bright spots study for english language...
TRANSCRIPT
© E3 Alliance, 2013
BRIGHT SPOTS STUDY FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Food For Thought Presentation 4/30/13
© E3 Alliance, 2013
E3 Alliance uses objective data and focused community collaboration to align our education systems so all students succeed and lead Central
Texas to economic prosperity
Mission
E3 Alliance is a Catalyst For Educational Change in Central Texas
E3 serves as the Central Texas regional P-16 Council
© E3 Alliance, 2013
WHAT WE ARE UNDERTAKING: Massive systemic change with no
structural authority to make it happen!
Collective Impact!
When non-profits, business, government and the public are brought together around a common agenda to focus on a specific social problem.
© E3 Alliance, 2013
• Improved Student
Outcomes
• Economic Prosperity
E3 Alliance Model for Change
Using Information to Change Practice
Building Community Will for Change
Regional Strategic Plan
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Elementary
Grades Pre-K &
Kindergarten
Early
Childhood
Middle
Grades
High School
Grades
Higher
Education Career & Life
Goal One: All children enter Kindergarten
school ready
Goal Two: Eliminate achievement gaps while
improving overall student
performance
Goal Three: All students graduate college &
career ready & prepared for a
lifetime of learning
Goal Four: As a community, Central Texas prepares children to succeed
Central Texas’ strategic plan to build the strongest educational pipeline in the country
E3 Alliance Cradle-to-Career Continuum
Ready, Set, K!
Campaign for Grade Level Reading
Kids Vision for Life
RAISEup
Texas STEM Pipeline Austin College Access Network
Increased Attendance | ELL Collaborative | Teacher Effectiveness | Council on Educator
Preparation
© E3 Alliance, 2013
• Improved Student
Outcomes
• Economic Prosperity
E3 Alliance Model for Change
Bridging disconnects; Overcoming barriers;
Aligning resources and practices
Changed Practices
Common Agenda
Systems Change
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Systemic Alignment Using Action Research
Common Agenda
Changed Practices
Systems Change
• Share measures • Cultivate resources
through collaboration • Identify innovation &
promise • Align practices
INFORMED DECISIONS
SHARED COMMITMENT
• Institutional commitment
• Build policy support for proven strategies
• Scale Successes
DATA INSIGHTS
• Research issue • Recruit stakeholders • Convene community • Build community will • Set targets
• Evaluate progress • Renew Commitment
© E3 Alliance, 2013
English Language Learners (ELL)
• ELLs are students who have not yet passed an English proficiency test
• 838,494 ELL students are in Texas public schools (2011-12)
– One out of Six students are ELLs
– Texas has more ELLs than 28 states have students!
• Over 120 languages are spoken in Texas schools
Source: TEA English Language Learners Portal, 2012
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Central Texas ELL Collaborative
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Why did we do the Bright Spots Study?
1. ELL students are the fastest growing population in Central Texas
2. ELLs are challenging population to serve
3. Practices are inconsistent
4. The best practices identified in this study can be implemented for systemic change
5. The challenges can be addressed to strengthen instruction for ELLs
10
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Morning Agenda
1. Presentation of the Bright Spots Study
2. Principal Panel Discussion
3. Open Floor Discussion
11
© E3 Alliance, 2013
BRIGHT SPOTS STUDY FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
12
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Framework for Thinking About the Findings
1. Opportunities for professional development
2. Strategic investment of limited resources
3. Principal leadership development
4. Hiring practices
5. Integration of Bilingual Department with C & I
6. Building capacity for serving ELLs
13
© E3 Alliance, 2013
RESEARCH DESIGN Bright Spots Study for English Language Learners
14
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Bright Spots Study
Purpose:
– Identification of intentional, systemic, and replicable practices at high performing schools at both the campus and district level that led to growth in academic achievement for ELLs
Study Focus:
– Elementary schools
– Mathematics
15
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Bright Spots Study
Where do students show growth?
– Student Growth Percentile (SGP) identified campuses eliminating achievement gaps for ELLs:
– High growth in achievement for ELLs on state assessments; with
– Normal/high growth in achievement for non-ELLs
– In grades 4 & 5
Tiered-qualitative evaluation used
200 district employees participated in the Study.
