school grade coming in 2018

IRN: 016006 of 24Printed on January 3, 2018

2016 - 2017 Report Card for

Hiawatha Elementary School

DISTRICT GRADE2018Coming in

SCHOOL GRADE

Achievement

Performance Index

Indicators MetF

DCOMPONENT GRADE Progress

Value Added

Students with Disabilities.....................................................................................

Lowest 20% in Achievement..............................................................................

BCOMPONENT GRADE

The Achievement component represents the numberof students who passed the state tests and how wellthey performed on them.

The Progress component looks closely at thegrowth that all students are making based ontheir past performances.

D

8.3%.............................................................................................................

67.6%.............................................................................................. Overall...................................................................................................................

Gifted...................................................................................................................

ANRCB

Gap Closing

Annual Measurable Objectives3.4%..........................................................................................................................

F

FCOMPONENT GRADE Graduation Rate

Graduation Ratesof students graduated in 4 years...................................................................................NRof students graduated in 5 years.................................................................................NR

Not Rated

COMPONENT GRADEThe Gap Closing component shows how well schoolsare meeting the performance expectations for ourmost vulnerable populations of students in Englishlanguage arts, math and graduation.

The Graduation Rate component looks at thepercent of students who are successfully finishinghigh school with a diploma in four or five years.

NRNRThis school is not evaluated for graduation rate because there are not

enough students in the graduating class.

K-3 Literacy

CCOMPONENT GRADE Prepared for Success

Not Rated

COMPONENT GRADEThe K-3 Literacy component looks at how successfulthe school is at getting struggling readers on track toproficiency in third grade and beyond.

Whether training in a technical field or preparingfor work or college, the Prepared for Successcomponent looks at how well prepared Ohio’sstudents are for all future opportunities.

K-3 Literacy Improvement45.3%...........................................................................................................................C


2016 - 2017 Report Card for Hiawatha Elementary School

AchievementThe Achievement component represents the number of studentswho passed the state tests and how well they performed onthem.

DCOMPONENT GRADE

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2.2 2.84.7

6.2 6.3

9.8 9.5

16.1 13.3 12.9

35.0

39.5

33.6

29.4

23.5

27.6

23.1

20.9

20.4

26.7

19.317.0

5.9

10.811.8

0.2

94.0 92.0

81.2 80.4 81.2

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

LimitedPerformance Index

Points

BasicPerformance Index

Points

ProficientPerformance Index

Points

AcceleratedPerformance Index

Points

AdvancedPerformance Index

Points

Advanced PlusPerformance Index

Points

===

0.01.3xxx

Advanced PlusAdvanced

AcceleratedProficient

BasicLimited

Untested

1.21.11.00.60.30.0

9.824.323.521.520.90.0

11.826.723.512.96.30.0

81.2xxxx

====

0.0

0

20

40 60

80

100

DGRADE Performance Index

The Performance Index measures the test results of every student, not just those whoscore proficient or higher. There are six levels on the index and districts receive pointsfor every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the morethe points awarded in the district's index. This rewards schools and districts forimproving the performance of all students, regardless of achievement level.

67.6%

Performance Index

81.2 of a possible 120.0

A = 90.0 - 100.0%B = 80.0 - 89.9%C = 70.0 - 79.9%D = 50.0 - 69.9%F = 0.0 - 49.9%

9.8

24.3

23.5

20.9

21.5Advanced PlusAdvancedAcceleratedProficientLimitedBasicUntested

AchievementLevel

Pct ofStudents

Points forthis Level

PointsReceived

Performance Index Trend



FGRADE Indicators Met

Indicators Met measures the percent of students who have passed state tests.It also includes the gifted indicator. Test results are reported for each studentin a grade and subject. The passage rate for each indicator is 80%.

Indicators Met %

0

20

40 60

80

100

8.3%1 out of 12

A =B =C =D =F =

90.0 - 100.0%80.0 - 89.9%70.0 - 79.9%50.0 - 69.9%0.0 - 49.9%

6th Grade

7th Grade

English Language Arts

Mathematics

Social Studies

English Language ArtsMathematics

59.2%

63.3%

71.4%

NC NCNC NC

No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filterexcludes all data.

