newconex canadian exploration ltd. › mndmfiles › afri › data › ...discovery was made....
TRANSCRIPT
BELL LAKE 010
RECEIV .-j
OCT 1 5PROJECTS SECTION
REPORT ON THEINDUCED POLARIZATIONAND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
CANADORE OPTION, TELEPHONE LAKESTURGEON LAKE AREA,
PATRICIA MINING DIVISION, ONTARIOFOR
NEwcoNEX CANADIAN EXPLORATION LTD.
McPHAR GEOPHYSICS LIMITED
REPORT ON THE
INDUCED POLARIZATION
AND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
CANADORE OPTION, TELEPHONE LAKE
STURGEON LAKE AREA,
PATRICIA MINING DIVISION, ONTARIO
FOR
NEWCONEX CANADIAN EXPLORATION LTD,
i J
1. INTRODUCTION
At* requested by Mr. Patrick H. Taylor, Vice President of Newconex
Canadian Exploration Ltd., we have carried out an Induced Polariiation and
Resistivity survey on the Canadore Option near Telephone Lake in the
Sturgeon Lake Area of Patricia Mining Division, Ontario.
The claim group is adjacent to the property of Mattagami Lake Mines
Ltd., and New Brunswick Uranium Metals and Mining Limited, on which a
new copper-rinc-sllver discovery is presently being outlined. The geology
of the area is covered by ODM Preliminary Map P670. Several outcrops of
felsic m e t* volcanic rocks occur along the southern portion of Claw Lake and
appear to lie on strike with the sequence in which the Falconbridge-Mattagami
discovery was made.
Previous magnetometer and horiiontal-loop electromagnetic surveys
have been carried out over the property. The purpose of the Induced Polarization
and Resistivity survey was to outline any anomalies which could indicate the
- 2 -
|prceence of base metal eulphide mineralization associated with the underlying
volcanics.
The Burvey was carried out over the following claims, believed to be
owned or held under option by Newconex Canadian Exploration Ltd.
PA 205910 PA 205911 PA 205912 PA 205913 PA 205914 PA 205918 PA 205919 PA 205920 PA 205921 PA 205922 PA 205923 PA 205924 PA 205925 PA 205926 PA 205927
PA 225025 PA 225027 PA 225028 PA 225029
PA 227153 PA 227154 PA 227155 PA 227156 PA 227157 PA 227158 PA 227159 PA 227174 PA 22.7175 PA 227180 PA 227181 PA 227182 PA 227183
PA 227209
2. PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
The Induced Polarisation and Resistivity results are shown on the
following data plots in the manner described in the notes preceding this report.
Line
36 W
40W
44W
48W
52W
56W
60W
Electrode Intorvals
200 feet
ZOO feet
200 feet
200 feet
200 feet
200 feet
200 feet
Dwg.No.
IP 5461-1
IP 5461-2
IP 5461-3
IP 5461-4
IP 5461-5
IP 5461-6
IP 5461-7
- 3 -
Line
64W
68W
(Repeat)
(Extension)
72V/
(Extension)
76W
BOW
84V/
88W
92W
96W
(Extension)
100W
104W
108W
JiTlectrode Intervale
200 fee'
200 met
"00 feet
200 feet
100 feet
200 feet
200 feet
100 feet
200 feet
100 feet
200 feet
ZOO feet
200 feet
100 feet
200 feet
100 feet
200 feet
200 feet
100 feet
200 feet
1 00 feet
?00 feet
100 fc-et
200 feet
D w fi. N o,
IP 5461-8
IP 5461 -9
IP 5461-10
IP 5461 -11
IP 5461-12
IP 5461-13
IP 5461-14
IP 5461-15
IP 5461-16
IP 5461-17
IP 5 461-18
IP 5461-19
IP 5461-20
IP 5461-21
IP 5461-22
IP 5461-23
IP 5461-24
IP 5461-25
IP 5461-26
IP 5461-27
IP 5461-28
IP 5461-29
IP 5461-30
IP 5461-31
ne
112W
116W
120W
124W
128W
152W
136W
Electrode Intervale
200 feet
100 feet
200 feet
100 feet
200 feet
200 feet
200 feet
?00 feet
100 feot
200 feet
L. No.
IP 5461-3?
IP 5461-33
IP 5461-34
IP 5461-35
IP 5461-36
IP 5461-37
IP 5461-38
IP 5461-39
IP 5461-40
IP 5461-41
Also enclosed with this report is Dwg, I. P. P. 4777, a plan map of the
Telephone Lake Grid at a scale of l " - 400'. The definite, probable anil possible
Induced Polarization anomalies are indicated by bars, in the manner shown on
the legend, on this plan map ae well as on the data, plots. These bars represent
the surface projection of the anomalous zones as interpreted from the location
of the transmitter and receiver electrodes when the anomalous values were
measured.
Since the Induced Polarisation measurement is essentially an averaging
process, as are all potential methods, it is frequently difficult to exactly pin
point the source of an anomaly. Certainly, no anomaly can be located with
more accuracy than the electrode interval length; i.e. when using 200* elec
trode intervals the position of a narrow sulphide body can only be determined
to lie between two stations 200' apart. In order to definitely locate, and fully
- S -
evaluate, a narrow, shallow source it if. necessary to uce shorter electrode
intervals. In order to locate source.^ at sor..e depth, largwr electrode interval
must be ueed, with a corresponding Increase in the uncertainties of location.
Therefore, while the centre of the indicated anomaly probably corresponds
fairly w*ll with source, the length of tne indicated anomaly along the line
should not be taken to repreaent the exaci edges of the anomalous material.
The magnetic information nhown on Dwg. I. P. F 1 . 4777 hat been taken
from maps made available by the staff of Newconex Canadian Exploration l td.
3. riSCUSSION OF K I". S D ITS
The resistivities in the area are generally quite high, suggesting
relatively non-poroue, unaltered bedrock. An attempt was made to correlate
the changes in resistivity from line to line, and thereby perhaps delirr.it the
different rock typee; however, the changes in the depth and conductivity of the
overburden have apparently caused the greatest variations in the resistivity
data, and the attempt has been abandoned. It may suffice to say that the very
high apparent resistivities (noted, for example, near BS on Line l 32W and
between l OS and IBS on line 100W) usually correlate with the dense, non-
porous acid volcanic sequences,
As a result of the high resistivity background, the apparent Metal Factor
3values are quit* low. Values greater than 1.0 are above background and, la
most cases, have been marked ae "possible" anomalies. K;any of these weakly
anomalous features follow linear trends and have been correlated into zones.
Each zone will be discussed individually.
- 6 -
IZone A
The zone indicates a shallow, narrow source. It ie best defined and
strongest on Line 52W. On this line a source lees than 200 1 wide appears to
lie within 100' of the surface near 31N. Mnce the frequency effects are not
very high, the strong resistivity low may be caused by a fault or shear zone.
Zone B
This zone suggests a similar narrow, shallow source lying parallel to
Zone A. The apparent resistivities are not quite as low, but the frequency
effects are slightly higher and consequently more indicative of a metallic-
conducting source.
Zone C
The cone correlates well with a weak magnetic feature. There is an
increase in frequency effect as well as a resistivity low. As illustrated by
the Case History in the Appendix, the anomalies could be caused by a shallow
source whose width is much less than the 200* electrode interval.
The source should be detailed with 100' and perhaps even SO' electrode
intervals along Line 68W and Line 72W.
Zone D
This zone correlates with a more prominent magnetic feature. The
most definite response occurs on the data obtained using 100' electrode intervals
on Line 76W. A narrow source within SO 1 of the surface and possibly dipping to
the south is indicated near 18N. The anomaly pattern on Line 72W is more
complex. Compare with the results over a vertical conducting cylinder
(Model Case VI-0. 25-BX-250-a).
Zone E
The zone correlates with the eastern portion of a long, relatively weak
magnetic trend. The strongest K'eta l Factor response coincides with the
strongest magnetic reoponse near 12N on Line 52\v and indicates a narrow
source probably within 100' of the surface. Unfortunately the IP data ie
incomplete.
Zone F
This zone lies on the flank of the came magnetic feature as Zone F,.
The anomaly near l 5N is characterized by a frequency effect high on the data
obtained using 200' electrode inteivals, and by a resistivity low on the data
obtained using 100' electrode intervale. The anomalies suggest a narrow,
metallic-conducting source within 50' of the surface.
Zone G
This zone lies along the western section of the same weak magnetic
trend as Zone E and Zone F. The anomalies are very weak and poorly defined.
They suggest a shallow source.
Zone H
There is no magnetic association with the zone. The anomalies suggest
a possible weak source within 100' of the surface.
Zone I
The zone correlates well with a magnetic trend. The strongest response
occurs near IN on Line 68W and suggests a narrow source at a depth of about 50 1 .
McPHAR GEOPHYSICS LIMITED
Theoretical Induced Polarization and Resistivity Studies
Scale Model Cases
01 23 S S 6 7 B 9 10 II 12 13 IN IS 16 17 IB 19
i-1 .
i-l.
LI.
140 111 lit l U
O l 23 t S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 It IS IS 17 IB 19
i.*.
O -0.1 .0.7,
(fe)o
O l 23 t S 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 W IS 16 11 18 13
1.1 o
(Mf
CUCTHOOC
(Mf)a
01 23 t S 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13 IN IS 16 l? 18 19
^/)/27^} 2 = 5
(Mf) 2 = 7000
(fe)
\ 7\ X\ '
VIIW Or AMOMttOUS Z ON l
*NO lUHVlT (.IKt
-*XOM*L(XlJ 1ONC
t r-4) l)
CASE 1ZI-0-25-DX-250-0
- 8 -
The anomalies to the east are considerably weaker; the resistivity pattern
near 7N on Line 5?.W ie typical of a large, flat-lying conductive sheet (compare
with Model Case VH-0. 0-EU-?.50-a).
Zone J
This zone is weak, and variable in width. It appears to lie parallel and
to the north of two magnetic features. On all lines the source appears* to be
within 100' of the surface.
Zone K
The anomalies are extremely weak, bat the rone correlates with a
magnetic feature and may indicate a nhallow source much narrower than the
ZOO 1 electrode interval (see Appendix).
Zone L
The zone is again weak and poorly defined. There is no direct magnetic
correlation. The zone may indicate a narrow, shallow source.
Zone Jvi
The anomalies are very weak on Line l 04W and Line 108W. They could
be caused by the amount of magnetite required to produce the prominent
magnetic feature near the base line. The high frequency effect value measured
near IS with 200' electrode intervals apparently arose when both the transmitting
dipole and receiving dipole were straddling magnetic dykea. Detailing with 100'
electrode interval* confirmed the freouency effects but failed to reveal any
prominent Metal Factor anomaly.
McPHAR GEOPHYSICS LIMITED
Theoretical Induced Polarization and Resistivity Studies
Scale Model Cases
O t 23 4 S 6 t 9 10 H 12 13 H 15 16 IT 18 19
147
(P/2^r)a
O l 21 H S 6 7 R 9 10 11 12 13 It IS 16 H 18 IS
-o.l
0,1
(fe)o
O l 23 S 5 6 7 t 9 10 II 12 13 11 IS 16 17 IS 13
O.I
(Mf)o
01 2 3 t S E 7 t 3 1 0 II 12 l) 11 li 16 17 18 19
{/V27T)| " 250 {^2^)2=2-5
(Mf ) , * 0
tucmooc cox'iouoMiox
(Mf) 2 * 1 0800
l l C J O " 2 i /o
\ x\ x\ /
PUN vi(* orANOUALOUi ZOIC t HO
lUXVf* 1 1*1
MIT* -lluki'TI
lOTn -HUU'll'
IH" -l|u*iljj
CASE3m-0-0-BU-250-o
9 -
Zone N
The zone is long, and relatively distinct. The strongest response
occurs near 9S on Line l 08W and suggests a source within 100' of the surface.
There is no direct magnetic correlation with the zone.
Zone O
This zone includes the strongest response measured on the property.
The definite anomaly near P5+50S indicates a metallic -conducting source at a
depth less than SO 1 . Relatively strong anomalies on Line 88\v , Line 96VV, and
Lire 11ZW indicate a similar, narrow, shallow source.
There is no magnetic correlation with the zone; however, it is still one
of the most interesting anomalous features on the grid.
Zone P
This cone is short, weak and without magnetic correlation. Nevertheless,
the probable anomaly near 33S indicates what could be * shallow source much
narrower than the 200' electrode interval.
Zone Q
The zone is very weak. The anomalies could be explained by the amount
of magnetite required to produce the associated magnetic response.
Zone R
The strongest section c* the zone coincides with a magnetic anomaly.
Detailing both Line 104W and Line 96W with l OO 1 electrode intervals has
indicated a narrow source within 50' of the surface. The pronounced fre
quency effect high between 46S and 4 BS on Line l 04V/ suggeste the presence of
metallic-conducting mineralization.
- 10 -
Z.one S
The zone is very weak except on Line 132'A, where it suggests a
source within 50' of the surface near 33+50S.
There is no correlating magnetic response.
Zone T
The responue is very weak. The anomalies may indicate a shallow
source much narrower than the electrode interval, as discu&ted in the Appendix.
Again, there appeare to be no magnetic association.
4. SUMMARY AND RE. C O M M E N b A T I O N l-
Mo8t of the anomalies revealed on the grid are extremely weak, .sot one-
of the anomalous zones approaches the magnitude of the response over other
economic deposits in the Immediate area or over other typical, large massive
sulphide ore bodies in volcanic rocks in the Canadian i/hield.
However, there are two rones (Zone O and Zone R) which include definite
anomalies, and which may indicate significant mineralization in narrow widths.
If the EOneb are to be tested, the following inclined drill holes are suggested:
DDH l, passing beneath 25*50t: on line lOOVV at a depth of 100".
E'DH 2 , inclined to north (the deposit appears to dip south) and passing beneath 46+50S on Line l 08Vv at a depth of 100'.
In addition to the above, there are two weak zones (Zone C am! Zone D)
which lie in a particularly interesting geological environment, on strike with
acid volcanic outcrop. The zones, may indicate narrow widths of poorly-
conducting (perhaps high sphalerite - low pyrite) mineralization. The zones
could be tested by the following drill holey;
- n -
DDH 3, passing beneath 23N on Line 68V; at a depth of l 50'. (There is a flight indication that the source dips tc the north).
DDH 4, pa B e ing beneath l 8N on Line 76\V at a depth of 100'. (The source appears to dip to the south).
All the other weak anomalies are considered of little eignlficance as
direct indication* of economic-sized deposits of massive sulphide mineralization.
The anomalies were correlated into zones mainly to act as an aid in establishing
mineralized trends which could perhaps lead to the discovery of depoeito below
the effective depth of penetration for the eurvey (about ?00' or 300 1 for small
deposits).
Jv.cPHAil GEOPHYSICS LIMITED
William H. telton, Geophyeic'.st.
Robert A. Bell, Ceologist.
Dated: May 17,1971
- 12 -
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
PROPERTY i Canadore Option
SPONSOR: Mewconex Canadian ExplorationLtd.
LOCATION: Sturgeon Lake Area
TYPE OF SURVEY: Induced Polarization
OPERATING MAN DAYSi
CONSULTING MAN DAYSi
DRAUGHTING MAN DAYS t
TOTAL MAN DAYSi
183
EQUIVALENT 8 HR. MAN DAYSi 274.
5
H
290, S
MINING DIVISION* Patricia
PROVINCE: Ontario
DATE STARTEDl January 15, 1971
DATE FINISHED: April 4,1971
NUMBER OF STATIONS! 972
NUMBER OF READINGS? 8228
MILES OF LINE SURVEYEDi 32.3
CONSULTANTS:
William H. Pelton, Apt. 2212, 650 Parliament Street, Toronto, Ontario. Robert A. Boll, 50 Hemford Crescent, Don Mills, Ontario.
FIELD TECHNICIANS:
J. Garland, 86 Augusta Street, Port Hope, Ontario.S. Jarvie, 863 Masson Street, Oshawa, Ontario.M. McDonald, 6135 Pow Crescent, N.W, Calgary, Alberta.Plus Extra Labour i -Paul Banville, 145 Bread* Crescent, Scarborough, Ontario.Lewis Straubert, P.O. Box 21 3, Thunder Bay, Ontario.Russell Browning, 52 CornwalHs Drive, Scarborough, Ontario.
DRAUGHTSMEN:
B. Marr, 1 9 Konewen Court, Toronto 16, Ontario. K, Klngebury, 58 Oak Avenue, Rlchvale, Ontario. ^ Hurst, 230 Woburn Avenue, Toronto 12, Ontario.
\^ MAY l 2 197,9 '~
^i^oh^ -W McPHAR GEOPHYSICS LIMITED ': -
WlUiam H. Pelton, GeophyaicUt,
- 13 -
STATEMENT OF COST
Newconex Canadian Exploration Ltd. - IP Survey Canadore Option, Sturgeon I.Akc Area, Ontario.
Crew; J. Garland, 5. Jnrvle - January l 5th - March l Hh, 1971 M. McDonald, S. Jarvle -Mnrch 12th - April 4th, 1971
l
20 day* 25-3/4 days
31 days 4\ days 5 days 31 days
61 days ?. days 8-3/4 days
Operating OperatingTravel ) Preparation )16|dayn Standby ) Bad Weather )
PreparationStandbyBreakdown
Crew ExpensesAir FareVehicle ExpenseFreight and BrokerageBus FareTaxisMeals and AccommodationRented AircraftTelephone and TelegraphCamp SuppliesExcess Baggage
Plue J07o
r $ 265.00/day f- $ ?.BO.OO/d^y
f1 -tJOO.OO/day
J79.001.Z92.70
189.797.65
118.801.957.47,
463.5822.60
581.5115.00
4,828.05
482.805,310.85
$ 5,300.00 6,437.50
J,650.00
N.C.
$13,387.50
5,310.85
Extra Labour Plus P-0%
3,113.00622.60
3,735.60 3.735.60 $22,433.95
Datedt May 17,1971
McPHAR GEOPHYSICS UMITEJ)
William H. Polton, Gcophyelclat.
McPHAR GEOPHYSICS
APPENDIX
THE INTERPRETATION OF
INDUCED POLARIZATION ANOMALIES
FROM RELATIVELY SMALL SOURCES
The induced polarization method was originally developed to detect disseminated sxilphides and has proven to be very successful in the eearch for "porphyry copper" deposits. In recent years we have found that the IP method can also be very useful in exploring for more con centrated deposits of limited size. This type of source gives sharp IP anomalies that are often difficult to interpret.
The anomalous patterns that develop on the contoured data plots will depend on the size, depth and position of the source and the relative size of the electrode interval The data plots are not sections showing the electrical parameters of the ground. When the electrode interval (X) is appreciably greater than the width of the source, a large volume of unmineralized rock is averaged into each measurement. This is particularly true for the large values of the electrode separation (n).
The theoretical scale model results shown in Figure l and Figure Z indicate the effect of depth. If the depth to the top of the source is small compared to the electrode interval (i. e. d X) the measure ment for n s l will be anomalous. In Figure l the depth is 0. 5 units (X s 1.0 units) and the n ;; l value is definitely anomalous; the pattern on the contoured data plot is typical for a relatively shallow, narrow, near-vertical tabular source. The results in Figure 2 are for the same source with the depth increased to 1. 5 units. Here the n = l value is not anomalous; the larger values of (n) are anomalous but the magnitudes are much lower than for the source at less depth.
When the electrode interval is greater than the width of the source, it is not possible to determine its width or exact position between the electrodes. The true IP effect within the source is also indeterminate; the anomaly from a very narrow source with a very large true IP effect will be much the same as that from a zone with twice the width and 1 /2 the true IP effect. The theoretical scale model data shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4 demonstrate this problem. The depth and position of the source are unchanged but the width and true IP effect are varied. The anomalous patterns and magnitudes are essentially the same, hence the data are insufficient to evaluate the source completely.
The normal practise is to indicate the IP anomalies by solid, broken, or dashed bars, depending upon their degree of distinctiveness. These bars represent the surface projection of the anomalous zones as interpreted from the location of the transmitter and receiver electrodes
- z -
when the anomalous values were measured. As illustrated in Figure l, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4, no anomaly can be located with more accuracy than the spread length. While the centre of the solid bar indicating the anomaly corresponds fairly well with the source, tbe length of the bar should not be taken to represent the exact edges of the anomalous material.
If the source is shallow, the anomaly can be better evaluated using a shorter electrode interval. When the electrode interval used approaches the width of the source, the apparent effects measured will be nearly equal to the true effects within the source. When there is some depth to the top of the source, it is not possible to use electrode intervals that are much less than the depth to the source. In this situation, one must realize that a definite ambiguity exists regarding the width of the source and the IP effect within the source.
Our experience has confirmed the desirability of doing detail. When a reconnaissance IP survey using a relatively large electrode ir- terval indicates the presence of a narrow, shallow source, detail with shorter electrode intervals is necessary in order to better locate, and evaluate, the source. The data of most usefulness is obtained when the maximum apparent IP effect is measured for n ~ Z o r n - 3 . For in stance, an anomaly originally located using X = 300' may be checked with X = ZOO 1 and then X - 100'. The data with X -- 100' will be quite different from the original reconnaissance results with X s 300'.
The data shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 are field results from a greenstone area in Quebec. The expected sources were narrow (less than 30' in width) zones of massive, high-grade, s-.hic-silver ore. An electrode interval of 200' was used for the reconnaissance survey in order to keep the rate of progress at an acceptable level. The anomalies located were low in magnitude.
The very weak, shallow anomaly shown in Figure 5 is typical of those located by the X = 2 00' reconnaissance survey. Several anomalies .of this type were detailed using shorter electrode intervals. In most cases the detail measurements suggested broad zones of very weak mineralization. However, in the case of the source at 20N lo 22N, the measurements with shorter electrode intervals confirmed the presence of a strong, narrow source. The X - 5 0' results are shown in Figure 6. Subsequent drilling has shown the source to be 12. 5' of massive sulphide mineralization con taining significant zinc and silver values.
