status of compliance & data reporting
TRANSCRIPT
Status of Compliance, Data Reporting, Status of Compliance, Data Reporting, Licensing Systems and Ratification Licensing Systems and Ratification
in the ECA and EIT countriesin the ECA and EIT countries
Meeting of the Regional Ozone Network Meeting of the Regional Ozone Network for Europe & Central Asia (ECA)for Europe & Central Asia (ECA)
Belgrade, 10Belgrade, 10--13 May 201113 May 2011
Ozone SecretariatOzone SecretariatSophia MylonaSophia Mylona
Monitoring and Compliance OfficerMonitoring and Compliance Officer
Content of PresentationContent of Presentation
�� Outline of Protocol’s Control measures for Outline of Protocol’s Control measures for
Article 5 PartiesArticle 5 Parties
�� Status of data reporting by ECA/EIT countriesStatus of data reporting by ECA/EIT countries
�� Compliance issues to be considered by the Compliance issues to be considered by the �� Compliance issues to be considered by the Compliance issues to be considered by the
Implementation CommitteeImplementation Committee
�� Status of licensing systemsStatus of licensing systems
�� Status of ratification Status of ratification
�� Challenges regarding trade in HCFCs Challenges regarding trade in HCFCs
A5 Party Control Measures 2009 A5 Party Control Measures 2009 –– 20102010(Consumption & Production)(Consumption & Production)
ODSODS BaselineBaseline 20092009 20102010
A/I A/I (CFC)(CFC) Average ofAverage of19951995--19971997
85%85% 100%100%
A/II A/II (Halons)(Halons) 50%50% 100%100%
B/I B/I (other CFC)(other CFC) Average of Average of 19981998--20002000
85%85% 100%100%19981998--20002000
B/II B/II (carbon tetrachloride)(carbon tetrachloride) 85%85% 100%100%
B/III B/III (methyl chloroform)(methyl chloroform) Average of Average of 19981998--20002000
30%30% 70%70%
C/II C/II (HBFC)(HBFC) NoneNone 100%100% 100%100%
C/III C/III (BCM)(BCM) NoneNone 100%100% 100%100%
E E (Methyl Bromide)(Methyl Bromide) Average of Average of 19951995--9898
20%20% 20%20%
A5 Party Control MeasuresA5 Party Control Measures(Consumption & Production)(Consumption & Production)
ODSODS 20102010 20132013 20152015 20202020 20252025 20302030 20402040
CFCsCFCsHalonsHalonsCTCCTCHBFCHBFCBCMBCM
100%100%
BCMBCM
Methyl Methyl ChloroformChloroform
70%70% 100%100%
HCFCsHCFCsFreeze at Freeze at averageaverage20092009--10 10
10%10% 35%35% 67.5%67.5% 100%100%** 100%100%
Methyl Methyl BromideBromide
20%20% 100%100%
*Allowing for servicing an annual average of 2.5% during 2030-40
Status of Data Reporting under Article 7Status of Data Reporting under Article 72010 Milestone2010 Milestone
��ECA Countries that achieved the 2010 Milestone by 2008:ECA Countries that achieved the 2010 Milestone by 2008:Albania, Georgia, Republic of Moldova, Albania, Georgia, Republic of Moldova, FYR of Macedonia, Turkey FYR of Macedonia, Turkey
CEIT that have also done so:CEIT that have also done so:Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Ukraine, UzbekistanUkraine, UzbekistanUkraine, UzbekistanUkraine, Uzbekistan
��ECA Countries that achieved the 2010 Milestone by 2009:ECA Countries that achieved the 2010 Milestone by 2009:Bosnia and Herzegovina and MontenegroBosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro
As we are in 2011, all countries must already have zero As we are in 2011, all countries must already have zero CFC, halons and CTC consumption and production; CFC, halons and CTC consumption and production; Countries that achieved the 2010 milestone need to Countries that achieved the 2010 milestone need to sustain zero levelssustain zero levels
2010 Milestone 2010 Milestone –– How well are the rest of the count ries doing?How well are the rest of the countries doing?Consumption Consumption –– ODP tonnesODP tonnes
ODSODS PartyParty BaselineBaseline 20082008 20092009 20102010
CFCsCFCs
ArmeniaArmenia 196.5196.5 13.613.6 18.118.1 ??