3rd Grade

4th Grade

5th Grade


Mathematics


Mathematics

Social Studies


Mathematics

Science

50.9%

50.0%

63.6%

75.0%

84.1%

46.9%

25.0%

52.1%

This school does not haveenough Ohio Graduation

Test results to display thistable.

Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 High School

GIFTED INDICATOR



Achievement Levels by Grade Proficient Percent Trend by Grade

3rd Grade

48%

52%

56%

60%

64%

68%

72%

50.9% 50.0%

60.2%62.4%63.8%

70.6%

Reading Mathematics

School District State Average

30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Reading Mathematics

3rd Grade

4th Grade

60%64%68%72%76%80%84%88%

63.6%

75.0%

84.1%

62.8%

72.6%

78.1%

62.8%

72.4%

77.5%

Reading Mathematics Social Studies


50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017


4th Grade

5th Grade

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

46.9%

25.0%

52.1%

64.5%58.8%

70.4%67.7%61.6%

68.3%

Reading Mathematics Science


20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017


5th Grade

6th Grade 6th Grade



58%60%62%64%66%68%70%72%74%

59.2%

63.3%

71.4%

59.3%

63.1%

68.5%

60.2% 60.2%

64.0%



50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017


8th Grade

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

47.6%

63.0%70.6%

50.3% 54.9%65.8%



No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filterexcludes all data.

8th Grade

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

74.5% 75.0%

0.0%

57.5%

48.1%44.2%

48.5%

0.0% 0.0%

70.4%72.1% 68.7%

19.1%

58.3%

55.2%

45.3%

42.9%38.1%

31.3%

61.1%

Government History PhysicalScience

English I English II Algebra I Geometry Math I Math II Biology


90%

92%

94%

96%

98%

100%

2016

HistoryProficiency % Trend

English IProficiency % Trend

English IIProficiency % Trend

Algebra IProficiency % Trend

GeometryProficiency % Trend

BiologyProficiency % Trend

High School High School



Gifted StudentsThe Gifted Students data and Indicator highlight the opportunities forand performance of gifted students. The dashboard answers severalquestions: How many students are identified as gifted and in what

categories? How many of those students are receiving gifted services?How well are those gifted students performing? The Gifted Indicator

measures whether opportunity and performance expectations are beingmet for gifted students.

INDICATOR

Not Met

The Gifted Indicator is derived from three components: Gifted Value Added grade, thePerformance Index for gifted students, and a Gifted Inputs score.

Gifted Value Added

Schools must earn a Gifted Value Added grade of Cor better to meet the Gifted Value Added

component.

Gifted Performance Index

Schools with at least 10 unique students in theGifted Performance Index calculation must score117.0 or better to meet the Gifted Performance

Index component.

Gifted Inputs

Points are earned based on identification andservices provided to gifted students. Schools must

earn 80 or more points out of a possible 100 tomeet the Gifted Inputs component.

Gifted Indicator Final Result

The Gifted Indicator is Met if none of the threecomponents are Not Met. Gifted Inputs alone

cannot determine the Gifted Indicator, however; ifboth the Value Added and Performance Index

components are NC, then the Gifted Indicator is alsoNC.

INDICATOR

Not Met

Total Points:Gifted Inputs Met?:

37.0

Not Met

Performance Index: 112.222

Not MetPerformance Index Met?:

Value Added Grade:Value Added Met?:

NRNC

Overview Performance Index

93.5%112.222 of a possible 120.0

A = 90.0 - 100.0%B = 80.0 - 89.9%C = 70.0 - 79.9%D =50.0 - 69.9%F = 0.0 - 49.9%

AchievementLevel

Pct ofStudents

Points forthis Level

PointsReceived

Advanced Plus 0.0 x 1.3 = 0.0Advanced 42.2 x 1.2 = 50.7

Accelerated 46.7 x 1.1 = 51.3Proficient 8.9 x 1.0 = 8.9

Basic 2.2 x 0.6 = 1.3Limited 0.0 0.0x 0.3 =

Untested 0.0 x 0.0 = 0.0112.222

The Performance Index calculation for gifted students. Only teststaken by students identified as gifted in that subject (e.g. gifted in

Math and taking the Math test), or taken by students identified withSuper Cognitive abilities regardless of test subject are included.

