report to the hearing officer - san diego...monitoring program was recommended by the consulting...

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO

REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER

HEARING DATE: August 26,2015 REPORT NO. H0-15-100

ATTENTION:

SUBJECT:

LOCATION:

APPLICANT:

OWNER:

SUMMARY

Hearing Officer

ALTMAN RESIDENCE; PROJECT NUMBER: 353040 PROCESS THREE

9696 La Jolla Farms Road

Jon Dominy, Domus Studio Architecture

Altman Family Trust (Attachment 14)

Issue: Should the Hearing Officer approve an application to modify an existing singledwelling unit residence located at 9696 La Jolla Farms Road in the La Jolla Community Planning Area?

Staff Recommendations:

1. ADOPT Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 353040, and ADOPT the Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program;

2. APPROVE Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 1236014, and;

3. APPROVE Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 1236015.

Community Planning Group Recommendation: On May 7, 2015, the La Jolla Community Planning Association voted 15-0-1 to recommend approval of this project. (Attachment 13).

Environmental Review: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 353040 has been prepared for the project in accordance with the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which addresses potential impacts to Paleontological Resources and Historic Resources (Archaeology). A Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP) will be implemented with this project, which will reduce the potential impacts to below a level of significance.

of4

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Altman Residence is an application for a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) and Site Development Permit (SDP), Process Three. The site is developed with an existing 24,219 squarefoot single-dwelling unit residence which will be modified as part of this project. The project is located at 9696 La Jolla Farms Road, to the east ofthe Pacific Ocean. The property is separated from the beach by coastal bluffs/cliffs with an elevation change of 340 feet from sea level. The project is located in the RS-1-2 zone of the La Jolla Community Plan and Local Coastal Program. The property is surrounded by similarly sized residential development to the south, east, and north. Open space consisting of coastal bluffs, the beach, and the Pacific Ocean is to the west. (Attachments 1, 2, and 3)

The 3 .82-acre site is located within the Coastal Height Limitation Overlay Zone, the Coastal Overlay Zone (Appealable Area), the first public roadway, the Parking Impact Overlay Zone (Beach and Campus Impact Areas), and the Residential Tandem Parking Overlay Zone, and the La Jolla Community Plan and Local Coastal Program Area. As a component of the proposed project, the residence incorporates a roof-mounted photovoltaic system consisting of solar panels sufficient to generate at least 50% of the project's projected energy consumption, in conformance with the criteria of the Affordable/In-Fill Housing and Sustainable Buildings Expedite Program.

The existing development on site was permitted with Coastal Development Permit/Sensitive Coastal Resource Permit No. 91-0270 and a Substantial Conformance Review under Project Number 63365. The current project proposes to demolish a 1,286 square-foot maintenance/security building and construct a 1,026 square-foot home gym and 1,164 squarefoot home lounge. This will bring the total residence square-footage to 25,123 square-feet. The project also includes construction of a proposed 6,608 square-foot guest unit, which will result in a total building square-footage of 31,731 square-feet.

The current application requires an amendment to Coastal Development Permit/Sensitive Coastal Resource Permit No. 91-0270. As the project is located within the Coastal Pennit Overlay Zone -Appealable Area, the CDP is a Process Three approval. In addition, the project site includes environmentally sensitive land (ESL) consisting ofMulti-Habitat Planning Area (MHPA) land, coastal bluffs, and sensitive biological resources. An SDP is required due to the presence ofESL.

The construction activity associated with the proposed modifications to the existing development on-site occurs primarily to the east of the existing structures, with the exception of an addition to the southern portion of the residence. As a result, the proposed construction activity is separated from on-site ESL by existing buildings and improvements on site. The proposed development occurs in portions of the property that have been previously disturbed. Therefore, ESL will not be negatively affected by this project. A condition of approval requires that a Covenant of Easement be applied to the western portion of the property, which includes portions of ESL and MHP A. Additionally, to enhance and protect views to the ocean from the public right-of-way, a 1 0-foot wide view corridor easement is required of the project, and is proposed near the northern property line.

- 2-

The La Jolla Community Plan designates this site for very low density residential development, with a maximum density of0-5 dwelling units per acre (du/acre). The proposed project is at 0.26 dwelling units per acre and is consistent with the designated use and density identified by the La Jolla Community Plan. No deviations are requested as part of this project. The project complies with the RS-1-2 zone development regulations of the Land Development Code. In addition, the project is located within the Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone (Proposition "D") and does not exceed the 30-foot height limit.

Environmental Analysis: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 353040 has been prepared for this project in accordance with the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which addresses potential impacts to Paleontological Resources and Historic Resources (Archaeology). A Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP) will be implemented with this project, which will reduce the potential impacts of the project to below a level of significance.

As outlined in the Cultural Resources section of the MND, the project site is located within close proximity to recorded archeological sites as identified on the City of San Diego's Historical Resources Sensitivity Map. As such, an archaeological survey was conducted as part of this project. While no cultural resources were identified during the survey, an archaeological monitoring program was recommended by the consulting archaeologist, due to the possibility of buried or otherwise masked prehistoric archaeological features beneath the existing structure proposed for removal. The MMRP would be implemented to reduce impacts related to Historic Resources (archaeology) to below a level of significance.

CONCLUSION Staff has reviewed the application for the Coastal Development Permit and Site Development Permit and determined that the project is consistent with the applicable Site Development Permit Regulations, Coastal Development Permit Regulations, the La Jolla Community Plan and Local Coastal Program, and the Land Development Code. Staff recommends that the Hearing Officer approve this project.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 1236014 and Site Development Permit No. 1236015, with modifications.

2. Deny Coastal Development Permit No. 1236014 and Site Development Permit No. 123 6015, if the findings required to approve the project cannot be affirmed.

Respectfully submitted,

Alex Hempton, AICP Development Project Manager

- 3 -

Attachments:

1. Aerial Photo 2. Location Map 3. Community Plan Land Use Map 4. Zoning Map 5. Coastal Map 6. Data Sheet 7. Draft Permit Resolution with Findings 8. Draft Pennit with Conditions 9. Notice- Hearing Officer 10. Project Chronology 11. Draft MND Resolution 12. Photo Survey 13. Community Planning Group Recommendation 14. Ownership Disclosure Statement 15. Prior Pennits 16. Project Plans (11 x 17, plus full-size for Hearing Officer)

- 4-

0 -~

Aerial Photo Altman Residence - 353040 9696 La Jolla Farms Road

North

w

LJ,..,.,...,v , ....... , ..... ........... ....

Rady School of ~ Management

Salk Institute Rd lean or Roosevelt Collegl!

~ g ()

iii" r; L.

t:~-0 !?:: b'" 1.> ~ Estancra La Jolla ..,

{j-~' Holl?l 2. Spa

iiJ Pangea Dr

z d ~ II> '< "0 5 '

:; <n 3 n.r o'

R!IIAAC Arena •

if School of !ntemational S ~ Relations and Pacif1c .•

~ uc San D1ego :o ~ (UCSDl Extension 0. ~

Thurqood Marshall College

1\•l uir College Dr Geisel Library 11

La Jolla Farms Rd

Location Map Altman Residence - 353040 9696 La Jolla Farms Road

Muir Ln

~

Jol1n Muir College Scholars~

• Muir Field

~

Revelle Col leg" 100

.,... .__ _ ___.

t:'

~ < :< Q)

7<

s ..::. ro (i)

Q

• warren Mal/ canyorwic"

and F

"$1

Untve1sity of california san DieQo

~upenus ln ~ (II <11

'b S•xt11 • ~ Pes1der

Gilman Dr

+ Stuart Collection ~ ,

North

w

)> -f

~ 0 I s: m z -f I\.)

ATTACHMENT 3

legend f ] Very Low Density Residential (0-5 DUlAC)

Low Density Residential (5-9 DU/AC) 0 low Medium Residential (9-15 DU/AC)

- Medium Residential {15-30 DUlAC) - Medium High Res dentlal (30-45 DU/AC) - Commercial/Mixed Use

- Parks,Open Space -Schools - Cultural - Community Facilities

PACIFIC OCEAN

Designated as "Very Low Density Residential- 0-5 dwelling units per acre"

Land Use Map Altman Residence - 353040 9696 La Jolla Farms Road Page 1 of 1

North

\J ru

(Q CD

0 -.....lo.

RS-1-1

R-301263

02/28/2006

RS-1-2

R-301263

02/28/2006

RS-1-2

R-301263

02/28/2006

RS-1-2 Zone

Zoning Map Altman Residence - 353040 9696 La Jolla Farms Road

,... > ~ 0 ,... > ~ ;:o

ii ::u c

02/28/2006

-1-2

North w

)> _, ~ () I ~ m z _, ~

-u w

(.Q

CD

0 -.....lo.

Permit Overlay Zone -Appealable Area and within the

First Public Roadway

Coastal Map Altman Residence - 353040 9696 La Jolla Farms Road

North (Jl

w

ATTACHMENT 6

PROJECT DATA SHEET PROJECT NAME: Altman Residence

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demolish existing accessory structure and construct new accessory structure/addition to existing single dwelling-unit residence and guest unit.

COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: La Jolla

DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS: Coastal Development Permit (CDP) and Site Development Permit (SDP), Process 3

COMMUNITY PLAN LAND Residential - 0-5 dwelling units per acre USE DESIGNATION:

ZONING INFORMATION: ZONE: RS-1-2

HEIGHT LIMIT: 30-foot maximum height limit

LOT SIZE: 166,423 square-feet

FLOOR AREA RATIO: 0.45

FRONT SETBACK: 25'

SIDE SETBACK: 24'2" I 10'-0"

REAR SETBACK: 40' (Coastal Bluff)

PARKING: 6

LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE ADJACENT PROPERTIES: DESIGNATION &

ZONE

NORTH: Residential; RS-1-2 Residential

SOUTH: Residential; RS-1-2 Residential

EAST: Residential; RS-1-2 Residential

WEST: Residential; RS-1-1 Open Space

DEVIATIONS OR None. VARIANCES REQUESTED:

COMMUNITY PLANNING On May 7, 2015, the La Jolla Community Planning GROUP Association voted 15-0-1 to recommend approval of this RECOMMENDATION: project.

ATTACHMENT 7

HEARING OFFICER RESOLUTION NO. HO-:XXXX COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1236014

SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1236015 ALTMAN RESIDENCE, PROJECT NO. 353040 [MMRP]

AMENDMENT TO COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT/SENSITIVE COASTAL RESOURCE NO. 91-0270

WHEREAS, the ALTMAN FAMILY TRUST, Owners/Permittees, filed an application with the City of San Diego for a permit to demolish existing accessory structures and construct new accessory structures and a guest unit for an existing single-dwelling unit (as described in and by reference to the approved Exhibits "A" and corresponding conditions of approval for the associated Permit Nos. 1236014 and 1236015), on portions of a 3.82-acre site;

WHEREAS, the project site is located at 9696 La Jolla Farms Road in the RS-1-2 zone, within the Coastal Height Limitation Overlay Zone, the Coastal Overlay Zone (Appealable Area), the first public roadway, the Parking Impact Overlay Zone (Beach and Campus Impact Areas), the Residential Tandem Parking Overlay Zone, and the La Jolla Community Plan and Local Coastal Program Area;

WHEREAS, the project site is legally described as Lots 10 and 11 of La Jolla Farms subdivision, Map No. 3487;

WHEREAS, on August 26, 2015, the Hearing Officer of the City of San Diego considered Coastal Development Permit No. 1236014 and Site Development Permit No. 1236015 pursuant to the Land Development Code ofthe City of San Diego;

BE IT RESOLVED by the Hearing Officer of the City of San Diego as follows:

That the Hearing Officer adopts the following written Findings, dated August 26, 2015.

FINDINGS:

Coastal Development Permit - Section 126.0708

A. Findings for all Coastal Development Permits

1. The proposed coastal development will not encroach upon any existing physical accessway that is legally used by the public or any proposed public accessway identified in a Local Coastal Program land use plan; and the proposed coastal development will enhance and protect public views to and along the ocean and other scenic coastal areas as specified in the Local Coastal Program land use plan;

The proposed project, located at 9696 La Jolla Farms Road, is located approximately 500 feet east of the Pacific Ocean. The project is located within the La Jolla Community Plan and Local Coastal Program area. The site is developed with an existing 24,219 square-foot residential single-dwelling unit, with accessory structures, and associated improvements. The existing development was permitted with Coastal Development Permit No. 91-0270 and a Substantial Conformance Review under project number 63365. The project proposes to demolish a 1,286

Page 1 of8

ATTACHMENT 7

square-foot maintenance/security building and construct a 1,026 square-foot home gym and 1,164 square-foot home lounge. This will bring the total residence square-footage to 25,123 square-feet. The project also consists of a proposed 6,608 square-foot guest unit. The total building squarefootage of this project is 31,731 square-feet. As a component of the proposed project, the residence incorporates a roof-mounted photo voltaic system consisting of solar panels sufficient to generate at least 50 percent of the project's projected energy consumption, in conformance with the criteria of the Affordable/In-Fill Housing and Sustainable Buildings Expedite Program.

This project is separated from the ocean by significant coastal bluffs/cliffs, which result in an elevation difference of 340 feet. The project will not encroach upon any existing physical accessway that is legally used by the public or any proposed public accessway identified in the Local Coastal Program land use plan. The Local Coastal Program identifies coastal views through the site. In order to implement the Local Coastal Program and enhance and protect public views to and along the ocean, the property owner will dedicate a 1 0-foot view corridor easement near the northern property line. An existing tool shed, restroom, generator, and caretaker unit are currently located within the proposed view corridor and will be removed as part of this project. A 6-foot tall double gate, located across the view corridor, is required to be 75% open, in accordance with the open fencing permitted by LDC § 132.0403( e), in order to ensure that the public will be able to view the ocean from this vantage point.

The proposed development adheres to the RS-1-2 zone development regulations and no deviations are requested. Additionally, the proposed development complies with the 30-foot Coastal Height Limit Overlay zone. Based on this analysis, the proposed coastal development will not encroach upon any existing physical accessway that is legally used by the public or any proposed public accessway identified in a Local Coastal Program land use plan; and the proposed coastal development will enhance and protect public views to and along the ocean and other scenic coastal areas as specified in the Local Coastal Program land use plan.

2. The proposed coastal development will not adversely affect environmentally sensitive lands.

The proposed project, located at 9696 La Jolla Farms Road, is located approximately 500 feet east of the Pacific Ocean. The project is located within the La Jolla Community Plan and Local Coastal Program area. The site is developed with an existing 24,219 square-foot residential single-dwelling unit, with accessory structures, and associated improvements. The existing development was permitted with Coastal Development Permit No. 91-0270 and a Substantial Conformance Review under project number 63365. The project proposes to demolish a 1,286 square-footmaintenance/securitybuilding and construct a 1,026 square-foot home gym and 1,164 square-foot home lounge. This will bring the total residence square-footage to 25,123 square-feet. The project also consists of a proposed 6,608 square-foot guest unit. The total building squarefootage of this project is 31,731 square-feet. As a component of the proposed project, the residence incorporates a roof-mounted photovoltaic system consisting of solar panels sufficient to generate at least 50 percent ofthe project's projected energy consumption, in conformance with the criteria of the Affordable/In-Fill Housing and Sustainable Buildings Expedite Program.

This property contains enviromnentally sensitive lands (ESL) consisting of sensitive biological resources, Multi-Habitat Preservation Area (MHPA) lands, and a sensitive coastal bluff on the west side of the property. The proposed accessory structures are approximately 200 feet from all ESL and is separated from those lands by the existing residence. Therefore, there are no impacts

Page 2 of8

ATTACHMENT 7

to ESL as part of this development. A condition of the original permit required an open space easement for the bluff face. It does not appear that the open space easement was established; therefore this project requires a "covenant of easement" to protect the ESL on site. Based on the project's setback from ESL on site and the required covenant of easement, the project will not adversely affect ESL.

3. The proposed coastal development is in conformity with the certified Local Coastal Program land use plan and complies with all regulations of the certified Implementation Program.

The proposed project, located at 9696 La Jolla Farms Road, is located approximately 500 feet east of the Pacific Ocean. The project is located within the La Jolla Community Plan and Local Coastal Program area. The site is developed with an existing 24,219 square-foot residential single-dwelling unit, with accessory structures, and associated improvements. The existing development was permitted with Coastal Development Permit No. 91-0270 and a Substantial Conformance Review under project number 63365. The project proposes to demolish a 1,286 square-foot maintenance/security building and construct a 1,026 square-foot home gym and 1,164 square-foot home lounge. This will bring the total residence square-footage to 25,123 square-feet. The project also consists of a proposed 6,608 square-foot guest unit. The total building squarefootage of this project is 31,731 square-feet. As a component of the proposed project, the residence incorporates a roof-mounted photovoltaic system consisting of solar panels sufficient to generate at least 50 percent of the project's projected energy consumption, in conformance with the criteria of the Affordable/In-Fill Housing and Sustainable Buildings Expedite Program.

