Dive into the details of our web applicationsLevel: Intermediate - Advanced

All slides are available @

slideshare.net/heka1

Andrew Maxwell

About Me:

● GoPro, Inc.

● 10+ years in the industry

● I manage the front-end web-app team

Contact Info:

● Google+: Andrew Maxwell

● LinkedIn: Andrew Maxwell

● Twitter: @amaxwell02

● Github: amaxwell01

● Instagram: amaxwell01

● andrewcmaxwell.com

Gopro Web Applications

GoPro: Case Study

● Goals of our applications

● Development setup

● Coding process

● Problems & solutions

● What’s next?

Goals for our applications

Goals for our applications

1. Follow the Unix philosophy

“Do one thing and do it well”

2. All apps are isolated from each other and are only connected through the login application

Goals for our applications

3. All Node applications are based off of our web-base framework

Goals for our applications

4. All apps must run in docker

● Single docker image for all environments (local, QA, staging and production)

● Every deploy gets its own tagged image with code

Goals for our applications

5. All apps MUST be deployed independently

● No app should block one another from being deployed

● Move Fast

Goals for our applications

6. Easy roll backs thanks to every deploy getting its own tagged version of a docker image

● Send an update notice to our cluster to roll back to the previous tag

● Removing the impact on our customers

Goals for our applications

Goals for our applications

7. Follow rolling release train to ship consistently, but only what’s ready

Development setup

Development setupIsomorphic App Setup

Start from SCRATCH

● Start a new project

● Clone from web-base to the name of your new project

$git clone [gopro-web-base].git gopro-web-login

Development setup

● Hello World

Development setup

Development setup

Update our configuration files

● app-config.js

● gopro.json

● package.json

● docker-compose.yml

One command to run them all

Development setup

$MAKE

We can get you coding in 10 minutes:

$git clone gopro-web-login

$cd gopro-web-login

$make

Development setup

● $make install

○ Mapped to NPM install

● $make build

○ mapped to gulp build

■ runs webpack with node

● $make lint

○ gulp eslint

● $make test

○ Mapped to gulp test

■ runs Jest / Jasmine unit tests

● $make server

○ node babel.server.js

● $make dev

○ runs make install, make build, make

watch

● $make

○ make dev

All apps run with 7 simple commands:

Development setup

Build Process with Node and Gulp

Development setup

&

Quality and standards in our builds

Development setup

Watch files for changes

Development setup

Coding process

All components are react components

Lint our code

Coding process

Check docker

● Every time we make a change to our server setup, we make sure that we run our changes locally in docker

$docker-compose run

Coding process

Push the changes up to Github and fires off our build

1. All features get their own branch

2. Circle CI automatically kicks off our build process for the new branch

3. Circle CI creates a tags a new docker image with the built code

4. Each branch can be tested in isolation with a unique sub-domain

Coding process

Create pull requests

1. Create a new PR for the changes

a. Must be a single commit or as little of commits as possible

b. Must include the ticket number as the first part of the commit title

2. Circle CI run’s our build process and adds badges to the Github PR

3. Code is reviewed by team

4. Original developer merges their own code and close the PR

Coding process

Pro’s & Con’s

Pro’s of isomorphic applications:

● One language (JavaScript)

● Shared components

● Faster rendering time

● Less moving parts

● Easy deployments

● Fast development

● Better S.E.O

● Running similar, but not identical, API requests on the server/client

● Unit tests require some HTML to be tested (blurs the line of unit vs E2E test)

● Some routes set in Hapi, some in React Router

● Debugging API requests can be tricky depending on if it is done on the client,

the server, or both

● 2 forms of logging

Con’s of isomorphic applications:

Problems & Solutions

Problems & Solutions:

Debugging API requests on the client / server

Set up better logging using Bunyan and moved to isomorphic fetch

Problems & Solutions:

React Router API changes

Updated web-base and changed how the API was used

Problems & Solutions:

Making reusable components

Made all applications manage state, not the reusable component

Problems & Solutions:

Lib-sass not staying up to date with Node changes

Node.js foundation - All is well again

Problems & Solutions:

30+ second startup times because Babel6 doesn’t play nice with NPM 2

Changed to a new version of Node.js with NPM 3

Problems & Solutions:

Building multiple apps at once and keeping them in sync

Set up Web-base, our internal “desired” collection of frameworks and configuration

Problems & Solutions:

100+ feature based deployments a day, leaving around unused docker images on server

A bi-hourly cleaner to remove unused docker images

What’s next?

1. Continue improving our web-base framework.

2. Improve feature-base branch development to work better with our API’s

3. Create a CLI-tool to help start new projects, create components, add tests, etc.

4. More tests!

Let’s dive into code

Questions?

All slides are available @ slideshare.net/heka1

Thank You!

● https://gopro.com

● https://www.docker.com

● https://nodejs.org/en

● http://hapijs.com

● http://gulpjs.com

● https://github.com/dlmanning/gulp-sass

● http://eslint.org

● https://babeljs.io

● https://facebook.github.io/react

● https://webpack.github.io

● https://github.com/trentm/node-bunyan

Links: