the university council of jamaica
TRANSCRIPT
The University Council of Jamaica6b Oxford Road, Kingston 5,
Jamaica W.I.Tel: (876) 929-7299, 906-8012
Fax: (876) 929-7312E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.ucj.org.jm
Copyright © 2014 The University Council of Jamaica
ISBN 978-976-95144-6-1
2
Copyright © 2014
The University Council of Jamaica
All rights reserved
Standards for Distance Education
Published by:
The University Council of Jamaica
6b Oxford Road
Kingston 5
Jamaica, W.I.
ISBN 978-976-95144-6-1
Printed by: Pear Tree Press Limited
3
Contents
Preface ...................................................................................................................... iv
Vision ......................................................................................................................... v
Mission ....................................................................................................................... v
Values ........................................................................................................................ vi
Functions ................................................................................................................. vii
Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1
Background ............................................................................................................... 1
Criterion 1: Governance ........................................................................................... 3
Criterion 2: Academic Programmes, Curricula and Materials .................................. 6
Criterion 3: Learner Services and Support ............................................................. 10
Criterion 4: Learner Assessment, Achievement and Satisfaction ......................... 13
Criterion 5: Technology Services ........................................................................... 15
Criterion 6: Human Resource Management ........................................................... 17
Criterion 7: Financial Management ....................................................................... 19
Criterion 8: Advertising and Promotion ................................................................. 21
Criterion 9: Research and Development ................................................................ 23
References ............................................................................................................... 25
Appendix: Glossary of Terms ................................................................................ 26
iv
PREFACE
Quality in tertiary education must follow standards. The issue of comparability across
programmes of study and institutions has increasingly garnered much attention, bringing into
focus the need to formulate academic standards. Quality is intertwined with good standards and
both are necessary if Jamaica’s tertiary education is to maintain international recognition and
help to maintain public confidence in the ability of the diverse tertiary institutions to adequately
prepare students for the workplace. As one of its main functions, the University Council of
Jamaica (UCJ) has been involved in developing academic standards in various subject disciplines
since 1997. Over the years, it has been found that when tertiary institutions are provided with
clear standards and guidelines, along with strong support, they do take steps to promote quality
in their academic programmes and institutional systems.
For the UCJ, the development of standards is achieved through the work of Standards
Committees. The broad-based committees with representation from academia, relevant industry
sectors, and subject specialists, nationally and internationally, are directed to formulate threshold
standards that will guide institutions in the development and evaluation of programmes. The
Committees are also directed to ensure that the standards set by the UCJ are aligned with
international standards and guidelines. The process of developing the standards for distance
education involved the holding of regular meetings of the Distance Education Standards
Committee, taking into account the needs of institutions, students, employers and the wider
Jamaican society. In order to maintain a participatory approach, the input of all tertiary
institutions and organizations with an interest in tertiary education is sought through the
circulation of the draft document for their comments. The responses received are used in
refining and finalizing the document. To ensure that the standards remain relevant and current,
the Committee recommended that they are revised on a regular basis, taking into account new
developments—national, regional, and international—that impact on the programmes offered by
tertiary institutions in Jamaica.
Gratitude is expressed to the following persons for serving on the Distance Education Standards
Committee and for contributing to the development of these standards: Professor Emerita Elsa
Leo-Rhynie, Former Principal, University of the West Indies, Mona Campus (Chair);
Mr Patrick Anglin, Senior Information Technology Officer, UWI Regional Headquarters;
Dr Jeannette Bartley-Bryan, Associate Vice-President, Office of Distance Learning, University
of Technology, Jamaica; Dr Dameon Black, Deputy President, University College of the
Caribbean; Mr Junior Martin, Head, Information and Communication Technology Department,
The Mico University College; Mrs Nan Ridgeway, Director of Accreditation, Distance
Education and Training Council (USA); and Professor Vivienne Roberts, Deputy Principal,
Open Campus, University of the West Indies.
The valuable comments provided by institutions and organizations are highly appreciated. The
contribution of the UCJ staff: Miss Grace Gordon, Director of Accreditation; Dr Dotlyn Minott,
Accreditation Officer; and Dr Angela Penny, Director, Boards of Studies, is also gratefully
acknowledged.
Yvonnette J. Marshall, Ed.D.
Executive Director
v
THE UNIVERSITY COUNCIL OF JAMAICA
The University Council of Jamaica (UCJ) was established in October, 1987 by the University
Council of Jamaica Act, 1987. It is a statutory body currently under the portfolio of the Minister
of Education. The UCJ is the national Quality Assurance Agency for tertiary education in
Jamaica.
VISION
The University Council of Jamaica aims to be a Centre of Excellence for quality assurance in
tertiary education in the Caribbean, maintaining a system that is responsive to national and
global changes while enhancing the development of a coherent Jamaican tertiary education
system and the country’s human resources.
MISSION
The mission of The University Council of Jamaica is to increase the availability of tertiary level
training in Jamaica through a robust quality assurance system that ensures excellence,
transparency, integrity and adherence to standards.
In fulfillment of its mission the Council seeks to achieve the following:
More efficient use of the existing tertiary and higher educational infrastructure in order to
optimize the limited financial resources;
Greater articulation between the institutions comprising the tertiary and higher education
system so as to achieve a more integrated framework; and
Facilitation of a system capable of responding more effectively to the country’s changing
manpower needs.
vi
VALUES
The values of The University Council of Jamaica are embedded in the following:
Holistic Growth
The Council is committed to the growth and development of individuals, tertiary institutions
and communities towards a culture of quality.
Integrity and Ethics
The Council believes in objectivity, honesty, and the establishment of trust and
confidentiality while consistently operating in an ethical manner.
Excellence The Council believes in the attainment of high quality standards in all aspects of its work.
Transparency
The Council will always exhibit openness and fairness in its operations.
Service
The Council is committed to providing high quality services to all stakeholders.
Respect
The Council believes in and values the diversity of all stakeholders.
vii
FUNCTIONS
The University Council of Jamaica is the External Quality Assurance (EQA) Agency for tertiary
education in Jamaica. The UCJ also functions as an awards and academic development body for
tertiary institutions and programmes in Jamaica. The following are the main functions of the
UCJ:
1. To register institutions offering tertiary education to ensure that certain minimum standards
are met with respect to:
governance of institutions;
management of institutions - strategic, operational and financial;
programme management - process for development, approval and review of
programmes, and monitoring of academic standards;
the overall management of quality within the institution;
adequacy and suitability of physical facilities with regard to student enrolment and
programmes offered;
scope, appropriateness and educational value of institutional programmes and
experiences;
qualifications, competence and adequacy of staff - academic (faculty), administrative
and technical;
adequacy of learning resources e.g. library, computing and laboratory, to support the
programmes; and
other operational factors.
2. To provide accreditation for degree and specialized programmes, as well as for institutions
by:
establishing and applying criteria for the accreditation of tertiary/higher educational
programmes and institutions;
guiding tertiary institutions in the development of their Internal Quality Assurance
(IQA) systems;
assisting tertiary institutions in the improvement of their educational offerings; and
encouraging and facilitating the development and delivery of programmes relevant to
national needs.
3. To assist in the development of tertiary institutions by providing professional advice and
services for the development and improvement of programmes.
4. To develop, on an on-going basis, threshold standards for different levels of qualifications
in various disciplines, at the tertiary level.
viii
5. To award degrees, diplomas and certificates to students who have pursued approved
programmes of study at approved tertiary institutions in Jamaica.
6. To study current issues in post-secondary education with a view to maintaining and
improving educational standards.
7. To establish equivalence and facilitate local recognition of foreign qualifications.
8. To assure the quality of programmes being offered in Jamaica by foreign institutions.
9. To provide appropriate public information about the institutions and programmes registered
and accredited by the Council.
10. To act as the national information centre for Jamaican tertiary qualifications.
11. To co-ordinate the activities of the Joint Committee for Tertiary Education (JCTE).
1
STANDARDS FOR DISTANCE EDUCATION
Introduction
This document constitutes standards developed by the University Council of Jamaica, for the
design, management, and delivery of programmes by distance education at the tertiary level. It
serves to guide institutions that wish to develop new programmes or improve existing programmes
being delivered at a distance. The standards, which identify the minimum acceptable requirements
for distance education programmes, will also facilitate the evaluation of institutions and their
extension sites, by the UCJ for accreditation purposes. These standards are to be used in
conjunction with the relevant discipline specific standards at different programme levels.
The standards set demanding but realistic thresholds, which are intended to inform, encourage, and
challenge institutions to pursue continuous improvement in the management of quality. They will
assist institutions to focus on their mission, the planning of their curricula, the quality and
development of staff, and the delivery and evaluation of instruction via distance education. To this
end, institutions should develop their own quality assurance systems and procedures for quality and
standards.
Background
Distance education is not a new phenomenon but with the developments in information and
communication technologies, it has emerged as an increasingly important vehicle to transform
teaching and learning methods and increase access to tertiary education around the world, including
Jamaica. In recent times, there has been an increase in interest by tertiary-level institutions in
Jamaica to offer programmes by distance learning in a range of subject areas and even at the higher
degree levels. However, some institutions face challenges in assuring quality in distance education
and concerns exist as to whether these programmes are comparable in standards to those offered in
the conventional face-to-face setting.
Distance education is described as a formal education process in which the learner may be separated
from the instructor in space and/or time. This may cover a range where all courses are offered fully
online to blended learning. Distance education has evolved over time from correspondence courses
and use of printed materials, to learning that uses information and communication technologies or
e-learning. Technology-enhanced learning is now embedded in the academic offerings of many
tertiary education institutions, whether campus-based or delivered through blended, online, and
other distance learning modes.
Distance education is intended to offer useful learning opportunities to those persons who would
not be able to attend a physical campus, for reasons such as distance and the need for flexibility.
Such learning opportunities may be provided by existing and established tertiary institutions where
both distance and conventional modes of instruction occur, or by institutions operating as virtual
institutions. The popularity of the various distance delivery modes which allow for “anytime,
anywhere” study is offset by the caution that, if distance education is unregulated, it could be a
serious threat to the quality of tertiary education. The UCJ’s mandate as an external quality
2
assurance agency means that it must develop, communicate, and use a set of standards for distance
education to ensure that quality is preserved and ensure that such programmes are viewed as
comparable to those in institutions where instruction is offered face-to-face. The UCJ holds
distance education programmes to the same high standards as those delivered by face-to-face
modality.
For the purpose of this document, a Standard is defined as a criterion against which an outcome
can be assessed. The distance education standards are arranged under nine criteria, namely:
1. Governance
2. Academic Programmes, Curricula and Materials
3. Learner Services and Support
4. Learner Assessment, Achievement and Satisfaction
5. Technology Services
6. Human Resource Management
7. Financial Management
8. Advertising and Promotion
9. Research and Development
The scope of each Criterion is expanded as a series of requirements—criteria standards, indicators,
and evidence. The Criteria Standards provide a definition of the Criterion and represent the
dimension of practice. The Indicators are delineated for the criteria standards and articulate the
considerations to fulfil the standards. The Evidence represents examples of the
documents/records/interactions that the visiting team from the UCJ will examine to inform its
judgment of whether the institution/programme meets the Criterion.
The standards are not intended to be so prescriptive that they stifle innovation, but institutions must
demonstrate a sufficient level of conformity to the standards. In principle, it is expected that
institutions will explicate how they meet the standards in their self-study reports.
3
STANDARDS FOR DISTANCE EDUCATION
Criterion 1 GOVERNANCE
Scope The institution has clearly defined its vision, mission, goals, governance structure,
and management system that incorporate the entire institution, inclusive of extension
sites, and emphasize commitment to quality in teaching and learning.
Criterion 1: Governance
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
1.1 The institution has a clearly
defined vision and mission that
are supported by defined goals
within the context of tertiary
education and national
development.
1.1.1 Vision and mission statements are clearly
defined and communicated to all relevant
stakeholders.
1.1.2 Goals are clearly defined, related to the
mission, and relevant to the needs of society.
Mission statement,
vision statement,
strategic plan,
handbooks.
1.2 The institution’s governing
body and senior administrators
have a sound reputation, a
record of integrity, and ethical
conduct in professional
activities, business operations
and relations.
1.2.1 Policies for the maintenance of ethical
standards in all aspects of the institution’s
operations are documented.
1.2.2 Periodic evaluation of the effectiveness of
institutional leadership and governance
systems.
Terms of reference,
brochures, charter,
board documents,
strategic plan,
technology plan, policy
documents.
Performance appraisals
for administrators,
satisfaction surveys.
1.3 The institution’s governing
body and senior administrators
have appropriate qualifications
and experience for their
positions and roles.
1.3.1 The governing body and senior administrators
have sufficient knowledge and experience in
one or more aspects of educational
administration, finance, teaching/ learning,
ICT, and distance study.
1.3.2 The governing body and senior administrators
demonstrate the ability to oversee institutional
operations.
Job descriptions, policy
manuals, operational
plan, curriculum vitae.
1.4 The institution has clearly
stated the fiduciary
responsibilities to be fulfilled
by the governing body to
assure integrity in its
operations.
1.4.1 Statement of fiduciary responsibility that
requires the governing body to respect ethical
standards, act in good faith, and with a
reasonable degree of care for the finances, and
legal requirements of the institution.
Terms of reference,
policy manual.
Intellectual property
rights policy.
4
Criterion 1: Governance
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
1.4.2 A conflict of interest policy for the governing
body is defined, documented and
communicated.
1.4.3 Legal provisions to protect the intellectual
property rights of staff and learners.
1.5 The institution’s governing
body has the responsibility to
formulate policies and exercise
authority over its operations
and the implementation of
academic programmes.
1.5.1 Policies clearly delineate the duties and
responsibilities of the governing body and
senior administrators.
1.5.2 There is a wide representation of stakeholders
in policy formulation and decision making and
a process exists for continuous feedback.
Organization chart,
policies, operational
and strategic plan,
operations manual,
minutes of board
meetings, sub-
committees and
management
committees.
1.6 The institution has a senior
administrator who is
responsible for the overall
operation of the institution; a
senior academic officer
responsible for the
teaching/learning systems;
and adequate technical staff to
facilitate effective distance
education.
1.6.1 A senior administrator with full time
responsibility for the implementation of
policies and day-to-day operations of the
institution is in place.
1.6.2 A senior academic officer has the
responsibility for the development of
programmes and for monitoring academic
standards in teaching and learning, and
academic staff.
1.6.3 A senior administrator is responsible for
technology development in the institution.
Organizational chart,
strategic plan, job
descriptions, resumes.
1.7 The institution has a plan and a
planning and evaluation
process that address the
institution’s academic,
physical, human resource,
financial development,
continuous improvement, and
sustainability for distance
education.
1.7.1 A strategic plan, with related sub-plans and
planning and evaluation processes, are in
place to guide the institution’s long term
growth and development.
1.7.2 An operational plan is used to guide
day-to-day operations.
Strategic plan with
related sub-plans that
refer to technology (e.g.
technology, acquisition,
ICT (security),
operational plan,
planning documents,
TORs for committees,
succession plan.
1.8 The institution has a robust and
effective internal quality
assurance (IQA) system that
ensures quality across the
entire institution, inclusive of
extension sites, to facilitate
effective distance education.
1.8.1 The IQA system is documented and
functioning consistently, and is supported by
written policies.
1.8.2 Internal mechanisms for monitoring and
implementing policies and plans are in place.
1.8.3 All relevant stakeholders, including staff,
Internal quality criteria,
research data/reports,
flow charts.
Operations manual,
minutes of committee
meetings, approvals of
various committees,
5
Criterion 1: Governance
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
administrators, faculty, and learners are
aware of internal quality assurance systems
and procedures.
1.8.4 Institutional research, reviews, and audits are
conducted on an on-going basis for
continuous improvement.
feedback (internal/
external).
Policy and procedural
manuals, monitoring
plan.
1.9 The institution has a clear
policy on partnerships and
collaborations for the
development and delivery of
quality distance education
programmes.
1.9.1 Collaborative arrangements and partnerships
with public/private, governmental and non-
governmental agencies are established based
on a clear policy statement
Policy and procedural
manual, MOUs,
partnership agreements.
6
Criterion 2 ACADEMIC PROGRAMMES, CURRICULA AND MATERIALS Scope Academic programmes reflect the mission and goals of the institution. Learning
outcomes are clearly stated and indicate the benefits for reasonably diligent learners.
There are clear processes and procedures for programme and curricula development
and approval.
Criterion 2: Academic Programmes, Curricula and Materials
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
2.1. The institution offers
academic programmes that
are aligned to its mission and
goals.
2.1.1. Goals and objectives of academic programmes
are consistent with the institution’s mission and
goals.
2.1.2. Processes and procedures for programme and
curricula development and approval are clearly
specified and meet the requirements of the
external review authorities.
Programme design and
development plans,
mission statement,
institution’s teaching
and learning plan,
curriculum
development policies,
minutes of academic
board meetings.
2.2 The institution has clearly
defined learning outcomes for
all its programmes.
2.2.1 Learning outcomes are stated in terms of the
knowledge, attitudes, skills and competencies
to be attained by the learners.
2.2.2 Learning outcomes are aligned to the learners’
needs and are attainable through electronic or
other distance modalities.
2.2.3 Learning outcomes are designed and developed
based on the data on the learner profile of
needs, expectations and learning styles
preferences.
Programme and course
documents,
handbooks, needs
survey analysis;
learning and teaching
plan, curriculum
development, online
presence, reports from
learner surveys.
2.3 The institution develops,
delivers and reviews the
curriculum in accordance with
established standards.
2.3.1 Curriculum (expected outcomes, content,
teaching/learning strategies, resources and
assessment methods) matches the standards
established by national and international
bodies.
2.3.2 Course materials are internally tested with
reference to the objectives of programmes and
learners’ needs, prior to final release.
2.3.3 Course materials are periodically reviewed
with reference to user friendliness,
appropriateness, currency and effectiveness.
Learning and teaching
plan, curriculum and
course development
policy, documentation
of arrangements for
teaching support,
academic review
policies.
External examiners’
reports and other
assessment reports,
minutes from
curriculum
development and
quality assurance
committees.
7
Criterion 2: Academic Programmes, Curricula and Materials
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
2.4 The institution has policies to
ensure that academic
programme content is based
on sound research and
practice; and reflects current
knowledge and practices in
the disciplines.
2.4.1 Programme curricula reflect current
developments and knowledge in the
disciplines.
2.4.2 Clear procedures and timelines for programme
review by relevant communities of interest
(e.g. advisory councils, employer groups etc.)
are developed and implemented.
2.4.3 Programmes are developed based on needs
analyses, market research, liaison with
industry, review of national priorities, and
professional requirements.
Programme/course
design and
development
documents.
Curriculum
development and
accreditation
documents, academic
review reports, needs
survey data.
2.5 The institution develops
comprehensive course
instructional package that
provides learners with
relevant, accurate, and
essential information to
achieve the stated learning
outcomes.
2.5.1 Instructional packages comprise
essential course information, activity
schedule, instructional and learning
strategies, study guides, media resources and
other supporting, materials designed for the
learner.
2.5.2 Instructional packages reflect the scope and
structure of course components in relation to
stated learning outcomes.
2.5.3 Instructional packages are reviewed, evaluated
and updated periodically through a systematic
process.
Instructional package,
sample logs of
interaction between
learners and
instructors, minutes of
curriculum and course
development
committee meetings,
academic review
reports.
2.6 The institution has structured
mechanisms to obtain
feedback from learners,
instructors, employers, and
the community.
2.6.1 Programme and course evaluations and
monitoring are undertaken at regular intervals.
2.6.2 Outcomes of evaluations are used to make
necessary changes and improvements to
programme design and delivery.
Academic review
policies, data from
surveys of learners
and employers.
2.7 The institution has a
programme/course design
process that is guided by a
team of reputable specialists
who ensure currency and
relevance.
2.7.1 Programme structure and materials are
developed and reviewed by specialists in
consultation with advisory councils and
professional groups.
2.7.2 Course development is based on a plan that
details the process, timeline, financial
resources, infrastructural requirements,
instructional resources and roles and
responsibilities of relevant stakeholders.
Teaching and learning
plan, course
materials, course
design committees
minutes, sample logs
of interaction with
learners, employer
survey data,
training materials and
feedback data.
8
Criterion 2: Academic Programmes, Curricula and Materials
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
2.7.3 Mechanisms are in place to ensure content
developers, technical and support staff, and
others involved in course design, development,
review, and production are appropriately
qualified and competent.
Minutes of academic
boards meetings,
quality assurance
framework; course
development plans.
2.8 The institution designs and
develops course and
instructional templates that
accommodate different
learning styles and use of
inclusive language.
2.8.1 Course templates are designed, developed,
and reviewed with reference to gender
inclusive language and learning styles.
2.8.2 Members of the course development and
delivery teams are trained to utilize templates
and standards for instructional design and
development.
2.8.3 Instructional design reflects consistent layout
and design; clear organization and
presentation of information; consistent and
easy to use navigation; and aesthetically
pleasing design and graphics.
2.8.4 Design templates for courses are clear on:
- how learners get started and where to find
various course components
- the purpose and structure of the course
- etiquette expectations for online
discussions, email and other forms of
communication.
2.8.5 Mechanisms are in place to systematically
record and assess learning strategies and
approaches to instructional designs.
2.8.6 Course materials make provision for
accessibility, including vision and hearing
impairments.
2.8.7 Course materials are presented in a format that
makes it easy for students to navigate and
interpret the content presented.
2.8.8 Course materials are formatted with the font,
size, colour, spacing, and contrast between
text, graphics, and backgrounds in accordance
with international best practices.
Curriculum, course
materials, information
package, minutes of
the course planning
and design
committees, sample
logs of interaction
with learners, staff and
course developers,
templates.
Disabilities or
accessibility policy
and guidelines, end
user interview logs.
9
Criterion 2: Academic Programmes, Curricula and Materials
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
2.9 The institution designs
programmes, instructional
materials, and activities for
the independent learning and
collaborative skills,
integrating and facilitating
learner success.
2.9.1 Programme design includes activities for and
self-monitoring by learners.
2.9.2 Programme design includes activities for
reflective learning, collaborative learning,
self-assessment, peer-assessment, feedback,
and self-monitoring.
2.9.3 Course and/or institutional policies with
which the student is expected to comply are
clearly stated, or a link to current policies is
provided.
2.9.4 Pre-requisite knowledge in the discipline
and/or any required competencies are clearly
stated.
Course materials,
information package,
minutes of the course
planning and design
committees, sample
logs of interaction
with learners, staff and
course developers.
Assessment and
evaluation schemes,
course assignments
and question papers.
2.10 The institution designs
programmes and courses
that reflect its policy on
ICT.
2.10.1 Learner-friendly guidelines regarding the use
of technology resources and the minimum
specifications required for each course/
programme are provided.
2.10.2 Programme/course content and learning
resources are delivered using appropriate,
accessible and reliable technology.
2.10.3 Ease of use and level of technologies available
to learners to achieve the expected learning
outcomes is carefully analyzed.
2.10.4 Minimum technical skills expected of learners
are clearly stated.
2.10.5 Design and scheduling of programme/course
activities address the needs of distance
learners and their access to technology and
other facilities.
2.10.6 Choice of media and the technologies to be
used are appropriately integrated in the course
design.
Course materials,
minutes of course
planning and design
committees, corporate
plan and ICT policy.
Findings of need
surveys and learner
feedback.
Sample logs of
interaction with
learners, staff and
course developers.
Technology profiles of
the institution, user
records, information
packages or brochures,
interaction with
teachers, staff and
learners, course
outlines.
10
Criterion 3 LEARNER SERVICES AND SUPPORT Scope The institution provides educational, administrative, and support services to ensure
that learners are fully informed about the guidelines, rules and regulations governing
programmes of study and are therefore able to make informed decisions, from the
time of application to the point of completion of study.
Criterion 3: Learner Services and Support
Criteria Standards Indicators Source of Evidence
3.1 The institution has policies for
admission, tuition, and the
nature of educational services
and support provided, that are
clearly defined and
communicated to prospective
and registered learners. The
policies are in keeping with
ethical standards of practice.
3.1.1 Requirements for qualification and
procedures for application, admission and
registration are clearly defined and
communicated to prospective learners.
3.1.2 Rules and regulations pertaining to
admission and/or registration as well as
maintenance of registration are
communicated and observed.
3.1.3 Procedures for the payment, collection,
cancellation and refund of tuition fees are
clearly stated and communicated to learners.
3.1.4 Clear guidelines for face-to-face and/or
online contact as required by programmes
are available and communicated to learners.
3.1.5 Appropriate training (web-based/ face-to-
face) and support are provided to learners.
Student services and
support plan.
On-line presence,
prospectus, handbooks,
advertisements and
other promotional
materials.
Financial code,
procedures for
managing fees (sub-set
of financial code),
communication plan
(Student interaction
guidelines).
Training plan, training
manuals, reports from
training provided to
learners.
3.2 The institution has clearly
outlined and communicated the
rights and responsibilities of
learners.
3.2.1 Facilities exist to encourage learner
development in various aspects of the
institution’s operations.
3.2.2 Learners have the opportunity to participate
in the institution’s governance.
Learner development
plan.
Learners’ organisations,
learners’ representation
on governance
committees.
3.3 The institution has mechanisms
and strategies for clear and
frequent communication, and
interaction among learners and
between learners and staff,
administrators, and support
personnel.
3.3.1 Communication with learners is frequent,
clear and comprehensive.
3.3.2 Learners’ enquiries, comments, complaints,
and grievances are addressed on a timely
basis.
3.3.3 Opportunities are provided, for learners to
interact, work cooperatively, and participate
in activities (voluntary and compulsory).
Minutes of
participant/staff liaison
committees, handbooks/
guidelines and
regulations,
communication plan,
learner logs, help desk
tracking,
communication plan
(specifying clear
11
Criterion 3: Learner Services and Support
Criteria Standards Indicators Source of Evidence
3.3.4 Learners are informed about the
opportunities available to support their
learning.
3.3.5 Learners’ opinions and evaluations are
sought and used in the review process for
administration, curriculum development and
support services.
“accessible time
frames” for queries,
feedback and other
interaction).
Online discussion fora
(discussion groups, list
servers, etc.), online
chat rooms, video
conferencing, web
conferencing.
Assessment guidelines
and regulations.
Course evaluation
document (student,
lecturer, and
administration), course
review document and
other feedback
documents.
3.4 The institution has learner
services that are commensurate
with the learner population to
adequately support learners as
they pursue their programmes
of study
3.4.1 Efforts are made to accommodate learners
of differing abilities and aspirations.
3.4.2 Counselling and academic advising are
available to assist learners in relation to
their programmes of study or where
progress may be unsatisfactory.
3.4.3 Faculty and staff are sufficiently prepared
and conversant with the technology to
facilitate learners in their programmes of
study.
3.4.4 Learners have access to appropriate
technology to maximize the teaching
learning environment and maintain contact
with the institution.
3.4.5 Provisions exist to provide learners with
advice concerning support services such as
financial aid guidance, counselling services
(including health counselling, study skills
and other services when required to be
resident by the institution), placement and
career guidance and alumni services.
Learner profiles,
in-course advising plan.
Feedback documents.
Faculty profile; staff
development plan.
Technology plan,
feedback documents.
Help desk (ICT,
finance, learner
services).
Library website,
subscription to
bibliographic databases
and online journals.
12
Criterion 3: Learner Services and Support
Criteria Standards Indicators Source of Evidence
3.4.6 Learners have easy access to relevant and
satisfactory learning resources such as
library resources.
3.4.7 Systems are in place to evaluate learners’
use of the library and other available
learning resources.
3.5 The institution has procedures
in place to accurately and
securely maintain learners’
records, with access available
only to approved individuals.
3.5.1 Learners’ records are securely held.
3.5.2 Mechanisms are in place to ensure
confidentiality of learners’ records.
3.5.3 Procedures exist for the proper disposal and
archiving of records.
3.5.4 Learners have access to their records on a
timely basis.
3.5.5 Learners’ requests for academic
records/documents (e.g. transcripts) are
responded to in a timely manner.
Records management
policy, data protection
policy, ICT security
policy.
Records management
policy, retention policy,
archival policy.
Feedback documents.
13
Criterion 4 LEARNER ASSESSMENT, ACHIEVEMENT AND SATISFACTION Scope The institution has a learner assessment process that is transparent, fair and
consistent, properly managed, and reflects institutional, national, and international
standards.
Criterion 4: Learner Assessment, Achievement and Satisfaction
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
4.1 The institution has clearly
stated policies regarding
assessment including:
a. proportional allocations to
formative and summative
assessment;
b. Transparency, fairness,
and consistency in the
assessment system.
4.1.1 Written policies for learner assessment are
available and communicated.
4.1.2 A range of assessment tools are identified
for use in formative and summative
assessment.
4.1.3 Clearly stated guidelines governing the
proportional allocation to formative and
summative assessment are in place.
4.1.4 Learner assessments are reviewed and used
to inform curricular improvement,
instructional methods, and faculty
development.
Rules and
regulations/student
handbook/faculty
manual, assessment
policy.
Samples of
assessments, feedback
for formative
assessments.
Rules and
regulations/student
handbook/faculty
manual.
Activities/Minutes of
meetings of curriculum
committee or other
mechanisms.
4.2 The institution has in place
assessment guidelines for
courses and programmes.
4.2.1 Orientation programmes for both faculty
and learners include sessions on assessment.
4.2.2 Assessment tasks adequately address stated
objectives /learning outcomes.
4.2.3 Assessment guidelines are communicated to
learners and adhered to by faculty members.
Course outlines /tables
of specifications/
samples of assessments,
rules and regulations/
student handbook/
faculty manual,
assessment policy,
schedule/ agenda of
orientation events.
4.3 The institution has a policy to
ensure timely grading and
prompt feedback on
assessments.
4.3.1 Scheduling and grading of the formative
assessment allows for feedback to the
learner and triggers remedial action and/or
counselling.
Scheduling of
assessments, schedules
for submission of
grades, log books with
recorded grades.
4.4 The institution has internal
quality assurance guidelines
to ensure that assessment
tools and marking schemes
meet the required standard.
4.4.1 Assessment tools and processes,
comparable to those used by campus based
courses and programmes, are in place.
Quality assurance
guidelines, marking
schemes.
14
Criterion 4: Learner Assessment, Achievement and Satisfaction
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
4.5 The institution has systems in
place to protect the security of
the assessment process.
4.5.1 Arrangements are in place for secure
storage of examination papers and results.
4.5.2 Adequate security systems and procedures
are in place for assessment by distance.
4.5.3 Integrity of the certification process is
ensured.
Examination
procedures,
examination security
provisions.
4.6 The institution encourages
use of assessment rubrics and
detailed marking schemes by
faculty and examiners.
4.6.1 Expectations and guidelines for assessment
are documented and shared with examiners.
Examination
regulations,
examination papers,
marking schemes,
assessment policy.
4.7 The institution observes
ethical practices and has in
place codes of conduct to
govern all assessment.
4.7.1 Expectations, guidelines and regulations,
ethical practices, codes of conduct, along
with applicable sanctions for violations are
communicated to learners and staff.
4.7.2 Disciplinary procedures for violating
practices and codes of conduct are clearly
stated and implemented in a timely manner.
Examination
regulations, ethical
practices and codes of
conduct, application of
sanctions.
4.8 The institution has systems
and procedures to record
grades in a prescribed and
timely manner without breach
of confidentiality.
4.8.1 Grades are communicated to learners in
confidence, in a timely manner, and in the
prescribed fashion.
Records of grades,
assessment policy.
4.9 The institution undertakes
satisfaction surveys on a
regular basis to evaluate its
operation and services.
4.9.1 Surveys are administered with adequate
participation of learners.
4.9.2 Survey results are used to review, evaluate,
and improve programmes.
Results of learner
satisfaction surveys.
Use of survey results in
minutes and reports of
curriculum committees.
4.10 The institution produces and
submits annual reports to the
governing body.
4.10.1 Systems and procedures for record keeping,
research, and production of annual reports
are in place.
4.10.2 Annual reports contain recorded and
researched data on:
a. Completion, retention and progression
rates
b. Results from surveys of graduate
employment
Annual reports, survey
reports, student records.
15
Criterion 5 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
Scope The institution has procedures for determining and managing the appropriate set of
tools used to process and communicate information. These tools include hardware,
software and communication media, as well as all associated technologies which
utilize computer logic in order to operate.
Criterion 5: Technology Services
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
5.1 The institution has systems to
govern the effective use of
Information and
Communication Technologies
(ICT) in support of distance
education.
5.1.1 Measures to govern the appropriate use of
ICT resources in relation to stated objectives
are in place and observed.
5.1.2 Measures that govern the security of ICT
resources against threats from within or
outside the institution are implemented.
5.1.3 Systems and procedures are in place to protect
the data stored by ICT resources from
unauthorised access, use, transmission,
modification, or any other violation of the
right to privacy of the persons who are the
subject of such data.
Acceptable use policy;
electronic mail and
messaging policy.
ICT security policy.
Data protection policy.
5.2 The institution has systems
that are appropriate and use
reliable and modern
technologies, to govern the
development and delivery of
course materials.
5.2.1 A clear policy that governs the delivery of
instructional materials is in place.
5.2.2 Online materials are delivered using the most
reliable and current technologies available,
based on annual reviews.
5.2.3 Quality of the instructional materials meets
the standards and benchmarks that govern
material preparation.
Instructional materials
distribution guide (for
digital content).
Assessment of delivery
technologies document.
Indication that
international standards
are met (e.g. review
document).
5.3 The institution has systems to
govern the development and
approval of programmes that
utilize appropriate and
modern technologies.
5.3.1 Policies that govern the appropriateness and
scope of the development of all learning
resources are documented.
5.3.2 Policies that specify the effective use of
appropriate teaching and learning resources,
to include all electronic media and other
supplemental instructional materials involved
in the design of all course materials, are
documented and communicated.
5.3.3 Policies that specify student access to learning
resources and library facilities are developed,
documented and communicated.
Procedure for the
acquisition of an
appropriate Learning
Management System
(LMS); initial LMS
Review document
(LMS); procedures for
annual review;
annual review
document.
Annual environmental
scan document.
16
Criterion 5: Technology Services
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
5.4 The institution has
appropriate technologies that
are accessible and will
maximize the interaction
between the institution and
the learner while improving
the instructional and
educational services.
5.4.1 Policies that govern the utilization of
technology to facilitate learners’ access to
instructional materials, tutors, and technical
support are in place.
5.4.2 Modern communication systems that foster
access and quality interaction between the
institution and the learner are implemented.
Annual review of
telecommunications
systems; annual review
of available bandwidth;
action plan for
bandwidth
management, policy
documents.
5.5 The institution implements,
maintains and manages
equipment and facilities that
support the growth and
development of programmes.
5.5.1 Clear policies that govern the implementation
of appropriate plans that guide the budgetary
support for the acquisition and maintenance of
equipment and facilities to support
programmes are available.
5.5.2 Appropriate strategies for the management
and maintenance of equipment to ensure non-
obsolescence are implemented.
Asset acquisition
policy.
Asset management
policy; depreciation
policy.
5.6 The institution protects the
information systems that
houses mission critical
information such as learner
data, financial data, and other
administrative data.
5.6.1 Procedures to be followed to restore
information technology services in the event
of outages or disasters are clearly outlined and
communicated.
Business continuity
plan; disaster recovery
plan (may be a subset
of the business
continuity plan);
protocol for off-site
storage; back-up and
restoration procedures;
back-up and restoration
reports; procedures for
hosted solutions.
17
Criterion 6 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Scope The institution has sufficient, qualified and experienced academic, administrative,
technical and support staff to meet the mission of the institution for effective and
efficient services to learners.
Criterion 6: Human Resource Management
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
6.1 The institution has a critical
core of qualified full-time
academic staff to take
responsibility for programme
development, delivery,
management and related
academic issues.
Part-time (adjunct) academic
staff members are qualified
and involved in programme
development, delivery and
learner assessment.
6.1.1 The Human Resource plan is clearly
documented.
6.1.2 Academic staff members are appropriately
qualified in the discipline and teaching area.
6.1.3 All staff members are proficient in the use
of tools for the management and delivery of
courses.
6.1.4 Steps are taken to maintain the
learner/instructor ratios and academic staff
workload at the planned level.
6.1.5 Academic staff assignment to distance
learning programmes does not result in
work overload.
6.1.6 Staff records are maintained in a secure and
confidential manner.
6.1.7 Academic staff members are involved in
shaping programmes and designing
assessments, and consult with technical staff
about the viability of offerings.
6.1.8 Academic staff members maintain contact
with business/professionals/industry.
6.1.9 Compliance with the legal and statutory
requirements pertaining to staff benefits and
welfare is documented.
6.1.10 Compliance with occupational, health and
safety regulations.
Corporate/strategic
plan; institutional
planning and HR
documents (including
recruitment, retention,
promotion,
performance
management, career
development, records,
individual staff
profiles, contracts),
staff handbook.
Resumes, transcripts,
job descriptions, signed
contracts, adjunct
academic staff policy,
staff policy.
Staff policy,
timetables, staff
schedules, employee
records; TORs for
academic committees;
minutes of meetings.
Subscriptions,
registration certificates,
correspondence,
membership in
professional
organizations.
Staff policy,
compliance
certificates/receipts.
occupational health
and safety policy,
compliance
certificates/schedules.
18
Criterion 6: Human Resource Management
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
6.2 The institution has, available to
all its locations, a core of
qualified technical,
administrative, and ancillary
staff to meet the institution’s
objectives for student learning
at all its locations.
6.2.1 Complement of administrative staff is
sufficient to coordinate and supervise the
various activities of the institution.
6.2.2 Administrative staff members have the
relevant skills and experience to deal with
the learners, academic staff and the
technical and support staff of the institution.
6.2.3 Technical staff members are appropriately
qualified and experienced to support
distance delivery of programmes.
6.2.4 Ancillary staff members are appropriately
qualified and experienced to manage the
institution’s facilities, and to support student
welfare activities.
Staff policy, efficiency
plan.
Resumes, job
descriptions,
performance
appraisals, student
satisfaction rating,
efficiency plan,
training plan.
Maintenance plan,
security service plan,
contracts for service,
food handlers
certificates.
6.3 The institution has in place a
clearly documented Staff
Development Policy and
activities.
6.3.1 Academic staff members are continuously
trained with respect to learner needs,
instructional approaches and techniques, use
of appropriate instructional technology and
institution policies.
6.3.2 Academic staff members are appropriately
oriented and trained to provide instruction
in a distance learning environment.
6.3.3 Administrative staff members are trained to
satisfy the unique needs of learners in a
distance learning environment.
6.3.4 Academic staff members are actively
engaged in scholarly activities relevant to
the discipline to improve teaching and
learning.
6.3.5 Academic and administrative staff members
maintain membership in professional
organizations.
Staff development
policy, staff
development plans.
Training schedules for
staff development
activities, registers of
staff development
seminars/workshops.
Registration
certificates/ manuals
from seminars/
workshops, research
papers, research
publications, journals.
Registration
certificates in
professional
associations, training
plan, conference
registration forms.
6.4 The institution has clear and
consistent policies and
procedures to evaluate staff
performance.
6.4.1 Documented policy for the evaluation of
staff performance.
6.4.2 Staff members receive feedback on
performance on a regular basis.
6.4.3 Results from academic, administrative and
technical staff evaluations are used for
continuous improvement initiatives.
Evaluation policy,
signed performance
appraisal/evaluation
instruments, feedback
system for continuous
improvement,
completed evaluation
forms from learners
and evaluation reports.
19
Criterion 7 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Scope The institution has systems for sound financial management, evidenced by current
audited financial statements, showing financially viability and that it can meet its
financial obligations to provide quality distance education programmes and services.
Criterion 7: Financial Management
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
7.1 The institution’s financial
procedures comply with the
requirements of national
financial regulatory bodies.
7.1.1 Financial statements are prepared and
reviewed in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
7.1.2 Financial statements are audited in
conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
7.1.3 Financial procedures are clearly stated and
adhered to by the institution.
Corporate/strategic
plan, annual reports,
audit reports, audited
financial statements,
monthly financial
statements, finance
committee reports,
management reports,
Board minutes,
compliance certificates,
procedures manual.
7.2 The institution has safeguards
in place to prevent
unauthorized access to online
and onsite financial
information.
7.2.1 Internal audit mechanism and an external
audit schedule are in place.
7.2.2 Internal auditing trails and controls are in
place to ensure finances are properly
managed, monitored, and protected.
7.2.3 Security systems are in place to deter theft,
sabotage or other threats.
Audited financial
statements, procedures
manual, audit reports,
data protection policy,
ICT security policy.
Audit documents, audit
schedules, policy and
procedures manual,
financial security plan,
audit schedules, data
protection policy, IT
security policy.
7.3 The institution demonstrates
that current and future budgets
are sufficient to accomplish its
mission, goals and approved
activities, particularly those
required for distance
education.
7.3.1 Annual budgets are prepared and approved.
7.3.2 Relevant internal stakeholders are included
in the budgeting process.
7.3.3 Budgetary provisions for distance education
are adequate.
Corporate/strategic
plan, approved budgets,
financial allocations,
resource allocation to
meet needs of distance
education; budget
submissions.
7.4 The institution earmarks
specific budget allocation for
the acquisition, maintenance
and enhancement of the
technology resources required
for quality distance learning.
7.4.1 Budget for distance technology resources is
prepared and reviewed regularly.
7.4.2 Budget allocations for distance technology
are prepared and regularly reviewed.
Corporate/strategic
plan, approved
technology budget.
Depreciation policy,
asset acquisition policy,
asset management
policy.
20
Criterion 7: Financial Management
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
7.5 The institution has qualified
and experienced persons to
oversee the fiscal and
budgeting processes.
7.5.1 Administrative staff members are in place to
monitor effective financial operations with at
least one person qualified and able to prepare
accurate financial reports in a timely manner.
Resumes, job
description, policy and
procedures manuals.
Procedures for
management of
receivables and
payables, policies,
compliance reports and
detailed current
operating reports.
21
Criterion 8 ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION Scope All advertisements, promotional literature, and online presence concerning the
institution, its staff, programmes and services, or the career opportunities for
graduates are current, accurate, reliable and clearly indicate that training is offered at
a distance.
Criterion 8: Advertising and Promotion
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
8.1 The institution provides
current, reliable, and accurate
information to the public,
graduates and prospective
learners.
8.1.1 Institutional brochures and online presence
gives current information that clearly and
accurately describes the institution, its
programmes and services.
8.1.2 Information to prospective learners outlines:
admission policy; description of
programmes; grading policies; graduation
and promotion requirements; technology
requirements; statement of all fees and
tuition; refund policy; and contact
information including hours of operation
and holiday schedules.
8.1.3 Misleading or inaccurate information
released on the institutions registration
status, accreditation of programmes, or
actions taken by the University Council of
Jamaica (UCJ), is publicly corrected.
8.1.4 Programmes are approved by the UCJ prior
to advertisements or enrolling learners.
8.1.5 Reliable, current, and accurate information
on the institution’s performance and learner
achievement is provided at all times.
Website, social media
presence, brochure,
advertisements in
media.
Press release,
advertisements,
website, social media
presence, reports,
registration and
accreditation
certificates.
Brochures,
advertisements,
handbooks, programme
documents.
Graduation policy.
8.2 The institution states its
registration and accreditation
status in its brochure and on its
online presence.
8.2.1 Registration and accreditation status are
clearly stated in promotional materials.
8.2.2 The UCJ’s name, address, and telephone
number is noted in the institution’s
brochures, along with linkage to the UCJ’s
website.
Brochures, handbooks,
advertisements,
website, social media
presence.
Registration/
accreditation
certificate.
22
Criterion 8: Advertising and Promotion
Criteria Standards Indicators Evidence
8.2.3 Registration/Accreditation certificate from
the UCJ is publicly displayed.
8.2.4 The UCJ’s website is noted in all
promotional materials.
8.3 The institution has clear and
accurate statements on its
registration and accreditation
status with the UCJ.
8.3.1 Registered institutions are identified as
“Registered by the University Council of
Jamaica (UCJ).”
8.3.2 Programmes accredited by the UCJ are
identified as “Accredited by the University
Council of Jamaica (UCJ).”
8.3.3 In the case of institutional accreditation,
programmes are referred to as being,
“Recognized by the University Council of
Jamaica (UCJ)”.
8.3.4 Promotional materials show a clear
separation of programmes that are
accredited and those that are not accredited.
8.3.5 Visitors to the institution’s website, or any
other online presence, promoting the
institution’s programmes, can hyperlink to
the UCJ’s website, which contains a list of
registered/accredited programmes.
Prospectus, Certificate
of Accreditation,
Certificate of
Registration, social
media presence,
website, handbooks,
programme documents,
guideline document.
8.4 The institution has approval
from the UCJ to use the terms
“University” or “University
College” in its name.
8.4.1 The UCJ’s guidelines for use of the terms
“University” or “University College” are
observed.
Registration certificate.
8.5 The institution has approval
from the UCJ for use of its
logo.
8.5.1 The institution adheres to the UCJ’s
guidelines for use of its name and logo
Promotional materials.
23
Criterion 9 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Scope The institution collects data on learners; their needs and learning and achievement,
for use in the review of programmes and courses; and the provision of support
services. A well formulated plan guides the management and operations of the
institution, with emphasis on satisfying the needs of stakeholders and meeting high
standards of quality.
Criterion 9: Research and Development
Criteria Standards Indicators Source of Evidence
9.1 The institution encourages,
promotes, and facilitates
research among staff and
learners.
9.1.1 Standards for research are communicated to
learners and staff.
9.1.2 Procedures and guidelines for the conduct of
research are documented and communicated
to learners and staff.
9.1.3 Research and publication are criteria for
tenure and are used for promotion of faculty.
9.1.4 Incentives are provided for the conduct and
publication of research.
9.1.5 Guidelines are available for the quality and
quantity of publications required.
9.1.6 Research is done as part of the institution’s
community outreach and partnership with
external stakeholders.
Research committee
handbook/guidelines
for research.
Annual reports of
research output
(submitted by staff).
9.2 The institution uses data from
research to make informed
decisions about programmes
and course development.
9.2.1 Surveys of employers, public and private
sector bodies and other stakeholders are
regularly undertaken to inform programme
and course development.
9.2.2 Technology Research Committee (or similar
entity) provides technical assistance to the
administration faculty, staff and students.
9.2.3 Technology options are carefully researched
and the information generated used to make
informed decisions about the value of
various technologies.
Survey reports are
available and their use
reported in curriculum
committee minutes.
Policy statements as
well as decisions taken
re technology in use
reflect the involvement
and recommendations
of the technology
research committee.
9.3 The institution has in place
procedures for the ethical
conduct of research.
9.3.1 Ethical practices in research relating to
plagiarism, copying, intellectual property
rights etc. are documented and
communicated.
Handbook/guidelines
for research.
24
Criterion 9: Research and Development
Criteria Standards Indicators Source of Evidence
9.4 The institution collects and
maintains information and
data from formal and
informal sources, to inform
policy and strategies relating
to the teaching and learning
environment.
9.4.1 A learner data base is maintained and staff
members have access to and are able to
collect and analyse learner data to assist them
in planning and maintaining quality teaching
and learning.
9.4.2 Reviews and analyses of data on learner
profiles, needs and expectations, are
conducted.
9.4.3 Research data inform the review of courses
and programmes, course materials and
assessment.
9.4.4 Learners are encouraged to participate in the
formulation of policy in relation to learner
support.
9.4.5 Mechanisms exist for learners to provide
feedback which is used for programme
improvement.
Student data base exists
and can be scrutinised.
Protocols regarding
access are developed
and documented.
Minutes of relevant
meetings (at the
unit/department/school/
faculty and
organisational (e.g.
university) level
indicate use of the
available data in
planning, curriculum
review and assessment).
Learners are
represented on policy
and decision making
bodies.
Learners complete
evaluation forms which
are used in programme
and course review.
9.5 The institution engages in
consultancy services for the
community, industry and
other stakeholders.
9.5.1 A Consultancy Committee sets guidelines for
the involvement of staff in consultancy, and
monitors this involvement.
Minutes of the
Consultancy Committee
meeting (reflecting
appropriate practices).
Reports (examples of
research in the
community).
9.6 The institution conducts
research to measure, and
advise on recommendations
for improvements in:
a. Efficiency of operations
and services
b. Achievement of stated
goals and objectives.
9.6.1 Systems are in place to conduct institutional
research geared towards producing data to
enhance the operations of the institution and
to ensure the attainment of objectives.
Reports of institutional
research, information
on how research is
used.
25
References
Commonwealth of Learning, (2009). Quality Assurance Toolkit: Distance Higher Education Institutions
and Programmes. Retrieved from
http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/HE_QA_Toolkit_web.pdf
Quality Assurance in Open and Distance Learning, ( 1999). Retrieved from
http://www.col.org/PublicationDocuments/pub_Quality_Assurance_05_web.pdf
DETC Accrediting Commission, (2013). Accreditation Handbook. Retrieved from
http://www.detc.org/accreditationhandbook/2013/2013_AC_Handbook(013113).pdf
26
APPENDIX
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Acceptable Use Policy (AUP): A set of rules by which users of a computer system, network, website, or
other information technology resource, have to abide. The AUP normally describes the ways in which a
computer or network may be used appropriately.
Accreditation: Status granted to an institution or programme that has been found, through self-study and
peer review, to meet or exceed stated guidelines of educational quality. Such status entitles institutions
and programmes to the confidence of the educational community and the public they serve. Accreditation
is a voluntary activity that promotes the improvement of educational quality through self-evaluation, self-
regulation and accountability.
Assessment (process): An ongoing, systematic process that sets clear expectations for learning in the
form of learning outcomes; provides sufficient opportunities for learners to achieve these expectations;
gathers evidence of learning; and uses this information to improve teaching and learning.
Assessment (strategies): A variety of instruments and methods used to evaluate learner performance in
the different courses. This feedback can be used to facilitate improvement in learner performance and
programme quality.
Asynchronous Communication: Communication that takes place at different times (or non-
simultaneously) with different participants.
Blended Learning: Incorporation of both face to face and distance learning in the delivery of a
course/programme of study.
Computer Network (or network): A group of (two or more) computers connected to each other
electronically.
Course: Units of learning activities that result in the award of a diploma, certificate, or academic credit
when completed.
