seed industry
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
1/18
National In
S
stitute o
SEED
Agricu
DINSec
tural Ex
DUStoral
tension
STRYRepo
Manage
Yt, 20
ent (MHy
9
NAGE)erabad
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
2/18
Page|2
CONTENTS
An Overview of the Industry- The Global Scenario- The Indian Seed Market- The Hybrid Seed Industry
3
3
4
5
Understanding Market Dynamics
- A Case of Hybrid Rice- A Case of hybrid Cotton
9
9
10
The Distribution Channels 12
Promotional Tools 13
The Way Forward 16
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
3/18
Page|3
An Overview
Seed is the most important input component for productive agriculture. In the significant advance
that India made in agriculture in the last four decades, the role of the seed sector has been
substantial. The expansion of the seed industry has occurred in parallel with growth in
agricultural productivity.
The global seed market:
The seed industry is undergoing a significant change towards providing farmers with high-yield
seeds and reduced production cost. GM seeds are expected to grow up from the fringes of crop
protection into newer potential applications, thus increasing the presence of biotechnology in the
industry.
The size of the world industry is USD 30 billion. It is expected to triple to USD 91 billion soon.
World seed market is projected to exhibit a CAGR of 4.27% over 2001-2010 and settle at about
US$42.2 billion by 2010. Europe, win an estimated share of 34.57% in 2008, is the largest
market for seed worldwide. In terms of growth, however, Asia-Pacific is forecast to surpass all
other regions with a forecast CAGR of 5.85% over the 2001-2010 period.
Grain seeds, with an estimated 2008 share of 32.70%, forms the largest product category in the
global seed market. In terms of growth, however, vegetable Seeds, with a CAGR forecast at
4.99%, are expected to outpace all other categories of seed.
(Source: Global Industry Analysts, Seed Quest News Section)
The Major Global Seed Players are shown below:
Company Seed Sales(USD
million)
% share of Global market
Monsanto (US) 4964 23DuPont (US) 3300 15Syngenta (Switzerland) 2018 9Groupe Limagrain (France) 1226 6Land OLakes (USA) 917 4KWS AG (Germany) 702 3
Bayer Crop Science(Germany)
524 2
Sakata (Japan) 396
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
4/18
Page|4
means to characterise and use it more effectively. Breeding cycles can be reduced, allowing new
products to be developed more quickly and with greater confidence.
The Indian Seed Market
The Indian seed industry is currently valued at Rs. 5000 crores and is growing at 12-13%
annually (According to Mr. Prabhakar Rao, President of National Seed Association of India, 9th
Nov, 2008, Asian Seed Congress). However the rate of growth of hybrid seeds in India is 13%
per year. Japan ranked first, India second and China third in the region in terms of trade volume
of seed business. If we look at the production capacity 70% of Indias seeds sales come from
farmer bred seeds, 26% from those bred in publicly financed institutions, and only 4% from
researched hybrids. The home market works out to about 3.7% of the global market.
As the organized Indian seed industry is just forty years old. Yet, its growth has been
phenomenal. India is among the few countries where the seed sector is already reasonably
advanced.
Evolution of Indian Seed Industry:
The Private Sector: The private sector in the seed industry is highly fragmented with an
estimated 300 players. The top 10 companies account for 25% of the total volume. (The Hindu
Businessline, 20th February, 2009) An estimated 250 companies operate as trading firms and
these generate an average turnover of Rs. 5 crore annually. The private sector accounts for 70%
of the market in terms of market turnover. The private sector accounts to 50% of the totalcertified seed production.
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
5/18
The Pu
and pri
CorporCorpor
remain
several
seeds.
support
These c
hybrid
The Hy
Hybrid
flowers
introdu
growin
Figure2:
The gr
about 5
market
blic Secto
vate secto
tion (NSCtions (SS
d virtually
developme
his was f
ed by the
orporation
eeds devel
brid Seed
seeds cam
, and more
e hybrid c
at a rate o
ropwiseMar
ph shows
9% of the
followed b
Cor
19
Rice
8%
Ma
: Like ma
seed bus
), the Stats). NSC
the only a
ntal progra
llowed by
orld Bank
engage pr
oped by th
ndustry
e into bei
recently t
otton seed
f 13% per
ketShareofH
that cotton
total hybri
rice with
n
ketSh
y agricultu
inesses. Gi
Farms Cas the fir
ency for s
mmes inclu
the settin
, and these
incipally in
public sec
g with m
o field cro
for comm
nnum.
