles 2 and 5, trade and licensing controls of Article 4, and data reporting requirements of Article 7. Critical Use Exemptions can be authorised by the MOP for specific uses that meet the criteria in Decision IX/6 and other relevant decisions

QPS fumigant uses Exempted from reduction and phase-out schedules. Subject to Article 7 data reporting requirements

Laboratory and analyticaluses

Subject to production and consumption phaseout schedules of Articles 2 and 5 except for the specific Critical Use Exemptions under Decision XVIII/15. Subject to data reporting under Annex II of the Sixth Meeting of the Parties

Feedstock used in themanufacture of otherchemicals

Exempted from phase-out schedule underArticle 1. Subject to Article 7 data reportingrequirements

Un

ited

Nat

ion

s E

nvi

ron

men

t P

rogr

amm

e


Global Context

• Methyl Bromide Phase-out schedule for developing countries is 1st January 2015;

• Several countries have accelerated their methyl bromide phase-out ahead of the deadline;

• Methyl bromide is the only sector where the reversibility of ODS use is possible and nearly effortless.;

• Compared to the industrial sector, their sustainability is less guaranteed;

• Unlike CFCs and halons, methyl bromide production facilities will not close down; they will continue for Critical Use

Exemptions and Quarantine and Pre-Shipment (QPS); &

• Production and imports for QPS use could easily be diverted to non-QPS uses.

Un

ited

Nat

ion

s E

nvi

ron

men

t P

rogr

amm

e


MB Consumption trends in Article 5 countries 1991–2011

Year

Un

ited

Nat

ion

s E

nvi

ron

men

t P

rogr

amm

e


Baselines and trends in MB consumption in Non-A 5 and A 5 regions, 1990 – 2011 (ODP tonnes)

Year

Un

ited

Nat

ion

s E

nvi

ron

men

t P

rogr

amm

e


MB QPS trends in Article 5 countries 1991–2011

Year

Un

ited

Nat

ion

s E

nvi

ron

men

t P

rogr

amm

e


MB QPS trends in Non-A 5 and A 5 regions, 1990 – 2011 (ODP tonnes)

Year

Un

ited

Nat

ion

s E

nvi

ron

men

t P

rogr

amm

e


Key issues

1. Technical Sustainability Issues of Alternative Technologies

Alternative technologies/chemicals including issues related to efficacy of alternatives, pest resistance to the alternatives, emerging new pests, cost of alternatives, commercial availability of alternatives in smaller countries, bans on certain chemical alternatives, difficulty in the registration of new chemicals, unsuitable infrastructure for some alternatives such as phosphine, and lack of cost effective alternatives for high moisture fresh dates.

Training needs including issues related to emergence of new farmers since the completion of MB projects, lack of knowledge and capacity on application of new chemicals and new technologies, especially for countries that did not report use of MB , lack of knowledge in making on-farm alternative materials, lack of networking on sourcing of alternative materials, and lack of ongoing awareness programs. There is also need for capacity building of Customs Officers on MB

Experts/expertise and technology to monitor the development of pest resistance. Lack of appropriate experts to carry out monitoring activities and to collaborate with partners. These experts/ expertise are very scarce.

Un

ited

Nat

ion

s E

nvi

ron

men

t P

rogr

amm

e


Key issues contd.

2. Technical Assistance Issues

Awareness raising - Continuous Awareness raising, access of new developments for old and new market players and building confidence in acceptance of new technologies, raising awareness on risk of reversibility to MB uses and encouraging policy and/or awareness measures to avoid it happening.

Training Programs - Development and maintenance of a sustainable practical training program and coordinated efforts to transfer the alternative technologies. Training of Ozone Officers on available alternatives to QPS uses and alternatives for treating wood pallets (ISPM-15).

Documentation - Development and updating of technical manuals, toolkits, etc on new technologies.

Technology Transfer Programs -Lack of Exchange Programms/ study tour to countries with advanced technologies for information exchange, materials, varieties, rootstocks etc

Guidance and assistance to Ozone Officers on MB reporting requirements, Clarification on Procedures for application of Critical Uses Nominations and QPS application of methyl bromide (MOP Dec XXIII/5), and handling of identified unwanted MB cylinders as well as waste by-products materials from MB alternatives

Un

ited

Nat

ion

s E

nvi

ron

men

t P

rogr

amm

e


Key issues contd.

3. Regulatory and Institutional Issues

Continued availability of MB because of continued production of MB for exempted QPS uses: Production and imports for QPS use could easily be diverted to non-QPS, risk of illegal markets for MB, increased demand of MB for QPS in some countries. Reversibility of MB use is quite possible and nearly effortless. Compared to the industrial sectors, the sustainability of the MB phase out is less guaranteed by changing the equipment used but rather depends on the availability of cost-effective technically, economically and commercially (TEC) feasible alternatives, since there is no single replacement. Such alternatives have not yet reached all countries and all regions.

Lack of proper tracking systems and institutional coordination (NOUs and Agricultural Ministries) for efficient licensing and control of illegal trade

National regulatory restrictions that limit uses of the alternatives, and lack of incentives to adopt clean technologies

Lack of market-access pressure as driving forces of good agricultural practices

Lack of Partners for co- funding

Un

ited

Nat

ion

s E

nvi

ron

men

t P

rogr

amm

e


Highlights of CAP’s response to the challenges

Trainings on alternative technologies, Information dissemination, Documentations, etc

Un

ited

Nat

ion

s E

nvi

ron

men

t P

rogr

amm

e


regional office for africa, montreal protocol compliance assistance programme

Documents