16
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Central Texas ELL Collaborative
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Bright Spots Study
Participating schools and their principals: 1. Tanji Towels - Pioneer Crossing Elementary (MISD)
2. Barry Miller - Parmer Lane Elementary (PISD)
3. Tere Ralston - Spring Hill Elementary (PISD)
4. Francisca Maldanado - Smith Elementary (DVISD)
5. Tonya King - Pillow Elementary (AISD)
6. Sherri Mull - Wooldridge Elementary (AISD)
7. Blaine Helwig - Graham Elementary (AISD)
8. Azucena Garcia - Sanchez Elementary (AISD)
© E3 Alliance, 2013
PROMISING PRACTICES Bright Spots Study for English Language Learners
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Principal Instructional Leadership
Principals drive achievement in mathematics
– Math content expert and/or hired instructional specialists
– Developed support structures to develop content expertise among teachers
– Class schedule devotes substantial time to math
Bright Spot principals have a deep commitment to students’ success/neighborhood
– Buy-in from faculty, students & families
– Most principals have served their school for over a decade
20
© E3 Alliance, 2013
School Culture
Use of positive behavior supports (PBS) – Focus on respectful dialog
– Early warning system
Idea of inclusion & “you belong”
Setting the tone for increasing parent engagement – Work to improve communications with non-English speaking
families
– Welcoming environment; friendly Spanish-speaking office staff
– Cultural diversity celebrated
– Broadening opportunities for parents to seek out information
High expectations for academic achievement
– Hiring dedicated faculty
21
© E3 Alliance, 2013
One-Third of Bright Spot Teachers Had 13 or More Years of Teaching Experience
22
13%
20% 20%
11%
5%
32%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
1-2 Years 3-5 Years 5-7 Years 8-10 Years 11-12 Years 13 or MoreYears
Num
ber
of Teachers
Years of Teaching Experience
Bright Spot Teachers' Total Years of Teaching Experience
© E3 Alliance, 2013
One-Third of Bright Spot Teachers Entered Through Alternative Certification
Bachelor Level Educator Program;
56%
Master's Educator Program;
8%
Alternative Certification;
35%
Emergency Certification;
1%
“What method of study did you pursue to receive your teaching credential?”
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Investment in Administrative Personnel
It’s All About the Human Capital
– Title 1 funds are used efficiently to get “the most bang for your buck.”
• Instructional specialist
• Parent support specialist
• Discipline specialist
• Testing coordinator
• Assistant principal
– Title 3 funds used to improve the transition of immigrant/refugee children
• Newcomer teacher 24
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Purposeful and Rigorous Curriculum
Departmentalization
– Creates content experts
– Minimizes stress of preparing students for up to 3 STAAR tests
– Standardizes curriculum across bilingual and non-bilingual program
25
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Purposeful and Rigorous Curriculum
Professional learning communities (PLCs)
– Tie curriculum to Texas Essential Knowledge & Skills (TEKS)
– Ensure horizontal and vertical curriculum alignment
– Develop campus-wide instructional strategies
– Develop practices to support continuous improvement of teacher effectiveness
– Focus on increasing student engagement
26
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Teacher Effectiveness in Mathematics
Development of foundational math concepts and skills
– Alignment of activities to build connections
Instructional strategies promote English acquisition:
– Scaffolding of math curriculum for literacy
– Emphasis on literacy and oral fluency in mathematics
Emphasis on word problems: – Consistency in problem-solving
– Modeling of mathematical thought processes 27
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Investment in Teacher Effectiveness
Teachers praised investment in professional development. They want PD:
– Topic/content based and grade-level based
– Available in the summer and online
– Training for dual language implemented year prior to roll-up
Campus-wide expectation: ALL teachers hold ESL certification or bilingual certification
– Provides instructional strategies for all teachers for all students.