The change in the anomaly that results when the electrode in terval is reduced is not unusual. The X ^ 50' data more accurately locates the narrow source, and permits the geophysicist to make a better evaluation of its importance. The completion of this type of detail is very important, in order to get the maximum usefulness from a reconnaissance IP survey.
McPHAR GEOPHYSICS LIMITED
Theoretical Induced Polarization and Resistivity Studies
Scale Model Cases
t t J ) * ) l J l 1 M H l] l) H II H IT M
44 **
l * 1.1 I.I V rt tt H
l i l * t l 1 "f 11 IJ U W IS * IT 11 t)
(fi)o
t l l ) l l i J t 1 l* li II 11 K II 14 P 11 11
(Ml)fl
' l II tit l l t K n ii li n u M li
(Mf) - O (Mf) 2* 0000
(ft)
I\ s
,/
CASE tt-OS-BU-tO-a
McPHAR GEOPHYSICS LIMITEDTheoretical Induced Polarization and Resistivity Studies
Scale Model Cases
i* t t S t ' II t t II II
,t .. S . . t i .1 * t i .
i i i i
t 11 i * ii t i
lil l t i * * l l l i
* * It 4 l x ' ,- 'x'"T^^^xss* t -l . l l
. i 11 i r /fct 111 1 1\ ^y\' * * * '
(ft)o
41 (14 tl *
(U()o
t i l l l I l ) 1C It 11 J] it li l* 11
(MO - O (Ml) 2 ' 9250
(( l ,
P
l
i
W
l
CASE
5 t. 13 14THEORETICAL
INDUCED POLARIZATION n.,. M..... lo I0 (y97 e e ,0 ,0AND n -3 ---.-.(O 10 IO/ 95 8 7 87 95\v!C 1 0 IO
r,. J - —-- 10 10 1 0 f 9 3 88 B9 88 9 3 \tO 1 0 10
RESISTIVITY STUDIES n n --io \o \o /90 se 90 90 SB 9?\ iO ID iO
SCALE MODEL CASE
PLAN VIEW
^______t______10
ni -i-, i -f
A /- s
X EQUALS 1UNIT
}6
7 H 9 Ip M 12 13 14 IS 16
(F*)o02 -02
o o06 O 02
\\-06 -03 O
0.3 ...--o O -06/ 01W40
n J - O O -05/0^47 43
n-4 O -03 -06/^1-^35 42 4
_7___B 9 '.Q l i l? 13 14 l?
n l 17 O -49 W W/ 4 10
//yn.j--......-.. Q 0 ..,9 74^^460
n-3-0 O -59 jjyQJ*) *K
r. 4--o -JO -59 Xi4l/^Ja2 467 467
i 6 7 fl 9 tO II 12 13 14
10
(Mf), ' O ( Mf ) 2 -11700 i
(Fe)2 - SO'/, l
1'l H E I UN' Of S OIIBCI
4 UNITS
f IG 3
THEORETICAL
NDUCED POLARIZATIONAND
6 7
n-i- -- --10 10 10 y" ftV 9 J 99 \IO 10 10
n -? - K) 10 10/^97 91 91 97\^IO 10 !0
n . J 10 10 (O y' 9 7 92 92 92 9 7\. 10 10 10
RESISTIVITY STUDIES n 4 10 10 PO /se 9 j 95 93 93 96 \ 10 10 \o
SCALE MODEL CASE
PLAN VIEW
*___o
M /- \
X EQUALS l UNIT
J____6____7___8 9 ,p i, i? i j (j) 15 16
n -l -.—- o O -03
n 7 ... - . . o O -OB
n.J- -O O -08 05,
n - A - O O -O7 O8
j 6 7 B 9 10 ij 12 1.3 14
56 78 9 K) n 12 li 14
P2x\ ' IO
{Mf), ' OMPtM tfTCNF O' SOU*CC
4 UNITS
FIG 4
••J
INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY RESULTS
8ATCHELOR LAKE AREA,, QUEBEC.
1*00X/ 4500 x" 12200 M WOO
IMO// 4040 l SI70 WOO// 11700 X IJ20 VI ttOOOO 1700
)720Y\ IZOOO uon.-fi•t— I SOO X X 4*00 J960 ^ X 7*00 l / /Z030
ION I2N UN I6N I8N SON 22N 24N 26N 28N
•l — O-IJ 0-2* 0-M O 0*9 M l T'S/ 0 1 O 01
i-l———087 019 frit 02 01* 07* O 01
i-J————————0-J* O l O J2 02* 0-J* 012 O
(MF),
ION I2N I4N I6N I8N 20N 2 2 H 2 4N 26N 28N
ION I2N I4N I6N I8N 20N 22N 24N 26N 28N
MASSIVE SULPHIDE
ZONC
FIG 5
INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY RESULTS
BATCHELOR LAKE AREA, QUEBEC.
I9N 20 N 21 N 22N 23N
19 N 20 N 2IN
21 0-1 O )t
22N
(MF!,
O 21
23N
024 O t
2-* S 4 -* 4* S* 2 -*
I9N 20N 2IN 22N 23N
GLACIAL OVERBURDEN
MASSIVE SULPHIDE ZONE —
GREENSTONE
Flo. 6
52G1SSW0026 52G15SW0037 BELL LAKE020
RECEIVED
OCT i 5 I97IPROJtCTG SFCTION
REPORT ON
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
CANADORE AKI) AL1X CLAIHS
UKE
STURGEON L/XE AREA
ONTARIO
i
INTRODUCTION
Options were taken on the 75 claim Mix group
and the 21 claim Canadore group in November 1969, because
of their favourable location with respect to the Mattabi
base metal discovery in Block Seven near Sturgeon Lake. ;
Lines were cut on the property in January 1970 and hori
zontal loop electromagnetic and fluxgate magnetometer were l
completed in late February. The surveys disclosed severn! j
anomalous systems on the Alix group, but the Canadore claims {
showed no conductivity. When drilled,the conductors on the j
Alix group proved to be pyrrhotite and some graphite with
only minor amounts of copper and zinc, ;\
Discovery of base metols o/' the New Brunswick ;
Uranium property to the west of our Canadore group renewed
our interest in the ground and io th6 winter of
induced polarization survey was run on Lhe 21 claim Canadore
group and about J^ a -J join ing Alix claims. Only very weak
induced polarization response was encountered^ and none of
tlie indications warranted drilling. In order to be assured
that no area of interest: might have gone undetected the
claims covered by t\\Q I -j** curvcy were mapped geologically
in June and July of this yoflr. This report is concerned
with the results of thxs mapping.
CLAIMS
A total of 34 claims were covered by the geolo
gical mapping. They are:
PA205910 - 205914 inclusivePA205918 - 205927 inclusivePA227153 - 227159 inclusivePA227205 -PA227206 -PA227208 -PA227209 -PA225025 -PA225027 - 225029 inclusivePA227180 - 227183 inclusive
LOCATION AND ACCESS
The claims in question are near Claw and Telephone
lakes some 7 miles east of the Mattabi Mine near Sturgeon
Lake. The Canadore group lies south of Claw Lake and west
of Telephone Lake and the Alix group is east of Telephone
Lake. The claims can be reached by aircraft from Sioux
Lookout or Ignace or on foot on a bush road from the end
of the truck road to Lyon Lake.
WORK ACCOMPLISHED
The object of the geological mapping was to deter
mine if any extensive areas of felsic rock remained undetect
ed on the property. Although basic control for the survey
was the geophysical grid lines which are 400 feet apart, ex
tensive outcrop prospecting and stripping was carried out
3/
between the lines. Particular emphasis was placed on areas
where I.P. responses were reported even though these were
weak.
RESULTS OF THE SURVEY
A map entitled "Geological Plan, Canadore Option"
drawn to a ^cale of one inch equals 400 feet accompanies
this report.
The following sequence of rocks was encountered on
the property:
1. Massive metavolcanics
2. Gneisses: quartz, chlorite, sericite,
hornblende
3. Felsic rocks: rhyodacite and felsic
porphyry
4. Tuff: basic to intermediate
Most of the claim group is underlain by highly
altered massive to schistose chloritic volcanic rocks of
intermediate composition. Attempts to differentiate between
the gneissic and massive units were not successful possibly
because the changes are gradational or owing to scarcity of
outcrop. The massive metavolcanics are dark green to black
in colour and consists of feldspar and hornblende and have
metamorphic textures. The gneisses and schists have similar
colouration but consist primarily of chlorite and hornblende
modified by feldspar, quartz and sericite.
The tuffaceous rocks range in composition from
basic to intermediate, and consist of quartz and feldspathic
fragments in a generally basic ground mass. Most of the
tuff outcrops exhibit shearing. This classification includes
some narrow agglomerate bands.
The felsic rocks were purposely classified as fel
site and rhyodacite to call attention to the more acid member.
These rocks are siliceous to cherty, light coloured, massive
to slightly sheared and consist of quartz, feldspar and some
sericite. Other than the outcrops already reported on the
shore of Claw Lake only one outcrop of felsic rock was located
on the claims,, This outcrop of rhyodacite composition occurs
at 800'N, 8250'W and is probably associated with the felsic
outcrops on the shore, but heavy overburden to the west of
the outcrop obscures the relationship.
As no contacts were observed on the claims the
true strike is not known. However lineation, schistosity
and gneissosity strike about N70"W which is the regional
strike. The dip is steeply south in most cases. The presence
of a possible fold in the felsic rocks shown on Map P.670
(west part) published this year by the. Ontario Department
of Mines was not confirmed by our work.
5/
With the exception of one location (100*N, 6800'W)
little was found to explain the weak I,P. response. In the
above location some narrow shears with thin seams of pyrite
were found in gneissic rocks.
CONCLUSIONS
Careful mapping and outcrop prospecting has shown
that felsic rocks are restricted to the northcentral part of
the group around Claw Lake. Although the outcrops examined
are similar to the felsic host rocks at the New Brunswick
Uranium property and Mattabi they have failed to respond to
electromagnetic or induced polarization surveys and can be
considered to be barren of sulphide concentration within the
range of detectability of these instruments. As presently
known the felsic assemblage on the claims is too smnll to
warrant exploration at depths greater than instrument pene
tration.
The balance of the claim group is underlain by
massive metavolcanics and gneisses of basic to intermediate
composition. Electromagnetic measurements of these rocks
were completely negative and induced polarization response
was weak and local indicating that sulphide mineralization
is present only in very small concentrations. ,-" : .
Toronto, Ontario - j . '; 't.,,..... ..,. "SSeptember 30, 1971 R. A. KntifspnA. r : ;;;,- ;
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Property: Canodoro Option
Mining piv is Ion ; Patricia
RcRistered Holder; Nwconcx Onndion linploration Ltd.
Loco.tlon: Claw Lake iron, Sturgeon Lake, Ontnrlo
oi;. .Survey; Goolo&icnl
Operating Mondays;
I. Percival - 36 - Juno 17 - July 31, 1971
E. Ferris - 22 - Juno 17 - July 16, 1971
W. McDonogh - 21 - July 6 - July 31, 19/1
R. A. Knutoon - 10 - June 24 - July 6, 1971
ConflulUinK Mm U.-sys; 3 - Septcunl^oi; 27 - 30 1971
Ur*ughtinR Msndnya; g^JJ - !;p.pteinbor 21 - 30 1971
Total Itendaya ; 100t
HllcB of line Surveyed; - 30.0
Consul tanto; R. A. Knutaon - 33 Cftehead Rd., Willcn^dwle
Tcchuici/irio;
lain Percival ~ Bundrowes, Bfllblatr, Conon Bridge,Roas-ahire, Scotland
B. G. F*rria - tfox 791, Val d 'Or, Quobec
W. J. McDonagh - 70 Letitio Straat, Birrio, One.
DrauRhtlng; W. J. HcDonajjh
- 8 -
indicated for the corresponding value of Apparent Metal Factor. In
contouring negative values the contour lines are indicated to the nearest
positive value in the immediate vicinity of the negative value.
The symbol "NR" indicates that for some reason the operator
did not attempt to record a reading although normal survey procedures
would suggest that one was required. This may be due to inaccessible
topography or other similar reasons. Any symbol other than those dis
cussed above is, unique to a particular situation and is described within
the body of the report.
METHOD USED IN PLOTTING DIPOLE-DIPOLE
INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY RESULTS
Stotions on line Electrode spreod length Electrode seporotlon
n
n
n
n
4
3
2
l
n - l
n - 2
n - 3
n - 4
_ P P P1,2-6,7 2,3-7,8 3,4-8,9
P P P P1,2-5,6 2,3-6,7 3,4-7,8 4,5-6,9 Apporent Resistivity
p p p p p1,2-4,5 2,3-5,6 3,4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-8,9
P P P P P P1.2-3.4 2,3-4,5 3,4-5,6 4,5-6,7 5,6-7,8 6.7-8.9
MF M f. M .F. M.r M.F. M F 1,2-3,4 2,3-4,5 3,4-5,6 4,5-6,7 5,6-7,8 6,7-8,9 MF. M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F.
" 1,2-4.5 2,3-5.6 3.4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-8,9_______ M.F. MF M.F. M.F
1,2-5,6 2.3-6.7 3,4-7,8 4.5-8,9 Apporent Metol Foctor__________ M.F. M.F. M.F.
1,2-6,7 2,3-7,8 3,4-8.9
n - l
n - 2
n - 3
n - 4
F.E. F. L F.E. f.t. F. E." F.t. 1,2-3,4 2,3-4,5 3,4-5,6 4.5-6,7 5.6-7,8 6,7-8,9
, F.E. F,E. F.L F.E. F.E.1,2-4,5 2,3-5.6 3.4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-8,9
_______ F.E. FE. F.E. F.E.1,2-5,6 2,3-6.7 3.4-7,8 4,5-8,9 Apporent Percent
______ F.E. F.E, F.E. Frequency Effect1,2-6,7 2,3-7.8 3,4-8,9
Fig. A
J i2- Ji*-
----f
V
?
i .O
,1
f-- - -L, - '. s
i S i
LU-- -,~—l
- ~
*o
r ~i~ - — r ~
, *
j--J------.-J.-.
*----*- ——
4---i--i
iii'
---J--—J L
-J j.!
: j?"-
^*
l a
'
- l - l
?, S l
2 ' ?
SPECIAL PROVISION
ASSESSMENT WORK DETAILS
OCT * * ' Tl1
SECTION
Type *fs..rvyA •rporot* form l* required (or each type ol iurv*y
Chief Line Cutter or Contractor-Nam* Addmi
Party r^j^f Jain Percival, Bundrower. Ralbl.oir, Conon Kridftc, Ross-shiro, Scot landName Addrenn
rnn ...i. n niR. A. Knutson._____33 Gal e he a d Rond.____Wll.lowd.ilc, On t: .ir j o____
COVERING DATES Line Cutting .Natno
Field Geology or r..nrk y .ir.JuilG 17 - July 31. 1971
Office September 21 - 30, 1971_________
INSTRUMENT DATA Moke, Model and Type
Scale Constant or Sensitivity - ————————————————————— Or p rovide cofy o/ instrument data from Manufacturer's brochure.
Total Number of Stations Within Clnim Group
ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS REQUESTED
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED
PA - 205910 - 205914- inclusive
——Number of Miles of Line cut Within Cloim
' r7o) ^Geological SurveyV^— f—Days per Clai
Geophysical Survey———^— Days per Clt*m
30.0
PA - 20591B - 205927- inclusive
PA - 227153 - 227159
PA - 227205. 227206, 227208, 227209
PA - 225025, 225027, 225028, 225029
PA - 227180,- 227183 inclusive
DATE Octpber 5 , 1971
TOTAL 3A claims
SIGNED
Special provision credits do not apply to flodiomelric Surveys.
Type of Survey
SPECIAL PROVISION
ASSESSMENT WOUK DETAILS
Induced Polarization
OHT
Chief Line Cutter or
Party Chief
_________________________ ^A ••parole form Is r*qulr*d lor *och type ot *unr*y
McPh.ir Gcophyics, 139 Bond Avenue, Don Mills, Ontario.Nome Addrrn*
J. Garland 86 Augusta St. Pt. Hope, Ontario
Consultant William ?c 11 onHam*
Apt:. 2212Aridrem
650 Parliament St. TorontoM dm* Addr***
COVERING DATES Line Cutting
Field Geology or Geophysics January l r) - April 14, 1971
Office April 3 - 20th. 1971——————————————
INSTRUMENT DATA Make, Model and Type McPhnr Induced Polarization Unit
ScDle Constant or Sensitivity SCO reportOf p rovide copy of instrument data from Manufacturer1 s brochure.
Total Number of Stations Within Claim Group 972 -Number of Miles of Line cut Within Claim Group—-' '
ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS REQUESTED Geological Survey Per
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED
Geophysical Survey.^-^iLy Days per CJO ^ r f *^~ \
Pn, ?O5c ll l
m
DATE
TOTAL
SIGNED
Special provision credits do not apply to Ho Isometric Surveys.
ASSESSMENT WORK BREAKDOWN
1. Type of Survey . Anduc.etJ.Pp.l*iri;j,a.tion
2. Township or Area Jtek1..a.nd..S.hikpji Lakes JSouth of .Sturgepn.LakeJ) .
3. Numbers of Mining Claims Traversed by Survey . 2/^91,0, .tO.lA..lnc.l,U8 ly.e. t ........ ....
.2 05918 . to .2 7. In c l us.lv e,. 2 2 5 O 2,5. t *2 2.5.0 2 .7. .to . 29. .in c l .us lv e^. .2 2.7.1 5.3 . t p. .5 9. . . . .
-^"pAH? *y.eJL . ? 2.7.1 80 .tO .83 .incl.usly e^ .227205 :p6 , 22 7208-09. .
Surveyed k. N umber of Miles of LineX&X ..........?2,'.3 ......., F lown ....NIL . . ., , , , . .
Q79*5. Number of Stations Established ------.-...----...Ir....................................
*6. Make and type of Instrument Used ..H0.?!??/..?:?.'..^^..................... .............
*7. Scale Constant or Sensitivity .........................................................
*8. Frequency Used and Power Output .... ...................................................
9. Summary of Assessment Credits (details on reverse side)
Total 8 hour Technical Days (Include Consultants, Draughting etc.) .."/..if ...........
Total 8 hour Line-Cutting Days
Calculation
290.5 x 7 - 2033.5 * - . 2033.5 ^.34 B 59.8-~i i i , . 1,^ .i-^~^ ' i .ii-ii MI . i, , - _ f ^m^ -i- - ____ L - ,-n ' lin r , ..~ T- --- . i - I-^^--IM-
Technical Line-cutting Number Assessment creditsof claims per claim
The dates listed on this form represent working time spent entirely within the limitsof the above listed claims (x~l CheckIf otherwise, please explain .....................................................,. ....
/' / /-M /^ l — Dated; ..M.IX.5^ A??.2........ .... ... Signed; ^/.^..^f.{.^j^.^.. .
Note: (A) * Cor,j-iete only if applicable. ., .(B) Complete list of names, addresses and dates on reverse,rs,idd(C) Submit separate breakdown for each type of survey, v' , f -.(D) Submit in duplicate. .-/'
ASSESSMENT WORK BREAKDOWN
1. FIELD WORK
Type- of Work Name A Address Dates Workedof
8 hour days
.15-Mar. 11 ^ ...3?;?.
.-,..---..---------.-..-..-.......-.....-.9?^?.?nA:M^M.McDonald 6135 Bow Crescent, N.W.Calgary Jan.l5-Apr.4 54.9
145 Uremia Cres., Scarborough Jan.l5-Apr.4 54.9
P.O. Box 215, Thunder Bay, Jan.l5-Apr.4 54.9•••WB**BHBVKVVVKBBHVBOMVWB.BIBV**(BIKBBB*1BBK*MM*H*B**V*VB*V BM •••••••••HB.VBH H B* MVKVVAM^VK ••••BBBK
RuBSellBrownlng 52 Cornwallls Drive, Scarborough Jan.J5-Apr.4 54.9
2. CONSULTANTS
Number of Name S Address Dates Worked (specify in field or office) 8 hour days
.Rilli-?H.??itp.n....Aj21^. 2J212j --6-50- i-.a.rliarnen^ S,t. t Tor., Apr.. 6jMajj. 1.7. r... 3.
-RfiJi??.P..A:.?All. ^0 Hemford Crescent^, Don Mills Apr.6-Maj^ 17
3. DRAUGHTSMAN, TYPING, OTHERS (specify)
Number of Name 61 Address Type of Work Dates Worked 8 hour days
Kenewen Court^ Toronto Apr. 6 - May 17 4
5B..Oak Avenue^.Rlc.hvale^.Onta.rio...A^r....6..7.MAX-J-7. ...y.
.F....ljyr-s^t 1---2-30 - WpJ3yrn- Aver,ue t Toronto^.\2j_0nt.^ Ajjr. 6 - Maj^ 1.7. ....3,
TOTAL 8 HOUR TECHNICAL DAYS 2 90.5
A. LINE-CUTTING
Number of Name Address Dates Worked 8 hour davs
TOTAL 8 HOUR LINE-CUTTING DAYS
Pf'liJECMS SECTION
Recorder Holdei
Township or Area
MINISTRY OK NATURAL RESOURCES
REVISED. LE.CHNJCAL A55CSSMENT WORK .CME(,l 1 S
(Supersedes Notice, of Intent statement of May 2, 1972)
........ . . ...Newconex.Canadian.Explorst loo L imited
. . . . . .. .Bell.and.Shikag.Lakes.(S..ot.Stucgoon Lake)
Type of Survey and number of Assessment Days Credits per claim
GEOPHYSICAL
Electromagnetic ....... .. ...................days
Magnetometer ...............................days
Radiometric .... .......................days
Induced Polarization .........58..... .d.iys
GEOLOGICAL............. ............................days
GEOCHEMICAL............. ............ .............days
AirborneMan days
Special Provision!_j Ground
NOTICE OF INTENT TO BE ISSUtP
Credits have been reduced because of pallial coverage of claims.
