transacn vs relnship marketing
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
1/22
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
2/22
RelationshipMarketinga uecrea onan s ra egy mp emen a on
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
3/22
gen a
e
ang ng
ocus
n
ar et ng TraditionalversusRelationshipMarketing
Approach
Transactionalversus
Relationshi
Marketin
RelationshipMarketing:principleand
TheroleofRMtocompetitivemarketing
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
4/22
Asamerc antyou etter avea rien in
everytown
AnancientMiddleEasternproverb
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
5/22
e
ang ng
ocuso
ar e ng
Customer
Competitiveposition
focus
focus
Service
Sales
MarketingMix
focus
om nan
xity
Production
focus
focus Market
dominantCompl
Productfocus
Product
Pre1800s 1920s 1950s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000+
Time
Source:Christopheretal(1991)
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
6/22
Tra t ona
Mar et ngApproac
Product
Place
romo on
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
7/22
ProblemswithTraditionalMarketing
Itassumes
all
segments
of
customers
are
similarandmaybetreatedinastandardizedway
Itassumes
consumers
are
passive
absorbers
of
marketinginformation
Itassumesshorttermandoftenoneoff
transactionsbased
around
the
exchange
of
goodsformoney
Source:Christopheretal(1991)
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
8/22
e n t ono
e at ons p
ar et ng
Berry(1993)
from
a
serviceperspectiveRelationship
Marketing
is
attracting, maintaining
and
multi
serviceorganizationsenhancingcustomerrelationship
ac son roman
industrialmarketing
perspective
ar e ngconcen ra e owar s s rong, as ng
relationshipwithindividualaccounts
(1992)fromaservice
perspective
,
relationships
Gronos 1995 froma To identif andestablish maintainandenhance
networkperspective relationship
with
customers
and
other
stakeholders,
at
profitsothattheobjectivesofthepartnersinterestare
met,andthisachievedbyamutualexchangeandfulfillment
o o
Source:Christopheretal(1991
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
9/22
enera
o e
o
e a ons p
Marketing
Focuseson
arelationship
rather
than
transactional
approachtomarketing
Understandstheeconomicsofcustomerretention
Highlightsthecriticalroleofinternalmarketinginachievin
external
marketin
success
Extendstomorediversemarket
Recognizesthequality,customerservicesand
mar e ngnee
o
ec ose y
n egra e
Ensuresthatmarketingisconsideredacrossfunctionalcontext
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
10/22
e
ransac ona
o
e a ons p
Marketing
Emphasisonall
mar e oma nsan
customerretention MARKETING
Emphasison
customerac uisition
TRANSACTIONAL
MARKETING
Functionalitybased
Marketing
Crossfunctionality
basedMarketing Source:Christopher,Relationship
Marketing,
2002
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
11/22
Focusinvolume Focusonprofitable retention
Emphasizes productfeatures
Shorttimescale
Little
emphasis
on
customer
Emphasizescustomervalue
Longertermtimescalers
High
customer
service
services
Moderatecustomercontact
emphasis
Highcustomercontact
quality
quality
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
12/22
Principlesof
Relationship
Marketing
fundamentalgoal
of
Relationship
Marketing
present
Focusin
marketin
actionon
multi le
markets
SixMarketsModel
It must be crossfunctional
Marketingistooimportanttobelefttothe
marketingdepartment(DavidPackard)
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
13/22
T eRe at ons p
Mar et ng
Orientation
Quality
RELATIONSHIP
MARKETING
CustomerService
Marketing
Source:Christopheretal(1991)
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
14/22
BenefitsRM
to
the
firms
Towinanewcustomerismoreex ensivethanto
it
is
to
to
retain
an
existing
customer Establishedcustomerstendtobuymore(shareof
Satisfiedcustomersaremorelikelytoreferothers
Loyalcustomerscanbelesspricesensitiveandmaybelesslikelytodefectduetopriceincreases
Retainingcustomers
makes
market
entry
difficult
forcompetitors
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
15/22
TheRole
of
RM
to
Competitive
M rk tin tr t Value
as
the
central
role
to
develop
and
Stakeholdersinteractionprocess
eyva ueac v es
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
16/22
T eRo e
o
Customer
Va ue
Isthe
difference
between
the
prospective
customersevaluationofallbenefitsandallthe
costsofanofferingandtheperceivedalternatives.
Customerstendtobevaluemaximizers
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
17/22
ComponentofCustomerValuePro uct
Attributes
Service
Attributes
Perceivedbenefit Expected
Customer
Transaction
cost
e yc e
Cost
Risk
Source:Customer
Value
Toolkit,
1st Edition,
by
E.
Naumann andR.Kordupleski,1995
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
18/22
TheValue
Process
ValueDetermination
ValueCreation
ValueDelivery
ValueAssessment
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
19/22
Customer
retention
Employee
recruitment
FrameworkValue
determinationCustomersatisfaction
Employee
satisfactionCustomers:
Customermarkets
Employees:InternalMarket
Recruitment
Value
assessment
Value
creation
VALUE
PROCESSCustomer
Employeeretention
e erra ar et markets
Valuedelivery
attraction
Stakeholder
retention
Stakeholder
engagement
Externalstakeholders:
Shareholders
Otherinfluencemarkets
Suppliersandalliancemarkets
Stakeholder
satisfaction Source:Christopher,RelationshipMarketing,2002
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
20/22
Choiceof
Relationship
Strategy
Wierseman:
Providingcustomerswithreliableproductsorservicesat
competitive
prices
and
minimal
inconvenience Productleadership
Providingproductsthatcontinuallyredefinethestateofart
Sellingthecustomeratotalsolutionnotjustaproductor
service
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
21/22
e erences Chistopher,Martin,AdrianPayneandDavidballantyne (2002).Relationship
Marketing,creatingstakeholdervalueButterwor.thHeinemann.
Harwood,Tracy,T.
Garry
and
A
Broderick
(2008).
Relationship
Marketing:
Perpectives,DimensionsandContext,McGrawHill.
aumann, . n . or up es . ustomer a ue oo t, s e t on. out
WesternCollege\publishing.
-
7/28/2019 Transacn vs Relnship Marketing
22/22
g{t~