The proposed development is designated for residential development, with a maximum density of 0-5 dwelling units per acre (du/acre) as identified in the La Jolla Community Plan. The project proposes one dwelling unit on a 166,423 square-foot lot for a density of approximately 0.26 dwelling units per acre. The project is consistent with the designated use and density in the plan. Therefore, the proposed residential project conforms to the identified land use in the La Jolla Community Plan and Local Coastal Program, and the certified Implementation Program.

4. For every Coastal Development Permit issued for any coastal development between the nearest public road and the sea or the shoreline of any body of water located within the Coastal Overlay Zone the coastal development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act.

The proposed project, located at 9696 La Jolla Farms Road, is located approximately 500 feet east ofthe Pacific Ocean. The project is located within the La Jolla Community Plan and Local Coastal Program area. The site is developed with an existing 24,219 square-foot residential single-dwelling unit, with accessory structures, and associated improvements. The existing development was permitted with Coastal Development Permit No. 91-0270 and a Substantial Conformance Review under project number 63365. The project proposes to demolish a 1,286 square-foot maintenance/security building and construct a 1,026 square-foot home gym and 1,164 square-foot home lounge. This will bring the total residence square-footage to 25,123 square-feet. The project also consists of a proposed 6,608 square-foot guest unit. The total building squarefootage of this project is 31,731 square-feet. As a component of the proposed project, the residence incorporates a roof-mounted photovoltaic system consisting of solar panels sufficient to

Page 3 of8

ATTACHMENT 7

generate at least 50 percent of the project's projected energy consumption, in conformance with the criteria of the Affordable/In-Fill Housing and Sustainable Buildings Expedite Program. This project is located between the nearest public road and the shoreline of the Pacific Ocean. The California Coastal Act (CCA) states that access to the shore should not be prevented. In this case, the project site is located adjacent to a coastal bluff/cliff, which is 340 feet above the Pacific Ocean, located approximately 500 feet to the west. This development does not preclude public access to the Pacific Ocean, nor does it preclude recreational activities from occurring in and adjacent to the Pacific Ocean. The development is consistent with the surrounding development pattern, conforms to the RS-1-2 development regulations, and conforms with the La Jolla Community Plan and Local Coastal Program. No deviations are requested as part ofthis project. Based on these considerations, the project is in conformance with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the CCA.

Site Development Permit - Section 126.0504

A. Findings for all Site Development Permits

1. The proposed development will not adversely affect the applicable land use plan;


The proposed development is designated for residential development, with a maximum density of 0-5 dwelling units per acre (du/acre) as identified in the La Jolla Community Plan. The project proposes one dwelling unit on a 166,423 square-foot lot for a density of approximately 0.26 dwelling units per acre. The project is consistent with the designated use and density in the plan. Therefore, the proposed residential project conforms to the identified land use in the La Jolla Community Plan and Local Coastal Program.

2. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; and

The proposed development has been reviewed from compliance with the City's Land Development Code and no deviations have been requested. Before the issuance of construction pennits, the applicant will be required to submit construction detail-level documents to demonstrate compliance and confonnance with the applicable building codes. During and after

Page 4 of8

ATTACHMENT 7

construction, the Development Services Department will inspect the project to ensure compliance with the San Diego Municipal Code.

This property has certain geologic hazards which required additional review and analysis by the Development Services Department's Geology section. An "Update to Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation" dated October 28, 2014 was provided to address the work proposed as part of this project. In 1989, there was a previous landslide which occurred along the western limits of the property. The report indicates that this landslide was "removed, buttressed, and stabilized with shear pins ... " To monitor the slope stability, inclinometers were installed to detect movement. An analysis indicated that," ... negligible slope movement. .. " was present," .. .indicating adequate slope stability." While the site appears stable, the geology report recommends ongoing monitoring. The 2005 geology report indicates that the required 40-foot setback from coastal bluffs is sufficient and that the project actually observes a larger setback. The report also recommends specific construction requirements (such as foundation treatments) for the proposed development to ensure its stability.

Overall with the project's compliance with the Land Development Code, applicable building codes, and adherence to the recommendations of the geology report, the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.

3. The proposed development will comply with the applicable regulations of the Land Development Code, including any allowable deviations pursuant to the Land Development Code.

The proposed project, located at 9696 La Jolla Farms Road, is located approximately 500 feet east of the Pacific Ocean. The project is located within the La Jolla Community Plan and Local Coastal Program area. The site is developed with an existing 24,219 square-foot residential single-dwelling unit, with accessory structures, and associated improvements. The existing development was permitted with Coastal Development Permit No. 91-0270 and a Substantial Conformance Review under project number 63365. The project proposes to demolish a 1,286 square-foot maintenance/security building and construct a 1,026 square-foot home gym and 1,164 square-foot home lounge. This will bring the total residence square-footage to 25,123 square-feet. The project also consists of a proposed 6,608 square-foot guest unit. The total building squarefootage of this project is 31,731 square-feet. As a component of the proposed project, the residence incorporates a roof-mounted photovoltaic system consisting of solar panels sufficient to generate at least 50 percent of the project's projected energy consumption, in conformance with the criteria of the Affordable/In-Fill Housing and Sustainable Buildings Expedite Program. The project complies with the RS-1-2 development regulations and no deviations are requested. The project is located in the Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone and complies with the 30-foot Coastal Height Limit. The project is located within the Coastal Permit Overlay Zone- Appealable Area, and a Process Three Coastal Development Permit is being processed in addition to the Site Development Permit, which is required due to the presence of enviromnentally sensitive lands. Based on the design of the project and the permits required, the project complies with the applicable regulations of the Land Development Code.

B. Supplemental Findings--Environmentally Sensitive Lands

Page5of8

ATTACHMENT 7

1. The site is physically suitable for the design and siting of the proposed development and the development will result in minimum disturbance to environmentally sensitive lands;


The environmentally sensitive lands (ESL) associated with this project consist of sensitive biological resources, MHP A, and sensitive coastal bluffs. The on-site ESL is located on the western side of the property. The proposed additions to the existing residence and guest unit are located at least 150 feet from the ESL on site. The construction work associated with this project is separated from the ESL by the existing residence and existing improvements on site. The proposed construction is located on areas ofthe property that have been previously disturbed, therefore the project will result in minimum disturbance to ESL.

2. The proposed development will minimize the alteration of natural land forms and will not result in undue risk from geologic and erosional forces, flood hazards, or fire hazards;

The project as proposed involves demolition and additions to an existing single-dwelling unit residence, along with associated accessory structures. Alteration of natural land forms will be minimized, as the proposed construction activity will occur in areas of the property that have been previously disturbed. Since the property is located in an area with potential geologic hazards, the project has been reviewed by the Development Services Department's (DSD) Geology section and a Geotechnical Investigation was prepared for the site. Construction recommendations are provided so that the project will not result in undue risk :from geologic and erosional forces. Prior to the issuance of construction pennits, the project will be required to submit construction-level detail documents which will be reviewed by DSD for compliance with the applicable building codes, which will ensure that the development does not result in undue risk :from flood or fire hazards.

3. The proposed development will be sited and designed to prevent adverse impacts on any adjacent environmentally sensitive lands;

The proposed project, located at 9696 La Jolla Farms Road, is located approximately 500 feet east of the Pacific Ocean. The project is located within the La Jolla Community Plan and Local Coastal Program area. The site is developed with an existing 24,219 square-foot residential single-dwelling unit, with accessory structures, and associated improvements. The existing development was pennitted with Coastal Development Permit No. 91-0270 and a Substantial

Page 6 of8

ATTACHMENT 7

Conformance Review under project number 63365. The project proposes to demolish a 1,286 square-foot maintenance/security building and construct a 1,026 square-foot home gym and 1,164 square-foot home lounge. This will bring the total residence square-footage to 25,123 square-feet. The project also consists of a proposed 6,608 square-foot guest unit. The total building squarefootage of this project is 31,731 square-feet. As a component of the proposed project, the residence incorporates a roof-mounted photovoltaic system consisting of solar panels sufficient to generate at least 50 percent of the project's projected energy consumption, in conformance with the criteria of the Affordable/In-Fill Housing and Sustainable Buildings Expedite Program.

The environmentally sensitive lands (ESL) associated with this project consist of sensitive biological resources, MHP A, and sensitive coastal bluffs. The on-site ESL is located on the western side of the property. The proposed additions to the existing residence and guest unit are located at least 150 feet from the ESL on site. The construction work associated with this project is separated from the ESL by the existing residence and existing improvements on site. The proposed construction is located on areas of the property that have been previously disturbed, therefore the project will result in minimum disturbance to ESL. As a result, the proposed development has been sited and designed to prevent adverse impacts to adjacent and on-premises ESL.

4. The proposed development will be consistent with the City of San Diego's Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan;

A portion of the western side of the project premises contains a portion of the Multiple Habitat Planning Area (MHPA). As part of this project, a Covenent of Easement for preservation will be recorded against the property. The project has been reviewed by the City's Multiple Species Conservation Program review staff and determined to be consistent with the MSCP Subarea Plan.

5. The proposed development will not contribute to the erosion of public beaches or adversely impact local shoreline sand supply; and

This development has an existing storm water containment system that eliminates runoff to the public beach. The project does not propose to alter the existing storm water patterns or system. The development is located approximately 500 feet east ofthe Pacific Ocean with an elevation change of 340 feet. The proposed development will not contribute to the erosion of public beaches of adversely impact the local shoreline sand supply.

6. The nature and extent of mitigation required as a condition of the permit is reasonably related to, and calculated to alleviate, negative impacts created by the proposed development.

A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 353040 has been prepared for this project in accordance with the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which addresses potential impacts to Paleontological Resources and Historic Resources (Archaeology). A Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP) will be implemented with this project, which will reduce the potential impacts to below a level of significance. The mitigation required as a condition of this permit is reasonable related to, and calculated to alleviate, negative impacts created by the proposed development, as has been discussed in the MND.

Page 7 of8

ATTACHMENT 7

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based on the findings hereinbefore adopted by the Hearing Officer, Coastal Development Permit No. 1236014 and Site Development Permit No. 1236015 are hereby GRANTED by the Hearing Officer to the referenced Owner/Permittee, in the form, exhibits, terms and conditions as set forth in Permit Nos. 1236014 and 1236015, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.

Alex Hempton, AICP Development Project Manager Development Services

Adopted on: August 26, 2015

Job OrderNo.24004304

Page 8 of8

RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF SAN DIEGO

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PERMIT INTAKE, MAIL STATION 501

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PERMIT CLERK

MAIL STATION 501

ATTACHMENT 8

E FOR RECORDER'S USE INTERNAL ORDER NUMBER: 24004304

COASTAL DEVEL SITEDEVELO

ALTMANRESI AMENDMENT TO COASTA

RESO

This COASTAL PERMIT NO. 1236 Permit No. 91-0270) FAMILY TRUST, §126.070 1-2

H

ensitive Coastal Resource of the C1 of San Diego to the ALTMAN

Diego Municipal Code [SDMC] sections at 9696 La Jolla Farms Road in the RSZone, the Coastal Overlay Zone Impact Overlay Zone (Beach and

UH'U'-'HL Parking Overlay Zone, and the La Jolla

Subject to Owner/Permittee to

~,..."',.,.LU Area. The project site is legally described as: Lots No. 3487.

,L'UL''L~LLU set forth in this Permit, permission is granted to the accessory structures and construct new accessory

existing single-dwelling unit described and identified by size, dimension, quantity, type, location on the approved exhibits [Exhibit "A"] dated August 26, 2015, on file in the Development Services Department.

The project shall include:

a. A single-dwelling unit residence and guest house, totaling 31,731 square-feet, consisting of the following:

A. A 25,123 square-foot residence, consisting of the following:

Page 1 of8

ATTACHMENT 8

1. Buildings totaling 24,219 square-feet currently exist on site, consisting of a 17,724 square-foot first floor, 3,199 square-foot second floor, 2,010 square-foot garage all to remain, along with a 1,286 square-foot maintenance/security building to be removed.

n. A new 1,026 square-foot home gym and 1,164 square-foot lounge will be added to the existing residence, for a total of25,123 square-feet.

B. A new 6,608 square-foot accessory uuJLLUJlHje,

garage, 1,439 square-foot guest house, 1,1 00 square-foot home office.

"''"'uu . .., of a 3,623 square-foot guest garage, and a

b. Landscaping (planting, irrigation and 1

c. Off-street parking;

d. A roof-mounted photovoltaic system

e.

least 50 percent of the pro· · ected Council Policy 900-14;

the Development Services "''Vh'.'.U"''u standards for this site in

Environmental Quality s requirements, zoning

ny other applicable regulations of the

six (36) months after the date on which all rights uu'-~'""''"' in accordance with Chapter 12, Article-6,

LHv.aca period, this permit shall be void unless an Any such Extension of Time must meet all SDMC

requirements and appropriate decision

in effect at the time the extension is considered by the must be utilized by September 10, 2018.

2. This Coastal Development Permit shall become effective on the eleventh working day following receipt by the California Coastal Commission of the Notice of Final Action, or following all appeals.

3. No permit for the construction, occupancy, or operation of any facility or improvement described herein shall be granted, nor shall any activity authorized by this Permit be conducted on the premises until:

Page 2 of8

ATTACHMENT 8

a. The Owner/Permittee signs and returns the Permit to the Development Services Department; and

b. The Permit is recorded in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder.

4. While this Permit is in effect, the subject property shall be used only for the purposes and under the terms and conditions set forth in this Permit unless otherwise authorized by the appropriate City decision maker.

5. This Permit is a covenant running with the subject,....,.{"'\,,.....,. .. all of the requirements and the Owner/Permittee and conditions of this Permit and related documents shall be

any successor(s) in interest.

6. The continued use ofthis Permit shall be applicable governmental agency.

7. Issuance ofthis Permit by the City ofS for this Permit to violate any Federal, State or including, but not limited to, the thereto (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.).

8. infonned that to secure thesC£'pGrmits, may be required to vu.vu•J•v

State and Federal

of this and any other

~H'~H •• ,.., h':\oi.#¥'-H"· The Owner/Pennittee is .., .... ~'"'~·""' and site improvements

""''u'"''-'"'' and plumbing codes, and

to Exhibit "A." Changes, prohibited unless appropriate

granted.

10. Permit have been considered and were determinednecessary required to VV>.LHLL,L

granted by this

a! of this Permit. The Permit holder is ·on in order to maintain the entitlements that are

If any condition ofthi a legal challenge by the Owner/Permittee ofthis Permit, is found or held by a court jurisdiction to be invalid, unenforceable, or unreasonable, this Permit shall be void. , in such an event, the Owner/Permittee shall have the right, by paying applicable processing fees, to bring a request for a new permit without the "invalid" conditions(s) back to the discretionary body which approved the Permit for a determination by that body as to whether all of the findings necessary for the issuance of the proposed permit can still be made in the absence of the "invalid" condition(s). Such hearing shall be a hearing de novo, and the discretionary body shall have the absolute right to approve, disapprove, or modify the proposed permit and the condition(s) contained therein.

Page 3 of8

ATTACHMENT 8

11. The Owner/Permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney's fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify Owner/Permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and, if the City should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the Owner/Pennittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers, and employees. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim this indemnification. In the event of such election, Owner/Permittee shall pay all of thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs. of a disagreement between the City and Owner/Permittee regarding litigation i have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such

12. All conditions from the previous permit ( PERMIT/SENSITIVE COASTAL CE where there is a conflict with VVJ.H . .UH

the previous permit.

ENVIRONMENT

13. Mitigation shall apply to this reference.

Department and the the MMRP shall be

Program [MMRP] re hereby incorporated into this Pennit by

and outlined in MITIGATED noted on the construction plans and

AL MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS.

the MMRP as specified in MITIGATED 353040, to the satisfaction of the Development Services

Prior to issuance of any construction permit, all conditions of the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All mitigation measures

implemented for the following issue areas:

a. Paleontological Resources and Historic Resources (Archaeology)

ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS:

16. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Owner/Permittee shall obtain an Encroachment Maintenance and Removal Agreement for the existing non-standard driveway and curb outlet located within La Jolla Farms Road right-of-way, satisfactory to the City Engineer.

Page 4 of8

ATTACHMENT 8

17. Prior to the issuance of any construction permit, the Owner/Permittee shall enter into a Maintenance Agreement for the ongoing permanent BMP maintenance, satisfactory to the City Engineer.

18. Prior to the issuance of any construction permit, the Owner/Permittee shall incorporate any construction Best Management Practices necessary to comply with Chapter 14, Article 2, Division 1 (Grading Regulations) of the Municipal Code, into the construction plans or specifications.

19. Prior to the issuance of any construction permit, the Pollution Control Plan (WPCP). The WPCP shall be in Appendix E of the City's Storm Water Standards.

20. The drainage system for this project shall be City Engineer.

21. Prior to the issuance of any foundation building pad certification signed by a Registered certifying the pad elevation based datum the City Engineer.

