breaking up. breaking up. how specific characteristics of the divorce process interact with the...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
218 views
TRANSCRIPT
Breaking up. Breaking up. How specific characteristics of the divorce process interact
with the wellbeing of ex-partners after divorce.
8th meeting of the European Network for the Sociological and Demographic Studies of Divorce – oct.2010
Sara Symoens & Piet Bracke Ghent University
Introduction
• total divorce ratio for Belgium +-50%• research on divorce and wellbeing:
depression, anxiety, stress, life-satisfaction,…social-relational and socio-economic factors (stress- and coping th.)– for differences between the married and divorced– but how to explain remaining differences in
adaptation within the group of the divorcees?• impact of the divorce trajectory itself?
Impact of the divorce process
• Extending stress and coping theories with characteristics of the divorce process– indicators of time and duration
• Time since the divorce (chronic strain or stress?)• Duration of the divorce process (-)
– process-related indicators• Initiation (+)• Perception of fairness (division of goods) (+)• Conflict (relief or strain?)
– process related post–divorce indicators• quality of the relationship with the ex-spouse (+)
Gender, divorce and mental health• Women consistently report higher levels of
distress, and lower levels of wellbeing• Gender differential effects of characteristics of
the divorce process?– Gender-role theories: id. of women << social
relationships and how well they are able to form and maintain theseid. of men << individualisation and personal achievement
=> gender differences for conflict, relationship-quality and initiation?
Research questions
• “What is the impact of the divorce process? Are quick divorces better? Does time heal? And what is the impact of initiation, conflict, or the (un)fairness of the division of goods? Can we detect ‘model’ trajectories? Or gender-differential effects?”
• In social research: one indicator, or ad-hoc• Important for policy-makers!
• Data – the ‘Divorce in Flanders’-project, 2009-10
www.divorceinflanders.be– Multi-actor & divorce specific (preliminary) data– 1624 men & 1946 women, aged 25-60
Data, methods & variables
•Methods– Linear regression models, women and men
separately– 2 analyses: (1) mental health differences married
versus divorced, (2) mental health differences between divorcees
– PASW 18.0.
• Variables– Y= depression (CES-D8) & life-satisfaction (0-10)– X= time since divorce; duration of the legal
procedure; initiation (yes-no); level of conflict during divorce (3 catn); perception of fairness (3 catn) & current relationship quality (3catn + no contact)
– C = age; new partner; kids & education
MEN (25-60) WOMEN (25-60)
depression (0-10) lifesatisfaction (0-10) depression (0-10) lifesatisfaction (0-10)
Parameter p.e. sig. p.e. sig. p.e. sig. p.e. sig.
Intercept 1,322 *** 8,079 *** 1,662 *** 8,082 ***
Divorced (married=ref.cat.) 0,379 *** -0,234 ** 0,53 *** -0,292 ***
Results 1. Differences in mental health by marital state
MEN (25-60) WOMEN (25-60)
depression (0-10) lifesatisfaction (0-10) depression (0-10) lifesatisfaction (0-10)
Parameter p.e. sig. p.e. sig. p.e. sig. p.e. sig.
Intercept 1,322 *** 8,079 *** 1,662 *** 8,082 ***
Divorced (married=ref.cat.) 0,379 *** -0,234 ** 0,53 *** -0,292 ***
Intercept 2,064 *** 6,823 *** 2,439 *** 6,96 ***
Divorced (married=ref.cat.) 0,087 0,261 ** 0,177 * 0,217 **
Partner (yes) -0,751 *** 1,271 *** -0,792 *** 1,143 ***
Results 1. Differences in mental health by marital state
• Divorced men and women: worse mental health scores than the married on both depression and life-satisfaction.
• However, it is the absence of a partner, rather than the experience of the divorce.
