8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

1/33

2009

Princeton Environmental Group57 Goffle Road

Hawthorne, NJ 07506T: (718) 767-7271F: (718) 767-7187

www.princetonenvironmental.co

Princeton Environmental Group, INC.

Scope of Work

For

MSWE Permit Design Services

2010

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

2/33

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 1: Introduction

SECTION 2: General Conditions

SECTION 3: PEG Responsibilities & Scope of Work

SECTION 4: Statement of Qualifications

SECTION 5: Technical Scope of Work

SECTION 6: Fee Proposal

EXHIBIT A :

EXHIBIT B:

Proposed Agreement Template

Schedules and Earned Value Milestones

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

3/33

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background:The City of Cleveland Department of Public Service operates the Division of WasteCollection and Disposal (DWC). This Division provides weekly collection of waste from155,000 Cleveland homes, the West Side Market, Fire and Police Stations, the JusticeCenter, City Hall and other City Buildings and public areas. The Division of WasteCollection operates a municipal solid waste transfer station at 3727 Ridge Road,Cleveland, Ohio 44144. Municipal solid waste is brought to the transfer station viawaste collection vehicles. The waste is gathered and loaded into transport trucks to betaken to landfills.

The Citys Department of Public Utilities operates the Division of ClevelandPublic Power (CPP) for the purpose of supplying electric energy to customerslocated primarily in the City of Cleveland. In order to meet the goals of reducingClevelands dependency on electric power purchase and the electric transmissiongrid, CPP seeks to assess the feasibility of a Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)Facility (the Facility) converting city waste to electrical power (MSWE) plantwith-in the city boundary.

Proposed Facility:The proposed MSWE Facility will utilize advanced and proven technologiesincluding and not limited to gasification, steam compression obtained throughPrinceton Environmental Group (PEG), Inc., and Kinsei Sangyo Company.The Facility would process MSW, from both the City of Cleveland as well as thesurrounding communities, to generate electrical energy as well as a number ofadditional marketable by-products such as recyclables, refuse derived fuel (RDF)pellets, steam and decorative bricks.

The Facility would process the MSW and recyclables in a Seven (7) step process

identified as: (1) Collection; (2) MSW Handling and Processing; (3) Recycling;

(4) Sorting and Shredding; (5) Steam Compression; (6) Gasification and (7)

Electric Generation. This would enable the City of Cleveland to produce electric

power locally, utilize MSW as a fuel source and also assist CPP in meetinganticipated state and local Advanced Energy Portfolio Standards (AEPS).

Facility Location:The facility will be located at the Citys Ridge Road Transfer Station, at 3727Ridge Road, Cleveland, OH, 44114. The Transfer Station operates on 10.6 acresof industrial land and municipal waste throughout the City of Cleveland iscollected here then transferred on to landfills. In addition to the operational area,the City of Cleveland owns adjacent property to the west (occupied by the City ofCleveland Service Department) and to the south. The total acreage of City-ownedproperty, including the Ridge Road Transfer Station but not the adjacent police

shooting range, is approximately 20 acres. If the MSWE facility requires morespace, the possibility of acquisition of surrounding land should be evaluated.

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

4/33

GLOSSARYOFTERMS

BOD Basis of Design

CSI Construction Specifications Institute

CO Change Order

COR Change Order Request

CPP Cleveland Public PowerCSB Cleveland Small BusinessDWC Division of Waste Collection and Disposal

DPU Department of Public Utilities

PEG Princeton Environmental Group

EAC Estimate at Completion

EEO Equal Employment Opportunity

ETC Estimate to Completion

EV Earned ValueEVM Earned Value MilestoneFAT Factory Acceptance TestHMI Human Machine InterfaceHVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning

I/O Input / OutputNFPA National Fire Protection AssociationNOA Notice of AwardNTP Notice to ProceedOD Operational Demonstration

ODC Other Direct Cost (reimbursable)

OEPA Ohio Environmental Protection AgencyOEO Mayors Office of Equal Opportunity

O&M Operations and Maintenance

MSP Microsoft Project

PCCS Plant Computer Control System

DM Design Memorandum

DR Design Report

PDR Project Definition Report

PEP Plant Enhancement Program

PERRP Public Employer Risk Reduction Program

PLC Programmable Logic Controller

PMC Program Management Consultant

RE Resident Engineer

RI Resident Inspector

RFQ Request for Qualifications

RFI Request for Information

SOWR Statement of Work Request

RPR Resident Project RepresentativeSOW Statement of Work SD Systems DesignUSEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

5/33

SECTION 2

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1.0 Project Staff:

1.1 Staffing the project will be the responsibility of the PrincetonEnvironmental Group (PEG) and shall start immediately upon receivingNotice to Proceed (NTP) from DPU.

1.2 PEG shall maintain continuity with regard to management and staffsassigned to this project throughout the duration of this Project and shallretain full right with regard to the management and technical staffassigned to the Project. PEG will have the right to make any changes inthe Project Managers and key staffs, including Subconsultant personnel

assigned to the project as long as it is in the best interest of the project.PEG will submit to the DPUs Project Manager (PM) in writing of allproposed change.

1.3 Should PEG change its Project Management and key staff, includingSubconsultant personnel at any time during the project, DPU shall reservethe right to withhold compensation if DPU reasonably determines suchchange(s) will materially affects PEGs ability to successfully perform anddeliver contracted task(s).

2.0 Local Office:

2.1 PEG will maintain an adequately staffed and sufficiently equipped localoffice as specified elsewhere in the SOWR

2.2 PEGs Project Manager(s) and/or key staff will be available to meet withDPU as reasonably required.

3.0 Minority Business Enterprise (MBE), Female Business Enterprise (FBE) andCleveland Small Business (CSB):

3.1 The City of Cleveland has established goals for CSB participation for each

DESIGN CONTRACT of 10% of the proposed GRAND TOTAL fee. TheCSB participation levels proposed by PEG that exceed the goals are highlyencouraged. Correct completion of OEO forms, Schedules 1 through 6(see ATTACHMENT D, City Forms) cannot be overemphasized. ALLschedules must will be filled out completely, signed, and returned by PEG.Schedules determined to be not applicable to PEGs proposal shall bemarked N/A, signed, and included in the proposal.

3.2 PEG shall make every effort possible to distribute to its CSBSubconsultants any additional scope of work and associated fee whichmay be authorized by DPU. Distribution to CSB Subconsultants should be

consistent with contractual obligations and commitments. CSBparticipation percentages shall be maintained or exceeded throughout the

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

6/33

project.

3.3 A list of certified CSB Subconsultants is available from the Office ofEqual Opportunity, City Hall, Room No. 335, City of Cleveland; 601Lakeside Ave.; Cleveland; OH. 44114. Contact person is Ms. Karen

Cummings at (216) 664-3154. PEG will be responsible for obtaining themost current list and for contacting potential MBE/FBE Subconsultants.The City shall assume no responsibility for matching Prime Consultantswith qualified MBE/FBE Subconsultants.

3.4 OEO forms and information are available through the web at the followingsite: http://www.city.cleveland.oh.us/business_center/forms/business_forms.asp.

4.0 Compensation:

4.1 Actual compensation amount shall be determined as defined in

ATTACHMENT A, Sample Agreement, and as determined duringcontract negotiation. Compensation shall be based on a Fixed Pricedefined by PEG as proposed in the Fee Proposal.

