class adulteration & evaluation

78

Upload: prathibha-vanitha

Post on 23-Jan-2017

212 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Class   adulteration & evaluation
Page 2: Class   adulteration & evaluation

AdulterationIt is a practice of substituting the original

crude drug partially or fully with other substances which is either free from or inferior in therapeutic and chemical properties or Addition of low grade or spoiled drugs or entirely different drug similar to that of original drug substituted with an intention of enhancement of profits.

Page 3: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Adulteration involves different conditions such as

• Deterioration, • Admixture, • Sophistication, • Substitution, • Inferiority, and • Spoilage.

Page 4: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• DETERIORATION is the impairment in the quality of a drug.

• ADMIXTURE is the addition of one article to another due to ignorance or carelessness, or by accident.

• SOPHISTICATON is the intentional or deliberate type of adulteration.

Page 5: Class   adulteration & evaluation

SUBSTITUTION occurs when totally different substance is added in place of original drug.

INFERIORITY refers to any sub-standard drug.

SPOILAGE deterioration due to the attack of microorganisms.

Page 6: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Adulteration may take place by two ways:

- Direct or intentional adulteration

- Indirect or unintentional adulteration

Page 7: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Indirect or unintentional adulteration

• Unintentional adulteration which sometimes occurs without bad intention of the manufacturer or supplier.

Sometimes in the absence of proper means of evaluation, an authentic drug partially or fully devoid of the active ingredients may enter the market.

• Factors such as geographical sources, growing conditions, processing, and storage are all factors that influence the quality of the drug.

Page 8: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Direct or intentional adulteration

• Direct or intentional adulteration is done intentionally which

usually includes practices in which an herbal drug is substituted

partially or fully with other inferior products.

• Due to morphological resemblance to the authentic herb, many

different inferior commercial varieties are used as adulterants.

• These may or may not have any chemical or therapeutic potential.

Substitution by “exhausted” drugs entails adulteration of the plant

material with the same plant material devoid of the active

constituents.

Page 9: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• This practice is most common in the case of volatile

oil-containing materials, where the dried exhausted

material resembles the original drug but is free of the

essential oils.

• Foreign matter such as other parts of the same plant

with no active ingredients, sand and stones,

manufactured artifacts, and synthetic inferior principles

are used as substitutes.

Page 10: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Generally the drugs are adulterated by substitution with sub-standard

commercial varieties, inferior drugs, or artificially manufactured commodities.

The following types of adulteration are common

1. SUBSTITUTION WITH SUB-STANDARD COMMERCIAL VARIETIES

2. SUBSTITUTION WITH SUPERFICIALLY SIMILAR INFERIOR DRUGS

3. SUBSTITUTION WITH ARTIFICIALLY MANUFACTURED

SUBSTANCES

Types of adulteration

Page 11: Class   adulteration & evaluation

4. SUBSTITUTION WITH EXHAUSTED DRUG

5. USE OF SYNTHETIC CHEMICALS

6. PRESENCE OF VEGETATIVE MATTER FROM THE

SAME PLANT

7. HARMFUL ADULTERANTS

8. ADULTERATION OF POWDERS

Page 12: Class   adulteration & evaluation

1. SUBSTITUTION WITH SUB-STANDARD COMMERCIAL

VARIETIES

• The adulterants here may resemble the original

crude drug in morphological, chemical, or

therapeutic characters, but are sub-standard in

nature and hence are cheaper in cost. This is a

rather most common practice of adulteration.

Page 13: Class   adulteration & evaluation

e.g. Strychnous nux-blanda or S.potatorum in place of S.nux-vomica,

Capsicum annuum in place of C.minimum,Indian senna is substituted with arabian senna

or dog senna, Medicinal ginger is substituted with inferior

varieties of African, Japanese, or Cochin ginger.

