iii-v nanoelectronics for energy efficient...
TRANSCRIPT
III-V Nanoelectronics for Energy Efficient Information Processing
PhD Students: Vinay Saripalli (Intel), Dheeraj Mohata, Bijesh R., Mike Barth, Ashkar Ali
Suman Datta
Electrical Engineering Materials Research Institute (MRI)
March 01, 2012
Energy Efficiency
• Near threshold voltage (NTV) computing achieves highest energy efficiency
• Can III-V nanoelectronics be employed to enhance transistor characteristics targeted for NTV computing Variable precision floating point unit processor
on 32nm CMOS (Source Intel: ISSCC 2012)
Emerging Nano Devices
• Leverage emerging Nano devices for advanced, extended and beyond CMOS for energy efficiency
Ge / InGaAs / InSb FINFETs
Enhanced CMOS
Extended CMOS
Beyond CMOS
State of the Art CMOS
NTV Computing Devices
1E12 1E13101
102
103
Si PMOS
Hole
Mob
ility
[cm
2 /Vs]
Carrier Density [/cm2]
Ga0.6In0.4Sb QW Layers
7x
Stanford, NRL (IEDM '09)
1E12 1E13101
102
103
104
105
Si NMOS
Elec
tron
Mob
ility
[cm
2 /Vs]
Carrier Density [/cm2]
InAs1-xSbx QW Layers
60x
Penn State, NRL (IEDM '10)x=0.2-0.3
Antimonide III-V CMOS
InAs1-xSbx QW electron mobility ~ 13,000 cm2/Vs (60x over Si)
GaxIn1-xSb QW hole mobility ~ 850 cm2/Vs (7x over Si)
Promising for low power, high-performance III-V CMOS logic
InGaSb QW
S.I. GaAs Nucleation and Buffer Layer
Al0.8Ga0.2Sb buffer(Unified Buffer for NMOS and PMOS)
InAsSb QW
High-κ
GS D
NMOS
High-κ
GS D
PMOS
Isol
atio
nInAlSb Barrier InAlSb Barrier
InAlSb Barrier InAlSb Barrier
4o(100) Offcut Si Substrate
ILD
Shared Metamorphic Buffer
M. Hudait, S. Datta, R. Chau et al.; US Patent No. 7429747
Antimonide NMOS and PMOS have similar lattice constants
Can be grown on the same buffer Promising for III-V CMOS
Outline
• Device Layer Design
• Dielectric Integration Strategy
• Device Transport Characterization
– Long Channel Mobility
– Short Channel Velocity
• Gate Stack Scalability
– Quantum Capacitance Effects
• Conclusions Substrate
Mismatch Accommodation Layer
High Mobility QW
Bottom Barrier Layer
δ-doped Barrier
Wor
k Fu
nctio
n En
gine
ered
S/D
M
etal
High-k gate oxide
Work Function Engineered Gate Metal
Wor
k Fu
nctio
n En
gine
ered
S/D
M
etal
Device Architecture
for Ultra-low VDD Logic
Quantum Well Device Layer Design
InAs0.8Sb0.2 quantum well device layer was modified to incorporate an ultra-thin GaSb cap layer for dielectric integration
Any parallel channel in the device ?
GaSb Cap: 2.5 nm
Al0.8In0.2Sb Barrier: 9 nm
InAs0.8Sb0.2 Channel: 12 nm
Al0.8Ga.2Sb Buffer 5nm
Al0.8Ga.2Sb Buffer
GaAs Substrate
QW Device Layers
1.5 µm
Device layers grown by Brian R. Bennett, NRL
Quantitative Mobility Spectrum Analysis
Higher conductivity peak corresponds to InAs0.8Sb0.2 QW
No dominant parasitic channel in the device layers
10 20 30 40-0.8
-0.4
0.0
0.4
0.8
EFE1
Al0.
8In 0
.2SbGaS
b
Ener
gy [e
V]
Distance [nm]
Al0.
8In 0
.2Sb InAs
0.8S
b 0.2
Al0.