4.2 The contract shall be defined in terms of Six (6) Primary Tasks:

4.2.1 Task 1 Project Start up

4.2.2 Task 2 Basis of Design (BOD)

4.2.3 Task 3 Design Memorandum (DM)

4.2.4 Task 4 Design Report (DR)

4.2.5 Task 5 Permitting

4.2.6 Task 6 Close-Out

4.3 Tasks are defined in detail in SECTION 3, PEG Responsibilities andScope of Work and are assigned a Fixed Fee. The Fixed Fee shall be basedon the proposed fee and formalized at the time of contract execution.

4.4 With-in Sixty (60) days from the contract execution, PEG shall submitthe following:

4.4.1 Complete Staffing Profile by Task. This information will beincluded as part of the PEG first invoice to DPU.

4.4.2 Complete Project Team Personnel and job classification: This listmust include Subconsultants personnel. This information will beincluded as part of the PEG first invoice to DPU.

4.5 Attached to this proposed SOW by PEG, PEG has submitted its Cost-loaded schedule and Earned Value Milestone (EVM) definitions thatdefine in discrete terms the deliverable to be provided, the schedule forsubmittal, and the amount of fee to be earned upon submittal. (See

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

7/33

Exhibit B)

4.5.1 EVMs define the Subtask level of the project. EVMs shall be

applied for Tasks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

4.5.3 Sample EVMs are provided in ATTACHMENT B, ReferenceInformation. PEG is responsible for reviewing/revising the SampleEVMs to ensure project scope is met.

4.5.4 PEG may be required to revise or add new EVMs throughout theproject as directed by DPU. Any new EVMs are not listed in thePEG proposed Milestones (Exhibit B) will be considered asOptional TASKs which shall be governed by SECTION 3 of thisSOW.

4.5.6 PEG shall NOT receive credit for Earned Value of any of the listedPrimary Task until all of the identified deliverables/submittalsdefined by the EVM of said Task are reasonably accepted by DPU.

4.6 Potential Optional Tasks are defined in SECTION 3, PrincetonEnvironmental Group Responsibilities. DPU may elect to delete,substitute, reduce, or redefine these Optional Tasks as needed. The fee forOptional Tasks has not been predefined and shall not affect the costcompetitiveness of the proposal. If DPU chooses to exercise an OptionalTask, the staff hours and fee shall be negotiated with PEG on a fixed price

basis.

4.7 In this Agreement, PEG has option not to take on any additional Task(s) ifPEG feel by taking on additional task(s) may jeopardize its ability tocomplete this Agreement as required.

5.0 Contract Agreement:

PEG has put forth its proposed Sample Agreement to CPP as part of this SOW.(See Exhibit A)

6.0 Miscellaneous Information:

6.1 The City intends to issue a NTP once a contract has been fully executed byboth parties.

6.2 PEG agrees, by responding to this SOWR that the City is not liable for anycosts incurred by PEG in the preparation of its SOW, or the SOWpresentation, or during its contract negotiations with the DPU.

6.3 PEG agrees that the City is not liable for any costs incurred beforereceiving Notice to Proceed, and that PEG shall at no time bill for anysuch costs.

6.4 DPU reserves the right to award this contract excluding any Task,

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

8/33

Reimbursable expense, or any or all Optional Tasks.

6.5 Subcontracts for CSB firms shall be submitted to OEO for review prior toDPU issuing NTP. Failure to submit CSB subcontracts in a timely mannerwill delay Notice to Proceed.

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

9/33

SECTION 3

PEG RESPONSIBILITIES AND SCOPE OF WORK

1.0 General Responsibilities

1.1. PEG shall assume full responsibility for itself and its Subconsultants. PEGis responsible for meeting the scope of services as described in thisdocument.

1.2. PEG shall communicate in all instances on behalf of its Subconsultants.PEG shall not pass-through communications, questions, issues,performance problems, etc. between DPU and the Subconsultants.

1.3. PEG shall manage its own personnel and those of its Subconsultants with

the common goal of fulfilling the needs of DPU and the requirements ofthe contract.

1.4. PEG shall resolve issues internal to its team in the best interest of theproject.

1.5. PEG is responsible for conducting technical evaluations of issues andalternatives and for presenting its evaluation and recommendations inTechnical Memoranda (TM) throughout the project. TMs should includea discussion of life-cycle costs (capital and operations and maintenance).PEG should not ask for direction but rather present evaluations in

sufficient detail along with recommendations that represent the mosttechnically and fiscally desirable solution.

1.6. TMs shall be developed as appropriate however several specific TMs havebeen pre-identified as Task 1 deliverables.

1.7. PEG shall provide adequate staff, both technical and administrative, tofulfill the requirements of its contract and to produce the requireddeliverables per the defined schedule. Personnel with demonstratedknowledge and experience in defined scope of services shall be assignedthroughout design, permitting and closeout.

1.8. PEGs Engineer of Record for Ohio regulatory agency filing; and permitdesign Air permitting and for the systems/process engineering designwork scope of this SOW shall be Licensed Professional Engineers in theState of Ohio.

1.9. The Project Manager shall be knowledgeable about and responsible forexecution of the contract from start to finish. The Project Manager shallhave the authorization to assign resources and make decisions on behalf ofPEG. Project Manager shall have adequate years of related experiencemanaging projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to this project.

The Project Manager is responsible for all project deliverables throughoutthe entire project. The Project Manager shall coordinate the efforts of the

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

10/33

Team in all Tasks.

1.10. The work scope identified in this section and throughout the SOWR is notintended to be all encompassing, specific statements of the engineeringrequirements for PEG. For this reason, PEG is responsible, as part of its

design efforts, if PEG feels they are relevant and important to the designof this facility, to provide engineering development, evaluation, designand related services to review, modify as required, and implement theintention of the work scope identified. This includes all relevantengineering disciplines and the work products directly related to thefacility design developed by these disciplines, whether identified or not,which are required to design the systems and processes discussed in thisSOWR.

1.11. The recommended modifications of designs identified in this SOWR maybe based on technology known at the time of development. Therefore,

PEG shall provide alternatives to the recommended design in its SOW, if,in the opinion of PEG, the alternative will result in a higher quality, morecost effective or operationally superior facility.

1.12. PEG agrees that variations in the final design direction from the SOW willnot justify additional fees. PEGs contract fee shall not be increased ormodified if alternatives are recommended and/or accepted by DPU.

1.13 PEG shall ensure that delivery of the Kinsei gasification equipment shallbe made within twenty-four (24) months after ordering of the equipmentat mutually agreed terms and conditions.

1.14 PEG shall submit a Pro Forma and Financial Projections to the DPUwithin twelve (12) months from the signing of this agreement.

2.0 Meetings

2.1. Meetings are an integral part of the project and are used forcommunication, presentation, and discussion of the many aspects of design,implementation, and coordination. PEGs fee for attending and preparingfor meetings throughout the life of the project, whether planned orunplanned, shall be included in PEGs proposed fee.

2.2. PEGs Project Manager shall attend as minimum, monthly meetings tothoroughly present and review project issues throughout the course of theproject. The meeting agenda shall be developed and issued by PEG at leastthree working days in advance of the progress meetings. PEG support staffattendance should be minimized, as it is expected that PEGs PM shall beable to sufficiently present and discuss project status and issues.

2.3. Attendance at meetings by other design team members (Subconsultants,discipline engineers, etc.) to discuss topics or issues is considered to be atypical design activity and shall not be considered for additionalcompensation.