28
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Teachers at Bright Spot Schools are Highly Qualified to Serve ELLs
Teachers Without ELL
Certifications; 17%
Teachers With ELL
Certifications; 83%
83% of Bright Spot Teachers Hold ESL &/or Bilingual Certifications
29
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Model of Campus-Wide Instructional Template
30
Ultimate Driver
• Principal Instructional Leadership
Supporting Structures
• Teacher Effectiveness
• School Culture
• Investment in Administrative Personnel & Staff
• Departmentali-zation of Content in Upper Grades
• Class Schedules that Make More Time for Math
• PLCs
• Focused PD
• Literacy Focus in Mathematics
What You See In Classroom
• Aligned Curriculum
• Purposeful & Effective Instructional Practices Across Grades
• Respectful Dialog
• High Levels of Student Engagement
• Urgency in Instruction; 2-3 Periods of Learning in 1 Period
• Emphasis on Academic mathematics vocabulary
• Staff Longevity
Student Outcomes
• Growth in Achievement in Content Area
• Reduction/ Elimination of ELL Achievement Gap
© E3 Alliance, 2013
CHALLENGES & IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE
Bright Spots Study for English Language Learners
31
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Lack of Collaboration and Alignment with Feeder Schools
Promising Practices focus on collaboration and vertical alignment of math curriculum across grade levels at elementary schools.
However, collaboration with feeder middle school(s) is minimal.
– Principals have monthly meetings with middle and high school principals of their assigned vertical team
– Two of eight principals interviewed mentioned their feeder MS was not included in their HS’s vertical teams
– No teacher-to-teacher collaborations exist to share best practices for supporting ELL students or for improving mathematics instruction
32
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Building Capacity: In the Secondary Years
Middle school years are the focus of districts for improving existing ELL programs.
– MISD & DVISD are using newcomer program approach
– PISD and AISD have plans to roll-up dual language into 6th - 8th in upcoming years.
33
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Building Capacity: Curriculum Integration
Bilingual Department = compliance
Growing need to integrate Bilingual Department with Curriculum & Instruction
What’s to be gained?
– Reduce existing inefficiencies occurring at classroom level
– Improve collaboration between elementary and middle schools
– Impact long-term student outcomes of ELLs
34
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Building Capacity: Developing a Pool of High Quality Bilingual Teachers
All four directors strongly identified dual language (DL) to be the model of choice.
– Choice between high-quality one-way DL & low-quality two-way DL
The key to expanding existing dual language programs into middle school or early exit programs into late exit or DL is creating a larger pool of highly-qualified bilingual teachers.
What is the right target for a community-wide effort to develop a larger pool of bilingual teachers?
35
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Promising Practices Identified at Bright Spots Schools
36
District-Level
Campus-Level
Teacher-
Level
© E3 Alliance, 2013
PRINCIPAL PANEL Bright Spots Study for English Language Learners
37
© E3 Alliance, 2013
OPEN DISCUSSION Bright Spots Study for English Language Learners
38
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Collective Impact
1. How do we begin to implement what we have learned from these schools and 4 districts to enhance learning of ELLs in schools throughout our region?
2. How do we work together to overcome shared challenges across the region?
39
© E3 Alliance, 2013
SAVE THE DATE! Upcoming Public Summit
Absence Reasons Study: Why Students are Absent in Central Texas
Tuesday June 11th
2:00-4:30 PM Location TBA
www.e3alliance.org
© E3 Alliance, 2013
www.e3alliance.org
The conclusions of this research do not necessarily reflect the opinions or official position of the Texas Education Agency,
the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, or the State of Texas.
© E3 Alliance, 2013
On-Going Challenge: Student Mobility
• Principal perception of dramatically increased mobility in past few years – Immigrant students increasingly arrive from South and Central America
and less from Mexico “have multiple variations of the Spanish language.”
– Growing refugee populations
– Impact of economic recession with families searching for employment and low-cost housing
• Three identified regions of high mobility – Between Austin ISD, Manor ISD, and Pflugerville ISD (north Austin
Braker/Parmer & I-35)
– Between Austin ISD and Del Valle ISD (south Austin)
– Between Bastrop ISD and Del Valle ISD (east of Austin)
42
© E3 Alliance, 2013
43
© E3 Alliance, 2013
On-Going Challenge: Student Mobility
44
18%
23%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Perc
enta
ge o
f S
tudents
Who A
ttended
a D
iffe
rent S
chool in
the P
revio
us Y
ear
Student Mobility, 2010-11
Texas
15 CandidateBright SpotSchools
© E3 Alliance, 2013
On-Going Challenge: Student Mobility
45
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Perc
enta
ge o
f S
tudents
Who A
ttended a
D
iffe
rent S
chool in
the P
revio
us Y
ear
Student Mobility Rates, 2000 Through 2012
Texas
CentralTexas
4 CaseStudyBright SpotSchools
© E3 Alliance, 2013
On-Going Challenge: Student Mobility
46
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Perc
enta
ge o
f S
tudents
Who A
ttended a
D
iffe
rent S
chool in
the P
revio
us Y
ear
Student Mobility Rates, 2000 Through 2012
Texas
CentralTexas
4 CaseStudyBright SpotSchools
© E3 Alliance, 2013
On-Going Challenge: Student Mobility
• Causes students to face significant instructional challenges – Student attend 8-9 different schools by 3rd grade
– Changes in instructional strategies, pace, language in which content is learned, instructional supports, curricula materials
– Students switch between languages for both ELA and Science
– Students miss science unit; or repeat science unit
• How are districts attempting to meet this challenge? – Strong scope and sequence
– Subject-specific benchmark tests with meaningful data that follows student
– The Texas Student Data System (TSDS) being piloted in seven Texas districts, including Hays and Taylor in Central Texas, is intended to provide this sort of “student data backpack” for rapid transfer of mobile student data.
