Results of Self Assessment ofLicense Renewal Application

Improved Safety Review Process

Jake ZimmermanJuly 21, 2005

1

Agenda

* Background

* Self Assessment Process

* Results/Recommendations

* Conclusion

2

-- I � - I III

Background

* Improved Safety Review Process

* Why?

* Pilot Plants- Farley- ANO-2- D.C. Cook

.) Self Assessment Process

* Objective

* Methodology & Scope

* Recommendations

4

@' Results/Recommendations

* Communications* Guidance Documents* Staff Documents.* Project Team Composition* Schedule and Resources* Training* Other Areas

5

Communications --

* Enhance internal communications

* Enhance external communications. I -. .

6

. I 1

Guidance Documents

* Project Team Documents

* GALL ReportSRP-LRDraft Regulatory Guide

Staff Documents

* Audit Reports

*Safety Evaluation Reports

'Requests for Additional Information

8

Project Team Composition

* RLEP-B Project Teams

* DE technical support

* Project Manager Support

__ __ _ _ .

..

'till

Schedule/ResourcesWork Assignments for Review of

Aging Management Programs and Aging Management Reviews

V_ ., _ .- ~

Ce- [ .* ~

rr ^*Sj U iRLEP-EMPR .nweirora *DEF1MR.wieweI

11

Training-

* On-the-job

* Refresher

12

U@ Other Areas

* DIPM Methodology Audit

- Exceptions to the GALL Report

* Scoping & Screening

13

Industry Focus

* High quality applications

* Licensee resources

* Responsiveness to staff RAls

14

- - I ,N

Conclusion

* Improved process is a success

* Implementation of the recommendations

* Improved effectiveness and efficiency

1s

Kathy WeaverIMPLEMENTATION,

ACTION-PLANFor Recommendations Identified During the Self

Assessment of License Renewal ApplicationImproved Safety Review Process

@' Recommendations

Purpose~of RecommendationsFurther enhance the efficiency and effectiveness ofthe overall license renewal application review process.7 areas of focus* Communications -7 total* Guidance Documents - 5 total

Staff Documents (Audit Reports, SERs, & RAls) -12 total* Project Team Composition - 3 total* Schedule and Resources -12 total* Training -1 total* Other Areas - 3 total

2

1

Initial Evaluation

The Recommendations wereevaluated to determine if thesuggested improvementsinvolved changes to enhance thecurrent processes, guidancedocuments, training practices,or some other refinementsthat would improve our currentperformance.

3

Initial EvaluationDiscussions with applicable staffmembers- to determine underlying issues orareas for improvements- to add clarity to the suggestedimprovements- or obviate the need for furtherimprovements due to actions alreadytaken.

II

Initial Evaluation

Review of the SelfAssessment Report,guidance documents, andany immediate actions"already taken in responseto the recommendations.

5

Status of Implementation ofRecommendations

* 24 Recommendations have alreadybeen implemented.* 19 Recommendations remain openpending further evaluation. These 19recommendations are currently beingtracked to completion and areidentified in the Recommendation andAction Item Cross Reference Table.

6

3

* Questions andlor Comments areappreciated

7

%:,% -�FQ,

0

. License RenewalApplication Review Work

Packages

Dan MerzkeNRR/DRIP/RLEP

Thursday, July 21, 2005

.4.U:

'rI :4

OR9

411;OIAVV IR f,

* * * -0 t�

LRA Review Work.,Packages

* Purpose: Improve efficiency

* How: High consistency with GALL (>90%)> More AMR line items reviewed by audit team> Common "material/environmen/aging effect/AMP"

combinations should need only one review'> More focused review ..

* Same work assignments, different packaging2

I

IIIt

Work PackageA BAssignments

4* .

* Audit team* AMPs consistent with GALL* AMRs consistent with GALL (Notes A-E)* Past precedent

* DIPM - Scoping & Screening Methodology* DSSA - Scoping*DE

* AMPs not consistent with GALL (and emerging issues)* AMRs not consistent with GALL (Notes F-J)* TLAAs (excepitGALL programs) 3-s

p 3

Work PackageIAtit Examples

* Electrical AMRs* Fire Protection AMRs* Concrete AMRs* Copper Alloy in HX AMRs* Metal Components (Structures) AMRs* Non-Metallic Component AMRs

2

o :Work Requests

Work RequestMonticello License Renewal Application

DEIEMEB-BPackage 17- Concrete AMR Une ttems

= Target Date for RAt Inputs DUE to RLEP._-

SC Concurrence Date

SC Narnej KamalV y, Organization DE/EE;

a Target Date for SER Inputs DUE to RLEP-__-

SCConcunence *Date -.