Credits have been j educed because of corrections lo work dates and figures of applicant.
NO CREDITS have been allowed for the following mining claims as they were not sufficiently covered by the survey:
Mininy Claims
Pa. 205910 to 14 inclusive
205918 to 27
225025
225027 to 29 inclusive
227153 to 59
227180 to 83
227205 - 06
227208 - 09
Tht Mining ftccordfi mty iwiiice tlif above ctnfili if ntxemiy in order that the lutst number ol approved lueumetit rjjyi recorded on twh cl.nin rjon not etcrcil the rnmimum ailnwcd li lollvwt: Ccophyiictl - 80: Ctolotiictl - 40, Grochcmicfl - 40;
L v-.r
Schedule.. og.jBloltra, ,~
PA - 205910PA - 205911PA - 205912FA - 205913 'PA - 205914PA * 205918PA * 2G5919PA - 205920PA * 205921PA - 205922PA * 205923PA - 205924PA - 205925PA - 205926PA * 205927
PAPAPAPA
PAPAPAPA
- 225025- 220027- 225020- 22SC29
- 227205- 27.720*- 227203-- 227209
PA ~PA -PA -PA -PA *PA *-PA -
2271532^71.p.-'j2271552?.73..^62273.572':7iS3227159
PA " ?.27).GOPA - 227? 1HFA - 227'- '-J 2PA - 2?. 7' -v J
ONTARIO
Ministry of Natural Resources
RegisteredRoom W 1617 Parliament Buildings Toronto 182
May 10, 1972
Dear Sir:
Re: Geophysical (Induced Polarization) and Geological Surveys, Mining Claims Pa. 205910 et al, Bell and Shikag Lakes
____(S. of Sturgeon Lake), File 2.639
Further to my Notice of Intent dated May 2, 1972. I have re- examined the above Induced Polarization survey in regards to assessing this work under a "Man-days" basis.
Attached herewith is a revised statement which supersedes the previous list sent with my Notice of Intent and is approved as of the date above.
.'J 11*
O J/raw
encl.
416:965-6918 ,,,,,, : .
t i41
Mr. y . Buchan Mining Recorder Court House Sioux Lookout, Ontario
Yours very truly,
Fred W. MatthewsSupervisor
Projects Section
cc : Newconex Canadian Exploration Ltd, Toronto l, Ontario
cc: Mr. R. A, Knutson
cc: McPh-ir Geophysics
cc: Resident Geologist Kenora, Ontario
2:639
i *
/N THE
/N THE
FORMATION
2 ST- l G
P4-
Z05
9Z7
P3-
2059
lZ
PA
-205
913
CLA
W
LAKE
,
P i-
22
72
06
P
2-2
27
20
5
P3-
2059
LEG
EN
D-Z
2502
9TE
LELP
HO
NE
.l
Mas
sive
m
eta
volc
an
ics
Gn
eis
ses:
guart
z-ch
lorite
^ h
orn
ble
nde
3 Fe
lsic
ro
cks
: 3 r
hy
od
ac
ite
4
4 (a
) F
ei s
ite j
4 (b
) fe
lsic
po
rph
yry
Tuff
: ba
sic
to i
nte
rmedia
te
SY
MB
OLS
Sch
isto
sity-G
ne
issosity
-22.
7156
P2
-22
7I5
7
Ste
ep
rid
ge
P3-2
27 IS
OP
Z-2
271S
O
PS
-205918
; O
utc
rop
P3
-2.Z
7I5
3
— —
P
ropert
y bo
unda
ry
s/w
w/v
She
arin
g
P2- P3
-22
7l5
6
P3-Z
05913 J
L p
4-2
05914 D
P3-
2059
14-
" PA
2
05
92
7
^ PA
20
5912
v PA
205913
^-P
A
20
99
(4
2089
26
v PA
22
7(55
' PA
2
27
)64
' P
A
22
71
53
fe^
PA
227183
PA
22
71
81
^ PA
2
27
18
0
), /\
PAJ
KQg^
gy
^ PA
205920
205919
' P
A
2059 r
8
^ —
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
— ~
T
PA
/C0
59
23
1/1
PA
2O
59
24
v- PA
2
27
15
9
^4 2O69
IOVT
el*
20
S9
II
^
PA
20
59
22
^P^
2O69
2I
^271
58
"^
2*71
57fw
n* L
T
2271
36
KEY
MA
P
^
PA225027
^*
i
^^ r
22
B0
29
"
PA
225O
26
*
PA
22
72
O9
^
PA
22
72
O8
PA
22
72
O9
^
PA
22
72
06
EO
LQ
GIC
AL
P
LA
NNE
VJCO
NEX
CANA
DIAN
EXP
LORA
TION
OPTI
ONCA
N AD
OST
URGE
ON L
AKE.
ARE.
A .
•••^••^•^^^^^^^^•^^^•{•^••^^•^^^^•••^^••1
^
^^^^•••••i^
^^^^^^^
J
LTD
Sca
le -
4OQ
*\
S2Gt5SW0B26 52G15SW0037 BELL LAKE
200
i? l -fc -J -J -J
McP
HA
R
GE
OP
HY
SIC
SIN
DU
CE
D
PO
LA
RIZ
AT
ION
A
ND
R
ES
IST
IVIT
Y
SU
RV
EY
PLA
N
MA
P
ex
/PS
*)5
911
LOC
AT
ION
M
AP
SC
ALE
l"s
20
MIL
ES
52 g
;/IS
PR
EF
IX
PA
TO
AL
L
CLA
IM
NU
MB
ER
S
SU
RF
AC
E
PR
OJE
CT
ION
O
F A
NO
MA
LOU
S
ZO
NE
S
PR
OB
AB
LE
m
iniu
m ii
iPO
SSIB
LE
-vxx
xx-%
Nu
mb
er
at
t ha
en
d
of
onom
aty
in
dic
ate
s
spre
ad
use
d.
52G
15S
WC
1026
5
2G15
SW
a037
B
ELL
LA
KE
210
NE
WC
ON
EX
C
AN
AD
IAN
E
XP
LOR
ATI
ON
LT
DC
AN
AD
OR
E O
PTI
ON
, TE
LEP
HO
NE
LA
KE
STU
RG
EO
N L
AK
E
AR
EA
, P
AT
RIC
IA
M. D
., O
NTA
RIO
SC
ALE
ON
E IN
CH E
QU
ALS
FO
UR
HU
ND
RED
FE
ET
LEG
EN
D
MA
GN
ET
IC
TR
EN
DS
ST
RO
NG
, -—
—
WE
AK
l P Z
ON
ES
i
OPTI
OH
DW
G.
IPP
-47
77
N - S
N - li
N - 3
N - 2
N - l
7400 6450 , i 2860 ^ 3340 . 6260 w 4817 9486
3630 4580
1810 1600 ^ 1410 v 860 , , v 2860 , 3500
1*220 38*40
W60 3120
3000
2260
2080 2070 2520
N - S
N -
N - 3
N - 2
N -
RESISTIVITY (flPP.) IN OHM FEET X 2*
. 63 . US . 23 2N . 4N 6N 8N .ION .. 12N . , 14N 16N 18N 20N——L——
22N 2WS S f S J"
26N —i—
28N—o—,
RESISTIVITY (flPP.) IN OHM FEET X 2ir
30N 32N 3UN 36N 38N 40N
METflL FRCTOR (flPP.) METflL FflCTOR (flPP.)
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - U
N - S
0.1
0.2
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - H
N - 5
63-i—,
23 2N 4N 6N 8N ION—t—
12N 14H 16N 1BN 20N 22N24N26M26N .SON 32N 9*4 36N 36N 40N
FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPP.) IN ^ FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPP.) IN X
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
M - *4
N - 5
3.2 3.6 v 6.0 , , 2.8 . 3.3 3.2
S."* 3,5 4.0 3.7
2.9 . 2,7. !.0 \ 3.1 . B
H.3
4.2 ^ S.S NEG 1.7
5.8 NEC
1.0 . v 2.0 1.2 2.3
1.0 NEC 2.8
2,8 NEG 2.7 NEG NEC NEG
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - U
N - 5
DWG. NO.- I.P.-5461-1
NENCONEX CflNflDIflN EXPLORflTION LTD.CflNROORE OPTION, TELEPHONE LflKE
STURGEON LflKE flREfl
PflTRICIfl M.D., ONTflRIO
LINE NO.- 36H
ELECTRODE CONFIGURATION •*-X-**——NX——**-X-^
N xN X\ X
PLOTTING \ , 'POINT —*X X s 200 1
SURFflCE PROJECTION OF ANOMALOUS ZONES
DEFINITE -MMMMPROBABLE m inimumPOSSIBLE x xxyx
FREQUENCIES! 0.31-5.0 H? QflTE SURVEYEOt Hflfl 1971
NOTEi CONTOURS flT LOGflRITHMIC INTERVALS I.-i.5-2.-3.-S.-7.5-10 DfiTEi
McPHflR GEOPHYSICSINDUCED POLRRIZflTION flND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
NOTE* THIS PUn MRS PMOUCED WITH AN IBM 360/85 COWER RHO fi CflLCWP PLOTTER
N - 5
N - 14
N - 3
N - 2
N - l
7632 NR 8624 8024 v 6000 , v 2900
6320 5960
11200\\ 5240
2120
2770 2360
2030 2051 , , . 7600 , , , 2556 1360 . . 2236 . - 1400 , , 586 , ^ 1300
2130 2480
2300
\870
670
N - 5
N - 4
N - 3
N - 2
N - l
RESISTIVITY (flPP.) IN OHM FEET / 2 tr RESISTIVITY (flPP.) IN OHM FEET / 2 ir
IDS ..BS .65 USl———————————————L
2S-t—
2N-i—
, 6N 8N ION 121 . 14N 16N 18N 20NJ—————————————L
f S J S S———l—————————————l—xxx x x x x x x;
22N —j—
24N 26N —i—
28N 30NXXX
32N —t—
34N 36N
METflL FACTOR (flPPJ METflL FflCTOR tflPP.)
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - 4
N - 5
0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 1.1
/0.6
0.3 0.6 0.3 NEG 0.4
0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5
0.7 0.6
0.6
1.5 NEG 0.6
0.8 v , v , 3.6
0.6
0.7 0.6 1.1
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - 4
N - S
10S .BS 63 43 23 .0 2N 4N-t—
6N . BN ION 14N . 16N . 18N 20N 22N 24N—4——
26M 2BN SON 32N 34N 36N
FREQUENCY EFFECT tflPP.) IN X FREQUENCY EFFECT CflPP.) IN X
N - i
N - 2
N - 3
N - 14
N - 5
2.6 2-5 . 3,0 3.0 . 2.3 , , 1.3 v v 2.0 2.2
2.1 NEG 3.0
2.0 2-S 3-6 8.0 NEG 3.8 \ \ 1.8 X UO X X 2.6
4.0 A f l.B l XX 2.1
3.6 4.3 v 2.6
4.1 3.2 l 2.3
1.8 3.6 S 2 .6
0.9 v 1.1
0.1
0.9
0.6 \ f 1.5
0.8 'N X 1.5
N -
N - 2
N - 3
N -
N - 5
DWG. NO.- I. P.-5461-2
NEWCONEX CflNflDIflN EXPLORflTION LTD.CflNflDORE OPTION. TELEPHONE LflKE
STURGEON LflKE flREfl
PflTRICIfl M.D., ONTflRIO
LINE NO.- HOU.
ELECTRODE CONFIGURRTION •*-X-** —— NX —— *-*-X-*-
\ xPLOTTING \ x xPOINT — +X X - 200 1
SURFRCE PROJECTIONOF ZONES; AY 'f ! M l iDEFINITEPROBflBLE minimum " 0?: ; \ ^yPOSSIBLE xxx xx ::,.,^ ^
FREQUENCIES! Q.31-5.Q H? DflTE SURVEYED: Hflfl 1971
APPROVED!
NOTEi CONTOURS RT LOGflRITHMIC INTERVALS U-l.5-2.-3.-5.-7.5-10 DflTEs
McPHflR GEOPHYSICSINDUCED POLRRIZflTION flNO RESISTIVITY SURVEY
N - 5
N - 3
N - 2
N - l
9324 . 1U726 .9500 v 13800 , , 5600 5790 K ^ v . 1120 . . 2680 3570 2000 1 S60
8500 X. 11328 ^ 7960
U7SO ^X 8400
2500 , 1610 1790 . 2230 . 1560
2190
2250 2370
522 , ^ , 1860 , fc 910
512
375 339
589
710 660
N - 5
N - 4
N - 3
N - 2
N -
DWG. NO.- I.P.- 5461-3
RESISTIVITY IAPP.) IN OHM FEET / 2*
85 63 IS 0. 2N-l—
4N 6N BN-i—
ION 12N 14N 16N 18N 20N
RESISTIVITY (flPP.) IN OHM FEET /
28N 30N . 32N 34N 36N 38N
NEWCONEX CflNflDIflN EXPLORflTION LTD.CflNflDORE OPTION. TELEPHONE LflKE
STURGEON LflKE flREfl
PflTRICIfl M. D., ONTflRIO
LINE NO.-
METflL FACTOR (flPPJMETflL FflCTOR (flPP.)
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N ~ 4
N - 5
0.4 0 .4 0,8 0.4 0.2 0 .4 4.6 2.5 4.8 3.3 3.2 . 1.8
0.1 0.2 0 .3 0.4 0.4 0.3 NEG 0.9 X\ 1.5 2.1 2.0 ) 1.5
0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 N NEG 0.6 N 1.0 2.0
0.9
1.5 X X 0.5 X 1.3
1.0
3,1
2.4
1.8
N -
N - 2
N - 3
N - 4
N - S
ELECTRODE CONFIGURflTION *-X-**——NX——x-X-*
\ x
PLOTTING \ x'POINT X s ZOO 1
83 6S 2S O BN 8N ION 12N 14N 16N 18N 20N 22N 3U426N28N30N32N34N36N38N
SURFflCE PROJECTION OF flNOMflLOUS ZONES
PROBflBLE POSSIBLE xx x x x
FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPP.) IN XFREQUENCY EFFECT (flPP.J IN X
N -
N - 2
N - 3
N - 4
N - 5 52S15SW0026 52G15SW0037 BELL LAKE
1.8 , v 3.2 - 3.* 3.7
2.4 2.1* ^ 3.1
2.6 1.3 , 1.7 1.6 y , 3.8 4.0 , 2.6
4.0 2.6 S 3 .1 3.7 / 2.6
2.1 NEE 1.8 I.S
NEG 1.6
3.6 1.1
1.8 3.1 3.B 2.7
1.2
1.3
1.1
1.9 ^ 2.0
l.U
1.6
220
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - 4
N - 5
FREQUENCIES: Q.31-5.Q HZ
NOTE: CONTOURS flT LOGflRITHMIC INTERVflLS 1.-l,5-2.-3.-5.-7.5-10
DflTE StiRVEYEDt MflR-197-1
flPPROVED:
DflTEt
McPHRR GEOPHYSICSINDUCED POLRRIZflTIQN HMD RESISTIVITY SURVEY
NOTEi THIS PLOT HRS PflOOUCED WITH flN IBM 360/65 COHPUTER flND H CflLCOMP
N -
H
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
7270
.8
200
9400
,
. x
2208
6 t
, t
t v
4662
v
2240
,
1910
4580
\
l 15
60
4800
X
27
83
X
1560
4290
f
215
0 ,
, 11
9072
0 ,
392
1000
239
252
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
J IN
OHM
FEE
T /
2*R
ES
ISTI
VIT
Y
IflP
P.)
IN O
HM F
EET
/ 2"
103
8S.
63.
4525 -t—
O 2N
- UN.
6N'.
8N
ION.
12N.
14N
16N
18N
20N
22N
S S
S S
S
*
S
f
26N
28N
30N
r X"
^Il
llll
llll
llll
llll
tlf
llll
ir J
S S
32N
3HN
36N
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
JM
ETflL
FflC
TOR
(flP
P.)
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
0.2
0.2
1.6
0.1
0.2
O.S
0.3
NEC
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.7
-5
X
1.1
2.2
NEC
NR
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
U
N -
5
BS ,
63
43
232N
.. 4M
. 6N
. 8N
ION
12N
14N
16M
20N
22N.
24
N 26
N.
26N
SON
32N
3MN
. ...*
36N
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
J IN
XFR
EQUE
NCY
EFFE
CT
tflPP
.) IN
X
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
i.o3.
4 .
2.7
2.2
. 1.
9 .
. 2.7
2.
43.
3 1.
6 *1
.8
, 2.
4
2.3
\
3.7
3,1 \
2.8
2.4
2.2
2,6
NEC
2.3
2.3
1.4
2.6
\
4.S
3.
4 \
2.4
2.2
2.3
2.7
2.
2
2.3
2.0
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.4
NEC
NR
N -
5
N -
y
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
J IN
OHM
FEE
T /
2"
MET
RL F
flCTO
R tfl
PP
.)
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
li
N -
5
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FEC
T C
flPPJ
IN
7.
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
J IN
OHM
FEE
T /
MET
flL F
fiCTO
R (fl
PP
.)
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
J IN
X
N -
N -
2
N -
3
N -
N -
552G15SW0826
52G15SW0037
SELL LAKE
230
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
DWG.
NO.- I.
P.-
546I
-4
NEWC
ONEX
CRNflDIflN
EXPLORflTION L
TD.
CflN
flDO
RE O
PTIO
N,
TELE
PHON
E Lf
lKE
STUR
GEON
LflK
E flR
Efl
PflT
RIC
Ifl
M.D
-. O
NTflR
IO
LINE
Mfl--
ELEC
TROD
E CO
NFIG
URflT
ION
-*-X
-** —
— NX
——
**-X
-*
PLO
TTIN
G \
s'
POIN
TX
- 20
01
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF f
lNOM
RLOU
S ZO
NES
DEF
INIT
E —
——
i~PR
OBf
lBLE
IM
HIM
IIIM
IIPO
SSIB
LE ' ' ' ' '
WAY
121
3/2
FREO
UENC
IESi
0.
31-5
.Q H
Z
NOTE
i CO
NTOU
RS
RT
LOG
ARIT
HMIC
IN
TER
VflL
S 1.-
1.5
-2.-
3.-
S.-
7,5
-10
DflT
E SU
RVEY
ED!
MPf
l 19
71
DflT
Ei
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SIN
DUCE
D PG
LflR
IZflT
ION
flN
D R
ES
ISTI
VIT
Y
SURV
EYNO
TE*
THIS
PLO
T MR
S PR
ODUC
ED W
ITH
flN I
BM 3
80/6
5 CO
MPUT
ER A
ND
A C
flLC
Wf
PLOT
TER
3150
5600
. 98
00
.6830
5740
. k
2800
2840
, 4620
v v
^ 11000
, 7500
, ,
, y
t 11
40
. v
2670
1000
—
2400
1680
1020
NR
N -
5
N -
4
N ~
3
N -
2
N -
l
DWG.
N
O.-
T.P
.-
54
61
-5
l US
, 12
310
3 83
6SUS
23
2N
. UN
6N
8N
ION
12N
.
1UN
. 16
N.'
18N
20
N
22N
2U
N 26
N
28N
f f *
S
S
S
30N
32N
l _ l
Illl
llllll
llllll
ltRE
SIS
TIV
ITY
tft
PP
.) IN
OHM
FEE
T X
2"
34N
36N
38N
1.1
1.0
1.4
1.5
U7
1.3
\
l.8
NE
C 3.
S
NR0.
6J.6
\
1.1
S
Q.
1.9
MET
AL F
flCTO
R W
P-)
1.9
1.8 \\
l 6.
0
0.5
l.SNR
NR
NR
NR
NRW
NR
W
NR
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
NEW
CGNE
X C
flNR
DIfl
N
EXPL
GR
flTIG
N
LTD
.Cf
lNflD
ORE
OPT
ION
, TE
LEPH
ON
E Lf
lKE
STUR
GEON
Lf
lKE
flRE
fl
PflT
RIC
Ifl M
. D.,
ON
TflR
IO
LIN
E
NO
.-
ELEC
TROD
E C
ON
FIG
UR
flTIO
N
-*-X
-*-*
——
NX
——
*-*—
iX-*
PLO
TTIN
G
POIN
TX
* 2
00'
SURF
flCE
PRO
JEC
TIO
N
OF R
NOM
flLOU
S ZO
NE
S
/
DEF
INIT
E —
——
—
— !
lPR
OBf
lBLE
iH
iiiiii
iiMii
XPO
SSIB
LE
s"' '
MAY
l 2
1372
143
105
8563
4S
232N
. 4N
6N
, ON
ION
1?N
14N
16N
18N
20N
22N
2BN
28N
3QN
32N
34N
36N
38N
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
J IN
7.
L U
IP^
,2
x
2.8
\
(|.7
2.2
z.e
2.0
2.H
2.
1|
2.7
3.2
2.7
\
3.7
2.8
2.1
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.S
3.2
3.6
, 2.
0
0.7
1.3
1.0
1.0
f 0
.8
0.7
O.S
0.
2
1.8
1.8
M \
0.3
0.6
2.7
2.1
m
mm
N -
i
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
FREQ
UENC
IESi
0.
