sws survey review sws survey review_march... · the 2017 sws survey review 9 satisfaction with...

The 2017 SWS Survey Review

Copyright © 2017

Social Weather Stations

1

17 March 2017

PSSC Annual General Membership Meeting

PSSCenter, Diliman, Quezon City

The 2017

SWS Survey Review


The 2017 SWS Survey Review 2

This 2017 Survey Review is based on the four

quarterly Social Weather Surveys of 2016;

the Feb-May 2016 Survey of Enterprises,

supported by Australian Embassy-The Asia

Foundation Partnership in the Philippines,

United States Agency for International

Development through the Integrity for Investments

Initiative, in partnership with the National

Competitiveness Council;


Copyright © 2017


2


the SWS own-account pre-election surveys of December 2015, and January, February, March,

April and May 2016;

and the Bilang Pilipino TV5-SWS Exit Poll, done in partnership with TV5 Network Inc.

SWS gratefully acknowledges its research partners and its media partner BusinessWorld,

who believe in the importance of openly-disclosed social surveys in a democratic society.


Topics1. Public morale

2. Poverty and hunger

3. 2016 survey of businessmen on corruption

4. The 2016 election

5. The President

6. Satisfaction with other officials & institutions

7. The 2016 Report Card of the administration

8. Foreign affairs

9. Public safety

10. Government campaign against illegal drugs

11. The business climate


Copyright © 2017


3


1 Public morale:very high, since 2010


HAPPINESS: PHILIPPINES, 1991 - 2016

Note: Blank spaces are Don’t Know and Refused responses.

Question. If you were to consider your life in general these days, how happy or unhappy would you say you are on the

whole? Are you..?

24

40

26 28

3830

35 33 3528

1926

37 3932 34 32 29

37 3442

3543

3036 37 39

3135

46

60

52

55 51

49

5350 51 46

51

5750

46 45

48 46 4748

4949

4248

43

50

4953 49

5654

45

13

7

15 16

1212

12 13 16 1819 18

14 1416 16 17 19

1214 13 13

1317

139 10 11 9 7

2 1 4 51

4 3 3 3 3 5 53 3

3 4 4 4 2 3 3 32 4 2 1 2 2 2 2

Jul91

Jun96

Nov98

Mar01

Jul01

Sep01

Nov01

Mar02

Jun03

Jun04

May05

Aug05

Sep06

Nov06

Dec07

Mar08

Sep08

Dec08

Sep10

Nov10

Jun11

Dec12

Dec13

Sep14

Dec14

Mar15

Sep15

Apr16

Jun16

Dec160

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

ARROYO B. AQUINO C. AQUINO ESTRADA

RAMOS

% o

f a

du

lts

Not at all happy

Not very happy

Fairly happy

Very happy

DUTERTE


Copyright © 2017


4


SATISFACTION WITH LIFE: PHILIPPINES, 2002 - 2016

Fairly satisfied

Very satisfied

Not very satisfied

Not at all satisfied

Note: Blank spaces are Don’t Know and Refused responsesQuestion. On the whole, are you very satisfied, fairly satisfied, not very satisfied or not at all satisfied with the life you lead? Would you say you are ..?

ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

2216 19

34

20 1927 28 25

15

2419

24

37

26

40 41

31 3339

27 27 2937

3341

3035

4741

4145

47

42

4642

42

4949

51

4447

44

48

51

4145

4548

43

49 4950

4852

47

5551

43

46

28 3226

19

2631

24

1920

24 2222

23

12

1815

10

1814 12

17 1617

12 13 1011 11

89

9 7 8 5 8 9 65

610 9 12 9

4 6 5 5 7 5 5 8 9 4 3 3 23 3 2 4

May02

Sep02

Nov02

Jun03

Sep03

Nov03

Feb04

Jun04

Aug04

May05

Aug05

Mar06

Dec08

Sep10

Nov10

Jun11

Dec11

Mar12

Dec12

Dec13

Mar14

Jun14

Sep14

Dec14

Mar15

Sep15

Apr16

Jun16

Sep16

Dec16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

% o

f a

du

lts


C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

Q. On the whole, are you ... (VERY SATISFIED, FAIRLY SATISFIED, NOT VERY SATISFIED, NOT AT ALL SATISFIED) with the way democracy works in the Philippines?

Q. Which of the following statements comes closest to your own opinion? (SHOWCARD) [Democracy is always preferable to any other kind of government; Under some circumstances, an authoritarian government can be preferable to a democratic one; For people like me, it does not matter whether we have a democratic or a non-democratic regime]

86% satisfied with how democracy works

SATISFACTION WITH HOW DEMOCRACY WORKS,

NOV 1991 TO SEP 2016

% o

f ad

ult

s

1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

10

30

50

70


Copyright © 2017


5



Q. On the whole, are you ... (VERY SATISFIED, FAIRLY SATISFIED, NOT VERY SATISFIED, NOT AT ALL SATISFIED) with the way democracy works in the Philippines?

Q. Which of the following statements comes closest to your own opinion? (SHOWCARD) [Democracy is always preferable to any other kind of government; Under some circumstances, an authoritarian government can be preferable to a democratic one; For people like me, it does not matter whether we have a democratic or a non-democratic regime]

62% always prefer Democracy

19% sometimes prefer Authoritarianism

PREFERENCE FOR DEMOCRACY, NOV 1991 TO SEP 2016%

of

ad

ult

s

1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

10

30

50

70


EXPECTED CHANGE IN QUALITY OF LIFE IN NEXT 12 MONTHS,

APR 1984 TO DEC 2016VMMARCOS C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO III DUTERTE

Question. Sa inyong opinyon, ano ang magiging uri ng inyong pamumuhay sa darating na 12 buwan?

Masasabi ba ninyo na ang uri ng inyong pamumuhay ay [BUBUTI; KAPAREHO LANG; SASAMA; HINDI ALAM]?

