status of the recycler
DESCRIPTION
Status of the Recycler. Paul Derwent DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 27, 2007. The Recycler. Fixed energy (8 GeV) Permanent magnet storage ring Same tunnel as Main Injector Antiproton ‘stash’ for Collider operation Goals: 600e10 54 eV s 10 mm mr (95% normalized) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
f
Status of the RecyclerStatus of the Recycler
Paul DerwentDOE Tevatron Operations Review
March 27, 2007
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 2
f The RecyclerThe Recycler
Fixed energy (8 GeV) Permanent magnet storage ring Same tunnel as Main Injector Antiproton ‘stash’ for Collider operation
Goals:• 600e10• 54 eV s• 10 mm mr (95% normalized)• Extract 95% ~1/day
Accept transfers from Accumulator• ~25e10 every hour• <15 eV s• <12 mm mr (95% normalized)
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 3
f Beam CoolingBeam Cooling
Mixture of stochastic and electron cooling Stochastic:
• 0.5-1 GHz and 1-2 GHz momentum• 2-4 GHz transverse • Cooling rate proportional to beam intensity
• Cool injected beam before merging into cold stash
Electron Cooling:• 0.5 A 4.34 MeV electron beam• Need transverse overlap of antiproton and electron
beam• Cooling rate independent of beam intensity
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 4
f Electron CoolingElectron Cooling Electron beam: 4.34 MeV – 0.5
Amps DC – 200rad angular spread
Max beam current 730 mA Circulated in cooling section
In U-Bend mode currents of 1500 mA has been obtained.
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 5
f Recycler OperationRecycler Operation
Fully integrated into Collider operations All collider stores in last year are “Recycler Only”
Routinely provide >250e10 for Collider stores Max: ~440e10 Longitudinal Emittance: 50-80 eV s Transverse Emittance: 3-7 mm mr (95%
normalized)
~40e10 every 2.5 hours
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 6
f Typical WeekTypical Week
Recycler Stash & Accumulator Stack for a week 43 transfers from Accumulator to Recycler 5 transfers from Recycler to Tevatron
• ~310e10 available, transfer out 95%• 5-7 mm mr (95% normalized)
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 7
f HighlightsHighlights
Change in Working point: Space charge tune shifts
• pbar beam as function of intensity / density [0.425,0.415] -> [0.455,0.463] Improvement in Lifetime at large stashes
Implementation of Adaptive Feed Forward RF Correction Uniform bunch intensity for collider operation
Optimization of procedures for large stashes Cooling performance Extraction performance
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 8
f Tune footprintTune footprint
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.4
Current working point and its shift with intensity
Approximate tune spread before mining
Approximate tune spread in the mined state
Tune diagram with resonance lines up to 5th order. At mining, axial particles may reach 3rd resonance lines.
Original Working point
A. Shemyakin
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 9
f Adaptive RF CorrectionAdaptive RF Correction
Implementation of adaptive feed forward RF correction Integral of barrier buckets gives a flat potential well Flat potential well -> uniform time distribution For extraction, grow additional barrier buckets to make 9 slices which are
transferred to Tevatron Uniform time distribution -> uniform bunch density in Tevatron
Martin Hu, Dan Broemmelsiek, Nathan Eddy
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 10
f ImplementationImplementation
Correction Off Correction On
Martin Hu, Dan Broemmelsiek, Nathan Eddy
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 11
f Change in Tevatron Bunch StructureChange in Tevatron Bunch Structure
Store 5008Without Correction:
100% variation25% RMS
Store 5245With Correction:
25% variation7% RMS
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 12
f LowlightsLowlights
DCCT (main intensity monitor) failed in December Impact on measurement of:
• Transfer efficiencies• Lifetimes• Schottky emittance measurements
Alternative monitors: • Sensitive to AC components : changes in RF structure• Toroid• Resistive wall monitor
Have replacement in hand, will occur during shutdown
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 13
f SummarySummary
Recycler is fully integrated into Tevatron operations
Operational improvements contribute to Collider Performance Tune working point Adaptive RF correction
Pushing beam intensities and luminosities
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 14
f BackupsBackups
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 15
f Extraction WaveformsExtraction Waveforms
RF Mining Waveform
Each Parcel is extractedand bunched at 2.5MHz
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 16
f Tune shift estimationTune shift estimation
Two effects The beam interacts with image charges and currents
(coherent tune shift) Motion of an individual particle is affected by the beam’s
space charge and image charges and currents (incoherent tune shift)
y0y a
h
h
Effect of the image charges and currents in the vacuum chamber, magnets, and magnetic shielding is modeled by two plates.The current density is assumed to be constant across the beam.
For estimations, h = 20 mm (RR vacuum chamber is 100 X 48 mm)
A. Shemyakin, Recycler Dept
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 17
f Tune shift estimation Tune shift estimation
Space charge tune shift (round beam)
Incoherent tune shift
Coherent tune shift
Formulas are from Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering, by A.Chao and M.Tigner
BFmradmm
N
BFa
NPr
n
ppRRpsc ][
]10[012.0
)2( 95
12
2332
95
222
15.01
138
1
nsc
scLaslettsc
x
yinc
BF
BFh
a
1295 100018.015.0 pnsc
xy
cohNBF
Symbols:
rp – classical proton radius
Np – number of pbars
PRR- RR perimeter
- RR tune (25)
, - relativistic factors
a- beam radius
BF- bunching factor, jav/jmax
n95- transverse normalized 95% emittanceA. Shemyakin, Recycler Dept
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 18
f NumbersNumbers
In this case, the main factor that determines crossing resonances by individual particles is the direct space-charge field.
However, in tune measurements we see only the coherent tune shift.
15.01024.0 xy
inc
Estimation for Np = 200, BF~ 0.5, n95~ 2 :
0036.0xy
coh
A. Shemyakin, Recycler Dept
2007 DOE Tevatron Operations Review – Paul Derwent 19
f SummarySummary
Measured tune shift due to pbar space charge is in agreement with a simple estimation.
The estimated incoherent tune shift is significantly larger and goes as high as 0.1 in the time of mining.
The tunes change ~ 0.001 after turning on electron cooling. The change takes ~0.5 hr, correlates with changes in the peak pbar density, and has no explanation.
The power in 21 MHz signal correlates rather with coldness of pbars then with the presence of the electron beam.
A response to the increase of the e-beam current from 0.1 to 0.2 A is ~ -310-5 and doesn’t contradict to an estimation.
Response to turning off the clearing voltage in the cooling section is small and corresponds to , i.e. ~ 1% relative density of secondary electrons. The 10% density required to explain the radial dependence of the drag force and the discrepancy of the electron beam size measurement does contradict to the measurement.
1~sec_2
e
e
nn
A. Shemyakin, Recycler Dept