31-5
.Q
NOTE
* CO
NTOU
RS
flT
LOG
flRIT
HMIC
IN
TER
VflL
S 1.-
1.5
-2.-
3.-
5.-
7.5
-10
OR
TE
SU
RVEY
ED*
MftR
19
71
flPPF
MJV
ED*
DR
TE
t
McP
HflR
G
EO
PH
YS
ICS
IND
UC
ED
PO
LflR
IZflT
ION
flN
D R
ES
IST
IVIT
Y
SURV
EY
|o P
LOT
MRS
PRODUCED W
ITH
flN
IBH 36
0/65
CO
MPUT
ER f
lND
fl CflLCOMP PLOTTER
12SO
11*30
1300
1100
1200
1190
, 1670
17SO
v
2350
K v
S1SO
; v
v 1620
^ 1140
1110
K
1970
, ,
3650
^
2110
. ,
1335
v 1625
^ 2170
1210
1380
1165
1200
1090
1085
( 1575
1545
1610
970 X
1060
975 V
1065
1100
12
50
1250
625
710
620
650
667
690
720
670
\
795
1025
1395
1200
2670
2490
29
20
2000
2555
28
30
2210
2645
20
00
2000
3000
^
2330
26
60
, 17
30
1500
2130
S
S
Hi6
0 1"
WO
1090
NR
NR
4020
v
5800
3080
N -
5
N -
N -
3
N -
2
N -
46S
403
38
336
S .
3US
32S
. 30
S 28
3 .
. 26
3 .
2US
22S
20S
-183-163
12S
103
83
. 65
2S2N
UN
.
6N
8N
ION
12N
UN
—i—
16N
I8N
SON
22N
2UN
RESI
STIV
ITY
(RPP
.)
IN O
HM F
EET
/ 2n
26N
28N
SON
32N
3UN
36N
ssssssss
s s
y *
f f f
s s
s s
s s
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
.)
0.2
v 1.
00.
60.
60.
8
0.2
O.It
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.1
O.I
0.9
0.8
0.8
v 1.
1 ,
0.7
0.
30.
40.
7 0.
5 0.
7 v
1.0
, 0.
4 0.
40.5
0.5
0.8
2.4
, ,
U2
0.3
0.8
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.2
0.5
0.8
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.4
1.5
, 1.
0
1.0
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.2
0,4
0.9
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.9
0,4
0.4
0.6
0,7
0.7
0,5
.7
X
1.
0.2
0,9
0.5
0.2
v 1.
3
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.9
0.6
N 0.
8
0.3
0.2
0.3
NEC
NR
NRNR
NR
NR
MR
NR
NR
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
14
N -
5
463
UUS
U2S
. 40
S3
83
363
. 34
332
330
3 28
3 2B
S .
243
22S
. 20
3IB
SIB
S W
S 12
5 10
3 83
63
2S2N
6N12
N 14
N16
N .
18N
20N
22N
24N
. 26
N 2B
N30
N 32
N 3U
M 36
N
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
tfl
PP
J IN
7.
J.I
0.7
O.U
0.2
O.U
O.tt
0.
70.
3
0.1
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
1.0
1.1
1.4
1.2
1,3
1.1
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.6
O.S
^
. 1.
5 ,
k O
.S
0.7
1.0
0.9
0.6
0.4
0.9
0.4
0.9
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.6
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.0
DWG.
N
O.-
I.P
.-
5461
-6
NEWC
ONEX
CflN
flDI
flN
EXPL
GRRT
ION
LTD.
CflN
flOO
RE O
PTION, TE
LEPH
ONE
LflK
EST
URGE
ON L
flKE
flREfl
PflT
RICI
R M.D.,
ONTflRIO
LIN
E
NO
.-
56H
ELEC
TROD
E CO
NFIG
URflT
ION
•*-X
~*-
* ——
NX —
— *-
*-X
-**
PLO
TTIN
G
sPO
INT
— *X
X
= 20
0'
SURF
RCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF f
lNOM
flLOU
S ZO
NES
PRO
BflB
LE
iiniii
iMiii
iiPO
SSIB
LE '
s ' ' '
MAY
l
FREQ
UENC
IESi
Q
.31-
5.Q
HZ
NOTE
: CO
NTOU
RS
flT
LOG
flRIT
HMIC
IN
TER
VflL
S 1.-
1.5
-2,-
3,-
S.-
7.5
-10
DflT
E SU
RVEY
ED:
MftR
19
71
flPPR
OVE
D:
DflT
Et
McPH
RR GEOPHYSI
CSIN
DUCED
POLR
RIZf
lTIO
N fl
ND R
ESISTI
VITY
SU
RVEY
NffT
Ei
THIS
PLO
T MR
S PR
ODUC
ED W
ITH
flN I
BM 3
60/6
5 CO
MPUT
ER f
lND
fi Cf
lLCOM
P PL
OTTE
R
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
.) IN
OHM
FEE
T X
2*
MET
flL F
ftCTO
R (fl
PP
J
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
14
N -
5
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
.) IN
7,
N -
N -
2
N -
3
N -
5
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(*
PJ
IN O
HM F
EET
/ 2
ir
MET
flL F
ftCTO
R (R
PPJ
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
tfl
PP
.) IN
X
N -
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
J IN
OHM
FEE
T /
2*
MET
AL F
RCTO
R tfl
PP
.)
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
1030
k
. 2UOO
. ,
1070
v x
2580
v
1500
370
350
\2U
2 X
32
5
U95
368
NR
NR
NR
NRMR
NR
NR
1050
NR
1*61
0 36
10
1830
18
80
1720
.
2760
27
60
. UU
60
NR
605
NR
775
J\\
1780
3690
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
30S
. 28
5 26
S 24
5 22
S .
20S
18S
16S
123
-IDS
8S
. 65
4S
2S
2N..
4N... -
,—*—,
6N
. 8N
ION
—i—
12N
14N
16N
—t18N
20N
22N
24N
26N
s s
s s
s s
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
.) IN
OHM
FEE
T /
2*
28N
30
N 32
N 34
N—
—L—
——
——
——
——
——
——
—l_
____
____
____
__'—
—-_
____
____
__l
2.5
, 1.9
0,2
0.6
Q.i*
0.
2
0.3
0.6
0.9
0.8
0.1
0.1
0.8
0.9
0.8.
1.1
0.8
0.6
2.3
O.S
0,
2
0.1
0.7
0.8
0,3
0.2
NR
0.7
0.7
NEC
0,6
0.6
0.1
0.2
0.9
NEC
NR
1.3
1.0
0.3
O.U
O.i*
0.1
MET
flL F
flCTG
R (fl
PP.)
0,3
9 0.
9 0.
6 0.
2 NE
C 0,
20.
3
O.U
0.6
NEC
1.2
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.1
NEC
0.2
0.5
0.3
0,3
0.9
0.7
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
303
283
343
2HS
.203
18
3 16
3 1U
S 12
3 10
3 83
63
US
.2
3UN
8N
ION
12N
—i—
1UN
16N
—i
18N i
20N i
22N t
2UN i
26N
28
N
SON
32N
3UN
FREQ
UENC
T EF
FEC
T tfl
PP
.)
IN
X
0,6
0.6
O.U
0.1
0.3
O.S
O.
U0.
2 0.
5 0.
7 O.
U O.
U 0.
9 O.
U 0.
8 0.
6 .
O.S
0.
8 t.
3
O.U
0.1
0,3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.5
0,2
0.7
0,1
0.5
0.1
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.6
O.S
0.
9 0.
1 0.
1 0.
3 0.
6 O
.I*
O.I*
O
.U
0.5
-0.1
Q
.S
0.7
0.2
0.1
O.I
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.1
-O.I
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.6
0.1
NN
1.6
, 2.
3 2.
5 2,
2
2.8
2.3
2.5
2.6
l.i*
1.0
f 0.
3 ,
1.2
1.9
-O.I
NR
MR
1.8
\
2.2
MEG
Nn
NR
-0,9
0.
9
0,6
Mn
1.3
N -
N -
2
DWG.
N
O.-
I. P
.-5
46
1-7
NENC
ONEX
Cf
lNfl
DIfl
N EXPLGRflTION LT
D.Cf
lNRD
ORE
OPT
ION,
TE
LEPH
ONE
LPKE
STUR
GEON
LRK
E flR
Efi
PflT
RIC
Ifl
M.D
.. O
NTRR
IO
LIN
E
NO
.- SO
W
ELECTRODE
CONFIG
URfl
TION
*-X-x——NX——*-*-X-*-
\ s
PLO
TTIN
G \
s'
POIN
T —
*X
X
= 20
0'
SURF
flCE
PROJECTION
'; OF f
lNOM
flLQ
US ZONE
S
DEF
INIT
E —
—^^
PROB
flBLE
ni
iiiiii
iiiiii
POSS
IBLE
'
y ' s
MM
FREQUE
NCIE
S:
0.31-5
.D HZ
NOTEi
CONTOU
RS
flT
LOGARITHMIC
INTE
RVfl
LS
1.-1.5-2.-3.-5.-7.5-10
DflTE SU
RVEY
ED i
MflR 1971
flPPR
OVE
Dt
DflT
Ei
N -
McPH
flR
GEOP
HYSI
CSIN
Du:r
n POLR
BIZHTI
ON RND
RESISTIVITY
SURVEY
Hij
"V.3T
MR?
'^O
Oua
r W
ITH
AN
IBM
360/
85 C
OMPU
TER
flND
R Cf
lLCOM
P PL
OTTE
R
300
370
390
405
490
2010
. 3820
938
. HUO
1U7S
.
, ,
v 5UOO
,
3UOO
, ,
, 1010
1USO
NR
NR
NR
NR
4780
UU80
2370
2200
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
75
7697
880
958
303
28S
26S
24S
223
203
183
IBS
143
12S
l OS
83
6S
43
Ki
i i
t i
i i
. ^
^*^
^*j
0.
2N4N
/•X
XX
XX
XX
S S
S S J S f
.
RESISTIVITY
(flPP.)
IN O
HM F
EET
/ 2n
6N
8N
l ON
12N
14N
16N
18N
20N
22N
24N
26N
28N
SON
32N
34N
' ^ S
S
S
S
f
MET
flL F
ftCTO
R (fl
PP
J
8.0
, ,
t 2.
6
1.6
O.S
1.9
0.8
NR
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
303
283
263
——L—
aus
—i—
22S
203
—i—
183
163
——U-
1U3
j
123
103
BS
63US
23 -j—
.2N
ION
1ZN
KIN
16N
18N
20N
—i—
22N
26N
28N
30N
32N
3UN
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FEC
T (f
lPP
J IN
X
0.6
0.2
0.6
0.6
0.2
0.3
0.3
O.i*
0.7
0,5
0.3
0.6
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.3
O.I
0,3
0-2
0.8
v LO
, 0.9
0.8
, 1.3
0-3
0.6
0.6
0.8
Q.8
0.0
0.9
o.i
0.3
0.5
0.2
0-1
O**
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
Q.l
0.1
0.5
O.U
0.3
0.1
-0,2
o.i
0,1
O.U
0.1
O.I
0.2
0.1*
o.a
0.6
O.U
o.e
0.7
S
1.0
1.14
0.7
1.3
1.3
0.7
. ,
4 2.
3 2.
5 2.
8 2.
2 2.
0
2.9
2.2
MR
NR
NR
MR
1.8
1.5
^
1.3
1.6
Nn
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
DWG,
N
O.-
K P
. -5
46
1 -
8
NENC
ONEX
CflNRDIRN
EXPL
ORfl
TIGN
LTD.
CflN
flDG
RE
OP
TIO
N,
TELE
PHO
NE
LflK
E
STUR
GEO
N Lf
lKE
flR
ER
PflT
RIC
Ifl M
.D,,
ON
THR
IO
LIN
E
NO
.-
6UH
ELEC
TROD
E CO
NFIG
URflT
ION
-*~
X-x
——
NX
——
*-*-
X-*
'
PLO
TTIN
G \
POIN
T —
*X
* 20
0'
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF f
lNOM
flLOU
S HO
NES
DEF
INIT
EPR
OBf
lBLE
m
inim
um
POSS
IBLE
y
s s
y s'
MAY
l
2 19
7J
FREQUE
NCIE
S:
0.31-5
.Q H7
NOTE:
CONTOU
RS
RT
LOGflRITHMIC
INTERVflLS
1.-1
.5-2
.-3.
-5.-
7.5-
10
DflT
E SU
RVE
YED
: M
flR
1971
flPPR
OVE
D:
DflT
E:
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SIN
DUCE
D P
OLf
lRIZ
flTIO
N
flND
R
ES
IST
IVIT
Y
SURV
EY
NOTEi
THIS
PLOT
HflS P
RODU
CED HUH f
lN IB
M 360/6S CO
HPUT
ER A
ND
fi Cf
lLCf
l** PL
OTTE
R
855
, 11
30
1070
89
591
059
0 v
U50
420
570
, UO
C
320
S
1070
12
50
785
f 1060
1080
1170
790
930
325
\
1075
uso
360
U65
415
395
665
700
NR
NR
NR
NR10
20
1020
^
1565
^
2395
uooo
378
355
315
380
U50
680
665
720
5UO
1UOO
NR
81
0 93
595
031
00
715
NR
310
NR
lOSO
900
855
2850
765
905
2680
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
tfl
PP
.)
IN
OHM
FEET
/
2n
N -
S
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
463
445
42S
. 40
S 38
S 36
3 34
3 32
3 30
3 ,
283
263
. 24
S .
22S
203
— t
183
1 65 i
143
. 12
S ,
IDS
836S
-j—
43 j-...
25
O2N
Illl
llll
llll
llll
llll
llll
llll
llll
llll
l6N -i—
8N
ION
12N
14N
16N
MET
flL
FftC
TOR
(f
lPP
.)
2.2
, v
1.3
v 1.
5 1.
8
1.8
l 1.
0
1.2
1.0
1.3
. ,
2.1
1.1
1.1
Kl
1.2
3.0
NR2.
10.
2 v
. .
2.1
. 1.
7 .
, 0.
5 0.
9 0.
6
NR
Nft
NR
3.6
0,7
NR
0.7
NR
1.4
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.8
0
.60
.8
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.5
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
46S
U2S
UO
S.3
8S
.
36S
- 3U
S 32
S 30
3 28
3 2
63
3*3
22
3 20
S18
3 .
163
1US
123
103
—t—
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
—l—
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
—i—
——
——
——
——
——
——
—^i
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
L~83
63
. US
23
-J—
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
t——
——
——
——
——
——
——
—L-
2N
. UN
6N
. 8N
IO
N 12
N 1U
N 16
N
FREQUENCY
EFFE
CT
CflP
P.)
IN X
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(f
lPPJ
IN
X
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
1.3
1.0
^ 1,
5
l,
I.I
1.0
1.2
0.6
1.1
O.e
0.7
0.9
N
1.0
0,7
0.8
0.3
0.4
1.2
. 1.
9
1.0
1.0
1.1
o.s
o.e
0.9
\
1.0
52G15SW0026
52G15SWB037
BELL LAKE
240
DWG.
NO
.- I.P.- 54
61 -
9
NENC
GNEX
CflNflDIflN
EXPLGRflTION LTD.
CflN
RDO
RE
OPT
ION
, TE
LEPH
ONE
Lf
lKE
STUR
GEO
N Lf
lKE
RR
Efl
PflT
RIC
Ifl
M.D
., O
NTR
RIO
LIN
E
NO
.-
68M
ELEC
TROD
E CONFIGURflTION
*-X-x——NX——**-X-*
PLOT
TING
?
POIN
T —*-X X
= 200'
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
IflH
OF
flNOM
flLOU
S ZO
NES
DEF
INIT
E PR
OBf
lBLE
POSS
IBLE
y
s y
s s
FREQUE
NCIE
S:
Q.31-5
.O HZ
DflT
E SURVEYED:
FEB
1971
flPPROVED:
NOTE
: CONT
OURS
fl
T LOGflRITHMIC
INTE
RVfl
LS
U-l.
5-2.
-3.-
5,-7
.5-1
0
^
McPH
flR
GEOP
HYSI
CSINDUCED
PGLRRIZflTION
flND
RESIST
IVIT
Y SURVEY
NOTEi
THIS PLOT
HflS PRODUCED WITH f
lN IB
M 360/65 CO
MPUT
ER R
NO
fi Cf
lLCO
MP P
LOTTER
N - 5
N -
N - 3
N - 2
N -
1610
1740
1460 NR
1000 250
1460 214
N - 5
N -
N - 3
N - 2
N -
RESISTIVITY IflPP.) IN OHM FEET l 2* RESISTIVITY (flPPJ IN OHM FEET X 2*
l OS 8S 6S 2NS S S S S f XIIMIIIIIIIIIIItlll
METflL FflCTOR (flPP.) METflL FflCTOR (flPP.)
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - U
N - 5
2.3 1.1
NEC
5.2
NEC NR
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - H
N - 5
10S 83 6S 4S 23 2N
FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPP.) IN 7,
N -
N - 2
N - 3
N - 4
N - S
2.1 1.6
NEC
FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPPJ IN 7.
i.i
1.2
NEC NR
N -
N - 2
N - 3
N - 4
N - S
DWG. NO.- I.R.- 5461-10
NEWCONEX CflNRDIflN EXPLORflTION LTD.CflNflDORE OPTION. TELEPHONE LRKE
STURGEON LRKE RRER PRTRICIR M.D., ONTflRIO
LINE NO.- 68H (REPEAT)
ELECTRODE CONFIGURflTION -*-X-**——NX——**-X-*
PLOTTING \ x'POINT —*X X * 200'
SURFACE PROJECTION OF flNOMflLQUS ZONES
DEFINITE ———*—PRGBflBLE m inimumPOSSIBLE ' xxxx
FREQUENCIESi Q.31-5.Q HZ
NOTE* CONTOURS RT LOGflRITHMIC INTERVflLS 1.-1.5-2.-3.-5.-7.5-10
OflTE SURVEYED! MBR 1971
flPPROVEDi
DflTE
McPHRR GEOPHYSICSINDUCED POLRflIZRTION RNO RESISTIVITY SURVEY
NOTEi THIS PLOT MRS PRODUCED WITH RN IBH 360/65 COMPUTER flND R CflLCOMP PLOTTEH
N - 5
N - 4
N - 3
N - 2
N - l
NR illO
1020 1170
RESISTIVITY tflPPJ IN OHM FEET / 2n
1105
1980 3810 1030 2140 3340
1700 1040
RESISTIVITY (flPP.) IN OHM FEET / 2n
N - 5
N - H
N - 3
N - 2
N -
ION 12N 14N 16N 18N—i—
20N 22N 2UN 26NX X X X X
28N —i—
30N 32N
METflL FflCTOR (flPP.) METflL FflCTOR tflPP.)
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - U
N - 5
1.6 0.9 1.0
0.7
1.6 0.9 0.4
N -
N - 2
N - 3
N - 14
N - 5
ION 16N 20N 22N 24N - 26N 28N 30N 32N
FREQUENCY EFFECT [flPPJ IN '/. FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPPJ IN X
N -
N - 2
N - 3
N - H .
N - 5
2.0 2.4 O.S
1.2 2.9
NR 2.4
1.0
1.1
N -
N - 2
N - 3
N -
N - 5
DWG. NO.- I.P.- 5461 -li
NENCGNEX CRNRDIRN EXPLGRRTIGN LTD.CRNRDORE OPTION, TELEPHONE LRKE
STURGEON LRKE RRER PflTRICIR M.D., ONTflRIO
LINE NO.- 68H (EXTENSION)
ELECTRODE CONFIGURflTION -*-X-x —— NX —— *-*-X-*
FT PT
PLOTTING POINT X * 200'
SURFflCE PROJECTION OF flNOMflLOUS ZONES
PROBflBLE m inimum POSSIBLE x xx x x
FREQUENCIES: Q.31-5.Q HZ
NOTEt CONTOURS RT LOGflRITHMIC INTERVflLS 1.-1.5-2.-3.-5.-7.5-10
DflTE SURVEYED: MOB 1971
McPHflR GEOPHYSICSINDUCED POLflRIZRTION RND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
NOTEi THIS PLOT HflS PflOOUCEO WITH RN IBM 360/65 COMPUTER flND R CftLCOMP PLOTTER
N - 5
N - U
N - 3
N - 2
N - l
635 NR NR
1005
1745
N - 5
N - 4
N - 3
N - 2
N - l
RESISTIVITY (flPPJ IN OHM FEET / RESISTIVITY tflPPJ IN OHM FEET /
3S 2S IS IN 2N 3Niiiiiimiiiiiiiiiiimiiin
METflL FflCTOR (flPP.)
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - 4
N - 5
METflL FflCTOR (flPP.)
NEC
NR NR
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - U
N - 5
33 . 23 13.. OJ———————————————L-
IN 2N J—
3N
FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPPJ IN X FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPPJ IN Y.
N -
N - 2
N - 3
N -
N - 5
2.5 1.9
1.8
t.6
2. S 2.
MEG
A O.J
1.3 TL TL
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
52G15SWa026 52GI5SW8837 BELL LAKE 250
DWG, NO.- I.P.- 5461- [2
NEWCGNEX CRNRDIRN EXPLGRRTIGN LTD.CflNflDORE OPTION. TELEPHONE LflKE
STURGEON LRKE flREfl
PflTRICIfl M.D., ONTflRIO
LINE NO.- 68H
ELECTRODE CONFIGURflTION *-X-**——NX——*-*-X-*
\ ^\ ^
\. S^ S
PLOTTING \ /'POINT —*-X X = 100*
SURFflCE PROJECTION j(. OF flNOMflLOUS ZONES \
PROBflBLE m inimum POSSIBLE ' ' ' "
FREQUENCIESt Q.31-5.Q HZ
NOTEt CONTOURS flT LOGflRITHMIC INTERVflLS 1.-1.5-2.-3.-5.-7.5-10
DflTE SURVEYED! flPfl 1971
flPPROVED: *
DflTE (
•W;.