Page 14: Class   adulteration & evaluation

2. SUBSTITUTION WITH SUPERFICIALLY SIMILAR INFERIOR

DRUGS These inferior drugs used may or may not be having any chemical or

therapeutic value as that of original drug.

Due to their morphological resemblance to the authentic drug, they are

used as adulterants.

Examples

Belladonna leaves are substituted with Ailanthus leaves,

Saffron is admixed with dried flowers of Carthamus tinctorious, and

Bees wax is substituted with Japan wax.

Page 15: Class   adulteration & evaluation

3. SUBSTITUTION WITH ARTIFICIALLY MANUFACTURED

SUBSTANCES It has been also observed that substances artificially

prepared to resemble the original drug are used as

substitutes. This practice is followed for much costlier

drugs.

e.g., Compressed Chicory in place of coffee,

Yellow coloured paraffin wax for bees wax,

Properly cut and shaved basswood for nutmeg.

Page 16: Class   adulteration & evaluation

4. SUBSTITUTION WITH EXHAUSTED DRUG

• The same drug is admixed but is devoid of any medicinally

active constituents as they are already extracted out.

• This practice is more common in case of volatile oil

containing drugs like fennel, clove, coriander, caraway etc.

• Sometimes natural characters of exhausted drugs like

colour and taste are manipulated by adding other additives

and then it is substituted.

Page 17: Class   adulteration & evaluation

o e.g. Exhausted gentian made bitter with aloes,

oArtificial colouring of exhausted saffron, etc.

Page 18: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Besides these common practices, sometimes other

methods are also employed like use of synthetic

chemicals to enhance the natural character as in

case of

addition of benzyl benzoate to balsam of peru,

citral to citrus oils like oil of lemon and orange oil,

etc.

5. Use of synthetic chemicals

Page 19: Class   adulteration & evaluation

6. PRESENCE OF VEGETATIVE MATTER FROM THE SAME PLANT

• Sometimes, the other miniature plants growing along with

medicinal plants are admixed with the authentic drug, due to

their resembling colour, odour, and in some cases

constituents.

• The lower plants like moss, liverworts, and epiphytes

growing on bark portion are mixed with cascara or cinchona.

• The stem portions are mixed along with leaf drugs like

stramonium , lobelia and senna.

Page 20: Class   adulteration & evaluation

7. HARMFUL ADULTERANTS

o Sometimes the waste from the market are collected and admixed

with the authentic drug. This is particularly noticed for liquids or

unorganized drugs.

o The examples like pieces of amber coloured glass in colophony,

limestones in asafoetida, lead shot in opium, white oil in

coconut oil, cocoa butter mixed with stearin or paraffin.

o The addition of rodent feacal matter to cardamom seed is a very

harmful adulteration.

Page 21: Class   adulteration & evaluation

8. ADULTERATION OF POWDERS

Besides the entire drug, the powdered forms are frequently

found to be adulterated.

Examples

Dextrin in ipecacuanha,

Powered liquorice or gentian admixed with powdered olive

stones

Exhausted ginger powder in powdered colocynth or ginger.

Page 22: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Evaluation of Crude Drugs

• Evaluation of drug means confirmation of its identity and

determination of its quality and purity and detection of nature of

adulteration.

Types of Evaluation

• Organoleptic evaluation

• Microscopic evaluation

• Physical evaluation

• Chemical evaluation

• Biological evaluation

Page 23: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Organoleptic evaluation

It means evaluation of drug by the organs of sense (skin, eye, tongue, nose and ear) or macroscopic evaluation and it includes evaluation of drugs by

I. Color, II.Odor, III.Taste, IV.Size, V.ShapeVI. and special feature, like touch, texture etc.

Page 24: Class   adulteration & evaluation

It is the technique of qualitative evaluation based on the study of

morphological and sensory profile of whole drugs.

eg. The fractured surfaces in cinchona, quillia, cascara barks and

quassia wood are important characteristics.

