iic bahrain telecom and media forum 2009

Upload: ictqatar

Post on 30-May-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 IIC Bahrain Telecom and Media Forum 2009

    1/10

    May5, 2009

    Building High Speed Connectivity:

    Policy Development Considerations

  • 8/9/2019 IIC Bahrain Telecom and Media Forum 2009

    2/10

    High speed connectivity is considered to be an importantobjective by many governments

    Opening Remarks

    High speed connectivity is high on the agenda of many governments

    Rapid technological and application innovations are introducing new services that demand greaterbandwidth capacity to perform multimedia and other data-related functions (e.g. IP-based TV); Suchservices are being introduced into the norm of developed societies

    Many services are increasingly supporting society and business needs, e.g. online conferencing, onlineeducation, online medical advice - reducing the barriers of distances and therefore enhancingknowledge and information exchanges

    Governments believe new ICT-based services are valuable to their societies and economies as a whole;many believe all citizens should have equal access to capacity and speed

    Connectivity can be through fixed or wireless networks; fixed broadband has attracted much attentionand prioritization in a number of countries

    Regulatory attention has traditionally made a clear distinction between fixed and wireless businesses;

    this is beginning to fade with next generation regulations but full convergence or acceptance ofcomplimentary use of technologies still needs to progress

    Government engagement has intensified in the recent economic downturn, but any form ofengagement needs to be measured to ensure the ongoing development and sustainability ofcompetition, as well as to minimize economic inefficiencies

    New business models involving government engagement in high capacity network deployment areemerging

  • 8/9/2019 IIC Bahrain Telecom and Media Forum 2009

    3/10

    Telecom Sector: Development Drivers

    Broadband

    2G/3G 802.xxAccess

    PacketMobile

    Network

    CircuitMobile

    Network

    IP NetworkIP/TV

    Dynamic market where multiplefacility- and service- based service

    providers compete on offering

    innovative services and operatingdifferent networks

    Service ProviderDevelopment

    Technology andService Deployment

    Progressive environment thatfacilitates the development and

    deployment of advancedtechnologies and services

    More ProductiveUsers and Higher

    Quality of Life

    National WelfareAdvancement

    Advanced nation with hightechnology and service adoption

    leading to greater sector andeconomic growth

    Its a common view that many governments place importanceon telecoms to advance social and economic development

  • 8/9/2019 IIC Bahrain Telecom and Media Forum 2009

    4/10

    New technologies like NGN are heralding the convergence ofmultimedia services over a unified platform

    NGN and Convergence

    NGN

    Voice

    IP

    Different Access Modes

    Video

    InternetAccess

    EntertainmentApplications

    InteractiveServices

    Guides/Directories

    NGNs Enabling Convergence

  • 8/9/2019 IIC Bahrain Telecom and Media Forum 2009

    5/10

    and such services are increasing bandwidth demandworldwide

    Competition and introduction of new low-cost technologies are driving new services andnetwork use

    International voice traffic (circuit switched and IP) is growing and prices are declining

    Penetration of broadband is increasing as it becomes more affordable in the region

    Driven by the wide adoption of broadband, media applications are becoming more popularthus requiring more bandwidth. Such applications include video streaming, videoconferencing, Internet radio, etc.

    Source: : DRG/Telegeography

    12.4

    8.6

    5.7

    3.6

    2.41.8

    2006 20072002 20042003 2005

    Worldwide International Bandwidth Demand Growth

    (Tbps, 2002 - 2007)

    CAGR:

    47%

    Worldwide International Bandwidth Demand Growth

    (Tbps, 2002 - 2007)

    CAGR:

    47%

    Cumulative Bandwidth Demand(Gbps, 2007 - 2011F)

    382

    559

    802

    1,107

    1,480

    2007 2008F 2009F 2010F 2011F

    CAGR:31%

    Regional Growth:

    Growth

    Drivers

    Bandwidth Demand

  • 8/9/2019 IIC Bahrain Telecom and Media Forum 2009

    6/10

    Text

    Generic Government Policy Drivers

    High speed connectivity government policies can be drivenby a number of reasons

    Address Capacity Demand

    Capacity demand may notbeadequately met, hinderingbusinesses as well as private

    users enjoyment of new services

    Likely to arise in under-competitive markets

    Ensure Leadership

    National positional among peersconsidered important- Supports attracting

    investment into the country- Supports exports (image of

    country contributes to trust inthe services/goods)

    Cost Efficiencies

    Some country markets measuredmight find high costinefficiencies in:

    - Network duplication- Network replacement

    Create Employment

    Major economic downturn maybe countered by capital injectioninto significant projects withexternal benefits to localcommunities or the country at

    large

    NationalIndustrial

    Policy

  • 8/9/2019 IIC Bahrain Telecom and Media Forum 2009

    7/10

    2009 economic stimulusprogram, $0.81BNwasallocated to governmentinvestment agencyKhazanah to facilitate andimprove broadbandinfrastructure via itssubsidiary