8Ga 0
.2Sb
Te δ−doping
E0
0.3eV
(a)
10-6
10-4
10-2
10-6
10-4
10-2
102 103 104 105 10610-6
10-4
10-2
electrons holes
300K2DEG
2DEG
2DEG 200K
Cond
uctiv
ity [/Ω
]
77K
Mobility [cm2/Vs]
Hall Mobility and Scattering Analysis
10 100
104
105
106
µInterface Charge
µModel µExperiment
µPOPµADP
µInterface Roughness
µRemote Ionized Impurity
µAlloy
Mob
ility
[cm
2 /Vs]
Temperature [K]
Electron mobility of 13,000 cm2/Vs at 300K (Ns=2.2 x 1012 /cm2)
Coulomb scattering due to interface charge limits transport
Interf
ace Cha
rge
Polar
Optical
Phon
on
Remote
Ioniz
ed Im
purity
Acou
stic P
hono
n
Alloy
Disorde
r
Interf
ace Rou
ghne
ss0
10
20
30
40
50
% C
ontri
butio
n to
1/µ T=300K
Ultra-thin GaSb Cap Layer on InAlSb Barrier Enables High-κ Dielectric Integration
High Al content barrier oxidizes in air giving rise to surface pitting during surface preparation prior to high-κ deposition
GaSb cap layer on InAlSb barrier enables high-κ dielectric integration
Surface clean on device layers with InAlSb surface
Surface clean on device layers with GaSb cap on InAlSb barrier
300 nm
0.40.60.81.01.2 75kHz to 2MHz
300K
Capa
cita
nce
[µFc
m-2]
300K
-2 -1 0 1 20.40.60.81.01.2
250K
Gate Voltage [V]( )
-2 -1 0 1 2
250K
n-GaSb MOSCAPs
Gate (Pd/Au)
n-GaSb (Te doping)
ND=1x1018 /cm3
5nm Al2O3
Low Temp Plasma Enhanced ALD
Plasma Enhanced ALD MOSCAPs show good Fermi level modulation
High Temp ALD
p-GaSb MOSCAPs
0.40.60.81.01.2 75kHz to 2MHz
300K
Capa
cita
nce
[µFc
m-2]
300K
-2 -1 0 1 20.40.60.81.01.2
200K
Gate Voltage [V]-2 -1 0 1 2
200K
Gate (Pd/Au)
p-GaSb (unintentional doping)
NA=1x1018 /cm3
5nm Al2O3
High Temp ALD Low Temp Plasma Enhanced ALD
Plasma Enhanced ALD MOSCAPs show good Fermi level modulation
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.81012
1013
D it [/c
m2 /e
V]
E-EV [eV]
Interface State Density (Dit)
High Temp ALD
Low Temp PEALD
Dit extracted from multi-temperature CV/GV analysis of n&p GaSb MOSCAPs
Low Dit near EV of GaSb for PEALD Good Sb QW NMOS turn off
High Dit towards midgap Likely affect drive current
Fermi Level movement at high-κ/GaSb interface for Sb QW MOSFET ON-OFF
10 20 30-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
GaSb
Oxid
e
E2
E1
BufferQW Barrier
EF
EV
Ener
gy [e
V]
Distance [nm]
EC
Sb QW MOSFET ON-State
10 20 30-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
GaSb
Oxid
e
E2
E1
BufferQW Barrier
EF
EV
Ener
gy [e
V]
Distance [nm]
EC
Sb QW MOSFET OFF-State
-1 0 10.51.01.52.02.53.0
Capa
cita
nce
[µF/
cm2 ]
75 kHz to 2MHz
-1 0 1
Gate Voltage [V]
Pd / (5 nm HfO2-1 nm Al2O3) / p & n-GaSb
Scaled Gate Stack Low Temperature ALD
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.81012
1013
ALD Al2O3/HfO2
TOXE=1.4 nm
EV EC
E-EV [eV]D it [
/cm
2 /eV]
PEALD Al2O3
TOXE=3.1 nm
Al2O3 / HfO2 bilayer stack enables gate dielectric scaling
1nm Al2O3/10nm HfO2
S.I. GaAs Substrate
Al0.8Ga0.2Sb Buffer : 1.5μm
