polk transportation planning organization 2035 mobility vision plan august 2010 steering committee -...

Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan

August 2010

August 2010

Steering Committee - January 28, 2010


Polk Transportation Planning OrganizationPolk Transportation Planning Organization


August 2010

Topics

• Introduction

• Project Prioritization

• Transit

• Highways

• Non-Motorized Facilities

• Financial Resources

• Draft Cost Feasible Plan


August 2010

Introduction

• The Draft Cost Feasible Plan is a financially constrained version of the 2035 Needs Plan based on available revenue (federal, state & local) through the year 2035.

• The Draft Cost Feasible Plan contains the most important projects (priorities) indentified in the Needs Plan.

• These projects are the source for the TPO’s future priority projects.


August 2010

Introduction

• Staff is requesting the Board to review and approve the 2035 Draft Cost Feasible Plan.

• Public Review and Comment Period• August 12th through December 9th.

• 2035 MVP Public Hearing and Final Adoption is scheduled for December 9th.


August 2010

Transit Prioritization


August 2010


August 2010

Eight Scoring Criteria:

•Previous Plans (2060 Plan,

PTA Expansion)

•Regional Connectivity and

Accessibility (Transit

Centers/Park and Ride Lots)

•Transit Potential

•Urban Form and Planned

Growth

•Public Input

Transit Evaluation Criteria & Scoring


August 2010

Additional Considerations

• PTA Plan represents first five years of cost affordable transit improvements

• Subsequent phasing will be based on project ranking with the following considerations emphasized:

– Anticipated route productivity (ridership)

– Available projected revenues

– Public input

– Timing of growth – implement improvements in growth areas concurrent with anticipated development


August 2010

Highway Prioritization


August 2010

Yellow indicates Change Since March


August 2010

State Intermodal System (SIS) Cost-Feasible Projects in Polk County

Road From To Improvement Type

Phase Cost (YOE $M)

Period

US 98 Manor Dr CR 540-A Widen to 6L Const 30.707 2015-2019

US 27 N of SR 540 N of SR 542

Widen to 6L Const 25.485 2015-2019

US 98 CR 540A SR 540 Widen to 6L Const 69.825 2020-2025

US 27 Richie Rd Barry Rd Widen to 6L ROW & Const

89.487 2020-2025

US 27 Barry Rd Lake Co Line

Widen to 6L ROW & Const

148.006 2031-2035

Source: SIS Long Range Capacity Plan (Approved 2009)


August 2010

Highway Project Prioritization – Non-SIS Roads

Based on Approved 2035 Goals & Objectives

• Multi-Modal System Development

• Environmental Sustainability

• Regional Support

• Freight & Goods Movement

• Efficiency & Interconnectivity

• Safety & Security

• Public Input


August 2010

Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d)• Candidate projects evaluated by whether they

would:

– Complete or fill gap(s) in system

– Connect directly to desired destinations or facilities

– Lie within specific designated areas

– Address problems or enhance designated facilities

– Satisfy need(s) expressed by public


August 2010


August 2010

Non-motorized Transportation


August 2010

Non-motorized Facilities

• Top 100 Projects identified for:– Bicycle Improvements – typically done as part

of road projects– Sidewalk Improvements – done as part of

road projects or stand-alone enhancements

• Multi-Use Trail Projects– Typically done as funding & opportunities

arise


August 2010

PRIORITY ROAD FROM TO COST

5 CR 557* US 17/92 I-4 $1,560,461.30

9 US 17/92 (SEVENTEENTH ST)* HINSON AVE CR 547 $126,970.00

19 US 98* EDGEWOOD DR LAKE PARKER AVE $379,640.30

20 US 98* SR 540 EDGEWOOD DR $355,516.00

22 US 98* LYLE PKWY CR 540A $812,608.00

36 CR 542A (GALLOWAY RD)* US 92 10TH ST $634,850.00

51 US 98* CR 540A SR 540 $961,162.90

55 SR 35 (BARTOW RD)* LAKE PARKER AVE S MAIN ST $152,364.00

$4,983,572.50

Cumulative Total for Top 100 Sidewalk Projects $51,750,305.63

Less Projects Included in Highway Needs $4,983,572.50

$46,766,733.13


August 2010

PRIORITY ROAD FROM TO COST

3 CR 557* US 17/92 I-4 $1,721,239.98

24 WABASH AVE S* ARIANA ST US 92 $284,656.38

55 US 17 (SIXTH ST NW)* 6TH ST SW @ AVE A SW SR 544 $465,559.50

64 CR 542A (GALLOWAY RD)* US 92 10TH ST $675,726.36

$3,147,182.22

Cumulative Total for Top 100 Bike Projects $39,960,967.14

Less Projects Included in Highway Needs $3,148,182.22

$36,812,784.92


August 2010

Financial Resources


August 2010

Other Arterials (State & Fed.), $409

Enhancement Funds (Fed.), $13

TRIP, $44

Local Ad Val Tax, $991

Local Op. Gas Tax, $175

Impact Dist A, $26

Impact Dist B, $92

Impact Dist C, $117

Impact Dist D, $88

Impact Dist E, $121

Community Redev.