2.4. PEG shall provide to all meeting attendees design documents, preliminary

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

11/33

design facilities drawings, product literature, technical memoranda, or othermaterial so as to provide thorough background and documentation of theissues.

2.5. PEG shall draft and distribute meeting minutes for all meetings in a format

approved by the DPU PROJECT MANAGER. The meeting minutes shallbe submitted to DPU in electronic (MS Word and PDF) format within three(3) working days of the meeting.

2.6. PEG shall draft and maintain current, and distribute a meeting action itemlist. The action item list shall be a cumulative record of items that arebeing addressed. A template will be provided to PEG upon request.

2.7. PEG shall prepare for and participate in Submittal Preview meetings andthe submittal review process for each of the following submittals: Basis ofDesign (BOD) Presentation and Initial Design Memorandum (DM),

Design Report (DR) and Individual Permit Applications listed as PEGsresponsibility.

2.8. Submittal Preview meetings provide a forum for PEG to present anoverview of its submittal to DPU staff. The overview shall be a formalpresentation which includes, but is not limited to: a description of theSubmittals content, summary of changes since the previous submittal, andissues/questions which may require resolution. Use of PowerPoint for theformal presentation is recommended.

2.9. Additional submittal meetings may be held as necessary at DPUs

discretion.

2.10. Each preliminary design submittal shall be reviewed by DPU and/or itsdesignee. PEG discipline-specific personnel shall be available during thereview period to meet with reviewers as necessary to review and discussdesign issues.

2.11. The submittal review process shall provide a forum for presentation ofDPU comments.

2.12. PEG shall prepare for and participate in specialty design meetings asneeded throughout the design. Meetings may include, but are not limited toall technical, process and permitting components of the design.

2.13. PEG shall prepare for and participate in coordination meetings with otherDesign Professionals or others as requested by DPU.

2.14. PEG shall prepare for and participate in meetings with agencies andcommittees, including but not limited to the United States and OhioEnvironmental Protection Agencies, Landmarks Commission, PlanningCommission, and other City and State organizations. All correspondencewith such organizations shall be submitted to DPU for review and approvalprior to transmittal to the organization.

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

12/33

3.0 Project Schedule

3.1. PEG shall develop and maintain a project schedule in the latest version ofMicrosoft Project. The primary schedule calendar shall be Monday throughFriday, 8 hours per day.

3.2. Should at any time during the Project, DPU determine that PEGs progressis unsatisfactory towards meeting project goals (i.e. EVMs or ProjectMilestones), DPU may require PEG to submit a detailed recovery scheduleand narrative description at no additional cost to the City. The recoveryschedule shall address PEG actions required to meet project terms andconditions (i.e. EVM dates) which may be determined to be in jeopardy.

4.0 Invoicing and Reporting

4.1. PEG shall submit to DPU its invoices for progress payments as stated in the

Fee agreement based on the Fixed Price payment schedule.

4.2. PEG shall submit one (1) original and two (2) copies of the invoice.

4.3. The Monthly Report shall include, but not be limited to a brief narrativedescription of the project, activities and accomplishments for the reportedmonth, planned activities for the next month, identification of scheduleconcerns and variances, summary of budget status and variances, and keyissues.

4.4. The Monthly Report shall include an updated schedule. Schedule progress

shall be reported as TASK PERCENT COMPLETE. A PDF view of theschedule shall also be included as part of the monthly report.

4.5. A sample format of the invoice tables and monthly report will be providedto PEG upon request.

5.0 General Submittal Requirements

5.1. Unless directed otherwise, PEG shall provide ten (10) complete papercopies and one (1) electronic copy of each submittal. PEG shall not berequired to confirm with DPU the number of copies required PRIOR toeach submittal.

5.2. Paper copies may include, but are not limited to, Basis of Design (BOD),Design Memorandum (DM), Design Report (DR), PermittingApplications, full size (22x34) and half-size (11x17) drawings,specifications, Technical Memoranda, Issues Resolution Matrix,presentations, and any supporting/reference documents and appendices asdirected by DPU.

5.3. Electronic copies shall be submitted on CD-ROM and shall include allfiles in original electronic format (Word, Excel, AutoCAD, etc) and theentire submittal, including all appendices and attachments, etc. in AdobePDF format (with bookmarks).

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

13/33

5.4. PEG shall make every effort possible to deliver submittals at least three(3) working days prior to its scheduled Preview Meeting.

5.5. PEG shall allow ten (10) working days following the Preview Meeting ordate that DPU receives the submittal, whichever is later, for return of DPU

comments on the submittal.

5.6. PEG shall make every effort possible to resolve issues/action items withinten (10) working days from date issue are identified. The Action Item Listshall be discussed at each bi-weekly progress meeting and shall beincluded with each meeting agenda and minutes.

5.7. PEG shall incorporate resolved issues/comments into next submittal orsubmittal may be returned and considered incomplete and late.

5.8. PEG shall draft an Issues Resolution Matrix with each design submittal

which identifies critical project issues that require DPU input. PEG shallmaintain a list of items to be deferred to future projects, action items list,changes needed or made to Master Specifications, and changes to DPUEngineering Standards. Templates for these items will be provided toPEG.

6.0 Task 1 Project Start Up

6.1. PEG shall open an office in the City of Cleveland or in Cuyahoga Countyfor this Project within Sixty (60) days of the signing of the Agreement.

6.2. Above said office shall be adequately staffed and furnished Mondaythru Friday between 9AM to 5PM with exception of national holidays.

6.3. Evidence of this office and other required information listed elsewhere inthis SOW must be submitted to CPP together with the 1st invoice by PEGto DPU..

7.0 Task 2 Basis of Design (BOD)

7.1. PEG shall not proceed with Basis of Design without written Notice toProceed.

7.2. Industry Creation: The Basis of Design work includes a BusinessDevelopment component. A deliverable for this portion of the BOD workshall be submitted to DPU under separate cover as described below.

7.2.1. As a function of DPU, City of Cleveland awarding to PEG theSystem Design (SD) which shall lead to construction of PEGdesigned MSWE Plant, PEG as Project Manager shall assist theCity in its efforts to attract advanced energy technologymanufacturers and suppliers to Cleveland.

7.2.2. PEG shall assist the City in planning advance energy technologypresentations of such manufactures that PEG designates may beinterested in locating operations of any type in Cleveland,

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

14/33

including but not limited to preparing handouts and PowerPointpresentations.

7.2.3. PEG shall facilitate and assist with discussions between the Cityand Kinsei regarding the location of Kinsei facilities in Cleveland.

7.2.4. PEG shall open a Cleveland office within six months of contractexecution.

7.2.5. In the event the City decides to move forward with the project afterobtaining the air permit, PEG shall relocate its U.S. headquarters toCleveland and locate any project-related manufacturing and/ordistribution facilities in Cleveland.

7.2.6. Within Sixty (60) days of contract execution, PEG is to provide alist of the companies it will assist the City in working to attract.

The list shall include company name, address, phone number, aprimary contact, email address, industry type and any otherinformation PEG or the City consider relevant.

7.2.7. The City is under no obligation to accept or utilize any entityprovided by PEG with the exception of Kinsei gasification Designand equipments and, unless deemed appropriate by the City, theCity's normal procurement practices will apply to how the Citymay utilize the products or services offered by the companies thatPEG recommends again with the exception of Kinsei gasificationDesign & equipments.

