.A-

Updating License Renewal ]Guidance Documents

August 3, 2004

Jerry DozierLicense Renewal and

Environmental Impacts - B

Overview

1 BackgroundG Schedule& Stakeholder involvement6w Examples of new LR documents**

* **Examples are work in progress and have notreceived formal approval

e Specific questions and discussion onNEI submittals

1

License Renewal GuidanceDocuments

b NUREG-1 800, Standard Review Plan forLicense Renewal Applications for NuclearPower Plants

s NUREG-1 801, Generic Aging LessonsLearned (GALL) Report

f RG 1 .188, Standard Format and Content forApplications to Renew Nuclear power PlantOperating Licenses

Activities since 6/3/04 publicmeeting

f NEI submittal (5/11/04)* Staff complete line by line review of NEI

submittal* Resolving open items

e Additional NEI submittal (39 items on7/30/04)

e Staff comment consolidation from NRCstaff, contractors and national laboratory

. ., .4

2

Activities since 6/3/04 publicmeeting

1& Development of framework/databasesto support project

s Nearing completion of license renewalupdate section for the license renewalwebsite

[~~~~ I311 1 h1 11 1 i1

Tentative Schedule

a September 30, 2004 Preliminary draft updateto GALL and SRP-LR (Rev A) scheduled tobe posted on Web

e November, 2004 Public meeting on GALLand SRP-LR on Web (Rev A)

e January 30, 2005 Publication of draft updateto GALL and SRP-LR (Rev B) with draftreference document that provides justificationfor changes for public comment 6

3

Tentative Schedule

6 February 1, 2005 to March 30, 2005Public Comment Period

1& Public Workshop (1 or 2 day workshopscheduled late February or early Marchduring public comment period)

Tentative Schedule

e; 6/30/2005 Address public commentsand prepare final update to GALL andSRP-LR (Rev C) with Bases andAnalysis of Public Comment NUREG

e 9/30/2005 Final Publication of GALLand SRP-LR (Rev 1) with Bases andPublic Comment NUREG

4

Scope for Update inSeptember 2004 (Phase 1)

ei The GALL update will involvecomponent consolidations, reformatting,correction of errors, and incorporation ofapproved staff positions (Precedents,Interim staff guidance)

f; Corresponding changes to the SRP-LRwill also be developed including updateto incorporate new review approach.

Phase 2

'Phase 2 involves changes such asdevelopment of AMPs, additional approvedstaff positions, and enhancementsPhase 2 Comments evaluated forincorporation in January 2005 version

',Significant benefit will be achieved with phase1, but appropriate consideration will be givento all phase 2 comments

10

5

All HIl qi1l

Stakeholder Involvement inupdating guidance document

t Improvements considered from NEI, NRCstaff, Information Systems Laboratories, Inc.(ISL), and Argonne National Laboratory(ANL)

e We welcome any public comments on thisupdate

s September posting on the website is toprovide early information to all stakeholders

11

Example: Comment Disposition

.>WF _Jaxknh&tX _

L i Cxmrtxiainkaw AMPlnw SoMSz sa S&imcn 211s5rdrexnmt TU VJM.TpiLAl& GVAI-I Add banAI d fku ofdmnid de w jmr dicn in dr Oip udfiz& wd n sm utk Mhrnz ,.einMisiumsnismd frwnGAL iwmAI-Sntss&,ipismofdd: Epadf ~de rEd nd niundm h3.iF kufnwaU und~rdx:p b wdaue n dus

cna tutrnmiq.Nctdw-n w rin N3 shp is iemnE.UIL Eknm TIod Ovn A

1 ss bc(. m ini~ M r~dnm As jinNM451R511521. 1ebu lk aukkhtita udaxiini t1 c~ caiehiujijd - q irdod btatzdfr ES'ppx usdasf6nk.WfluSSin m mut-hsmmdedw %o.

