questionnaire balai attach (ip-505+ip-509)

TABLE 1: Operation & Effect Indicators (Ponre-Ponre)

Baseline (2001)Mid-term review

(2007)Target (2014) Actual (Apr 2014) Reasons for the difference between plan, actual

Paddy (rainy season) ha 2,400 3,000 3,749

Paddy (dry season) ha - - 2,157

Maize (rainy season) ha

Maize (dry season) ha

Mungbean ha 266 - 1,294

Groundnut ha 381 1,000 2,157

Paddy (rainy season) ton/season

Paddy (dry season) ton/season

Maize (rainy season) ton/season

Maize (dry season) ton/season

Mungbean ton/season

Groundnut ton/season

Paddy (rainy season) ton / ha / season 2.0 300 3.5

Paddy (dry season) ton / ha / season 3.2 - 3.5

Maize (rainy season) ton / ha / season

Maize (dry season) ton / ha / season

Mungbean ton / ha / season 0.25 - 1.2

Groundnut ton / ha / season 0.35 1.0 1.4

% 41.67 15.6 100

1,000 Rp./year/HH 871 3,326 5,193

ha

ha

ha

% / Year

No of HH

%

%

Rp.mil

Rp.mil /year / HH

Rp.mil /year / HH

This table contains the operation and effect indicators of 3 subprojects: Ponre-Ponre (South Sulawesi), Malaka (East Nusa Tenggara) and Paguyaman (Gorontalo).

Please provide the data in cells. If there is published data and information, please provide them instead.

CROP PRODUCTION

Gross annual average product cost

- 500 2,157

- 1.0 2.0

Beneficiary households

Cropping Intensity

Rate of transferring OM responsibility to WUA

Collection rate of ISF

Annual income increase per farm household

Gross annual average income

Cropping area

Unit Yield

Total agricultural area (3) = (1)+(2)

Non-irrigated area (2)

Irrigated Area (1)

Rate of WUA Formulated

Gross Annual Average Farm Income

TABLE 1: Operation & Effect Indicators (Malaka)




Paddy (dry season) ha 406 1,430 2,667

Maize (rainy season) ha 2,170

Maize (dry season) ha 1,180

Mungbean ha - 768 2,000

Groundnut ha - - 2,500





Mungbean ton/season


Paddy (rainy season) ton / ha / season 2.3 3.0 2.5

Paddy (dry season) ton / ha / season 2.3 3.0 2.6

Maize (rainy season) ton / ha / season 1.6

Maize (dry season) ton / ha / season 1.2

Mungbean ton / ha / season - 0.87 0.84

Groundnut ton / ha / season - - 1.3

% 33.33 83.9 100

1,000 Rp./year/HH 822 - 7,377

ha

ha

ha

% / Year

No of HH

%

%

Rp.mil

Rp.mil /year / HH

Rp.mil /year / HH

- 2.2





Irrigated Area (1)



Cropping Intensity


Unit Yield






Crop production

Cropping area

- 2,333

TABLE 1: Operation & Effect Indicators (Paguyaman)




Paddy (dry season) ha - 512 2,713



Mungbean ha - - -

Groundnut ha - - -





Mungbean ton/season


Paddy (rainy season) ton / ha / season 3.0 3.5-4.0 4.4

Paddy (dry season) ton / ha / season - - 4.6



Mungbean ton / ha / season - - -

Groundnut ton / ha / season - - -

% 75 0 100

1,000 Rp./year/HH 1,024 6,452 3,044

ha

ha

ha

% / Year

No of HH

%

%

Rp.mil

Rp.mil /year / HH

Rp.mil /year / HH

1,942 -

1.0 3.0 -








CROP PRODUCTION


Cropping area

Unit Yield



Irrigated Area (1)



Cropping Intensity

188

TABLE 1: Operation & Effect Indicators

Actual (Apr 2014) Remarks

Paddy (rainy season) ha

Paddy (dry season) ha



Mungbean ha

Groundnut ha





Mungbean ton/season


Paddy (rainy season) ton / ha / season

Paddy (dry season) ton / ha / season



Mungbean ton / ha / season

Groundnut ton / ha / season

%

1,000 Rp./year/HH

ha

ha

ha

% / Year

No of HH

%

%

Rp.mil

Rp.mil /year / HH

Rp.mil /year / HH







Unit Yield


CROP PRODUCTION


Irrigated Area (1)


This table contains the operation and effect indicators and supplemental information. Please provide the data in cells. If

there is published data and information, please provide them instead.

Cropping area


Cropping Intensity

TABLE 2: Basic Data for Re-Calculation of EIRRPlease copy this sheet for all subprojects and provide the data in cells highlighted in yellow color.

(Unit: Rp. million)

(1) (2) (3) (4)=(3)-((1)+(2))

Construction cost

(Financial cost)

Construction cost

(Economic cost)O&M Cost Total Benefit Net Benefit

2000 0

2001 0

2002 0

2003 0

2004 0

2005 0

2006 0

2007 0

2008 0

2009 0

2010 0

2011 0

2012 0

2013 0

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

2023 0

2024 0

2025 0

2026 0

2027 0

2028 0

2029 0

2030 0

2031 0

2032 0

2033 0

2034 0

2035 0

2036 0

2037 0

2038 0

2039 0

2040 0

2041 0

2042 0

2043 0

Note 1 : Please provide the actual data of OM cost from work comencement up to 2013

Note 2: Please provide estimation from 2014 to the end of project life (25 years).

(Q) explain the precondition and assumption for calculation of projection of the O&M costs and revenues after 2014.

Year

Ac

tua

lE

sti

ma

tio

n /

Pre

dic

tio

n

TABLE 21: Plan and Actual Budget and Expenditure for O&M of the Project Facilities

Amount (IDR) Source Amount (IDR) Source Amount (IDR) Source Amount (IDR) Source Amount (IDR) Source Amount (IDR) Source

Operation

Maintenance

others (specify)

Total

Amount (IDR) Source Amount (IDR) Source Amount (IDR) Source Amount (IDR) Source Amount (IDR) Source Amount (IDR) Source

Operation

Maintenance

others (specify)

Total

Please provide the O&M budget and expenditure for the project facilities that constructed and improved under PTSL-II and DISIMP-I. In addition to the amount,

please provide financial sources (organizations).

maintenance activities

2012 2013 2014

Budget Expenditure Budget Expenditure Budget Expenditure

2009

Budget

2010 2011

Expendituremaintenance activities BudgetBudget ExpenditureExpenditure

questionnaire balai attach (ip-505+ip-509)

Documents