InAs0.8Sb0.2 QW:12nm
GaSb : 1 nmAl0.8In0.2Sb Barrier : 9nmTe δ-doping
Pd/P
t/Au
D
rain
Pd/P
t/Au
So
urce
1nm Al2O3/10nm HfO2
S.I. GaAs Substrate
Al0.8Ga0.2Sb Buffer : 1.5μm
InAs0.8Sb0.2 QW:12nm
GaSb : 1 nmAl0.8In0.2Sb Barrier : 9nmTe δ-doping
Pd/P
t/Au
D
rain
Pd/P
t/Au
So
urce
Pd/Au Gate
Sb NMOSFET Device Fabrication As Grown Device Layers
S.I. GaAs Substrate
Al0.8Ga0.2Sb Buffer : 1.5μm
InAs0.8Sb0.2 QW:12nm
GaSb : 2.5nmAl0.8In0.2Sb Barrier : 9nmTe δ-doping
S.I. GaAs Substrate
Al0.8Ga0.2Sb Buffer : 1.5μm
InAs0.8Sb0.2 QW:12nm
GaSb : 2.5nmAl0.8In0.2Sb Barrier : 9nmTe δ-doping
Pd/P
t/Au
D
rain
Pd/P
t/Au
So
urce
Pd/Pt/Au Source-Drain Contacts
and Device Isolation
Gate Stack Processing (HCl based surface clean)
Gate Patterning E-beam Lithography
Final Processed Device
1nm Al2O3/10nm HfO2
S.I. GaAs Substrate
Al0.8Ga0.2Sb Buffer : 1.5μm
InAs0.8Sb0.2 QW:12nm
GaSb : 1 nmAl0.8In0.2Sb Barrier : 9nmTe δ-doping
Pd/P
t/Au
D
rain
Pd/P
t/Au
So
urce
Pd/Au Gate
SEM Micrograph of Sb NMOSFET
Long and short channel Sb NMOSFETs fabricated with composite high-κ gate stack(1 nm Al2O3 / 10 nm HfO2 on GaSb)
Gates defined using electron beam lithography LG = 150 nm–20 µm
Pd/Au Gate LG= 150 nm
Devices Fabricated at the Penn State Nanofabrication Facility
-2 -1 010-1
100
101
102
Gm a
t VDS
=0.5
V [µ
S/µm
]
VDS=0.1V,0.5VLG=5µm
I D & I G
[µA/µm
]
Gate Voltage [V]0
100
200
-2 -1 0100
101
102
I D &
I G [µ
A/µm
]
VDS=0.1V,0.5VLG=450 nm
Gate Voltage [V]0
200
400
600
Gm a
t VDS
=0.5
V [µ
S/µm
]
-2 -1 0100
101
102
VDS=0.1V,0.5VLG=150nm
Gate Voltage [V]0
200
400
600
Gm a
t VDS
=0.5
V [µ
S/µm
]
I D & I G
[µA/µm
]
Transfer Characteristics of Sb NMOS
Good ION-IOFF for long LG devices
Gm,peak= 400 µS/µm at VDS=0.5V for LG= 450 nm (Rext limits short channel performance)
The sub-threshold characteristics degrade as LG is scaled due to non-optimized barrier and oxide thickness (TOXE=4.6 nm)
o Need to scale the barrier, oxide and quantum well thickness
0.0 0.5 1.00100200300400500600 VGS Start=0.5V
Step=-0.25VLG=150nm
I D[µ
A/µ
m]
Drain Voltage [V]0.0 0.5 1.00
100200300400500
I D[µ
A/µ
m]
VGS Start=0.5VStep=-0.25VLG=450nm
Drain Voltage [V]0.0 0.5 1.00
50
100
150
200 VGS Start=0.5VStep=-0.25VLG=5µm
I D[µ
A/µ
m]
Drain Voltage [V]
Output Characteristics of Sb NMOS
Excellent saturation (at low VG) in the output characteristics for long LG device
IDSAT of 450 µA/µm at 0.75 V VDS for 150 nm LG device
Short channel ION limited by contact resistance
Long Channel Transport
Record high electron drift mobility of 6,000 cm2/Vs at 2x1012 /cm2 of Ns
Drift mobility lower than measured Hall mobility of QW layers by 2.2x
o Measured C-V overestimates the charge density due to Dit
o Scattering from high-κ phonons or surface charge at oxide interface
1011 1012
103
104
In0.53Ga0.47As MOSFET
InAsSbQW MOSFET
Drift
Mob
ility
[cm
2 /Vs]
Carrier Density [/cm-2]