    $0.65BN has also beenprovided to governmentregulator MCMC tofacilitate broadbandcommunity centers inrural areas and achieve50% populationpenetration rate by 2010

    Singapore authoritieshave granted in 2008 upto $0.525BN to aconsortium to deploy afiber network that willaccess 60% of buildings by2010 and 95% 2012Wholesale prices forbroadband fiber access areset to $10 for residentsand $35 for businessconnections

    Recently announced government funding underlines theimportance of ICT and broadband for national economies

    Government Funding - Country Case Studies

    2009 US economy stimulusprogram, the AmericanRecovery and ReinvestmentAct includes $7.2BN for abroadband rollout thatincreases speed andpenetration ($4.7BN innational high-speedbroadband network,$2.5BN in rural areasbroadband)

    EU Commission proposesto target 1BN to extendand upgrade high-speedinternet in ruralcommunities to provideaccess to 30% of thepopulationEU members areadditionally providingeconomic stimulus forbroadband rollouts suchas UK, Portugal, Germany

    In

    itiatives

    Rural Broadband

    High-Speed Broadband Economic DownturnMitigation

    Des

    cription

    US EU Malaysia Singapore

  • 8/9/2019 IIC Bahrain Telecom and Media Forum 2009

    8/10Low Risk High Risk

    Government roles may vary - directional, engaged ordetached - and each involves risks of economic efficiencies

    MarketRisk

    Description

    Government Role

    Politically determined need and notnecessarily based on economicrationale; requirement imposed onselected industry providers

    Costs are responsibility of affectedproviders; risk of financial failure

    Politically determined need, buteconomic rational is more-likelyespecially if funding comes from thegovernment; private sectorwillingness to engage

    Costs shared or taken on by willingproviders

    Industry identifies actual needsbased on market demands and costsof investment

    High likelihood of efficiencies, butinequality in services - key question:is there always real need for equality(e.g. in data access speed etc.)?

    Potential for market failure in someuneconomical areas

    Directional Engaged Detached

    Government assumes social-economicneeds of the country- Usually politically motivated- Typically requirements imposed are

    symmetrical across society Prescribe coverage

    - USO - universal service obligation -initiatives require rollout of network

    types (e.g. fiber, 3G) in specific areas;areas that are at risk of not beingaddressed (low density, rural areas, lowincome areas)

    - Specific USO obligation on a dominantoperator

    - Obligation in mobile ( or possibly otherwireless) licenses

    Prescribe criteria (e.g. speed) Government has no financial onus

    Government assumes social - economicneeds of the country, but market failuremay have been identified/proven

    Develop and initiate government program- Public Private Partnership (PPP): Seed

    money; Build Operate Transfer (BOT)

    Establish new infrastructure company

    Financial onus may be shared between

    government and industry

    Leave to providers in the market to identifyneeds, deploy and develop infrastructureand services accordingly- Services may vary according to market

    segmentation, including geographicalneeds (i.e. asymmetrical requirementsapplied)

    Financial onus on industry, but decisions

    based on economic costs and investmentrationale, not policy

  • 8/9/2019 IIC Bahrain Telecom and Media Forum 2009

    9/10

    Any government involvement in the sector, however,should be less prescriptive and allow operating flexibility

    TechnologyNeutrality

    Complimentary

    Operators should choose the technology that best suits their businessplan

    - Regulators should not prejudge and prescribe technologies, howevershould require interoperability in order to guard against anti-

    competitive behavior through technology-based barriers to entry- Spectrum use should, where possible, be technology neutral

    Operating Flexibility: Technology Use

    Regulators should consider adopting more network neutrality.- Fixed and wireless convergence should be acceptable, allowing

    fixed operators the flexibility in deploying cables and wireless

    infrastructure (e.g. fiber optics and WiMAX) to deliver broadbandservices

    - It may be impractical and unrealistic to expect full nationaldeployment / coverage of cables

    - Emphasis should be on service access rather than the means ofservice delivery

  • 8/9/2019 IIC Bahrain Telecom and Media Forum 2009

    10/10

    While continuing to advance market competition, capitalintense initiatives might need support - handle with care

    Ensure regulatory practices enable providers flexibility to utilize the choice of availabletechnologies and means to deliver connectivity

    Balance the political benefits of universal equality with the practical need and subsequentcosts of access to connectivity speed

    Engagement by authorities in the sector should be as an enabler and not as a participant (e.g.new teleco) - i.e. offering financial support and PPP over entering as a state operator (it failedbefore)

    Ensure providers have the choice and fair opportunity to participate in governmentsponsored schemes/initiatives and funding

    Encourage winners over weak providers, without being bias in decision-making or otherwise

    demonstrating favoritism Ensure market liberalization continues and anti-competitive practices are addressed

    Concluding Remarks