47
© E3 Alliance, 2013
The ELL Collaborative
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Robust Professional Learning Communities
PLC Practice
Percentage of Bright Spot
Teachers Conducting Activity
on At Least Weekly Basis
Share proposed classroom hands-on activities 87%
Co-produce lesson plans for team use in the
coming week(s)
84%
Discuss interventions for struggling students 80%
Align upcoming grade-level content to TEKS 79%
Identify struggling students 72%
Co-produce quizzes, tests, or unit assessments for
team members to use in the coming week(s)
70%
Discuss instructional strategies aimed at English
language learners
62%
Discuss classroom management strategies 62%
Collaborate with instructional specialists 61%
Share finished student products as exemplars 59%
Discuss student-level data from tests or
assessments
55%
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Principal, Early Years, Celebrating Diversity & Rigor are Critical Components for ELL Success
24%
27%
29%
32%
32%
39%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Campus-based communication is given in multiple languages.
Our campus has strong collaboration that improves teaching effectiveness for ELLs.
The math curriculum is academically rigorous for ALL students.
Our campus makes a point to celebrate cultural diversity.
A robust early childhood program serves ELLs.
Our principal is a strong leader.
"Select from the following the THREE top assets that exist at your campus that you feel have driven student success."
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Impact of State Assessment Math is emphasized in grades 3-5 when accountability comes into play
Principals support role of Texas assessment system
Impact of STAAR’s Increased Rigor:
– 4 hour time limit is a huge issue - fluency is critical now.
– Reading aspect of math has increased dramatically.
– Math problems now 3-step problems
5th Grade TAKS Item
Admission to a basketball tournament
is $7 per person. If 179 people pay to
attend the tournament, how much
money will be collected for admission?
A $956
B $1,193
C $1,253
D $793
51
5th Grade STAAR Released Item
Mr. Cantú will put 1 flag on each table in the cafeteria for a school event. The cafeteria has 15 rows with 5 tables in each row and 12 rows with 4 tables in each row. Mr. Cantú already has 94 flags. How many more flags does he need to buy?
A 48
B 19
C 27
D 29
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Impact of State Assessment
Instructional practices supporting student success on Math STAAR:
– Word problems, word problems, and more word problems
– Academic vocabulary
– Reading out loud
– Word walls (word, definition, illustration)
Assessment accommodations: – Students entering DL in 4th grade are 2 years behind academically; a linguistically
accommodated version of math test is available in Spanish version for those behind by one year, but this does not suffice for students two years behind
– There is no Spanish version for ELLs who are also identified as needing special education services.
– Practices of the LPAC are critical for ensuring ELLs take the right test for them. Bright Spot teachers felt they had strong practices for ensuring ELLs don’t get misdiagnosed as needing special education services, and for taking the appropriate version of the state assessment.
52
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Non-Negotiables for Dual Language Programs
1. Collaborative grouping in the classroom
2. Hands-on activities
3. Literacy
4. Vocabulary development
5. Separation of language
53
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Competing Priorities
Principals Focused on the “Here and Now”
– Decisions for immediate academic success
– importance of English to a non-English family’s daily living in America; Principals note English is critical for those moving back to Mexico for economic success
– General belief that early transition of math curriculum into English improves student success
– Departmentalization as a response to the need to build content expertise for success on assessments.