Hall MobilityAs Grown
Si/SiO2
S. Takagi, IEDM 2011
15x 3x
Long Channel Transport
Stretch-out in measured C-V compared to simulated C-V is due to Dit
~20% enhancement in mobility at ns=2x1012 /cm2 after correcting the sheet charge density for trapped charge
Pulsed I-V measurements will reduce charge trapping in the Dit
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Capa
citan
ce [µ
F/cm
2 ]
Gate Voltage [V]
Measured Simulated
LG=20µmFreq.=2MHz
1011 1012
4000
6000
8000100001200014000 Hall Mobility
As Grown
Corrected for Dit
Extracted usingMeasured C-V
Dr
ift M
obili
ty [c
m2 /V
s]Carrier Density [/cm-2]
-2 -1 0100
101
102
VDS=0.1V,0.75VLG=450 nm
I D [µ
A/µ
m]
Gate Voltage [V]
, DC, Pulsed
(2µs)
0.0 0.5 1.00100200300400500
15%
35%
VG-VT=1.25V
VG-VT=0.75V
Closed - Pulsed (2µs)Open - DC
I D[µA
/µm
]
Drain Voltage [V]
VG-VT=0.25V31%
LG=450nm
Pulsed I-V
Expected time constant for trapping / de-trapping ~ 0.5 - 1µs
Pulsed I-V characteristics shows significant enhancement in ION and ION/IOFF over DC due to reduced charge trapping from Dit
o~35% ION enhancement at 0.75 V gate overdrive
τ = Rtunnel x Cit τ ~ 0.5 – 2 µs
Gate
VG VD VS
ID Oxide GaSb
Barrier Channel Barrier
JG
Peak extrinsic RF gm improves by 30% compared to DC Gm
RF and Pulsed Measurements
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.00100200300400500 30% DC
Pulsed (2µs) RF
Ex
trins
ic G m [µ
S/µm
]
VG-VT[V]
LG=450nmVDS=0.75V
221 0 Re[ ]mRF g Y
ω ==
Effective source injection velocity (veff) determines the performance in short channel devices
RF measurements are used to extract charge in short channel devices
Short Channel Device Characterization: Virtual Source Injection Velocity Extraction
A. Khakifirooz et al., TED, 2008 M. Lundstrom, EDL 1997
1 1 1(0 )eff T effv v Eµ += +
2*
BT
k Tvmπ
=
EC
veff ID/W = Qinj x veff
0 L x
VG VD VS
RD RS Qinj
ID
Source
Gate Drain
A simplified MOSFET small signal equivalent circuit was used to model the measured s-parameters of Sb NMOSFET
Excellent fit between measured and modeled data is obtained for all 4 s-parameters obtained till 50 GHz
Short Channel Device Characterization: RF Measurements and S-parameter Modeling
LG = 150 nm, WG=2x33 µm VGS-VT=0.6 V, VDS=0.75 V
0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0
-0.2j
0.2j
-0.5j
0.5j
-1.0j
1.0j
-2.0j
2.0j
-5.0j
5.0j
Measured Modeled
S112*S22
10*S12
S21
100 MHz to 50 GHz
150 nm LG Sb NMOS at 0.75 V VDS and 0.6 V overdrive demonstrates
o 2.7 x 107 cm/s veff
Highest veff among III-V MOSFETs
0.01 0.1 10
1
2
3
InGaAs NMOSVDS=0.5V [2]
Sb NMOS; VDS=0.75V
Strained Si [1]
v ef
f [x
107 cm
/s]
Gate Length [µm]
Si NMOS [1] VDS = 1.1-1.3V
Short Channel Transport
[1] D. Antoniadis et al., IEDM 2008 [2] M. Radosavljevic et al.; IEDM 2009
1.5x 4x
4x higher than Si NMOS at 1.0-1.2 V VDD
1.5x higher than InGaAs NMOS at 0.5 V VDS
E-Mode Sb NMOS