McPHRR GEOPHYSICSINDUCED POLflRIZflTION flND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
NOTEi THIS PLOT MRS PRODUCED WITH flN IBN 3SO/6S COMPUTEfl RND fl CftLCOHP PLOTTER
N - 5
N -
N - 3
N - 2
N -
3420 f 2250 2710 2580 . 3050 3850 , , . 1390 . 1800 . 2550 2989 v 3750 3810 1764 , , 3389 .2800 2870 , y 1090 v . 2710 . 1550
3400 X 2430 2860 2860 2100
1610 X, 2210 2707 2640 2660
1320 1740
1315
N - 5
N -
N - 3
N - 2
N -
RESISTIVITY (flpp.) IN OHM FEET f RESISTIVITY (flPP.J IN OHM FEET / 2*
16S 123 l OS , 83 6S 23 O 2N 6N . 8N ION 12N 14N 16N9 * * J* J J S
18N—i—
20N 22N 24N 26N 28N—t
lllllllllllllllllll
METflL FflCTOR (HPP.) METflL FflCTOR IflPPJ
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - 14
N - 5
2.9 2.3
NEC
O.B 0.4
0.6
0.1 0.4 0.9 0.9
Q. 5
1.4 1.2 1-1 4.4
1.0 X 0.7
0.4 0.6 0.3 0.8 0.6
0.6
.7 //'i.,
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - U
N - 5
16S 143 J2S IDS 83 6S 4S 2S 2N 6N . 8N ION 12N -- 14N . 16N ., 18N , '- 20N 24N 26N 28N
FREQUENCY EFFECT tflPP.) IN X FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPP.) IN X
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - 4
N - 5
4.7 5.1 2.2 v H.l 3.8 v 2.H
NEC
0.5
2.6 . l.B 1.6 1.5
1.2 \ . 1 .9
1.6 1.5
2.8 2.6
3.1
3.1 3.6 , 2.6 2.7
2.3 2.3 S 1 .7 f- 1 .0
2.4 \ 3.0 3.1 3.0 \ l 1 .7 1.8 1.9 S 2 .9
N - 5
N - 4
N - 3
N - 2
N - 1-,
2105 2455 , 1715 1 835 , 1400 ^ v 2510 1600
2220 1125
2130
1250 1270
1260
RESISTIVITY (flPP.) IN OHM FEET /
1705
RESISTIVITY (flPPJ IN OHM FEET / 2*
N - 5
N - U
N - 3
N - 2
N - l
403. 383- 363 34S 323 303 283 26S 243 223 203 183 165 143
METflL FflCTOR (flPPJ METflL FflCTOR (flPPJ
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - 4
N - 5
0.8 0.6 0,6 0.6 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.9
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0,6 O.H 0,4
0.7
0.6 0.2
1.4 , 0.4
0,6
0.5 0.8 0.1 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.9
0.5 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.3 NR 0.9
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - li
N - 5
40S 38S 36S 34S. 323 303 288 26S 2U8 203 183 163 143
FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPP,) IN 7.
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - H
N - 5
i.o 0.8 0.6 0,6 0.7 0.1 0.3 O.U 0.3
FREQUENCY EFFECT tflPP.) IN 7.
0.8 0.7
1.1
1.1
1.0 S 0.9
0.9 0.8 i 1 .3 l 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.8
1.4 A 0.1 0.9 0.9
O.B
0.4
0.6 0.8
0.8 0.2 1.0
1.4
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - 14
N - 5
DWG. NO.- I.P.- 5461- 14
NEWCONEX CRNflDIflN EXPLORflTION LTD.CflNflDORE OPTION, TELEPHONE LflKE
STURGEON LRKE RREfl
PRTRICIfl M.D., ONTRRIO
LINE NO.- . 72W (EXTENSION).
ELECTRODE CONFIGURflTION •*-X-**——NX——**-X-*
V
\ s\ s\ s
PLOTTING \ s 'POINT —*-X X = 200*
SURFRCE PROJECTION OF RNOMflLOUS ZONES
DEFINITE ——M——PROBABLE iiniMiitiiiiiPOSSIBLE s s s s
FREQUENCIES: 0.31-5.0 HZ
NOTE: CONTOURS RT LOGflRITHMIC INTERVflLS 1.-1.5-2.-3.-S.-7.5-10 DflTEi
McPHRR GEOPHYSICSINDUCED POLRRIZflTION RND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
NOTE* THIS PLOT MRS PRODUCED WITH RN IBM 360/65 COMPUTER RNO fl CflLCOMP PLOTTER
N - 5
N -
N - 3
N - 2
N -
7410 . , 2900
7279 6640 \ 3140
527U 5730
4290 6200 / 3700
N - 5
N - 4
N - 3
N - 2
N -
RESISTIVITY (flPPJ IN OHM FEET / 2 n
53 .. 43 33 . 23 IS 2N 3N
RESISTIVITY (fiPP.J IN OHM FEET / 2 n
5N 6N 7N 8N
METflL FRCTOR (flPP.) MET9L FRCTOR (RPPJ
N -
N - 2
N - 3
N -
N - 5
0.4 0.3
0.4 0.5
2.4 2.1 v 3.9 , , , 1.3
0.3 0.5 NEC
0.3 NEC 0.7
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - 4
N - 5
53 43 38 23 13 O IN 2N 3N 4N 6N 7N 8N
FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPPJ IN X FREQUENCY EFFECT (RPPJ IN X
N -
N - 2
N - 3
L.9
52G15SW002G S2G15SW0037 BELL LAKE 360
N -
N - 2
N - 3
N -
N - 5
DWG. NO.- I.P.- 5461-15
NEWCONEX CflNRDIAN EXPLORATION LTD.CRNADORE OPTION, TELEPHONE LflKE
STURGEON LRKE RREfl PRTRJCIfl M.D.. ONTRRIO
LINE NO.- 72W
ELECTRODE CONFIGURflTION -•-X-** —— NX —— **-X-^
PLOTTING \ , 'POINT — > X X = 100'
SURFflCE PROJECTION (OF flNOMflLOUS ZONES {(* ^AY j ^ , \
•A,"-., l - 'W? i . DEFINITEPROBflBLE iMiiniiiiiHi POSSIBLE x xxxx
FREQUENCIES: D.31-5.Q HZ
NOTEt CONTOURS flT LOGflRITHMIC INTERVflLS 1.-1.5-2.-3.-5.-7.5-10
DflTE SURVEYED t
RPPROVED:
DflTEt
McPHflR GEOPHYSICSINDUCED POLRRIZRTION RND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
NOTEi THIS PLOT MRS PRODUCED WITH flN IBM 360/65 COMPUTER RND fl CflLCOMP PLOTTER
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - li
N - 5
DWG. NO.- I.P.- 5461-13
NEWCONEX CRNRDIRN EXPLORATION. LTD.CRNRDORE OPTION, TELEPHONE LRKE
STURGEON LRKE RREfl PRTRICIR M.D., ONTRRIO
LINE NO.- 72W
ELECTRODE CONFIGURflTION *-X-**——NX——**-X-*-
' i*L
S S .
PLOTTING POINT X =
SURFflCE PROJECTION OF flNOMftLOUS HONES
PROBflBLE iiiiiiMiiiiiit POSSIBLE x x xxx
7V7-,
FREQUENCIES^ 0.31-5.0 H?
NOTEi CONTOURS RT LOGflRITHMIC INTERVflLS 1.-1.5-2.-3.-5.-7.5-10
DflTE SURVEYED: MflR 1971
DflTE:
McPHflR GEOPHYSICSINDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
NOTEi THIS PLOT MRS PRODUCED WITH RN IBM 360/65 COMPUTER RND fl CflLCOMP PLOTTER
N -
5
N -
li
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
NR
NR26
10NR
2370
NR3300
NR29
60NR
3830
NR
3600
4200
NR
NR
1070
m
3470
NR
1780
NR
2U10
NR
NR
NR
635
3210
^ 2180
. 32
10
NR16
90
NR
2060
22
2046
5
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
.) IN
OHM
FEE
T X
2ir
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
tfl
PP
J IN
OHM
FEE
T X
383
, 36
S323
303
. 28S
26S
. 245..
22S
. .
20S
, IBS
163
- l US
, 123
. 103
83
. 63
2S
O6N
8N
ION
12N
UN
16N
18N
20N
22N
24N
26N
28N
30N
s s
s s
s s
sii
iiii
iiii
iiii
mii
mii
iiii
iiii
iiu
iv
MET
RL F
ftCTO
R (fl
PP
JM
ETflL
FflC
TOR
(ftPP
.)
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
li
N -
5
l'9
l-*
0-7
v 1-
0 ,
0,9
0.9
NR
MB
0.2
0.8
t-1
- 1-
5 ,
, 0.
9 fc
1.1
x 0.
7 0.
3 0.
9 0,
5 O.
H 0.
8 0.
5 v
1.9
1.8
^ 2.
82.
8
I.O
1.0
f
0.2
0.
6 0.
80.
60.
9 0.
9NR
0.7
0.
7 0.
8 0.
1.4
3.8
1.3
NR
3.3
, 2,
8
4.8
1.7
NR
NR0.
3NR
NR
NR
0,5
NR0.
7 NR
0.7
NR
1.0
. NR
0.
6NR
NR
NR0.
7NR
1.1
NR1.
2NR
NR
NR3.
3NR
1.1
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
38S
36S
3MS
. .
323
,,
303
. 28
326
3 34
3 22
S .
. 20
318
S14
312
3 ,
103
83
., 6S
US
2SUN
W
**
-
'ON
12N
, l U
N 16
N 18
N 20
N 22
N
2*W
26
N 28
N SO
N
DWG.
N
O.-
I.P
.-
5461
-16
NEWC
ONEX
CflNflDIflN
EXPLORflTION LT
D.Cf
lNflD
ORE
OPT
ION
. TE
LEPH
ONE
LRKE
STUR
GEON
Lf
lKE
flREf
l
PflT
RIC
Ifl M
.D.,
ONT
flRIO
LIN
E
NO
.-
.76W
ELEC
TROD
E CONFIGURflTION
•*-X
-x*—
—NX—
—**-
X-*-
PLOTTING
/-PO
INT
—*X X
* 200'
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF f
lNOM
ftLOU
S ZO
NES /
DEFIN
ITE
MAY
l 21
97PR
OBAB
LE
POSS
IBLE
s
s s
s s
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S:
Q.3
1-5
.Q
HZ
OflT
E SU
RVE
YED
:
flPPR
OVE
Di
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
.) IN
X.
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
.) IN
X
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
2-0
2-7
i.o
^ 1.
92.
3
0-5
X\
1.7
\
, 2.
1
0.8
Z. O
1.7
1.9
4.8
, 2.
5
1.7
1.7
2.0
2.3
2.6
NR
3.0
, 2.
6 2.
6 ,
3.5
v 2.
5 4.
83'
9 -
2'7
2'3
v v
5,7
2.9
2.2
, 3.
6 .
2.2
2.3
2.8
, 1.
8 ^
1.3
2.6
MR3.
1 3.
;1.
8 1.
81.
9
2.7
3.6
2.8
NR
NR2
.3NR
2.0
NR
2.6
f 3.2
2.8
NRNR
2.5
2.
2.1
NR
1.6
\
1.1
1.8
NR
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
14
N -
5
NOTE
: CO
NTOU
RS
RT
LOG
ARIT
HMIC
IN
TER
VflL
S1.
-1.5
-2.-
3.-5
.-7.
5-10
DflT
E:
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SINDUCED
POLR
RIZf
lTION
flND
RES
ISTI
VITY
SU
RVEY
NOTEi
THIS PUJT MR
S PRODUCED WITH W IB
M 360/65 COMP
UTE* WND
fl CflLCOMP P
LOTTEft
DWG.
NO
,- 1^
.
NEWC
ONEX
Cf
lNfl
DIRN
EXPLORflTION L
TD.
CfiN
flDOR
E O
PTIO
N,
TELE
PHON
E Lf
lKE
STUR
GEON
LflK
E RR
Efl
PflT
RIC
Ifl M
.D..
ONT
flRIO
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
J IN
OHM
FEE
T /
2nR
ES
ISTI
VIT
Y
tflP
PJ
IN
OHM
FEE
T X
2n
20N
21
N
22N
2
3N
2i
lN
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
.)EL
ECTR
ODE
CONF
IGUR
flTIO
N NX
PLOT
TING
\
,'PO
INT
—*
X =
100*
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
flNOH
flLOU
S ZO
NES
DEF
INIT
E PR
OBf
lBLE
PO
SSIB
LE
ss
ss
s
DflT
E SU
RVEY
ED.
MflR
19
71
FREQ
UENC
T EF
FECT
(fl
PP
.) IN
7.
FREQ
UENC
Y E
FFE
CT
NOTEs
CONT
OURS
fl
T LO
GflR
ITHM
IC
INTE
RVfl
LS
1.-1
.5-2
.-3.
-5.-
7.5-
10
1.1
y
i.M
cPH
flR
GEO
PHYS
ICS
INDU
CED
POLf
lRIZ
flTIO
N P
ND R
ES
ISTI
VIT
Y S
URVE
Y
NOTE
. TH
IS P
LOT
MRS
PflO
OUCE
O MI
TH R
N IB
M 3
60/8
5 CO
MPUT
ER W
O R
CfL
CO
f PL
OTTE
R
DWG.
N
O.-
I.p.-
^5461-
NEWCON
EX C
flNf
lDIf
lN
EXPL
GRfl
TION
LTD.
CflN
flDOR
E O
PTIO
N,
TELE
PHON
E Lf
lKE
STUR
GEON
LflK
E- f
lREf
l P
flTR
ICIfl
M.D
., O
NTflR
IO
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(f
lPP
J IN
OHM
FE
ET /
STT
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
.) IN
OHM
FEE
T
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
.)
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
.)EL
ECTR
ODE
.CO
NFIG
URflT
ION
NX
PLO
TTIN
G \
sPO
INT
—^
X =
200*
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF f
lNOM
flLOU
S ZO
NES
DEF
INIT
E j!
PRO
BflB
LE
min
imum
\\
-g
POSS
IBLE
FREQ
UENC
IES
SURV
EYED
:
flPPR
OVE
D:FR
EQUE
NCY
EFFE
CT
(flPP
.) IN
X
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
J IN
XNO
TE:
CONT
OURS
flT
LO
GflR
ITHM
IC
INTE
RVf
lLS
1.-
1.5
-2.-
3.-
5.-
7.5
-10
^
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SIN
DUCE
D PO
LflR
IZflT
ION
flN
D R
ES
ISTI
VIT
Y
SURV
EYNO
TEi
THIS
PLO
T M
flS P
RODU
CED
MIT
H flN
I8H
360
/65
COMP
UTER
RNO
R C
flLCO
MP P
LOTT
ER
N -
5
N -
14
N -
3
N -
2
N -
2500
NR
1700
NRNR
NR
3750
7300
NR
9750
NR
6960
NR
6200
NR
maOO
Nfl
8000
NR
1040
0 NR
7600
NR6580
NR
5580
NR
5790
NR
2220
6401
3270
3480
^ 2260
^ 3010
4050
. 3700 \
f 9000
3950
2700
2500
\
3650
6700
66
00
. 80
20
X
6400
5550
7100
6010
8490
\
6500
13500
13500
1000
0 13
600
1230
0 11
000
1040
0
lOBO
O 13
500
1100
0 S
15600
16900
\
1410
0 12
400
1070
0 10
700
1190
0 14
700
4470
3050
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(f
lPP
J IN
OH
M FE
ET /
2n
423
403
—i—
38S
365
—i—
343
—i—
325
30S
283
. 26
S 243
22S
203
183
163
143
123
l OS
83
. 63
2S
O2N
6N
8N
ION
12
N
4450
32
00
3100
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(f
lPP
J IN
OH
M FE
ET
S 2n
16N
18
N
20N
22
N
24N
26
N
FflC
TOR
(flP
PJ
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP.)
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
14
N -
5
2.7
1.3
1.3
- ^
0.7
Q.S
0.
3 4
1.2
y 0.
6 0.
9 0.
2 0.
5 0.
4 0.
2
0,3
0,1
1,3
1.1
] 0.
1 0-
4
NR
0.6
0.1
0.9
0.5
0.7
0,2
NR
NR
NRNR
NR
0.4
NR
NR
NR
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.7
0.9
0,3
NR
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.2
NR
0,2
0.3
X
1.0
NR0.
3NR
0.
3 NR
0.
6 NR
0.
4 NR
0.
50.4
NR
0.6
NR
0.4
NR
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
14
N -
5
403
383
363
343
323
303
.28
324
3 .2
25
203
. 18
316
3 -J
143 i
123
103 i —
BS
.63
-4
3
232N
.
. 4N
.
6NIO
N12
N 14
N 16
N 18
N20
N 22
N 24
N 26
N
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
tfl
PP
.) IN
XFR
EQUE
NCY
EFFE
CT
(flP
PJ
IN X
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
1.7
1.8
. 2.
2 v
3.6
^ 2.
0
1.9
1.6
X f
0.
21.
3
1.7
1.7
. 2.
2 ,.
. v
0.8
. ,
. 2.
3 2.
3 1.
6 y
2.5
2.0
2.7
2.0
2.9
3.6
4.3
3.2
1.3
3.0
4,4
U.I
3.8
v 2,
6 ,
3.5
3.3
3.2
3.0
. .
. ^
, 0.
9
2.3
0.3
NR1.
0NR
NR
m2.
8NR
NR
NR2.
8
2.8
. .
2.2
Nfi
3.6
3.8
2.0
m4.
1NR
4.5
4.0
- 4.
S
W
3.6
3.4
3.8
NR3.
SNR
2.9
3.9
3.3
NR
2.2
N3.
0
3.5
2.3
NR
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
b
DWG.
N
O.-
I.P
.- 5
46
1-1
9
NEWC
GNEX
Cf
lNfl
DIfl
N EXPLGRflTIGN LTD.
CflN
flDO
RE
OPT
ION
, TE
LEPH
ONE
Lf
lKE
STUR
GEON
LR
KE
RREf
i
PflT
RIC
Ifl
M.D
., O
NTf
lRIO
. LI
NE
N
O.-
ELEC
TROD
E CO
NFIG
URflT
ION
*-X
^*—
—N
X—
—x-X
-*
PLOTTI
NG
POINT — *
'* 20
0'
SURF
flCE
PROJECTION
^ OF f
lNOMflLOUS
DEFINI
TE
PROBflBLE
POSS
IBLE
FREQ
UENC
IES:
Q.
31-5
.Q H
ZD
flTE
SUR
VEYE
D:
MflR
19
71
flPPR
OVE
Di
NOTE
: CO
NTOU
RS
RT
LOG
flRIT
HMIC
IN
TERV
flLS
1.-
i.5-2
.-3.-
5.-
7.5
-10
DflT
E:
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SIN
DUCE
D POLRRIZflTIQN
flND RESI
STIVIT
Y SURVEY
NOTE
t TH
IS P
UJT
HflS
PRO
DUCE
D W
ITH
RN
IBM
360
/65
COMP
UTER
flN
D H
CRLC
OHP
PLOT
TER
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
1800
NR
1680
NR
7200
W
24
50
NR
1050
0NR
3700
NR
5350
NR
1290
032
60
NR
8550
NR
82
30
NR
8800
NR
97
50NR
1100
0 NR
9610
NR
4880
948
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(f
lPP
J IN
OH
M FE
ET /
2n
845
4490
46
20
, ,
, 12
200 X
\
5780
^
v .
2320
0 \
1720
0 , ,
, f
4800
S
S
9570
.
6900
X
84
10
f 65
00
4940
1070
027
800
5520
/
4790
30
30
\
5390
1500
0 ,
1440
0 12
700
, 16
600
\ L
85
00
, U
OOO
S
1600
0 ,
, ,
5130
f
7780
1510
0 16
300
1510
0 S
10
300
1240
0 S
15
000
6200
X"
3500
N -
5
N -
U
N -
3
N -
2
N -
1483
14
63
1443
.
423
403
383
. 36
3 34
5 32
3 30
5 .
285.
.
26S
245
22S
'•f S
f
X*
llll
llll
lltll
lIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIH
IIIIIIIIf S S S S S S
J————————————————l————————————————l
S S f S IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV'
IBS
—t—
IBS
—t—
l US
'.125
—t—
IDS
8363
US
232N
6N
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(f
lPP
.)
IN
OHM
FEET
/
2n
8N
l ON
12N
14N
16
N
18N
20
N
22N
METf
lL F
flCT
OR
(flPP.)
MET
RL F
flCTO
R (R
PPJ
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
2.5
, 3.
62.
0
2.0
0.7
0,5
0.3
0.2
0.1
0,6
0,3
0.6
0,7
0.6
0.5
1.0
X
0.9
NR
0.3
0.1
0.2
0,7
0.4
0.6
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.7
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.2
0.5
0.1
0.5
NR
0.2
0.4
0.5
1.2
NR1.
5NR
0.
4NR
1.2
NR
0.2
NR1,
2NR
0.3
NR
0.2
NR
0.8
NR
0,3
NR0.
2NR
0.
40.
7NR
0.
3 NR
0.
4NR
0.7
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
S
483
463
44S
——
L—42
S40
S -
383
363
343.
323
303
28
3-
26
3-
245
223
205,
18S
—i
IBS i
143
'- 12
310
383
'
63
43
. 23
2N
4N6N
8N -t—IO
N 12
N14
N.16
N—
t18
N i20
N 22
N
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
Cf
iPPJ
IN
XFR
EQUE
NCY
EFFE
CT
(flPP
.) IN
X
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
2.1
2.5
1.6
^ 1,
3 .
v 2.
0 2.
63.
8
1.9
^ 2.
3 2,
0 \
1.7
\
2.7
S
3.3
2.3
2.5
NR3.
22.
9
2.2
, 3.
1 3.
1 3.
5
2.9
\
3.0
U.3
3.5
lU
.I1.
8
3.7
v. 2.
3 ,
. U
.O
3.5
3.2
. ,
1.7
, 2
.5
x 1.
83
.73
.77.
0 ,
3.1
3.2
3.5
3.7
3.9
S
2.2
2.
42.
0
1.6
NR2.
1NR
2.6
NR2.
81.
6NR
U.I
U
.I
3.6
4.5
3.8
3.0
U.3
v
v ,
v
0.8
V*
NR3.