7.2.8. Payment for this Business Development subtask shall be includedin the overall payment for Task 1.

7.3. PEG shall prepare and submit an initial Basis of Design (BOD).

7.3.1. The BOD shall summarize in tabular format by discipline theentire scope of the project. All project components shall beoutlined in detail. Design parameters of the project includingSPEC writing, but not be limited to, ratings, capacities, designstandards, design parameters, and regulations/codes by unitprocess and facility to be followed in the design by others.

6.3.2. The BOD shall include a detailed discussion of the City-suppliedWaste Composition Study and its impact on the entire systems andprocess design.

6.3.3. The BOD shall contain a detailed description of all pertinentaspects of technologies and equipments to be integrated into thefacility design including waste receiving and separation equipment,waste flow and conveyer systems, gasification process, steamcompression process, brick manufacturing, steam production,electric power generation, fuel pellet compression units and anyother component of the design.

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

15/33

6.3.4. The BOD shall discuss potential environmental impacts and risksof the facility and potential aesthetic, odor, sound, and trafficimpacts on the community.

6.3.5. The BOD shall include a discussion on the required permits for the

installation and operation of the proposed facility.

6.3.6. The BOD shall include a preliminary discussion on potential risk-management strategies.

6.3.7. PEG shall submit and present the initial BOD as a deliverable ofTask 1. The BOD shall be updated and maintained current asdesign progresses.

6.3.8. The initial BOD shall become a section of the initial PEG SystemDesign in the Design Memorandum (DM).

6.3.9. An updated BOD shall be submitted as part of the details in thePEG System Design in the Design Memorandum Submittals asdefined in Task 2.

8.0 Task 2 Design Memorandum (DM)

8.1. PEG shall not proceed with Design Memorandum (DM) without writtenNotice to Proceed.

8.2. The DM shall detail the following items as a minimum:

8.2.1. Existing conditions at the Ridge Road Transfer Station.

8.2.2. Discussion to address feasibility, cost effectiveness, impact onplant operation, maintenance and constructability

8.2.3. Facility plant design recommendations, including a preliminarylayout.

8.2.4. Provide an itemized +/- 20% estimated cost for entire facility basedon preliminary layout. PEG shall provide a detailed breakdown ofthe cost of each system and/or component.

8.2.5. Provide a list of equipment and equipment suppliers to be namedfor each major component of the design. PEG shall also provide alist of performance and equipment guarantees for each system.

8.2.6. All Technical Memoranda (TMs) developed during the course ofthe design arranged by discipline.

8.2.7. A discussion of reason(s) why the project design direction waschosen. The DM shall provide a history of the designs evolutionfrom conceptual to proposed.

8.2.8. The DM shall include a section for Ohio EPA and any other

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

16/33

regulator correspondence, including, but not limited, to comments,permitting requirements, issues, resolutions, and approvalcorrespondence. PEG shall provide a recommended PermittingPath for complete facility installation, construction and operation.PEG shall supply a table listing emission parameters and expected

emission levels for each compared to regulations. PEG shallidentify specific control technology to be used to ensurecompliance with regulations. In addition, PEG shall include adiscussion on net greenhouse gas emission reduction or increaseexplicitly. The discussion shall include a carbon balance equation.

8.2.9. PEG shall review and evaluate the DPUs Engineering standardsbased on the information supplied by DPU and shall identify anyconflicts in the standards as they relate to PEGs standard practicesand applies to the project design. Standard practices shall not beconstrued as personal preferences. PEG shall submit for review its

technical evaluation and recommendations for revisions to thestandards.

8.2.10. DM shall include a Design Issues Resolution Matrix.

8.2.11. PEG shall submit the initial DM as a deliverable of Task 2. TheDM shall be supplemented and maintained current as designprogresses.

8.2.12. PEG shall submit the final DM as a project Close-Out deliverable.

8.3. Primary System Functions and Performances

8.3.1. Facility Entrance and Weighing Station. A location for the weightscale shall be proposed as part of the preliminary facility layout.DM shall include a discussion of the type of weight scale,associated instrumentation, analysis and recording equipment, andany other related appurtances to be specified.

8.3.2. Waste Receiving Station. Design alternatives to existing RidgeRoad Transfer Station shall be presented for the waste receivingstation. Emphasis shall be on the required structure, enclosure,space requirements, waste contaminants, water, odor, dust,weather, and environmental concerns.

8.3.3. Sorting and Separation. A detailed discussion of the sorting andseparation requirements for the proposed systems/process designshall be presented. The discussion shall focus on alternatives forall stages of multiple stage sorting, both manual and mechanical,including staffing and maintenance. Post separation of materialssuch as plastics and other materials not acceptable as clean MSWshall be presented.

8.3.4. Waste Distribution. DM shall present alternatives for wastedistribution throughout the facility to the various processes. Thisdiscussion shall include staffing and maintenance issues.

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

17/33

8.3.5. Complete Material Recovery Facility (MRF). . All materials fromdaily received waste will be delivered to the MRF Center forseparation and packaging. Design for a single stream, co-mingledwaste separator shall be furnished. At the end of the process all

materials shall be grouped and baled for cash sale. Options will bepresented if PEG feels such options are capable of providecompatible performances.

8.3.6. Gasification. DM shall include a detailed discussion of the Kinseigasification equipment and process, as well as limitations,maintenance and staffing requirements. Discussion shall includeexpected feedstock quantity, frequency and composition; sequenceof operation, controls, as well as energy output. A completeenergy balance equation shall be provided for all processes as partof the DM.

8.3.7. Municipal Solid Waste Steam Compression and Fuel Pellets.Steam compression technology alternatives shall be presented inthis section. The technology discussion shall include the nature,volume and frequency of feedstock required, staffing andmaintenance. Fuel pellet management equipment, processing forsale or for gasification process enhancement.

8.3.8. Decorative/landscape Tile and Brick Manufacturing. DM shallinclude alternatives for the processing of gasification ash and otherwaste construction materials into decorative/landscape tiles, bricks,

and/or construction materials that could be sold as an alternaterevenue stream for the facility. Discussion shall include permittingissues in the State of Ohio.

8.3.9. Steam Production and Power Island. A complete discussion ofsteam production technology alternatives, including a steam energybalance for electric power generation and other proposed steamapplications within the facility, steam generation alternatives andelectric power generation alternatives, including sequence ofoperation, monitoring and controls.

8.3.10. Electrical Interconnection Facilities. Discuss connectionalternatives for the furnishing of electric power generated by thefacilitys power island to the existing Ridge Road CPP Substation,and any required modifications to the electrical substation. CPPshall be responsible for the design of feeds into its substation. PEGshall be responsible for the design up to the output of thetransformer.

8.3.11. Water Supply, Storage and Discharge System. Water conditioning,storage, treatment, and disposal equipment alternatives andstrategies shall be identified and discussed.

8.3.12.Odor Control System. Odor removal and air flow controlequipment and options shall be presented in the DM.

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

18/33

8.4 PEG is required to provide adequate information in the DM to allow theCity to issue an RFP on the total facility design before December 31, 2010.

9.0 Task 4 Design Report (DR)

9.1. PEG shall not proceed with Design Report (DR) without written Notice toProceed.

9.2. General Requirements

9.2.1. Professional Engineers knowledgeable and responsible for theproject and licensed in the State of Ohio shall stamp the designspecifications and Ohio Regulatory Agencies applications andfilings.