EMEB reviewers will review the Concrete AMR line items with Notes_ F- Jsaded items) for __the Monticello LRA and provide input to the SER.

Example

Component Intended Materiel EnvIronment Aging PA P GALL Vol Table I NotesFunction Effect ' 2

Founrdation. Flood I Rinlorced BelowGrade None None I IIA2 i-h 3 5.1t25 1.506 -Wals (HPCI barder, concrelebulkngl Pressure

boondary

Foundaion, Flood Reinforced Below Grade None None IIl A3.1 h 3 51-25 1. 506Welts (EDO barrier. concretebuihdo) safrey.

reelaed

Foundation. Firebamer, FRenlorced AcrGa None None 111A3 1i 35.1-27 1. 50Wels. Slab, flood concrete..Grout borrder. Greut -(Turbine HEL, .. .' ,Buiding) barrier - I -, t

Foundation, Flood Reonlorced Ai as None None Ill A2.1;i 3 5.1-27, 1. 508Wal., Slab, bamer, concrete.Grouo mlsaitie Grout(Reacror barrier.Buiddrg radiation

stelding 6

I

I I in

I R Example (continued)

* 293 reinforced concrete AMR line items total* 64 reinforced concrete AMR line items

assigned to DE* 14- reinforced concrete, below grade, no

aging effect, I, 506* 13 - reinforced concrete, air/gas, no aging

effect, I, 508. .. . . . .. . . . 7

9 OA

b0*1

U-I

* Z p%

Work Packages

* Hours tracked to determine if efficiencies arebeing realized

* Bottom Line: LRA Review process is stillevolving. Applications consistent with theGALL report should make the safety reviewmore efficient.

8

2)

Plant: A B CI I D E

Type: PWR-DRYSUB PWR-DRYSUB PWR-DRYAMB PWR-ICECND PWR-DRYSUB

NSSS: WEST 3LP WEST 3LP WEST 3LP WEST4LP WEST4LP

NE S&W S&W SSI AEP S&W

am .I4'if nje'c ;.,o f It' i neTr t'';_ :E rg , o' ing af~r' ' o o! ; set rjcion'':_ .YsNm..*<.:.Sfiij6o ae~Jjcln> me~ir ency Core6CoDig Eerg'nc Cofe Co6li~ig>.',. Sfefyije~cifn

_ Pipe Pipe Piping Piping Pipe

Bolting Bolting Closure Bolting| Bolting Bolting

Flow Element Flow Element Flow Element Flow Elements

Pump Casings Pump Casings High Head & RHR Pump Pump casing Pumps____ ___ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___C asings

Accumuiators (and cadding) : Accumulators (and cadding) Safety Injection Tank (including SI Accumulator Tanks_ _ _ _ _ _Accumuatrsaccumulators) S cuuao ak

ValveBodies Valve Bodies Valve Bodies Valve Valves

i Tank 'Tank Refeuling Water Storage Tank (includingL ___________ Tanks accumulators)

Instrument Valve,'.: Instrurment Valve'I_ . Assemblies .'Assemblies

Sump Screens Sump Screens. .

_ Tubing Tubing ' Tubing Tubing

Flow Orifices Flow Orifice j Orifice Restricting Orifices

Pump Seal Coolers

RHR Heat Exchanger Heat Exchanger

._ _ Filter Housing

Flex Hose

Manifold (piping)

Oil Cooler (channel ead) S upLb i olr_ (tubes) _ _St Pump Lube Oil Coolers

L_ . Vortex Breaker

Strainer Housing Filter/Strainers

Thermowell

._ _ SI Pump Lube Oil Reservoirs

0~

0-** 0

Online License RenewalOrientation

www.nrc.govSaiwah Ng __-

July 21, 2005

AJ NRC, H~ne P.sicr nAgternottvmetfrpronieded b yUI lc-'. -". . :- -... tr ., U W

.! _! ft.,. F ,.. _, _ _

Nuciear Reguiatory CommisS,FPottOZ"5n Otally Muar and oalotenugr, ogtia.ao oll.Ca, poet an i.d1anm ci tol ues eta nun,

So*Ra C- dAeQ LMCcdn to flRCs fh Wbb ADAf doconogt [ - '-* Key Topics

Iwooan Frorenon * library hos been restored, Links elsewhere on Iaur-' an. d c _f t 5 - ;the KRC Web Sit, to doatmeotS In ADAMS