63.
6
6.8
NR2.
94.
0NR
3.5
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
DWG.
NO
.- I.
P.-
54
61-2
0
NEWC
GNEX
CflNflDIflN
EXPLGR
flTI
GN LTD.
CRNf
lDOR
E O
PTIO
N.
TELE
PHO
NE
LflK
E
STUR
GEON
Lf
lKE
flREf
l
PR
TRIC
Ifl
M.D
., O
NTf
lRIO
LIN
E
NO
.-
88W
ELEC
TROD
E CO
NFIG
URflT
ION
-*-X
-*-*
——
NX
——
x
\ s
•\ s
•\ s
\ s
PLOT
TING
\
,'PO
INT
—*X
X
s' 2
00'
SURF
flCE
PROJE
CTIO
N OF f
lNOMRLOUS
ZONE
^'j
PROB
flBLE
u
iiiiii
iiiiii
i PO
SSIB
LE
s s
s s
s
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S:
0.3
1-5
.0
HZ
NO
TE:
CONT
OUR
S RT
LO
GflR
ITH
MIC
IN
TER
VflL
S
1.-
1.5
-2.-
3.-
5,-
7.5
-10
DflT
E SU
RVE
YED
: MR
R 19
71
flPPR
OVE
D:
DflT
E:
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SIN
DUCE
D PO
LflR
IZflT
ION
flN
D R
ES
ISTI
VIT
Y
SURV
EY
NOTE
i TH
IS P
LOT
MRS
PROD
UCED
WIT
H AN
IB
M 36
0/65
COM
PUTE
R flN
D fl
CflLC
OMP
PLOT
TER
N -
5
N -
14
N -
3
N -
2
N -
1720
K
1160
3950
1200
1550
3800
1130
4700
3510
S
f
9300
1270
7550
3584
41
28
N -
5
N -
14
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
RESI
STIV
ITY
(flPP.)
IN O
HM F
EET
/ 2*
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(f
lPP
J IN
OH
M
FEET
/
2n*
355
ays
333
325
313
303
293
285
273
265
25S
243
23S
22S
213
203
S f f
METR
L FR
CTOR
(flPP.)
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
.)
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
li
N -
5
1.6
^ 1.
2O
.S3,
9 3.
50.
5
0.3
0,3
NR
0.9
0.3
2.4
0.9
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
14
N -
5
353
343
333
323
313
303
293
283
263
253
243
233
——
L—21
3 20
3
FREQUENCY
EFFECT
IflP
P.)
IN X
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
J IN
X
N -
N -
2
N -
3
2.S
f 3
.U1.
6U.
U ,
2.2
3.0
3.4
3.5
l 2.5
3.3
U.I
3.1
\
2.9
2.4
. 1.
82.
0NR
2.7
2.4
2.6
3.3
3.0
4,1
3.6
NR2.
0 2.
2NR
2.1
2.8
4.0
S2G15SW0026
S2GTSSW0037 BELL
LAKE
280
N -
N -
2
N -
3
N -
N -
5
DWG.
N
O.-
I.R
.-
5461
-21
NEWC
GNEX
CflNflDIflN
EXPLGRflTIGN LTD.
CflN
flDOR
E O
PTIO
N,
TELE
PHON
E Lf
lKE
STUR
GEON
Lf
lKE
flREf
l
PflT
RIC
Ifl M
.D.,
ONT
flRIO
LIN
E
NO
.- 88
W
ELEC
TRO
DE
CO
NFI
GU
RflT
ION
*-
X-*
-*—
——
NX
——
s-e
-X-*
N
S•^
s•^
s\
sPL
OTTI
NG \
,'PO
INT
—*X
X
= 10
0'
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
fY "
OF f
lNOM
flLOU
S ZO
NES
il_
__
__
U #
PRO
BflB
LE
IHIII
IIIIII
III
V1'7'
P
OS
SIB
LE
ss
ss
s
^
l ?1
972
^/;
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S:
0.3
1-5
.0
HZ
NO
TE:
CONT
OUR
S RT
LO
GflR
ITH
MIC
IN
TER
VflL
S
1.-
1.5
-2.-
3.-
5.-
7.5
-10
DflT
E SU
RVE
YED
: M
flR
1971
DflT
Ei
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SIN
DUCE
D PO
LflR
IZflT
ION
flN
D R
ES
ISTI
VIT
Y
SURV
EY
NOTEi
THIS
PL
OT HR
S PRODUCED W
ITH
RN IBM
360/65 C
OMPU
TER
RND
fl CflLCOMP PL
OTTE
R
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
1480
NR
3650
NR
4100
NR
5920
NR6280
NR
9000
NR
13300
NR
I786S
NR11
622
NR
7790
NR
3220
NR
U630
2069
865
14770
3*400
X
2960
v 4650
4150
3190
2520
2890
15228
1550
0 17600
1550
0 .
14100
11200
17865
S
13251
\
17865
12963
2020
2600
2330
3460
4100
NR
3430
I960
2800
A l
5160
1940
\
S
"4570
\
5390
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
DWG.
NO
.- T
-P.-
5461
-22
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(R
PP
J IN
OHM
FE
ET /
2*
483
1465
UU
S .
.42
3
403
38S
363
343
323
303
283
263
2143
.
223
20S
18S
.163
l US
123
103
8363
ys
.2
3
^ O
2N
. 4N
6N
8N
IO
N
12N
______l W
X
X1
X
X
X
Xs r s
s s
f x
iiii
iiin
iiif
in
n
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(R
PP
J IN
OHM
FEE
T X
2n
16N
______18N
______20N
______22N
______2U
N
MET
flL
FRCT
OR
(flP
PJ
NEWCON
EX Cn
NflD
IflN
EXPLORflTION LTD.
CflN
flDO
RE
OPT
ION
, TE
LEPH
ONE
LflK
E
STUR
GEON
LflK
E flR
Efl
PflT
RIC
Ifl
M.D
., O
NTflR
IO
LIN
E
NO
.-
92
"
MET
flL F
flCTQ
R (f
lPP
J
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
S
2.9
, ,
1.2
v US
, 1.
2 0.8
k 1.2
1,3
. ,
0.9
fc ,
US
. .
. 3.4
. .
, ,
0.5
. 1.1
> 0.1
0.1
0.1
_____^x*
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.3
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.5
1.3
1.1
X^
0.7
0.6
0,7
X
1.1
0.5
0.7
0.4
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0,1
NR
1.1
NR
0.5
NR
0.6
NR
O.U
NR
0.3
NR0.3
NR
0.2
NR0.
2NR
0.1
NR
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.5
0,5
0.3
0.7
0.7
0.2
NR
0.5
NR
0.4
NR
0.6
NR
1,0
1.1
0.8
0.6
0.4
NR
0-6
0,6
0.6
0.7
0.7
NR
0.8
N -
l
N -e
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
ELECTR
ODE
CONFlGURflTION
**-X-x——NX——*-*-X-*
PLOTTING
POINT
\ x
\ x
*X
X =
200'
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
H M
AY i
2197
2 OF
flN
OMRL
OUS
ZONE
S
PRO
BflB
LE
min
imum
PO
SSIB
LE
x x
x x
x
463
46S
443
423
403
383
363
343
32S
303
28S
26S
24S
223
203
-,
183
163
143
123
103
.83
6343
. 23
2N
: 4N
6N
8N
ION
. 12N
14N
- 16
N18N
20N
22N
24N
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(f
lPP
J IN
X
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
J IN
X
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
1.9
, ^
2.2
2.0
^ 3,
0
2.2
2.5
2.4
2.3
. 3.
42.
62.
0 2.
S
2.5
S
3.2
3.
2 ^
2.2
/
1.7
1.9
3.1
2.
2.0
1.9
, 1.
1-
2.2
2.5
\ X
1.0
l.U
0.7
y ,
, 2
,1*
r/
2.5
2.S
,
3.8
3.8
"4-0
,
, 1.
5
1.6
1.9
NR3.
32.
6NR
1.9
NR3
.22.
0a.
ttNR
1.6
NR2.
3NR
1.6
9 \
2.5
1.7
3.6
3.1*
i.i
3.7
NR1.
5 1.
81.
2
2.4
2.0
NR2.
8
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
2510
21
0087
8 ,
. .
. .
SSOO
3US
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
tfl
PP
.) IN
OHM
FEE
T /
2" 323
31S
569\
3000
am
489
650
559
NR
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
303
——L
RESI
STIV
ITY
(flP
PJ
IN O
HM F
EET
/ 2"
293
28S
273
26S
253
243
233
223
J S S
S S S
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
.)M
ETflL
Ff
lCTO
R (f
lPP
J
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
0.7
0.9
NR0.
3
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
323
313
. 30
3 29
Sae
s26
S ,..
253
23S
223
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
.) IN
X
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(f
lPP
J IN
X
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
2.8
2.7
2.8
2.S
2.1
1.7
, 2.
0
1.2
2.7
1.8
1.6
1.7
1.0
1.2
NR
1.0
NR1.
8
N -
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
DWG.
NO
.- I.
p.-
546
1 -2
3
NEWC
GNEX
Cf
lNRD
IflN
EX
PLOR
RTIG
N LT
D.Cf
lNflD
QRE
O
PTIO
N,
TELE
PHON
E Lf
lKE
STUR
GEON
Lf
lKE
flREf
l
PflT
RIC
Ifl M
.D.,
ONT
flRIO
LIN
E
NO
.- 92
H
ELECTRODE
CONFlGURflTION
-*-X-x——NX——IK-X-*
V
\ s
\ x
:PL
OTTI
NG \
xxPO
INT —*X X
= 10
0'
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF R
NOMf
lLOU
S ZONES
PRO
BflB
LE
min
imum
PO
SSIB
LE
x xx x
x
FREQ
UENC
IES:
0.3
1-5
.0
HZ
NOTE
: CO
NTOU
RS
RT
LOG
RR
ITH
MIC
IN
TER
VRLS
1
.-1
.5-2
.-3
.-5
.-7
.5-1
0
DflT
E
flPPR
OVE
tf:
v,x
J r
DflT
E:
McPHRR GEOPHYSICS
INDU
CED
POLflRIZflTION f
lND RE
SIST
IVITY
SURVEY
NOTE
i TH
IS P
LOT
MRS
PROD
UCED
HIT
H P
W
I8H
360/
65 C
OMPU
TER
flit)
fl
CflL
COMP
PLO
TTER
N - 5
N -
U
N -
3
N - 2
N -
l
1630
NR
3U60
NR
10700
NR
6000
NR
5400
NR
5510
NR
5360
NR
3120
0 NR
2SOOO
NR
3000
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(R
PP
J IN
OHM
FEE
T /
2ir
520
1160
0 ^
. v
U760
3250
3U90
4930
3220
l6000
^ 2seQ
0 28600
v v
11600
16200
, ^
v 6200
2670
3910
\ / // 1600
014
500
r 26:
l \4890
\
2520
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
503
483
46S
443
423
, 40
S 38
S .
363
- 34
S
RESISTIVITY
(RPPJ
IN O
HM F
EET
/ 2n
3?S
30S
283.
263
243
223
203
IBS
163
143
12S
l OS
BS
6S
43
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
JM
ETflL
Ff
lCTO
R (f
lPP
J
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
2.5
2.1
. 3.4
. ,
. 1.2
0.7
0.4
0.2
. 1.7
0.3
v
1.9
1.8
0.7
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
1.3
1.4 ^\
1.7
l f
0.6
0,4
0.3
0.5
0.9
0.9
1.6
0.3
0.1
0.8
0,
8
0-8
O.U
0.2
0.1
0.1
NR0.
2NR
0.6
1.6
NR1.2
NR
0.2
NR
O.iJ
NR
0.4
NR
0.4
NR
0.6
NR0.
1NR
O.t
NR
O.U
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
503
483
, .
46S
- 443
. 423
. 403
383
363
343
323
303
. ,
283
, 263
.,.
243
223
203
183
163
..
143
123
103
8363
US
FREQUENCY
EFFE
CT (RPPJ
IN X
FREQ
UENC
Y EFFECT
(flP
PJ
IN X
N -
N -
2
N -
3
1.3
^ .
2.3
1.7
"*.0
3,2
9.2
2.0
v H.S
, .
t l.V
. ,
2.8
3.7
4.2
S
2.3
2.
9 2.4
2.8
S^
3.3
2.6
U.2
3.2
2.5
2.2
9-0
3.S
3.8
3.2
H.3
2.2
3.7
, ,
1.9
2.9
} 3.3
. N
-
3.S
NR2.7
m1.
6
2.0
3.9
2.2
tfft
1.3
52G15SW0026
52^155*0337
BELL LAKE
230
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
DWG.
NO
.- I.
P.- 5461-24
NEWC
GNEX
CRNflDIRN
EXPL
GRRTIG
N LTD.
CflN
flDO
RE O
PTIO
N,
TELE
PHON
E Lf
lKE
STUR
GEON
Lf
lKE
flREf
l
PflT
RIC
Ifl
M,D
., O
NTflR
IO
LIN
E
NO
.- 96
H
ELEC
TRO
DE C
ON
FlG
UR
flTIO
N
*-X
-**—
—N
X—
—*-
*-X
-*-
\ s ,' r
PLOT
TING
\
/'
f- POIN
T —*X X
* 20
0'
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF
flNO
MflL
OUS
ZO
NES
~
PRO
BflB
LE
mn
imiii
in
POSS
IBLE
x
x x
x x
FREQ
UENC
IES:
Q
.31-
5.Q
NOTE
: CO
NTOU
RS
flT
LOG
flRIT
HM
IC
INTE
RVf
lLS
1.-
1.5
-2.-
3.-
5.-
7,5
-10
DflT
E SU
RVEY
ED:
MflR
19
71
flPPR
OVE
D:
DflT
E:
McPH
RR GE
OPHY
SICS
INDU
CED
POLf
lRIZ
flTIO
N f
lND
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
SU
RVEY
WTE
i TH
IS P
LOT
HftS
PRO
DUCE
D W
ITH
AN
IBM
360/
65 C
flHPU
TER
flND
fl CTL
CO
MP
PLOT
TER
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S:
fl.a
i-5.0
HZ
NOTE
: CO
NTOU
RS
flT
LOGf
lRIT
HMIC
IN
TERV
flLS
l.
-l.5
-2.-
3.-5
.-7.
5-10
DflT
E Q
iBW
FYFn
^ .M
tffl
1971
'"+
S/,
DflT
E:
McPH
RR GE
OPHY
SICS
INDU
CED
POLR
RIZf
lTIO
N fl
ND R
ESISTIVITY SU
RVEY
NOTE
, TH
IS P
LOT
tWS
PMDU
CED
HITH
Wi
IBM
360/
6S C
OMPU
TER
*C B
CflL
COMP
PLO
TTER
n-5
n-4
n-3
n-2
n-
1080
12
75V
80
0 f 1
025
X
915
n-5
n-4 n-3
2 TT
(OH
M
FE
ET
)
8S
6S
n -
2-rr
(OH
M
FE
ET
]
*S
2S?N
4M
6N
BN
ION
J f S
f *
S
Ifil
18N
(MF
)Q
(M.F
.)
n-1.1
n-2
0.1
2,3
KE
G 0.^
0.
8 0.
9 O.
B
.5
0,3
0
.9
O.B
/i.*
A
0.7
n-3
n-4
n-5
0.2
0.
7 0.?
O
.*
0.5
O
.? l
I.*
1.3
0,3
0.2
0
.4 /
1.2
1.4
M
EG
HEG
0.1
0.1
n-l
n-2
n-3
n-4
1.2
1-1
n-5
2S8N —l—
10M
12
MU
N—
—i
UN
1
8K
F E
in 7
oF.
E in
n-
l
n-2
n-3
n-4
n-5
0.8
0.*
0
.3
(0-3
) 0.2
0
.5
0.8
0.
7
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.2
1.3
\
0-7
C.I
1-3
\
0.7
(0
.2)
MEG
1.1
1.1
1.2
0.2
0.5
N-5
N -
N-3
N-2
N -
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
J IN
OHM
FEE
T t
2n
MET
flL F
ftCTO
R (fl
PP
.)
N -
l
N-2
N-3
N -
U
N-5
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(ft
PP.)
IN X
N -
l
N-2
N-3
N -
U
N-5
N-5
N-3
N-2
N -
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(R
PPJ
IN O
HM F
EET
/
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
.)
N -
I
N-2
N-3
N-4
N-5
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
Cf
lPP,
) IN
X.
N -
N-2
N-3
52G15SK0026
52G15SW0037 BELL
LAKE
300
0.6
0.5
n-
l
-n-2
n-3
-n-4
-n-5
DW
G N
O.-
I.P
- 5
46
1-2
5
NE
WC
ON
EX
C
AN
AD
IAN
E
XP
LOR
ATI
ON
LT
D.
CA
NA
DO
RE
O
PTI
ON
, TE
LEP
HO
NE
LA
KE
STU
RG
EO
N
LAK
E
AR
EA
P
ATR
ICIA
M
.D.,
ON
TAR
IO
LIN
E
NO
.-
96W
(E
XTE
NS
ION
)
ELE
CT
RO
DE
C
ON
FIG
UR
AT
ION
K
PLO
TT
ING
P
OIN
TX
= 2
00
SU
RFA
CE
P
RO
JEC
TIO
N
OF
AN
OM
ALO
US
ZO
NE
S
,;
DE
FIN
ITE
PR
OB
AB
LEP
OS
SIB
LE
'V.
MAY
I ?1
37?
J]
~ C
- if
•rv
FR
EQ
UE
NC
IES
031-5
0 H
ZD
ATE
S
UR
VE
YE
AP
PR
OV
E
NO
TE
CO
NT
OU
RS
A
TLO
GA
RIT
HM
IC
INT
ER
VA
LS1
-1-5
-2-3
-5-7
-5-1
0D
AT
E
Mc
PH
AR
McP
HA
R
GE
OP
HY
SIC
SN
DU
CE
D
PO
LAR
IZA
TIO
N
AN
D
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
S
UR
VE
Y
1115
016
335
, .
v 60
U8
535
505
NR
603
2200
N-5
N -
N-3
N-2
N -
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
ffl
PP
J IN
OHM
FEE
T /
2n
49S
483
463
453
443
43S
423
413
403
393
383
37S
36S
35S
343
333
323
S S
f S
313
—l
MET
fiL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
J
NR
, 3.
3
3.0
2.5
, ,
, 0.
7 v
1.0
0.8
0.3
O.H
0.5
0.3
0.5
, 1.
3
0.6
0.9
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.3
f 1.
2
0.5
0.6
0.5
O.U
0.
4 0.
3 0.
2 0.
9
0.9
NR2,
00.
50.
5 NR
0.5
0.3
NR
0.2
0.6
N -
l
N-2
N-3
N -
14
N-5
483
U8S
U7S
.- I4
6S
. "4
5S
W3
U33
423
—i—
.H
IS .
1403
39
3 38
3 37
3.
363
3SS
34S
—t—
333
32S
31S
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
J IN
X
NH
2.0
1,9
l.S
2.3
2.2
2.7
2.9
2.9
f 3.6
,
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.8
1.9
1.3
2.0
2.9
NR
2.9
S
3.8
3.
0 X
2.
2
2.7
S
3.U
3.
8 3.
2
2.0
W
3.5
3,9
N -
l
N-2
N-3
N-4
N-5
DWG.
NO
.- I.
P.-
546
1-26
NEWC
ONEX
Cf
lNRD
IRN
EXPLGR
RTIO
N LTD.
CflN
flDO
RE O
PTIO
N, TE
LEPH
ONE
LRKE
STURGEON L
RKE
RRER
PRTRIC
Ifl
M.D.p
ONTRRIO
LINE NO.-..
96H
ELEC
TROD
E CO
NFIG
URAT
ION
•*-X
™**
——
NX
——
**-X
-*
\ y
PLOT
TING
\
s'
POIN
T —
*X
X s
SURF
flCE
PROJ
ECT
I ON
OF R
NQMH
LOUS
ZON
ES
DEF
INIT
E PR
OBflB
LE
POSS
IBLE
/
MAY
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S!
Q.3
1-5
.Q
HZ
NOTE
: CO
NTOU
RS
flT
LOG
flRIT
HMIC
IN
TERV
RLS
1.-
i.5
-2.-
3,-
5.-
7.5
-10
DflT
E SU
RVEY
ED i
flPPR
OVE
Dt
DflT
Er
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SIN
DUCE
D P
OLf
lRIZ
flTIO
N
RNO
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
SU
RVEY
NOTE
i TH
IS P
LOT
MRS
PROD
UCED
WIT
H flN
IB
H 36
0/85
COM
PUTE
R FM
D fl
CflLC
OHP
PLOT
TER
705
, .
, 15
00
3UOO
NR
4370
NR
9970
NR
5000
NR
2080
NR
4220
NR
4900
NR
28200
NR
29120
NR
1765
NR
960
805
790
3950
31
20
, ,
-894
0
3405
S
52
00
\
8060
5250
57
70
. .
. .
2524
0 f
3SUO
O M
H400
NR
H4
80
1305
1500
\\
4600
2240
0 25
000 \
3170
011
1013
60
1308
N-5
N -
N-3
N-2
N -l
SOS
483
46S
. U4
S 42
3 .
403
38S
36S
-34
3
. 32
3 30
3 .
285
- 26
S .
, 24
S ,..
. 22
3 ,
' 20
S -.
183
163
, 143
. 123
l OS
BS
63
43
23O
2Ns s s s s s s
RESI
STIV
ITY
(flP
P.)
IN OH
M FE
ET /
2n
6N
8N
ION
12N
lllllt
liliiiiiin
ir s
s s s s
s s
2.9
. 4.
0 ,.,s
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.8
0,2
0.8
v v
1.6
5.7
6.1
9.8
0.7
S
1.2
\
0.5
- 0.
3 0.
6 0.
