the value of reputationpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/fin 740_spring2020/week03/3b_reputation-ful… ·...

15
THE VALUE OF REPUTATION 1

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

THE VALUE OF REPUTATION

1

Page 2: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

Reputation■ Reputation is a valuable asset

■ Value of reputation is PV of cash flows earned when you continue to perform as promised

■ Cost of lost reputation is the PV of higher costs/lost revenue when firms are discovered to have cheated their investors, suppliers, employees, or customers.

– Counterparties stop doing business with the firm, or change the terms with which they are willing to continue to do business with the firm.

■ Reputation is difficult to build, easy to damage

■ Risks to reputation are important strategic risks

2

Page 3: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

What deters fraud: Three legs of a stool…

1. Regulations and regulators

2. Personal ethics and integrity

3. Market forces

– Repeat contracting and reputation

3

Obvious once you point it out, but underappreciated

Page 4: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

4

Xerox’s cumulated market-adjusted returnsJanuary 1997 – December 2006

6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations

10/8/99: Xerox warns 3rd qtr 1999 earnings will be short of projections

7/3/00: SEC starts formal investigation

4/10-12/02: Wells Notice; SEC files civil complaint

3/26/07: SEC enforcement action concluded

1/1/97: Violation period begins

Page 5: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

5

Price inflation during the violation period

Readjustment (back to $15.725b) = 23% of loss

Actual price path

}Losses due to legal penalties = $0.523b = 10% of loss

}

Reputation loss = $3.33b = 67% of loss}

Xerox’s reputation loss…

Hypothetical value without the short-term inflation from cooking the books

$11.864b

$16.864b

$15.725b

Page 6: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

6

Source: Karpoff, Lee, and Martin (Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2008)

Fines3% Class actions

6%

Readjustment25%

Reputation loss66%

Legal headaches are relatively smallThis is the

larger part of the story

Xerox’s experience is close to the norm:

Page 7: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

7

Source: Karpoff, Lee, and Martin (Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2008)

Fines3% Class actions

6%

Readjustment25%

Reputation loss66%

Legal headaches are relatively smallThis is the

larger part of the story

Xerox’s experience is close to the norm:

Page 8: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

Product recalls

8

Reputation loss = 77%

Sources: Jarrell and Peltzman (JPE 1985), Rubin, Murphy, and Jarrell (Regulation 1988), Barber and Darrough (JPE 1996)

Direct cost = 23%

Page 9: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

Frauds of private parties

9

Reputation loss = 93%

Sources: Karpoff and Lott (JLE 1993), Alexander (JLE 1999), Murphy, Shrieves, and Tibbs (JFQA 2009)

Direct cost = 7%

Page 10: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

Airplane crashes(when airline bears some blame)

10

Sources: Chalk (Econ Inq. 1986), Mitchell and Maloney (JLE 1989), Borenstein and Zimmerman (AER 1988)

Direct cost = 38%

Reputation loss = 62%

Page 11: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

Environmental violations

11

Direct cost = 100%

Sources: Klassen and McLaughlin (Mgmt. Sci. 1996), Karpoff, Lott, and Wehrly (JLE 2005)

Reputation loss = 0%

Page 12: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

Why is reputation important for some types of misconduct and not for others?

■ Product recalls, frauds

– Firm has repeat business with harmed parties, or potentially harmed parties

– Customers, suppliers, employees change the terms of contract to reflect the higher probability that they will be harmed

12

Environmental violations

Harmed parties do not in general do business with the firm

Parties with whom the firm does business suffer little or no direct harm

Customers, suppliers, employees have no incentive to change the terms of contract

Page 13: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

Reputation Loss■ V* - V = Readjustment + Fines + Lawsuits + Reputation

– V* = value without event– V = actual value– Readjustment = change in value from financial

restatement– Fines/Penalties – Lawsuits = judgements + settlements– Reputation

13

Page 14: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

Reputation Loss■ Fines and Lawsuits can be observed

■ Readjustment can be estimated

– Suppose PE = 20■ Firm reports EPS = $5 => Share Price = $100

■ Firm restates earnings to EPS =$4.50

■ Assume PE remains fixed => Share Pride = $90

■ Readjustment is $10*Shares outstanding

■ Reputation is the residual

– (V* - V) – (Readjustment + Fines + Lawsuits)

14

Page 15: THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… · 6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations 10/8/99:

Reputation Loss■ Need to estimate V*

– What firm value would have been without event

■ VR = Value after readjustment

■ Investors require return of r– Firm value grows at r per period

■ V* = VR(1+r)n

■ Need to estimate r

15