Aromatic odour of umbelliferous fruits and sweet taste of

liquorice are the examples of this type of evaluation where odor

of drug depends upon the type and quality of odourous principles

(volatile oils) present.

Page 25: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• Shape of drug may be cylindrical (sarsapilla), subcylindrical

(podophyllum), conical (aconite), fusiform (jalap) etc, size

represent length, breadth, thickness, diameter etc.

• Color means external color which varies from white to brownish

black are important diagnostic characters.

• Taste is specific type of sensation felt by epithelial layer of

tongue. It may be acidic (sour), saline (salt like), saccharic

(sweetish), bitter or tasteless (possessing no taste).

Page 26: Class   adulteration & evaluation

The general appearance (external marking) of the crude drug often

indicates whether it is likely to comply with prescribed standard

like

furrows (alternate depression or valleys),

wrinkles (fine delicate furrows),

annulations (transverse rings),

fissures (splits),

nodules (rounded outgrowth),

scars (spot left after fall of leaves, stems or roots).

Page 27: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Microscopic evaluation

It involves detailed examination of the drug and

it can be used to identify the organized drugs by

their known histological characters.

It is mostly used for qualitative evaluation of

organized crude drugs in entire and powder

forms with help of microscope

Page 28: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• Qualitative microscopy

Using microscope detecting various cellular

tissues, trichomes, stomata, starch granules,

calcium oxalate crystals and aleurone grains are

some of important parameters which play

important role in identification of certain crude

drug.

Page 29: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• Quantitative microscopy

Quantitative aspects of microscopy includes

study of stomatal number and index, palisade

ratio, vein-islet number, size of starch grains,

length of fibers etc which play important role in

the identification of drug.

Page 30: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Qualitative microscopy

Stomata

There are several types of stomata, distinguished by the forms and arrangement of

the Surrounding cells (Subsidary cells), e.g.

(a) Anomocytic (Ranunculaceous) irregular celled: Digitalis

(b) Anisoytic (Cruciferous) unequal celled: Datura

(c) Diacytic (Caryophyllaceous) perpendicular celled: Mentha

(d) Paracytic (Rubiaceous) parallel celled: Senna

(e) Actioncytic: 4 or more subsidary cells,elongated radially to stomata- Mucaceae

(f) Cyclocytic: 4 or more subsidary cells,arranged in narrow ring around stomata-

Palmae

Page 31: Class   adulteration & evaluation
Page 32: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Trichomes

• Trichomes are divided and subdivided as follows-

(i) Covering Trichomes

(a) Unicellular Trichomes: Nux vomica, Cannabis

(b) Uniseriate Multicellular Unbranched Trichomes: Datura

(c) Biseriate Multicellular unbranched Trichomes: Calendula

officinalis

(d) Multiseriate Multicellular unbranched Trichomes: Male fern

(e) Multicellular branched Trichomes: Verbascum Thapsus

Page 33: Class   adulteration & evaluation

(ii) Glandular Trichomes

(a) Unicellular Glandular Trichomes: Vasaka

(b) Multicellular Glandular Trichomes: Digitalis

purpurea

(iii) Hydathode Trichomes: Piper betal

Page 34: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Quantitative Microscopy

It involves different parameters like

Palisade Ratio: It is defined as average number

of palisade cells beneath each epidermal cell.

e.g. Atropa belladonna (6-10),

Digitalis Lanata (2.5-6.5)

Page 35: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• Stomatal Number : It is defined as average number of

stomata per square millimeter area of epidermis.

e.g.: Atropa belladonna: {6.0-14-37.5 (Upper Surface), 62.5-93-

174 (lower Surface)}.

• Stomatal Index: It is the percentage which the number of

stomata forms to the total number of epidermal cells. It is

calculated by,

Page 36: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Where, S.I = Stomatal Index;

S = Number of stomata per unit area;

E = Number of Epidermal cells in the same unit area.

e.g. Atropa belladonna:- 2.3-3.9-10.5 (Upper Surface),

20.2 - 21.7 - 23.0 (Lower Surface)

Digitalis Purpurea - 1.6-2.7-4.0 (Upper Surface);

19.2- 25.2 (lower Surface).