5NR
2.7
0.5
NR
1.1
NR
0.3
NR
Q.7
NR
0.
8 NR
0-7
0.7
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
NR
0.
0.3
0.5
NR
0.1
MR0.
1 NR
0-s
0.2
NR
1.5
NEC
METf
lL F
ftCT
OR
(flP
P,)
0."4
O.Q
———
N -
l
——
——
——
——
N
-2
0.1
0,1
0.1
0,1
0.1
——
——
——
——
——
——
—
0.14
^,,,
x 7.
2 1.
3 0.
9 0,
2 0.
1 0.
2 V
\
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.8
0.5
0.2
0.6
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
N-3
N-4
N-5
DWG.
N
O.-
I.R
.-
5461-2
7
NEWC
ONEX
CRNRDIflN
EXPLORflTION LTD.
CflNRD
ORE
OPTION,
TELEPHON
E LRKE
-STURG
EON
LRKE R
REfl
PRTR
ICIf
l M.
D.,
ONTRRIO
LINE
NO
.- __lOQW
ELEC
TROD
E CO
NFIG
URflT
ION
*-X
-**—
—N
X—
—**
-X~
*
\ s
SOS
148S
U6
3l_
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
l14
2S
HOS
383
363
3US
.3
33
30
S 28
3 26
3 2Q
S 22
S 20
S -.
IBS
\ 16
S ,
IHS
12S
IDS
. 83
.,
63
. US
2S
O6N
8N
ION
12N
FREQUENCY
EFFECT
IflPP.)
IN X
2.3
3.2
^ 2.
1 v
3.0
3.7
' 6.
V
, ,
2.2
2.8
2.6
1.8
1.7
2.7
1.5
. .
3.1*
. .
1.1
, .
2.1
3.6
U.7
3.
8 3.
6 \
2.0
ffl
1.6
1.5
S
1.1
\ 7
2.
33.
0
3.S
^
2.
30.
3
t*. 2
NR
2.0 \\
1.3
t. 8
NR
V.7
NR
3.3
1.7
1.3
m
2.1
NR
2.
0 NR
3.
8 NR
0.
3
- O (9
J 7.
0.6
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.6
, i.
i
0.1
O.I
0.1
0.1
0.8
{ 1.
1
-0-8
0.
1 0.
1 0.
1 0.
2 0.
1
O.Z
O
.B
0.8
0.0
N -
l
N-2
N-3
N-4
N-5
PLO
TTIN
G \
,'PO
INT
—*-
X
X =
200*
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF R
NOM
flLOU
S ZO
NES
PRO
BflB
LE
iiiiii
nniii
ii PO
SSIB
LE
xx
xx
x
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S:
Q.3
1-5
.Q
HZ
DflT
E SU
RVE
YED
! M
flR
1971
flPPR
OVE
Dt
NOTE
: CO
NTOU
RS
flT
LOG
RRIT
HMIC
IN
TER
VflL
S 1.-
1.5
-2.-
3.-
5.-
7.5
-10
DflT
E t
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SIN
DUCE
D PO
LflR
IZflT
ION
flN
D R
ES
ISTI
VIT
Y
SURV
EY
NOTE
. TH
IS P
LOT
MRS
PROD
UCED
WIT
H RN
IB
M 3
60/6
5 CO
MPUT
ER f
lND
R C
flLC
ttT P
LOTT
ER
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
2820
879
2620
NR83
035
214
22
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
RESISTIVITY
IflPPJ
IN O
HM F
EET
X 2n
RESISTIVITY
(flPP.)
IN O
HM FEET X
2*
343 t—
33S
323
313
3QS
295
285
27S
265
255
24S
235
223
21S
METf
lL F
flCTOR
(flPP.)
MET
flL F
flCTO
R ER
PP.)
N -
N -
2
N -
3
N -
N -
5
NR7.1
0.8
5.2
6.8
6.4
0.5
NR3.2
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
3MS
33S
323
. 31
S30S
293
—t—
283
275
-
263
243
23S
223
213
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
J IN
7.
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(R
PP.)
IN X
N -
N -
2
N -
3
N -
N -
5
NR2.
72.
62.
12.
U2.
2
2.1
2.6
2.2
2.9
2.6
1.7
1.7
2.2
2.5
1.8
1.7
1.9
1.2
1.3
1.8
1.7
1,5
NR1.
21.
1
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
DWG,
N
O.-
I.R
.-
5461-2
8
NENCGNEX CRNRDIRN
EXPLGRRTION
LTD.
CRNf
lDO
RE
OP
TIO
N,
TELE
PHO
NE
LflK
E
"STU
RG
EON
Lf
lKE
flR
Efl
PnT
RIC
Ifl
M.D
., O
NTR
RIO
LIN
E
NO
.-
IQO
kl
ELEC
TROD
E CO
NFIG
URflT
ION
-*-X
-x—
——
NX
——
*-*-
X-*
PLO
TTIN
G
x ,
POIN
T —
*-X
X ^
100'
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF f
lNOM
flLQU
S ZO
NES
PROB
ABLE
III
IIMIII
IIIII
POSS
IBLE
x
xx x
x
MAY
l ?
197?
X-
?: V
^-jg
-si
?
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S!
Q.3
1-5
.O
HZ
NOTE
: CO
NTOU
RS
flT
LOG
flRIT
HMIC
IN
TERV
flLS
l,-1
.5-2
,-3
.-S
.-7
.5-1
0
DflT
E SU
RVEY
E
flPPR
OVED
,
DflT
Es
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SIN
DUCE
D PO
LflR
IZflT
ION
flN
D R
ES
ISTI
VIT
Y S
URVE
Y
NOTE
i TH
IS P
LOT
HflS
PRO
DUCE
D WI
TH P
N IB
M 36
0/65
COM
PUTE
R flN
O R
CHL
COHP
PLO
TTER
N -
5
N -
N -
3
N -
2
N -
2330
NR11
700
NR
1473
0NR
1390
0NR
3710
NR"4
970
NR10
600
1040
0NR
2140
0NR
1840
5770
NRNR
7500
1170
892\\
3120
8600
2020
1670
9750
\
\ f-
2100
16U
O\\
\\ l
1*
4*40
0 \
3830
1490
0
33*4
0 33
30
2990
0
3400
2600
018
70
6860
S
49
00
y 119
00
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
J IN
OHM
FEE
T /
2*R
ES
IST
IVIT
Y
(flP
PJ
IN
OHM
FEET
/
2*
52S
SOS
483
M46
S44
37
IIIIIII1
1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIX
X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
423
—l—
.403
—i—
38S
36S
—i—
32S
. .3
0328
5 —
i—26
5 , .
. 24S
,.
22
5.
'. 20
5 —
——
i—. 1
85
\ 16
314
512
3 —
l—l O
SBS
65 -L2S -J—
2N4N
6N
MET
flL F
flCTG
R tfl
PP
J
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
4.5
U.4
0.2
1.3
0.3
0.5
1.7
0.9
0.3
0.5
; 0.
9
0.4
0.1
1,6
0.9
1.0
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.5
MET
flL F
flCTO
R
(flP
P.)
0.7
0.3
0.4
2.2
NRNR
O.B
NR0.
3NR
NRNR
0.4
NR0.
2NR
0.3
0.1
NR1.
4NR
0.3
NRNR
NR0.
2
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
. 52
SSO
S—
l—48
3H6
S iW
S42
340
S38
S36
S3*
43—
i—32
330
328
S26
S24
S22
S—
i—20
318
316
3I4
S12
SID
S8S
65US
2S2N
4N
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FEC
T Ifl
PP
.)
IN
X.FR
EQUE
NCY
EFFE
CT
tflP
P.)
IN
X.
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N ~
4
N -
5
4.S
5.9
3.0
3.0
5.2
14.4
3.0
2.7
2.6
5.1
3.0
3.6
3.7
2.6
0.9
3.7
2.2
2.1
1.1
2.6
2.2
2.0
2.2
0.8
3.9
3.4
2.4
2.0
2.9
2.3
2.1*
3.0
3.8
1.9
1.2
2.7
2.4
2.6
2.6
1.8
1.7
8.5
1.6
2.6
2.3
2.1
5.2
3.2
4.0
4.8
NRNR
NR2
.02.
4NR
2.8
NR2.
82
.5NR
1.6
NRNR
NR1.
5
N -
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
DWG.
N
O.-
I.P
.-
5461-
29
NENCGNEX CflNRDIRN
EXPLORflTION LTD.
CflN
ROG
RE
OPT
ION
, TE
LEPH
ONE
Lf
lKE
- ST
URG
EON
LflK
E
flRE
fl
PR
TR
ICIfl
M
. D..
ON
TflR
IO
LIN
E
NO.
ELEC
TROD
E CO
NFIG
URflT
ION
*-X
-**—
—N
X—
—**
-X-*
PLOT
TING
PO
INT
— *-
X =
200'
SURF
flCE
PROJECTION
OF f
lNOM
flLO
US Z
ONES
DEF
INIT
E —
^^—
PROB
flBLE
m
inim
umPO
SSIB
LE
s s
s s
s
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S:
Q.3
1-5
.Q
HZ
NO
TE:
CONT
OUR
S RT
LQ
GflR
ITH
MIC
IN
TER
VflL
S
1.-
1.5
-2.-
3,-
5.-
7.5
-10
DflT
E:
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SINDU
CED
POLRRIZflTION
RND
RESISTIVITY
SURVEY
NOTE
i TH
IS P
LOT
MflS
PflO
OUCE
D W
ITH
PN
IBM
360
/65
COMP
UTER
RND
fi C
flLCO
MP P
LOTT
ER
N -
5
N -
14
N -
3
N -
2
N -
NRNR
3552
NR
NR8U
5
418
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
tfl
PP
J IN
OHM
FE
ET /
2n
718
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
RESISTIVITY
(flPP.)
IN O
HM F
EET
/ 2n
55S
543
533
523
515
SOS
495
48S
475
463
45S
443
433
423
s x
- x x x x x
-iii
iniii
iiiiii
iiiti
iiii
iiii
nii
iiii
i
MET
flL F
HCTO
R (fl
PP.)
MET
flL F
flCTO
ft (fl
PP
.)
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
3.6
5.8
1.6
2.8
14.1
NR
NRNR
0.5
NR5.
25.
3NF
t1,
0
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
5SS
SMS
- 53
351
3SO
SU9
S48
SIIT
SI46
SH5
SI41
4S*4
2S
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP.)
IN 7
.FR
EQUE
NCY
EFFE
CT
(flP
P.)
IN 7
,
N -
DWG.
N
O.-
I.
P.-
5461-3
0
NENCONEX CRNRDIRN
EXPLORRTION
LTD.
CflN
flOO
RE
OPT
ION
. TE
LEPH
ONE
Lf
lKE
STUR
GEO
N Lf
lKE
flRE
fl
PR
TR
ICIfl
M
. D.,
O
NTf
lRIO
LIN
E
NO. T
:
ELEC
TROD
E CO
NF I G
URflT
I ON
ANX
\ s
PLOT
TING
Nx
s'
POIN
T —
>X
X
= 10
0'
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF f
lNOM
flLOU
S ZO
NES
PRO
BflB
LE
IIIIII
HIII
IIII
POSS
IBLE
s""
MAY
I 2
1972
FREO
UENC
IESt
0.3
1-5
.0 H
Z
NOTE
: CO
NTOU
RS'
flT
LOG
flRIT
HMIC
IN
TER
VflL
S 1
.-l,5
-2.-
3.-
5.-
7.5
-10
DflT
E SU
RVEY
ED:
MftR
19
71
flPPR
OVE
D:
DflT
Et
McPHRR GEOPHYSICS
INDU
CED
POLf
lRIZ
flTIO
N f
lND
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
SUR
VEY
NOTE
i TH
IS P
LOT
MRS
PROD
UCED
WIT
H RN
IBM
360
/65
CGHP
UTEf
l AN
D R
CflLC
OMP
PLOT
TER
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(f
lPP
.)
IN
OHM
FEET
7
2*
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
.)
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
FREQUENCY
EFFE
CT (R
PPJ
IN X
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
tft
PP.J
IN
OHM
FEE
T /
2*
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
J
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
.) IN
X
N -
i
N -
2
N -
3
N -
U
N -
5
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
7900
NR
16500
NR
2800
Nfl
12000
NR
5980
MR
4470
NR
3460
NR
1890
018
10NR
43
50
NR
3980
NR
d5
20
NR
?200
9800
NR
\ f
1340
0
1460
0 \
X 5U10
1830
0 \
10800
11500
1130
0
4730
15
00
1740
2090
1650 \
f l
5800
.
9520
\
f 1000
2190
23
401900
1510 \\\ l
f
11500
N X
5600
5400
N -
5
N -
N -
3
N -
2
N -
505
485
'465
44
5 42
5 40
5 .
383
365
345
. 32
3 305
285
. 265
- 24
S .
. 225
205
-185
165
145
125
105
85
65
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(f
lPP
.)
IN
OHM
FEET
/
2N6N
S S
f S
.
r s f
s f
s s
^ii
iiii
iiii
iiii
nir
s s
s s
s s
sS S
f S
S
MET
RL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
.)
o.i
\"0
.6N
0.5
0.7
NR
0.9
U
.3
0.5
1.6
, 1.
30.5
0
.3
1,0
0.4
NR0
.3
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.5
NR
0.1
0.2
2.5
, ^
1.4
. 1.
7 ,
1.2
1.3
1.3
2.1
0.6
0.5
0,5
NR
0.8
NR
0.1
K8
\
t.:
L
0,9
NR1.
2
1.9
3.6
f f
, ,
0.8
0.4
1.9
0.3
0.8
0.7
NR1.
3NR
0.
4
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
505-483
463
443
-42
3 40
3 .
- 38
3 36
3 .
343
. 32
3 .
303
28S
26S
2*IS
.
22S
203
183
165
143
123
103
8363
FREQUENCY
EFFECT
(f
lPP.J
IN X
1.6
^ ,
, ,
7.5
\e.
z5.
6 ,
U.3
1.8
6.11
8.0
7.9
i 6.
0 6.
5 S
.!
6.0
0.9
NR
0.9
NR
0.8
2.7
2.8
3.3
2.3
1-0
, v
2.7
3.0
3.6
2.1
. H
.O
4.2
3.3
, 2
.8
"i. l
4,4
v
2.Y
2.0
\
3.0
3.8
\ {
l
2.5
NR2.
81.
6NR
2.1
2.9
3.5
3.8
3.0
3.2
3.3
3.2
3.3
3.1
N -
N -
2
N -
3
N -
N -
5
UWG.
N
O.-
I.R
.- 5461-3
NENCONEX CflN
flDIflN
EXPLORflTION LTD.
CRNROQRE OPTION
. TELEPHONE
LRKE
STURGEON Lf
lKE
RRER
PRTRICIR M.
D.,
ON
TRRIO
LINE NO.-
108H
ELEC
TRO
DE
CO
NFI
GU
RAT
ION
•*
-X-*
* ——
— NX
——
— *H
*-X
-*
\ x
PLOT
TING
\
/XPO
INT
——*X
K
^ 20
0'
SURF
flCE
PROJECTION
^^,
yOF
flN
OM
flLO
US
ZONE
S ''^^ fi
sofo
gisl,
PRO
BflB
LE
IIIIII
IIMIM
H
PO
SS
IBLE
x
x xx x
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S:
Q.3
1-5.
Q
HZ
NO
TE:
CONT
OUR
S flT
LO
GH
RIT
HM
IC
INTE
RVA
LS
l,-i.5
-2.-
3.-
5.-
7.5
-10
DflT
E SU
RVEY
ED
flPPR
OVE
Dt
DflT
E:
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SIN
DUCED
POLRRIZRTION flND RESIST
IVIT
Y SURVEY
NOTE
. TH
IS P
LOT
MBS
PROD
UCED
WIT
H flN
IB
M 3
60/6
5 CO
MPUT
ER R
NO 9
CflL
COM
F PL
OTTE
R
NR
815
0 NR
10
600
NR
- 11
800
NR
1200
0 NR
89
10
NR
1130
0 NR
19
10
NR
7400
NR
23
10
NR
8500
NR5000
NR
8200
NR
NR
1360
0
\8610
X
11600
12300
7100
8400
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
543
525
505
485
465
445
425
—l—
405
385
365
345
325
305
283
265
—i—
245
225
205
18S
—i—
—16
5 —
i—14
S —
i—12
5—
l—ID
S 85
6S
4S
23
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP.)
IN O
HM F
EET
7 2n
O 2N
4N
6N
f S
f S
f S
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
J
0.4
0.5
0,5
0,4
1.2
0.5
0,5
0.3
0.9
NR0.
3 0.
3o.
y2.
2 2,
5 .
v ^
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.1
0.2
0.2
NR
0.9
NR
0.8
NR
0.7
NR
0.4
NR
0.1
NR0.
3
1.2
, 0.
4 0.
8 0.
4
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.5
NR
0.4
NR
0.4
O.U
0.9
0.3
NR
NR0.
5NR
NR
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
543-
52
3 50
S 48
346
344
3 42
S40
3.
—t—
383
36S
3U3
323
303
283
26S
243
223
203
183
—L
—16
S 14
312
S10
S 83
BS2N
6N
FREQ
LENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP.)
IN X
3.8
, 5.
5 6.
1 6.
5
\6.
25.
6 5.
0 .
4.6
4.6
4.8
NR7.
7 \
l 4
.7
l 7.
3 5.
H
1.2
4.8
NR7.
7NR
8.
5 NR
7
.0NR
5.1
5.0
1.
3
NR
0.6
, .
. 2.
2
0.7
3.1
2.4
1.6
v 2.
6 2.
1 2.
5 2.
4 3.
0
1.8
1.3
1,8
\ 2.
3
1.8
, 2.
64.
1 ,
. .
1.9
1.0
2.2
2.4
2.2
2.0
2.5
2.3
4.3
f
2.0
1.0
3.2.
NR1.
4NR
2.
6NR
1,9
NR3.
3NR
1,9
NR3
.9w
m
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
760
1700
16
90
860
1250
677
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(f
lPP
J IN
OH
M FE
ET /
2tr
NR
388
1010
1240
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
RESI
STIV
ITY
(flP
P.)
IN O
HM F
EET
/ 2*
23S
22S
213
203
19S
18S
17S
163
155
143
—t—
135
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
JM
ETflL
FR
CTO
R (f
lPP
.)
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
NR3.1
. 2.9
. 3.4
^ 5.2
2.6
, 1,
5
1.6
0.9
0.6
0.5
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
S
233
223
2IS
20S
J93
. IBS
173
163
153
I4S
13S
FREQUENCY
EFFE
CT
IflP
P.)
IN X
.FREQUENCY
EFFECT
(flPP.)
IN X
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
1.2
v 1.
51.9
1.9
0.8
0.6
0.9
52G15SW0026
52G15SWa037
BELL LAKE
320
N -
N -
2
N -
3
N -
14
N -
5
DWG.
NO.-
I.
R.- 5461-52
NEWCONEX CflNflDIflN
EXPLORflTION LTD.
CRNR
DORE
OP
TION
, TE
LEPH
ONE
LRKE
STUR
GEON
LRK
E RR
ER
PRTR
ICIR
M.D., ON
TflR
IO
LINE
NO
.-
112H
ELECTRODE
CONFIG
URfl
TION
^-X-x——NX——x-X-*
PLOT
TING
\
POIN
T —
*X
* 20
0'
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF f
lNOM
ffi.OU
S ZO
NES
PRO
BflS
LE
min
imu
m
PO
SS
IBLE
x
xxx
x
MAY
l P
1972
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S*
Q.3
1-5
.Q
HZ
NO
TE:
CONT
OUR
S flT
LO
GflR
ITH
MIC
IN
TER
VflL
S
DflT
E SU
RVEY
ED:
MflR
19
71
flPPR
OVE
D:
DflT
Et
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SIN
DUCE
D POLRRIZRTIGN f
lND RESI
STIVIT
Y SU
RVEY
NOTE
i TH
IS P
LOT
HRS
PROD
UCED
HIT
H PH
IB
M 36
0/65
COM
PUTE
R flN
D fl C
flLCO
MP P
LOTT
ER
DWG.
NO
.- I.
P.-
54
61-
33
NENCONEX CflNflDIflN
EXPLGRflTION LTD.
CRNRDORE OPTION.
TELEPHONE
LflK
E
STURGEON LRKE RR
ER
PRTRICIR M.D.,
ONTRRIO
LIN
E
NO
.-
112H
--
ELEC
TROD
E CO
NFIG
URflT
ION
\
X
PLO
TTIN
G \
s'
POIN
T —
*X
X =
100
1
SURFflCE P
ROJECTION
OF f
lNOMfl
LOUS Z
ONES
PRO
BflB
LE
mim
nim
ii P
OS
SIB
LE
xxxxx
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S:
0.3
1-5
.0
HZ
NOTE
: CO
NTOU
RS
flT
LOG
flRIT
HMIC
IN
TER
VflL
S 1.-
i.5-2
.-3.-
5.-
7.5
-10
DflT
E SU
RVEY
ED:
MflR
19
71
flPPR
OVE
D:
DflT
E:
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SIN
DUCE
D POLRRIZRTION R
ND R
ESIS
TIVI
TY SU
RVEY
THIS P
LOT
MflS PRO
DUCE
D HI
TH flN
IBM 360/65 C
OMPUTER
flND H
CflLCOMP
PLOT
TER
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
15100
NR16000
NR8150
11SO
ONR
1100
0
1300
0 X
80
30
9250
X
59
10
\7210
X
8100
5010
6640
15580
1700
0 15
800
1586
0
NR9440
7960
NR17
500
NR2560
NR
9950
NR3780
NR12250
NR5250
NR13
UOO
NR2240
12800
10UO
O 10
100
6700
, 3700
5100
6400
5200
\
f 2340
NR6600
5300
3800
1200
0 X*
7820
3200
3660
3600
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
DWG.