Optimists : “Bubuti” Pessimists: “Sasama”

48%

3%

OPTIMISTS

PESSIMISTS

1984 1986 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

10

30

50

70

% of adults


Copyright © 2017


6


1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

10

30

50

70ESTRADA ARROYO AQUINO DUTERTE

EXPECTED CHANGE IN THE PHILIPPINE ECONOMY,

SEP 1998 TO DEC 2016

Question. Sa darating na 12 buwan, ano sa palagay ninyo ang mangyayari sa ekonomiya ng Pilipinas?

Masasabi ba ninyo na ito ay... [BUBUTI; KAPAREHO LANG; SASAMA; HINDI ALAM]?

8% it will

deteriorate

51% it will

improve

% of adults


10

30

50

70

MARCOS C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

Kung ikukumpara ang uri ng inyong kasalukuyang pamumuhay sa nakaraang 12 buwan, masasabi ba ninyo na

ang uri ng inyong pamumuhay ay [MAS MABUTI NGAYON KAYSA NOON, KAPAREHO NG DATI, MAS MASAMA

NGAYON KAYSA NOON]

Gainers : “Mas mabuti ngayon kaysa noon” Losers: “Mas masama ngayon kaysa noon”

CHANGE IN QUALITY OF LIFE OVER PAST 12 MONTHS,

APR 1983 TO DEC 2016

37%

21%

GAINERS

LOSERS

GAINERS

LOSERS

2001 2004 2010 20161983 1986 1992 1998

% of adults


Copyright © 2017


7


2 Poverty and Hunger:declining since 2014


% o

f fa

milie

s

SELF-RATED POVERTY: FAMILIES WHO ARE “MAHIRAP”,

PHILIPPINES, APR 1983 TO DEC 2016

Self-Rated Poverty Question: Where would you place your family in this card? (Not poor, On the line, Poor)

*Note: The NSCB figures, which compare income of the year to the official poverty line, are plotted in June of the year.


44%

18.8% 20.0%

22.3% 21.1%

1983 1986 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

10

30

50

70

“Unrefined” pre-2011

“Refined” in 2011

“Refined” w/o Leyte and Batanes

PSA-NSCB:

POVERTY.PRS


Copyright © 2017


8


% o

f fa

milie

sANNUAL AVERAGE OF FAMILIES WHO ARE “MAHIRAP”:

PHILIPPINES, 1983 TO 2016

Self-Rated Poverty Question: Where would you place your family in this card? (Not poor, On the line, Poor)

*Note: The NSCB figures, which compare income of the year to the official poverty line, are plotted in June of the year.

55

74

67

47

66

62

68 67 66 6568

63

59 5961 61

57

62 6360

5153 54

5053

49 48 4952 52

54

50

44

'85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15

10

30

50

70


5

10

15

20

Note: Don’t Know and Refused responses are not shown. Q: Nitong nakaraang 3 buwan, nangyari po ba kahit minsan na ang inyong pamilya ay nakaranas ng gutom at wala kayong makain? KUNG OO: Nangyari po ba ‘yan ng MINSAN LAMANG, MGA ILANG BESES, MADALAS, o PALAGI?

DEGREE OF HUNGER IN HOUSEHOLDS,

PHILIPPINES: JUL 1998 TO DEC 2016

13.9%

10.9%

3.0%

% o

f h

ou

se

ho

lds

ESTRADA ARROYO AQUINO DUTERTE

1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

Total Hunger

Severe

Moderate


Copyright © 2017


9


Note: Don’t Know and Refused responses are not shown. Q: Nitong nakaraang 3 buwan, nangyari po ba kahit minsan na ang inyong pamilya ay nakaranas ng gutom at wala kayong makain? KUNG OO: Nangyari po ba ‘yan ng MINSAN LAMANG, MGA ILANG BESES, MADALAS, o PALAGI?

ANNUAL AVERAGE OF HUNGER IN HOUSEHOLDS,

PHILIPPINES: 1998 TO 2016

% o

f h

ou

se

ho

lds

7.0

5.86.2 7.3

7.6

5.5

8.711.0

12.614.4 14.6 15.1 15.8 16.1 15.6 15.9

14.8

11.2 11.2

4.12.6

4.6 4.22.5 1.5

3.0 34 3.4 4 4 3.3 3.7 4.3 3.6 3.5

2.2 2.1

'98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16

5

10

15

20

11.0

8.3

10.811.4

10.1

7.0

11.8

14.3

16.717.9

18.519.1 19.1

19.9 19.919.5

18.3

13.4 13.3


SWS JOBLESSNESS RATE* AND NSO UNEMPLOYMENT RATE,

PHILIPPINES, DEC 1993 TO DEC 2016

RAMOS

25.1%

6.6% (as of Jan 2017)

ESTRADA ARROYO AQUINO

* % without a job at present and looking for a job.

Source: Social Weather Surveys and NSO.

% o

f ad

ult

s i

n lab

or

forc

e

1993 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

5

15

25

35

PSA unemployment (new definition)

SWS joblessness: 18 yrs+

PSA unemployment (15 yrs+ )


Copyright © 2017


10


3 Surveys of businessmen

about corruption:less under Pnoy than under

PGMA (latest, Feb-May 2016)


EXTENT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR,

2000 - 2016

A lot

Some

A littleNone

Q50. How much corruption do you think there is in the PUBLIC SECTOR?

ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO


Copyright © 2017


11


LAST TIME WITH PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF PUBLIC

SECTOR CORRUPTION IN OWN SECTOR OF BUSINESS,

2005 - 2016

Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector/Government

Q53. When was the last time you had personal knowledge of a corrupt transaction with government by a company in

your sector of business?