KyrgyzstanKyrgyzstan 72.872.8 5.05.0 2.72.7 ??
Russian Fed.Russian Fed. 100352.0100352.0 324.0324.0 263.1263.1 ??
SerbiaSerbia 849.2849.2 76.776.7 19.219.2 ??
TurkmenistanTurkmenistan 37.337.3 1.21.2 3.33.3 ??
HalonsHalons SerbiaSerbia 3.83.8 1.81.8 1.51.5 ??
CTCCTCCroatiaCroatia 3.93.9 0.20.2 0.40.4 ??
SerbiaSerbia 18.818.8 2.12.1 1.51.5 ??
TurkmenistanTurkmenistan 0.00.0 0.30.3 0.00.0 ??
Article 7 Data Reporting for 2010Article 7 Data Reporting for 2010
�� 12 out of 196 Parties reported to date12 out of 196 Parties reported to date
�� 3 ECA/CEIT countries reported so far: 3 ECA/CEIT countries reported so far: Rep. of Moldova, FYR of Macedonia, TajikistanRep. of Moldova, FYR of Macedonia, Tajikistan
Submissions should address relevant provisions Submissions should address relevant provisions of Decisions: of Decisions:
�� XX/6 and XXI/15 on QPS uses of Methyl BromideXX/6 and XXI/15 on QPS uses of Methyl Bromide�� X/14, XXI/3 and XXII/8 on ODS used as process X/14, XXI/3 and XXII/8 on ODS used as process
agentsagents
Reporting on Methyl Bromide use Reporting on Methyl Bromide use for Quarantine and Prefor Quarantine and Pre --shipment shipment
PurposesPurposesDecisions XX/6 & XXI/15Decisions XX/6 & XXI/15
Parties must report the amount of methyl bromide Parties must report the amount of methyl bromide used for used for
QPS applications annually as required by the MPQPS applications annually as required by the MP
�� The Secretariat now posts QPS data on the web The Secretariat now posts QPS data on the web �� The Secretariat now posts QPS data on the web The Secretariat now posts QPS data on the web
�� Non reporting of QPS will be reviewed by the Non reporting of QPS will be reviewed by the Implementation Committee and may be treated as Implementation Committee and may be treated as non compliance (Dec. XX/6)non compliance (Dec. XX/6)
�� Outstanding QPS data for previous years also to be Outstanding QPS data for previous years also to be reported (Dec. XXI/15)reported (Dec. XXI/15)
QPS Reporting QPS Reporting
Only Only 77 ECA/CEIT Parties have reported QPS ECA/CEIT Parties have reported QPS consumption consumption
in the last yearsin the last years (Consumption, ODP tonnes):(Consumption, ODP tonnes):PartyParty 20062006 20072007 20082008 20092009
BelarusBelarus 0.60.6
GeorgiaGeorgia 6.06.0 0.60.6 1.21.2
KyrgyzstanKyrgyzstan 0.30.3 0.60.6
Russian federationRussian federation 88.888.8 19.919.9
TajikistanTajikistan 3.83.8 3.83.8 2.92.9 1.01.0
TurkeyTurkey 12.612.6 21.621.6 12.612.6 16.216.2
TurkmenistanTurkmenistan 3.13.1
Reporting on Process agentsReporting on Process agentsDecisions X/14, XXI/3 and XXII/8Decisions X/14, XXI/3 and XXII/8
�� Parties with process agents uses must report the Parties with process agents uses must report the information required by Decision X/14 by 30.9. information required by Decision X/14 by 30.9.
each yeareach year
�� For Parties with no such uses, Decision XXI/3 says: For Parties with no such uses, Decision XXI/3 says: you do not have to report on this annually once you you do not have to report on this annually once you
inform inform the Secretariat you do not use ODS as process the Secretariat you do not use ODS as process
agents as agents as under Dec. X/14, unless you start using it at some under Dec. X/14, unless you start using it at some
pointpoint
�� In Decision XXII/8 all Parties were requested to In Decision XXII/8 all Parties were requested to report to report to
the Secretariat on their process agents uses by the Secretariat on their process agents uses by
Confirmation thatConfirmation thatControlled OzoneControlled Ozone--Depleting Substances are Not Used as Process AgentsDepleting Substances are Not Used as Process Agents
Party: .................................................Party: .................................................