brids(FieldCr
hybrids a
seed mar
8% share.
reofH
V
rally devel
ant public
rporationt public s
ed produc
ding traini
up of the
largely ado
production
or.
ize in 192
s and som
ercial culti
ops)invaluet
re most po
et in term
ybridF
luein
ped Asian
sector pla
f India (Sctor organ
ion for aro
g, quality
SSCs und
pted the rol
and mark
0s and bec
e forage c
ation. Pre
erms.Source:
pular amo
of value.
Cotton
59%
eldCro
008
nations, In
yers includ
FCI) and tization, est
und 13 yea
control and
er two con
e of the N
ting of see
ame exten
ops. India
ently, the
NationalSeed
g Indian
Corn share
psinte
dia has siz
e the Nati
he thirteenablished in
rs. Its role
extension
secutive pl
C in the In
s of high
ded to veg
is the first
ybrid seed
Associationof
armers and
s comprise
rmsof
Cott
Cor
Rice
Mill
Sun
Sorg
Sud
Page|
able public
onal Seed
State Seed1963, and
extended t
activities in
an periods
dian States
ielding and
etables an
country t
industry i
India
comprise
19% of th
on
t
lower
hum
nGrass
,
.
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
6/18
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
7/18
Growt
Figure4:
The abopportu
Trend of
rowthTrend
ove graphnities for g
C
1
Key Field
fMajorField
shows throwth in th
otton
23
30
Grow
Crops in t
CropsinHybri
t the 3 mdays to c
4
thTren
2
e Hybrid
SeedMarket
ain hybridme.
Corn
5
65
8
dinHy
005 2008
Seed Mar
in000MT(for
field crop
ridFie
2013
et:
Corn&Rice),
s (in term
Rice
9
19
4
ldCrop
illionPackets
s of value
0
s
Page|
forCotton
has good
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
8/18
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
9/18
Page|9
companies. Alliances are becoming increasingly important in seed industry to bridge the gap
between the field experience and emerging technologies.
It is this symbiotic relationship that fuels an increasing number of opportunities. It also brings
opportunities to operate collaborative R&D programmes in biotech, especially, in genetically
modified field trials. As farmers face a limited choice of new seed traits, seed companies are
looking forward to developing projects that are required to supplement their product pipelines.
Biotech leadership of the country will certainly play a vital role to bridge the gap in the days to
come.
Understanding The Market Dynamics
The proliferation of product choices, information sources, distribution channels and marketing
platforms has made the market a complex place for the buyers as well as the sellers. In the highlycompetitive seed market it is imperative for a company to focus on customer psyche to provide
the right product to the right person.
Figure1:CustomerBuyingProcess.The diagram illustrates how the potential customers make their choices and falls into the basket
of different companies. Thus, a seed company has to target its customers in the proper way so
that more and more customers fall into its basket.
In this context two cases have been discussed in detail.
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
10/18
Page|10
A Case of Hybrid Rice:
The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) had started a mission mode policy on
hybrid rice in December 1989, with the technical support of the International Rice Research
Institute (IRRI). Since then the hybrid rice market in India has gone a long way.
However the rate of adoption of hybrid rice was far below than what was expected. Hybrid rice
was accepted in small pockets of the country and mass production of hybrid rice is still not
prevalent. Under such circumstances, it becomes imperative for any company dealing in the
hybrid seed industry to find out the customer preferences and to understand the reasons for poor
adoption of hybrids in many regions of the country.
Speaking about buying behaviour: It must be mentioned at the onset that the competitor of a
hybrid rice brand is not another brand of hybrid rice! At the present market scenario, the maincompetitor of hybrid rice is other OPVs. Thus companies marketing hybrids must understand
why the farmers are not going for hybrids rather than inbred and, of course, to tackle these issues
in favour of the comapny.
In several studies, the most prominent reason cited by the farmers for not cultivating hybrid rice
is poor cooking quality. However there are several regions where the awareness about hybrids is
also very poor. The farmers complain that the hybrid rice after cooking is sticky and this is a
negative attribute among Indian rice consumers. Some farmers also complain about higher
disease and pest incidence in hybrids. Therefore the market is in demand of a disease resistant
hybrid capable of providing an yield advantage over OPVs.