Districts focus on long-term success of ELLs
– Leaders make decisions in line with research-driven practices for L-T success.
– literacy and fluency in student’s native language improve L-T outcomes
– Instruction in Spanish language with the goal of biliterate, bicultural students
– Cross-disciplinary instruction that aligns with preparation for careers in the 21st Century
54
© E3 Alliance, 2013
On-Going Challenge: Achievement in Science
• No clear consensus among Bright Spot campuses for what drives science achievement for ELLs – “Easier in L1 because of reading component” versus “better to do in
English because of vocabulary component”
– Some say Science is easier in English because hands on; teaching with ESL component
• State assessment system does not focus on science nor provide data that allows analysis for what drives improvement
• Science units are often shared throughout a district – Highly mobile students may miss a science unit; or do same unit twice
• Students switch back and forth between learning science in English and Spanish as they move between districts.
55
© E3 Alliance, 2013
On-Going Challenge: Lack of Creativity and Technology Skills
• Campus-wide instructional template leaves little room for creativity, sustained student cross-curriculum collaborations & development of 21st Century skills
• Technology – Computers devoted to supporting literacy -> primary use is reading assessment
• Wooldridge Elem was the only case study campus with computers in every classroom; Bilingual classrooms at Parmer Lane Elem have 2 computers
• Single computer lab was used by all classes for reading assessment in 20-minute blocks
• Technology did not appear adaptable for research and creative organization of learning
– 6 Technology Applications strands cover K-2nd & 3-5th
(1) Creativity and innovation, and
(2) Communication and collaboration,
(3) Research and information fluency,
(4) Critical thinking,
(5) Digital Citizenship, problem solving, and decision making, and
(6) Technology operations and concepts
56
© E3 Alliance, 2013
On-Going Challenge: Lack of Creativity and Technology Skills
• Lack of district-level devotion to meeting the needs of G/T – 1 teacher serving all grades with 20-minute pullout
– No G/T teacher; Classroom teacher is expected to personalize instruction
• Stratigically crafted afterschool and summer activities could promote both – One candidate school held after school robotics course led and funded by
community volunteers when their vertical team’s priority was STEM; 4th grader ELLs participated in STEM summer school program
– Cross-curriculum collaboration could be emphasized
57
© E3 Alliance, 2013
ON-GOING CHALLENGES CONNECTED TO DISTRICT-LEVEL SYSTEMS
Bright Spots Study for English Language Learners
58
© E3 Alliance, 2013
On-Going Challenge: Complexity of Bilingual Education Programs
• Several key factors impact the choice of bilingual program implemented by a district – Level of federal and state funding received
– Diversity of student population determines campus-based programs and personnel allocation at an individual school
– Access to qualified personnel to staff a bilingual program (bilingual certification & content expertise)
• Scaling successful programs requires: – Faculty buy-in for program implementation fidelity – particularly DL
– The will and investment of resources that are ultimately driven by district leadership (including school boards) and articulated in L-T strategic documents
59
© E3 Alliance, 2013
On-Going Challenge: Complexity of Bilingual Education Programs
Bilingual programs, even those with the same name, look very different across districts.
60
Example of Two Dual Language Programs in AISD & PISD
Parmer Lane Elementary, PISD Wooldridge, AISD
All subject areas taught in Spanish in primary
years.
The language of instruction for each subject
holds across all grades (PK-5th grade).
Math and Science are loosely tied together
and gradually transition into English together
in 1st with instruction completely in English in
2nd grade.
Math is taught in English. Science is taught in
Spanish.
Math teacher responsible for science Reading teacher responsible for science.
Instructional strategies utilized appear more
similar to those used at Smith Elementary in
Del Valle ISD (Transitional Early Exit)
Instructional strategies utilized appear more
similar to those used at Pioneer Crossing
Elementary in Manor ISD (Transitional Early
Exit)
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Implications for Practice: Securing Basic Nutritional and Social Needs
• 14 of 15 Candidate Bright Spot Schools received Title 1 funding
• 11 out of the 15 candidate schools had 85% or more of their students identified as economically disadvantaged.
• 2 of 8 schools participating in BSS had robust business connections to meet academic and social needs of students
• Bright Spot Schools Responded Creatively to Nutritional Needs
– 2 Schools collaborate with UT to provide fresh foods
– One case study school rations breakfast in order to provide mid-morning snack to students; teachers provide afternoon snack through own funds
– One school has mom and 2 siblings eat from tray of older elementary students; mom and siblings “hang out” from 10:30-1pm to eat.