22. Existing ..wuJL~uo,-.,u approved Sub_,<"-U""'"' additional u.u'·'-'"""u

with the guidelines

· ect to approval by the

VHJlLH'~:'fJ;,'LUHL submit an Surveyor,

atisfactory to

consistent with previously o CDP No. 91-0270. No

23. ed outside of the 40-foot Coastal Bluff

25. All required times. Severe pruning or Pennit.

, . le for the maintenance of all landscape · .,. including in the right-of-way, consistent with the

rH:\.IT"f"l"•riTI uL~uu•.vu'''-'"'v of said landscaping will be the responsibility or other approved entity.

maintained in a disease, weed and litter free condition at all of trees is not permitted unless specifically noted in this

26. If any required landscape indicated on the approved construction document plans is damaged or removed during demolition or construction, it shall be repaired and/or replaced in kind and equivalent size per the approved documents to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department within 30 days of damage or Final Inspection, in addition to the requirements set forth in LDC §142.0403(b)(8).

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS:

Page 5 of8

ATTACHMENT 8

27. No fewer than 6 off-street parking spaces (with 13 off-street parking spaces currently provided; 6 spaces exclusively to support the primary residence and 1 included within the guest quarter's garage) shall be permanently maintained on the property within the approximate location shown on the project's Exhibit "A."

28. All on-site parking stalls and aisle widths shall be in compliance with requirements ofthe San Diego Municipal Code (SDMC), and shall not be converted and/or utilized for any other purpose, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the appropriate City decision maker in accordance with the SDMC.

29. Any home office use must be maintained as an venue to convene with clients, and shall not be unless otherwise authorized in writing by the ., ..... ,ro..-n ..... ,.,

the SDMC.

for any other purpose, maker in accordance with

PLANNING/DESIGN REQUIREMENTS:

30. Prior to the issuance of any co foot wide View Corridor Easement accordance with SDMC section 132.

31. Prior to the issuance .. o£,any constru record a Covenant of Lands that are

'-'Tr<nlrln of the premises showing the as shown on Exhibit "A."

·ons ofthe SDMC maybe required if it is maybe a conflict between the building(s) under

a regulation of the underlying zone. The cost of "ttee.

3 3. Prior to the incorporation of a roo generate at least 50 p Council Policy 900-14.

permits, construction documents shall fully illustrate the 1 rlTl"lUrlltaic system consisting of solar panels sufficient to project's projected energy consumption, in accordance with

34. All private outdoor lighting shall be shaded and adjusted to fall on the same premises where such lights are located and in accordance with the applicable regulations in the SDMC.

35. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit for the guest quarters or habitable accessory building, the Owner/Permittee shall submit a signed agreement with the City that specifies that the guest quarters or habitable accessory building shall not be used as, or converted to, a companion unit or any other dwelling unit. The agreement shall include a stipulation that neither

Page 6 of8

ATTACHMENT 8

the primary dwelling unit nor the guest quarters or habitable accessory building shall be sold or conveyed separately. The City will provide the agreement to the County Recorder for recordation.

INFORMATION ONLY:

• The issuance of this discretionary use permit alone does not allow the immediate commencement or continued operation of the proposed use on site. The operation allowed by this discretionary use permit may only begin or recommence after all conditions listed on this permit are fully completed and all required mini permits have been issued and received final inspection.

• Any party on whom fees, dedications, as conditions of approval of this Permit, the approval of this development permit pursuant to California Government

Issuance.

APPROVED by the Hearing Officer [Approved Resolution Number].

Page 7 of8

'"""''"'u'JH" have been imposed within ninety days of "th the City Clerk

ATTACHMENT 8

Permit Type/PTS Approval No.: CDP No. 1236014/SDP No. 1236015 Date of Approval: 8/26/2015

AUTHENTICATED BY THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Alex Hempton, AICP Development Project Manager

NOTE: Notary acknowledgment must be attached per Civil Code section 1189 et seq.

The undersigned Owner/Permittee, this Permit and promises to perform eac

NOTE: Notary acknowledgments must be attached per Civil Code section 1189 et seq.

s to each and every condition of · · wner/Permittee hereunder.

AMILYTRUST

STEVEN R. ALTMAN OWNER

ALTMAN FAMILY TRUST Owner/Permittee

By __________________________ __ LISAJ. ALTMAN OWNER

Page 8 of8

ATTACHMENT 9

THE: CITY OF SAN DIEGO

DATE OF NOTICE: August 12,2015

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING HEARING OFFICER

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

DATE OF HEARING: TIME OF HEARING: LOCATION OF HEARING:

PROJECT TYPE:

PROJECT NO: PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT: COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: COUNCIL DISTRICT:

CITY PROJECT MANAGER: PHONE NUMBER/E-MAIL:

August 26, 2015 8:30A.M. Council Chambers, 12th Floor, City Administration Building, 202 C Street, San Diego, California 92101 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT and SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, PROCESS THREE 353040 ALTMAN RESIDENCE Jon Dominy, Domus Studio Architecture La Jolla 1

Alex Hempton, Development Project Manager (619) 446-5349 I [email protected]

As a property owner, tenant, or person who has requested notice, please be advised that the Hearing Officer will hold a public hearing to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application for a Coastal Development Permit and Site Development Permit, Process Three, to demolish an existing accessory structure, construct new additions to an existing single-dwelling unit residence, and construct a new 6,609 square-foot guest unit. The total square footage of all buildings on site will be 31,731 square-feet. The 3.82-acre site is located at 9696 La Jolla Farms Road. This project is located within the Coastal Overlay Zone (Appealable Area).

The decision of the Hearing Officer is final unless appealed to the Planning Commission. In order to appeal the decision you must be present at the public hearing and file a speaker slip concerning the application or have expressed interest by writing to the Hearing Officer before the close of the public hearing. The appeal must be made within 10 business days of the Hearing Officer's decision. Please do not e-mail appeals as they will not be accepted. See Information Bulletin 505 "Appeal Procedure", available at www.sandiego.gov/development-services or in person at the Development Services Department, located at 1222 First Avenue, 3rd Floor, San Diego, CA 92101

Page 1 of 2

ATTACHMENT 9

The decision made by the Planning Commission is the final decision by the City.

The certification of an Environmental Impact Report, adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration or Negative Declaration may be appealed to the City Council after all other appeal rights have been exhausted. All such appeals must be filed by 5:00PM within ten (10) business days from the date ofthe Planning Commission's certification/adoption of the environmental document. Please do not e-mail appeals as they will not be accepted. The proper forms are available from the City Clerk's Office, located on the second floor of the City Administration Building, 202 C Street, San Diego, CA 92101.

Appeals to the Coastal Commission must be filed with the Coastal Commission at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108. (Phone: 619-767-2370) Appeals must be filed within 10 business days of the Coastal Commission receiving aN otice of Final Action from the City of San Diego, Development Services Department. Please do not e-mail appeals as they will not be accepted. If you want to receive a Notice of Final Action, you must submit a written request to the City Project Manager listed above.

If you wish to challenge the City's action on the above proceedings in court, you may be limited to addressing only those issues you or someone else have raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or written in correspondence to the City at or before the public hearing. If you have any questions after reviewing this notice, you can call the City Project Manager listed above.

This information will be made available in alternative formats upon request. To request an agenda in alternative format or to request a sign language or oral interpreter for the meeting, call Support Services at (619) 321-3208 at least five business days prior to the meeting to insure availability. Assistive Listening Devices (ALD's) are also available for the meeting upon request.

Internal Order Number: 24004304

Revised 11-17-14 wjz

Page 2 of 2

ATTACHMENT 10

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

Project Chronology Altman Residence- Project No. 353040

City Review Applicant Date Action Description Time Response

1/16/2014 First Submittal Project Deemed Complete

2/18/2014 First Assessment Letter 33

4/17/2014 Second Submittal 58

5/2/2014 Second Assessment Letter 15

3/18/2015 Third Submittal 320

4/9/2015 Third Assessment Letter 22

4/30/2015 Fourth Submittal 21

5/27/2015 Fourth Assessment Letter 27

6/5/2015 Fifth Submittal 9

6/15/2015 All Review Issues Cleared 10

6/19/2015 Draft MND Issued 4

7/10/2015 MND Final 21

8/26/2015 Hearing Officer - Public 47 Hearing

TOTAL STAFF TIME 179 days

TOTAL APPLICANT TIME 408 days

TOTAL PROJECT RUNNING TIME 587 days = 19.57 months

Page 1 of 1

RESOLUTION NUMBER R-____ _

ADOPTED ON August 26,2015

ATTACHMENT 11 (R-[Reso Code])

WHEREAS, on January 16, 2014, the Altman Family Trust submitted an application to

Development Services Department for a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 1236014 and

Site Development Permit No. 1236015 for the Altman Residence (Project); and

WHEREAS, the matter was set for a public hearing to be conducted by the Hearing

Officer of the City of San Diego; and

WHEREAS, the issue was heard by the Hearing Officer on August 26, 2015; and

WHEREAS, the Hearing Officer considered the issues discussed in Mitigated Negative

Declaration No. 353040 (Declaration) prepared for this Project; NOW THEREFORE,

BE IT RESOLVED, by the Hearing Officer that it is certified that the Declaration has

been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA)

(Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), as amended, and the State CEQA Guidelines

thereto (California Code ofRegulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15000 et seq.), that the

Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City of San Diego as Lead Agency and that

the information contained in said Declaration, together with any comments received during the

public review process, has been reviewed and considered by the Hearing Officer in connection

with the approval of the Project.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Hearing Officer finds on the basis of the entire

record that project revisions now mitigate potentially significant effects on the environment

previously identified in the Initial Study, that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will

have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore, that said Declaration is hereby

adopted.

-PAGE 1 OF 13-


BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to CEQA Section 21081.6, the Hearing

Officer hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, or alterations to

implement the changes to the Project as required by this Hearing Officer in order to mitigate or

avoid significant effects on the environment, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Declaration and other documents constituting

the record of proceedings upon which the approval is based are available to the public at the

office of the Development Services Department, 1222 First Avenue, San Diego, CA 92101.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Development Services Staff is directed to file a

Notice of Determination with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors for the County of San Diego

regarding the Project.

By: Alex Hempton, AICP, Development Project Manager

ATTACHMENT(S): Exhibit A, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

-PAGE 2 OF 13-

EXHIBIT A


MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (CDP) NO. 1236014

SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1236015 PROJECT NO. 353040

This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is designed to ensure compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 during implementation of mitigation measures. This program identifies at a minimum: the department responsible for the monitoring, what is to be monitored, how the monitoring shall be accomplished, the monitoring and reporting schedule, and completion requirements. A record of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program will be maintained at the offices of the Entitlements Division, 1222 First Avenue, Fifth Floor, San Diego, CA, 92101. All mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 353040 shall be made conditions of COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (CDP) NO. 1236014 and SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1236015 as may be further described below.

PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES

I. Prior to Permit Issuance A. Entitlements Plan Check

1. Prior to issuance of any construction permits, including but not limited to, the first Grading Permit, Demolition Plans/Permits and Building Plans/Permits or a Notice to Proceed for Subdivisions, but prior to the first preconstruction meeting, whichever is applicable,. the Assistant Deputy Director (ADD) Environmental designee shall verify that the requirements for Paleontological Monitoring have been noted on the appropriate construction documents.

B. Letters of Qualification have been submitted to ADD 1. The applicant shall submit a letter of verification to Mitigation Monitoring

Coordination (MMC) identifying the Principal Investigator (PI) for the project and the names of all persons involved in the paleontological monitoring program, as defined in the City of San Diego Paleontology Guidelines.

2. MMC will provide a letter to the applicant confirming the qualifications of the PI and all persons involved in the paleontological monitoring of the project.

3. Prior to the start of work, the applicant shall obtain approval from MMC for any personnel changes associated with the monitoring program.

II. Prior to Start of Construction A. Verification of Records Search

1. The PI shall provide verification to MMC that a site specific records search has been completed. Verification includes, but is not limited to a copy of a confirmation letter from San Diego Natural History Museum, other institution or, if the search was in-house, a letter of verification from the PI stating that the search was completed.

2. The letter shall introduce any pertinent information concerning expectations and probabilities of discovery during trenching and/or grading activities.

B. PI Shall Attend Precon Meetings

-PAGE 3 OF 13-


1. Prior to beginning any work that requires monitoring; the Applicant shall arrange a Precon Meeting that shall include the PI, Construction Manager (CM) and/or Grading Contractor, Resident Engineer (RE), Building Inspector (BI), if appropriate, and MMC. The qualified paleontologist shall attend any grading/excavation related Precon Meetings to make comments and/or suggestions concerning the Paleontological Monitoring program with the Construction Manager and/or Grading Contractor. a. If the PI is unable to attend the Precon Meeting, the Applicant shall schedule a

focused Precon Meeting with MMC, the PI, RE, CM or BI, if appropriate, prior to the start of any work that requires monitoring.

2. Identify Areas to be Monitored Prior to the start of any work that requires monitoring, the PI shall submit a Paleontological Monitoring Exhibit (PME) based on the appropriate construction documents (reduced to llx17) to MMC identifying the areas to be monitored including the delineation of grading/excavation limits. The PME shall be based on the results of a site specific records search as well as information regarding existing known soil conditions (native or formation).

3. When Monitoring Will Occur a. Prior to the start of any work, the PI shall also submit a construction schedule

to MMC through the RE indicating when and where monitoring will occur. b. The PI may submit a detailed letter to MMC prior to the start of work or

during construction requesting a modification to the monitoring program. This request shall be based on relevant information such as review of final construction documents which indicate conditions such as depth of excavation and/or site graded to bedrock, presence or absence of fossil resources, etc., which may reduce or increase the potential for resources to be present.

III. During Construction A. Monitor Shall be Present During Grading/Excavation/Trenching

1. The monitor shall be present full-time during grading/excavation/trenching activities as identified on the PME that could result in impacts to formations with high and moderate resource sensitivity. The Construction Manager is responsible for notifying theRE, PI, and MMC of changes to any construction activities such as in the case of a potential safety concern within the area being monitored. In certain circumstances OSHA safety requirements may necessitate modification of the PME.

2. The PI may submit a detailed letter to MMC during construction requesting a modification to the monitoring program when a field condition such as trenching activities that do not encounter formational soils as previously assumed, and/or when unique/unusual fossils are encountered, which may reduce or increase the potential for resources to be present.

3. The monitor shall document field activity via the Consultant Site Visit Record (CSVR). The CSVR's shall be faxed by the CM to theRE the first day of monitoring, the last day of monitoring, monthly (Notification of Monitoring Completion), and in the case of ANY discoveries. The RE shall forward copies toMMC.

-PAGE 4 OF 13-

B. Discovery Notification Process


1. In the event of a discovery, the Paleontological Monitor shall direct the contractor to temporarily divert trenching activities in the area of discovery and immediately notify the RE or BI, as appropriate.

2. The Monitor shall immediately notify the PI (unless Monitor is the PI) of the discovery.

3. The PI shall immediately notify MMC by phone of the discovery, and shall also submit written documentation to MMC within 24 hours by fax or email with photos of the resource in context, if possible.

C. Determination of Significance 1. The PI shall evaluate the significance of the resource.

a. The PI shall immediately notify MMC by phone to discuss significance determination and shall also submit a letter to MMC indicating whether additional mitigation is required. The determination of significance for fossil discoveries shall be at the discretion of the PI.

b. If the resource is significant, the PI shall submit a Paleontological Recovery Program (PRP) and obtain written approval from MMC. Impacts to significant resources must be mitigated before ground disturbing activities in the area of discovery will be allowed to resume.

c. If resource is not significant (e.g., small pieces ofbroken common shell fragments or other scattered common fossils) the PI shall notify theRE, or BI as appropriate, that a non-significant discovery has been made. The Paleontologist shall continue to monitor the area without notification to MMC unless a significant resource is encountered.

d. The PI shall submit a letter to MMC indicating that fossil resources will be collected, curated, and documented in the Final Monitoring Report. The letter shall also indicate that no further work is required.

IV. Night and/or Weekend Work A. If night and/or weekend work is included in the contract

1. When night and/or weekend work is included in the contract package, the extent and timing shall be presented and discussed at the precon meeting.

2. The following procedures shall be followed. a. No Discoveries

In the event that no discoveries were encountered during night and/or weekend work, The PI shall record the information on the CSVR and submit to MMC via fax by 8AM on the next business day.

b. Discoveries All discoveries shall be processed and documented using the existing procedures detailed in Sections III - During Construction.

c. Potentially Significant Discoveries If the PI determines that a potentially significant discovery has been made, the procedures detailed under Section III - During Construction shall be followed.

d. The PI shall immediately contact MMC, or by 8AM on the next business day to report and discuss the findings as indicated in Section III-B, unless other specific arrangements have been made.

-PAGE 5 OF 13-


B. If night work becomes necessary during the course of construction 1. The Construction Manager shall notify the RE, or BI, as appropriate, a minimum

of 24 hours before the work is to begin. 2. TheRE, or BI, as appropriate, shall notify MMC immediately.