_____ *tntiu hsinus svitkoqt .0 £,amd hinfiv rgd mletutd b tr mA."ULM 9 Lb& u. iw014b ~

ESM. b8M GALL F,12 Al-. hCMr-lb loun GALL M2 Al-c Lm cw & itarnh sES-k bkwt GAIL EM2 Ad tMm d hirMm h c h m

_NQOrc! 7~

12

6

Example GALL 2005Cot...no Sf y Synm IPWR)

l2t St5d_ ed. 1M1,1.9I r Agig Erfnv Aginghn F.Mhr El.ni-nCennl M-hn Pra (AMP)

E-12 Plng. P.Psg S-lss sled Trwd bcsWd crkMzslftu OWVeW XI MW. Nau--. ppm9 sw >Mu 1407 ngkI -Wm. CemUwy.

nemets utd nmks fr h prnTRyI _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Il .beEPR T E-

E-1l Hex dgev aed Cend cyde wal L.. of C2.J Xol N.hIl Skde -Cenend pitsng nd VCyde

cov l oene n CMn.tgWg

E-IS Hd aedwer sled R.w er Mcilmgwd NZo7 Xl NOdtl II&e Los ods i *'OvCydc Cd.ga lS Ge.n"d Pagm; Wmee Syaasnhd.dg Ua Ce. mend.

E&19 Hee adn-a StseIs.sed C cyde wndlg vhnOeX1121. N.d e go. mr piumS. wnd ceele Cled.Cydeaer$ts CmtgWeer

E-20 Hea CedWW S-k. slod Rewow Lols d o mlenil nd ChVwe Xl, NOtdwl S.de nnuleWf Pl9eg Opn. Cyde Cod-g

ueeen cmw. wed wmel S).atnbedudnSg nba ueddmiely

bflesled sm13

13

Example GALL 2005

EP.IS 15 emgipP4 Glam Air-w Uc lkd Nlo Iee-_ ee r -. nd ppeng (EZl)

Note: Scoping/screening andaging management review willcontinue to apply

14

7

GALL 2005 (AddedDefinitions)

G Definitions provided for materials,environments, aging effects, agingmechanisms, and selected components* Cross-system analysis of nomenclature to

assure consistency throughout GALL 2005* Minimization of unnecessary detail and roll-

up of similar terms* Temperature thresholds for certain aging

effects

15

1§~ ~ H i11 1 §1 11 ! 1H 1 1

Example GALL Definitions' Materials --- Steel: Carbon steel, alloy steel, and cast iron (NOT

stainless steel) may be considered the same for several agingeffects. When other aging effects/mechanisms are addressed,materials are specifically mentioned.

* Environment -- Diesel Exhaust: gases, fluids, particulatespresent in a diesel engine exhaust.

s Aging Effect -- Macrofouling: fouling that causes plugging asopposed to fouling that causes loss of heat transfer.

'a Structures & Components -- Piping, piping components, andpiping elements: Examples include piping, fittings, orifices,elements, strainers, pump casing an bowl, valve body, bonnet,nozzles, safe ends, and spray head.

16

8

Changes to SRP-LR

s SRP-LR changes corresponding to theupdate in GALL

s Update of review processG Incorporation of appropriate comments

17

Bases Document

Provides justification for changes to theoriginal GALL Report (July 2001)* General Chapter describing rollup

methodology changes and conversion* Chapter that provides detailed justification

for technical changes and additions

18

9

Bases Document - ConceptualOutline

'Section 1. Analysis of General Changes inUpdated GALL* Generalized component descriptions* Consolidated materials types* Environmental categories & definitions* Aging effects & aging mechanisms* Attributable and traceable to GALL 2001

Section 11. Technical Modifications andAdditions* Justification for technical changes and

modifications

19

11 i iV i a1 , 1 III

Example Material ConversionMelJ Mel l Doiptlb D.rn.I.w IIdGALLV 8. Term teo Eop6-,te to. Ifeg. dfD.1.9, - Speelkte R.L R .". r.. nt 1611erlw Nmmw. r -A&

row... Wtd-od. .u.WlI n Ternnroftnd In qnnUo.Wkom h N-GALL

ol _n.4. obodCAh_ r rll- _VOldrALI.) _CF.IM C. Aoo4if ASHi 'ael. IVB4.3 CASS C.0 .rkr .I.

5 _- , Ssool owi.6 bo.ls. 6 f(CASS). ASTMI _keitk ni.hA743 . AAU4. C-M

j-11 I-U .bl..e ASM A.I., IVBII .- pi.o. N#Cke alloys d r U- * er(el.- 1- Iho d nr lo.d hptIkollo., db. r.hc *r.hl-.Ndig ASM. b.r s 'n., r m 6l.4 4n.

1I2 1.. . *p h. 1..1 _d kid d.lop. lU. .. d.Ire.... I. aGAUL idh . nf .. .- e.- of ei-.