9.2.2. Proposed systems/process design drawings and specifications andother documents within the scope of this SOW shall be prepared toallow preparation of a MSWE Facility Design Request forProposal (RFP) package for solicitation of Design ProfessionalProposals. However, PEG is not required to provide detailedconstruction design drawings which may be necessary to prepare adetailed MSWE facility cost analysis for construction Proposalpackage.

9.2.3. Drawings shall be prepared for each discipline required to render a

proposed systems/process design to be integrated into a facilitydesign by a qualified Professional Engineering Design Servicesfirm. Drawings shall be prepared in the AutoCAD 2010 version,or latest, and shall meet standard DPU format and notation.

9.2.4. Drawings shall be checked by PEG to ensure continuity with otherdrawings and between disciplines and with applicablespecifications.

9.2.5. PEG is solely and ultimately responsible for the design of Phase Iof the project and shall take ownership of the proposedpreliminary design parameters, regardless of whether or not theparameters are included in the DPU Engineering Standards andMaster Specifications.

9.2.6. PEG shall prepare Technical Specifications (AIA format), Division02 through 17, in accordance with the DPU Master Specifications(to be provided by DPU) if applicable to this Agreement.Specifications shall address only the project scope of work andshould exclude items not applicable to the current project.

9.2.7. Specifications shall define the recommended and acceptableequipment, process, and materials applicable to the project, withinguidelines, as applicable and as established by the DPUEngineering Standards.

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

19/33

9.2.8. PEG shall complete the level of facility design necessary to obtainall air emissions permit(s) from the Ohio EPA.

9.2.9. PEG shall include a list of required permits, and include a schedule

and requirements or conditions for obtaining those permits. Asuggested Permitting Path for facility installation, construction andoperation shall be included. However, PEG is required for the airpermits application only.

9.2.10. PEG shall provide to DPU a draft of all required air emissionspermit applications in adequate time for review and submittal tomeet permit schedule. Following DPU review, PEG shall revisethe permit applications and shall submit them to the respectiveauthorities (Specific permit requirements are part of Task 5.Permitting).

9.3. Primary System Functions and Performance

9.3.1. Facility Entrance and Weighing Station.

9.3.2. Waste Receiving Stat ion.

9.3.3. Sorting and Separation.

9.3.4. Waste Distribution.

9.3.5. Complete Material Recovery Facility (MRF).

9.3.6. Gasification.

9.3.7. Municipal Solid Waste Steam Compression and Fuel Pellets.

9.3.8. Decorative Tile and Brick Manufacturing.

9.3.9. Steam Production and Power Island.

9.3.10. Electrical Interconnection Facilities.

9.3.12. Odor Control System.

10.0 Task 5 Permitting

10.1. PEG shall not proceed with Permitting without written Notice to Proceed.

10.2. Required Permitting, Including Environmental Permitting

10.2.1. An undetermined number of permits by an undetermined numberof regulators are required for the authorized installation andoperation of the proposed Municipal Solid Waste to Energy

Facility, all its associated components, and related operations. PEGshall present a detailed analysis and listing of ALL identified

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

20/33

permitting required for the legal, authorized installation,construction and operation of such facility based on all the designparameters and conditions, location, refuse composition, traffic,power generation, steam production. Scope of permitting requiredin this permit analysis shall not be limited to that required to

process the contents of the City-supplied Waste CompositionStudy, but shall include all identified and selected wastecomposition required for the proper operation of the facility asproposed, and utilizing the proposed equipment for the proposedpower/steam energy output.

10.2.2. All services, including anticipated meetings with the variousauthorities, shall be provided by PEG as part of the air emissionspermit(s) application process.

10.2.3. PEG shall submit to DPU a draft of all air emissions permit(s)

applications, modeling, analysis and all other reports required forproper documentation and submittal to regulatory authorities thirty(30) days prior to each submission for approval. PEG shall revisepermit applications upon review.

10.2.4. PEG shall address, as part of its contract, any Notices ofDeficiency issued by regulatory agencies in connection with the airemissions permit-to-install permitting process.

10.2.5. PEG shall submit each required air emissions permit(s)application(s), including making any required or needed

presentations to regulators, or facilitate any required or neededmeetings between the City of Cleveland, its agents, partners in thisproject, funders, stakeholders or others, as needed or required, toobtain all required permitting. PEG shall bear the cost of all airemissions permitting required for the approval of theprocess/systems in this contract.

11.0 Task 6 Project Close-Out

11.1. PEG shall not proceed with Project Close-out without written Notice toProceed.

11.2. Record Drawings

11.2.1. PEG shall submit a set of Record Drawings at the conclusion of theproject. Drawings shall conform to the DPU EngineeringStandards and shall incorporate data, information, sketches andworking drawings that reflect the proposed equipment/systemdesign, including RFIs, change orders, etc.

11.2.2. PEG shall prepare a conceptual facility layout including equipmentand instrument loop diagrams pertaining to the proposed designsystems/process equipment and proposed plant layout. However amore detailed set of Mechanical drawings will be required as partof a complete set of Construction drawings including point to point

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

21/33

interconnections and wiring diagrams of which Princeton is notrequired to provide in this Agreement.

11.2.3. Record Drawings (including instrument loop diagrams) shall besubmitted to DPU within four (4) weeks of projects Final

Acceptance.

11.3. Instrumentation Data Sheets

11.3.1. PEG shall provide instrument data sheets for each proposed controland/or monitoring equipment.

11.3.2. Instrument data sheets shall be submitted to the DPU PROJECTMANAGER within four (4) weeks of Contractors FinalAcceptance.

11.3.3. PEG shall provide one (1) Mylar set, ten (10) complete paper setsand three (3) electronic copies of each submittal. PEG shallconfirm with DPU the number of copies required prior to eachsubmittal. Electronic copies shall be submitted on CDROM andshall include all files in original electronic format.

12.0 Optional Tasks

12.1. Optional Tasks may be exercised, deleted, revised, reduced, orsubstituted at the discretion of the Commissioner. Should PEG berequested to perform an Optional Task, the staff-hours shall be

negotiated with PEG using actual hourly rates and the multipliersidentified in this base proposal.

12.2. The following potential Optional Tasks have identified by DPU.

12.2.1. Additional Design Services, Construction Support and DocumentManagement Support Allowance for PEG to provide additionaldesign and construction services and assign additional personnel tosupport and monitor design services and construction activities tobe authorized at DPU discretion for emergent or unplanned workscope.

12.2.2. The Optional Task Allowance amount for this project shall beassigned during the project, if needed.

12.3 PEG has option to reject any Optional Tasks if PEG feels by acceptingOptional Task(s) may jeopardize it time schedule and/or ability toimplement defined Tasks in a timely schedule.

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

22/33

SECTION 4

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

Princeton Environmental Group, Inc.

Princeton Environmental Group, Inc. is a full service environmental service company

providing innovative, comprehensive waste-to-energy solutions. Princeton

Environmental is the exclusive North American licensee of the GB Gasification

Technology invented by Kinsei Sangyo Co. of Japan, a leading biomass/solid waste

gasification engineering company with 69 patents worldwide including 5 in the U.S.,

over 300 waste processing gasification systems in operation and 40+ year records of

success.