With reference to Decision XXI/3 of the TwentyWith reference to Decision XXI/3 of the Twenty--first Meeting of the Parties to first Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol, I hereby confirm that ...................................... (Party) the Montreal Protocol, I hereby confirm that ...................................... (Party) does not use controlled substances as process uses.does not use controlled substances as process uses.
Comments (if any) ...............................................................................................Comments (if any) ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Name of reporting officer: ............................. Signature: ....................................Name of reporting officer: ............................. Signature: ....................................Designation: ........................................................................................................Designation: ........................................................................................................Organization: ......................................................................................................Organization: ......................................................................................................Postal Address: ..................................................................................................Postal Address: ..................................................................................................Country: ..............................................................................................................Country: ..............................................................................................................Phone: ................................................................................................................Phone: ................................................................................................................Fax: ....................................................................................................................Fax: ....................................................................................................................EE--Mail: ................................................................................................................Mail: ................................................................................................................Date: ...................................................................................................................Date: ...................................................................................................................
Process agentsProcess agents …cont…cont
Responses on the Secretariat’s communication Responses on the Secretariat’s communication on process agents have been received by the on process agents have been received by the following countries:following countries:
ECA:ECA: Armenia, Croatia, FYR of Macedonia, Armenia, Croatia, FYR of Macedonia, ECA:ECA: Armenia, Croatia, FYR of Macedonia, Armenia, Croatia, FYR of Macedonia, Montenegro, TurkmenistanMontenegro, Turkmenistan
CEIT:CEIT: Belarus, Tajikistan, UzbekistanBelarus, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan
Please send your response as soon as possible!Please send your response as soon as possible!
Reporting on HCFCsReporting on HCFCsECA RegionECA Region (Consumption, ODP tonnes)(Consumption, ODP tonnes)
PartyParty 20082008 20092009 PartyParty 20082008 20092009
AlbaniaAlbania 4.14.1 5.45.4 MontenegroMontenegro 0.40.4 0.90.9
ArmeniaArmenia 4.84.8 6.86.8 Rep. of MoldovaRep. of Moldova11 2.82.8 1.21.2
Bosnia & HerzegovinaBosnia & Herzegovina 7.67.6 6.06.0 SerbiaSerbia 7.47.4 9.09.0Bosnia & HerzegovinaBosnia & Herzegovina 7.67.6 6.06.0 SerbiaSerbia 7.47.4 9.09.0
CroatiaCroatia 7.57.5 4.64.6 FYR of MacedoniaFYR of Macedonia22 3.53.5 4.04.0
GeorgiaGeorgia 5.95.9 4.64.6 TurkeyTurkey 762.6762.6 609.9609.9
KyrgyzstanKyrgyzstan 7.47.4 4.44.4 TurkmenistanTurkmenistan 8.68.6 6.96.9
11 Reported 0.7 ODP tonnes in 2010 Reported 0.7 ODP tonnes in 2010 22 Reported 3.0 ODP tonnes in 2010Reported 3.0 ODP tonnes in 2010
Continuing Challenges Continuing Challenges – – HCFCsHCFCsCEIT RegionCEIT Region (Consumption, ODP tonnes)(Consumption, ODP tonnes)
PartyParty 20082008 20092009 20102010
AzerbaijanAzerbaijan 0.80.8 3.53.5 ??
BelarusBelarus 0.40.4 10.410.4 ??
KazakhstanKazakhstan 62.862.8 63.063.0 ??KazakhstanKazakhstan 62.862.8 63.063.0 ??
Russian FederationRussian Federation 1133.61133.6 936.6936.6 ??
TajikistanTajikistan 3.93.9 2.62.6 2.82.8
UkraineUkraine 75.075.0 63.563.5 ??
UzbekistanUzbekistan 2.32.3 1.81.8 ??