0

20

40 60

80

100

42.2

46.7

8.92.2

Advanced PlusAdvancedAccelaratedProficientLimitedBasicUntested



Gifted IndicatorThe Gifted Inputs calculation assigns points based on the percentage of students identified and served in eight categories (factors). The points earned for each category are totaled to determine the final Met/Not Met

determination for the Gifted Input component.

Reading, Math, Science, Social Studies, and Superior Cognitive Abilities Visual/Performing Arts and Creative Thinking

2.0%

6.9%

91.1%

0.3%99.7%

Disadvantaged Students Minority Students

0.9%

6.1%

93.0%

0.9%

7.4%

91.7%

Receiving Gifted Services Identified as Gifted, butnot receiving services

Not Identified as Gifted



Identification and Receiving Services

Grades K-3

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

3.6%

5.3% 5.3%

7.1%

10.7%

5.3%

Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive

Identified Receiving Services

Grades 4-8

0.0%1.0%

2.0%3.0%

4.0%5.0%

6.0%7.0%

8.0%9.0%

4.1%3.3%

8.1%

6.0%5.4%

0.7%

2.8%

MathReading

ScienceSocial Studies

Superior CognitiveVisual and Performing Arts


Grades 9-12

No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.

All Grades

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

4.0% 3.8%

7.3%

6.3%6.9%

0.5%

3.5%

MathReading

ScienceSocial Studies

Superior CognitiveVisual and Performing Arts


This chart cannot be displayed because therewere not enough students to evaluate.

These charts show the percentage of enrolled students that are identified as gifted and that are receiving gifted services.



Identified and Receiving Services

Grades K-3

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

50.0%

Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive

Grades 4-8

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

69.6%

0.0%

Math Reading Science Social Studies

Superior Cognitive Visual and PerformingArts

Grades 9-12


This chart cannot be displayed because therewere not enough students to evaluate.

All Grades

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

50.0%

0.0%

Math Reading Science Social Studies

Superior Cognitive Visual and PerformingArts

These charts show, of the students identified as gifted, the percentage of students receiving gifted services.



ProgressThe Progress component looks closely at the growth that all studentsare making based on their past performances.

BCOMPONENT GRADE

AGRADE Overall

NRGRADE Gifted Students

CGRADE Students with Disabilities

BGRADE Students in the Lowest 20% in Achievement

This measures the progress for all students in math, ELA, science andsocial studies using tests in grades 4-8 and some end-of-course exams.

This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading,math, science, social studies and/or superior cognitive ability.

This measures the progress for students with disabilities.

This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 20%statewide in reading, math, science or social studies achievement.

Test GradeProgress Score

EnglishLanguage Arts Mathematics Social Studies Science All Tests

All Grades

4th Grade

5th Grade

6th Grade

Yellow Dark Green Dark Green Red Dark Green

Light Green Dark Green Dark Green

Orange Red Red Red

Yellow Dark Green Dark Green Dark Green

These tables show the Progress scores by test grade and subject for students in grades 4-8 and some end-of-coursetests, and includes up to three years of data as available.

No data returned for this view. This might bebecause the applied filter excludes all data.

No data returned for this view. This might be becausethe applied filter excludes all data.High School English

Language Arts Value Addeddata is not available for this

school

High School Math Value Addeddata is not available for this

school

Red Students made less progress than expected – significant evidence

Students made less progress than expected – moderate evidenceOrange

Yellow Students made progress similar to the statewide expectation – evidence

Students made more progress than expected – moderate evidenceLight Green

Dark Green Students made more progress than expected – significant evidence

The Progress Component measures how groups of students made progress as compared to the statewideexpectation of growth. The expectation of growth is based on how students in the group performed, onaverage, compared to other students like them across the state

What do the colors mean?

Progress Details

NRGRADE High Mobility

For districts and schools with a mobility rate of 25% or higher, thismeasures the progress of a subset of students that have been in thedistrict for at least two years. This measure will not be included in theProgress component grade.