Gasification is a flexible, reliable and environmentally friendly engineering that can turna variety of low value feedstocks into high value energy/fuel products. The Princeton

Gasification units convert waste into energy by processing solid and liquid waste at high

temperature with minimal oxygen and creating syngas. Syngas is then utilized as the

primary fuel required by system operation and producing heat, electricity, steam and

other bio fuels. Princetons technology converts waste with higher than 95% efficiency;

the remaining ash remnants are collected which can be sold as road paving or

construction materials. Due to high fuel self-reliance, the operating costs of Kinsei

equipment is far below comparable systems.

Princeton Environmental provides larger waste systems for municipalities and smallerunits for hospitals and manufacturing wastes. Princeton gasification systems are capable

of processing a wide spectrum of waste including regulated and hazardous wastes such as

hospital red bag waste, x-ray films, toxic chemicals and are capable of converting them to

valuable energies for their hosting facilities. This technology has been validated by over

35 years of operation in Japanese municipalities, hospitals, laboratories, chemical and

pharmaceutical companies.

After 5 years of research and developments, Princeton has accumulated a group of

advanced engineering and technology companies as a team providing comprehensive

services and solutions to municipalities and large waste generators and capable ofservicing them with turn-key solutions.

Management Team:

Mr. Peter Tien

President

Peter Tien is the founder and the President of Princeton Environmental Group, aprofessional company that provides total waste-to-energy solutions using the worldleading gasification technology of Kinsei Sangyo, Company LTD. Japan.

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

23/33

Mr. Tiens experience encompasses many facets of the industrial world includingmarketing and sales, administration and operations, manufacturing and engineering. Hehas held management positions with major US companies responsible for productresearch and development, market strategic planning, manufacturing and quality control.In the 80s and 90s, he successfully served and worked with companies such as IBM,

Seagate, Osicom and Brother USA. Among all the companies that he served, Mr. Tienhas been credited as an industrial visionary and a foremost forward thinking designer.Starting in the mid 90s, he founded and cofounded a number of companies includingGeneral Technologies and National Logistics and sold them for a profit after successfullyrunning them for 4 to 6 years. Some of his product designs from these endeavors are stillgenerating continuous royalty income for him.

Mr. Tien holds a Bachelor of Science degree from National Taiwan University, Taiwanand received advanced training in Industrial Design from Pratt Institute, New York.

After 5 years of diligent efforts, Mr. Tien has successfully promoted Kinsei technology to

major industrial groups and to municipalities throughout the United States. During thistime, he has conducted extensive marketing research, met with potential clients andevaluated a number of potential applications for the Kinsei technology.

Mr. Masamoto Kaneko

Inventor, Chief Science Officer

Mr. Masamoto Kaneko, founding owner of Kinsei Sangyo Company LTD, graduated

from Gunma Prefecture University with a bachelor degree and established Kinsei in the

city of Takasaki, Japan.

Mr. Kaneko was invited to be part of the research team formed by the JapaneseGovernment to identify effective waste elimination engineering. After 11 years of

dedicated research, he adopted the principle of gasification and invented his proprietary

process technology and named it the GB Solid Waste Dry Distillation Process.

Kinsei commissioned the worlds first solid waste gasification system in 1978 and has

designed more than 500 systems during the last 30 years. Today, Kinsei has been

awarded 69 patents in 19 countries and has more than 300 systems in operation

throughout Asia processing multiple waste groups including manufacturing and

hazardous wastes.

When Mr. Kaneko started his quest 50 years ago, his primary missions were (1) toeliminate waste effectively and efficiently, (2) recover waste energies to minimize fossildependency. These were his missions back then and they are even more true today. 60%of Kinsei equipments are enhanced with energy recovery capacities.

Masamoto Kanekos U.S. Patent List

Patent Title Inventor

US 5,213,051, May 25, 1993 Apparatus for Incinerating Waste Material Masamoto Kaneko

US 5,619,938, April 15, 1997Method of Incinerating Waste Material by Way

of Dry Distillation and GasificationMasamoto Kaneko

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

24/33

US 5,653,180, August 5, 1997Apparatus for Incinerating Waste Material by

Dry Distillation and GasificationMasamoto Kaneko

US 6,746,497, June 8, 2004 Waste Incineration Disposal Method Masamoto Kaneko

B. J. Britt,

V.P. Of Energy Operation

Prior to Princeton, Mr. Britt was a partner of Sterling Energy Services, LLC and has over34 years experience in power/energy industries. During the past 12 years as a partner inSterling Energy, he has been responsible for various activities including the developmentof new business in the areas of industrial energy efficiency assessments, projectimplementation and energy procurement. He also manages and reviews the energy auditsfor the clients of Sterling and consults with Sterlings clients on decisions involving thechanging gas and electric energy markets. He has special expertise in co-generation andpower generation systems and analysis and works closely with industrial and commercialenergy users to evaluate energy options and secure more competitive energy supplies

from energy providers.

Before Sterling Energy, Mr. Britt was a senior project engineer at Southern ElectricInternational (SEI). While at SEI, Mr. Britt was responsible for the development ofbusiness activities that centered on using generation resources owned by a utilityscustomers. These generation resources were primarily used by utilities to meet peakpower needs.

In addition, he developed relationships with several companies in the pulp and paperindustry that focus on redeveloping their power generation resources as power supplyassets for SEI. Mr. Britt worked in a variety of business areas in the Southern Company

before joining Southern Electric International. Some of these are listed as follows:

The development of strategic marketing and resource supply strategies;

Evaluation of financial impacts and economic viability of energy reductionstrategies undertaken by customers;

Identification and assessment of business risks and economic impacts associatedwith independent power and renewable energy projects;

Review and negotiation of bulk power sales agreements; fuel procurement anddelivery;

Renewable energy resource availability;

Analysis of environmental compliance, and Securing various government agency approvals for energy programs.

Mr. Britt attended Mississippi State University, where he earned a BS in AerospaceEngineering and Georgia State University earning an MBA in Finance and Economics.

Anthony Margida, Ph.D.V.P of Operation

Anthony Margida has 24 years experience developing and commercializing newtechnologies as well as company creation and funding in the specialty chemical,advanced material, adhesive, renewable energy, MEMS, lubricant, silicone, water

purification and medical device industries. He is currently Executive Director for New

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

25/33

Global Ventures providing business development, funding and strategic partneringleadership for both domestic and international technology companies.

Dr. Margida recently served as Company Formation Advisor for Battelles EmergentServices (2004-2007) and Glennan Microsystems Inc. (2006-2007) providing leadership

for the creation of start-up companies in Ohio centered on NASA technologies. Heauthored the Emergent Services process for technology company creation and led theeffort to form eight new technology based companies and help over 30 others in threeyears. The technologies of the assisted companies included alternative energy, micro-power generation, extreme environment sensors, water purification, light scattering, andwireless implantable medical sensors.

He served as Director of Technology for H.B.Fuller Adhesives and PolyOne ElastomerAdditives as well as Commercial Development Leader for Lord Corporation. Dr.Margida has been instrumental in launching both the Magnetorheological Fluid businessat Lord Corporation and the global footwear adhesive business at H.B.Fuller. He has

played a leading role in establishing technology development and commercializationprocesses at Lord, H.B.Fuller, and Harwick. He has been awarded four patents andnamed PolyOne Technology Innovator of the Year in 2001.

Dr. Margida received his Ph.D. in organic chemistry from the University of Akron (1984)and a BA from the College of Wooster (1979) graduating with honors at both institutions.He was elected Phi Beta Kappa at Wooster and received his business education at theUniversity of North Carolina Kenan-Flagler Business School in the Program forTechnology Managers (1995).

