lighthouse macro report - 2013 - june

7/28/2019 Lighthouse Macro Report - 2013 - June

1/41

Lighthouse Investment Management

Macro Report - US economic indicators - June 2013 Page 1

Macro Report

Economic Indicators - USA - June 2013


2/41



Contents

Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 3

Lighthouse Recession Probability Index........................................................................................................ 4Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5

Fed Funds Rate ............................................................................................................................................ 10

Crude Oil ..................................................................................................................................................... 11

Construction: Building permits ................................................................................................................... 12

Employment: Non-Farm Payrolls ................................................................................................................ 13

Employment: Jobs Gained / Lost ................................................................................................................ 14

Employment: Jobs Gained/Lost (zoomed-in) .............................................................................................. 15

Employment: Hire and Fire ......................................................................................................................... 16

Employment: Initial and Revised Non-Farm Payrolls .................................................................................. 17

Employment: Full Time ............................................................................................................................... 18

Employment: Part Time .............................................................................................................................. 19

Employment: Full-Time to Part-Time Ratio ................................................................................................ 20

Employment: Labor Force Participation Rate ............................................................................................. 21

Consumer Sentiment: University of Michigan Survey ................................................................................ 22

Consumer Confidence: Conference Board Survey ...................................................................................... 23

Total Credit Outstanding ............................................................................................................................. 24

Retail Sales: Nominal .................................................................................................................................. 25

Retail Sales: Real ......................................................................................................................................... 26

Retail Sales: Real per-capita ........................................................................................................................ 27

Retail Sales Excluding Autos ........................................................................................................................ 28

Manufacturing: Hours Worked ................................................................................................................... 29

Manufacturing: Orders ............................................................................................................................... 30

Orders: Capital Goods ................................................................................................................................. 31

Manufacturing: Supplier Deliveries ............................................................................................................ 32

Electricity Usage .......................................................................................................................................... 33

Output: Electricity and Gas ......................................................................................................................... 34

Transportation: Miles Traveled ................................................................................................................... 35

Transportation: Gasoline Consumption ...................................................................................................... 36

Inflation: Implicit Price Deflator .................................................................................................................. 37

Inflation: Consumer Price Index .................................................................................................................. 38

Inflation Expectations ................................................................................................................................. 39Inflation Expectations and Stock Market .................................................................................................... 40


3/41



Summary

May 2013 highlights:

The likelihood of recession remained at 7% Output by electric and gas utilities, industrial electricity consumption, miles traveled and

gasoline supplied are the only variables showing recessionary tendencies

Real retail sales growth accelerated a tad, but slowing trend continues (esp. excl. autos)June 2013 trends:

Average monthly employment increased slightly to 191k from 176k per month - just enough tokeep the unemployment rate from rising.

The unemployment rate would be significantly higher if it wasn't for a declining labor forceparticipation rate.

CB Consumer Confidence improvedCONCLUSION: The probability for recession is low. However, economic growth remains very weak. Real

disposable incomes are not growing, and consumption is slowing. The recent rise in 10-year yields (1.6%

to 2.7%) and emerging market troubles (Brazil, China) could have negative consequences going forward.


4/41



Lighthouse Recession Probability Index


5/41



Introduction

Recessions are bad for company profits and hence stock prices. Knowing when an economic slow-down

looms can give important clues about asset class selection.

In the US, the beginning and the end points of recessions are declared by the NBER (National Bureau of

Economic Research). The NBER defines recessions as a "significant decline in economic activity spread

across the economy" (not, as often believed, as two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth).

The NBER takes it's time to date the beginning and the end of a down-turn; it announced the beginning

of the last recession (December 2007) only on December 1, 2008 - one year later. By that time, the S&P

500 Index had fallen from 1,575 points to 741. Similarly, the end of the recession in June 2009 was

announced on September 20, 2010 - more than one year later. By that time, the S&P 500 had already

soared from 940 points to 1,142.

Waiting for the NBER to declare beginning and end of recessions would have led to inferior investment

results (the NBER is correct in taking it's time, since many economic indicators are being revised multiple

times as preliminary data gets updated).

Traditional leading indicators include values such as the stock market and the slope of the yield curve.

However, the stock market does not seem very good at anticipating recessions, as the S&P 500 index

marked an all-time high in mid-October 2007, a mere six weeks before the most severe recession of the

last 8 decades began.

