operational excellence indicators as response to cost ... · 1000004 produkt a04 6% 8% 1000005...
TRANSCRIPT
Operational ExcellenceIndicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda Prepared by Joerg Wassenhoven
Jörg Wassenhoven
Director Operational Excellence, OPX
Introduction:
Director Operational Excellence, OPX
Takeda Pharmaceuticals International GmbH
Thurgauerstrasse 130
8152 Glattpark-Opfikon (Zurich)
Switzerland
Mobile +49 (0) 151 14630559
Email [email protected]
2 OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda
3 OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda
4 OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda
5 OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda
Operational Excellence Organisation CCO:
Operations
Exec
Central
OPEX
Functions E
M & others
LATAM
region
Solids
region
Liquids
region
Central OPEX team Master Blackbelts sit on Regional Management teams
Coaching,
training and
mentoring
Coaching,
training and
mentoring Blueprints Repository
Blackbelts at site sit on Management teams
Blackbelts co-ordinate with
Greenbelts & Yellowbelts around active project execution
6 OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda
Regulatory Pressures and Cost Pressures in the Pharmaceutical Industry “
Backround
•On August 2012 CFCD Japan (Takeda corporate finance) has kicked off a Global Capital Management project that covers the world wide Takeda organization in full and requires an Extended Value Stream Mapping approach.
7 OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda
Company
Business Unit
Plant
Department
Equipment
“Regulatory Pressures and Cost Pressures in the Pharmaceutical
Industry “ Demand
Forecast
OEE
KPI Driver Tree
Cost Pressures
COGS
Reduction
Quality Yield/Scrap
Quality Grade
Ca
use
s
OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda
Reduction
Capital
Expenses
Inventory
Optimization
Labour
Utilization
Machine
Capacity
Utilization
Thoughput
time
Production time
Setup Time
Downtime Time
Performance Grade
Availability Grade
8
Ro
ot
Ca
use
s
Business Assessment Process
• The BAP is a universal tool
• Establishes Ownership for management & down to the process level
• Provides Gap Analysis from Current to Future State
• The BAP Generates and Prioritizes an action plan
– Project Portfolio• OpEx Projects
Company
Business Unit• OpEx Projects– Kaizen Events– BB Projects– GB Projects
• Other ProjectsCompany
– Identifies local team initiatives
– Sets a time line for improvements
• Establishes true process understanding
BAP is fast, specific and ties directly linked to the annual targets and
identifies the who, what and when for process improvement
9 OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda
Business Unit
Plant
Department
Equipment
BAP Road Map
OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda10
1
BAP Playbook
Phase I(Alignment)
Phase III(BAP)
Phase II(Plan & Prep)
3-4 Month Prior to BAP 1 -3 month Prior to BAP Day 1 - 2 30-60-90 Day Plan
Phase IV(Post BAP)
�Current EVSM
�Future State EVSM
� Gap Analysis
� Validation to Annual Targets
� Resource Assignments
� 30-60-90 Day Plan
� Resources
� Logistics
� Product Lines
� Takt Time
Future StateOrganizational
Alignment &
Identify Key
Value Streams
Data Collection Project Resourcing
& Implementation
OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda11
� Validation to Annual Targets
� Project Identification
� Project Priority
� 30-60-90 Day Plan
�Project Clusters
� BB Projects
� GB Projects
� Kaizen Events
� Future State EVSM
� Future State
� Throughput Time
� Cycle Time
� Inventory €
� Resource Plan
� Strategy
� Annual Targets
� VOC
� Team ID
� Critical Y
� ROIC
� CTQ
� KPI`s
� Takt Time
� Team Assign.