The question now arises that which are the markets that a hybrid rice company should target?
Since cooking quality is not acceptable, the best segment would be enterprising farmers whose
staple diet is not rice. Thus, Punjab, Haryana, parts of Chattisgarh and Western UP would be
good markets. For understanding the districts which would emerge as high adopters of hybrid
paddy, a survey may be made to estimate the yield advantage and profit advantage of hybrid rice
over the popular inbreds of the region. Wherever the advantages of growing hybrids are higher,
the rate of adoption is expected to be higher. These districts may be targeted by the companies.
Hybrid paddy growers generally do not consume the rice they produce. They grow hybrids to geta yield advantage and by selling a larger volume, they expect to get a profit advantage over
OPVs. Thus a farmer is expected to switch over to hybrid paddy if he is ensured of a good price
for hybrid paddy. So areas with a price premium for hybrid paddy may be targeted.
The market is still riddled with subcontracted buying behavior of the customers. Thus push
strategy remains as the key factor to promote sales. However the market is slowly moving in a
direction of brand awareness. Thus the right mix of push and pull strategy would work well.
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
11/18
Extrav
pheno
The W
The hy
quality
is able
this sec
the pro
A Case
After t
cotton.
Figure6:BGI: T
feeding
armige
BG II:
increas
bollwo
fall arm
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
gant expe
enal sales.
y Forward:
rid rice se
parameters
to bring ab
tor. Howev
uct and co
of Hybrid
e advent
oundationofis cotton p
damage
a), pink b
This cotto
d control
m) compar
y worm) a
0.3
2002
diture on
d market i
for large s
out a techn
er till this
nsolidation
Cotton:
f Bt techn
Biotechnologyroduces th
by lepidop
llworm (P
produces
f major in
ed to BGI.
d sucking
1.1 7
2003 2
%
promotion
s highly in
ale cultiva
ological br
roduct co
of market
ology, Indi
AwarenessanCry1Ac in
teran inse
ctinophora
both Cry1
sect pest o
With addit
insect pest.
.3
14.
04 200
AreaU
would on
need of a p
ion of hyb
eakthrough
es up, the
hare.
a experien
dEducationsect contro
t such as
gossypiela
c and Cry
cotton (to
ional contr
41.5
2006
nderBt
ly increas
roduct that
ids all ove
in this res
key to succ
ced a phen
l protein. It
American
), and toba
2Ab2 prot
acco bud
l of secon
66
2007
Cotton
costs an
would sati
the countr
pect would
ess would
omenal gr
provide ef
cotton b
co bud wo
in which
orm, pink
ary lepido
%Area
might n
fy the desi
y. The com
emerge as
e proper p
wth of ar
ective prot
llworm (
rm (Earias
rovide equ
bollworm,
pteran inse
UnderBtCott
Page|11
t result in
ed cookin
pany which
a leader in
acement o
a under B
ection fro
elicoverp
spp.),
ivalent an
and cotto
t (beet an
on
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
12/18
Page|12
Talking about market dynamics, there is a change in buying behavior in hybrid cotton farmers
that is becoming popular. Instead of purchasing seeds on the advice of the dealers, the farmers
are increasingly becoming brand aware. This means that the companies must try to strengthentheir brands as much as possible in the days to come rather than only depending on dealers
push.
The level of involvement of the farmer in the purchase of agriculture input (in our case hybrid
cotton ) is a high involvement one as the farmer tries to convience and confirm himself that the
brand he is buying is the best available in the market and the most profitable one in terms of all
the attributes he is looking for.
According to a study, 80-85 % of farmers depend on their prior experiences as well as the advice
of fellow farmers. 10 % on advice of dealers and 5-10 % on company persons etc. It is at this
time that who ever is able to convince the farmer wins his confidence and the farmer prefers the
variety told by him.
It was also seen that there is a shift of farmers from BG-1 to BG-2 cotton.
Year BG I BG II
2008-09 70% 30%2009-10 60% 40%
Way Forward:
Thus it would be prudent for a company to emphasise on BG-2 in the days to come as greater
number of farmers would use it. It would be more important to promote the brand of seed they
are marketing than depend on push strategy only.