Atm~nnn~ni 00 OC ' tony still result it error mesesu be'ausuiae R[ te.. 090' nwnrs t rCa.,tr-.900 1C somne formerly p'blic documents are StillVL 0 yif rPrtsto0 RaooSo -. beWg remslwed.

t~ra~nEnlleona1rtC n ets Pr-r| dVe"Pen :

tto Sd' IOLWIIO..Sol F e '-'r-§,-l - 52 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k -b i 5, -1-**> ;

>:.t_'!:t~t;-. i

- ets News.Releases n'entIu~dtF F-

ll' iX-II'~STC;9v~ uly13 2005

_________ C,^ 1 f Lttr~1rr3er r s -

*; $1*!*L - uly 11 2005

tCnhsPEl~IrftEfc~fl rt Neal.Toeou na-'.ns for Iet.tSnosrtroV*s ", : I-rnotrol Carcf..nn

†k, J .Ii, . IS.-

I In

aj iRC: Reoctor icn-So Ro.I . krmofvInte ngtI U o. proided by USNRC

U.S. Nuclear ReguatciryCn 'I

. -

s..~.r....o Reactor License Renewal

Ms %Eto of Or Ste dq....... the potS,I 160at.,,........X. op, *Sfop k

t-tKQ6.ft

-^)erhs' ~ ~ ~ Ptstn , ;:S;t 31 ~4'Se F Pt} ' 'rdv or L '

CanimorofI .rs, £012or 9OtpLOslt-"',..4 - -.a Reactor Ltcense Relnewa

"*w ~ ~~~~ m Co>.flnl on POOatl Prloerlztf '*tI¶ .lD c a lorwld:t pni*sa-lsscsc

wOp I; oars P..Iroot Prop no

..1*0..cr

AC: Introduction to licnseR RenalaTutorII fMicrosolftInternt Explorer roidedby JSHRC - ;*::: *L * t . :

-:r ED] .e .. .........ol ~t4OX3lw...... L_l f zzt F-" "o ' 14,*'r t5 s#t t '

=11221 Et2 I =1*ICISer I CIM!t

U.S. Nuclear Regulatery Coimissont :

Introduction to License Renewal Tutorial

. - Len s4 154. rvIn rUe-to ctn tht. deTermn,41Xln Sthat C er 3tf~ n l 3ts conrolu. co mn50tana ': ,in3Jte Io.octof saetv anS. ~Ohelrf Cite L13ns LI..5 4eI lit Ret-i npnc{ 00-00git

*-,bst..o* .... tn ~ ItI~t~tljf tht lceonSL baseS, t%.th anpropoe aij:tnenms to address ne.-- -r.,,iacton Wo.m ocustoy pera3t~ng texnenc. Alboon3dI. l:RC 3:tl.onns ha-e pOntoded

so.;i4n 315.T30(0 that tol l hons.,2 basls .5 conntOde to 01e40 an a5cc/0m5 ms e4 of

frto- IIpong ueotoWS

. Do"l Mth reactor 0per4o,0 udofrstand the Iff.s -I Jq. gs14 :n cr 0al Safetr

T i. 1thet.lip.tofOlItl9acreoonne cactonsti atfl . f.1 i~rti atn

rhTb-iosm t.;Locs .. II eplan thQ ent,. rIKcnSj rqn.asal process,

* Er(Ir.,pI-nt3' lp.3-* .. naPlbp

~JHPC.:IReactor License Rene,,&I Saftey i ttcrosort rt.etExpontorepro.ded bytJoR US~c'~:--: :-''-' ,- -- ,-----I,--L

Pk !ftrYe PA..rns TOds ev

O 1r4uJ C.

Signilicant Commission Determinations for License Renewal Rule

Regulatory Process is adecuate for ensuingfl safety ofontrann2 Puants*Issues releant to Current oberatatg Vlants nit be addressed by thre regu~t~or-f

Process and cannd IowanS into the Penod of gtetndtd ooerat~or*Ceornoabbon ftre current kensesgba,,. (CLSf or riert~ct~roY f CLicorplanc.