The yield curve has historically been a very good warning sign of recessions, as the Federal Reserve Bankwas forced to increase short-term rates in order to cool an overheating economy (thereby triggering a

recession). However, with short-term interest rates near zero for the foreseeable future, the yield curve

could only invert if long-term yields dipped into negative territory. While not entirely impossible

(negative yields for up to 2 year maturities have been observed in German, Swiss, Danish and other

government bond markets) it is very unlikely to happen in US Treasuries. Therefore, the slope of the US

yield curve is unlikely to give any hints about a recession occurring under ZIRP (zero-interest-rate-

policy).

Indicators published by other institutions, such as ECRI (Economic Cycle Research Institute), are

proprietary and not transparent, giving investors only the choice to "believe-it-or-leave-it".

The Conference Board Leading Indicator includes questionable values such as the S&P 500 Index, the

slope of the US yield curve and M2 money supply (which we have found to have little correlation with

economic cycles).

As most recessions last rarely longer than a year, the economy usually had already exited a recession by

the time the NBER declared it to be in one.


6/41



Revisions to GDP growth render it useless for investment purposes; On August 28, 2008 (already 8

months into the "great recession"), Q2 2008 GDP growth was revised upwards from an initial +1.9% to

+3.3%, triggering a 2% stock market rally. Later, growth was revised down to 1.3%, with the following

quarters delivering -3.7%, -9.2% and -5.4% (quarter-on-quarter, annualized). The S&P 500 Index didn't

regain the level attained that day for another 2 1/2 years.

Finding a reliable indicator for identifying recessions "real-time" would already be a great improvement

over waiting for the NBER.

Over the past 50 years, every recession was easily explained by two factors: oil and the Fed.

Unfortunately, this does not have to be the case going forward. Due to impotence of monetary policy at

the lower zero bound and rapidly increasing government debt the Fed might not be able to raise rates in

the foreseeable future. A recession might hence happen without prior tightening by the Fed.

We looked at many indicators from every angle; most had to be smoothed to cancel out short-term

"noise" in order to prevent false signals (we use 3-months moving averages).

Some indicators do not reveal useful signals unless you look at decline from recent peaks. Other data

needs to be trend adjusted (number of miles driven, for example, benefits from rising number of cars

and population).

The table on the following page shows indicators we have tested. Our criteria:

false positives (calling for a recession when there was none) false negatives (missed a recession) confidence it will work in the future and lead / lag time


7/41



No two recessions are the same. Trigger levels can be too strict (missing some recessions) or too lose

(giving too many false positives). We therefore created a range. The lower ("strict") boundary is the level

necessary to avoid false positives; the upper ("lenient") boundary is the level necessary to catch all

recessions. A high-quality indicator will have a narrow range, and recessions will be called with high

confidence. An indicator at the upper boundary will be awarded a 50% probability, increasing towards

100% at the lower boundary.

The overall "Lighthouse Recession Probability Indicator" (LRPI) is a weighted mean of individual

indicators. High confidence and timeliness of signal have been awarded higher weights (maximum: 3)

then those with low confidence or tardiness (minimum: 1). On the following page you see the LRPI since

1971, predicting every recession (assumed once 40%-50% probability is exceeded).

The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis publishes a recession probability indicator by Chauvet / Piger

(black line). It is based on four inputs (non-farm payrolls, industrial production, real personal income and

real manufacturing and trade sales). However, the most recent data point for Chauvet/Piger is usually

three months old, while LRPI is constantly updated (1 months old data).

You can see that LRPI shows first warnings signs much earlier than Chauvet/Piger.

In a recent response to a blog post, Chauvet clarified their indicator calls for a recession only "after

exceeding 80% for a couple of months". Additionally, their indicator is "smoothed" as the raw data canreach 70% (2003/4) without being followed by a recession. Their indicator initially showed a recession

probability of 20% for August 2012, only to be revised down to 1.7% six months later.


8/41


9/41


10/41



Fed Funds Rate

The US central bank ("Fed") increased interest rates ahead of each of the last 9 recessions. The black line

shows the absolute level of the Fed Funds rate; the blue line the increase from the prior post-recession

low. An increase between 2 and 4.5 percentage points from the previous low preceded every recession

since 1954.