C. All other procedures described above shall apply, as appropriate.

V. Post Construction A. Preparation and Submittal of Draft Monitoring Report

1. The PI shall submit two copies of the Draft Monitoring Report (even if negative), prepared in accordance with the Paleontological Guidelines which describes the results, analysis, and conclusions of all phases of the Paleontological Monitoring Program (with appropriate graphics) to MMC for review and approval within 90 days following the completion of monitoring, a. For significant paleontological resources encountered during monitoring, the

Paleontological Recovery Program shall be included in the Draft Monitoring Report.

b. Recording Sites with the San Diego Natural History Museum The PI shall be responsible for recording (on the appropriate forms) any significant or potentially significant fossil resources encountered during the Paleontological Monitoring Program in accordance with the City's Paleontological Guidelines, and submittal of such forms to the San Diego Natural History Museum with the Final Monitoring Report.

2. MMC shall return the Draft Monitoring Report to the PI for revision or, for preparation of the Final Report.

3. The PI shall submit revised Draft Monitoring Report to MMC for approval. 4. MMC shall provide written verification to the PI of the approved report. 5. MMC shall notify the RE or BI, as appropriate, of receipt of all Draft Monitoring

Report submittals and approvals. B. Handling of Fossil Remains

1. The PI shall be responsible for ensuring that all fossil remains collected are cleaned and catalogued.

2. The PI shall be responsible for ensuring that all fossil remains are analyzed to identify function and chronology as they relate to the geologic history of the area; that faunal material is identified as to species; and that specialty studies are completed, as appropriate

C. Curation of fossil remains: Deed of Gift and Acceptance Verification 1. The PI shall be responsible for ensuring that all fossil remains associated with the

monitoring for this project are permanently curated with an appropriate institution.

2. The PI shall include the Acceptance Verification from the curation institution in the Final Monitoring Report submitted to the RE or BI and MMC.

D. Final Monitoring Report(s) 1. The PI shall submit two copies of the Final Monitoring Report to MMC (even if

negative), within 90 days after notification from MMC that the draft report has been approved.

-PAGE 6 OF 13-


2. TheRE shall, in no case, issue the Notice of Completion until receiving a copy of the approved Final Monitoring Report from MMC which includes the Acceptance Verification from the curation institution.

The above mitigation monitoring and reporting program will require additional fees and/or deposits to be collected prior to the issuance of building permits, certificates of occupancy and/or final maps to ensure the successful completion of the monitoring program.

HISTORICAL RESOURCES (ARCHAEOLOGY)

I. Prior to Permit Issuance A. Entitlements Plan Check

1. Prior to issuance of any construction permits, including but not limited to, the first Grading Permit, Demolition Plans/Permits and Building Plans/Permits or a Notice to Proceed for Subdivisions, but prior to the first preconstruction meeting, whichever is applicable, the Assistant Deputy Director (ADD) Environmental designee shall verify that the requirements for Archaeological Monitoring and Native American monitoring have been noted on the applicable construction documents through the plan check process.

B. Letters of Qualification have been submitted to ADD 1. The applicant shall submit a letter ofverification to Mitigation Monitoring

Coordination (MMC) identifying the Principal Investigator (PI) for the project and the names of all persons involved in the archaeological monitoring program, as defined in the City of San Diego Historical Resources Guidelines (HRG). If applicable, individuals involved in the archaeological monitoring program must have completed the 40-hour HAZWOPER training with certification documentation.

2. MMC will provide a letter to the applicant confirming the qualifications of the PI and all persons involved in the archaeological monitoring of the project meet the qualifications established in the HRG.

3. Prior to the start of work, the applicant must obtain written approval from MMC for any personnel changes associated with the monitoring program.

II. Prior to Start of Construction A. Verification of Records Search

1. The PI shall provide verification to MMC that a site specific records search (1/4 mile radius) has been completed. Verification includes, but is not limited to a copy of a confirmation letter from South Coastal Information Center, or, if the search was in-house, a letter of verification from the PI stating that the search was completed.

2. The letter shall introduce any pertinent information concerning expectations and probabilities of discovery during trenching and/or grading activities.

3. The PI may submit a detailed letter to MMC requesting a reduction to the );,; mile radius.

B. PI Shall Attend Precon Meetings

-PAGE 7 OF 13-


1. Prior to beginning any work that requires monitoring; the Applicant shall arrange a Precon Meeting that shall include the PI, Native American consultant/monitor (where Native American resources may be impacted), Construction Manager (CM) and/or Grading Contractor, Resident Engineer (RE), Building Inspector (BI), if appropriate, and MMC. The qualified Archaeologist and Native American Monitor shall attend any grading/ excavation related Precon Meetings to make comments and/or suggestions concerning the Archaeological Monitoring program with the Construction Manager and/or Grading Contractor. a. If the PI is unable to attend the Precon Meeting, the Applicant shall schedule a

focused Precon Meeting with MMC, the PI, RE, CM or BI, if appropriate, prior to the start of any work that requires monitoring.

2. Identify Areas to be Monitored a. Prior to the start of any work that requires monitoring, the PI shall submit an

Archaeological Monitoring Exhibit (AME) (with verification that the AME has been reviewed and approved by the Native American consultant/monitor when Native American resources may be impacted) based on the appropriate construction documents (reduced to llxl7) to MMC identifying the areas to be monitored including the delineation of grading/excavation limits. b. The AME shall be based on the results of a site specific records search as well

as information regarding existing known soil conditions (native or formation). 3. When Monitoring Will Occur

a. Prior to the start of any work, the PI shall also submit a construction schedule to MMC through the RE indicating when and where monitoring will occur.

b. The PI may submit a detailed letter to MMC prior to the start of work or during construction requesting a modification to the monitoring program. This request shall be based on relevant information such as review of final construction documents which indicate site conditions such as depth of excavation and/or site graded to bedrock, etc., which may reduce or increase the potential for resources to be present.

III. During Construction A. Monitor( s) Shall be Present During Grading/Excavation/Trenching

1. The Archaeological Monitor shall be present full-time during all soil disturbing and grading/excavation/trenching activities which could result in impacts to archaeological resources as identified on the AME. The Construction Manager is responsible for notifying the RE, PI, and MMC of changes to any construction activities such as in the case of a potential safety concern within the area being monitored. In certain circumstances OSHA safety requirements may necessitate modification of the AME.

2. The Native American consultant/monitor shall determine the extent of their presence during soil disturbing and grading/excavation/trenching activities based on the AME and provide that information to the PI and MMC. If prehistoric resources are encountered during the Native American consultant/monitor's absence, work shall stop and the Discovery Notification Process detailed in Section III.B-C and IV.A-D shall commence.

-PAGE 8 OF 13-


3. The PI may submit a detailed letter to MMC during construction requesting a modification to the monitoring program when a field condition such as modem disturbance post-dating the previous grading/trenching activities, presence of fossil formations, or when native soils are encountered that may reduce or increase the potential for resources to be present.

4. The archaeological and Native American consultant/monitor shall document field activity via the Consultant Site Visit Record (CSVR). The CSVR's shall be faxed by the CM to theRE the first day of monitoring, the last day of monitoring, monthly (Notification of Monitoring Completion), and in the case of ANY discoveries. The RE shall forward copies to MMC.

B. Discovery Notification Process 1. In the event of a discovery, the Archaeological Monitor shall direct the contractor

to temporarily divert all soil disturbing activities, including but not limited to digging, trenching, excavating or grading activities in the area of discovery and in the area reasonably suspected to overlay adjacent resources and immediately notify the RE or BI, as appropriate.

2. The Monitor shall immediately notify the PI (unless Monitor is the PI) of the discovery.

3. The PI shall immediately notify MMC by phone of the discovery, and shall also submit written documentation to MMC within 24 hours by fax or email with photos ofthe resource in context, if possible.

4. No soil shall be exported off-site until a determination can be made regarding the significance of the resource specifically ifNative American resources are encountered.

C. Determination of Significance 1. The PI and Native American consultant/monitor, where Native American

resources are discovered shall evaluate the significance of the resource. If Human Remains are involved, follow protocol in Section IV below. a. The PI shall immediately notify MMC by phone to discuss significance

determination and shall also submit a letter to MMC indicating whether additional mitigation is required.

b. If the resource is significant, the PI shall submit an Archaeological Data Recovery Program (ADRP) which has been reviewed by the Native American consultant/monitor, and obtain written approval from MMC. Impacts to significant resources must be mitigated before ground disturbing activities in the area of discovery will be allowed to resume. Note: If a unique archaeological site is also an historical resource as defined in CEQA, then the limits on the amount(s) that a project applicant may be required to pay to cover mitigation costs as indicated in CEQA Section 21083.2 shall not apply.

c. If the resource is not significant, the PI shall submit a letter to MMC indicating that artifacts will be collected, curated, and documented in the Final Monitoring Report. The letter shall also indicate that that no further work is required.

-PAGE 9 OF 13-

IV. Discovery of Human Remains


If human remains are discovered, work shall halt in that area and no soil shall be exported off-site until a determination can be made regarding the provenance of the human remains; and the following procedures as set forth in CEQA Section 15064.5(e), the California Public Resources Code (Sec. 5097.98) and State Health and Safety Code (Sec. 7050.5) shall be undertaken: A. Notification

1. Archaeological Monitor shall notify the RE or BI as appropriate, MMC, and the PI, if the Monitor is not qualified as a PI. MMC will notify the appropriate Senior Planner in the Environmental Analysis Section (BAS) of the Development Services Department to assist with the discovery notification process.

2. The PI shall notify the Medical Examiner after consultation with theRE, either in person or via telephone.

B. Isolate discovery site 1. Work shall be directed away from the location of the discovery and any nearby

area reasonably suspected to overlay adjacent human remains until a determination can be made by the Medical Examiner in consultation with the PI concerning the provenance of the remains.

2. The Medical Examiner, in consultation with the PI, will determine the need for a field examination to determine the provenance.

3. If a field examination is not warranted, the Medical Examiner will determine with input from the PI, if the remains are or are most likely to be ofN ative American ongm.

C. If Human Remains ARE determined to be Native American 1. The Medical Examiner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission

(NAHC) within 24 hours. By law, ONLY the Medical Examiner can make this call.

2. NAHC will immediately identify the person or persons determined to be the Most Likely Descendent (MLD) and provide contact information.

3. The MLD will contact the PI within 24 hours or sooner after the Medical Examiner has completed coordination, to begin the consultation process in accordance with CEQA Section 15064.5(e), the California Public Resources and Health & Safety Codes.

4. The MLD will have 48 hours to make recommendations to the property owner or representative, for the treatment or disposition with proper dignity, of the human remains and associated grave goods.

5. Disposition ofNative American Human Remains will be determined between the MLD and the PI, and, if: a. The NAHC is unable to identify the MLD, OR the MLD failed to make a

recommendation within 48 hours after being notified by the Commission; OR; b. The landowner or authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the

MLD and mediation in accordance with PRC 5097.94 (k) by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner, THEN,

c. In order to protect these sites, the Landowner shall do one or more of the following: (1) Record the site with the NAHC;

-PAGE 10 OF 13-


(2) Record an open space or conservation easement on the site; (3) Record a document with the County.

d. Upon the discovery of multiple Native American human remains during a ground disturbing land development activity, the landowner may agree that additional conferral with descendants is necessary to consider culturally appropriate treatment of multiple Native American human remains. Culturally appropriate treatment of such a discovery may be ascertained from review of the site utilizing cultural and archaeological standards. Where the parties are unable to agree on the appropriate treatment measures the human remains and items associated and buried with Native American human remains shall be reinterred with appropriate dignity, pursuant to Section S.c., above.

D. If Human Remains are NOT Native American 1. The PI shall contact the Medical Examiner and notify them of the historic era

context of the burial. 2. The Medical Examiner will determine the appropriate course of action with the PI

and City staff (PRC 5097.98). 3. If the remains are of historic origin, they shall be appropriately removed and

conveyed to the San Diego Museum of Man for analysis. The decision for internment of the human remains shall be made in consultation with MMC, EAS, the applicant/landowner, any known descendant group, and the San Diego Museum ofMan.

V. Night and/or Weekend Work A. If night and/or weekend work is included in the contract

1. When night and/or weekend work is included in the contract package, the extent and timing shall be presented and discussed at the precon meeting.

2. The following procedures shall be followed. a. No Discoveries

In the event that no discoveries were encountered during night and/or weekend work, the PI shall record the information on the CSVR and submit to MMC via fax by 8AM of the next business day.

b. Discoveries All discoveries shall be processed and documented using the existing procedures detailed in Sections III- During Construction, and IV- Discovery of Human Remains. Discovery of human remains shall always be treated as a significant discovery.

c. Potentially Significant Discoveries If the PI determines that a potentially significant discovery has been made, the procedures detailed under Section III- During Construction and IV-Discovery of Human Remains shall be followed.

d. The PI shall immediately contact MMC, or by 8AM of the next business day to report and discuss the findings as indicated in Section III-B, unless other specific arrangements have been made.

B. If night and/or weekend work becomes necessary during the course of construction

-PAGE 11 OF 13-


1. The Construction Manager shall notify the RE, or BI, as appropriate, a minimum of 24 hours before the work is to begin.

2. TheRE, or BI, as appropriate, shall notify MMC immediately. C. All other procedures described above shall apply, as appropriate.

VI. Post Construction A. Preparation and Submittal of Draft Monitoring Report

1. The PI shall submit two copies ofthe Draft Monitoring Report (even if negative), prepared in accordance with the Historical Resources Guidelines (Appendix C/D) which describes the results, analysis, and conclusions of all phases of the Archaeological Monitoring Program (with appropriate graphics) to MMC for review and approval within 90 days following the completion of monitoring. It should be noted that if the PI is unable to submit the Draft Monitoring Report within the allotted 90-day timeframe resulting from delays with analysis, special study results or other complex issues, a schedule shall be submitted to MMC establishing agreed due dates and the provision for submittal of monthly status reports until this measure can be met. a. For significant archaeological resources encountered during monitoring, the

Archaeological Data Recovery Program shall be included in the Draft Monitoring Report.

b. Recording Sites with State of California Department ofParks and Recreation The PI shall be responsible for recording (on the appropriate State of California Department of Park and Recreation forms-DPR 523 A/B) any significant or potentially significant resources encountered during the Archaeological Monitoring Program in accordance with the City's Historical Resources Guidelines, and submittal of such forms to the South Coastal Information Center with the Final Monitoring Report.

2. MMC shall return the Draft Monitoring Report to the PI for revision or, for preparation of the Final Report.

3. The PI shall submit revised Draft Monitoring Report to MMC for approval. 4. MMC shall provide written verification to the PI of the approved report. 5. MMC shall notify the RE or BI, as appropriate, of receipt of all Draft Monitoring

Report submittals and approvals. B. Handling of Artifacts

1. The PI shall be responsible for ensuring that all cultural remains collected are cleaned and catalogued

2. The PI shall be responsible for ensuring that all artifacts are analyzed to identify function and chronology as they relate to the history of the area; that faunal material is identified as to species; and that specialty studies are completed, as appropriate.

3. The cost for curation is the responsibility of the property owner. C. Curation of artifacts: Accession Agreement and Acceptance Verification

1. The PI shall be responsible for ensuring that all artifacts associated with the survey, testing and/or data recovery for this project are permanently curated with an appropriate institution. This shall be completed in consultation with MMC and the Native American representative, as applicable.

-PAGE 12 OF 13-


2. The PI shall include the Acceptance Verification from the curation institution in the Final Monitoring Report submitted to theRE or BI and MMC.

3. When applicable to the situation, the PI shall include written verification from the Native American consultant/monitor indicating that Native American resources were treated in accordance with state law and/or applicable agreements. If the resources were reinterred, verification shall be provided to show what protective measures were taken to ensure no further disturbance occurs in accordance with Section IV- Discovery of Human Remains, Subsection 5.

D. Final Monitoring Report(s) 1. The PI shall submit one copy of the approved Final Monitoring Report to the RE

or BI as appropriate, and one copy to MMC (even if negative), within 90 days after notification from MMC that the draft report has been approved.

2. TheRE shall, in no case, issue the Notice of Completion and/or release of the Performance Bond for grading until receiving a copy of the approved Final Monitoring Report from MMC which includes the Acceptance Verification from the curation institution.

The above mitigation monitoring and reporting program will require additional fees and/or deposits to be collected prior to the issuance of building permits, certificates of occupancy and/or final maps to ensure the successful completion of the monitoring program.

-PAGE 13 OF 13-

1-z w ~ I 0

~ I<(

Q) 0> C\1

0...

N "r"

I-

<( z LlJ

Q.) 0'> ro E

~

·-

I

"E>,

0

(/) Q.)

<(

~ 2:

I-I-

u.. ::::J

<(

co (/) 0 '0 co~ _Jo ~.c <Oc_ 0'>

<.0 "r" -0 N (]) 0) ro

0...

1-z w ~ I ()

~ 1-<(

(0 ..--0 (")

(]) 0) ro a..

N ~

I-

0 z w

Q) 0> ro E

~ I 0

.:: I-

"E>. !/) Q)

§ 2: 1..1- :::J

<I:

ro Cl) 0

J 0 ro..,

.....1 0 ~..c <.Oo_ 0')

N "r"

1-

0 z w

(].) 0> ro E

~ I () <( 1-1-

"E~ C/) (].)

~ 2: u. ::J

<(

co en 0

...., 0 co+J

....J 0 ~.c <Oc.. 0'>

<.0 "r"

4-0 l{)

(!) 0') ro

CL

N "!""""