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
13/18
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
14/18
Page|14
trading terms. This encourages dealers to stock their products and give them prominence. If
farmers go to buy seed, and are undecided about the variety, the dealer will recommend seed
from the most profitable supply source.
Sales Promotion
It is the term given to describe a variety of techniques designed to encourage customers to buy.
They complement advertising and other promotional activities. They are tactical devices that
provide incentives to 'buy now', thus sales promotion is short-term (to achieve an immediate
effect) whereas advertising is a longer term communications process. The techniques used to
achieve these short-term effects can be divided into either selling to the market channel or sellingout of the marketing channel. There are two types of sales promotion activity:
1. Selling to the marketing channelThese are the techniques which, by providing incentives and support, enhance sales to the trade
and encourage the distributors and dealers to stock the product. Some examples follow.
Dealer 'loaders'. These are ways of encouraging dealers to build up their stocks in sufficient
time, so that inadequate supplies and last-minute transport problems are avoided. Examples are:
offering discounts on orders taken early and progressive, volume discounts on large orders(quantity discounts). These discounts can, of course, be passed on to the customer.
Point-of-sale materials. These are materials supplied by the seed company to the sale points to
support sales of their product range. They are used to display and attract attention to the product
range as well as to provide information. This form of sales support encourages the dealer to order
stocks. Examples of point-of-sale materials include colourful display boxes in which seed
packets are placed, particularly vegetable seeds, product information leaflets, seed catalogues
and audio-visual displays, such as slides with sound tracks or videos.
Dealer competitions. The larger seed companies can afford to offer significant prizes linked todealer sales' performance. It is also an established technique in the more developed countries to
hold dealer seminars in attractive locations. While it may not be realistic to expect companies in
developing economies to incur the high levels of expenditure necessary to organize dealer
seminars, some form of incentive scheme may be worth running. Overseas suppliers could also
be asked to support such schemes by inviting the 'dealer of the year' to visit the producing
country. A dealer will also value the status of seeing his name in print so press releases and
dealer names featured in catalogues and advertisements can be used.
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
15/18
Page|15
Dealer training. Training dealers in the use and benefits of the product is a vital form of support.
A dealer will attract customers and sell more if confident and knowledgeable about the product.
Training should also cover product care in store and stock rotation as well as retail presentation.
Credit. This again encourages higher stocking and can be used selectively to promote certain
product lines. Credit can be used as an incentive to dealers where companies have to compete for
shelf space.
Sale or return. This is particularly relevant for the stocking of new products as it provides an
element of risk-sharing. However, it can be costly to the supplying company. A return system is
used to promote preferential stocking but simply stocking the dealer on a sale or return basis
should be avoided as the dealer will have no commitment to sell. Such a system should always
provide an incentive to take stock. Thus, for example, returns could apply only to stock takenover and above the previous year's sales. There are, of course, quality considerations and
companies may prefer to collect unsold stock for secure storage and relabelling to avoid the
possibility of farmers complaining of poor germination in a subsequent year. This can be
provided as a service to the dealer with the product remaining the property of the dealer. It is
important that the supplying company protects its name and image at all times.
Promotional gifts. Small gifts (give-aways) can be given to dealers as added incentives. The
seed company's name can be promoted on pens, cigarette lighters and calendars. These serve the
purpose of keeping the company and its brand names in the dealer's mind. Small value items can
also be passed on to farmers when they purchase their seed. Larger value items may be given todealers as presents in return for orders for new products, achieving higher volumes or even for
displaying a company's seeds in front of its competitors' products. Many of these techniques may
only seem relevant to the more sophisticated and competitive market situations but marketing
managers should be aware of the techniques that are used to encourage dealers to stock and to
promote one product in preference to another.
2. Selling out of the marketing channelThese are the techniques which assist the retail trade in promoting and selling products to the
final consumer. Some examples follow.
Free samples. Dealers can give out samples of new varieties. The indiscriminate use of free
samples can be counterproductive, however, as the farmer may not achieve a good result and
blame the variety or may not use the sample as it was free.
Seed exchange. Seed can be exchanged for farmers' grain to overcome initial resistance to
buying and using improved seed. This is perhaps more of an extension practice which should be
organized by the seed company on a direct basis.
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
16/18
Page|16
Coupon offers. Refundable coupons can be used offering 'money off' the next purchase to
encourage repeat orders or purchases of other products in the company's range.