Mit necr5sarr for a kcense renew~i reMW--. CLS cannes torward nton tre penod of

*Focus of reneeJi renew- is Passine. Iong.ioed Itntunctsl and convoneots and tare.roottd alerg snalyses

*Fccus on rnanojnrg the effeas of Ongi dunusg the venod of eritentd-d cosencon

Scope of Rule (10 CFR 54.4)

S afotry~reated Cistern. scruees. and comrromnts rhd ucon toC re M nt.tetrevtytofPrresanircn(m rit rsgure boundsryZ osure C~pablito to thiA down andS marntain a sate steAdown condoon

Prkentt or trntr~te offset evoonures ccorr-arible to 2SfMt art 10* No-oa~trrettedrebter,,. strumcuss, aVW comPonents weras fatluf coldS pravari

sgut-sy I-lated krt-zw. as autlesed aboayI.*Syste,,%, stnrdjr~s, Sod c~~forientrs rat~ed Len for compliance roth reguatacond:

3 Foe protecton ISA) FR 90.4d).Envonment~sf 0ra~sV,:1 iOn ~CFLRT229

a Pressurzed thermilsthock (11) CFP.-- 61o Antrapated traissest nithout sdoam L10 Cj SO.

-Station 1>I3clout no1y FR 5r283

Contents of an Application

-*---. So. at. tur~g~t f~j!Arl J R 4 2 V I~ --

I~~ct n st ono, ~.00tb nr aaerrrew(0540):

Perform internded luncuon wdtheut mowV rants or ethout a change in

Zj NR aRctorLkens*RenewlSafety kcrohtt IrnternetrplorerproAdedbyLUSRC -7--r ' -.

rk Eot Frv F-de--. -0 H.

iti- grilr ~ rrfter, o. .,.-..5oiO.onhowo.z;*esa~oi.r~s.d ............ ̂ Dtrcr rme. Chtr RAts to trgly that they are ertun re scoe of te hcensertnenra rule, In accordance Kwhts Qfcestn . the joroota mnaSn .wsend nt-n dalt P.Als to the apn7cant and hold conference toss wen c re acOlcantasI tedrKcjl St.af necessary, to danf the Couetsono before the FAIe art

Salary Eaka~ P.oo4ort (SER)0 The SEP. mA pro..de the tedanicat and Itega basis for the N.C's drsoetmon of a

.roenst Renewnt .81 rhcabon. The e of SeVt ShouLd be cordrnen orate eoftthe reQruemef of the rule and consisteen wont the cudance n ft StandardRerrew Plan. The SER h0u0m docuert the bases for the stalrs conciusrons andtwarwdt suffionot mfto,,natn to trtitn the staffs ratonale to sonnson*

fart msroar wets t4licenite apic-bon.o The SEO at alssentled b-y tie orosect moaon ger -thr iooto Iroms the audit, and

ted-a7 staff.

Documet tation of Staff Evaluation

. Aud and reWen reet for the on-sit audits and rare-ntsronc"n * 0trts front the r yn31 vepDrcrors

. Safty Efoataoran ReOort tSER)

Safety Review

Take

ctt Di'r ;orer -~s: 'ue4:ceSeaf, ) 04 13. 2005

I [fillt

RC: Rteactor Llctnse Reeal Rrir Mlkrcosf Irt-.net E.plor prIodtd by Ui31RC II SO l.. it ;,F-,$r~ 'Xlt P

. ;tXbtw§ cs~~. *r .sv0r,^ bd w ,,-ri

Safety Review

1. What is the focus ot a s&utevy teowr

3.MZ r'.n~rrt '.* tUawrp el rs on e, f lirt stnur-ut Jrd r.or.,Vsnb. CS51.P tnajrt otctj St 3and ccm- 'erts

2. Are stru.tures and con POanets relied on for emeroctaV cperatitng Procedures (EOP)within the scope ol license renewal?

a. V.;

3. Why IsIh aooh rn aohgn o- l of '.,tle strudures *nd c-op-nnls no0 Addressed?

Safety Review - Question SCnal; r aPgs.'e S b. No. GAL]s. r : er eX 7:e tJv cW rIj apv alrQ lrm m. eW c'Ie:t.:

esprrctd t0 aorxu once per snt yeors.~ IS Ohio A tlntellnlosled *vgine *nuolsis?

a. tfuIb. 12

S. .usl an aapiC.t meel Inervtl 1nr it the CALL report?

£3

6. Dleroino whether the following stlte.ents .r. true:

.t*r sttltl .s41 the. jVa utnn the Stdared ROeM.t Plan as J.'danCQ n5t tornc.* 're .at.,h t sot tht mnlmabon n rttoA rCgnlatoro sa.a, s 7 a, pSn parat.An

ton et nrpLcats..n.

Summary

* www.nrc.gov- Key Topics / Reactor License Renewal

* Introduction to License Renewal Tutorial- Safety- Inspections- Environmental Impact- Hearing- Decision- Review (Quiz)

July 21. 2005 Reactor Ucense Renewal 8