1-z w ~ I u ~ 1-<(

<.0 "!""""

4-0

<.0 Q) 0> ro 0..

N ...--I-

LL z w

(]) 0) ro E

~

·-

I

"E~

()

en (])

<(

~ ~

I-I-

LL ::J

<(

ro en 0

'0 ro+-' _J 0 ~..c meL Ol

c.o ...---0 I'(]) 0') ro

a..

N "r"

1-

<.9 z w

Q.) 0) ro E

~ I u <( 1-1-

"E>. (J) Q.)

~ c LL ::::J

<(

ro (/) 0

'0 ro......, _Jo ~..c <.oo.. O'l

<0 "r" -0 co Q) Ol ro

0...

ATTACHMENT 12

Page 9 of 16

ATTACHMENT 12

Page 10 of 16

ATTACHMENT 12

Page 11 of 16

ATTACHMENT 12

Page 12 of 16

ATTACHMENT 12

Page 13 of 16

of 16

,_ ' .,~ .. !~

;. i:.. ... ,..*' L- .-~{;;~:li

1 J ....:. i.tl!( ~. r• ...,.

"t ·~

~-·

ATTACHMENT 12

of 16

ATTACHMENT 12

_.

~

• .. , I~ .._4·

I

·.

' ... - - .

:

•

E J; 0 ..... 0

..c: a. Q) ..... ·en

J J.

.~ jJ ; ; .: ( . } r. ,. (' • ~

'

·_ -~1 -~ -!

f

_. _.

Page 16 of 16

•. Jj . ' ' llf i., :,

•. 'f:; . ,.,., ·.~ • \i . '

I t.f. t ~ h~ .

!

:.~: ..

..

I 1

ATTACHMENT 12

.. ,'· I ' 1.•, • l,· '' .. ~ ~ \ ·: ..

., ., ; . ,, v .

•. ·1 , It t

.. ' • ,,., 'l

' I \ ' r

.1 ' {) 'J .•. · . j· I I

·"

Attention:

Project:

ATTACHMENT 13

P.O. Box 889 La Jolla CA 92038 Ph 858.456.7900 http://www .LaJ ollaCP A.org Email: Info@LaJ ollaCP A.org

Regular Meeting - 7 May 2015

Laura Black, PM, City of San Diego

Altman Residence 9696 La Jolla Farms Road PN: 353040

Motion: To accept the recommendations of the DPR Vote: 15-0-1 Committee for Altman Residence, 9696 La Jolla Farms Road that the findings can be made for a Site Development Permit & Coastal Development Permit to Amend CDP/SCR to demolish existing accessory structure & construct a detached guest house, garage and storage structure.

Submitted by: CJP~ [A&v,._ 5/07/2015

Joe LaCava, President Date La Jolla Community Planning Association

Page 1 of 1

Clty of San Diego Developm(!nt Services 1222 First Ave., MS~302 Sa 92101

ATTACHMENT 14

Ownership Disclosure Statement

Approval Type: Check appropriate box for type of approval (s) requested: r Neighborhood Use Permit rK Coastal Development Permit

~ Neighborhood Development Permit r Site Development Permit r Planned Development Permit r Conditional Use Permit rvariance r Tentative Map r Vesting Tentative Map r Map Waiver r Land Use Pl.an Amendment • r Other

Project Title Project No. For City Use Only

Altman residence garage addition 553t)(/ 0 Project Address:

9696 La Jolla Farms rd.

Part I· To be completed when property Is held by lndiVidual(s)

By signing the OWnership Disclosure Statement the owner(sl acknowledge tbat an application for·a permit. map or other matter. as identified above. will be filed with the City of San Diego on the suf:llect property. wl!h the intent to record an encumbrance against the property, Please fist below the owner(s) and tenant(s) (if applicable) of the above referenced property. The list must include the names and addresses of all persons who have an interestln the property, recorded or otherwise, and state the type of property interest (e.g., tenants who will benefit from the permit, all individuals who own the property). A signature is required of at least one of the property owners. Attach additional pages if needed, A signature from the Assistant Executive Director of the San Diego Redevelopment Agency shall be required for all project parcels for which a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) has been approved I executed by the City Council. Note: The applicant is responsible for notifying the Project Manager of any changes in ownership during the time the application is being processed or considered. Changes in ownership are to be given to the Project Manager at least thirty days prior to any public hearing on the subject property. Failure to provide accurate and current ownership information could result in a delay in the hearing process.

Additional pages attac;hed r Yes r No

Name of lndiVIClual (tYpe or pnnt): ~=-'"'.:::"-': L.i.v .. t;ll. 'K . A- If m tt. f'l

fj(:. Owner l TenanVLessee r Redevelopment Agency

J Owner ITenanVLessee !Redevelopment Agency l Owner rrenanULessee l RedevelopmentAgency

Street Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone No:

Signature:

Street Address:

City/State/Zip:

Fax No: Phone No:

Date: Signature:

Printed on recycled paper. Visit our web site at [email protected]/deveiopmeot-servlces Upon request, this information is availa.ble in alternative formats for persons with disabilities.

DS-318 (5-05)

Page 1 of 2

Fax No:

Date:

ATTACHMENT14 Project Title: I Project No. (For City use Only)

II Part II *To be completed when property Is held by a corporation or partnership

Legal Status (please check):

r Corporation r Limited Liability -or- r General) What State? __ ·_ Corporate Identification No. -----r Partnership

By signing the Ownership Disclosure Statement. the owner(s) acknowledge that an agplication for a permit. map or other matter. as identified above. will be filed with the City of San Diego on the subject property with the intent to record an encumbrance against the property .. Please list below the names, titles and addresses of all persons who have an interest in the property, recorded or

''.Qtherwise, and state the type of property interest (e.g., tenants who will benefit from the permit, all corporate officers, and all partners 'il1apartnership who own the property}. A signature is regujred of at least one of the corporate officers or partners who own the prqperty. Attach additional pages if needed. Note: The applicant is responsible for notifying the Project Manager of any changes in ownership during the time the application is being processed or considered. Changes in ownership are to be given to the Project Manager atreast thirty days prlor to any public hearing on the subject property. Failure to provide accurate and current ownership information'could result in a delay in the hearing process. Additional pages attached rves r No

Corporate/Partnership Name (type or print): Corporate/Partnership Name (type or print):

rowner r TenanlJLessee r Owner r TenantfLessee

Street Address: Street Address:

City/State/Zip: City/State/Zip:

Phone No: Fax No: Phone No: Fax No:

Name of Corporate Officer/Partner (type or print): Name of Corporate Officer/Partner (type or print):

TiUe {type or print): Title (type or print):

Signature: Date: Signature: Date:

Corporate/Partnership Name (type or print): Corporate/Partnership Name (type or print):

r Owner r TenantJLessee r Owner r TenanVLessee


City/State/Zfp:' City/State/Zip:


Name of Corporate Officer/Partner (type or print): Name of Corporate Officer/Partner (type or print):

Title (type or print): Title (type or print):

Signature: Date: Signature: Date:

eorporate!P,artnershlp Name (tYpe or prlntj: Corporate/Partnership Name (type or print):

r Owner r Tenant/Lessee rowner r Tenantllessee


City/State/Zip: City/State/Zip:


Name of Corporate Officer/Partner (type or pnn!]; Name of Corporate Officer/Partner (type or print):

Title (type or print): T"'

Signature: Date: Date:

Page 2 of 2

I

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO

October 28, 2005

Mr. Jon Dominv Dominy and Associates 2150 \V. Washington Street, Suite 303 San Diego, California 92110

Dear Mr. Dominy:

Subject: Substantial Conformance Determination No. 63365, Altman Residence, Project No. 63365

On February 2, 2005, you submitted a request to the City of San Diego for a Substantial Conformance Review, for modifications proposed for the previously approved "Friedman Residence", CDP/SCR No. 91-0270. The applicant subsequently submitted a Geology Report to reconfirm the Coastal Bluff setback which aided City Staff in the Substantial Conformance Review detennination.

City staff has review·ed the submitted plans as representing changes consistent with the approved 'Exhibit A' plans in File No. 91-0270 and has deemed the changes in substantial conformity. These plans will be stamped as new exhibits for those changes only.

Ifyou have questions, please contact me at telephone number (619) 446-5142.

Sincerely,

~'CP Development Project Mari ger Development Services partment

Development Services MS 501 • Son Diego, CA 92101·4155

p~~(~9~ 44~f4~4

:ecoral.n~·-t:equeerce:'" oy .. • ~1(~1 .xnaiJ. -.to: , Per:nut Intake :itv of\ m Diego 'l;;,crm tn.:;r' Depa:c:tmen t

.:z: C Stre~t, ld. S. 4C 1n Diego, CA 92101-3864

........ ATTACHMENT15.

.:(. G87

' COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT/SENSITIVE COASTAL RESOURCE PERMIT NO. 91-0270

FRIEDMAN RESIDENCE PLANNING DIRECTOR

This coastal Development Permit/Sensitive Coastal Resource Pe_rmit is granted by the Planning Director of the City of San Diego to DR. NEIL FRIEDMAN, Individual, Owner/Permittee, pursuant to Sections 105.0201 and 101.0480 of the Municipal Code of the City of san Diego.

1'. Permission is hereby granted to owner/Permittee to construct a Coastal Development located at 9696 La Jolla Farms Road, described as Lots 10 and 11, La Jolla Farms Map No. 3487, in the R-1-20 Zone.

2. The facility shall consist of the following:

a. A 7,000 square-foot addition to an existing 20,600 square-foot single-family home;

b. Landscaping;

c. Off-street parking; and

d. Incidental accessory uses as may be determined incidental and approved by the Planning Director.

3. Not fewer than two (2) off-street parking spaces shall be maintained on the property in the location shown on Exhibit 11A, 11

dated october 7, 1992 1 on file in the office o;f the Planning Department. Parking spaces shall comply with Division 8 of the Zoning Reg1..1.lations of the Municipal Code and shall be permanently maintained and not converted for any other use. Parking space dimensions shall conform to Zoning Ordinance standards. Parking areas shall be clearly marked at all times. Landscaping located in any parking area shall be permanently maintained and not converted for any other use.

4. No permit shall be granted nor shall any activity authorized by this permit be conducted on the premises until:

a. The Permittee signs and returns the permit to the Planning Department;

b. The Coastal Development Permit is recorded in the office of the county Recorder.

5. Before issuance of any building permits, complete grading and working drawings shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. Plans shall be in substantial conformity to

.f-<,. .... -~-~ ....... ---~~--· ....... ....-.:-···~-...._ .. , .............. 1 ~ ~ t._"t';tl ;t ?-"':.~ :' ~h if t7 ~! 1

l tJ t··v~. ~ ;,,,:A ?. f\~ I·':, L. ! l { f ......... ~-,.... . .,.....-.......... ~ .... -::--·~-.. -· .... ·~~ ...... ....... ;_....., ..... _ .......... _,. ___ ... ~- .. i

Page 2 of 24

...... AITACHMENTt5

688 Page 2

Exhibit 11A, ~~ dated October 7, 1992 1 on file in the off ice of the Planning Department. No change, modifications or alterations shall be made unless appropriate applications or amendment of this permit shall have been granted.

6. ·Before issuance of any grading or building permits, a complete landscape plan, including a permanent irrigation system, shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. The Plans shall be in substantial conformity to Exhibit 11A1

11 dated October 7, 1992, on file in the office of the Planning Department. Approved planting shall be installed before issuance of any occupancy permit on any building. such planting shall not be modified or altered unless this permit has been amended and is to be maintained in a disease, weed and litter free condition at all times.

7. The property .included within this coastal Development shall be used only for the purposes and under the terms and conditions set forth in this permit unless authorized by the Planning Director or the permit has been revoked by the City of Ban Diego.

8. This Coastal Development/Sensitive Coastal Resource permit may be canceled or revoked if there is a material breach or default in any of the conditions of this permit. Cancellation or revocation may be instituted by the city of san Diego or Permittee.

9. This Coastal Development Permit is a covenant running with the subject property and shall be binding upon the Permittee and any successor or successors, and the interests of any successor shall be subject to each and every condition set out in this permit and all referenced documents.

10. Details of all exterior illumination shall be submitted prior to issuance of Building Permits. All outdoor lighting shall be so shaded and adjusted that the light is directed to fall on the same premises as light sources are located.

11. No structure or improvement or portion thereof shall be placed or erected and no grading shall be undertaken within forty (40) feet of any point along the coastal bluff edge which is shown on the approved plan Exhibit 11 Atr dated October 7, 1992.

12. Landscaping materials shall be installed and maintained ·so as to assure that neither during growing stages nor upon reaching maturity will such materials obstruct vievls to and along· the ocean and other scenic coastal areas from public vantage points.

Page 3 of 24

................ ATI8CJ:lMENI 15 .. .

689 Page 3

13. Native and. other drought-tolerant plant species shall be utilized in order to minimize irrigation requirements and to reduce potential slide hazards due to overwatering of the bluffs. Detailed landscaping plans shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of grading perrnits.

14. All drainage from the site shall be directed away from any blurf edges in accordance with the approved preliminary drainage plan Exhibit 11A, 11 dated October 7, 1992.

15. An open space easement acceptable to the City of san Diego Planning Department shall be recorded for the bluff face, between the toe of the existing bluff and the bluff edge prior to issuance of grading and building permits as shown on the approved plan Exhibit 11 A:H dated October 7, 1992.

16. Assumption df Risk. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits or Grading Permits, the applicant (and landowner) shall execute· and record a deed restriction, in a form and content acceptable to the Planning Directorr or designated representative, which shall provide: (a) that the applicant understands that the site may be subject to extraordinary hazard from and the applicant assumes the liability from such hazardsi and (b) that the applicant unconditionally waives any claim of liability on the part of the (jurisdiction) and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the (jurisdiction) and its advisors relative to the {jurisdiction's) approval of the project for any damage due to natural hazards. ·

17. The document shall run with the landrbinding all successors and assigns and shall be recorded free of prior liens which the Planning Director, or designated representative determines may affect the interest being conveyed and free of any other encumbrances which may affect said interest.

18. Unless appealed this Coastal Development Permit shall become effective on the eleventh working day following receipt by the Coastal Com:missi6n of the Notice of Final Action. This condition shall be included in all permits appealable to the State Coastal Commission.

19. This coastal Development Permit must be utilized within 36 months after the effective date. Failure to utilize the permit within 36 months will automatically void the permit unless an extension of time has been granted as set forth in Section 105.0216 of the Municipal Code.

Page 4 of 24

................................ .. AIIACHMENTJ5

69 0 Page 4

20. In the event that any condition of this Permit, on a legal challenge by the Owner/Permittee of this Permit, i~ found or held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unenforceable or unreasonable, this Permit shall be void. However, in the event that a challenge pertaining to future growth management requirements is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unenforceable or unreasonable, the Planning.· Director

· shall have the right, bUt not the obligation, to review this Permit to confirm that the purpose and intent of the original approval will be maintained.

APPROVED by the Planning Director of the City of San Diego on october 7, ~992.

[P4.S]P:ERMITS:7597

Page 5 of 24

')

ATTACHMENT t5.

( 691

PLANNING DIRECTOR RESOLUTION NO. 9544

C .. Page 5

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT/SENSITIVE COASTAL RESOURCE PERMIT NO. 9~-0270

WHEREAS 1 DR. NEIL FRIEDMAN, Individual, Owner/Permittee, filed an application for a Coastal Development Permit and Sensitive Coastal Resource Permit to develop subject property located at 9696 Farms Road within the La Jolla Community Planning area, described as Lots 10 and 11 1 La Jolla Farms Map No. 3487, in the R-1-20 Zone; and

WHEREAS, on October 7, 1992, the Planning Director of the city o'f San Diego considered Coastal Development Permit No. 91-0270 and Sensitive Coastal Resource permit pursuant to Sections 105.0201 and 101.0480 of tqe Municipal Code of the City of San Diegoi NOW 1

THEREFORE,

BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Director of the City of San Diego as follows:

1. That the Planning Director adopts the following written Findings, dated October 7, 1992.

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FINDINGS:

a. The proposed development will not encroach upon any existing physical accessway legally utilized by the public or any proposed public accessway identified in an adopted LCP Land Use Plan; nor will it obstruct views to and along the ocean and other scenic coastal areas from public vantage points. · The project proposes an addition to an existing home and is not located on or adjacent to any existing public accessway. Project development would not obstruct views from public vantage points.

b. The proposed development will not adversely affect marine resources, environmentally sensitive areas, or archaeological or paleontological resources. The proposed addition will be located on a previously disturbed area of the site. Project development would not encroach on marine resources, environmentally sensitive areas of archaeological or paleontological resources. ThUs 1 project development would not adversely affect these resources.

c. The proposed development will comply with the requirements related to biologically sensitive lands and significant prehistoric and historic resources as set forth in the

f-.. .. ..,.~"~"""""'" ......... ~-..-.... ~,.....,,-t~'tl< ... n~-.,.:~ ... ~ .. ·~~L·.e~~;.·:.-· ... ;.v,..1

il f!""\ f1, 1 r,~ ~· 'h • 11 1 ~ ~~.J\!"~•r\'"r¥l•.J'·~ •

; v~:t- !1 t -• .. ;.., .. A ~ ~ ··;: .f'"· ... ~. ; ,... !

L .................. ""··----··---····-· ·._ .. _,J>.

Page 6 of 24

ATIACHMENTt5 ....

692 Page 6

Resource Protection Ordinance 1 Chapter X, Section 101.0462 of the San Diego Municipal Code, unless by the terms of the Resource Protection Ordinance, it is exempted therefrom. The project site is not known to contain prehistoric or historic resources and is. exempt from the Resource Protection Ordinance.

d. The proposed development will not adversely affect recreational or visitor-serving facilities or coastal scenic resources. The proposed addition site does not contain existing or planned.recreational facilities, visitor-serving facilities or coastal scenic resources. Thus, the proposed development ivill not adversely affect these resources.

e. The proposed development will be sited and designed to prevent adverse impacts to environmentally sensitive habitats and .scenic resources located in adjacent parks and recreation areas, and will provide adequate buffer areas to protect such resources. The proposed addition will.be sited on the site next to the existing home or an area of the site which has been previously graded and developed with lawn area. Development is not adjacent to any existing or planned park or recreation area. Thus, the proposed development will not adversely affect these resources.

f. The proposed development will minimize the alterations of natural landforms and will not result in undue risks from geologic and erosional forces ahd/or flood and fire hazards. The proposed addition includes a minimal amount of grading and the grading and drainage design was repommended by a geotechnical report to reduce undue geologic and erosional risks. ';['he landscape plan includes.a brush management plan to reduce any fire hazard. The project site is located on a high coastal bluff and is not subject to flooding.

g~ The proposed development will be visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas, and where feasible, tvill restore and enhance visual quality in visually degraded areas. The proposed addition is to a ;Large custom estate home in an area of other large·estate homes. The proposed development is similar in scale and design to existing development in the area.

h. The proposed development ·will conform with the General Plan, the Local Coastal Program, and any other applicable adopted plans and programs. The proposed development is located in the La Jolla Community Plan area and is designated Very Low Density Residential Land Use, with which the proposed single- family home addition is consistent. The addition is

Page 7 of 24

ATIAGHMENTt5

693 (_

Page 7

also consistent with the development standards of the R-1-20 Zone.

SENSITIVE COASTAL RESOURCE

a. The proposed development will be sited, designed, and constructed to minimizer if not preclude, adverse impacts upon sensitive coastal resources and environmentally sensitive areas. The project is sited on the same area where the existing home is located and should preclude any adverse impacts upon sensitive coastal and environmentally sensitive areas.

b. The proposed development will not encroach upon any existing physical accessvJay legally utilized by the public or any proposed public assessway identified in an adopted community plan; nor will it obstruct views to and along the ocean and other scenic'coastal areas from public vantage points. The project proposes to add on to an existing horne and the site is not located on or adjacent to any existing public accessway. Project development would not obstruct views from public vantage points.

c. The proposed development will minimize the alteration of natural landforms and will not'result in undue risk from geologic and erosional forces andjor flood and fire hazards. The project proposes minimal grading and includes grading and drainage design recommended by a geotechnical report to reduce undue geologic and erosional risks. The project design includes a brush management plan to reduce any fire hazard. The project site is located on a high coastal bluff and is.not subject to flooding.

d. The proposed development will not contribute to the erosion of public beaches or adversely impact local shoreline sand supply. Shoreline protective works will be designed to be therninimurn necessary to adequately protect existing principal structures, to reduce beach consu:rnption and to minimize shoreline encroachment, The project is located up on top of a coastal bluff above the adjacent beach and is designed through the landscape plan and the drainage plan to reduce and prevent drainage toward the coastal bluff.

e. The proposed development will not adversely affect the General Plan, the Local Coastal Program, or any other applicable adopted plans and programs. The proposed development is located in the La Jolla Community Plan area and is designed Very Low Density Residential. The proposed

Page 8 of 24

..... ATTACHMENT t5

694 ( Page 8

development is consistent with this designated and meets the development stand~rds of the R-1-20 Zone.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based on the findings hereinbefore adopted by the Planning Director 1 Coastal Development Pennit No. 91~0270 and Sensitive Coastal Resource Permit is hereby GRANTED to Dr.Neil Friedman, owner/Permittee, in the form and with the terms and conditions as set forth in coastal Development Permit No. 91-0270 and Sensitive coastal Resource Permit, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.

~~Mr:~ ~ert Karch~ ~

·JPeuior Planner

Adopted on: October 7, 1992 By a vote of:

[P45}PERM!TS:7597

,---~~..,.,,~_.,._....,.,.. . ....,+....,~ .... ~·~-w--,..,.. ... ,., .. , .... ,,.. ~ .......... "''"~.--·· ····-.. -~

I cut)· ~ ..... i· t r-·~~. f ¥ .. ~ l\ ~ i I ,~.;;; ' : .,, ji ~ "' I.,;, ·t I. I _ 1 U ~ ~ """"'..; J < \\ If \,, ~ • ..,.

L:.-~__......~ ................... H...__._ ................. ~~-'f~~if

Page 9 of 24

l?age 9

RESOLUTION NUMBER R-~9~5~4~3 ______ _

ADOPTED ON October 7 ~ 1992

WHEREAS, on March 13, 1991, Dr, Neil Friedman submitted an application to the Planning Department for a Coastal Development Permit and Sensitive Coastal Resource Permit; and

WHEREAS, the permit was set for a public hearing to be condu~ted by the Planning Director of the City of San Diego; and

WHEREAS, the issue was heard by the Planning Director on Oct. 7, 1992. ; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Director of the City of San Diego considered the issues discussed in Negative Decla~~tion No. 91-0270; NOW THEREFORE,

BE IT RESOLVED, .bY the Planning Director of the City of San Diego, that it is hereby certified that Negative Declaration No. 91-0270 has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) as amended, and the state

. guidelines thereto (California Administrative Code Section 15000 et seq.}, and that the information contained in said report, toge.ther with any comments received during the public review process, has been reviewed and considered by the Planning Director.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Director finds, based upon the Initial Study and any comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and therefore, that said Negative Declaration is hereby approved.

By:

Page 10 of 24

....... AIIACHMEf'.JTJo Page 10

ALL-PURPOSE CERTIFICATE

Type/Number of Document ·=C=D=P~~~

Date of Approval October 7, 1992

STATE OF CALIFORNIA d?/ /j~/ /

~~IT/·0£--~ COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

Robyt Karch, sen-for P lanne:r ~f

on 'mr1Ad 9. L99.3 before rne 1 BARBARA J. HUBBARD (Notary Public), personally app~bert Karch, senior Planner of the Planning Department of the city of san Diego, personally known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) isjare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that hefshejthey executed the sa!rte in hisjherjtheir capacity(ies), and that by his(herjtheir signature{s) on the instrument the person{s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

(Seal}

PERMITTEE(S) SIGNATURE/NOTARIZATION:

TH. E UNDER .. ·SIGNED PERM. 1IT~EE S) 1 BY EXECUTION THEREOF, .. AGREES T. 0 EACH AND EVERY CONDITION OF THIS PE I . .AlND PROMISES TO PERFORM EACH AND EVERY OBLIGATION OF

PERMITTEW~HEREUN . ~~ .

Signact vue_ 1~ Signed t/'- · Typed Na e

STATE OF&~~ 1

COUNTY OF 62~~~ On ~v-~--I!J'! If 7"3 befqre me, Q~,_.r .-LC .. QL (Name of Notary Public) personally appeared ~ 4: .. -~~~----.i/·r . · = . , personally known to me (o:r~evocl ~e ;:ke --etJl the ba-s~:fl sa:tisfacto~) to be the person (jf{) whose ~~(.1{) '%:3) re subscribed to the. w~f instru~ent and ackn. owled.ged to. lJ~.th. a~~. ·.V·s srhe./the~··. executed the same. J..n~.hJ. 'jherjt .. h.e~r authorized capacity(~), an'Cfthat by. is herjtheir signature~ on the instrument the person~(, or the entity pon behalf of \vhich the person~ acted, executed the instrument. ·

lr"~·- -·-··-~ ......... -~,----~········--. -~- •. - ...... ~

() Ft ( c: ~ r-j£ ./11 L .. ' "-'""<-..... ~ ....... - ... ._ _,..,. ........... ,._ ___ ,._ .... , .... ,, ·~--..... ---......... _. ................ ~,.;

(Seal) WITNESS my CJ. ·, . nd and .offJ4ia.~ 1. seal.

Signature ./';,--/~~ ~""-" //

Page 11 of 24

(

Recording Requested By and ) when Recorded Return to: )

) City of San Diego ) PLANNING DEPARTMENT ) 202 C Street - l!th Floor ) San Diegot CA 92101 ) Attn: Glen Garga.s )

)

..... AIIACHMENT .. 15

"( 69?

Space Above for Recorder's Use

OPEN SPACE EASEMENT AND DEED RESTRICTION

'THIS OPEN ~PACE E~SEMENT A~DEED RESTRICTION (hereinafter nBasementtr) is made this ·. . \ , 199~ by Neil A. Friedman and Joann Friedman, husba · hertina:rter collectively referred to as "'Grantor").

I. WHEREAS, Grantor is the legal o;.mer of a fee interest of certain real property located in the County of San Diego, State of California and described Exhibit A attached hereto (hereinaf'ter nthe Property"); and

II. WHEREASt all of the Property is located within the costal zone as defined in Section 30103 of the California Public Resources Code (hereinafter referred to as the "California Coastal Act of 197611 ); and

III. WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Coastal Act of of 1976 1 the City bas adopted a Local Coastal Plan which implements the California Coastal Act of 1976; and

IV. HHEREAS, pursuant to the Local Coastal Plan, Coastal Development Permit No. 91-0270 (hereinafter llPermit 11 ) was granted on October 7 1 19921 by the City of San Diego subject to the following condition!

_ 15-· An _open space easement acceptable to- the- C:i ty -of' San Diego -Planning Department shall be recorded for the bluff face, between the toe of the existing bluff and the bluff edge prior to issuance of grading and building permits as shown on the approved plan Exhibit A dated October 71 1992

v. H"HEREAS, the City, acting on behalf of the citizens of the City of San Diego and pursuant to the Local Coastal Plan, granted the Permit to the Grantor upon condition (hereinafter ntbe Condition 11 ) requiring inter alia that the Grantor record an open space easement over the Property and agrees to restrict development on and use of the Property so as to preserve the open-space and sceriic values present on the property and so as to prevent the adverse direct and cumulative effects on coastal resources which could occur if the Property were not restricted in accordance with this Offer; and

Page 12 of 24

..... ... AIIACHMENTt5 ... 2 of B

c

VI. WHEREAS, the City has placed the Condition on the permit because a finding must be made under Municipal Code Section 105.0208 and that in the ·absence of the protections provided by the Condition said findings could not be made; and

VII. WHEREAS, Grantor has elected to comply with the Condition and execute this Grant so as to enable Grantor to undert~~e the development authorized by the permit; and

NOH THEREFORE, in consideration of the above and the mutual benefit and conditions set forth herein 1 the substantial public benefits for the protection of coastal resources to be derived, the preservation of the Property in openspace uses and the granting of the Permit to the owner by the City, Grantor hereby grants to the City of San Diego an open-space easement in gross and in perpetuity for the preservation of scenic qualities and environmentally sensitive areas over that certain portion of the Property between the toe of the existing bluff .and the bluff edge, specifically delineat~d in Exhibit 11 A11 of Permit No. 91-0270 dated October 7, 1992, on file in the office of Planning D~partment and attached hereto as Exhibit B (hereinafter the nprotected Land11 ); and

This Easement and Deed Restriction subjects the Property to the following termst conditionst and restrictions which shall be effective from the time of recordation of this instrument.

1. USE OF THE PROPERTY. The use of the Protected Land shall be permanently limited to natural open space for preservation of scenic qualities and environmentally sensitive areas.

No ttdevelopmenttt as that wor•d is generally defined or as specifically defined in the Hunioipal Code Section 105.0203.B. 1 incorporated herein by this reference and a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit c, including but not limited to, removal of trees and other major or native vegetation, grading, paving, or installation of structures such as signs, buildings, fences or similar above-ground structures, shall occur or be allowed on the Protected Land with the exception of the following subject to applicable governmental regulatory requirements:

(a) the removal of hazardous subtances or conditions or diseased plants or t.rees;

(b) the removal of any vegetation which constitutes or contributes to a fire hazard to residential use of neighboring properties, and which vegetation lies within 100 feet of existing or permitted residential developmentj

(c) the installation or repair of underground utility lines and septic systems, so long as put back into substantially prior condition.

2. RIGHT OF ENTRY The Grantee or its agent may enter onto the Property, to ascertain whether the use restrictions set forth above are being observed, at times reasonably acceptable to 'the Grantor. The general public shall have no right to enter on to the open space easement area~

Page 13 of 24

ATIACHMENTt5.

3 of 8

(

3· BENEFIT AND BURDEN This Easement and Deed Restriction shall run with and burden the Property, and all obligations, terms, conditions and restrictions bereby imposed shall be deemed to be covenants and restrictions running with the land and shall be effective limitations on the use of the Property from the date of recordation of this document and shall bind the Grantor and all successors and assigns. This easement and Deed Restriction shall benefit the City of San Diego.

4. INSURANCE The owner agrees to maintain extended coverage homeownersr insurance with the City of San Diego named as an additional insured.

5. CONSTRUCTION OF VALIDITY if any provision of this document is held to be invalid or for any reason becomes unenforceable, no other provision shall be thereby affected or impaired.

6. ENFORCEMENT Any act or any conveyancet contract, or authorization whether written or oral by the Grantor which uses or would cause to be used or would permit use of the Protected Land contrary to the terms of this Easement and Deed Restriction will b'e deemed a breach hereof. The Grantee may bring any action in court ne.cessary to enforce this Easement and Deed Restriction including, but not limited to, injunction to terminate a breaching activity, and to force the restoration of all damage done by such activity, or an action to enforce the terms and provision hereof by specific performance. It is understood and agreed that the Grantee may pursue any appropriate legal and equitable remedies. The Grantee shall have sole discretion to determine under what circumstances an action to enforce the terms and conditions of this Easement and Deed Restriction shall be brought in law or in equity. Any forbearance on the part of the Grantee to enforce the terms and provisions hereof in the event of a breach shall not be deemed a waiver of Grantee's rights regarding any subsequent or continuing breach. The prevailing party in any legal or equitable action to enforce the provisions of this Easement and Deed Restriction shall be entitled to remibur.sement from the other party of reasonable costs and attorney's fees.

7• TAXES AND ASSESSMENT. Grantor agrees to pay or cause to be paid all real property taxes and assessments levied or assessed against the Property.

8. MAINTENANCE The Grantee shall not be obligated to maintainj improve, or otherwise expend any funds in connection with the Property or any interest or easement created by the Easement and Deed Restriction. All costs and expenses for such maintenance, improvement use, or possession shall be borne by the Grantor, except for costs incurred by Grantee for monitoring compliance Hith the terms of this easement.

9. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGHS. The terms, covenants,conditions exceptions, obligations and reservations contained in the Easement and Deed Restriciton shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of

Page 14 of 24

AIIACHM~NIJ5

4 of 8 c ?00

both the Grantor and the Grantee, whether voluntary or involuntary.

State of California )

County of (fJ--lt'-4-/ ~

On This ;:.-4:: da;ofl~ """?' 1991 before me CJ.~..u: (]L 7~ tY /

a Notary Public, personally appeared Neil A. Friedman and JoAnn Frie~man

personally known to rne (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, ~

to be the persons whose nameSis subscribed to this instrument.

Page 15 of 24

OFFICLli.L SEAL JAfl SI. JOHN

NOTABYPUSUC .CAJ.ffOilN!A OMNGE COU!<TY

ll>f CM1r11, Expires Jan." 21.1994

~~ .ATJACHMENTtS

c 5 of 8

701

EXHIBIT .A

Lot 10 and 11 of La Jolla Farms subdivision map No: 3407 Accessors Parcel No: 342-061-09

Page 16 of 24

EXHIBIT B

PROTECTED LAND

Page 17 of 24

r'1( 0 2.·

n .. AIIACHMENTJ5 0 OJ: lj

(' ..

~· .·(

Page 1B~i24

AJJACuME . J::'L ... LI. . .. .. NTt5 .

( 3 ' ' J.

'" "'>:. ~ i

~· !'S ~£

'· ' f\

7 of a 'll l

t2 1\ >!'

~ I ~

. AITAGHMENTJ5 . ..

c· 8 of 8

704

EXHIBIT C

MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 105.0203.B.

Development. On land, in or under water, the placement or erection or any solid material or structure; the discharge or disposal of any dredged material or of any gaseous, liquidt solid, or thermal waste; the grading, :removing, dredging, mining, or extraction of any material; the change in the density, or intensity of use o.f land, including, but not limited to the subdivision of land pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (commencing with section 65410 of the government Code) and any other division of land, including lot splits; change in intensity of use of water, or of access thereto; the construction 1

reconstruction, demolition or alteration of the size of any structure, including any facility of any private, publict or municipal utility; and the removal or harvesting of major vegetation other than for agricultural purposes; kelp harvesting.

Page 19 of 24

RECORDING REQUESTED BY: ) City of San Diego ) PLA~JNING DEPARTMEN'r ) 202 C Street - 4th Floor ) San Diego, CA 92i01 ) ·

) vlHEN RECORDED MAIL . TO: ) City of San Diego ) PLANNING DEPARTMENT ) 202 C Street - 4th Floor ) San Diego, CA 92101 )

)

(

705

ATTACHMENT 15

Space Above For Recorder's Use

ASSUMPTION OF THE RISK

I. WHEREAS, Neil Friedman and JoAnn Friedman, hereinafter collectively referred to as 11 0wners11 , are the record owners of the certain real property described in Exhibit 11 An, attached hereto; and

II. WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the Coastal Zone as defined in 30103 of the California Public Resources Code, hereinafte.r referred to as the "California Costal Act of' 1976;n and

III. WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Coastal Act of 1976, the City has adopted a Local Coastal Plan which implements the California Coastal Act of 1976; and

IV. H'HEREAS, pursuant td the LQoal Coastal Plan 1 coastal development permit number 91-0270, hereinafter referred to as the 11Permit11 was granted on october 7, 1992, by the City, which Permit is herein incorporated by reference; and

.v. 'HHEREAS, the permit is subject to terms and conditions including, but not limited to, the following condition:

16. Assumption of Risk. l?rior to Issuance of Building Permits or Grading Permits, the applicant (and landowner) shall execute and record a deed restriction, in a form and content acceptable to the Planning Director, or designated representative, which shall provide; (a) that the applicant understands that the site may be subject to extraordinary hazard rrom and the applicant assumes the liability from such hazardsj and (b)- that the applicant unconditionally waives any claim of liability on the part of the City of San Diego and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of San Diego and its advisors r'elative to the City of San Diego's approval of the project for any damage due to natural hazards.

Page 20 of 24

\.._.,

1-z !L! ::'E

~ O· w g !;2 "' . 0 <· lL 0 !"l :;;:

J

0 ii

ti' w 0

(

} s.s.

personally .known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory

evider~ce) to be the person(s) whose name(s} is~ubscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me thatlie/she/~xecuted the same in his/her&horized capaclty0es), and that1}yhis/hertfhej;:) slgnature(s) on the hlStrument fhe person{s), or the entity upon b~ of which the person(s).acted, executed the instrument.

WITNESS my hand and official seal

SigMit"' Cl~~ ff~ != ?.i.O? I~Q1' -z::;: ).

STATE OF CALIFORNIA /1} COUNTY OF {.Y..t....;r~-.r<----=

/ } s.s.

before me,

-l ~· d.; ·' ?"1~c~...-....... .----personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory

evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) i~bscribed to the

within instrument and acknowledged to me that helsh~xecuted the same in his/he&thorized capacity(ies), and thati?yhisJhertthei[) signature(s) on the mstrument the person(s), or the entity upon biffi'eJf

of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

WITNESS my hand and o!Jicial seal

(]~~ , 4i :-. QL

..... ............................................................... AITACHMENT15

(

707

OFFICIAL SEAL JMiSL JOHil

NOTARY FUSUC ·CALIFORNIA ORANG£ COUNTI

My Cemm. EtphsJan. 21, 1994

FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP

Page 21 of 24

AITACHMENTJ5 .....

( ( \ 706

VI. WHEREAS, the City found that but for the impostion of the above condition the proposed development could not be found consistent with the provisions of the California Coastal Act of 1976 and that a pe~mit could therefore not have been granted; and

VII. WHEREAS, Owners have elected to comply with the conditions imposed by the Permit and execute this Deed Restriction so as to enable Owners to undertake the development authorized by the Permit.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the granting of the Permit to the Owners by the City, the Owners hereby irrevocably covenant with the City that there be and hereby is created the following restriction on the use and enjoyment of of said Property, to be attached to and become a part of the deed to the property. The undersigned 01~ers, for themselves and for their assigns and successors in interest, covenant and agree that:

1. The Owners understand that the site may be subject to extraordinary hazard from numerous landslides and high, steep bluffs, rapid erosion, and minor alluYial valleys and the applicant assumes the liability from such hazards.

2. The Owners unconditionally waive any claim of liability on the part of the City of San Diego, and agree to indemnify and hold the City of San Diego, and its advisors harmless relative to the City of San Diego's approval of the project for which the Permit is granted, and for any damage due to natural hazards • The Owners agree to maintain extended coverage homeowners' insurance with the City of San Diego named as an additional insured.

3. Attorneys Fees. In any action or proceeding arising to protect, interpret or enforce the deed restriction 1 obligations or covenants granted or created hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys fees and costs.

4. Severability. In the event any term, covenant, condition, provision or agreement herein contained is held to be invalid or void by any court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity of any such term, covenant, condition, provision or agreement shall in no way affect any other term, covenant, condition, provision or agreement herein contained.

is hereby agreed to by Owners and deemed to be a land, and shall bind Owners and all or

DATED: r /

Page 22 of 24

1-

( ./ . \

CITY OF SAN DIEGO

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION

DATE: october 20, 1992

The following project is located within the City of san Diego Coastal Zone. A Coastal Permit application for the project has been acted upon as follows:

APPLICA'.r!ON NUMBER: 91-0270

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Addition to existing single...,family residence.

PROJECT Nl'..ME: Friedman Residence

LOCATION: 9696 La Jolla Farms Road

APPLICANT'S NAME/ADDRESS: Dr. Neil Friedman 17752 Beach Boulevard Huntington Beach, CA 92647

FINAL ACTION: ..JL APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS

ACTION BY: ..JL.. Planning Director

ACTION DATE: October 7, 1992

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: See attached permit.

FINDINGS: See attached resolution.

K Appealable to the Coastal Commission pursuant to.Coastal Act Section 30603. An aggrieved person may appeal this decision to the coastal Commission onlv a:fter a decis;on by the Citv council and within ten ( 10) working days following Coastal Commission receipt .of this notice. Applicants will be notified l:Jy the Coastal Commission as to the date the commission's appeal period will conclude. Appeals must l:Je in writing to the appropriate Coastal Commission District office.

California Coastal commission San Diego Area office · 3111 camino del Rio ~orth suite 2oo San Diego, CA 92108-1725 Phone (619) 521-8036

cc: california Coastal commission

Project Planner:

NFAS[P47]4253

Glenn Gargas (619) 236-6115 HS 4C

Page 23 of 24

c CITY OF SMI DIEGO PLANNING DEPARnlENT CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING

::. 202 C Street

ATTAGHMENit5 ... ~ ..

( '~.

:: IA.;::::-;-:-.~-o=-~J-7-o------. PROJE CT r-!UHBER -----.:.;-~----;=;-~.,-.,------PROJECT NAME _ ___;_ft:.:.-;_!JZ._· d:....:.1 _0;C{_f\ _ ___:.p_·_S_t_c~_~__:; _ _;:;· ;___

~ ''' Diogo, CA 92101

hG~~~-~;~~~w APPLICATION ~I

CHECK ALL PERMITS YOU. ARE APPLYING FOR

0 CLASS lFICATION OF USE OCOHPREHENS!VE SIGN PLAN 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERf1IT 0 CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION PERMIT 0 DEMOLITl0!-1 PERH1T 0 ENCROACHHENT PERMIT 0 FLOOR AREA RATIO EXCEPTION PERl1IT 0 HElGHT LlMIT EXCEPTION .. 0 HILLSIDE REVIEW PERMIT 0 LAND DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 0 LEASE OF CITY PROPERTY

0 MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIAL PWilT 0 PLANNED COMMERC !AL DEVELOPHENT 0 PLANNED DISTRICT 0 PLANNED tNDUSTRIAL DEVELOP!·IENT 0 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 0 REZONING TO 0 TENTATIVE S0BDIVIS!ON _._ __ 0 PARCEL HAP ' 0 STREET VACATION 0 VARIANCE 0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

~HER (SPEC! FY) ----.,-.--

LOa~o.l De:tt<Lo ~1"1\~± HAS ENVI RONMDITAL ANALYSIS BEEN DON£ ON THE SITE BEFORE

0 YES 0 NO

EQD NO. (if yes) ~------

FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY EXACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: WHEN APPLICABLE, recognizes that add:~ l deposits may be required if PLEASE FURtiiSH HErES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRI PT!ONS

1

perm1t pr~ng ex e~xceed the original deposit. (Attach if insufficient space)

,SIGNATURE: ~ 1--.v - ltl r { v. . Lo+ (o ..J II -Jc h ('- frc-m1.J. Refund or bill: 0 Agent 0"0wner 0 Other

N!\ME . Vr. t--\"G;\ rr\edwv~n n~ry ·.3fS'f

ADDRESS {th.unhc:r) (Street)

UJ 11171..: 'Beo.c:lll D\vJ. ·w H~-h~:~ 'B~ ~ 1 (t;. ~~!' (p'f/ ~;11~~~Ez ~ \4tto

PROPERTY LOCAHON: ~.dt2 - CJ0 I lf-

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL# ~o9 t: Jol)Ci fb.'t'MS. Bd. :z; --'

~ner STREET ADDRESS 'J (pc.I (e Lo. cr: STATUS (Check One) 0 Optionee 0 Lessee

N s E@SIOE OF L .... ..So\\q 'f<>-Y'!'V-? RJ. w 0.. LEGAL STATU~ (Check One)

BETWEEN !z\({4; ~ol,J !3J • 0 CORPORATION: WHAT STATE lNCORPORl\TED

AND

0 PARTNERSHIP 0 LIMITED 0 GENERAL TOTAL SITE AREA: NET AREA:

.\2t INDIVIDUAL THIS SPACE TO BE USED BY TflE PLANNlNO OEPARTHENT f- Ni'lll\E

Da~heAy _1

(.) l;;o.ry /rrck (t-eeT z; .. ;3 .. t7; < 01\TB RBCBIVBD: 1-' z ADDRES'J¥ (Nwnbe:i') (Street)

0 94-1 &Iv-e~.cre 1)r. E.Q.D. NO. n 51\EBT NO,

0 fl(rP .. . c;-3 LANilERT COORDINATES P'4· r 1 • ((</

' CITY AND S'l'I\TE '"' ZIP 1TELEPJONE -

f- ~V\ \'Yiq·rco:;, . (&~ . 9'2-0&q c,.-r1 7Z1- CC(Z 3 COUNCIL DISTRICT, ()(_ Cl';N SUS Tl~ACT {Jt3. ;;;_

z w

CONTACT PE80N (Px:in~ !Ae-<1- ZON.E DIS'l'RlCT SCllOOL D!S'l'P,lC1' (..') b?c \Jr flrc «( .. O..f'/ I !.('? -y COK!-lUN!T'{ PLJ\lol

NAME I J EXlSTING ZONE{S)

>- Dr. Net\ 'fy-\eJM<=<n DklELLING UNtTS: 1\TTF\CHED-- DETACIIEO-- HUL'l'I --

t: ADDRESS (Numher) (Street.) ' / COASTl•L UJYES 0 NO NO. Of LOTS

w 111?'2. -B:Ao~ olvd. 0.. HiPACT REPOS:f 0 'tf.S "'tv NO 0 C!TY AND STilT!': ZlP ~~ELEPilON£ ,

OEVELOPHEHT )\RBI\: t;:'~(UJmJINIZEO [1 PLMlNE:O [1 FUTUM 0: ~~A~n beC\C~ C<t .'l'z..4>"fl 1J"\)cotz..-1420 n. ._ ... , •• •*•-. ·~·· .,._,. ••• ' ••• J"'~ ... ··~ -~ ........ •'"-·•~·~··~ -.~'"· ~···~'· ~~·- ~•t• ;,••• .... ~~.~· l.J_

STATUS ('chi!ck One) f9'\jymer l'ERMIT TYPE !IE: I\ RING bi\TE; i\CTXON !W:

0 {U)f 0: LEGAL STATUS (Check One) w 0 CORPORAT!ON' WNAT Slft]:ORATED z 0 PART~ERSHIP 0 Lfl).l)f 0 GENERAl 3: 0 }:(INDIVI~ .~ ) _.-) :IGNhTlJRE -/ '

1 .. \)

-

Page 24 of 24

Project Areas

Existing Residence:

1st floor 2nd floor garage

subtotal

maintenance I security (to be removed)

Total

Proposed:

Residence 1st Floor 2nd Floor Garage New home gym New lounge

subtotal

Guest Unit New garage New guest house New guest garage New home office

subtotal

Total

17,724 sq.ft. 3,199 sq. ft. 2,010 sq. ft.

22,933 sq.ft.

1,286 sq.ft.

24,219 sq.ft.

17,724 sq.ft. 3,199 sq. ft. 2,010 sq. ft. 1,026 sq. ft. 1,164 sq. ft.

25,123 sq.ft.

3,623 sq.ft. 1,439sq.ft. 446 sq.ft. 1,100 sq. ft.

6,608 sq. ft.

31,731 sq.ft.

Stormwater Quality Notes Construction BMP's

1. This project shall comply with all requirements of the state permit; california regional water quality control board, san diego region, order no. 2001.01 npdes. cas01 0875 and the city of san diego land development code.

2. Contractor to provide the minimum requirements for construction best management practices:

3. Sufficient bmps must be installed to prevent silt, mud or other construction debris from being tracked into the adjacent street(s) or storm water conveyance systems due to construction vehicles or any other construction activity. the contractor shall be responsible for cleaning any such debris that may be in the street at the end of each work day or after a storm event that causes a breech in the installed construction bmps.

4. All stock piles of uncompacted soil and/or building materials that are intended to be left unprotected for a period greater than seven calendar days are to be provided with erosion and sediment controls. such soil must be protected each day when the probability of rain is 40% or greater.

5. A concrete washout shall be provided on all projects which propose the construciton of any concrete improvements that are to be poured in place on the site.

6. All erosiontsediment control devices shall be maintained in working order at all times.

7. All slopes that are created or disturbed by construction activity must be protected against erosion and sediment transport at all times.

8. The storage of all construction materials and equipment must be protected against any potential release of pollutants into the environment.

Sheet Index 001 project information 002 site plan- existing 003 site plan- proposed 004 MHPA easement exhibit 005 sensitive bluff easement exhibit 006 ftoor plan- level1 007 floor planlevel 2 008 roof plan- proposed 009 elevations 010 Sections

C-1 existing topography and boundary C-2 proposed grading C-3 water pollution control plan

Project Team

Owner: Steve and Lisa Altman 9696 La Jolla Farms Rd. San Diego, CA 92037

Architect domusstudio architecture 2150 W. Washington suite 303 San Diego, CA 92110 619.692.9393 CONTACT: Jon Dominyx 12 [email protected]

Civil: Ranch Coastal Engineering 1635 S. Rancho Santa Fe Road, Suite 206 San Marcos, CA 92078 760.510.3152 CONTACT: Doug Logan [email protected]

Geotechnical: CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND ENGINEERING, INC. 2414 Vineyard #G Escondido, CA 92029 760.746.4955 760.746.9806 FAX CONTACT: Dan Math [email protected]

Environmental: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 858.484.0915 858.679.9896 FAX CONTACT: Brian Smith [email protected]

13 Total Sheets

9696 La Jolla Farms Road La Jolla, California

Amendment to Coastal Development permit no. 91-0270 Neighborhood development permit application

Project information

Project Address 9696 La Jolla Fanns road La Jolla, CA 92037

Assessors Parcel# 342-061-09

Legal Description lots 10&11 of La Jolla Farms subdivision, map no. 3487

Existing Zoning RS-1-2

Total Lot Area 3.82 acres (166,423 s.f.)

Sanitation District San Diego

Water District San Diego

School District San Diego school district

Required Setbacks front: 25'-D"

Height Limit

Building Data:

rear: side:

40'-0" Bluff 24'-2" /1 0'-0"

24'/30' feet allowed (21' for accessory structure) 28' feet existing 20' -11" proposed accessory structure 13'- 4" proposed addition

Gross Floor Area: (see site plans for additional area information) 24,219 sq. ft. existing

FAR: ( .45 allowed)

Building Footprint

Lot Coverage:

31,731 sq. ft. proposed

24,219/166,423 = .15 existing 31,731 /166,423 = .19 proposed

21,020 sq. ft. existing 26,759 sq. ft. proposed

21,020/166,423 = .13 existing 28,035/166,423 = .16 proposed

Construction Type: type VB

Occupancy Classification: R-3

Year of construction: 1974 with extensive remodels in 1991 and 2004

Overlay zones: Coastal height limit Coastal (city) Coastal (state) CST-APP Fire brush zones 300' buffer Fire hazard severity zone Parking impact- Beach f Campus f Coastal Residential tandem parking

Geologic Hazard Catagory: 41,51,53

Existing f Proposed hardscape within the front yard setback: F.Y.S.B. = 5,996 s.f. Landscape area = 5,0112 s.f. Paved area = 985 s.f. = 16% < 60%

Project description

Demolition of existing accessory structure and construction of new accessory structure to include garage, guest quarters, storage space and home office. The project scope also includes two additions to the primary structure to include a new home gym and lounge. This project was previously being processed as an SCR but due to new potential archeological resources a COP ammendment has been deemed necessary.