Last month

2-3 mos. ago

4-6 mos. ago

7-12 mos. ago

>1 yr ago

ARROYO B. AQUINO


NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN OWN LINE

OF BUSINESS THAT GIVE BRIBES TO WIN

PUBLIC SECTOR CONTRACTS, 2000 - 2016

Base: Total Who Say Companies in Their Sector Allot a Percentage for Bribes to Win Public Sector Contracts

Almost all

Most

Few

Hardly any

None

Q54. In your line of business, how many companies do you think give bribes to win public sector contracts?



Copyright © 2017


12


VERY GOOD NET SINCERITY RATINGS IN FIGHTING

CORRUPTION, 2005 TO 2016

+55

+63

+55

'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '12 '13 '15 '16

Securities and Exchange

Commission

+70

+50

+30

+10

0

-10

-30

GMA BSA


GOOD NET SINCERITY RATINGS IN FIGHTING CORRUPTION,

2005 TO 2016

+10

+40

-15

+26

+54

-3

+32

+42

-27

+30

+38

-37

+37

+59

+80

+61+58

+43

+77

+53+51+54

+28

+43+38 +37 +37

'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '12 '13 '15 '16

1/2

Office of

the

President

Dept. of Trade

and IndustryDept. of Labor

and

Employment

Dept. of Health

+70

+50

+30

+10

0

-10

-30

GMA BSAGMA BSA

GMA BSA


Copyright © 2017


13


GOOD NET SINCERITY RATINGS IN FIGHTING CORRUPTION,

2005 TO 2016

+11

+48

+22

+3

+38 +40

+5+10

+52

+45

+9+7

+46

+37

+40

+40 +40

-8

+51

+24

+39

+49+52

+36

+23

+41 +43

+57

+42+36+35 +32 +30 +30 +30

'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '12 '13 '15 '16

2/2

Civil Service

Commission

Dept. of

Education

Social Security

System

Supreme

Court Office of the

Ombudsman

+70

+50

+30

+10

0

-10

-30

GMA BSA GMA BSA GMA BSA GMA BSA


MODERATE NET SINCERITY RATINGS IN FIGHTING


+5

+19+13

+5

+13

+5

-20

+20+14 +13

-19

+23

+5

-12-17

+8 +8

-5 -5

+27+22

+52

+15

+35+36

+24

+37

+27

+34+29 +26

+21 +21 +20

'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '12 '13 '15 '16

1/2

Commission on

AuditDept. of Social

Welfare and

Development

Sandiganbayan

+70

+50

+30

+10

0

-10

-30


Gov’t Service

Insurance

SystemDept. of

Justice


Copyright © 2017


14


MODERATE NET SINCERITY RATINGS IN FIGHTING


+31+27

-38

+22

-59

-19

+26

-36

-9

+35

-27

+6

+35

-8

+10

+21

-13

+23

+7

+19

+12

-6

+4

+18+14 +12 +10

'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '12 '13 '15 '16

2/2

Barangay government City/Municipal

government

+30

+10

0

-10

-30

-50

-70

GMA BSA GMA BSA GMA BSA

Commission

on Elections

GMA BSA

Armed

Forces of

the

Philippines


NEUTRAL NET SINCERITY RATINGS IN FIGHTING


+5 +3

-13

+5

-19

+10+15

-32

-5-4

-28

+11 +9+15

+12+15

+6+9 +9 +8 +6

'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '12 '13 '15 '16

+70

+50

+30

+10

0

-10

-30

1/2


Dept. of Finance Presidential

Commission

on Good

Government

Trial CourtsGovernance

Commission for

GOCCs


Copyright © 2017


15


NEUTRAL NET SINCERITY RATINGS IN FIGHTING


-44

-17

-39

-17

-32

-24-23

-7

-18

-8

-25

-6

-23

-17

-34

-1

-25

-19

+1

+36

+30

-4-8

+20

+6

-2

+9

-10-3 -3

-7 -9

'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '12 '13 '15 '16

2/2

Dept. of

Environment and

Natural Resources

Dept. of Interior and

Local Government Dept. of

Agriculture

Senate

+30

+10

0

-10

-30

-70

-50



POOR NET SINCERITY RATINGS IN FIGHTING CORRUPTION,

2005 TO 2016

+24

-42

-66

0

-36

-66

+5

-23

-55

-7

-18

-63

-17 -17

-65

+23

-12

-21

+9

-24 -22

-7

-16-21

-10 -13

-22

'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '12 '13 '15 '16

Dept. of Budget and

Management

Philippine National

Police

+30

+10

0

-10

-30

-70

-50

1/2


Dept. of Public Works and

Highways


Copyright © 2017


16


POOR NET SINCERITY RATINGS IN FIGHTING CORRUPTION,

2005 TO 2016

-59

-28

-22

-58

-40

-13

-49

-32-27

-56

-41

-30

-57

-34

+10

-20

-6

+8

-10

-28

-2 -4

-25-25 -27 -28

'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '12 '13 '15 '16

2/2

+30

+10

0

-10

-30

-70

-50


Dept. of

Transportation and

Communications

House of

Representatives

Bureau of Internal

Revenue


BAD AND VERY BAD NET SINCERITY RATINGS IN FIGHTING


-45

-75

-38

-74

-31

-68

-32

-72

-39

-69

-26

-46

-32

-63

-26

-55-47

-68

'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '12 '13 '15 '16

+30

+10

0

-10

-30

-70

-50

BAD VERY BAD

GMA BSA

Land Transportation

Office

GMA BSA

Bureau of Customs


Copyright © 2017


17


ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR ANY OF SEVEN LISTED

BRIBES, 2005 – 2016

Q77-83. In which of the following transactions has your company been asked for a bribe by anyone in government

during 2015?

ARROYO B. AQUINO


NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN THE SAME LINE OF BUSINESS

THAT GIVE BRIBES TO WIN PRIVATE SECTOR CONTRACTS,

2000 - 2016

Base: Total Who Say There is Corruption in the Private Sector

Almost all

Most

Few

Hardly any

None

Q62. In your sector of business, how many companies do you think give bribes to win private business sector

contracts?



Copyright © 2017


18


“TO PROSPER IN BUSINESS IN THE PHILIPPINES TODAY,

ONE HAS TO BE CORRUPT,” 2006 - 2016

Q8. Do you agree or disagree with this statement: “To prosper in business in the Philippines today, one has to be corrupt”?

Agree

Undecided

Disagree

ARROYO B. AQUINO


4 The 2016 election: clear win for Duterte; VP

race uncallable ; the

debates mattered


Copyright © 2017


19


1/10 1/17 1/24 1/31 2/7 2/14 2/21 2/28 3/6 3/13 3/20 3/27 4/3 4/10 4/17 4/24 5/1

10%

20%

30%

40%

VOTER PREFERENCES FOR PRESIDENT, PHILIPPINES,

SWS FACE-TO-FACE SURVEYS, JAN 8-10 TO MAY 1-3, 2016

Jan 8-10(8N)[VV]

[n=1,200]

Feb 5-7(7N)[VV]

[n=1,200]

Mar 4-7(6N)[VV]

[n=1,800]

Mar 30-Apr 2(6N)[VV]

[n=1,500]

Apr 18-20(6N)[VV]

[n=1,800]

Invalid marks (6%)

Poe (22%)

Roxas (20%)

Duterte (33%)

Santiago (2%)Und ++ (4%)

Binay (13%)

Note: Respondents: VV = Validated Voters; Lists: #N = Number of names in the list. Figures in

brackets are sample sizes. Votes for Roy Seneres (0.08%) are not shown.

May 1-3(6N)[VV]

[n=4,500]


1/10 1/17 1/24 1/31 2/7 2/14 2/21 2/28 3/6 3/13 3/20 3/27 4/3 4/10 4/17 4/24 5/1

10%

20%

30%

40%

VOTER PREFERENCES FOR VICE-PRESIDENT, PHILIPPINES,

SWS FACE-TO-FACE SURVEYS, JAN 8-10 TO MAY 1-3, 2016

Invalid marks (4%)

Escudero (15%)

Robredo (28%)Marcos (29%)

Cayetano (13%)

Honasan (3%)Trillanes (3%)

Und ++ (5%)

Jan 8-10(19N)[VV]

[n=1,200]

Feb 5-7(6N)[VV]

[n=1,200]

Mar 4-7(6N)[VV]

[n=1,800]

Mar 30-Apr 2(6N)[VV]

[n=1,500]

Apr 18-20(6N)[VV]

[n=1,800]

Note: Respondents: VV = Validated Voters; Lists: #N = Number of names in the list. Figures in

brackets are sample sizes.

May 1-3(6N)[VV]

[n=4,500]


Copyright © 2017


20


Comparison of the COMELEC FINAL OFFICIAL TALLY

(Final canvass report, 20 May 2016) and TV5-SWS Exit Poll:

FOR PRESIDENT

Average Absolute Difference: 0.90

38.99

23.43

21.37

12.72

3.42

0.06

40.07

23.04

18.96

13.94

3.14

0.08

10 20 30 40

Duterte, Rody

Roxas, Mar "Daang Matuwid"

Poe, Grace

Binay, Jojo

Defensor Santiago, Miriam

Señeres, Roy

COMELEC

TV5-SWS

* SWS Exit Poll 2016 data as of May 11, 2016. Sample of 71,380 voters from 802 out of 802 sampled voting centers. Excludes Can't Answer/Refused (0.76%).


Comparison of the COMELEC FINAL OFFICIAL TALLY

(Final canvass report, 20 May 2016) and TV5-SWS Exit Poll:

FOR VICE-PRESIDENT*

Average Absolute Difference: 0.91

* SWS Exit Poll 2016 data as of 5:00 pm, May 9, 2016, broadcast on 6:15 pm. Sample of 18,116 voters from 501 out of 802 sampled voting centers. Excludes Can't Answer/Refused (2.32%).

35.11

34.47

14.38

12.01

2.11

1.92

32.5

34.9

15.3

10.7

2.1

2.2

Robredo, Leni “Daang Matuwid”

Marcos, Bongbong

Cayetano, Alan Peter

Escudero, Chiz

Honasan, Gringo

Trillanes, Antonio IV

10 20 30 40

COMELEC

TV5-SWS


Copyright © 2017


21


RANKS OF SENATORS: TV5-SWS 2016 EXIT POLL VS. FINAL

OFFICIAL COMELEC TALLY, PHILIPPINES

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Pearson rank-

order correlation

r = 0.978**

12 OUT OF 12

WINNERS


IS PLATFORM OR PERSONALITY THE MAIN REASON FOR YOUR

CHOICE OF CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT?Final sample of 72, 821 voters, 10:00 p.m., May 18, 2016

Question: PLATAPORMA po ba o PAGKATAO ang inyong pangunahing dahilan sa pagpili ng kandidato

sa pagka-Presidente? [Is PLATFORM or PERSONALITY the main reason for your choice of candidate

for President?]

Personality

Platform

Can’t say/Refused

57.3

40.4

2.3

10 20 30 40 50 60


Copyright © 2017


22


WHEN DID YOU DECIDE ON YOUR VOTE FOR PRESIDENT? Final sample of 72, 821 voters, 10:00 p.m., May 18, 2016

Question: Kailan po kayo nakapagdesisyon sa inyong boto sa pagka-Presidente? [When did you decide on your vote for president?]

Only now

In March

Can’t say/Refused

May 1-9

In April

In February or earlier

18.4

14.8

12.2

8.1

45.8

0.7

10 20 30 40 50


DID THE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES HELP YOU

IN CHOOSING YOUR PRESIDENT? Final sample of 72, 821 voters, 10:00 p.m., May 18, 2016

Question: Ang mga debate po ba ng kandidato sa Presidente ay nakatulong o hindi nakatulong sa inyong pagpili ng PRESIDENTE o hindi po kayo nakapanood ng alinmang debate? [Did the Presidential debates help you in choosing your PRESIDENT or were you not able to watch any debate?]

Can't answer/refused

Have not watched

No

Yes

1.2

72.7

11.8

14.3


Copyright © 2017


23


DID THE VICE-PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES HELP YOU

IN CHOOSING YOUR VICE-PRESIDENT? Final sample of 72, 821 voters, 10:00 p.m., May 18, 2016

Question: Ang mga debate po ba ng kandidato sa Bise-Presidente ay nakatulong o hindi nakatulong sa inyong pagpili ng BISE-PRESIDENTE o hindi po kayo nakapanood ng alinmang debate? [Did the Vice-Presidential debates help you in choosing your VICE-PRESIDENT or were you not able to watch any debate?]

1.2

68.7

12.2

17.9

Can't answer/refused

Have not watched

No

Yes


5 The President:a normal honeymoon so far


Copyright © 2017


24


PRRD AND PNOY: DIFFERING RACES, SIMILAR OUTCOMES

10%

20%

30%

40%Aquino III (43%)

Villar (15%)

Estrada (26%)

Teodoro (10%)

Gordon (1%)

Villanueva (3%)

Poe (19%)Roxas (23%)

Duterte (40%)

Santiago (3%)

Und ++ (4%)

Binay (14%)

10%

20%

30%

40%

Invalid marks (6%)

Nov

4-8

Dec

5-10

Dec

27-28

Jan

21-24

Feb

24-28

Mar

19-22

Apr

16-19

Mar

28-30

May

2-3

May

11

Sept

2-5

Nov

26-28

Dec

12-14

Jan

8-10

Feb

5-7

Mar

4-7

Apr

18-20

Mar 30-

Apr 2

May

1-3

May

18

THE 2010 ELECTION RACE

THE 2016 ELECTION RACE


HOW MANY OF HIS PROMISES WILL THE PRESIDENT KEEP?

PHILIPPINES, SEP 2010 AND JUN 2016

Q. Sa inyong palagay, ilan sa mga pangako ni [Pang. Noynoy Aquino/Pang. Rody Duterte] ang posibleng

matutupad? (SHOWCARD) [LAHAT O HALOS LAHAT SA MGA PANGAKO, KARAMIHAN SA MGA PANGAKO,

MGA ILAN SA MGA PANGAKO, HALOS WALA O WALA SA MGA PANGAKO]

All/nearly all

Most of them

A few of them

Almost none/none

% o

f ad

ult

s

PRES. NOYNOY AQUINO PRES. RODY DUTERTESep 2010 Jun 2016

9

35

50

4

22

41

32

1

10

30

50

70

90


Copyright © 2017


25


+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

-50

SWS TERMS FOR SATISFACTION OR TRUST

POOR

VERY BAD

BAD

NEUTRAL

MODERATE

GOOD

VERY GOOD

EXCELLENTNET RATING



NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF PRESIDENTS,

PHILIPPINES, MAY 1986 TO DEC 2016

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Dont Know and Refused to Answer responses.

Question. Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in the performance of [NAME] as President of the Philippines.

Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied?

1986 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

-50


Copyright © 2017


26


“Pres. Rodrigo Duterte’s habit of publicly cursing foreign or international officials whom he does not like is harmful to the

relations of the Philippines with the countries or institutions of those officials,” PH, DEC 2016

*% Agree minus % Disagree correctly rounded. Ignores Dont Know and Refused to Answer responses.

Q19. Gaano po kayo sumasang-ayon o hindi sumasang-ayon sa pangungusap na ito: “Ang nakagawiang pagmumura sa

publiko ni Pang. Rodrigo Duterte ng mga banyagang opisyal na hindi niya gusto ay nakakasama sa relasyon ng Pilipinas

sa ibang bansa o institusyon ng mga opisyal na ito.”

Strongly

disagree

Somewhat

disagree

UNDECIDED

Somewhat

agree

Strongly

agree18

15

17 24

27

AGREE

51%

DISAGREE

33%

% o

f ad

ult

s


NET* TRUST RATINGS OF PRESIDENTS,

PHILIPPINES, SEP 1989 TO DEC 2016

AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

* NET trust = % Much trust minus Little trust correctly rounded. Don’t Know and Refused responses are not shown.

Q. MAAARI PO BANG SABIHIN NINYO KUNG ANG PAGTITIWALA NINYO KAY (PERSONALITY) AY NAPAKALAKI, MEDYO MALAKI, HINDI TIYAK KUNG MALAKI O MALIIT, MEDYO MALIIT, NAPAKALIIT, O WALA PA KAYONG NARINIG O NABASA KAHIT NA KAILAN TUNGKOL KAY (PERSONALITY)?

1989 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

+10

+30

+50

+70

+90

-10

-30

-50

-70

Arroyo

EstradaC. Aquino

B. Aquino Duterte

Ramos


Copyright © 2017


27


6 Satisfaction with other

officials and institutions:VP, SP, Spkr, CJ – fair;

Senate, Hrep, SC, Cabinet –

more similar to Pnoy time


1986 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

10

+30

+50

+70

+90

-10

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF VICE-PRESIDENTS,

PHILIPPINES, OCT 1986 TO DEC 2016


+37Estrada

Arroyo

Guingona

De CastroBinay

Laurel

Robredo


Copyright © 2017


28


NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SENATE PRESIDENTS,

PHILIPPINES, APR 1990 TO DEC 2016

+30



Drilon

SalongaGonzales

Angara

GonzalesGonzales

Maceda Drilon

Ople

N. Pimentel

Drilon

Villar

Enrile

Fernan

Pimentel

1990 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10


NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF

REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES, FEB 1990 TO DEC 2016

+10



Nograles

Mitra

De Venecia Villar

Fuentebella

BelmonteDe Venecia Alvarez

1990 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10


Copyright © 2017


29



** As Acting Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines.

+16


NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF CHIEF JUSTICES OF THE

SUPREME COURT, PHILIPPINES, OCT 1986 TO DEC 2016

Carpio**

SerenoPanganiban

Teehankee

Fernan Narvasa Davide

Puno

Corona

1986 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

-50


NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF

REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES, SEP 1988 TO DEC 2016

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys).

+48

+36


Senate

House of Rep.

1988 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10


Copyright © 2017


30


* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.

NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SUPREME COURT

AND THE CABINET AS A WHOLE, NOV 1990 TO DEC 2016

SupremeCourt

+38

+32Cabinet


1990 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10


7 Report Cards of the

national administration:PNoy time the best of the past 5

admins; PRRD time following suit


Copyright © 2017


31


Adminis-

tration

Performance issue

Overall

Performance

Fighting

Inflation

Eradicating

Graft &

Corruption

Helping

The Poor

Foreign

Relations

Fighting

Crime

1 Cory

Aquino

+5 (a)

Neutral

-23 (b)

Poor

-8 (c)

Neutral

(d) (d) -11 (e)

Poor

2 Ramos +14

Moderate

-32

Bad

-19

Poor

+13

Moderate

+23

Moderate

-7

Neutral

3 Estrada +15

Moderate

-24

Poor

-7

Neutral

+32

Good

+28

Moderate

+4

Neutral

4 Arroyo -2

Neutral

-24

Poor

-23

Poor

+9

Neutral

+21

Moderate

-3

Neutral

5 Noynoy

Aquino

+47

Good

+2

Neutral

+15

Moderate

+46

Good

+43

Good

+20

Moderate

Notes: (a) started 1989; (b) started 1991; (c) started 1987; (d) no surveys;

(e) started 1990.

AVERAGE SATISFACTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE

OF 5 NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIONS, 1986-2010

3



NET* SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE

OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, FEB 1989 – DEC 2016


+61

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

-50

Net*

Satisfaction

1986 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016


Copyright © 2017


32


Campaign against illegal drugs +76 +77

Helping the poor +35 +51 +63 +66

Promoting the welfare of OFWs +62

Promoting Human Rights +31 * +63 +56

Defending the country's territorial rights +28 +45 +53 +54

Developing Science and Technology +54

Distributing lands to deserving tillers

under land reform +53

Providing jobs +23 +40 +46 +51

Fighting crimes +4 +31 +58 +50

Developing Science and Technology +54 +49 +50

Apr16 Jun16 Sep16 Dec16

ISSUES WITH EXCELLENT AND VERY GOOD GRADES IN REPORT

CARDS OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN 2016

Very Good (9)

Excel-lent(1)


Ensuring an efficient transportation system +39 +48

Foreign relations +36 +48 +39 +46

Eradicating graft and corruption +2 +27 +57 +45

Restoring peace to Mindanao +16 +43

Fighting terrorism +7 +55 +41

Solving the problem of extra judicial killings +40

Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry +3 +25 +37 +34

Reconciliation with Muslim rebels +4 +25 +42 +33

Reconciliation with communist rebels -2 +25 +39 +30


ISSUES WITH GOOD GRADES IN REPORT CARDS OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN 2016

Good (9)


Copyright © 2017


33


Protecting consumer rights +29

Planning programs of government +27

Fighting inflation -3 +19 +33 +25

Recovering the “hidden wealth” stolen by

Marcos and his cronies +24

Rehabilitation of areas damaged by

conflict with Muslim rebels in Mindanao +4


ISSUES WITH MODERATE AND NEUTRAL GRADES IN REPORT

CARDS OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN 2016

Mode-rate(4)

Neut-ral(1)


+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON HELPING THE POOR, DEC 1993 – DEC 2016


+66Net*

SatisfactionVG

1993 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016


Copyright © 2017


34


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

C.AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE


ON PROMOTING HUMAN RIGHTS, MAR 1987 – DEC 2016


+56

VG

Net*

Satisfaction

1987 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30



ON FIGHTING CRIMES, NOV 1990 – DEC 2016


+50

VG

Net*

Satisfaction

1990 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016


Copyright © 2017


35



ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, SEP 1992 – DEC 2016

+46



G

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

Net*

Satisfaction


+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30



NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL

ADMINISTRATION ON ERADICATING GRAFT AND

CORRUPTION, MAR 1987 – DEC 2016

+45

G

1987 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

Net*

Satisfaction


Copyright © 2017


36


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30



ON FIGHTING TERRORISM, NOV 2002 – DEC 2016


+41

Net*

Satisfaction

2004 2010 2016

G


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30



ADMINISTRATION ON ENSURING THAT NO FAMILY

WILL BE HUNGRY, DEC 2004 – DEC 2016

+34


G

2004 2010 2016


Copyright © 2017


37


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE


ADMINISTRATION ON RECONCILIATION WITH

MUSLIM REBELS, SEP 1998 – DEC 2016


+33

G

1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

Net*

Satisfaction


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE


ON RECONCILIATION WITH COMMUNIST REBELS,

SEP 1998 – DEC 2016

+30


G

Net*

Satisfaction

1998 2001 2004 2010 2016


Copyright © 2017


38


+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

-50



ON FIGHTING INFLATION, NOV 1991 – DEC 2016


+25

M

1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

Net*

Satisfaction



NET* SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA, FEB 1989 – DEC 2016


NCR: +53BAL LUZ: +56VIS: +58

MIN: +78

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

-50

1986 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

Net*

Satisfaction


Copyright © 2017


39


8 Foreign affairs:Support for the WPS case against

China; still much trust in the US,

trust in China and Russia turn

positive neutral


“DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH OUR GOVERNMENT’S

FILING OF A CASE AGAINST CHINA IN AN INTERNATIONAL

COURT IN ORDER TO RESOLVE THE DISPUTE ABOUT THE WEST

PHILIPPINE SEA?” MAR 2016

INTRO STATEMENT: Ang Pilipinas ay nagpasyang dalhin ang isyu sa isang independiyente at internasyunal na hukuman, ang United Nations Permanent Court Of

Arbitration (Arbitral Tribunal), para sa mapayapang resolusyon ng pagtatalo sa pagitan ng Pilipinas at Tsina ukol sa West Philippine Sea nang naaayon sa batas

internasyunal. Tutol naman ang Tsina sa ginawa na ito ng Pilipinas.

Q202. Kayo po ba ay sang-ayon o hindi sang-ayon sa pagsasampa ng ating pamahalaan ng kaso laban sa Tsina sa isang independiyente at internasyunal na

hukuman upang maresolba ang pagtatalo tungkol sa West Philippine Sea?

Strongly agree Somewhat agree NeitherSomewhat disagree

Strongly disagree


Copyright © 2017


40


“HOW CONFIDENT ARE YOU THAT THE PHILIPPINES WILL WIN IN

ITS CASE AGAINST IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT AGAINST

CHINA OVER THE DISPUTED ISLANDS IN THE PHILIPPINE SEA?”

MAR 2016

INTRO STATEMENT: Ang Pilipinas ay nagpasyang dalhin ang isyu sa isang independiyente at internasyunal na hukuman, ang United Nations Permanent Court Of

Arbitration (Arbitral Tribunal), para sa mapayapang resolusyon ng pagtatalo sa pagitan ng Pilipinas at Tsina ukol sa West Philippine Sea nang naaayon sa batas

internasyunal. Tutol naman ang Tsina sa ginawa na ito ng Pilipinas

Q203. 203. Gaano po kayo nagtitiwala na ang Pilipinas ay mananalo sa kaso nito sa internasyunal na hukuman laban sa Tsina tungkol pagtatalo tungkol sa West

Philippine Sea?

Very confident Somewhat confidentNot too

confidentNot confident

at all


NET* TRUST IN THE UNITED STATES, AUSTRALIA, CHINA,

RUSSIA, AND JAPAN: PHILIPPINES, DEC 1994 TO DEC 2016

* NET trust = % Much trust minus Little trust correctly rounded. Don’t Know and Refused responses are not shown.

CHN, +9

USA, +59

AUS, +37


China

United States

Australia

JapanJPN, +37

1994 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

+10

+30

+50

+70

+90

-10

-30

-50

RUS, +9

Russia


Copyright © 2017


41

The 2017 SWS Survey Review100

9 Public safety:Long-term decline in crime

victimization; recent rise in

fears for personal security


CRIME VICTIMIZATION OF ANY FAMILY MEMBER WITHIN

THE PAST 6 MONTHS: PHILIPPINES, FEB 1989 TO DEC 2016


Question. Nais po naming malaman ang karanasan ninyo at ng iba pang miyembro ng inyong pamilyang nakatira dito, tungkol sa krimen. Kayo po ba o kahit na sinong miyembro ng inyong pamilya ay naging biktima ng… (SHUFFLE CARDS)?

Break-in, 1.8%

Physicalviolence, 0.7%Carnap, 0.5%

Pickpocket/Robbery, 3.4%

% o

f

fam

ilie

s

5

10

15

1989 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016


Copyright © 2017


42


1986 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016

30

40

50

60

70

NEIGHBORHOOD FEARS, JUN 1985 TO DEC 2016


% F

EA

RF

UL

Percentage of those who agree with the statement "In this neighborhood, ... * “people are usually afraid that robbers might break into their houses.”; ** “people are usually afraid to walk in the streets at night because it is not safe.”; *** “there are already very many people addicted to banned drugs.”

63%

52%54%

Fear of burglary

Many drug addictsUnsafe streets


10 Government campaign

against illegal drugs:Great worries about EJKs;

satisfaction with the admin so far


Copyright © 2017


43


EXTENT OF WORRY THAT SOMEONE FROM ONE’S FAMILY WILL

BE A VICTIM OF EXTRA-JUDICIAL KILLING OR EJK, DEC 2016

Q145: Gaano po kayo nangangamba na kayo o sino mang kilala ninyo ay maging biktima ng ‘Extra Judicial Killing o EJK’? Kayo po baay.. (SHOWCARD)? TALAGANG NANGANGAMBA, MEDYO NANGANGAMBA, MEDYO HINDI NANGANGAMBA, O TALAGANG HINDI NANGANGAMBA

Not worried

at all

Not too

worried

Somewhat

worried

Very worried

% o

f a

du

lts


IMPORTANCE OF KEEPING ILLEGAL DRUG TRADE

SUSPECTS ALIVE, SEP AND DEC 2016

Note: % Refused is not shown.

Q140: Sa pagtupad ng kapulisan ng kanilang tungkulin sa kampanya laban sa illegal na droga, gaano ka-importante na mahuli nila nang buhay ang mga taong pinaghihinalaang kasabwat sa illegal na droga? Ito po ba ay… (SHOWCARD) TAGALANG IMPORTANTE, MEDYO IMPORTANTE, MEDYO HINDI IMPORTANTE, O TALAGANG HINDI IMPORTANTE?

% o

f a

du

lts

Very

important

Somewhat

important

Somewhat not

important

Not at all

important


Copyright © 2017


44


SERIOUSNESS OF THE EXTRA-JUDICIAL KILLINGS OR EJK

PROBLEM IN THE PRESENT ADMINISTRATION, DEC 2016

Note: % No answer is not shown.

Q143: `Extra-Judicial Killing o EJK' ang tawag sa pagpatay sa isang tao na walang pahintulot ng batas. Kadalasan itong ginagawa ng mga di-kilalang taong naka-motor; posible ding ginagawa ng mga pulis o militar para takpan ang kanilang pagkasangkot sa mga KRIMINAL na gawain. Gaano ka-seryoso, sa palagay ninyo, ang ‘EJK’ sa kasalukuyang administrasyon? (SHOWCARD) TALAGANG SERYOSO, MEDYO SERYOSO, HINDI TIYAK KUNG SERYOSO O HINDI SERYOSO, MEDYO HINDI SERYOSO, O TALAGANG HINDI SERYOSO.

Not serious

at allSomewhat

not serious

Undecided

Somewhat

serious

Very serious

% o

f a

du

lts


OPINION ON WHETHER THE POLICE ARE TELLING THE TRUTH

THAT THE SUSPECTS THEY KILLED REALLY RESISTED ARREST,

DEC 2016

Note: % No answer and Refused are not shown.

Q141: Sa kampanya ng gobyerno laban sa illegal na droga, ang kapulisan po ba ay … (SHOWCARD) nagsasabi ng totoo na ang napapatay nilang suspect ay talagang nanlaban sa kanila? TALAGANG NAGSASABI NG TOTOO, MALAMANG NAGSASABI NG TOTOO, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NAGSASABI NG TOTOO O HINDI, MALAMANG HINDI NAGSASABI NG TOTOO, O TALAGANG HINDI NAGSASABI NG TOTOO

Definitely the truth

Probably

the truth

Undecided

Probably not

the truth

Definitely not

the truth

% o

f a

du

lts


Copyright © 2017


45


SATISFACTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE

ADMINISTRATION IN ITS CAMPAIGN AGAINST ILLEGAL DRUGS,

SEP AND DEC 2016

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded.Note: % Refused is not shown.

Q139: Maaari po bang pakisabi ninyo kung gaano kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa kasalukuyang kampanya ng ADMINISTRASYON laban sa illegal na droga. Kayo ba ay… (SHOWCARD) LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, O LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN?

Net*

+76

+77% o

f a

du

lts

Very

satisfied

Somewhat

satisfied

Somewhat

dissatisfiedVery

dissatisfied

Undecided


AGREEMENT WITH THE TEST STATEMENT: “FROM THE TIME

WHEN RODY DUTERTE BECAME PRESIDENT, THERE HAS BEEN

A DECREASE IN THE DRUG PROBLEM IN MY AREA,” DEC 2016

Note: % Don’t know and Refused are not shown.

Q142. Gaano po kayo sumasang-ayon o hindi sumasang-ayon sa pangungusap na ito: “Mula noong naging Pangulo si Rody Duterte, nabawasan na ang problema ng illegal na droga sa aming lugar” … (SHOWCARD) LUBOS NA SANG-AYON, MEDYO SANG-AYON, HINDI TIYAK KUNG SANG-AYON O HINDI SANG-AYON, MEDYO HINDI SANG-AYON, O LUBOS NA HINDI SANG-AYON.

Strongly

agree

Somewhat

agree

Undecided

Somewhat

disagree

Strongly

disagree

% o

f a

du

lts


Copyright © 2017


46


SERIOUSNESS OF THE ADMINISTRATION ON SOLVING EXTRA-

JUDICIAL KILLINGS OR EJK CASES IN THE COUNTRY, DEC 2016

Q144: Sa inyong palagay, SERYOSO ba o HINDI SERYOSO ang pamahalaan na masolusyunan ang problema ng “Extra-Judicial Killing” o EJK sa bansa? (SHOWCARD) TALAGANG SERYOSO, MEDYO SERYOSO, HINDI TIYAK KUNG SERYOSO O HINDI SERYOSO, MEDYO HINDI SERYOSO, O TALAGANG HINDI SERYOSO

Not serious

at allSomewhat

not serious

Undecided

Somewhat

serious

Very serious

% o

f a

du

lts


11 The business climate,

according to businessmen –Since 2012, very good for business


Copyright © 2017


47


BUSINESSMEN’S SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL

GOVERNMENT IN PROMOTING A GOOD BUSINESS CLIMATE,

2007 – 2016

Satisfied

Undecided

Dissatisfied

Q136. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the National Government’s performance in promoting a good climate for

business in the Philippines?

ARROYO B. AQUINO


BUSINESSMEN’S EXPECTATIONS IN THE NEXT 2 YEARS,

2000 – 2016

Very Poor

Poor

Fair

Excellent

Good

Q138. In the next 2 years, do you expect that business conditions will be…?



Copyright © 2017


48


SUMMARY-1

1 Public morale: very high, since 2010

2 Poverty and Hunger: declining since 2014

3 Surveys of businessmen about corruption:

less under Pnoy than under PGMA (latest,

Feb-May 2016)

4 The 2016 election: clear win for Duterte; VP

race uncallable; the debates mattered

5 The President: a normal honeymoon so far


SUMMARY-2

6 Satisfaction with other officials and

institutions: VP, SP, Spkr, CJ – fair; Senate,

Hrep, SC, Cabinet – more similar to Pnoy

time

7 Report Cards of the national administration:

PNoy time the best of the past 5 admins;

PRRD time following suit

8 Foreign affairs: Support for the WPS case

against China; still much trust in the US,

trust in China and Russia turn positive

neutral


Copyright © 2017


49


SUMMARY-3

9 Public safety: Long-term decline in crime

victimization; recent rise in fears for

personal security

10 Government campaign against illegal drugs:

Great worries about EJKs; satisfaction with

the admin so far

11 The business climate, according to

businessmen: Since 2012, very good for

business

www.sws.org.ph#52 Malingap Street,

Sikatuna Village, Quezon City

Tels: 926-4308, 924-4456, 924-4458, 924-4465 E-mail: [email protected]

The SWS

Annual Survey

Reviews

2017 Edition

containing the full presentations of

the SWS Survey Reviews from

2001 to 2017 is available in CD-

ROM at the SWS Survey Data

Archives and Library.

Inquire with Leo Laroza

<[email protected]>

at 924-4456 or 924-4458.

sws survey review sws survey review_march... · the 2017 sws survey review 9 satisfaction with...

Documents