2. Impact of the divorce process
Conclusion 1
DIVORCED MEN (N=1139) DIVORCED WOMEN (N=1348)depression (0-10) lifesatisfaction (0-10) depression (0-10) lifesatisfaction (0-10)
p.e. sig. p.e. sig. p.e. sig. p.e. sig.(Constant) 1,741 *** 7,162 *** 2,293 *** 7,669 ***
Time since D < 3yrs ,465 * -,646 *** -,178 ,036
Duration of process ,008 ** -,004 ,002 ,003
Initative (yes) -,053 ,225 * -,032 ,254 **
Goods fair divided
Goods anti me ,197 * -,143 ,387 **** -,386 ***
Goods pro me ,260 ,119 ,180 ,049
Low divorce conflict
High divorce conflict -,033 -,054 ,262 (*) -,235
Med divorce conflict ,042 ,090 ,123 ,102
Good quality relation ex
no contact with ex -,046 ,129 -,083 ,245 **
Bad quality relation ex ,102 ,028 ,321 (*) -,151
OK quality relation ex ,148 -,213 ,052 -,025
age ,001 -,002 ,000 -,014 (*)
Partner in hh -,723 *** 1,242 *** -,812 *** 1,083 ***
Kids in hh -,001 ,108 -,189 ,027
Education high
Education low ,129 ,072 ,401 ** -,123
Education medium ,019 -,037 ,173 -,114
DIVORCED MEN (N=1139) DIVORCED WOMEN (N=1348)depression (0-10) lifesatisfaction (0-10) depression (0-10) lifesatisfaction (0-10)
p.e. sig. p.e. sig. p.e. sig. p.e. sig.(Constant) 1,741 *** 7,162 *** 2,293 *** 7,669 ***
Time since D < 3yrs ,465 * -,646 *** -,178 ,036
Duration of process ,008 ** -,004 ,002 ,003
Initative (yes) -,053 ,225 * -,032 ,254 **
Goods fair divided
Goods anti me ,197 * -,143 ,387 **** -,386 ***
Goods pro me ,260 ,119 ,180 ,049
Low divorce conflict
High divorce conflict -,033 -,054 ,262 (*) -,235
Med divorce conflict ,042 ,090 ,123 ,102
Good quality relation ex
no contact with ex -,046 ,129 -,083 ,245 **
Bad quality relation ex ,102 ,028 ,321 (*) -,151
OK quality relation ex ,148 -,213 ,052 -,025
age ,001 -,002 ,000 -,014 (*)
Partner in hh -,723 *** 1,242 *** -,812 *** 1,083 ***
Kids in hh -,001 ,108 -,189 ,027
Education high
Education low ,129 ,072 ,401 ** -,123
Education medium ,019 -,037 ,173 -,114
DIVORCED MEN (N=1139) DIVORCED WOMEN (N=1348)depression (0-10) lifesatisfaction (0-10) depression (0-10) lifesatisfaction (0-10)
p.e. sig. p.e. sig. p.e. sig. p.e. sig.(Constant) 1,741 *** 7,162 *** 2,293 *** 7,669 ***
Time since D < 3yrs ,465 * -,646 *** -,178 ,036
Duration of process ,008 ** -,004 ,002 ,003
Initative (yes) -,053 ,225 * -,032 ,254 **
Goods fair divided
Goods anti me ,197 * -,143 ,387 **** -,386 ***
Goods pro me ,260 ,119 ,180 ,049
Low divorce conflict
High divorce conflict -,033 -,054 ,262 (*) -,235
Med divorce conflict ,042 ,090 ,123 ,102
Good quality relation ex
no contact with ex -,046 ,129 -,083 ,245 **
Bad quality relation ex ,102 ,028 ,321 (*) -,151
OK quality relation ex ,148 -,213 ,052 -,025
age ,001 -,002 ,000 -,014 (*)
Partner in hh -,723 *** 1,242 *** -,812 *** 1,083 ***
Kids in hh -,001 ,108 -,189 ,027
Education high
Education low ,129 ,072 ,401 ** -,123
Education medium ,019 -,037 ,173 -,114
DIVORCED MEN (N=1139) DIVORCED WOMEN (N=1348)depression (0-10) lifesatisfaction (0-10) depression (0-10) lifesatisfaction (0-10)
p.e. sig. p.e. sig. p.e. sig. p.e. sig.(Constant) 1,741 *** 7,162 *** 2,293 *** 7,669 ***
Time since D < 3yrs ,465 * -,646 *** -,178 ,036
Duration of process ,008 ** -,004 ,002 ,003
Initative (yes) -,053 ,225 * -,032 ,254 **
Goods fair divided
Goods anti me ,197 * -,143 ,387 **** -,386 ***
Goods pro me ,260 ,119 ,180 ,049
Low divorce conflict
High divorce conflict -,033 -,054 ,262 (*) -,235
Med divorce conflict ,042 ,090 ,123 ,102
Good quality relation ex
no contact with ex -,046 ,129 -,083 ,245 **
Bad quality relation ex ,102 ,028 ,321 (*) -,151
OK quality relation ex ,148 -,213 ,052 -,025
age ,001 -,002 ,000 -,014 (*)
Partner in hh -,723 *** 1,242 *** -,812 *** 1,083 ***
Kids in hh -,001 ,108 -,189 ,027
Education high
Education low ,129 ,072 ,401 ** -,123
Education medium ,019 -,037 ,173 -,114
Conclusion 2• All process-indicators have some impact, though a new
partner remains very important• Women: mental health mainly related to issues of
relationship quality (conflict during divorce and current contact with ex). Men: wellbeing is more affected by circumstances involving power (taking the initiative) or facilitating closure (time since divorce, duration divorce process). Initiation and having no more contact: important for women to. So not clear cut.
• Indication that stress theories hold for men, but that chronic strain hypotheses are more relevant for women!
Limitations
• Crosssectional data, limited dataset• Dyadic data-structure not used (for further
analyses)• Only first-divorcees included• Further research needed on mediation, custody,
…
Strenghts• (a) focus on the impact of different
characteristics of the divorce process• (b) use of a divorce-specialized dataset, • (c) two distinct indicators of mental health
(depression as an indicator of distress, life satisfaction as an indicator of wellbeing),
• (d) some interesting conclusions on which further research can build.
Sara Symoens & Prof. Piet Bracke
Ghent University, department of SociologyKorte Meer 5, 9000 GhentBELGIUM
[email protected]@UGent.be