� Data Checklist
� Data, Data, Data
�Maturity Assessment
� Current State VSM
� Spaghetti Diagram
� C&E Matrix, FMEA
� Defect Data
� Cycle Time Analysis
� Constraint Analysis
Value Streams
Tool Selection/Usage May Vary From One Assessment to Another
Current State
Identification of Key Value Streams
PQ Analysis – initially narrow down opportunities based on volume, value
Demand Segmentation – narrow down further and segment based on volume, variability,
inventory level, quality,…
OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda12
Extended Value Stream MappingGap Analysis & Waste Identification
Lieferant
Produktionsplanung
MRP-System
Artikelnr. Produktbezeichnung Tabletten Tabletten Tabletten Tabletten Tabletten Tabletten Tabletten Tabletten Tabletten Tabletten Tabletten Tabletten
1000001 Produkt A01 5% 2% 1% 1% 2%
1000002 Produkt A02 6% 25% 11% 20% 30% 6% 8% 16%
1000003 Produkt A03 20% 8% 10%
1000004 Produkt A04 6% 8%
1000005 Produkt A05
1000006 Produkt A06 6% 11% 30% 6% 8% 16%
1000007 Produkt A07 1% 6% 6% 3%
1000008 Produkt A08 12% 21% 16% 18% 20%
1000009 Produkt A09 24% 43% 30% 26% 40%
1000010 Produkt A10 27% 14% 36%
1000011 Produkt A11
1000012 Produkt A12
1000013 Produkt A13 3% 5% 3% 7% 10% 7% 2%
1000014 Produkt A14 3% 12% 8% 16% 4% 5% 14% 4%
1000015 Produkt A15 5% 22% 17% 33% 7% 35% 33% 9%
1000016 Produkt A16 2% 6% 3% 6% 9% 9% 2% 17% 3% 11% 9% 3%
1000017 Produkt A17
1000018 Produkt A18 4% 4%
1000019 Produkt A19 6% 25% 11% 20% 30% 35% 8% 38% 9% 35% 16% 10%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
ø Chargen 7,18 16,58 4,00 9,09 5,00 3,33 2,86 12,50 2,63 11,11 2,86 6,25 10,00
Jan_08 Feb_08 Mrz_08 Apr_08 May_08 Jun_08 Jul_08 Dez_08Aug_08 Sep_08 Okt_08 Nov_08
500,00
1000,00
1500,00
2000,00
2500,00
3000,00
3500,00
4000,00
4500,00
5000,00
Tab
l./m
in
WartezeitWartezeit
WIPWIP
2 Kampagnen
10 Chargen
5000000 Tabl./Monat
21 Tage/Monat
8 h/Tag
0,5 h Pause/Tag 10,5 h/Monat
157,5 h/Monat
9450 min/Monat
567000 sek/Monat
5000000 Tabl./Monat
157,5 h/Monat
9450 min/Monat
567000 sek/Monat
31746 Tabl./h
529 Tabl./min
Kundennachfrage
1 Kampagne = 5 Chargen
1 Charge = 500000 Tabl= 100kg API
Kundennachfrage
Verfügbare Arbeitszeit
168 h/Monat
Verfügbare Arbeitszeit
Kundentakt Kalkulation
Kundennachfrage
Verfügbare Arbeitszeit
Kundentakt
Ungenauigkeiten im
„Rolling Forecast“ von
Venezuela
Kunde
Wartezeit
WartezeitWIP
Unter dem
Kundentakt
Nu
r P
rod
ukt
„A
“
OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda13
1 Tonne 5
Chargen
max. 3 Tage
max. 5 Chargen
� Tage
5 Chargen
14 Tage...
20 Tage
IPC
7.5 h/Schicht/MA (exkl.
Pausen)
54.000 sek verfügbar
1 Rüsten für 5 Chargen
1,5 h Rüsten (SOLL)
Rüsten �.. (IST)
SOLL-Fertigungszeit 8 h für 5 Chargen
7.5 h/Schicht/MA (exkl. Pausen)
54.000 sek verfügbar
1 Rüsten für 5 Chargen
SOLL-Fertigungszeit 5 h für 1 Charge
SOLL-Fertigungszeit 25 h für 5
Chargen
SOLL-Rüstzeit 4h
IST-Rüstzeit �..