Recessions are shaded in gray. Yellow dots indicate the beginning of a recession; green dots the end.

The absolute level (black line) is usually on the right-hand scale, while percentage changes (blue line) are

on the left-hand scale. Negative absolute numbers should be ignored as they are merely needed for

better formatting.

This indicator has a double weighting in the Lighthouse Recession Probability Indicator.


11/41



Crude Oil

An increase in the price of crude oil of 75% to 100% preceded five out of the last six recessions. Close call in March 2011 and February 2012. Currently not a red flag. Crude oil would have to rise above $110/barrel in order to trigger an early warning. This indicator has a triple weighting in the LRPI


12/41


13/41



Employment: Non-Farm Payrolls

The number of people on "payroll", or employed, is a good proxy for the health of the economy. You can

see the long "valleys" of lost payrolls after recent recessions compared to earlier ones. A decline of more

than 1% from previous peak payroll level indicates a recession. There have been no misses and no false

positives; even the "tricky" back-to-back recessions in 1980 and 1982 have been called correctly by this

indicator.

However, not all jobs are equal; only 47% of all working-age Americans have full-time jobs. Since 2007,

six million full-time jobs have been lost, but 2.5 million part-time jobs gained. Part-time jobs often come

without "benefits" such as health insurance. From peak employment (Q1 2008) to Q1 2010 1.2 million"higher-" wage jobs (median hourly wage $21-54) have been lost; in the subsequent 2 years only 0.8

million have been recreated. While almost 4 million mid-wage jobs ($14-21) have been lost, only 0.9m

have reappeared. Among lower wage jobs ($7-$14), 1.3 million have been lost, but 2 million gained.

This indicator has a triple weighting in the LRPI.


14/41



Employment: Jobs Gained / Lost

Current monthly payroll growth of 191,000 (12 months average) indicates zero probability of recession.


15/41



Employment: Jobs Gained/Lost (zoomed-in)

June payroll data was better (+195,000) than expected (+165,000) May has been revised upwards by 20,000 However, it should be noted that the margin of error is around 100,000, and revisions can be up

to 300,000


16/41


17/41


18/41



Employment: Full Time

The overall employment picture may be misleading, as higher paying full-time jobs are usuallybeing replaced with part-time jobs during a recession.

Full-time employment growth (year-over-year) slowed down to 1.2% (from +1.7% in theprevious month) - a number which historically was often associated with recessions.

Part-time jobs usually come without healthcare benefits, forcing employees to cover their ownmedical expenses (leaving less money for consumption).


19/41


20/41



Employment: Full-Time to Part-Time Ratio

The number of full-time employees used to be more than five times the number of part-timeemployees

In each recession, full-time employees are replaced by part-timers The ratio has not recovered in a meaningful way since the 'great recession'


21/41



Employment: Labor Force Participation Rate

The US unemployment rate is declining - but not so much due to employment growth than adecline in the 'labor force participation rate' (people with jobs relative to people who could

potentially work).

Many have exhausted their unemployment benefits, have left the workforce and are notcounted as unemployed.

Large numbers have applied for disability insurance, removing those folks permanently from thelabor market (as opposed to unemployment, which usually is temporary).

Economic growth depends on decent increases in employment and real incomes - none of whichis occurring.

Given low savings, increased consumption is possible only through credit expansion, leading torising indebtedness. This trend is unsustainable, but encouraged thanks to very low interest

rates.


22/41



Consumer Sentiment: University of Michigan Survey

The University of Michigan, together with Thompson-Reuters, conducts more than 500telephone interviews twice a month to gauge consumer sentiment, with a reference point from

1964 set to 100. A preliminary mid-month survey is followed up by a final one towards the end

of the month.

The indicator had one false positive (2005) and one miss (1981; the 1980-1981 recessions wereback-to-back, so let's not be too harsh about that).

A decline of 25%+ from previous peak indicates a recession. 2011 was a close call. The June reading (84.1) was the second-highest since July 2007. This indicator has a triple weighting in the LRPI and does currently not deliver any warning signs.


23/41



Consumer Confidence: Conference Board Survey

The Conference Board, an independent business membership and research association,conducts a survey of consumer confidence by mailing out surveys to more than 3,000 randomly

selected households. The cut-off date for a preliminary number is the 18th of the months. The

final number includes all surveys returned after that date.