Solar expedite program:

This project will comply with the regulations of San Diego City Council policy 900-14, May 18, 2010. The intent of the project is to provide in excess of 50% of the new electrical load by means of solar electricity.

Climate Change and Sustainable Development goals:

The proposed project will fulfill the goals of the conservation element of the city's general plan through the utilization of solar energy, high efficiency glazing, high efficiency mechanical and lighting systems. The project is also sited and designed to maximize the use of natural daylight and existing coastal breezes.

Vicinity

LA JOLLA VILLAGE DRIVE

w

Page 1 of 10

ATTACHMENT 16

-o C1l 0 a: (/J

E .._ C1l

LL _!!1

"' 0 ~ ' C1l ro _J u c.o ci Ol '5 c.o -,

"' Ol _J

dom usstud ioa rc hi tectu re

diu

2150 West Woshinston, Suite 303 San Dieso, Colifornio 92110

CDP 04 Dec. 2013

CDP 06Jan. 2014

CDP 15 Ape. 2014

CDP 28 Aug. 2014

CDP 18 Mar. 2015

CDP 5Jun. 2015

Team

ProjectNo. 353040

OrawingNo.

001 project information

I

Ill I

Ill I

I

Ill

Ill gj ~

Ill I

Ill

Ill

Ill I I I

I I I

,tt I I I

1 I I

'·' 0

0

"'

existing landscaped yard no work

J ,.

- -,-

/ 40' bluff 1 setback ____________

11

i_1:.._ ______ _

I 25' bluff setback ------

edge of bluff per substancial conformance determination no. 63365. project no. 63365 -------

I (

I l \

,,'/ ,

' ' \

' I I I I I

I /

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I I

I I

I

I ~

', ' '

I I

I I

I

' ' \

I I

/

\ I I I

I

-1- ---1

I I

I I

\\\ MSCP/MHPA ... N

'" boundary line ~

1 I

/

I existing patio. no work ---J--

I I I

I I I

\\\ 1 I I

1 I I

\\\ 1 I I 1 1 I

\\\ 1 I I 1 I\

~ \\ -\\I

I I I

\\

o.,.,~~

\ ,_, •\ <-', <& <Z, .;'<f, i,- 'ho ~~ U:.o "'{, 'n \ \ (tl' ·o <.'1' u <1'

1 1 I

\\\ \I I I\ I

\\\ \\I

\I\

\\\

I I

I I

I I I

I I

\ \

\ I I

/ ,, / '

I

I I

I I

"-......... ,

,

'

/

\ I I I I I I I I

' \ \ \

'

existing pool, no work

' ', - --- - - --- - - -- - - -- L

2oo . OO~

,, ,,

472.57'

24'-2" SIDE YARD SETBACK 10% OF 241'-8" LOT WIDTH

existing sand volleyball court tiAI~UII\,1 ::st:U IU VUIIti)'UI:III O..:uur\

EXISTING RESIDENCE 22,933 S.F.

Page 2 of 10

existing 5ca< Qaraqe 1,617 s.f.

~~~ ~

·"" .:' :.!

(~~

_;:(.:f·j,-<l'

~:::.~·

;:t.d<~~·1

~;'}

r-~- ~·~" \

~:"t¢

~':,?"!'

~~

c~~,.j'''' .;~:i- ,.

"' .,

348

/ 10'·0~ ~INIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK

//

existing residence ATTACHMENT 16

ii

1 ---, ~~----------------------------~

I

I

I 25'·0;~~~~UM'::--\---------,----------------->I.-

_."" YARD SETBACK .

60.95' I i ~------------------~,/· I

1 41~53'

\f.

351

_/

Site Plan Legend

EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN

- EXISTING AREA TO BE REMOVED

\ \ \

Existing building adress number per \ FHPS Policy P-00-6 (UFC 901.4.4) No proposed change.

\

;,

Site plan notes:

\

\

' I

' .. \

1. Nearest bus stop is located at the intersection of La Jolla Shores dr. and North Torrey Pines rd.

2. Nearest fire hydrant is approximaUy 200' east on La Jolla Farms rd .. south side of street

Existing Residence:

1st floo r 2nd floor garage

subtotal


Total

Proposed:


subtotal


subtotal

Total

17,724 sq.ft 3,199 sq.ft. 2,010 sq.ft.

22,933 sq.ft.

1,286 sq.ft.

24,219 sq. ft.

17,724 sq.ft. 3,199 sq. ft. 2,010 sq. ft. 1,026 sq. ft 1,164 sq. ft.

25,123 sq.ft.

3,623 sq.ft. 1,439 sq.ft. 446 sq. ft. 1,100 sq. ft.

6,608 sq. ft.

31,731 stfj

"0 C1l 0 0:: (f)

E ._ C1l

LL

~ "' 0 'E --, ~

C1l ro ....J (.)

(!) .; 0) ~ (!)

"' 0) _J

d o mu ss t ud ioo rc hi lecture

~in

2150 We$t Washington, Suite 303 Son Diego, California 92110

CDP 04 Dec . 2013

CDP 06Jon. 2014

CDP 1SApr.2014

CDP 28 Aug . 2014

CDP 18 Mor . 2015

CDP 5Jun. 2015

Team

ProjactNo. 353040

Drawing No.

002 site plan existing

Site Plan Legend

CD

subtotal


Total

Proposed:


subtotal


subtotal

Total

17,724 sq. ft. 3,199 sq. ft. 2,010 sq. ft.

22,933 sq.ft.

1,286 sq.ft.

24,219 sq.ft.

17,724 sq. ft. 3,199 sq.ft. 2,010 sq.ft. 1,026 sq. ft. 1,164 sq. ft.

25,123 sq. ft.

3,623 sq.ft. 1,439 sq.ft. 446 sq. ft. 1,1 00 sq. ft.

6,608 sq. ft.

31,731 sq.ft.

ATTACHMENT 16 existing SDGE transformer to remain

existing water line and connection, no work.

existing BFPD, no work.

1. Nearest bus stop is located at the intersection of La Jolla Shores dr. and North Torrey Pines rd.

2. Nearest fire hydrant is approximately 200' east on La Jolla Farms rd .. south side of street.

3. All existing landscape outside of building footprint to be protected. Sile is 100% lanscaped, no new landscaping proposed as part of this project.

4. Prior to the issuance of any construction permit. the Owner/Permittee shall incorporate any construction Best Management Practices necessary to comply with Chapter 14, Article 2, Division 1 (Grading Regulations) of the Municipal Code, into the construction plans or specifications. (New Issue)

5. Prior to the issuance of any construction permit, the Owner/Permittee shall submit a Water Pollution Control Plan (WPCP). The WPCP shall be prepared in accordance with the guidelines in Apperx:lix E of the City's Storm Water Standards. (New Issue) Project

6. Street tree calculation - 22T / 30' = 7.56 24" box trees required. There are currently 12trees in the front yard setback, proposed work will not alter this.

7. lighting shall be directed away from the MHPA. and shielded if necessary.

8. No new or unfiltered runoff would occur within the MHPA. Existing dranage system f~ters runoff ti'Yough grassy swales with overflow being pumped back to La Jolla Farms

Road.

9. Prior to the issuance of any construction permit and/or any grourx:l disturbing activity, the Owner/Permittee shall contract with a City of San Diego-certified archaeologist to implement a grading monitoring program to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department and Mitigation Monitoring

CoordinaHon seotkm. EB

"'0 co 0

0::: (f)

E .... co

LL

~ "' 0 .E --, g co ro

.....J 0

<.0 .!§ Ol 1l <.0

"' Ol _J

do mu sst ud ioo rc hi tectu re

din

2150 West Washington, Sv~e 303 Son Diego, California 92110

CDP 04 Dec . 2013

CDP 06 Jon. 2014

CDP 15 Apr. 2014

CDP 28 Aug. 2014

CDP 18 Mar . 2015

CDP 5 Jun . 2015

T~m

ProjectNo. 353040

OfawingNo.

003 site plan proposed

I I I \

EXISTING RESIDENCE

EXISTING 5 CAR GARAGE

new guest suite. home office and garage below

YARD (2) ~~~~ easement exhibit

Site Plan Legend

COVENANT OF EASEMENT AREA WITH EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS I USES TO REMAIN

ATTACHMENT 16

"0 co 0

0::: (/)

E ..... co

lJ..

i!! "' 0 .E --, g co c;; _J u (!) .; Ol ~ (!)

"' Ol _J

d om uut ud ioa rc hi lecture

tu diu

2150 We~l Wo$hingron, Su~e 303 San Diego, California 92110

COP 04 Dec. 2013

COP 06 Jon. 201 4

COP 15 Apr. 20\ 4

COP 28 Aug. 201 4

COP 18 Mar. 20 15

COP 5 Jun. 2015

Project No. J53040

IJJawiogNo.

004 MHPA easement exhibit

I I \

\

EXISTING RESIDENCE

EXISTING 5 CAR GARAGE

AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES.

new guest suite. home offtce and garage below

YARD (2) ~.~~~~~.~ve bluff easement exhibit

Site Plan Legend

COVENANT OF EASEMENT AREA WITH EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS I USES TO REMAIN

ATTACHMENT 16

'0 ro 0

0::: (f)

E ,_ ro

LL

~ "' 0 .E ---, ~ ro ro

.....1 u c.o .!§ O'l :sj c.o

"' O'l ...J

d omu sst ud ioo rc h i tectu re

tudio

2150 West Washington, Su~e 303 Son Diego, CaliFornia 92 110

COP 04 Dec. 2013

COP 06Jon. 2014

COP 15Apr.2014

COP 28 Avg. 2014

COP 18 Mor. 2015

COP 5Jun. 2015

Team

P1ojectNo. 353040

DfawingNo.

005 sensitive

fT\ bluff W easement

exhibit

new gym. 1026 s.f.

CD Level 1 - proposed 1116"• 1'-0"

25'- 0"

new lounge area. 1164 s.f.---____/

\ \

306' - 11 5/16"

' ' ' ' ' ' /

---1..

85' - 5 7116"

Page 6 of 10

' ' ' ' ' ' ' '

line of second r - --floor above ~I

L

I

I

I I

I

I

I

-'

7 I

I L __ _

-----------

I

I

_j

I I

.J

residence. 17,724 s.f.

ATTACHMENT 16

"0 co 0 0:: en E ..... co

LL

.!!1 "' 0 .E -, g co ;;; _J u <!) ,; Ol ~ <!)

"' Ol ...J

domus st udioorc h itecture

tudi o

2 150 West Washington, Suite 303 ScnDiego, Calilornio 92110

CDP 04 Dec. 2013

CDP 06Jon. 2014

CDP IS Apr . 20\4

CDP 28 Aug . 2014

CDP 18 Mer. 2015

CDP SJun. 2015

T~m

Projec!No. 353040

Drawing No .

006 floor planlevel1

i ..

~ \

\ \

\ roof below

\ \

\ \

\

\

180' - 0 1/4"

existing residence. 3,199 s.f_------._

\ \

\

roof below

/\

Page 7 of 10

126'- 11"

roof below

new guest garage

446s.f. ---

ATTACHMENT 16

i ng tool shed, restroom, generator, and caretaker unit to be removed -1,286 s.f_

domussl ud ioa rc n itec lure

2150 West Woshinglon, Su~e 303 Son Diego, Colifornio 92110

COP 04 Dec. 2013

COP 06Jon. 2014

COP 15 Apr. 2014

COP 28 A"9 . 20 14

COP 18 Mar. 20 15

COP 5 Jun. 2015

Project No. 353040

Ora>Mng No.

007 floor plan-

EB level2

\ \

\

\ \

\

\ \

\

\ \ \

\

\ \

\ \

\

T .0. Parapet 360.34

\ \

\

\

T .0 . Parapet 361 .34

\ \

\

\ \

\

\ \

T.O. Parapet 362.34

\ \

\

\ \

\

\ \

\

T.O. Parapet 364.34

T.O. Parapet 360.34

! / /! :I :I . '

/. '' :.

,: .:

! :

photovoltaic panels to be a maximum elevation of 372.5' on horizontal roof surface

T.O. Roof 4;)7000

-

c

Existing hous7rto remain

r r roof of new garage below

T.O. Parapet 360.34

I

ATTACHMENT 16

"'0 ro 0

0:: (j)

E '-ro LL

~ "' 0 .E """') g ro ro _J 0

c.o !§ 0) ~ c.o

"' 0) _J

domu sstud ioa rc hi teet u re

21 SO West WoshingtO!'I , Suite 303 Son Diego, Colif«nio 92110

COP 04 Dec. 2013

COP 06Jon. 2014

COP 15 Apr. 2014

COP 28 Aog . 2014

COP 18 Mar. 2015

COP 5Jun. 2015

T~m

ProjectNo. 353040

Drawing No.

008 /\ roof plan

~~~~~~i?~~~~f~a~n~-~p~r~op~o~s~e~d~----------------------------------------------------------------------~--~~~------------------------------------------------------------------------------~C!7S] proposed Page 8 of 10

\

ATTACHMENT 16

_________ ~~- ~e.!9h_!_ _ _ ____ _____ _ ___ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ stuc~ ='·>::::co::.cO.~~:'S~~:::..s:'" ·;.~:;:;::;;;;;.:;::.::.;;::.-_~::""'=>F- '=-·~--'1.-~....---.=-I------F~=--- - - - - - -t"s'Wcc5'fi~sh.~f;:-andtextur;-----------------,

- -- - j - to match existing house -- - -- - -- -

I ~ Level20 _

1 364

·30

Existing house shown for reference

' l

____ LllL--~1

~~~~~1~~-~-=--~-~-~--=-~--=--~~----~~~~---1

AREA OF PROPOSED WORK J , _________________________ / East 1/16" = 1'-0"

~.§bExistinq Str!d_Ct!:illL___ _ _________________ ______ _

~

~el £_0 __ 364.30

~ P!QPQSed Strugure _____ _ 370.50

~2Q_ 364.30

~ (f)

'3 - -ID-

photovoltaic panels, exact layout pending.

0 ~1~.~~.-~.Accessory Stucture

copper facia and gutter to match existing house

stucco finish, color and texture to match existing house

I l AREA OF PROPOSED WORK J ' / ------s~OO~M~W~~~~~~~htreJ~~~~et----

photovoftaic panels, exact layout pending.

21' above existing grade at proposed building

AREA OF PROPOSED WORK -----------------------------------------------------------------1

Page 9 of 10

Addition to match exis ng parapet height

_ ____ IgpofExisting_St~7cJ~~~ ~ stucco finish, color and texture

__ _!_o ~a_!_cl!_e~st.!£1g_h~s~ ___ ______ _

' \ I I I

AREA OF PROPOSED :

'-------~Q!3.t< _______ )

[]

Existing house behtnd

loung~

--?" .. 0 - ----=--=- - ~v7e6~ G

0 North - Lounge 1/16" = 1'-0"

"0 (1j 0 0:: (/)

E ..... (1j

lL

~ "' 0 .E ---, g (1j -ro _J 0

CD .!i en ~ CD

"' en _J

domusst ud ioo rc h i tec I u re

2 150 We~! Woshingtoo, Su;te 303 Son Diego, California 92110

COP 04 Dec. 201 3

COP 06 Jan . 2014

COP 15Apr. 2014

CDP 28 Aug . 2014

CDP 18Mar.2015

CDP 5Jun. 2015

Team

Projec t No. 353040

Drawing No.

009 elevations

~ existing 369.75

~20_ 364.30

____ ~t-Guest FIOQ! h~

~· 351.00 349.00

~20_ 364.30

~ 349.00

0---MJsti_ng 2nd floor !Q.Of__ _ _ 369.75

~st!.Qg 2nd noor rQOf ___ _ 369.75

---------____ __ ~a:. ~ei~h~ _____ _r _______ _

------- ----

010

Page 10 of 10

__ TQP of Existingj)tructure ~ - - - - - - - - - 2.6,§0_ -

__To11_of Prooosed..§t~7~u~~ G

L

_ _Level2 358.00

__9U..<1St j~~'§~ G

e a.

____lQp q_f_Existing St~tu~ - - - - - - - - - _37_!5.80

~ _____/ v~.vo

guest~~~

-- ~·::i;~~ G

_ _____g_ue~t ~~:%~ G

---- --~~J:~ G

ATTACHMENT 16

-o ro 0 n:: Cfl

E ..... ro lL

~ "' 0 .E

' g ro ro _J (.)

<0 <i (J) '6 <0

..., "' (J) _J

d om us st ud ioa rc h i tec t u re

d io

21 SO West Washington, Suite 303 Son Diego, California 92110

COP 04 Dec. 2013

COP 06Jon. 2014

COP 15 Apr. 2014

COP 28 Aug . 2014

COP 18Mar.2015

COP 5Jun. 2015

T~m

Project No. 353040

Drawing No.

010 Sections

report to the hearing officer - san diego...monitoring program was recommended by the consulting...

Documents