Scaled device architecture increases the gate field to QW coupling improving device electrostatics
o SS = 150 mV/dec for E-mode for LG=5 µm (350 mV/dec for D-mode)
High access resistance limits the short channel device performance
o Need self-aligned device architecture
-2 -1 0 110-2
10-1
100
101
102
E-Mode150m
V/de
c
VDS=0.05V,0.5VLG=5µm
I D [µA
/µm
]
Gate Voltage [V]
350m
V/de
c
D-Mode
-2 -1 0 110-2
10-1
100
101
102
E-Mode
250m
V/de
c
VDS=0.05V,0.5VLG=150 nm
I D [µA
/µm
]Gate Voltage [V]
700mV/dec
D-Mode
IOFF
VT
veff =2.7 x 107 cm/s for D-Mode , 1.8 x 107 cm/s for D-Mode at VDS=0.75 V
Lower veff for E-Mode devices due to the lower Hall Mobility of as grown samples:
E-Mode : 13000 cm2/Vs at ns=2.2x1012 /cm2 ,
D-Mode : 5,500 cm2/Vs at ns=1.8x1012 /cm2
Short Channel Performance D-Mode vs E-Mode Sb NMOSFETs
0.01 0.1 10
1
2
3
E-Mode
D-Mode
Strained Si [1]
v eff [
x 10
7 cm/s
]
Gate Length [µm]
Si NMOS [1] VDS = 1.1-1.3V [1] D. Antoniadis
et al.,IEDM 2008
Drive Current Expectation from Sb NMOSFET for 0.5V VDD Logic
Assume 5nm Sb Quantum well
ION = q x ns x veff
= (1.6 x 10-19 C ) x (3.5 x 1012 /cm2)x (2.7 x 107 cm/s)
Experimentally demonstrated
Projected based on experiments
= 1.5 mA/µm
ION = ? at VG-VT = 2/3 x VDD ~ 0.3V
Assuming RS as in Si (~ 80 Ω.µm): ION = 960 µA/µm at VG-VT~ 0.3V
Key Challenges: Maintaining veff for very thin channels Obtaining optimum RS at required footprint Acceptable short channel effects
Conclusions
Demonstrated antimonide (Sb) QW MOSFETs with integrated high-k gate dielectric for low VDD logic application
Sb NMOSETs exhibit:
o Electron drift mobility of 6000 cm2/Vs at ns=2 x 1012 /cm2
o Short channel (150nm LG) source injection velocity (veff) of 2.7x107 cm/s
o Extrinsic fT - LG product of 18GHz.um at VDS=0.75 V, VG-VT=0.6 V
Benchmarked Sb NMOSFET figures of merit to standard strained Si NMOS
o 15x higher drift mobility at ns=2x1012 /cm2
o 4x higher veff for VD=0.75 V at comparable LG
o 2x higher fT - LG product
Energy Efficiency Computing Devices
Steep Switching in Tunnel FET
Switching slope in TFETs can be less than kT/q
TFET: SS < kT/q possible
MOSFET: SS >= kT/q
VG
IOFF
IOFF
ID
Gate
Gate
i-channel P++
Source N+
Drain
high-k
high-k
Tb
TOX
EFS EFD
Band-pass filter
Filled States
Empty States
Band-gap EFC
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.510-1110-910-710-510-310-1101103
InSb TFET InAs TFET In0.53Ga0.47As TFET Si TFET Si MOSFET
Drai
n Cu
rren
t, I DS
[µA/µm
]
Gate Voltage, VGS [V]
VDS=0.5V
60mV/dec
Low Ion in HomJ TFETs
Silicon
In0.53Ga0.47As
InAs
InSb IOFF ION
Eb
Wb
Both ION and IOFF increase with reducing band-gap
LG=32nm EOT=0.5nm Tb=7nm
Simulations Gate
Gate
i-channel P++
Source N+
Drain
high-k
high-k
Tb
TOX
Simulation
100 101 102 103101103105107109
1011
Si MOSFET
Si TFET
In0.53Ga0.47As TFET
InAs TFET
InSb TFET
ION [µA/µm]
I ON/
I OFF
VCC=0.5V
Can HomJ TFET beat MOSFET?
