global economic crisis and brüning‘s government, 1929-32 lecture 11 17 april 2012
DESCRIPTION
HIST2133. The Weimar Republic through Documents, 1918-1933. Global economic crisis and Brüning‘s government, 1929-32 Lecture 11 17 April 2012. The Crisis of Democracy, 1929-32: 3 factors. 1) Mass unemployment (≥ 6 million) + 2) Art. 53 of Weimar Constitution - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Global economic crisis
and Brüning‘s government, 1929-32
Lecture 11
17 April 2012
HIST2133.The Weimar Republic through Documents,1918-1933
The Crisis of Democracy, 1929-32:3 factors
1) Mass unemployment (≥ 6 million)+
2) Art. 53 of Weimar Constitution→ ‘Presidential government under Brüning► First step into an authoritarian regime► Weimar democracy already at stake
+3) NSDAP election results
= Successive dissolution of Weimar Republic
‘Black Friday’: 25 Oct 1929
• Collapse of NY Stock Exchange due to long US overproduction
• US credits to G redrawn + US protective customs • Depression tendency in G accelerated
= G industrial production decreased to 1903-4 levels
► Rapid decline of salaries & living standards
► Massive unemployment: 1,2 Mill. (1929) → 6 Mill. (Jan 1932)
Results
• Fall of Chancellor Müller’s SPD & DVP government over economic & social issues (Mar 1930)
► ‘Self-acquittal’ of SPD from power
• New CP Brüning government as ‘presidential cabinet’ appointed by Reich President (art. 53)
► Hindenburg’s concession to Brüning to make use of art. 48 (state of emergency) if needed
= Major turn in WR politics + power
Reichstag election, Sep 1930
Decisive break-through of NSDAP:• High voters’ turn out
• Decline of DNVP
• Voters from lower middle-class + various other strata of society
• Financial subsidies from big industry much less important than Hitler’s own charisma
NSDAP in Reichstag elections
1928 - 1930: • SPD 29,8 - 24,5 % • NSDAP 2,6 - 18,3
% • KPD 10,6 - 13,1 %• DNVP 14,2 - 7,0
%• DVP 8,7 - 4,5 %• DDP 4,9 - 3,8 %
July – November 1932• NSDAP 37,3 - 33,1 %• SPD 21,6 – 20,4 %• KPD 14,3 – 16,9 %• DNVP 5,9 – 8,3 %• DVP 1,2 – 1,9 %• DDP 1,0 – 1,0 %
NSDAP after re-founding in 1925
• Munich branch effectively party headquarter• Hitler’s claim for absolute leadership + personal
orders to sub-leaders ☺ ≠ Strasser’s bureaucratic structure ☻
• Hitler’s concept of SA as party force ☺ ≠ Röhm’s concept as military force ☻
• 30-36 districts lead by Gauleiter (district leaders) + local party branches leaders
• Special party organisations + professional associations as wider mass networks
NSDAP characteristics• Internal symbols of Hitler’s charismatic rule:
A) Super-power positionB) Embodiment of heroism + sacred mission +
greatness + devotion C) Decision-making as ‘action and example’ without formal limitations
• External symbols of Führer cult: A) Heil Hitler’, Hitler Youth, propaganda (Goebbels)B) Sub-leaders in ‘blood brotherhood’ with feudal
loyalty to HitlerC) Führer myth → ‘Hitler Party’
NSDAP agitation + propaganda
• Rites + symbols, parades of NS organisations• Rallies: 1926 Weimar, since 1927 Nuremberg• Election campaigns: Mass rallies, flags, films, Hitler’s flights
through Germany
= Omnipresence, actions, dynamism, technical modernity, H’s charisma → Movement of the ‘Young-and-fresh’
= Flag consecrations, martyr cult for fallen Nazis, oaths for loyalty + sacrifice, terror + attacks on political
enemies → ‘Fighting Movement’
► Actionist ‘movement’ style + irrational heroism ≠ rational discourse, compromise, pluralism, democracy
Hitler’s Way to Power:8 explanations
• Political: Versailles Treaty• Economic: Economic crises• Institutional: Weimar constitution• Sociological: Lower middle class • Ideological: Authoritarian tradition• Marxist: Necessary crisis of capitalism• Mass psychology: Propaganda• Personality: Hitler
Brüning government Oct 1930-May 1932
• Over 40% of Reichstag deputies from NSDAP + KPD + DNVP after Sep 1930 elections
• No coalition possible between pro-Republican parties due to ideological divisions
• No new election wished due to anticipated further rise of NSDAP + KPD + DNVP
→ Toleration of Brüning government by SPD: “Brüning the lesser evil than Hitler”
Brüning’s deflation policy
• Strong cuts in government’s spending esp. in civil service
• Massive increase of + introduction of new taxes
→ To raise competitiveness of G products abroad
→ To demonstrate to Allies willingness to pay reparations
= Deflation policy with clearly foreign policy intentions
Results• After major bank crisis → G’s severe
financial crisis (spring 1931)☺ Final end of all reparations (Jun/Jul 1932)☻ No end of economic crisis
→ Deflation policy cuts government expenditures in economy + lowers buying-
power of people= Self-destructive mechanism ≠ J.M. Keynes’
idea of temporarily expanded public debts
Economic crisis 1931-2
• Huge unemployment• Decrease of unemployment subsidies• More people receive only welfare subsidies
= No active government plan to fight but only to manage crisis
► Strong decline of trust in government► Brüning’s public appeals no longer believed► Hopes faded for improvement of situation
Presidential elections 1932• Pro Hindenburg: SPD, Centre Party, BVP, DDP,
DVP (not DNVP)• No absolute majority in 1st round: 49,6% for
Hindenburg, 30,4% for Hitler• Absolute majority in 2nd round: 53% for Hindenburg,
36,9%
= Hindenburg regarded lacking support of DNVP as ‘personal humiliation’
→ Increasing lack-of-trust in Brüning’s political skills