Progress vs. Performance Index

This bubble chart shows the relationship between each subgroup's Performance Index results (horizontalaxis) to the Value-Added letter grade (vertical axis). The size of the bubble represents the size of the

student subgroup.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

OverallStudents w/ DisabilitiesLowest 20%GiftedHigh SchoolHighly Mobile

A

B

C

D

F

Performance Index

Gra

de



Gap ClosingThe Gap Closing component shows how well schools are meeting theperformance expectations for our most vulnerable populations ofstudents in English language arts, math and graduation.

FCOMPONENT GRADE

FGRADE Annual Measurable Objectives

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of student groups to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achievesthat goal in reading, math and graduation – and emphasize any achievement gaps that exist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels.

The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 2017 AMO for ELA is 77.1%, for Math is 72%, and for Graduation Rate is 85.1%.

0 20 40 60 80 100

57.3

54.6

50.4

6.7

White All StudentsEcon Disadvantage Students w/ Disab...

AMO Points

3.4%

0

20

40 60

80

100

3

A = 90.0 - 100.0%B = 80.0 - 89.9%C = 70.0 - 79.9%D = 60.0 - 69.9%F = 0.0 - 59.9%

0 20 40 60 80 100

56.7

52.6

50.5

13.3

White All StudentsEcon Disadvantage Students w/ Disa...

No data returned for this view. This might be becausethe applied filter excludes all data.

Subgroups with fewer than 30 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs.

This school does not have an Annual MeasurableObjective for Graduation Rate because there were not

enough students to evaluate.

Graduation RateMathEnglish Language Arts



Graduation RateThe Graduation Rate component looks at the percent of students whoare successfully finishing high school with a diploma in four or fiveyears. Not Rated

COMPONENT GRADE

D =

B =

0

20

40

60

80

100

0.0

87.683.6

School DistrictState Average

4-Year Rate

0

20

40

60

80

100

0.0

89.185.6

School DistrictState Average

5-Year Rate

NRGRADE

4-Year Graduation RateThe 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2016 who graduated within four years, i.e. students whoentered the 9th grade in 2013 and graduated by 2016.

NRGRADE

5-Year Graduation RateThe 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2015 who graduated within five years, i.e. students whoentered the 9th grade in 2012 and graduated by 2016.

NR

NR

A = 93.0 - 100.0%89.0 - 92.9%

C = 84.0 - 88.9%79.0 - 83.9%

F = 0.0 - 78.9%

A = 95.0 - 100.0%B = 90.0 - 94.9%C = 85.0 - 89.9%D = 80.0 - 84.9%F = 0.0 - 79.9%

0

20

40 60

80

100

0

20

40 60

80

100

This school has not been assigneda grade for Graduation Rate

because there were not enoughstudents to evaluate.



Graduation Rate Trend


Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because thenecessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year.

The Graduation Rate graph thatwould appear in this space cannotbe displayed because there werenot enough students to evaluate.



K-3 LiteracyThe K-3 Literacy component looks at how successful the school is atgetting struggling readers on track to proficiency in third grade andbeyond.

CCOMPONENT GRADE

0

20

40 60

80

100

45.3

CGRADE

45.3%

K-3 LiteracyImprovement

Details of MeasureIn Your School...

A = 74.7 - 100.0%B = 49.3 - 74.6%C = 23.9 - 49.2%D = -1.5 - 23.8%F = <= -1.6%

34 StudentsMoved to On

Track - 0 RIMPDeductions

45.3%

75 StudentsStarted Off Track

RIMP = Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plan. Districts are required tocreate a RIMP for students not on track to be proficient in English Language Arts

by the end of 3rd grade.

54.7% 45.3%

Remained Off Track Moved to On Track

54.7% 45.3%

Remained Off Track Moved to On Track

35.5% 64.5%

Year 1

33.3% 66.7%

Year 2

100.0% 0.0%

Year 3

65.7% 34.3%

Year 4



Percentage On-Track in Reading Diagnostic

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

63.3%

73.5%

88.7%

28.6%

36.7%

26.5%

11.3%

71.4%

KindergartenDiagnostic

First GradeDiagnostic

Second GradeDiagnostic

Third GradeDiagnostic

On-TrackNotOn-Track

Third Grade Reading Guarantee

Ohio's Third Grade Reading Guarantee ensures that students are successful inreading before moving on to fourth grade. Schools must provide supports forstruggling readers in early grades. If a child appears to be falling behind in reading,the school will immediately start a Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plan. Theprogram ensures that every struggling reader gets the support he or she needs tolearn and achieve.