7.5 h/Schicht/MA (exkl. Pausen)
27.000 sek verfügbar
SOLL-Fertigungszeit 7h/Charge
IST-Fertigungszeit 5.25 h
SOLL-Rüstzeit 11h
IST-Rüstzeit 13.5h; Ende der Kampagne
SOLL-Rüstzeit 2h; IST-Rüstzeit 1.25 h;
zwischen den Chargen
Kilian RTS 23
Tablettenpresse
1 1
0,00
500000 Wiegen Mischen Tablettierung Lackieren
Abfüllung und
Konfektionierung
Abfüllung und
Konfektionierung
h 1,75 10,00 6,50 8,50 19,20 12,87
min 105 600 390 510 1152 772,2
sek 6300 36000 23400 30600 69120 46332
Tabl./h 285714,29 50000,00 76923,08 58823,53 26041,67 38850,04
Tabl./min 4761,90 833,33 1282,05 980,39 434,03 647,50
Tabl./sec 79,37 13,89 21,37 15,29 7,23 10,79
Takt Tabl./h 31746,00 31746,00 31746,00 31746,00 31746,00 31746,00
Takt Tabl./min 529,00 529,00 529,00 529,00 529,00 529,00
Takt Tabl./sek 9,00 9,00 9,00 9,00 9,00 9,00
Taktzeit Kalkulation exkl. Endreinigung
Lackierung
1 1
CT = 510 min
TT = 980 Tabl./min
Wiegen
2 1
CT = 105 min
TT = 4762 Tabl./min
Abfüllung +
Konfektionierung/2
Blister
3 2
CT = 772 min
TT = 647 Tabl./min
CTT = 529 Tabl./min CTT= 529 tabl./min
CTT = 529 Tabl./min
CTT = 529 Tabl./minCTT = 529 Tabl./min
Rechtzeitiger
Bestand von
Fertigprodukten
im Lager
unflexibel
Verfügbarkeit
Verfügbare Zeit 21T x 8h = 168 hPausen 21T x 0,5h = 10,5 h
Rüsten (� %) = ... h
Stillstand = ... hFrei (ca. ..%) = � h
Summe Verfügbarkeit = ... h/m
Verfügbarkeit von ... %
LeistungTheoretisch max. �.. Tabl./h
SOLL-Leistung ..... Tabl./h
IST-Leistung �.. Tabl./hGeplante Leistung .4..%
IST-Leistung 4...%
QualitätVolumen Input �...Tabl
Volumen Output �...Tabl
Qualitätskennziffer 4.%
...
�
�
�
�
�
...
...
�
�
�
�
�
...
Overall Equipment Efficiency
Verfügbarkeit ��%Leistung ��%
Qualitätskennziffer .�...%
OEE=VxLxQ 4....%
WIP
Date
n v
on
alle
n
Pro
du
kte
n
Abfüllung +
Konfektionierung/
1Blister
3 2
CT = 1152 min
TT = 434 Tabl./min
TT = 529 Tabl./min
Kilian RTS 20
Tablettenpresse
1 1
CT = 390 min
TT = 1282 Tabl./min
Mixer
1 1
CT = 600 min
TT = 833 Tabl./min
VerfügbarkeitVerfügbare Zeit 21T x 8h = 168 h
Pausen 21T x 0,5h = 10,5 h
Rüsten (� %) = ... h
Stillstand = ... hFrei (ca. ..%) = � h
Summe Verfügbarkeit = ... h/m
Verfügbarkeit von ... %
LeistungTheoretisch max. �.. Tabl./h
SOLL-Leistung ..... Tabl./h
IST-Leistung �.. Tabl./hGeplante Leistung .4..%
IST-Leistung 4...%
QualitätVolumen Input �...Tabl
Volumen Output �...Tabl
Qualitätskennziffer 4.%
Overall Equipment Efficiency
Verfügbarkeit ��%Leistung ��%
Qualitätskennziffer .�...%
OEE=VxLxQ 4....%
VerfügbarkeitVerfügbare Zeit 21T x 8h = 168 h
Pausen 21T x 0,5h = 10,5 h
Rüsten (� %) = ... h
Stillstand = ... hFrei (ca. ..%) = � h
Summe Verfügbarkeit = ... h/m
Verfügbarkeit von ... %
LeistungTheoretisch max. �.. Tabl./h
SOLL-Leistung ..... Tabl./h
IST-Leistung �.. Tabl./hGeplante Leistung .4..%
IST-Leistung 4...%