Areas, $33

Highway Funding Forecast by Source(YOE $M, 2015 - 2035)

Total Funding = $2,109 M (YOE)

DRAFT


August 2010


August 2010

Highway Capacity NeedsEstimated Costs (2016 –

2035, in PDC)

Total Needs $5,918 M

Cost Feasible Projects $1,819 M

Difference $4,099 M

DRAFT


August 2010

Central Polk Parkway• PD& E study underway• $30 to $36M needed to fund Design in Cost

Feasible Plan• Right-of-Way & Construction Unfunded• Seek Additional Funding through:

– Next SIS Plan - TRIP– Federal Earmark(s) - Private Sources– Toll Revenues


August 2010

Federal Cash Grants, $210

State Cash Grants, $79

Federal Discretionary Grants, $28

State Service Development

Grants, $7

Passenger Fares, $81

Proposed Local Tax, $914

Transit Funding Forecast(2015 - 2035, YOE $M) Total Funding = $1,320 M (YOE)

DRAFT


August 2010


August 2010

Transit Needs (2011 – 2035) Estimated Costs (PDC)

Total Needs* $3,214 M

Cost Feasible Projects $1,004 M

Difference $2,210 M

DRAFT* Assumes operating needs phased in over life of plan


August 2010

Funding Set-Aside for Other Projects• $80 M reserved for 2016 - 2035• For Congestion Management Projects, to be

determined:– Sidewalk Projects– Multi-Use Trail Projects– Intersection Improvements– Intelligent Transportation System Enhancements


August 2010

Questions / Comments Action Requested: Approve Draft Cost

Feasible Plan for Public Distribution & Feedback The Citizens and Technical Advisory

Committees recommend that the TPO Board approve the 2035 MVP Draft Cost Feasible Plan.


August 2010

End Presentation


August 2010


August 2010

Project Evaluation Criterion Assessment Scoring (Points)

Project Completes:

Sidewalk Top 100 In Top 100 = Y 1

Sidewalk Gap Fills Sidewalk Facility Gap/Need = Y 1

Bicycle Top 100 In Top 100 = Y 1

Bicycle Facility Gap Fills Bicycle Facility Gap/Need = Y 1

Project Connects Directly to:

Airport Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

Park & Ride Lot Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

Transit Center Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

Regional Intermodal Hub Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

Regional Activity Center Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

Freight Activity Center Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

High Speed Rail Station Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

Project is Within:

Environmental Justice (EJ) Area F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None

F=2, P=1, N=0

Multimodal LOS District District I, II or III III=3, II=2, I=1

Transit Supportive Development Area

F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None

F=2, P=1, N=0

Transit Corridors and Centers Overlay

F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None

F=2, P=1, N=0

100-Year Flood Hazard Area H = high, M = moderate, L or blank = Low

H=0, M=1, L=2

ETDM Environmental Screening Tool Analysis:

Potential Cumulative Degree of Effect

H = high, M = moderate, L or blank = Low (see EST Results tab)

H=0, M=1, L=2

Project Evaluation Criterion Assessment Scoring (Points)

Project Enhances or Improves:

Evacuation Route Y = Evac Route 1Regional Road Network Y = on Regional Network 1Regional Transit Route Y = Serves regional or inter-county

transit route1

Strategic Intermodal System Facility Y = on SIS 1

Major Truck Route Y = on Truck Route 1Major Road Network Connectivity Y = Makes New Connection between

Major Roads1

Current Congestion LOS D; LOS E; LOS F; all others = A-C (based on 5 yr LOS)

F=5, E=3, D=1, A-C=0

Future Congestion Volume to Capacity Ratio (based on 2035 E+C Network V/C)

>1.50 = 5, 1.25 to 1.50 = 3, 1.00 to

1.24 = 1, <1.00 = 0

Safety Top 50 Crash Locations (2005 - 2009) # = Number of Locations

intersected by project

Public Involvement:

Public Input on Project Public comments received on facility or corridor (as of April 2010)

# = Number of times cited as need

in surveys

Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology


August 2010

Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology (Cont’d.)•Environmental Screening GIS Tool Used to Evaluate Potential Degree of Effect on Natural & Man-Made Environment•Analyzed project impact within 500’ buffer•Scores based on # of features found or % of buffer area falling within:

Wetland Areas Recreational Areas

Wildlife & Habitat Areas Prime Farmlands

Flood Hazard Areas Historic/Arch. Sites

Special Areas (e.g. Green Swamp Contaminated Sites


August 2010

2030 TRIP 2035 MVP

Criteria Relative Weight Criteria Relative Weight

Existing Congestion

12.5% Efficiency & Interconnectivity

20%

Future Congestion 12.5%

Freight/Economic Competitiveness

20% Freight & Goods Movement

15%

Community Impacts

10% Multi-Modal System Dev.

15%

Environmental Impacts

10% Environmental Sustainability

20%

Safety 20% Safety & Security 20%

Project Status 10% Regional Support 5%

Short-Term Need 5% Public Input 5%

Total 100% Total 100%


August 2010

Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d)

•Relative Weight (%) assigned to each category divided by maximum points for that category to arrive at weighted scores

•Ranking based on weighted scores

•Ranked project list divided into Tiers I, II and III


August 2010

Yellow indicates Change Since March


August 2010


August 2010

FDOT Costing Tool Examples

Project Area Description Constr. Cost Estimate

Rural New 2L Undivided Road w/ 5’ Paved Shoulder

$4,524,370 per Centerline Mile

Urban Widen 2L to 4L w/ 4’ Bike Lane & 6’ Sidewalk


Urban Widen 4L to 6L w/ 4’ Bike Lane & 6’ Sidewalk


Rural Diamond Interchange over Rural Divided Crossroad

$24,659,686 per Interchange


August 2010

Capital Operating

State Hwy. Projects $5,117 M

Local Road Projects $2,031 M

Bus Transit Projects $180 M $51.9 M*

Rail Transit Projects $1,824 M $21.4 M*

Bike/Ped/Trail Projects

Preliminary Cost Estimates (2010 $)

* Annual Operating Costs At Build-Out

polk transportation planning organization 2035 mobility vision plan august 2010 steering committee -...

Documents