-None of the HomJ TFETs are superior at higher ION -Need higher ION/IOFF @ MOSFET like ION
Simulations
Tunnel Junction Engineering
with Staggered Hetero-junction
Maximize stagger to get maximum enhancement in ION
HomJ TFET
Eg
Eg Source
channel
))(( 5.1
exp beffET βα −
High Stagger HetJ TFET
∆Ec
Eg
Eg Source
channel
cgbeff EEE ∆−≈
Tunneling Device Architecture
TUD
Ultrathin geometry for robust electrostatics
Drain-Gate underlap to minimize ambi-polar leakage
Gate
Gate
i-channel P++
Source N+
Drain
high-k
high-k
Tb
TOX
LG
Electric Field
Abrupt tunneling junction
Source Channel
λ2 λ1
III-V / high-k interface with low Dit
Source
Channel Source
Channel
Drain
Vertical Tunnel FET
Mo
i N+
Gate
ILD
Drain
Gate
III-V / high-k interface with low Dit
Pillar based ultrathin Tb
In situ doped Molecular Beam Epitaxially grown
junctions
Drain-Gate underlap structure
Vertical Nano-pillar TFET 3. Dry etch Mo and InGaAs
6. ILD and Drain Contact 5. Gate and Source contact 4. ALD high-k after wet etch
2. Cr/Ti hard etch mask 1. Blanket deposit Mo
1nmAl2O3/3.5nmHfO2
39
Tunnel Barrier Engineering
39
Reduce Eg
Mod. Stagger H
igh
Stag
ger
N+
i
P++ In0.53Ga0.47As
Mo high-k
Pt ILD
Au Pd
Ti
Homo-junction and Hetero-junction Tunnel FETs
Cross-section TEM image of the fabricated devices
350nm
450nm
Ti
350nm
Large Eg HomJ High HetJ TFET
-0.50 -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.750102030405060
Drai
n Cu
rren
t, I DS
[ µA/µm
]
Drain Voltage, VDS [V]
Vgs=0V to 2.5Vat steps of 0.5V
-0.50 -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.750
20
40
60
Drai
n Cu
rren
t, I DS
[µA/µm
]
Drain Voltage, VDS [V]
Vgs=0V to 2.5Vat steps of 0.5V
-0.50 -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.750
50
100
150
200
Drai
n Cu
rren
t, I DS
[ µA/µm
]Drain Voltage, VDS [V]
Vgs=0V to 2.5V at steps of 0.5V
Measured Id-Vd @ 300K
Mod. Stagger (ION ↑ 2.5x)
With High HetJ TFET, ION increases by 660%
-0.50 -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.750
5
10
15
20
25
Drai
n Cu
rren
t, I DS
[µA/µm
]
Drain Voltage, VDS [V]
Vgs=0V to 2.5Vsteps of 0.5V
Mod. Stagg. HetJ
Small Eg HomJ
Large Eg HomJ
High Stagg. HetJ
Lg=100nm EOT=1.5nm
Lg=100nm EOT=1.5nm
Lg=150nm EOT=1.5nm Lg=150nm
EOT=1.5nm
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.510-410-310-210-1100101102
Drai
n Cu
rren
t, I DS
[ µA/µm
]
Gate Voltage, VGS [V]
Vds=50mV Vds=250mV Vds=500mV
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.510-610-510-410-310-210-1100101102
Drai
n Cu
rren
t, I DS
[µA/µm
]
Gate Voltage, VGS [V]
VDS=50mVVDS=250mV VDS=500mV
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.010-610-510-410-310-210-1100101102
Drai
n Cu
rren
t, I DS
[µA/µm
]
Gate Voltage, VGS [V]
VDS=500mV VDS=250mV VDS=50mV
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.510-610-510-410-310-210-1100101102
Drai
n Cu
rren
t, Id
[µA/µm
]
Gate Voltage,VGS [V]
VDS=50mV VDS=250mV VDS=500mV
Measured Id-Vg @ 300K
Experimental IOFF is increasing with stagger
Mod. Stagg. HetJ
Small Eg HomJ
Large Eg HomJ
High Stagg. HetJ
Lg=100nm EOT=1.5nm