QualitätVolumen Input �...Tabl
Volumen Output �...Tabl
Qualitätskennziffer 4.%
Overall Equipment Efficiency
Verfügbarkeit ��%Leistung ��%
Qualitätskennziffer .�...%
OEE=VxLxQ 4....%
VerfügbarkeitVerfügbare Zeit 21T x 8h = 168 h
Pausen 21T x 0,5h = 10,5 h
Rüsten (� %) = ... h
Stillstand = ... hFrei (ca. ..%) = � h
Summe Verfügbarkeit = ... h/m
Verfügbarkeit von ... %
LeistungTheoretisch max. �.. Tabl./h
SOLL-Leistung ..... Tabl./h
IST-Leistung �.. Tabl./hGeplante Leistung .4..%
IST-Leistung 4...%
QualitätVolumen Input �...Tabl
Volumen Output �...Tabl
Qualitätskennziffer 4.%
Overall Equipment Efficiency
Verfügbarkeit ��%Leistung ��%
Qualitätskennziffer .�...%
OEE=VxLxQ 4....%
VerfügbarkeitVerfügbare Zeit 21T x 8h = 168 h
Pausen 21T x 0,5h = 10,5 h
Rüsten (� %) = ... h
Stillstand = ... hFrei (ca. ..%) = � h
Summe Verfügbarkeit = ... h/m
Verfügbarkeit von ... %
LeistungTheoretisch max. �.. Tabl./h
SOLL-Leistung ..... Tabl./h
IST-Leistung �.. Tabl./hGeplante Leistung .4..%
IST-Leistung 4...%
QualitätVolumen Input �...tabl
Volumen Output �...tabl
Qualitätskennziffer 4.%
Overall Equipment Efficiency
Verfügbarkeit ��%Leistung ��%
Qualitätskennziffer .�...%
OEE=VxLxQ 4....%
max. 5 Chargen
� Tage
max. 5 Chargen
� Tage
OEE Standardization
• Blueprints:
– OEE & TEEP available
– Next blueprint under development
OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda14
• Best Practice Sharing / Training
GAMED – How does it work?
Machine PC
Machine PC
Server PC Client PCs
Client/Server
Integration
tabletting Buffer
Production signal from
PLC or sensor (24V)
Controlling Planning
Global
FunctionsVizualisation
OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda
Local
operation
tabletting Buffer
Packaging
Material flow
scrap
good
Low
High
Time
DowntimeProduction ProductionSetting-up
Logon product A
(Terminal or PLC)
Product A
Machine status
Production signal
15
Historical Background
46 Lines 50
60
70
80
90
34 Lines in preparationOranienburg
Brazil
# of Licenses
Radar Screen
Mexico, Cerano, Russia,...Currently covering production lines / machines like
•Filling/packaging lines
•Tabletting lines
•Inspection lines
•BFS machines
•Coating and granulation equipment in progress
OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda16
05/201112/20092007
8 Licences
Linz
5 Pilot Lines Brüssel
Elverum
Singen
Lyszkovice
Roskilde
Today12/2012
46 Lines Brüssel
Elverum
Singen
Lyszkovice
Roskilde
Asker
Oranienburg
10
20
30
40
50
Time
Status January 2013
Request for 59 new
lines within Europe
“coming from theory to practice”
“It’s a kind of Magic”17 OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda
Thank you very much for your attention!Thank you very much for your attention!
OpEx Indicators as response to cost pressures at Takeda18