The indicator had two false positives (1992, 2003), but it did catch all recessions including theones in 1981/2 and 2001 (difficult for a lot of other indicators).

2011 was a "close call". Consumer Confidence in June increased to 81.4 (from 74.3 in the prior month), the highest since

January 2008.

This indicator has a double weighting in the LRPI and currently does not raise any red flags.


24/41



Total Credit Outstanding

Most recessions have been accompanied by a reduction in the growth of debt. But, for the first time in

60 years, debt has actually shrunk in 2009. A meager 2% reduction caused a massive recession. The

classic question of chicken and egg comes to mind: did the recession cause debt to shrink or did

shrinking debt induce a recession?

I have included the 1987 stock market crash (red triangle). A dramatic revelation dawns: economic

growth is dependent on credit (debt) growth; without additional debt, growth is impossible.

Unfortunately, data becomes available only once every quarter, with the latest data often many months

old. To ensure timeliness for our LRPI we had to exclude this measure, however present it here forinformational purposes.

In Q1 2013, TCMDO was growing at a $3.1 trillion rate over the last 8 quarters (versus 2.8 trillion in Q4).

TCMDO-to-GDP has increased to 357% (Q4'12: 356%, Q3: 353%, Q2: 354%, previous peak was 385% in

Q1'09). Year-over-year growth accelerated slightly to 3.6% (from 3.4%) - still far below the past peak

(10.6% in Q3 2007, when the S&P 500 hit its previous all-time-high of 1,575).


25/41


26/41



Retail Sales: Real

Real retail sales (volumes) have only recently reached their pre-recession level The rate of growth continues to slow down No recession signal currently This indicator has a triple weight in the LRPI


27/41



Retail Sales: Real per-capita

Real per-capita retails sales are still 5% below their pre-recession peak The rate of growth continues to slow down (1.7%) No recession signal


28/41



Retail Sales Excluding Autos

The growth in nominal retail sales excluding autos has reached 100% recession probability Auto sales continue to benefit from very low interest rates, abundant credit and deep-subprime

used-car loans

In Q4 2012, 45% of all car financings were subprime (FICO score


29/41



Manufacturing: Hours Worked

Companies prefer to reduce employee's working hours rather than firing them straight away A drop in average weekly working hours in the manufacturing sector of 2% or more indicates a

recession (except for 1996)

According to "hours worked", the US economy is still sailing smoothly This indicator carries a double weighting in the LRPI


30/41



Manufacturing: Orders

The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) regularly asks company executives about orders,sales, inventories etc.

A level of 50 indicates "unchanged" (economy stagnates). This indicator delivered one false positive (1989). The ISM new orders index has been hovering around 50 for a while. This indicator carries double weighting in the LRPI and currently does not give a warning sign.


31/41



Orders: Capital Goods

Defense and aircraft orders are lumpy and distort trends, so we exclude them here. We have"medium" confidence in this indicator due to limited historic data. The "red zone" has been set

at -5% to 0%.

May orders came in at $68.5bn - the second-highest level since April 2008. However, defense and aircraft orders are more than twice as much as the rest. Any cuts in

defense spending and problems with Boeing's 787 model affect total orders, with repercussions

for many suppliers. So I wouldn't get too excited about the non-defense ex-aircraft data.

This indicator carries a single weighting in the LRPI and currently does not give a recessionwarning.


32/41



Manufacturing: Supplier Deliveries

Multiple false positives (1985, 1989, 1995, 1998, 2005) muddy the water. Therefore, this indicator has been slapped with "low" confidence and a corresponding single

weighting.

Recent surveys hovered around the 50-point mark. The current reading suggests no growth in manufacturing supplier deliveries, but does not give a

recession warning.


33/41



Electricity Usage

If you run a business you need electricity Weather can have an impact as electricity use in the US peaks in summer due to air conditioning If electricity usage drops by 1% or more, it's a recession Limited historic data, but no misses and no false positives Currently indicating a 94% likelihood of recession "Electricity usage" carries a single weighting in the LRPI


34/41



Output: Electricity and Gas

Electricity production should be linked to economic growth This indicator, unfortunately, had many false positives (1983, 1992, 1997, 2006), so confidence

is "medium"

Setting the trigger lower than -0.5% would eliminate false positives, but make you also misssome recessions

Recent data has seen quite some revisions of up to 2.5% magnitude Electricity production suggests we are in a recession with 100% likelihood The indicator carries a single weighting in the LRPI


35/41



Transportation: Miles Traveled

The US population grows by 2.25m people (0.7%) per annum, so traffic increases constantly. If total

miles driven grow less than 0.1% versus its own trend, you are likely to be in a recession (the

unemployed drive less).