Lg=100nm EOT=1.5nm
Lg=150nm EOT=1.5nm
Lg=150nm EOT=1.5nm
10-8 10-6 10-4 10-2 100 102050
100150200250300350
60mV/dec
SS (m
V/d
ecad
e)Drain Current, IDS [µA/µm]
77K 300K
15.4mV/dec
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.010-1010-810-610-410-2100102
BTBTTAT
T=300K T=77K
Drai
n Cu
rren
t, I DS
[µA/µm
]
Gate Voltage, VGS [V]
VDS=50mV,500mV
SRH
Temperature Dependent Switching Slope (SS)
Measured Id-Vg Switching Slope
-Switching slope improves at low temperature -Quality of high-k/ III-V interface needs investigation
Source
Channel
-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00.000.250.500.751.001.251.501.75
f=75kHzDue to Dit
1nmAl2O3/3.5nmHfO2
CET=2.3nm
Cap
acita
nce,
C [µ
F/cm
2 ]
Gate Voltage, VGS [V]
Ideal
n-In0.53Ga0.47As
-Mid-gap states have characteristic response time between 1ms and 1µs -Can we avoid gap state assisted tunneling using pulsed I-V?
High-k/Channel Interface Quality
Measured
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.510-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4 Simulations DC pulsed (tr=600ns) pulsed (tr=200ns)
VDS=300mVDrai
n Cu
rren
t [A]
VGS-VON [V]
Vcc
+
- D
S
G
50Ω
To Oscilloscope
Switching slope improves with ramp rate and appears approaching ideal swing
R1
Gain=100,000
***Pulsed IV measurements conducted at NIST (John Suehle)
Can we improve SS using Ultrafast Pulsed I-V Technique?
tr
10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-50
50100150200250300
Simulations DC Pulsed (tr=600ns) Pulsed (tr=200ns)
SS [m
v/de
c]Drain Current [A]
60mV/dec
VDS=0.3V
Can We Improve SS using Ultrafast Pulsed I-V Technique?
Point switching slope approaches kT/q @ 300K
***Pulsed IV measurements conducted at NIST (John Suehle)
Vcc
+
- D
S
G
50Ω
To Oscilloscope
R1
Gain=100,000
tr
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7100
101
102
103
High HetJ
Small Eg HomJ
Mod. Stagg. Hetj
Drai
n Cu
rren
t, I DS
[µA/µm
]
Drain Voltage, VDS [V]
Strained Si MOSFET (VT=0.2V)
Large Eg Homj
Tunnel FET vs MOSFET
For Vcc less than 300mV, BTBT can potentially deliver MOSFET like on current
Experimental (EOT=1.5nm, Tb=200nm)
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.010-210-1100101102103
Large Eg HomJ Small Eg HomJ Mod. HetJ High HetJ
Measured Simulations
Drai
n Cu
rren
t, I DS
[µA/µm
]
VGS-VON [V]
VDS=0.5V
EOT=1.5nmTP=200nm
Modeling Measured Id-Vg
Junction Ebeff (eV)
mR (mO)
In0.53Ga0.47As (Large Eg homJ)
0.74 0.023
In0.7Ga0.3As (Small Eg homJ)
0.59 0.019
GaAs0.5Sb0.5/In0.53Ga0.47As (Moderate stagger hetJ)
0.5 0.025
GaAs0.35Sb0.65/In0.7Ga0.3As (High stagger hetJ)
0.25 0.022
-Further geometry scaling required in order to reduce Vcc
Projection
Need for Extremely Staggered / Nearly Broken InAs/GaAs0.1Sb0.9 tunnel junction to replace MOSFET @ Vcc=300mV
100 101 102 103100
102
104
106
Strained SiMOSFET
Large Eg Nearlybroken
I ON
/I OFF
ION [µA/µm]
VCC=0.3V
High HetJ
Simulations (EOT=0.5nm, Tb=7nm, LG=32nm)
101 102 103100
102
104
106
108
VCC=0.5V
I ON/
I OFF
ION [µA/µm]
Large EgNearlybrokenHigh HetJ
Strained SiMOSFET
Si
New