Page 37: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Vein Islet: The small areas of green tissue outlined by the veinlets

are termed as vein islet.

• Vein Islet Number:

It is defined as average number of Vein Islet per square

millimeter of the leaf surface midway between midrib

and the margin.

i. Digitalis Lanata — 2.0-8.0

ii. Digitalis Purpure — 2.0-5.5

Page 38: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• Vein terminations are the ultimate free terminations of a

veinlet or branch of a vienlet.

Vein Termination Number:

It is defined as average number of Vein terminations per square

millimeter of the leaf surface midway between midrib and the

margin.

• Atropa belladonna — 6.3-10.3

• Atropa acuminate — 1.4-3.5

Page 39: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Physical evaluation

Physical constants are sometimes taken into consideration

to evaluate certain drugs.

These include

• moisture content,

• specific gravity,

• optical rotation,

Page 40: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• Refractive index,

• melting point,

• viscosity and

• solubility in different solvents.

Page 41: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• All these physical properties are useful in identification and

detection of constituents present in plant.

• Ash values

– Total ash

– Water soluble ash

– Acid insoluble ash

– Sulphated ash

• Fluorescence analysis

• Foreign matter

Page 42: Class   adulteration & evaluation
Page 43: Class   adulteration & evaluation
Page 44: Class   adulteration & evaluation
Page 45: Class   adulteration & evaluation
Page 46: Class   adulteration & evaluation
Page 47: Class   adulteration & evaluation
Page 48: Class   adulteration & evaluation
Page 49: Class   adulteration & evaluation
Page 50: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Determination of Total Ash• Incinerate about 2 to 3 g accurately weighed, of

the ground drug in a tarred platinum or silica dish at a temperature not exceeding 450ºC until free from carbon, cool and weigh. Calculate the percentage of ash with reference to the air-dried drug.

Page 51: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Drugs Total ash (% w/w)

Aloes Not more than 5 %

Ashoka Not more than 11%

Amla Not more than 7 %

Nutmeg Not more than 3 %

% Total ash value = Wt. of total ash

x 100 Wt. of crude drug taken

Page 52: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Acid insouble ash• Test measures the amount of silica present, especially as sand

siliceous earth.

• The obtained total ash was boiled with 25 ml of 2N HCl for 5 min.

The insoluble ash was collected on ash less filter and washed with

hot water. The insoluble ash was transferred into pre-weighed silica

crucible, ignited, cooled and weighed. The procedure was repeated

till the constant weight was obtained. The percentage of acid

insoluble ash was calculated with reference to the air dried drugs.

Page 53: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Drugs Acid insoluble ash (%w/w)

Agar Not more than 1.0

Amla Not more than 2.0

Bael Not more than 1.0

Wt. of acid insoluble ash% Acid insoluble ash value = x 100

Wt. of crude drug taken

Page 54: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Determination of water soluble ash value

• The total ash obtained was boiled with 25 ml of chloroform water

for five min. The insoluble matter was collected on a ash less filter

paper & and washed with hot water. The insoluble ash was

transferred into pre-weighed silica crucible, ignited for 15 min at a

temperature not exceeding 450°C, cooled and weighed. The

weight of the insoluble matter was subtracted from the weight of

total ash. The percentage of water soluble ash was calculated with

reference to the air-dried sample drug.

Page 55: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Wt. of total ash - Wt. of water insoluble ash% Water soluble ash value =

x 100 Wt. of crude drug taken

Page 56: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Determination of Sulphated ash value

• Silica crucible was heated to redness for 10 minute, allowed to

cool in a desiccator and weighed. The total ash obtained was taken

in the crucible and weighed accurately. It was ignited gently at

first, until the substance is thoroughly charred. the residue was

cooled, moistened with 1 ml of conc. Sulphuric acid, heated

gently until white fumes are no longer evolved and ignited at

450°C temperature until all black particles have disappeared.