Students have multiple opportunities to meet promotion requirements includingmeeting a minimum promotion score on the third grade state reading tests given inthe fall and spring. Students have an additional opportunity to take the stateassessment in the summer, as well as a district-determined alternative assessment.

The Parent Roadmap is available to help parents understand how the Third GradeReading Guarantee applies to your child.

How many third graders met the Third Grade ReadingGuarantee requirements for promotion to 4th grade?

87.5%

How many third graders scored proficient on the state Readingtest? 50.9%This chart shows the overall percentage of students that were on-track/not-on-track for each

grade level reading diagnostic in 2016-2017.



Prepared for SuccessWhether training in a technical field or preparing for work or college,the Prepared for Success component looks at how well prepared Ohio’sstudents are for all future opportunities. Not Rated

COMPONENT GRADE

How Prepared were Your 2015 and 2016 Graduating Classes?

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

ACT: Participation

ACT: Remediation Free

SAT: Participation

SAT: Remediation Free

Honors Diploma

Industry-RecognizedCredential

Advanced Placement:Participation

AP: Exam Score of 3 orBetter

Dual Enrollment Credit

InternationalBaccalaureate

IB: Exam Score of 4 orBetter

0.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

0.0%

This data cannot be shown becausethere are not enough students in thegraduating class of 2016 to evaluate.

Note: These data represent students in the 4-year and 5-year graduation rates, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 2012 and 2013.

Number of students that earned aremediation free score on all parts of

the ACT or SAT, earned an honorsdiploma, and/or earned an industry-

recognized credential

The number of "bonus" students thatcount an additional 0.3 bonus points

each, because they did the aboveand also earned a 3 or higher on at

least one AP exam; earned a 4 orhigher on at least one IB exam;

and/or earned at least three collegecredits before leaving high school

Number ofStudents

PointValue

PointsEarne

d

0 0.0

0 0.0

1

0.3

Total Points:

Graduation Cohort:

Percentage:

0.0

0

Not Rated

COMPONENT GRADE

90.0% - 100.0%70.0% - 89.9%45.0% - 69.9%25.0% - 44.9%

A =B =C =D =

0.0% - 24.9%F =

0%

20%

40% 60%

80%

100%

This data cannot be shown because there are not enoughstudents in the graduating class of 2016 to evaluate.



100.0%

100.0%

Note: These data represent students in the 4-year and 5-year graduation rates, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 2012 and 2013.

Districts and schools have long-term impacts on student outcomes. The Prepared forSuccess component provides information on how schools prepare students for differentpathways of college and career success. It also provides insights on how those students

do once they leave high school. What happens beyond the diploma is an importantindicator of how well schools are preparing students.

The University System of Ohio provides district reports on enrollment and remediation ofhigh school graduates attending in-state, public colleges and universities.

What Percentage of the 2014 GraduatingClass Entered College within Two Years? NC

What Percentage of the 2010 GraduatingClass Graduated from College within Six

Years of Leaving High School?NC

Outcomes after High School Graduation

This graph is not displayedbecause the result is Not

Calculated.

This graph is not displayedbecause the result is Not

Calculated.

https://www.ohiohighered.org/data-reports/college-readiness



Principal:Address:

Albert F. Bernhardt3020 Photos DrToledo OH 43613-2435

Directory information current as of the 2016-2017 Report Card publication date.

Phone: (419) 473-8268

Your School's Students

AverageDaily

Enrollment:

364

Enrollment by Subgroup

Am. Indian / Alaskan Native

Asian or Pacific Islander

Black, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic

Multiracial

White, Non-Hispanic

Students with Disabilities

Economically Disadvantaged

Limited English Proficiency

Migrant

Enrollment # Enrollment %

NC

NC

7.9%29

10.9%40

9.7%35

70.3%256

15.4%56

58.6%214

NC

NC

NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group

Number ofLimited English

ProficiencyStudents

Excluded fromAccountabilityCalculations:

--0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

7.9%10.9% 9.7%

70.3%

15.4%

58.6%

American Indian orAlaska...

Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic

Students withDisabilities

Economic Disadvantage Limited EnglishProficiency

MigrantState and federal law require an annual assessment of Limited English Proficient (LEP) students to measuretheir English language proficiency. The Ohio English Language Proficiency Assessment (OELPA) is theassessment used in Ohio to gauge LEP students' growth in learning English. For information about yourdistrict's OELPA results, see the Department of Education's web site at http://education.ohio.gov.



Attendance Rate

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

95.5% 92.9%95.5%

94.5%95.9%

95.0%95.0%

95.2%95.8%

All Students American Indian orAlaska...


Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial

White, Non-Hispanic Students withDisabilities

Economic Disadvantage

Limited EnglishProficiency

Migrant Male

Female

Attendance Rate is not shown if enrollment is less than 10.

ChronicAbsenteeism

Rate:

8.6%


Female

Male

Migrant


Economic Disadvantage


White, Non-Hispanic

Multiracial

Hispanic

Black, Non-Hispanic



All Students 95.5%

NC

NC

92.9%

95.5%

94.5%

95.9%

95.0%

95.0%

NC

NC

95.2%

95.8%



All Students



Black, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic

Multiracial

White, Non-Hispanic


Economically Disadvantaged


Migrant


Student Mobility %

0.8%

NC

NC

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

1.1%

0.0%

1.3%

NC

NC

Mobility Rates by Subgroup

0%

0%

0%

1%

1%

1%

1%

1%

0.8%

0.0%

1.3%

0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

1.1%

All Students American Indian orAlaska...


Black, Non-Hispanic Economic Disadvantage Hispanic

Limited EnglishProficiency

Migrant Multiracial

Students withDisabilities

White, Non-Hispanic

This chart shows the percentage of students who, because they moved into or outof the district, did not spend a majority of the school year within the district.



Your School's Teachers

Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor's Degree

Percentage of teachers with at least a Master's DegreePercentage of core academic subject and elementaryclasses not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

Percentage of core academic subject and elementaryclasses taught by properly certified teachersPercentage of core academic subject elementary andsecondary classes taught by teachers with temporary,conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure

Your School Your District

59.9

100

--

--

--

--

--

A district's high-poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile basedon the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile or in neither quartile.


Your School's Poverty Status: Medium-High

100.0

0

0

Lead or Senior Teachers: 0.0

Number of Teachers by Program Area

0.0

Special Education Teachers 4.0

General Education Teachers 13.0

Gifted Intervention Specialists 0.0

Career-Technical Teachers 1.0

Fine Arts Teachers 0.6

Music Teachers 0.8

Physical Education Teachers 0.7

ELL Specialists 0.0

Teacher Aides 3.0 7.3

#

State Avgper 1000Students

46.8

2.3

10.9

0.6

3.0

2.5

2.8

0.3



Fine Arts Courses OfferedNo data returned for this view. Thismight be because the applied filterexcludes all data.

No Fine Artscourses offered by

this school.

Moderate Success

52.6%

36.8%

10.5%

Accomplished Skilled DevelopingIneffective Not Complete

Teacher Evaluations

Wellness and Physical Education

The extent to which students are successful inmeeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's

physical education standards

Compliance with the federalrequirement for implementing a

local wellness policy

Elected toadminister BMI

screening

Participation inPhysical Activity

Pilot Program



Financial Data

These measures answer several questions about spending and performance. How much is spent on Classroominstruction? How much, on average, is spent on each student? What is the source of the revenue? How do thesemeasures compare to other districts and schools?

Comparison Group: No Comparison Group

Classroom Spending Data

77.6%

22.4%

School

70.0%

22.4%

What percent of funds are spenton classroom instruction? 77.6%

District State

67.6%

32.4%

Classroom Instruction Non-Classroom Instruction

$0 $4,000 $8,000 $12,000

$6,299

$6,181

$1,815

$2,968

School

State

Operating Spending per Pupil

School State

$8,114 $9,149

$6,299 $6,181

$1,815 $2,968

Classroom Instruction

Non-Classroom Spending

Spending per Pupil Data

school grade coming in 2018

Documents