Mat
eria
ls
Electrostatics
Planar Tri-Gate Gate-All-Around
Motivation
SiGe
1D strained QW nanowire
New opportunity: 0D QD
III-V
Vout(mV)
Vin(mV)
300
0 300
sub 500mV CMOS Logic
Vg(V)
0 0.1 0.2 0
10
Id (nA)
sub 250mV BDD Logic
Classical III-V MuQFET Fabrication
QW epitaxy Fin definition and etching (BCl3/Ar)
S/D contact (Au/Ge/Ni)
High-K deposition (1nm Al2O3+3.5nmHfO2)
Metal gate stack (Au/Pd)
S/D Contact Opening
QW
52
Fabrication of MuQFETs
• 40 nm wide electron waveguides fabricated using top-down pattern and etch process • Split Gate architecture allows going from classical FET mode to Coulomb Blockade
mode
InP 2 nm
In0.52Al0.48As 2nm
In0.53Ga0.47As 14nm
In0.52Al0.48As 2nm
δ-doping 2E12 cm-2
InAlAs virtual substrate
L. Lu, V. Saripalli, V. Narayanan S. Datta, IEDM, Dec 2011
Gate
Classical III-V MuQFET Characterization
• SS is improved to 120mV/decade with scaling fin width to 10nm.
WFIN decreases
WFIN =10nm WFIN =40nm WFIN =100nm WFIN =500nm
WFIN decreases
WFIN =10nm WFIN =40nm WFIN =100nm WFIN =500nm
54
Ballistic Mean Free Path
Mob
ility
(cm
2 /V-
sec)
Room temperature mean free path ~ 120 nm extracted for the fabricated structures
Gate length dependence of extracted mobility reflects quasi-ballistic transport
Sheet charge density NS (cm-2)
300K 300K
Non-Classical (NC) MuQFET
SG 80nm
40nm
• The split gate (SG) bias determines the strength of coupling between S/D contact and channel.
• Top control gate (CG) controlling the channel potential may result in coulomb oscillation.
CG SG
source
Drain
Control gate (CG)
CG Split Gate (SG) High-K
Beyond CMOS
With VDD approaching 4kBT (~100mV), the CMOS inverter gain drops In BDD logic, path switching function and passive transmission of
messenger do not require devices with “transfer gain” and “current drivability”
Need to program tree with open, short paths and actual decision nodes
Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) Logic CMOS Logic
open
short
Beyond CMOS
• ASSIST will explore reconfigurable Single Electron Transistor device architecture and implement low voltage combinational logic circuits with such elements
Reconfigurable SET
Demonstrated reconfigurable, split gate single electron transistor (SET) exhibiting open, short and Coulomb Blockade mode of operation
Source: L. Lu, V. Narayanan, S. Datta IEDM, Dec 2011 Supported by NSF
Summary
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.00.81.01.21.41.61.82.02.22.4
Tran
sisto
r Gat
e Dela
y (n
orm
alize
d)
Operating Voltage (V)
Planar Si MOSFET Silicon MuGFET InGaAs MuQFET III-V TFET SET
0.1 1 Switching Energy [x10-16 J]
• III-V nanoelectronics provides a promising landscape for energy efficient information processing, but needs serious $$ investment
0.01 x10-16 J
Si Planar (32nm)
Si MuGFET (14/22nm)
III-V MuGFET
III-V Tunnel FET
III-V SET
60
New Nano Facility at Penn State
www.mri.psu.edu/facilities/Nanofab
Device Research Conference, DRC 2012 June 18-20 ; Abstract Submission Deadline: March 07, 2012
61
Datta Research Group
www.mri.psu.edu/facilities/Nanofab