organised data on eli lilly

Upload: nitesh-agarwal

Post on 06-Apr-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    1/17

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    2/17

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    3/17

    Lilly and the Rest

    Rank 04 [03 Rank] Company & Headquarte 2004 Global Sales ($bil

    Pfizer

    1[1] New York, NY 46.133

    GlaxoSmithKline

    2[2] London, England 31.377

    Sanofi-Aventis

    3[17/5] Paris, France 30.919

    Johnson & Johnson

    4[4] New Brunswick, NJ 22.128

    Merck

    5[3] Whitehouse Station, NJ 21.493

    Lilly

    11[10] Indianapolis, IN 13.059

    Roche

    15[16] Osaka, Japan 8.274

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    4/17

    Change from 2003

    R&D Expenses

    (in $billions) 2004 Top Selling Drugs

    R&D to

    Sales

    Ratio%

    Lilly and The rest

    Lipitor $10.862 billionNorvasc $4.463 billion

    6% 7.52 Zoloft $3.361 billion 16.30

    Seretide/Advair $4.503 billion

    Avandia $2.042 billion

    5% 5.195 Seroxat/Paxil $1.945 billion 16.56

    Lovenox $2.38 billion

    Plavix $2.17 billion

    12% 9.31 Allegra $1.87 billionProcrit/Eprex $3.589 billion

    Risperdal $3.050 billion

    13% 5.203 Remicade $2.145 billion 23.51

    Zocor $5.2 billion

    Fosamax $3.2 billion

    -4% 4.01 Cozaar/Hyzaar $2.8 billion

    Nexium $3.8 billion

    Seroquel $2.02 billion

    4% 2.69 Zyprexa $4.4 billion 20.60

    12% 1.223 Actos $1.676 billion 14.78

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    5/17

    Ranking of Companies according to stage of Alliance Deals

    company Early Stage Clinical Advanced

    Abbot labs 9 13 1

    Amgen 1 14 14

    Astra Zeneca 6 12 6

    Beohringer Ingelhelm 15 1 3

    Bristol-Myers Squibb 13 7 2GlaxoSmithKline 10 2 13

    J&J 4 11 12

    Lilly 12 5 5

    Merck 2 15 7

    Novaratis 3 6 15

    Pfizer 7 10 9

    Roche 11 4 10

    Sanofi-Aventis 8 8 8

    Takeda 14 3 4

    Wyeth 5 9 11

    disribution of alliance deals by stages

    proportion

    company early stage clinical advanced clinical

    Takeda 28% 43% 28%

    Beohringer Ing 22% 47% 31%

    Amgen 81% 9% 9%

    Roche 38% 42% 20%

    Lilly 35% 37% 28%Abbot labs 44% 15% 41%

    Wyeth 49% 33% 18%

    Bristol-Myers 32% 34% 35%

    Novaratis 58% 37% 5%

    Astra Zeneca 47% 27% 25%

    Merck 76% 1% 23%

    J&J 58% 28% 14%

    Sanofi-Aventis 45% 33% 22%

    GlaxoSmithKli 41% 46% 13%

    Pfizer 46% 32% 22%

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    6/17

    Ranking of Companies according to stage of Alliance Deals

    RANK ACCORDING TO % of Inlicencing

    Rank Company

    1 Takeda

    2 Bristol-Myers Squibb

    3 Hoffmann-La Roche

    4 Pfizer

    5 Abbott6 Novartis

    7 Schering AG

    8 Chiron

    9 Johnson & Johnson

    10 Lilly

    11 Sankyo

    12 Akzo Nobel

    13 GlaxoSmithKline

    14 Merck & Co.

    15 Genzyme

    16 Sanofi-Aventis17 Wyeth

    18 Amgen

    19 AstraZeneca

    20 Lexicon Genetics

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16 Early Stage

    Clinical

    Advanced

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    7/17

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    8/17

    IN-LICENSING OF DRUGS BY LARGE PHARMA

    Total R&D Own Drugs In-Licensing

    In Licencing as

    Percentage of Total

    1 Sanofi-Aventis 221 151 70 31.67

    2 GlaxoSmithKline 172 105 67 38.95

    3 Hoffmann-La Roche 140 72 68 48.57