The 2001 recession was missed. This indicator says we had a recession in 2011 (which is theoretically

possible - we might not know it yet). The prolonged decline in miles traveled since 2007 is puzzling; the

decline being deeper than the back-to-back recession 1980/81. Online shopping, car pooling and work-

from-home jobs might have contributed to this trend.

Unfortunately, data is made available only with a time lag of three months. This, combined with lower

confidence, made us exclude this indicator from the LRPI. In March, historic data has been revised going

back for years, denting confidence in this indicator further.


36/41



Transportation: Gasoline Consumption

Cars need gas, and gas needs to be delivered to gas stations Inventory effects are unlikely because of high turnover "Low" confidence because of false positive (1996) and limited historic data The harsh decline in 2012 is puzzling, but recovered since March 2012 This indicator is currently giving a 56% likelihood of recession

This indicator is related to "miles driven", confirming trends on one hand, but being redundant on the

other. It has therefore been excluded from LRPI.


37/41



Inflation: Implicit Price Deflator

The implicit price deflator is derived from the quarterly GDP report by comparing the current-dollar value of personal consumption expenditures (PCE) to its chained-value series

The Federal Reserve prefers this variable over the official consumer price index (CPI) Increasing nominal yields combined with slowing inflation lead to higher real yields - a

nightmare for the Fed

Inflation expectations, too, are falling The Fed might have no choice but to reverse course and abolish its plans to 'taper off' bond

purchases ("quantitative easing") towards the end of 2013


38/41



Inflation: Consumer Price Index

Headline CPI-U ("consumer price index for urban consumers") is currently rising at a seasonallyadjusted rate of 1.4% (previously: 1.1%).

Core CPI-U (excluding effects from food and energy prices) is currently rising at a seasonallyadjusted rate of 1.7% (previously 1.7%) .


39/41



Inflation Expectations

Real yield = nominal yield minus inflation. Resolving the equation for inflation you get:inflation = nominal yield minus real yield

We use Treasury bonds for nominal yields, and TIPS (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) forreal yield. The break-even rate of inflation is the rate at which it does not matter if you bought

Treasury bonds or TIPS. The resulting implied inflation rates for over the next 5 (red), 10 (blue)

and 30 (black) years are printed in above chart.

If you know the average rate over 10 years, and for the first 5 years of those 10 years, you canderive the expected rate of inflation for years 6 to 10 (green).

The "expected" rate of inflation is nota forecast; it may or may not come true. Marketexpectations change.

Changes in the expected rate of inflation are of interest due to a high correlation (over 75% untilmid-February 2012) to changes in the S&P 500 Index (see next page).


40/41



Inflation Expectations and Stock Market

The current data point (red) is the farthest away from the regression line since the beginning of2012

Assuming historic correlations remain valid, either the stock market is over-extended or inflationexpectations would have to catch up substantially.

The expected value for the S&P 500 given current inflation expectations is around 1,360(currently 1,630).

Any questions or feedback highly welcome.

[email protected]


41/41


Disclaimer: It should be self-evident this is for informational and educational purposes only and shall not be

taken as investment advice. Nothing posted here shall constitute a solicitation, recommendation or

endorsement to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. You shouldn't be surprised that

accounts managed by Lighthouse Investment Management or the author may have financial interests in any

instruments mentioned in these posts. We may buy or sell at any time, might not disclose those actions andwe might not necessarily disclose updated information should we discover a fault with our analysis. The

author has no obligation to update any information posted here. We reserve the right to make investment

decisions inconsistent with the views expressed here. We can't make any representations or warranties as to

the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the information posted. All liability for errors, omissions,

misinterpretation or misuse of any information posted is excluded.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

All clients have their own individual accounts held at an independent, well-known brokerage company (US)

or bank (Europe). This institution executes trades, sends confirms and statements. Lighthouse Investment

Management does not take custody of any client assets.

lighthouse macro report - 2013 - june

Documents