Current Projects:

USA

AMP-Ohio: Mini Trash to Energy Power PlantA 300 ton/day trash to energy project is to be implemented in 2010 of which City ofClyde has entered a power purchase agreement, with approval of City Council, withPrinceton Environmental Group.

AMP-Ohio (American Municipal Power-Ohio) has approved the technology proposed byPrinceton and will implement his project in 2010 and will consider additional 40-45 unitsamong its cooperative members.

US Army: Truck mounted, Mini Waste to Energy SystemFrom 26 companies, Princeton was selected to implement a technology validation projectwith a truck mounted, mobile mini waste to energy system using Princeton gasificationtechnology.

This equipment, once certified by the U.S, Army, will be equipped with U.S. militaryforces with total sale potential exceeding 100 systems.

U.S. Military Base: Stationary Waste to Energy SystemPrinceton has been selected to provide 6 testing units to U.S. Military bases in 2010 withdaily processing capacity from 10 tons per day to 100 tons per day.

Total sales potential is 180 military base installations of various capacities.

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

26/33

Sewage Solids Waste to Energy Project working jointly with United Water, Auburn, NewHemisphere and EPA, Massachusetts to design and build a sewage solids gasificationsystem to be operated in a existing sewage processing plant located in Gloucester, MAusing sewage solids syngas to power has turbine for electricity generation.

Sales potential exceeds 10,000 applications.

Japan

Currently there are 300 systems in operation processing MSW, industrial waste andmanufacturing waste. System are owned and operated by companies such as Mitsubishi,Hitachi, Good Year Tire, Bridgestone Tires, BML, Marutoku, Kao Food ManufacturingCo, Kirin Beer, Yokohama Tires, etc. with processing capacity from 5 tons per day to150 tons per day. 60% of these companies are enhanced with energy recovery equipmentsproducing heat, hot water and steam.

China

48 systems are in operations processing hospital and hazardous wastes.

2 iconic systems in China near Shanghai are currently processing 1,000 ton per day ofMSW for electricity power were designed or partially designed by Princeton design teamand the power islands both of these 2 facilities are equipped by Princeton equipments.

DOBCO INC.

Dobco Inc. is an established multi-faceted general construction firm with $250M perproject bonding capacity from Zurich which focuses on providing reliable andexceptional quality of Design-Build, Construction, Energy, Development, and Facilityservices to local, state, and federal governmental agencies. The company wasincorporated on July 21, 1989 and has a principal address at 57 Goffle Road, Hawthorne,NJ 07506. Dobco Inc. will be celebrating its 25th Anniversary in performingconstruction projects.

One of the key elements to our success is the ability to self-perform a magnitude of tradesthat includes but is not limited to concrete, masonry, structural steel, and heating,ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) which gives us a competitive edge in themarketplace. Although our primary focus of work is in the public sector, Dobco Inc. hasan established preferred subcontractor list that allows the ability to be equally competitivein the commercial and private markets.

Capabilities:

Design/Build

Our emphasis is on quality, expedience and value. We invest in people, equipment andtechnology to assure our clients a cost effective solution. These advantages, along withDOBCO Groups competitive pricing strategy provide cost saving opportunities, timelyproject completion and quicker occupancy for our customers.

Whether your project is simple or complex, DOBCO Group will make dependableservice an integral part of your design and construction experience. Your project will be

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

27/33

enhanced, and your costs reduced, by our focus on safety, quality, productivity andcustomer service.

Our services include: Concept development

Initial project design/budget Architectural and engineering preparation/final design Cost estimate/guarantee Pre-construction planning and project implementation Safe and efficient project construction Team coordination On time, on budget delivery Post-construction warranty and maintenance Full satisfaction/long term relationship

Construction

In todays market, buildings are required to be more intelligent than ever before. Becauseof short delivery times and complexity of building projects, the key personnel in buildteams must be highly trained and able to see a project from concept through delivery.

DOBCO Construction Services delivers what clients need in today's demandingconstruction environments; we're seasoned experts in working with project teammembers to realize building designs. A central informational tool for all team members isemployed so that a project may achieve constructability, maintainability, andsustainability.

Development

We provide sound advice during the early planning stages of a project, translating anowners goals and objectives into a clear and comprehensive presentation of strategiesand approaches. This may involve evaluating existing facilities for functionality,adequacy and purpose as the prelude to designing new facilities.

DOBCO Group brings over 10 year of property development experience to every project.This translates into an ability to identify, evaluate and acquire properties capable offulfilling the desired goals. Our experience is particularly valuable during the critical duediligence phase when the financial, title, zoning, environmental and other representation,upon which acquisitions depend, are reviewed and verified.

FacilitiesDOBCO Facilities Services specializes in flawless facility performance so our clients canfocus on outperforming their competition. Our people have experience in the public andprivate sectors of various global markets. And whether we partner with our clients toprovide tactical solutions to support their real estate strategies, or recruit, develop andretain our own on-site staffs, we help businesses enhance productivity.

Our people have the optimal blend of capabilities and technical expertise to help clientsachieve the highest levels of performance. Our top industry experts work in multiplefacilities in nearly every market and they provide mechanical services to many more.

With wireless connectivity to a continually updated database, our people benchmark

performance across a variety of organizations and facilities types.

Energy

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

28/33

DOBCO Energy delivers a broad range of energy expertise and services. Fromconsultation and design/build to commissioning/re-commissioning and operation andmaintenance, we can participate in project work during any phase, or every phase.And with a presence in nearly every market in the world, we can assemble the bestcombination of skills and expertise and quickly provide clients with the best solutions for

their specific needs.Our team of energy professionals includes accredited experts, multi-disciplinedprofessional engineers, efficiency and conservation experts, estimators, operators, andother energy specialists covering nearly every type of facility, for solutions that powerbusiness forward.

General ContractorsMost Recent Projects:

Macarthur Barracks West Point, NYLocated at West Point Military Academy in New York; a lump sum contract to complete

a total faade restoration for the historical student barracks. A traditional design/bid/buildproject delivery system was employed for project delivery. DOBCO ConstructionServices (DCS) worked directly for the Federal Government to deliver the project,swiftly, and within budget constraints so that the cadets may occupy the barracks for theupcoming year.

Ravenswood Houses Long Island City, NYDOBCO Construction Services (DCS) was chosen by the New York City HousingAuthority as the contractor to complete a total site improvement at the RavenswoodHousing Complex located in Long Island City, NY, encompassing a total of seven cityblocks. The project included the installation new pedestrian walkways and recreation

areas for the residents of the complex. Through a process of tenant notification and strictschedule & phasing administration, DOBCOs team successfully delivered the seven cityblocks to the owner within the allowed time frame and within budget.

General Grant Houses New York, NYA large project south of West 125th Street between Broadway and Morningside Avenue,the site consists of nine buildings, 13 and 21 stories tall with 1,940 apartments providinghousing to over 1400 families. DOBCO Construction Services (DCS) was chosen by TheNew York City Housing Authority do perform a complete restoration of the faades atthe housing complex within a minimal time frame. Through the use of innovativeequipment and specialized labor forces, the project was delivered on time and within

budget.

East Orange Campus High School East Orange, NJDOBCO Construction Services (DCS) was chosen as the prime general contractor tocomplete the addition of a New Auditorium and reception to the East Orange CampusHigh School as a new structure to complement the existing campus. Paired up with acreative design team in a traditional design/bid/build series, DOBCO ConstructionServices (DCS) delivered the new 700 student Auditorium seamlessly to the owner.