– Academic growth of a candidate schools appeared to be as much from providing for basic needs as from teacher effectiveness through highly experienced teachers; not systemic practices
61
© E3 Alliance, 2013
ON-GOING CHALLENGES RELATED TO STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS & ACHIEVEMENT
Bright Spots Study for English Language Learners
62
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Parents’ Lack of Literacy, Mobility and Lack of Time are On-Going Challenges
16%
18%
25%
34%
57%
59%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60%
There is a lack of diversity in learning resources availablefor English language learners.
There is too much focus on standardized tests by campusadministration.
There is a lack of time to implement instructionalpractices that would support English language learners.
There is a lack of time to implement professionaldevelopment.
Our students have high rates of mobility.
Parents of English language learners are unlikely tospeak or understand English.
“Identify the top THREE on-going challenges that exist
at your campus that hinder student success.”
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Possible Next Steps
• Where is the “low-hanging fruit” in meeting some of these challenges?
• In what ways can we collaborate regionally to improve student success?
• Topics for further research:
– Science achievement
– Promising practices of middle schools/L-T ELL success
64
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Possible Next Steps and Opportunities
• District-Specific Insights with Bilingual Director/ Leadership
• Symposium for Principals on Promising Practices
• Symposium for Teachers on Specific Instructional Strategies
• Regional Initiative
• Collateral of Promising Practices
• Use of Case Studies
65
© E3 Alliance, 2013
On-Going Challenge: Sharing Best Practices
• How Can We Share District-Level Best Practices? – Promising LPAC policies
– Reducing special education identification of ELLs
– Funding Strategies
– Curriculum alignment
– Standardizing curriculum across regular, ELS and bilingual classes
– New teacher induction
– Professional Development that helps ELLs
– Practices that promote long-term success of ELLs
– Reducing the effects of mobility
– sharing student data records across districts
66
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Across Texas, More Schools are Identified as Bright Spots in Math than in Reading
557
208
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Mathematics ReadingEle
me
nta
ry S
ch
oo
ls in
Te
xa
s w
ith
H
igh
Gro
wth
, b
y S
tud
en
t G
rou
p
AllStudents
Column1
High Growth Elementary Schools, by Student Population,
Identified as having a Student Growth Percentile Score of 60 or Higher
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Across Texas, More Schools are Identified as Bright Spots in Math than in Reading
557
208
620
377
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Mathematics ReadingEle
me
nta
ry S
ch
oo
ls in
Te
xa
s w
ith
H
igh
Gro
wth
, b
y S
tud
en
t G
rou
p
AllStudents
EnglishLanguageLearners
High Growth Elementary Schools, by Student Population,
Identified as having a Student Growth Percentile Score of 60 or Higher
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Distribution of ELL Bright Spots
• English Language Learners – Based on the number of Bright Spot elementary schools in
math, Texas has 60% of the expected Bright Spots in Reading • Math: 620 Bright Spots across Texas
• Reading: 377 Bright Spots across Texas
– Central Texas has 20% of the expected Bright Spots in Reading • Math: 15 Bright Spots
• Reading: Bright Spots
• All Students – There are fewer Bright Spots in both content areas
– The gap in Bright Spots is wider for All Students • Math: 557 Bright Spots across Texas
• Reading: 208 Bright Spots across Texas
© E3 Alliance, 2013
SGP Distribution Across Texas
• Half of Texas elementary schools’ reading SGP are between 43.5 & 52.
• Half of Texas elementary schools’ math SGP are between 41 and 56.
• E3 used a score of 60 as the cut-off for bright spot selection; this accounts for the fewer number of schools that are bright spots in reading.
• The distributions are very different between math and reading. Why? Test construction?
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Conclusions From SGP Data
• Texas – The variance in academic growth between math and
reading is less for ELLs; ELLs are doing much better in reading across Texas than the general population
– Hypothesis: Title 1 funding supports English language learners and its use in hiring instructional coaches leads to growth in both math and reading
• Central Texas – Regional emphasis in STEM may have lead to many
more Bright Spots schools for English language learners in mathematics than would be expected.