Credit: Credit is a “currency” providing a measure of learning outcomes achieved in notional hours at a
given level. It is awarded for learning that has been achieved and verified through reliable and valid
assessment.
Credit Hour: A credit hour, otherwise known as a semester hour, a semester credit hour or a term credit
hour, is the term commonly used, as a measurement of class time at the college or university level.
One credit hour usually represents one hour of contact time each week for one semester. One credit hour
or one credit is therefore equal to a minimum of 15 hours of teaching or lecture time.
With regard to distance learning courses, credits are measured by the learning outcomes normally
achieved through a minimum of 45 hours of student work for one semester credit.
27
Student work is defined in terms of 15 hours of academic engagement and 30 hours of preparation.
Academic engagement may include, but is not limited to, submitting an academic assignment,
listening to class lectures or webinars (synchronous or asynchronous), taking an exam,
completing an interactive tutorial or computer-assisted instruction, attending a study group that is
assigned by the institution, contributing to an academic online discussion, initiating contact with
a faculty member to ask a question about the academic subject studied in the course, conducting
laboratory work, and completing an externship or internship.
Preparation is typically homework, such as reading and study time, and completing assignments and
projects. Therefore, a 3 credit hour course would require 135 semester hours (45 hours of academic
engagement and 90 hours of preparation).
Criteria: The rules, principles, or statements by which performance is evaluated or decisions made.
Curriculum: An overall plan of work or course of activities that includes the learning outcomes and
content, experiences, and assessments necessary to prepare learners in a specialized area at a specific
educational level.
Data: Factual information used as a basis for reasoning, discussion, or calculation.
Data Protection Policy: A document that reflects data protection rules and applies them to the systems of
the organization so that the organization may use the personal data of individuals appropriately.
Data Protection Rules: Ordinances to protect the privacy of individuals in relation to personal data and
to regulate the collection, processing, keeping, use and disclosure of certain information relating to
individuals.
Distance Education/Learning: A formal education process in which the learner may be separated from
the instructor in space and time. This may cover a range of courses from fully online to blended learning,
offered synchronously or asynchronously using various technologies from printed materials, to a range of
information and communication technologies (ICT).
Face-to-Face Instruction: Delivery of courses, lectures, and tutorials through the interaction of
instructors and learners located in the same physical space.
Faculty/Academic Staff: Individuals, who present instruction, prepare instructional material, evaluate
assignments, and counsel learners in academic selection and progress.
Formative Assessment: Ongoing assessment used to inform instruction. The frequency is not defined, so
it might be weekly or quarterly. Also the type of measure used is not defined, as long as the information is
helpful for the teacher in making adjustments to instruction in an ongoing manner. It could be as simple
as classroom observations, a fluency test, or a full diagnostic assessment.
Graduate: A person who has satisfied the prescribed requirements (e.g. assignments or examinations of
an educational course or programme) and has been awarded a certificate, diploma, or degree to confirm
this.
Indicator: A measure that determines if a standard has been achieved.
28
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT): The set of tools used to process and
communicate information.
Information System: An integrated set of components for collecting, storing, and processing data and for
delivering information, knowledge and digital products.
Institutional Effectiveness: A set of ongoing and systematically planned practices that include the
evaluation of programmes and services, the identification and measurement of outcomes across all
institutional units (educational, administrative and co-curricular), and the use of institutional research
results to inform decision-making. All of these activities take place with the purpose of improving
programmes, learner, learner success and institutional quality.
Institutional Objectives: These are realistic targets for the overall institution. Institutional objectives
present measurable outcomes, which are sometimes referred to as Core Values.
Institutional Research: The set of actions used to describe the educational, demographical,
administrative and co-curricular activities of an institution. These descriptive metrics can be both
quantitative and qualitative and are the data that drives the Institutional Effectiveness planning process.
Instructional Materials: Those specialized resources which make up a curriculum of study, such as
textbooks, workbooks, study guides, computer software, CD ROMS, kits, supplies, etc. used in the
instructional programme.
Intellectual Property Rights: Rights given to persons over the creations of their minds. They usually
give the creator an exclusive right over the use of his/her creation for a certain period of time. Types of
intellectual property include: Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights and Trade Secrets.
Internal Quality Assurance (IQA): A system for quality assurance which allows for constant
monitoring and evaluation of an institution’s operations and programmes in order to develop and improve
its educational and administrative capacities on an on-going basis. Such a system should support
institutional planning, promote improved quality, and work towards the creation of a culture of quality
assurance across the entire institution. Quality is first and foremost the responsibility of the institution.
IQA prepares the institution and/or its programmes for presentation to the External Quality Assurance
(EQA) body for external review.
Learning Management System (LMS): A software application (or web-based technology) used to plan,
implement and assess a specific learning process.
Learning Outcomes: Statements which specify what a learner should know, understand or be able to do
(including skills and attitudes) on the completion of a course or programme of study. Such statements
indicate the criteria against which achievement can be assessed. Outcomes are precise, tangible, concrete,
and measurable, repeated over time and can be validated.
Mission Statement: A formal short written statement of the overall purpose of the institution. It guides
the actions of the institution, spells out its overall goals, provides a sense of direction, and guides
decision-making. It provides a framework or context within which the institution’s strategies are
formulated.
Needs Assessment: A process for determining and addressing needs, or “gaps” between current
conditions and desired conditions, often used for improvement in individuals, education/training
29
organizations, or communities. An institution should do a “needs assessment” before developing a new
programme.
Online: Having a current connection to a computer network; sometimes used to describe a current
connection to the internet.
Online Presence: An institution’s or individual’s collective existence in cyberspace and takes many
forms such as websites, blogs, social media (Facebook, LinkedIn) and discussion boards, etc.
Quality Assurance: The attitudes, objects, actions, systems, policies and procedures internal or external
to the institution which, through their existence and use, and together with the quality control activities,
ensure that academic standards are being maintained and enhanced in programmes or institutions.
Programme: An integrated schedule of courses that are offered at each stage of a planned curriculum
aligned to the mission, goals and philosophy of the institution and leading to specific learning outcomes.
Social Media: A group of Internet-based applications that allow the creation and exchange of user-
generated content.
Software: Anything that can be stored electronically, that is, computer instructions or data.
Software Application (or application): Software that enables a computer to perform a given task
beyond the operation of the computer itself.
Standard: A rule, principle, or measure established by an authority. Anything used as a test of quality
whether formulated as a rule or principle - criteria for excellence.
Learner Satisfaction: Evidence presented by an institution that shows that the learners and graduates of
the institution have expressed their overall satisfaction with the courses and services as they have
experienced them.
Summative Assessment: Testing the knowledge that a student should have mastered by a particular point
in time and given at pre-determined intervals.
Synchronous Communication: Interaction between participants which is simultaneous (“real time”) and
the time delay between when communication is sent and received is negligible.
Technology Plan: A document which guides the strategic planning, decision-making and management of
all ICT elements of an organization.
Transcript: An official copy of a learner’s educational record at an educational institution; it usually lists
all courses taken, final grades received, and credits earned.
Web Page: A document (or page), each screen, that a user sees when he or she accesses the internet using
the World Wide Web.
Website: A set of interconnected web pages.
The University Council of Jamaica6b Oxford Road, Kingston 5,
Jamaica W.I.Tel: (876) 929-7299, 906-8012
Fax: (876) 929-7312E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.ucj.org.jm
Copyright © 2014 The University Council of Jamaica
ISBN 978-976-95144-6-1