    4 Johnson & Johnson 117 68 49 41.88

    5 Merck & Co. 112 71 41 36.61

    6 Pfizer 112 61 51 45.54

    7 Novartis 110 61 49 44.55

    8 AstraZeneca 104 80 24 23.08

    9 Wyeth 90 62 28 31.11

    10 Bristol-Myers Squibb 82 38 44 53.6611 Lilly 75 45 30 40.00

    12 Abbott 66 36 30 45.45

    13 Schering AG 61 35 26 42.62

    14 Genzyme 56 37 19 33.93

    15 Lexicon Genetics 49 49 0 0.00

    16 Sankyo 48 29 19 39.58

    17 Takeda 47 21 26 55.32

    18 Chiron 45 26 19 42.22

    19 Amgen 45 33 12 26.67

    20 Akzo Nobel 43 16 17 39.53

    Notes: Total R&D Drugs refers to the total number of active Research and Developme

    suspended products), as of February 2005.

    Own Drugs refers to the number of drugs originating from each companys own resear

    In-Licensing refers to the number of drugs each company has licensed-in.

    Source: http://www.pharmaprojects.com, accessed October 11, 2005.

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    9/17

    Rank Company

    In Licencing as

    Percentage of

    Total

    1 Takeda 55.32

    2 Bristol-Myers Squibb 53.66

    3 Hoffmann-La Roche 48.57

    4 Pfizer 45.54

    5 Abbott 45.45

    6 Novartis 44.55

    7 Schering AG 42.62

    8 Chiron 42.22

    9 Johnson & Johnson 41.88

    10 Lilly 40.00

    11 Sankyo 39.5812 Akzo Nobel 39.53

    13 GlaxoSmithKline 38.95

    14 Merck & Co. 36.61

    15 Genzyme 33.93

    16 Sanofi-Aventis 31.67

    17 Wyeth 31.11

    18 Amgen 26.67

    19 AstraZeneca 23.08

    20 Lexicon Genetics 0.00

    t (R&D) projects (excluding

    ch.

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    10/17

    LILLY FINANCIALS, 20002004

    (in US$ million)2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

    Net sales 10,862 11,542 11,077 12,582 13,859

    Foreign sales 3,858 4,178 4,495 5,361 6,189Research and development ex 2,019 2,235 2,149 2,350 2,691

    Income from continuing oper 3,859 3,507 3,458 3,261 2,941

    Net income 3,058 2,780 2,707 2,561 1,810

    Year end share price1 93.6 78.54 63.5 70.33 56.75

    Market capitalization 66,709 86,599 89,348 63,970 64.53

    Dividends per share 1 1.06 1.12 1.24 1.36 1.45

    Current assets 7,943 6,939 7,804 8,769 12,836

    Current liabilities 4,961 5,203 5,063 5,561 7,594

    Property and equipment 4,177 4,532 5,293 6,539 7,551

    Total assets 14,691 16,434 19,042 21,688 24,867

    Long-term debt 2,634 3,132 4,358 4,688 4,492

    Shareholder equity 6,047 7,104 8,274 9,765 10,920

    Number of employees 35,700 41,100 43,700 45,000 44,500

    1Share price and dividend per share are in US$.

    Source: Company Annual Reports.

    Market value and share prices sourced from Forbes.com.

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    11/17

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    12/17

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    13/17

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    14/17

    How do we link exhibit 9 and 10?

    How does it help us to look at the experience with alpha, beta and g

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    15/17

    mma

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    16/17

  • 8/2/2019 Organised Data on Eli Lilly

    17/17

    Can we view the dimensions as critical success factors in making an alliance succeed

    What do you see as the purpose of the Spider diagram?

    Can we use this for evaluating the experience with alpha, beta and gamma?