local ranking factors - david mihm insidelocal presentation

23
1 © SEOmoz, Inc. 2014 David Mihm @davidmihm [email protected] 2014 Local Search Ranking Factors moz.com/local-search-ranking-factors

Upload: myles-anderson

Post on 04-Jul-2015

193 views

Category:

Internet


0 download

DESCRIPTION

David Mihm was a panelist on the InsideLocal webinar: "Local Ranking Factors discussed". David presented these slides to talk about the 2014 update to the Ranking Factors survey. The original InsideLocal webinar Slide Deck can be found here: http://www.slideshare.net/brightlocal/local-search-ranking-factors

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

11© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

David Mihm@davidmihm

[email protected]

2014 Local Search Ranking Factorsmoz.com/local-search-ranking-factors

Page 2: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

22© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

The Basics

Page 3: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

33© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Page 4: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

44© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Page 5: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

55© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Page 6: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

66© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

The Interesting Stuff

Page 7: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

77© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Page 8: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

88© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

???

Page 9: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

99© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Page 10: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

1010© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

“Convenience Store”

Tighter radius to location of search

for generic phrases.

Page 11: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

1111© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

“Convenience Store Portland”

Wider radius to location of search

for geomodified phrases.

Page 12: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

1212© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Page 13: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

1313© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Page 14: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

1414© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Page 15: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

1515© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Some Key Pigeon Insights

Page 16: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

1616© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Linda Buquet

Volatility caused by rotating datacenters.

I've been convinced for awhile now that Google is testing 2 -3

versions of Pigeon on different datacenters and is rotating

results. I say this in part, because all the Google datacenter IPs

I can find are still showing the old pre-Pigeon results and many

of the tools I use that send me screenshots or ordered pack

results are still showing the old algo ranking order as well. (As

are non US datacenters.)

Page 17: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

1717© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Casey Meraz

Strong domain or page authority.

Now you have local rankings from new G+ pages that have

almost no citations but do have a strong domain or page

authority. Many spammers have also taken advantage of this

linking to directory websites that are not their own to benefit

from the link juice.

Page 18: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

1818© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Darren Shaw

Anchor text.

If you have any doubts about the value of anchor text as a ranking

factor, check out Rand’s IMEC Lab test on anchor text. With the

introduction of the Pigeon, I believe anchor text is more important

than ever for local.

Page 19: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

1919© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

James Svoboda

Unsophisticated update.

They don't quite know what signals to filter out and devalue to

prevent bad G+ listings from showing up.

Page 20: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

2020© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Miriam EllisI don't really feel any factors have actually

become less important.

The main difference as I see it is that you may be getting less

mileage than you formerly did from good practices,

particularly in those results that have narrowed to smaller

packs or have shifted to favoring directories over individual

websites.

So, work that got you high visibility in 2013

may be getting you a little less of it in 2014.

Page 21: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

2121© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

Where We Might Be Headed

Page 22: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

2222© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

GMB SIGNALS

SEARCHERCENTROID

BEHAVIORAL

LINKS

ON-PAGE REVIEWS

CITATIONS

Algorithmic

Evolution

2008 – 10 Pack Introduction

2012 – Stability Post-Venice

2014 – Pigeon

Page 23: Local ranking factors - David Mihm InsideLocal presentation

2323© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014© SEOmoz, Inc. 2014

2008 – 10 Pack Introduction

2012 – Stability Post-Venice

2014 – Pigeon

GMB SIGNALS

SEARCHERCENTROID

BEHAVIORAL

LINKS

ON-PAGE REVIEWS

CITATIONS

2015+ – My Prediction

Algorithmic

Evolution