prosodic analysis: theoretical value and practical difficulties anne wichmann nicole dehé
TRANSCRIPT
Prosodic analysis:theoretical value and practical difficulties
Anne Wichmann
Nicole Dehé
Prosodic features
Phonological (categorical) Prominence placement Contour type Unit boundaries
Phonetic (gradient) Pitch range Speech rate Voice quality Pause placement
Introduction: role of prosodic analysisPragmatics information structure; speech acts; attitudes;
interaction managementSyntax Mapping between syntactic and prosodic ‘units’ Disambiguation
Comment clauses vs. main clauses (e.g. I think) Scope of adverbials Coordination vs. subordination
Language change (grammaticalisation)Applications – clinical tests (Peppe et al)
Overview of talk
Prosodic analysis
Identifying tonal contours
Identifying boundaries
Implications for practice – authors, reviewers, editors
Identifying tonal contours
fall rise fall-rise rise-fall (British)H* L L* H H* LH L*HL (Autosegmental)
Requests and demands
Please-requests (Wichmann 2004)
And our first \question please H*L
Can I have some nomi\nation forms /please H*LH
‘public’ vs. ‘private use
Halliday & Greaves (2008): Accounting for attitudeWhat happens when you take penicillin?
Identifying units and boundaries Internal definition
presence of a ‘nuclear tone’ External definition
Pauses – convenient identifier (auditorily & automatically) but not reliable
Change in tempo (speeding up on initial unstressed syllables; final lengthening
Change in pitch direction on unstressed syllables Absence of CSPs (assimilation, elision)
Anomalies e.g. reporting clauses (yes, she said)
‘any comprehensive definition of the tone-unit must .. Have recourse to a complementarity of cues’
Crystal (1969: 205)
Yes, she said
Yes [.] she said
● ●
H* L L%
Scope of CC – phrase or clause
But my friend got it I think about twelve years ago(ICE-GB: s1a-071 #90)From Dehé 2009
Scope of CC – phrase or clause
This matter may be defeated on the Queen’s Speech specifically tomorrow and again on uh Monday I think.
Kaltenböck (2010)
Scope of CC – phrase or clause
.. one of the things that begins to happen I think in the seventeen seventies ..
(s2a-057-72) Kaltenböck 2010
Grammaticalisation and prosody Process of semantic change
Assumed to be result of habituation
Consequences (prosodic and segmental)Loss of stress >> segmental attrition
Loss of stress >> prosodic integration
Relating prosody and discourse
from: Dehé & Wichmann (2010); in Functions of Language 17(1): 1-28
14
Speaker B: The voters I think just have an opportunity to stick two fingers up to whoever seems to be on top at the moment (ICE-GB: s1b-029#92)
Relating prosody and discourse
from: Dehé & Wichmann (2010); in Functions of Language 17(1): 1-28
15
Your argument I believe is that it’s died so to speak more in somerealms than in others and crucially that there is something there left which is the basis for renovation <,> (ICE-GB: s1b-028#19)
Relating prosody and discourse
Dehé & Wichmann (2010); in Functions of Language 17(1): 1-28
16
and she uhm <,> uh was quite high up I think cos she had a degree (ICE-GB: s1a-019#248)
Initial I think: main clause or comment clause/adverbial? Prosodic evidence for
Main clause Adverbial Discourse marker
Kaltenböck 2009 Dehe & Wichmann 2010
Initial CCs
Initial CCs
Integrated as Head
I think it’s all jolly good fun
Units and boundaries: cricket
as far as my experience in cricket’s concerned Wilfred I think that any woman who wanted to join the MCC would honestly and genuinely be doing it for the sake of cricket
and their love of the game Kaltenbock 2009 (ex 9)
Units and boundaries: sling mud around Kaltenböck (2009:52):
(4) I think it would be silly just to sling mud around (s1b-022-1 9)
What’s gone wrong I think it would be silly just to sling mud around what’s gone wrong is a ge- a general breakdown of centr[al investment]
I think | it would.. 'What’s gone -wrong | I -think | it would be \silly | just to
'sling \mud around | what’s gone /wrong..…
Summary and discussion
Unreliable Identification of Contours Boundaries
Implications for theory
Implications for practice Status and validity of prosodic evidence Methodologies and review practices