Page 57: Class   adulteration & evaluation

The crucible was allowed to cool, a few drops of

conc. sulphuric acid was added and heated.

Ignited as before, allowed to cool and weighed.

The percentage of Sulphated ash was calculated.

Wt. of Sulphated ash% Sulphated ash value = x 100 Wt. of crude drug taken

Page 58: Class   adulteration & evaluation

DETERMINATION OF FOREIGN MATTER

• Weigh 100 –500 g of the drug sample to be

examined or the minimum quantity prescribed in the

monograph, and spread it out in a thin layer. The

foreign matter should be detected by inspection with

the unaided eye or by the use of a lens (6x). Separate

and weigh it and calculate the percentage present.

Page 59: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Chemical evaluation

• Most of drugs have definite chemical constituents to

which their biological or pharmacological activity is

attributed.

• Qualitative chemical test are used to identify certain drug

or to test their purity.

• The isolation, purification, identification of active

constituents is based on chemical methods of evaluation.

Page 60: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Some of these are useful in evaluation of

resins (acid value, sulphated ash),

balsams (acid value, saponification value and bester values),

volatile oils (acetyl and ester values) and

gums (methoxy determination and volatile acidity).

Preliminary phytochemical screening is a part of chemical evaluation.

These qualitative chemical tests are useful in identification of

chemical constituents and detection of adulteration.

Page 61: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Chemical evaluation scheme

Extraction of crude drug powder (successive solvent extraction)

Preliminary phytochemical screening

Chromatography & Spectroscopy

Page 62: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Step 1 – Preliminary phytochemical screening

Major phytochemicals• Alkaloids• Glycosides• Flavonoids• Steroids• Phenols• Tannins• Resins

• Amino acids• Carbohydrates• Gums• Volatile/essential oils• Fixed oils• Terpenoids• Saponins

Page 63: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Test for alkaloidsi) Mayer's test (Potassium Mercuric Iodide): The acid layer

with few drops of Mayer's reagent gives a creamy white precipitate.

ii) Wagner's Tests (Solution of Iodine in Potassium Iodide): The acid layer with few drops of Wagner's reagent gives reddish brown coloured precipitate.

iii) Hager's Test (Saturated solution of picric acid): The acid layer with Hager's reagent gives yellow precipitate.

iv) Dragendroff's test (Solution of Potassium Bismuth Iodide): Acid layer with few drops of Dragendroff's reagent gives reddish brown precipitate.

Page 64: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Tests for steroidsi) Salkowski Tests: Chloroform solution of the

extract when shaken with concentrated sulphuric acid and on standing yields red colour.

ii) Lieberman Burchard tests: Chloroform solution of the extract with few drops of acetic anhydride and one ml of concentrated sulphuric acid from the sides gives reddish ring at the junction of 2 layers.

Page 65: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Tests for Triterpenesi) Salkowski test: Chloroform solution of the

extract when shaken with concentrated sulphuric acid, lower layer turns to yellow on standing.

ii) Lieberman Burchard test: Chloroform solution of the extract with few drops of acetic acid and one ml concentrated sulphuric acid gives deep red at the junction of 2 layers.

Page 66: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Test of Tannins1. Goldbeater's skin test

Goldbeater's skin is a prototype of untanned fresh skin of an animal & is obtained as a membrane from the intestine of Ox. This membrane is treated with HCl; rinsed with distilled water and place in the tannin solution 5 min. Washed with distilled water and transferred into a solution of FeSO4. A brown or black colour on the skin denotes the presence of tannins.

Goldbeater's skin is a membrane prepared from the intestine of the ox and behaves similarly to an untanned hide.

