preliminary test track experiments

11
1 Preliminary Test Track Experiments April 16, 2004 Motohide Hatanaka, Emily Ma Stanford University

Upload: edena

Post on 10-Feb-2016

57 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Preliminary Test Track Experiments. April 16, 2004 Motohide Hatanaka, Emily Ma Stanford University. Preliminary Test Track Experiments. Goal: Validate simulations and to generate insights to improve on first generation foot design. Focus on three phases of leg trajectory. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Preliminary Test Track Experiments

1

Preliminary Test Track Experiments

April 16, 2004Motohide Hatanaka, Emily Ma

Stanford University

Page 2: Preliminary Test Track Experiments

2

Preliminary Test Track Experiments

Goal: Validate simulations and to generate insights to improve on first generation foot design. Focus on three phases of leg trajectory.Attachment Generate strong contact between claws and surface.

• Timing of attachment• Impact velocity• Orientation angle (compensate for motion in thru-

stroke?)

Through-stroke Ankle compliance – how much and for which axes?Detachment Detachment with least resistance and without breaking

claws.

• Orientation angle• Timing of detachment

Preliminary tests focused on timing of attachment and detachment.

Page 3: Preliminary Test Track Experiments

3

Test Track Coordinates

force plate

foot

Page 4: Preliminary Test Track Experiments

4

Timing of attach/detachment

Page 5: Preliminary Test Track Experiments

5

Observations[all cases]The robot is always pushing itself away from the wall. (-Z)

[early attachment]high lateral pull in (+X)robot pushes itself down at initial contact (-Y)robot pushes itself away from surface at initial contact (-Z)[late attachment]small lateral pull in (+X)[late detachment]lateral push out at detachment (-X)significant pull down or drag (-Y)large kick off away from surface (-Z)[early attachment, late detachment]largest pull down (drag) at detachment (-Y)

Page 6: Preliminary Test Track Experiments

6

DetachmentEarly Nominal Late

Attach

men

tVe

ry E

arly

Early

Nom

inal

Late

Lateral Force: X-direction (+X = pull in)

High pull-in force (+X) after early attachment

Low pull-in force (+X) after late attachment

Lateral push out (-X) at late detachment

6

optimal

Page 7: Preliminary Test Track Experiments

7

DetachmentEarly Nominal Late

Attach

men

tVe

ry E

arly

Early

Nom

inal

Late

Vertical Force: Y-direction (+Y = pull body up)

Robot pushes itself down (-Y) at early attachment

Significant pull down = drag (-Y) at late detachment

7

optimal

Page 8: Preliminary Test Track Experiments

8

DetachmentEarly Nominal Late

Attach

men

tVe

ry E

arly

Early

Nom

inal

Late

Normal Force: Z-direction (+Z = pull body into wall)

Large kick off away from wall (-Z) at late detachment

Robot pushes itself away from wall (-Z) especially at early attachment

8

optimal

Page 9: Preliminary Test Track Experiments

9

Summary of findingsAssuming we want lateral pull in, vertical self push/pull up, and pull into wall, (i.e. +X,+Y,+Z):

• Early attachment is to be avoided for -Y and -Z but useful for +X.

• Late detachment is to be avoided for all parameters.

Page 10: Preliminary Test Track Experiments

10

Next Steps (1)Further analyses with current

setup• Measure or calculate forces and torques at contact point (current contact point is offset from center of the force plate)

• Study the torques• Find out the reasons for the results

obtained (e.g. by closer observation at slower operation rate)

• Look at work generated in a cycle and quantify performance of each setup

Page 11: Preliminary Test Track Experiments

11

Next Steps (2)Experiment modification

• Modify the trajectory to have +Z values to measure claw attachment strength on wall

• Include amplitude as an additional parameter for optimization

• Use pull-up motor to emulate the five legs that are not there

• Identify control parameters to match ideal force & torque profiles derived from biology.