setting & assessing conservation objectives for highly...

44
Setting & Assessing Conservation Objectives for Highly Mobile Species Peter G.H. Evans Sea Watch Foundation & University of Wales Bangor

Upload: donhi

Post on 24-May-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Setting & Assessing Conservation

Objectives for Highly Mobile Species

Peter G.H. Evans

Sea Watch Foundation & University of Wales Bangor

Seasonal Central Place Foragers: Seabirds

Northern Gannet Eight Seabird Species

Source: RSPB, 2015 Source: Wakefield et al., 2013

a) Adults b) Pups

CENTRAL PLACE FORAGING OF ATLANTIC GREY SEALS

Source: SCOS (2013)

a) Grey seal usage b) Harbour seal usage

Source: SCOS (2013)

MARINE PROTECTED AREAS FOR TURTLES

Source: Scott et al, 2012;

Stokes et al., 2015

• Post-nesting green turtle

satellite tracks

• Ten main foraging

grounds

• Effectiveness of location of

IUCN MPAs in capturing

foraging locations

• Significantly more turtles

were observed (white bars) to

be foraging in MPAs than

expected (black bars) at both

global and regional scales for

all ocean basins

PORPOISE MOVEMENTS AS REVEALED BY SATELLITE TELEMETRY

Source: Sveegaard & Teilmann, 2007; Teilmann et al., 2008

No. tagged = 62 harbour porpoises; Period of tagging: 1992-2007

>300km

Predicting seabird foraging distribution at the UK-scale

Kittiwake UK

foraging distribution

Foraging preferences from

studied colonies

Sediment type

Thermal fronts

Water depth

Plankton

Colony size and

location

HIGH DENSITY AREAS FOR HARBOUR PORPOISE FROM RADIO TELEMETRY STUDIES

Source: Sveegaard et al., 2011

n = 64

Period: 1997-2007

DESIGNATED SACs CONTAINING HARBOUR PORPOISE

Cetaceans

Monk Seals

Marine Birds

Marine Turtles

Sharks & Rays

Bluefin Tuna

Notarbartolo di Sciara and Hoyt (2008): Species information for managing MPAs:

Access and Integration IUCN WCC, Barcelona, Oct. 2008

cetaceans + monk seal + birds + turtles + sharks + bluefin tuna

ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT AREAS (EBSAs)

Natura 2000 Conservation Objectives

To maintain (or restore) the habitat and species features, as a

whole, at (or to) Favourable Conservation Status within the site

For species such as bottlenose dolphin & harbour porpoise:

• Population Dynamics

Population Structure – demographically distinct populations

Population Size – absolute abundance

Reproductive Success – birth rates & juvenile survival

Physiological Health – causes of mortality, body condition

• Range

• Habitat

Distribution and Extent

Structure, Function and Quality

• Management of Activities and Operations

• Strong offshore

component along

shelf edge

• In Britain, two main

coastal populations: in West

Wales & East Scotland

Source: Veneruso & Evans, 2012

THE CHALLENGE OF AREA-BASED PROTECTION

Source: Veneruso & Evans, 2012

• 64% (141/221) of individuals recorded in both Cardigan Bay SAC and unprotected areas in North Wales

Bottlenose Dolphin Photo-ID in Wales

• 78% (172/221) of individuals recorded in one or both SACs also occurred in North Wales

• 15% (33/221) of individuals recorded only in Cardigan Bay SAC

Cardigan Bay SAC

Pen Llyn a’r Sarnau SAC

Winter

Summer

Monitoring methods

Line-transect design for abundance & distribution

Source: Feingold & Evans, 2014

• Vary survey effort between areas

• Select transects at random

Line-transect surveys in Cardigan Bay SAC

Source: Veneruso & Evans, 2012; Feingold & Evans, 2014

CVs vary from 0.27-0.41

Monitoring methods

Bottlenose Dolphin Harbour Porpoise

CVs vary from 0.15-0.46

BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN POPULATION TRENDS IN CARDIGAN BAY, 2001-14

a) Within SAC

b) Over wider Cardigan Bay

Blue line = whole population estimate Black line = moving average trend Red line = polynomial trend

Modelling Distribution

Patterns in Cardigan Bay

Source: Pesante et al., 2008

BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN

PERIOD 1

PERIOD 2

ZONING APPROACH TO AREA PROTECTION

Source: Pesante et al., 2008; Baines & Evans, 2012; Feingold & Evans, 2014

The bottlenose dolphin in Wales

Summer

Winter

ANNUAL CYCLE & LIFE HISTORY

PARAMETERS OF THE HARBOUR PORPOISE

IN EUROPE

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Gestation Period : 10-11 months