Page 67: Class   adulteration & evaluation

2- Phenazone Test: To 5 ml of aqueous solution of tannin containing drug, add 0.5 g of sodium acid phosphate. Warm the solution, cool and filter. Add 2 % phenazone solution to the filtrate. All tannins are precipitated.

3- Gelatin Test: To a 1 % gelatin solution, add little 10 % sodium chloride. If a 1 % solution of tannin is added to the above gelatin solution, tannins cause precipitation of gelatin from solution.

Page 68: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Chemical Test for Volatile oil• Presence of volatile of oil can be detected by

following Test.1) Take thin section of the drug & add a drop of

tincture alkana. Red color is produced which indicates presence of volatile oil.

2) Take a thin Section of drug & add alcoholic soln of Sudan III – Red color, which indicate presence of volatile oil.

Page 69: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Test for Flavonoida) Alkaline reagent test: Extract was treated with 10

% NaOH solution; formation of intense yellow color indicates presence of Flavonoid.

b) Mg turning test: Extract were treated with Mg turning and add conc. HCl to this solution add 5ml of 95 % ethanol, formation of crimson red colour indicates Flavonoid.

c) Zinc test: 2 ml extract were treated with Zn dust and conc. HCl, development of red colour indicates presence of Flavonoid

Page 70: Class   adulteration & evaluation

d) Ferric chloride test: Alcoholic solution of the extracts mixed with few drops of neutral ferric chloride solution gives green colour.

Page 71: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• Test for Phenolic compounds • The extract (500 mg) was dissolved in 5 ml of

distilled water. To this, few drops of neutral 5% ferric chloride solution were added. A dark green color indicated the presence of phenolic compounds

Page 72: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• Test for gum and mucilage • About 10ml of the extract was slowly added to

25ml of absolute alcohol under constant stirring. Precipitation indicates the presence of gum and mucilage.

Page 73: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• Test for fixed oils and fats • A drop of concentrated extract was pressed in

between two filter papers and kept undisturbed. Oil stain on the paper indicates the presence of oils and fats

Page 74: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• Test for glycoside • Glycosides are compounds which upon

hydrolysis give rise to one or more sugars (glycones) and a compound which is not a sugar (aglycone or genuine).

• To the solution of the extract in glacial acetic acid, few drops of ferric chloride and concentrated sulphuric acid are added, and observed for a reddish brown coloration at the junction of two layers and the bluish green color in the upper layer.

Page 75: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• Test for amino acids a) Ninhydrin test To 1ml of sample, add 5drops of Ninhydrin

Reagent. Heated in a boiling water bath for 2 min. A purple color indicates the presence of amino acids.

b) Xanthoproteic test To 3ml of the sample, add 1ml of concentrated

nitric acid and heated for 3min. Then cooled and added 0.5 ml of NaOH. Reddish orange color indicates the presence of aromatic amino acids.

Page 76: Class   adulteration & evaluation

• Million’s test • To 1ml of sample, add 1ml of Million’s

reagent and heated for 3 minutes. Then 1% sodium nitrate is added. Red color formed indicates the presence of amino acids.

Page 77: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Tests for Saponinsi) Foam test: A small amount of extract is shaken with

little quantity of water. The foam produced persists for 10 min. It confirms the presence of saponins.

ii) Haemolysis test: To 2 ml normal saline in 2 test tubes, 2 ml distilled water is added to one and two ml of 1 % extract to the other five drops of blood is added to each test tube and gently mixed with the content. Haemolysis observed under the microscope in the tube containing the extracts indicates the presence of saponin.

Page 78: Class   adulteration & evaluation

Tests for Carbohydrates• MOLISCH TEST • Take 2 ml of carbohydrate solution in a clean and dry

test tube. Add 2 drops of ethanolic Alpha Naphthol (Molisch reagent) and mix. Incline the test tube and add carefully 2 ml of concentrated sulphuric acid along the side of the test tube so as to form 2 layers.

• An appearance of reddish violet or purple colored ring at the junction of two liquids is observed in a positive Molisch test.