.. io. L b.. 6.. T 1.o..S0eb..ly.Gl;P 1) Ah.lbT. .4..o.. nkkd e_ Lr.1

_1..io1..4-l. ( Iybd..o ) .ya. s-_ ssobh . 5. Al J 600 k 690

58-166 Ni-rCF..-loy._d AS.UE BPVC IVAIA4 Akrh m d..o.*rdf.A-l69Wi-C-C.kl ooy Soeslo jB (p.177.1.lor.. I .4- 1S6.,01)l ral.,d .41,1,n rant nod, 6.. r,

Particular material retained in GALL 2005 when appropniate 2

10

Example Basesns Mul-ee F. E.hr.l. I AE AM?

EP-1 Std at ings Air -or.- t. ( na( uljsawC-. t ra Xl MIt. 'Bntimg bLgntyf(Est) pmg. .rd orek*

Precedent Basis: An approved precedent exists for adding this tnaterial, environuent, aging effect and programcombination hem to the GALL Report As rhon Isn VCSNS SER 3.0.3.7.2. the staff has accepted the position that oss ofmaterial fromgeneral, pitting, and crevice corrosion. exlubited by steel bolting in an outdoor air environnent is properlymianaged by the Bohing integrity AtP which includes periodic ispection of closure bohlting and ensures timely detectionofcorroson anor leakage Thin program proviks reasonable ssuranc that the conmontnt's intended functins will bemaintained within the CLO for the extended pniod of operation.

21

Example Bases (2)

II. Maturt.l Eauemuwv AE AMP

EP-5 Swaet Ceect. N. rkn

Precedent Basis: An approved precedent exists for adding this material, environment, aging effect and program combination item to the GALLReport As shown in VCSNS SER 3.12.4.21.the staffhas acccpted the position that steel in a concrete environment exhibits no aging effect andthat the component or structure wDI therefore retmain capable of perforting its intended functions consistent with the CLE fur the period ofextended operation This conclusion is based on the fact that corrosion ofembedded steel is not significant if the attributes of the concrete designae consistent with AC 31S-63. in particular a low water-to-cement ratio, low permsrability, and adequate air entrainment as cited in NUREG-1557.

22

11

Public Comment NUREG

cn Document will be developed similar to NUREG-1739, "Analysisof Public Comments on the Improved License RenewalGuidance Documents"

v. NRC Staff's analysis of the stakeholders' comments on thelicense renewal guidance documents during the commentperiod* Ucense renewal public workshop* Written comments submitted by NEI* Written comments submitted by various stakeholders

23

1 El11 i 11 1 i1 i 11 1 §

Example from NUREG 1739Table C: Disposition of Written Public Comments (continued)

Commen Item Comment! Basis for NRC DispositionNumber Number Proposed Comment

ChangeNIRS-4 C.3.13 Additionally, the These failures The GALL. SRP-LR. and Draft RG

NRC and Industry and shortfalls can have the benefit of the experiencehave provided no compound to of the staff members who are partLessons learned' adversely Impact of the current process In evaluating

In their GALL the scope and aging for the current license termapproach for accuracy of and also conducted the review ofassessing generic the initial license renewaldemonstrated evaluations within applications. Therefore, lessonsshortfalls. failures the context of learned from the current processand differing license renewal and from an efficiency andprofessional when overlooked effectiveness standpoint Inopinions in the In the evaluation addressing unique issues relatedcurrent process program of the to license renewal from the firstto evaluate aging adequacy of reviews have been incorporatedfor the current generic aging Into these documents. The GALL,licensing basis. management SRP-LR. and Draft RG have been

programs. revised to address the Issue butnot specifically for this comment.

24

12

License Renewal Guidance UpdateWebsite

G Keep all stakeholders informed aboutschedule and information such asrelevant correspondence, meetingnotices and summaries, NRC publicpresentations (coming soon!)

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/guidance.html

25

Comments

fi Combinations of MEAP where there is noaging management required will still requireaging management review

s Even though GALL will be generalized, whereappropriate, the license renewal applicationmust provide specific component names

' Recent operating experience (Davis Besse,finding on nickel alloy issue) will changesome items in GALL

26

13

Example of 7/30/04 NEI

O EL _IS _ -

A *0 g~A awO..sO

_Q A5 -., S- - -

As X-a-D~-Is.. dM5.4.QFI- .t. ; . * W

1-,1*_1-LP 11 IMr. ______ __ __ I ) __ _ _ I .___ _

5 .. _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ n j ! l

I W _*27

r ._4_A.1 1._ T f

Near Term Path forward

s Preliminary draft update to GALL andSRP-LR on September 30

e Proposed public meeting in November

28

14