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Receipt of Special Education Services is Lowest for ELLs in the Bilingual Program
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Pre-K K 1 2 3 4 5
Perc
enta
ge o
f
Engl
ish
Lan
guag
e Le
arn
ers
Grade Level
Special Education Participation by ELL Program, 2010-11
ESL
Bilingual
Neither
Non-ELL
Source: E3 Alliance analysis of 2010-11 PEIMS data from UT Educational Resource Center © E3
Alliance, 2012
Note: Neither represents students whose parents have waived ELL services.
© E3 Alliance, 2013
6th Grade Matters for Student Growth
49 50 54
46
74
45 50
44
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
Ave
rage
SG
P S
core
by
Gra
de
Leve
l
Grades 4th through 8th
ElementarySchools WithoutGrade 6
ElementarySchools WhichInclude Grade 6
Middle Schools
Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Scores by Grade Level, Austin ISD Elementary and Middle Schools, 2011 Math TAKS
Notes: Elementary schools without grade 6: N = 27; 44.8% of students were ELLs Elementary schools which include grade 6: N = 9; 44.5% of students were ELLs Middle schools which include grades 6 through 8: N = 12; 15.2 % of students were ELLs
© E3 Alliance, 2013
6th Grade Matters for Student Growth
49 50 54
46
74
45 50
44
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
Ave
rage
SG
P S
core
by
Gra
de
Leve
l
Grades 4th through 8th
ElementarySchools WithoutGrade 6
ElementarySchools WhichInclude Grade 6
Middle Schools
Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Scores by Grade Level, Austin ISD Elementary and Middle Schools, 2011 Math TAKS
Notes: Elementary schools without grade 6: N = 27; 44.8% of students were ELLs Elementary schools which include grade 6: N = 9; 44.5% of students were ELLs Middle schools which include grades 6 through 8: N = 12; 15.2 % of students were ELLs
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Schools with Greater ELL participation in Special Education Do Better on TAKS
R² = 0.3714
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0%Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
EL
Ls A
tta
inin
g
Com
me
nd
ed
Pe
rfo
rma
nce
in M
ath
Percentage of ELL students taking Modified Version of the Math TAKS Test
Comparison of the Participate rate of ELLs in Special Education,
by ELL Commended Performance, 2011 Math TAKS
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Dramatic Changes in ELL Growth Rate
from 2001 to 2012
© E3
Alliance,
2013 Source: E3 Alliance analysis of district-level AEIS data from the
Texas Education Agency.
2.7%
5.3%
4.9% 4.8%
3.6% 4.0%
2.8%
5.9%
3.2%
2.0% 1.8% 0.8%
9.6%
11.4%
7.4%
9.0%
10.3%
9.5% 9.8%
12.8%
6.4%
5.1%
3.4%
1.4%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
An
nu
al
Gro
wth
Rate
Texas
CTX
© E3 Alliance, 2013
Dramatic Changes in ELL Growth Rate
from 2001 to 2012
Source: E3 Alliance analysis of district-level
AEIS data from the Texas Education Agency.
3.8%
2.1%
3.5% 2.6%
3.8% 4.2%
3.9%
3.9%
3.0% 3.4% 3.0%
2.1%
7.1%
5.1%
7.6%
5.5%
7.1%
6.3% 6.6%
5.8%
5.0%
4.9%
8.8%
2.9%
9.6%
11.4%
7.4%
9.0%
10.3%
9.5%
9.8%
12.8%
6.4%
5.1%
3.4%
1.4%
2.7%
5.3%
4.9% 4.8%
3.6% 4.0%
2.8%
5.9%
3.2%
2.0% 1.8% 0.8%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
An
nu
al G
row
th R
ate
CTX: All Students
CTX: Hispanic
CTX: ELLs
Texas: ELLs
© E3 Alliance, 2013
On-Going Challenge: State Assessment 5th Grade TAKS Item
Admission to a basketball tournament is $7 per person. If 179 people pay to attend the tournament, how much money will be collected for admission?
A $956
B $1,193
C $1,253
D $793
5th Grade STAAR Released Item
Mr. Cantú will put 1 flag on each table in the cafeteria for a school event. The cafeteria has 15 rows with 5 tables in each row and 12 rows with 4 tables in each row. Mr. Cantú already has 94 flags. How many more flags does he need to buy?
A 48
B 19
C 27
D 29
78