Price reductions. This will obviously be popular but the danger is that revenue will simply be
reduced without significantly increasing sales so the technique needs to be used selectively.
Competitions. Competitions only create interest if they capture the imagination, e.g. a yield
competition and membership to a 'yield club' for a certain achievement. They can be organized
on a village level or directed at a certain group, such as young farmers.
Premium offers. The offer of an extra product for a promotional price can be made. This could
be a joint promotion with a non-seed product or linked to seed of another species that could be
grown by the farmer.
Field demonstrations and group discussions. These are both very effective ways of promoting
seed products and supporting the local dealer. The demonstration must involve proper seed and
fertiliser usage, soil and water management practices, weed control and plans protection
measures and, if necessary, security measures.
It is important that, before embarking on promotional activities, the marketing manager is given
the necessary support within the supplying organization as well as among the distributors and
dealers. There is obviously no point in starting a promotion without ensuring that sufficient funds
and materials are available and that there is the necessary administrative organization.
3. Personal selling
While seed products may be well advertised and promoted, a high degree of personal selling and
service will always be required. Seed company staff and, where possible, dealers should always
be provided with adequate training and familiarization with the products they are selling and the
market they are selling into.
A good presentation of the company and its product range is important in making the sale. The
company should provide the necessary visual material that can be used in both informal one-to-
one and more formal group presentations. A ring binder with sequenced seed product leaflets and
photographs is a useful way of conducting a one-to-one presentation. A good seed catalogue is
also useful, especially for a product group with a large range.
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
17/18
Page|17
Striking The Right Mix
It has been seen that the credibility of field demonstrations has been highest as a promotional
tool. Since promotional activities involve a lot of cost on the company, striking the right mix of
the promotional activities is an imperative. The right mix is decided by the depth of awareness
required by the company among farmers and the budget allocated. It differs from place to place
and between small and large farmers as well. The promotional strategy also depends on the
competitors strategy as well as the distribution channel that the company is using. Marketing
research in this respect may be conducted to get the right mix of promotional activities for a
particular region.
Way Forward
In the last few years, the seed industry has seen a substantial number of mergers and acquisitions
and an increase in vertical and horizontal integration. The structural changes underway in the
seed industry are due to a number of factors. Some of these factors are common to all industries
and have no specific link to biotechnology. For instance, the mergers and acquisitions in the seed
industry are at least in part a result of the need to consolidate costs and rationalize industry
capacity, a desire by the management of the firms involved to extend their sphere of influence,
and a wish by some firms to pre-empt other firms from taking over valuable assets.
The horizontal mergers and acquisitions that have occurred in the seed industry can also be
linked to R&D costs, economies of scale and scope created by intellectual property rights, and to
regulatory costs. The increased vertical linkages in the industry are connected to the product
complementarity that is increasingly present between seed and chemical products, as well as to
the difficulty in enforcing certain types of intellectual property. In other cases, the rise of better-
defined intellectual property rights has been a factor in the joint ventures and strategic alliances
that have occurred.
The pricing behaviour of the large firms in the seed industry appears to be strategic in nature,
with pricing being influenced by competition from other products and the value created by their
products. There is substantial evidence of price discrimination, whether it is in the form of
Technology Use Agreements, differential pricing, or tied sales. The key impact of this strategic
pricing is not on the total economic surplus created as a result of R&D, but rather on the
distribution of this surplus Structure, strategic pricing and the distributional impacts of this
pricing are important considerations of public policy. In particular, because a great deal of the
structural issues in the industry are linked to intellectual property rights, the question arises as to
the proper degree of protection that should be provided through IPRs. Intellectual property rights
are granted to companies and individuals as an explicit element of public policy. They are
specifically designed to encourage innovation and to provide incentives for the development and
-
8/7/2019 Seed Industry
18/18
Page|18
diffusion of new products and technologies. The empirical evidence suggests that the
establishment and strengthening of property rights in agriculture has led to an increase in private
investment in agricultural research. Intellectual property rights also provide benefits by creatingeconomies of scale and scope, which in turn mean lower costs for those firms that can expand
production. At the same time, IPRs can be linked to higher concentration, which in turn lead to
deviations from marginal cost and average cost pricing. Intellectual property rights thus represent
a trade-off between the potential negative effects of market power and the benefits from greater
R&D.