John Y. Dater School Ramsey, NJDOBCO Construction Services (DCS) was chosen as the general contractor to complete

construction of a new 90,000 sf. School building including cafeteria and gym adjacent tothe existing John Y. Dater School. Construction was completed in innovative ways to

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

29/33

assure that the construction activities would not disturb the students attending classes atthe adjacent existing school. After construction was completed, DOBCO ConstructionServices razed the existing school and developed the parcel into a recreational area forthe students.

Memorial School North Haledon, NJThe work consisted of general construction services for a 62,000 square foot two-storyschool and 8,500 square foot of a single story multi-purpose room. DOBCO ConstructionServices (DCS) employed an innovative project team in conjunction with a cutting edgedocument management tool to painlessly deliver this project under budget and on time.

Anisfield School of Business, Ramapo College of New Jersey Mahwah, NJDOBCO Construction Services (DCS) completed this project as the single overallcontractor for the new Anisfield School of Business at Ramapo College of New Jersey.The project consisted of the construction of a new five story superstructure, including fullbasement and mechanical penthouse, this academic building connects to an existing four

story classroom building. Faced by the owners eagerness to occupy the building and thearchitects perplexing design ideas, DOBCO Construction Services rose to the challengeto deliver a first class smart building to the owner on time and within budget.

Dr. John Grieco Elementary School Englewood, NJDOBCO Construction Services (DCS) performed general construction activities at theDr. John Grieco Elementary School project. The project consisted of the construction ofa new three story elementary school totaling approximately 90,000 square feet. Coupledwith an innovative design team and a proactive build team, DOBCO was able to facilitateall the requested needs by the owner to deliver a beautiful building within the limitedtime frame and under budget.

Client List:

US Army Corp of Engineers, West Point, NY State of New York, Office of General Services(OGS), Albany, NY

Dormitory Authority of the State of New York(DASNY), New York, NY

General Services Administration (GSA), NewYork, NY

New York City Department of Design andConstruction (NYCDDC), LIC, NY

New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA),New York, NY

New York City Parks & Recreation, Flushing, NY New York City Health and HospitalsCorporation, Jamaica, NY

Port Authority of New York and New Jersey,Newark, NJ

Yonkers Public Schools, Yonkers, NY

CPC Specialty Products, Inc Morris Public School Systems, Morristown, NJ

Montessori Childrens House, Morristown, NJ Borough of Far Hills, Far Hills, NJChesterfield Township Board of Education, Trenton,NJ

Millburn Township, Millburn, NJ

NJ Turnpike Authority, New Brunswick, NJ Lakewood Board of Education, Lakewood, NJ

Bridgewater-Raritan School District, Bridgewater,NJ

State of NY, Facilities Development Corp.,Albany, NY

Dallastown Area School District, Dallastown, PA State University Construction Fund, Albany, NY

Office of Design & Construction, Syracuse, NY New Brunswick Housing Authority, NewBrunswick, NJ

Solanco School District, Lancaster, PA Pennsylvania Department of Transportation,Harrisburg, PA

Cumberland Valley School District, Mechanicsburg,PA

Cumberland Valley School District,Mechanicsburg, PA

Burnt Hills - Ballston Lake Central School, Troy,NY

NYC School Construction Authority, LIC, NY

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

30/33

Human Resources Administration, New York, NY CPC Specialty Products, Inc., Ridgefield, NJ

New York Life, New York, NY Host Marriot Corporation, Bethesda, MD

Regent Baby Products, Jamaica, NY Yeshiva Rabbi Dov Revel, Forrest Hills, NY

SECTION 5TECHNICAL SCOPE OF WORK

PEG has prepared a detailed Primary Task and Sub-Task time schedule includingearned value milestones in this SOW (see Exhibit B)

Preliminary Technical Approach: Based upon the Scope of Work, the attachedExhibit B shall provide the technical approach describing how PEG intends tocarry out its work.

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

31/33

SECTION 6

FEE STATEMENT

1.0 DP shall complete and submit with its Statement the Tables, Forms, and otherinformation identified below.

2.0 Scope Exceptions

2.1. The Fee proposed shall be based on the Scope of Services, conditions,and schedule as defined in this SOWR - NO EXCEPTIONS .

2.2. The Fee Table, City-required Forms and OEO schedules identified in this

Section may be found in ATTACHMENT C, City Forms.

3.0 Fee Table

3.1. Complete and submit Table 1, Fee Table.

The following is the Fee Table of this Agreement:MSWE Facility Design and Permitting

Task Amount

1 Project Star up $300,000.00

2Basis of Design $100,000.00

3Design Memorandum $100,000.00

4Design Report $100,000.00

5 Stage 1 Air Permit ApplicationStage 2 Receipt of Air Permits

$100,000.00$200,000.00

6 Close Out $600,000.00

TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE: $1,500,000.00

3.1.1. Electronic, editable Fee Tables are provided as a convenience (byrequest) to PEG for its use in preparing its Statement. DPU is notresponsible for mathematical errors in Fee Table submitted byPEG. DPU reserves the right to adjust the proposed fee to correctidentified mathematical errors.

3.1.2. Identify the pre-defined Optional Task Fee will be set if necessary

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

32/33

during the Work.

3.1.3. Identify Grand Total Fee.

3.1.4. Identify the total fee proposed for EACH CSB and the percent ofthe Project GRAND TOTAL each CSB represents. This mustconform to OEO Schedules 2 & 3.

4.0 Sample Agreement

PEG has submitted its proposed Sample Agreement with PEG proposedmodifications and revisions (See Exhibit A)

5.0 City Required Forms

5.1. The City-required forms are to be completed by the PEG and submittedwith its Statement. Subconsultants are NOT to submit these forms.

5.2. Federal Taxpayer ID Form

5.3. Northern Ireland Fair Employment Practices Disclosure

5.4. Non-Competitive Bid Contract Statement

6.0 Office of Equal Opportunity Schedules

6.1. The Schedules of MBE and FBE participation shall be fully completedand SIGNED. Participation should be designed to meet or exceed thegoals for CSB utilization of10%, respectively of the proposed GRANDTOTAL fee.

6.2. Return EVERY Schedule, even if not applicable. Mark as N/A and sign theschedule.

6.3. Schedule 1 Contract Employment Report (completed by PEG)

6.4. Schedule 2 Schedule of Minority and Female Participation (completed byPEG)

6.5. Schedule 3 Statement of Intent to Perform as a Subcontractor (completedby EACH Subconsultant)

6.6. Schedule 4 Application for Certification as a Joint Venture (completed byPEG)

6.7. Schedule 5 MBE/FBE Inability/Unavailability Certification (completed byPEG)

6.8. Schedule 6 All Other Subcontractors Schedule of Participation (completedby PEG)

8/3/2019 Princeton SOW 3.30.2010

33/33

6.9. Subconsultants are to submit ONLY Schedule 3.

7.0 Consultant Statement of Period that Statement Fee is Valid.

SECTION 7

SCHEDULE AND MILESTONES

1.0 The schedule provides detailed Milestones for the project design at the RidgeRoad Transfer Station.

2.0 A schedule provided in the Project Definition Report is provided as a reference.The milestone dates to which the PEG should plan are identified below.

PEG should develop its schedule and assign resources accordingly to meet the

Milestone dates.

3.0 PEG shall explain any variance or deviation in its proposed schedule from thatpresented in the SOW.