CountryCountry--specific Compliance issues specific Compliance issues to be considered by the Implementation Committee to be considered by the Implementation Committee
(46(46thth meeting, 28meeting, 28--29 July 2011)29 July 2011)
�� Bosnia and Herzegovina (Decision XXI/18)Bosnia and Herzegovina (Decision XXI/18)Existing plan of action to return to compliance with Existing plan of action to return to compliance with its 2010 benchmark for CFCsits 2010 benchmark for CFCs
�� TajikistanTajikistanReview of information on its request for change of Review of information on its request for change of baseline data for HCFCs baseline data for HCFCs (Decisions XIII/15 and XV/19) (Decisions XIII/15 and XV/19)
(Baseline for HCFC consumption for non(Baseline for HCFC consumption for non--A5 Parties: A5 Parties: 1989 HCFC consumption + 2.8% CFC consumption)1989 HCFC consumption + 2.8% CFC consumption)
Status of Licensing SystemsStatus of Licensing Systems�� All Parties that ratified the Montreal Amendment All Parties that ratified the Montreal Amendment
must have a system to license imports and exports must have a system to license imports and exports of ALL ODSof ALL ODS
�� All such ECA/CEIT Parties reported establishment and All such ECA/CEIT Parties reported establishment and operation of licensing systemsoperation of licensing systemsoperation of licensing systemsoperation of licensing systemsKazakhstan has also done soKazakhstan has also done so (no legal obligation)(no legal obligation)
�� However, more than cursory compliance is essential to However, more than cursory compliance is essential to ensure phaseensure phase--out out –– Are all ODS, including HCFCs Are all ODS, including HCFCs and MeBr, licensed in your country? If yes, how and MeBr, licensed in your country? If yes, how efficient is the licensing? If not, how do you inte nd efficient is the licensing? If not, how do you inte nd to improve it?to improve it?
Critical Nature of HCFC LicensingCritical Nature of HCFC Licensing
�� The HCFC freeze is only 2 years away, The HCFC freeze is only 2 years away, and the and the 10% reduction is only 4 years away10% reduction is only 4 years away
�� Almost all HCFC consumption in the ECA Almost all HCFC consumption in the ECA region is in refrigerant servicingregion is in refrigerant servicing
�� How will you meet the freeze in 2013 and How will you meet the freeze in 2013 and the the 10% reduction by 2015?10% reduction by 2015? Acute question if Acute question if
your your
Status of Ratification Status of Ratification – –Montreal Protocol and its four AmendmentsMontreal Protocol and its four Amendments
�� Montreal Protocol ratified universallyMontreal Protocol ratified universally
�� 11 out of 12 ECA countries ratified all Amendments11 out of 12 ECA countries ratified all Amendments(Georgia ratified BA on 8 April 2011)(Georgia ratified BA on 8 April 2011)(Georgia ratified BA on 8 April 2011)(Georgia ratified BA on 8 April 2011)
�� 5 out of 7 CEIT ratified all Amendments5 out of 7 CEIT ratified all Amendments
Montreal Protocol Amendments Montreal Protocol Amendments ––Countries with Outstanding Ratifications Countries with Outstanding Ratifications
in the ECA/CEIT regionin the ECA/CEIT region
CountryCountry London London 19901990
Copenhagen Copenhagen 19921992
Montreal Montreal 19971997
Beijing Beijing 19991999
AzerbaijanAzerbaijan ✔✔ ✔✔ ✔✔ NRNRAzerbaijanAzerbaijan ✔✔ ✔✔ ✔✔ NRNR
Bosnia & Bosnia & HerzegovinaHerzegovina ✔✔ ✔✔ ✔✔ NRNR
KazakhstanKazakhstan ✔✔ NRNR NRNR NRNR
Decision XX/9:Decision XX/9: Application of Trade Application of Trade Provisions of the Protocol to HCFCsProvisions of the Protocol to HCFCs
�� Decision XX/9Decision XX/9 changed a past decision changed a past decision (XV/3) (XV/3) to make clear that the trade provisions will to make clear that the trade provisions will apply to developing country trade in HCFCs apply to developing country trade in HCFCs apply to developing country trade in HCFCs apply to developing country trade in HCFCs beginning 1 January 2013 (instead of beginning 1 January 2013 (instead of
1.1.2016)1.1.2016)
�� This means is that if the Beijing Amendment This means is that if the Beijing Amendment has not has not entered into force for your country by that entered into force for your country by that
date, date,