Lactation Period: 4-10 months

Calving Interval: 1-2 years

MATING PERIOD

BIRTH PERIOD

Life span: c. 12; max. 24 years

Age at sex. maturity: 3-5 years

Dispersal: male biased

PROPORTION OF BIRTHS FROM IDENTIFIED BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN FEMALES BY MONTH FOR 2001-2014

Source: Feingold & Evans, 2014

NUMBER OF NEWBORNS IN CARDIGAN BAY SAC (top) AND WIDER CARDIGAN BAY (bottom), 2001-14

Source: Feingold & Evans, 2014

UK HARBOUR PORPOISE TRENDS IN CAUSES OF DEATH, 1991-2010

Source: UK Cetacean Strandings Investigation Programme

• Potting • Scallop Dredging • Sailing • Water Sports • Dolphin Watching

Human Activities

in Cardigan Bay

Wind farm

construction -

disturbance

from pile driving

Industrial

activities in

Liverpool Bay -

high levels of

PCBs, mercury

and lead

Human Activities in North Wales

Monitoring Human Activities

In Cardigan Bay

Source: Evans & Hintner, 2010; Lohrengel et al., 2012

Recreational

Vessels

Scallop

Dredging

KEY LESSONS LEARNED

• Make SACs/SPAs large for mobile species, taking account of

population structure

• Be prepared to zone activities within them

• Don’t be too restrictive, but ensure that the areas most

important for life functions (e.g. feeding, breeding & nursery

grounds) are well protected; consider areas that are hotspots

across taxa

• Monitor species populations beyond protected area boundaries

• Operate flexible management within protected areas,

responding in a timely fashion to change

• Provide adequate resources for monitoring and management;

without those, SACs/SPAs are little more than “paper parks”

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Funding for Past Monitoring

• Countryside Council for Wales/Natural Resources Wales

Sources of Information Used

• Sea Watch staff

• Mark Bolton, RSPB

• UK Special Committee on Seals

• Brendan Godley, University of Exeter

• Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara, Milano, Italy

• UK Cetacean Strandings Investigation Programme

• Signe Sveegaard, National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark

Max max Thaxter et al. 2012

Max max in FAME/STAR

Mean max Thaxter et al. 2012 max

Mean max in FAME/STAR

Shag 17km 24km 15km 14km

Kittiwake 120km 228km 60km 122km

Guillemot 135km 339km 84km 65km

Razorbill 95km 313km 49km 86km

Variation in foraging range across species

FAME data show massive variation in foraging range among colonies

Fair Isle longest trip = 313 km

Colonsay longest trip = 34 km

Seabird foraging areas and marine development

• widely distributed across the

Irish Sea

• main concentrations in Wales

are around principal headlands

• locally distributed, mainly coastal,

particularly in summer

• main summer concentrations are in

Cardigan Bay & in winter, N Wales

Source: Baines & Evans (2012) Atlas of Marine Mammals of Wales

HARBOUR PORPOISE & BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE IRISH SEA

1995-1999

2000-2004

2005-2009

HARBOUR PORPOISE DENSITIES IN THE IRISH SEA

Source: Baines & Evans (2012) Atlas of Marine Mammals of Wales

Line-transect surveys in Cardigan Bay SAC

Source: Veneruso & Evans, 2012; Feingold & Evans, 2014

Monitoring methods

Harbour Porpoise

CVs vary from 0.15-0.46

a) Cardigan Bay SAC

b) Entire Cardigan Bay

BIRTH RATES IN CARDIGAN BAY SAC (top) AND CARDIGAN BAY (bottom), 2001-14

The Relative Abundance of Bottlenose Dolphins at different levels

of Boat Traffic at New Quay, Cardigan Bay SAC

Source: Pierpoint et al., 2009

Statistical power to detect log-linear population trend after six years of annual monitoring over a range of annual rates of change and residual CVs

Source: L. Thomas (2008)

POWER ANALYSIS TO DETECT TRENDS

For an 80% power to detect a trend over 6 years with a CV of 0.2, an annual rate of decline of 0.15 is required, equivalent to loss of c. 60% of the population.

Source: Reid, Evans & Northridge (2003)

CETACEAN CANDIDATES FOR ANNEX II

TYPICAL LOGGERHEAD TURTLE TRACKS

LOGGERHEAD TURTLE TRACKS IN THE N ATLANTIC

THE SCOPE OF PROTECTIVE MEASURES

IN LIMITING IMPACTS

103

104

105

106

ACCOBAM

S

pollution

resource

depletion

bycatch

vessel

disturb.

MARPOL

MPA’s

OSPAR

ASCOBAN

S

IMPACTS PROTECTIVE MEASURES

103 103

103

104

104 104 105 105 106 106 ha

105

106