NO
.- I.P.-.
.5461-
34
RESISTIVITY
(RPP.) IN O
HM F
EET
/ 2i
r
S6S
54S
523
SOS
. 48
S .
46S
44S
42S
- 40S
. 383
363
34S
32S
30S
28S
, 26S
24S
22S
20S
I8S
16S
14S
123
l OS
8363
4Ss s s s s s s
2S
-j—
RESISTIVITY
tflP
P.)
IN OH
M FEET X
2n
O 2N
UN
6N
NEWC
ONEX CR
NRDI
RN
EXPLGRRTION
LTD.
CRNR
DORE
O
PTIO
N.
TELE
PHON
E LR
KEST
URG
EON
LRKE
R
REf
l
PR
TRIC
IR
M.O
., O
NTR
RIO
LIN
E
NO
.-
S f S
S
S
X X S S S S
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
JM
ETflL
FflC
TQR
(flP
P.)
ELEC
TROD
E CO
NFIG
URflT
ION
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
0.3
.0.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
1.0
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.2
0.2
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
O.U
NR0.
40.
20.
80.
61.
3
0,5
NR0.
50
.70.
90.
70.
30.
40.
50.
10.
50.
20,
31.
50.
50.
40.
4NR
0.8
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.3
NEC
0.2
0.1
0.3
O.S
0.3
NR0.
5NR
0.8
NR0.
5NR
0.6
NR0.
4NR
0.2
NR1.
6NR
0.2
NR0.
7NR
0.2
NR0.
4NR
0.2
NR0.
7
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
56S
5US
523
SOS
48S
46S
4US
42S
383
36S
3US
323
303
263
245
223
. 20
3183
ies
123
—i—
103
6365
232N
6N
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
Ifl
PP
.) IN
7.
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
J IN
7.
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
li
N -
5
.4.2
8.0
5.5
i*.3
3.5
5.2
NR5.
06.
3
3,8
7.8
6.1*
6.7
. 5.
5
8.6
S. H
s.6.
98.
1
5.6
6.6
5.8
1.9
2.3
3.0
3.0
3.8
2.0
1,6
3.3
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.1
0.2
2.2
2.7
2.3
3.3
14.1
3.3
1.6
NR2,
8Nf
t2.
71.
51.
7l.S
0.9
8.3
5.2
3,0
NR2.
8U
.INR
l.B2.
73
.0NR
2.1
MR
-C.I
2.3
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
-*X
X
*
200'
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF f
lNOM
flLOU
S ZO
NES
PROB
RBLE
n
iiiiii
Mi"
" PO
SSIB
LE
x xx
xx
\v i
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S:
0,3
1-5
.0
NO
TE:
CONT
OUR
S RT
LO
GflR
ITH
MIC
IN
TER
VflL
S
1.-
l,5
-2.-
3.-
5.-
7.5
-10
DflT
E SU
RVE
YED
; .tl
flflE
U9Z
l
OflT
E:
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
SINDU
CED
PCLRRIZflTION
RND
RESI
STIV
ITY
SURVEY
NOTE
, TH
IS P
UJT
NflS
PRO
DUCE
D W
ITH
M
IW
360/
65
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
NR16
00
^ .
3976
NR64
83
2100
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
J IN
OHM
FEE
T X
2*
3620
3700
1390
/30
10
X
2200
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
.) IN
OHM
FEE
T X
2*
8S t—73
6SS3
33f S S S S
S
2S j—IS
2N
3N
-i_
__
__
__
_t
5N .j
FflC
TOR
(flP
PJ
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
.)
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
0.6
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.8
0.5
0.3
O.U
0.1
0.6
0.2
O.I
0.3
0.1
O.S
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.2
NR0.
10.
2NR
0.3
0.3
NR0.
20.
1
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
6373
.
6353
US
-33
.
23IS
,IN
2N3N
SN -i
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP.)
IN 7
.FR
EQUE
NCY
EFFE
CT
fflP
PJ
IN X
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
U
N -
S
0.9
1.2
0.3
0.5
O.V
0.8
0.2
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.3
0.1
0.9
NR2.
4NR
0.6
0.8
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
DWG.
N
O.-
I. P
. -54
61-3
5
NEWC
GNEX
CR
NRDI
RN
EXPLGRRTION
LTD.
CRNR
DORE
OP
TION
, TELEPHONE
LRKE
STUR
GEON
LRKE
RREfl
PRTR
ICIf
l M.D..
ONTR
RIO
LIN
E
NO
.- 11
6H
ELEC
TROD
E CO
NFIG
URflT
ION
*-* —
— NX
——
*x-X
-*
FT
PT
PLO
TTIN
G
s x
POIN
T —
*X
X =
100' /^ ' i . i
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
^
OF R
NOM
flLOU
S ZO
NES \
PROB
RBLE
iii
iiiiii
iiiu
i PO
SSIB
LE
x x
x x
x
MAY
l 21
37
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S*
0.3
1-5
.0
HZ
NO
TE:
CONT
OUR
S flT
LO
GR
RIT
HM
IC
INTE
RV
flLS
1
.-1
.5-2
.-3
.-5
.-7
.5-1
0
DflT
E SU
RVEY
ED i
MflR
19
71
flPPR
GVE
Dt
DflT
E:
McPHflR
GEOP
HYSI
CSINDUCED
PQLRRIZflTION
RND
RESISTIVITY
SURVEY
NUTE
i TH
IS P
LOT
MRS
PROD
UCED
HIT
H A
N I8
H 3
60/6
5 CO
MPUT
ER f
lND
H Cf
lLCO
HP P
LOTT
ER
DWG.
N
O.-
I.R
.-
5461-3
6
NEWC
ONEX
CRNflDIRN
EXPLORRTIO
LTD.
CflN
flDO
RE
OPT
ION,
TE
LEPH
ONE
LflK
E
STUR
GEO
N Lf
lKE
flR
Efl
PR
TR
ICIfl
M
.D.,
ON
TflR
IO
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
Cf
lPP.
J IN
OHM
FEE
T X
2*
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
.) IN
OHM
FEE
T , ^
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
J
MET
flL
FflC
TGR
(flP
PJ
ELEC
TRO
DE C
ONF
IGUR
ATIO
N
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF f
lNOM
ftLOU
S ZO
NES
DE
FIN
ITE
PR
OBf
lBLE
PO
SSIB
LE
xx
FREQ
UENC
IES,
p
.31
-fi.Q
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
.) IN
7.
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
J [N
yNO
TE:
CONT
OURS
flT
LO
GflR
ITHM
IC
INTE
RVf
lLS
1--
1.5
-2.-
3.-
S.-
7.5
-10
McP
HflR
G
EOPH
YSIC
S-0
03—
'——
—^—
——
——
——
——
——
—2S
K1—
—IN
DUCE
D P
OLf
lRIZ
flTIO
N f
lND
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
SU
RVEY
H R
'
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
14700
NR
14700
NR
3996
NR9070
NR
9150
MR1210U
14433
10727
^ 8950 X
13700
10584 A X
5880
v 7530
( 1452.7
. ^
7550
S
6500
12000
/
8400 S
6970
6750
5550
71
3059
70
7250
8210
10058
2070
0 .
13900
. 79
68
. 11
600
13SOO
8601
.
1043
*4
1085
0
82SO
8550
1470
0 11022 N
8720
8320
4500
46
00
N -
5
N -
N -
3
N -
2
N -
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
(fl
PP
J IN
OHM
FEE
T /
2*
60S
58S
56S
54S
52S
SOS
H8S
H6S
423
UOS
383
36S
343
32S
303
283
26S
243
. ,-
22S
—i—————————i————————i—————————i————————-J—
203
. 18S
165
——
L——
14S
123
—t—
l OS
8S
6S
RESISTIVITY
tflP
P.)
IN O
HM FEET
X
2*
43
23
O 2N
s s s s f f
s r s s * s
MET
flL F
RCTQ
F)
(flP
PJ
MET
fiL
FflC
TOR
Ifl
PP
.)
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
NEC
0.5
v 1.
1 ,
0.5
0.4
0.8
1.4
1.1
, 0.
1 v
1.1
1-1
0.9
0.8
, 0,
2 0.
5 0.
2 v
1.0
. 0.
60.
3 0.
5 0.
1 0.
2 0.
3 O
.U
0.3
0.6
0.8
*
1.1
0,3
0.3
0.3
O.il
0.
1 0.
6
0.3
NEC
NEC
NR
0.9
0.5
0.6
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.8
O.U
0.
i 0.
2 0.
3 NE
C O
.i0.
20.
2 O
.H
0.3
NEC
0.9
0.9
0.7
MR
0.7
NRNR
0.2
NR1.
3 \
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.6
0,1
0,3
0.9
0.3
0.4
NEC
NEC
NEC
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
60S
58S
, 56
S S4
S , 5
2S
.503
-483
46
S .4
43
42S
40S
38S
36S
345
325
30S
28S
26S
24S
. 22
S 20S
. .
IBS
16S
14S
123
8363
4S
2S
O
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP
J IN
7.
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FEC
T ER
PPJ
IN
X
N -
N -
2
N -
3
N -
N -
5
-0,1
3.6
7.0
6.9
7.6
7.S
,
6.3
v 8.
37.
8U
.3
4.0
6.6
NEC
6.9
7.0
3.9
li. 8
NR
NE
C MB
6.3
.6
MR
6.6
5.9
1.9
2.5
v ,
1.1
^,
f 2.5
.
^
1.7
1.8
' ,
. 3.
S3.
2
1.9
NR2.
0
2.8
3.1
m
4.0
3.4
v
5.0
1.7
\
f 8
.1
3.9
.8
NEC
MEG
-1.0
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
6220
v
^ 10
620
^ 91
00
, f
1833
0 ,
, ,
5850
52
00
. 79
52
^ 11
043
, f
. f
2900
,
. 54
00
. 96
00
, 14
809
^ 96
86
t ,
1960
0 16
854
v ^
v 57
00
. ^
v 19
960
y 14
000
1416
0
6600
4780
2292
3
5180
5210
\ f S
1520
0 A
f /
1
2930
2640
27
60
1385
7
1100
0 10
575
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
RESI
STIV
ITY
(flP
P.)
IN O
HM F
EET
X 2*
483
463
443
423
403
383
RES
ISTI
VITY
Ifl
PP
.) IN
OHM
FEE
T /
2n
f S
S
S
S
S
363
—i—
343
32S
303
283
263
-243
.223
.203
18S
163
143
12S
l OS
83
63
43
23s s
* s
s s
s
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP.)
MET
RL F
RCTO
R Cf
lPP.
)
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
1.4
0.1
0.5
O.B
0.4
0.5
0,7
0.8
v 1.
1 ,
0.9
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
, 0.
6 0.
2 0.
9 0.
2 0.
3 0.
6
0.6
0.9
0.2
NEC
0.6
0.4
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.8
0.2
0.6
NEC
0.6
0,7
NEC
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.3
NEC
0.8
0.4
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
483
4.6S
44S
423
103
.383
363
343
323
303
283
.263
243
.225
-203
,18S
163
1US
123
103
8363
43
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(fl
PP.)
IN 7
.FR
EQUE
NCY
EFFE
CT
(flP
PJ
IN 7
,
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
5.8
-S.I
5.5
2.2
. . v
0.7
0.9
^ ,
. 2.
0 v
3.1
, 2.
9 2.1
, 1.6
#0.
98.
4 .
fCG
2.U
2.8
2.4
2.3
^\
1.6
1.8
^ 2.
3 2.
9 2.
9 2.
0 2.
9 i
3.S
3.
0
3.1
3.2
, 2.
0
2.2
2.7
2.9
2.3
2.7
2.7
2.9
2.0
S. 8
6.0
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
DWG.
N
O.-
I.P
.- 5
461-3
8
NEWCON
EX CRNRDIflN
EXPLORflTION LTD.
CflN
flOQR
E O
PTIO
N,
TELE
PHO
NE L
flKE
STUR
GEON
LR
KE f
lREf
l
PflT
RIC
Ifl M
,D.,
ONT
RRIO
LIN
E
NO
.-
128W
ELECTRODE
CONF
IGUR
fiTI
ON
*-X-*~*——NX——**-X-*
PLOT
TING
xx
POIN
T —*X X
= 20
0'
SURF
flCE
PROJECTION
OF R
NOMflLOUS
HONES
DEF
INIT
E —
—~—
—PR
QBRB
LE
iiiiii
iiiiii
ui
PO
SS
IBLE
s
ss
ss
MAY
I ?
197!
FREQ
UENC
IES*
Q.31
-5.0
HZ
NOTE:
CONTOURS
RT
LOGftRITHMIC
INTERV
RLS
1.-1.5-2
,-3.
-5.-
7,5-
10
OflTE
SURV
EYED
! HftR 1971
DRTE:
McPH
RR GE
OPHYSI
CSIN
DUCE
D PO
LflR
IZfl
TIGN
flN
D RE
SIST
IVIT
Y SU
RVEY
NOTE
i TH
IS P
LOT
HRS
PftO
OUCE
D W
ITH
flN
IBM
360/
65 C
OMPU
TER
flND
fl Cf
lLCO
HP P
LOTT
ER
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
13828 ^
, 2700
0
1150
0 k
v 5700
. ,
2320
v v
v ^
11050
1270
0
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
tfl
PP
,) IN
OHM
FEE
T /
2*
5850
\ X
11
400 //S
47
SO
N
2780
NR
1792
0
1517
0
14145
. 14
35
40S
. 38
3 36
S 343
32S
., 30
3 .
28S
263
. 24
S 22S.
203.
183
16S
143
12S
103
83s
s f
s s
s s
X-I
IIII
IIII
IIM
IIII
I
RESISTIVITY
(RPPJ
IN O
HM FEE
T t
2n
6S
43
23
O-l—
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
—l-_
____
____
____
__L_
____
____
____
___l
N -
5
N -
4
N -
3
N -
2
N -
l
MET
flL F
flCTO
R (fl
PP
JM
ETflL
FRC
TOR
(flP
PJ
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.8
NEC
0.4
O.S
0.
3
NEC
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.6
0.9
0.3
NEC
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
US
NE
C 0.
3 0.
2 0.
3 NE
C 0.
2 0.
1 0.
6 0.
3 0.
2 0,
4
0.5
0.3
NR
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
443
. ,
423
. 40
3 38
336
5.j—
343
323
—i—
305
28S
265
243
223
20S
IBS
165
143
125
103
—t—
83
63
43
23
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
(R
PP.)
IN X
FREQ
UENC
Y EF
FECT
tfl
PP
.) IN
X
N -
N -
2
N -
3
2.0
,,
4.1
.
2.9
2.1
4.03.
5
4.0
H.O
3.6
3.6
3.3
2.3
v 1.
83.
8S.
3
2.2
NE
C
52G158W0026
52G15SW0037
BELL LAKE
340
SI 6
//.T.S
W -OO 31
,7.
1
N -
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
DWG.
NO
.- I.P.
- 5461-39
NEWCON
EX CR
NRDI
RN
EXPL
ORRT
ION
LTD.
CRNRDGRE OPTION,
TELEPHONE
LflK
E
STUR
GEON Lf
lKE RR
ER
PRTRICIfl
M.D.
, ONTRRIO
LINE NO.-
132W
ELECTR
ODE
CONFIGURRTION
•*-X-**———NX——**-X-*
PLO
TTIN
G \
,PO
INT
—*-
X
X =
200'
SURF
flCE
PRO
JECT
ION
OF R
NOMR
LOUS
ZON
ES
PROB
RBLE
III
IIIIII
IHIII
POSS
IBLE
s s ' ' s
FREQUENC
IES:
0.31
-5.0
HZ
NOTE*
CONTOU
RS
RT
LQGf
lRIT
HMIC
INTE
RVRL
S 1.-1.5-2
.-3.
-5.-
7.5-
10
DRTE SURVEYED:
MRR
1971
RPPROVED:
DRTE:
McP
HRR
GEO
PHYS
ICS
INDU
CED
PO
LflR
IZR
TIO
N
flND
R
ES
IST
IVIT
Y
SURV
EY
NOTE
i TH
IS P
LOT
HflS
PRO
DUCE
D W
ITH
flN
IBM
360
/65
COKP
UTER
RNO
H C
flLCO
MP P
LOTT
ER
N -
l
N -
2
N -
3
N -
4
N -
5
DWG,
N
O.-
I.P
.-
5461
-57
NEWCON
EX CRNRDIflN
EXPLORRTION
LTD.
CRNR
OORE
O
PTIO
N,
TELE
PHO
NE L
flKE
STUR
GEON
Lf
lKE
flREf
l
PflT
RIC
IR
M. D
., O
NTflR
IO
LIN
E
NO
.-
ELEC
TROD
E C
ON
FIG
UR
flTIO
N
PLO
TTIN
G
son
.,
PO
INT
—*X
X
=.
200
SURF
RCE
PROJECTION
OF RNOMfiLOUS ZONES
DEFINITE
PROBRBLE
POSSIBLE
FREQ
UEN
CIE
S:
Q.3
1-5
.0
HZL
NO
TE:
CONT
OUR
S RT
LO
GAR
ITH
MIC
IN
TER
VflL
S
1.-
1.5
-2.-
3.-
5.-
7.5
-10
DflT
E
SUR
VEYE
D:
JW
19
7L
RPP
RO
VED
:
DflT
E
McP
HRR
GEO
PHYS
ICS
INDU
CED
PO
LflR
IZflT
ION
flN
D
RE
SIS
TIV
ITY
SU
RVEY
NOTE,,
THIS P
LOT *S Pf
lOOUCE
D WITH f
W IBM
360/
6S
N - 4
N - 3
N - 2
N -
17000 f 13882
8400
6193
3140 . 23HO 12000 , , 6204
9024
4000
4350 4050
3540 3900
NR
9222
5000
3500
RESISTIVITY tflPP.) IN OHM FEET X 2*RESISTIVITY (flPPJ IN OHM FEET / 2n
N - 5
N - 14
N - 3
N - 2
N - l
^2S 41S. 403 39S. 38S- 37S 36S 35S 333 323 313 30S 29S 283 27S 263 255 243 23S 22S 213 203llllllllltllllllllx x x x- s s s s * s x s x x , linn III t f mmr x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
METflL FflCTOR (flPPJ METflL FflCTOR (flPP.)
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - H
N - 5
0.5 0.8 NEG 1.0
0.2 0.6 0.6
NEC
0.2 0.5
O.S 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.1
0.3 0.4 NR 1.1 \ 0.8
9.8 ^ S.8 1.4 , 1.5 , , 0.6 0.5 1.4 , 0 .7
,,\NEG 1.9 /X 0.4 NEG NEG 0.7 C i.o
0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 NEG
NR 0.5 0.6 NR NR 1.3 \ 0.4 0.3 0.4 NR
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - U
N - 5
423 413, 403 39S 38S. 37S 363 3SS, 343 333 321 313. 30S 293 283- 27S, 263 253 243 233 223 21S 203
FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPPJ IN X FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPPJ IN 7.
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - U
N - 5
2.8 , 3.1 v . v ^ -1.8 , , . . 3,4 . k , 1.2
2.1
3.8
2.5 , 3.7
2.2
S.I 2.7 3.2 , 2.3
NEC NEG 2.5 l ( 5.1
2.0 v 3.8 3.1* X 2.2 NEG
1.8 2.9 NR 3.2 \ 2.5
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - U
N - 5
DWG. NO.- I.P.- 5461 -40
NEWCGNEX CflNFIDIflN EXPLGRflTION LTD.CflNRDORE OPTION, TELEPHONE LflKE
STURGEON LRKE RRER
PRTRICIfl M.D., ONTflRIO
LINE NO.- 132H
ELECTRODE CONFIGURflTION -*-X-x——NX——**-X-*
V
\ X
PLOTTING \ POINT — * X = 100'
SURFflCE PROJECTION OF flNOMflLOUS ZONES
PROBflBLE M immmm POSSIBLE s ssss
FREOUENCIESi 0.31-5.0 HZ
NOTE: CONTOURS RT LOGflRITHMIC INTERVflLS 1.-1.5-2.-3.-5.-7.5-10
DflTE SURVEYEDt Mpfl 1971 1*^*1
flPPROVED: r '^^PH
DflTEi
McPHflR GEOPHYSICSINDUCED POLflRIZflTION flND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
nmr. THI^ PI ffi HRS PftOOUCEO MITH RN IBM 360/65 COMPUTER flND fl CflLCOMP 'PLOTTER
N - 5
N - 14
N - 3
N - 2
N -
NR
6600
12274 10620 NR 10200 10800
9702
11050
NR IS600 , 10058
6000 9750
12210
8560 9600
5680
5300
N - 5
N - 14
N - 3
N - 2
N -
RESISTIVITY tflPPJ IN OHM FEET / 2" RESISTIVITY (flPPJ IN OHM FEET /
323 30S 28S 26S , 245 . \ 22S . 20S . 18S 16S——L——
14S 12S l OS —l—
8S 63-O——
23X X X S X S f
METflL FflCTOR (flPPJ METftL FftCTOR (flPPJ
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
N - U
N - 5
0.7
0.3
0.1 0.3 0.4 1.3 NEG - 0.1 0.3 0.3 0,4 0.3 0.2 0.7
0.9 0.2 0.3 NEG 0.2 0.9 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.5
1.3 NEG 0.7 0.1 NEG 0.2 0.3 NEG 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.9
NR NR 0.1 0.7 NR 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 NR 0.3 0,5
N -
N -
N -
N -
N -
DWG. NO.- I.P.- 5461-41
NEWCGNEX CflNRDIRN EXPLORATION LTD.CflNflDORE OPTION, TELEPHONE LflKE
STURGEON LRKE flREfl PflTRICIP M.O., ONTflRIO
LINE NO.- 136H
ELECTRODE CONFIGURflTION *-X-**——NX——***
PLOTTING \ / 'POINT ——* X - 200* st&ti r-, r
343 323 , r. 303 283 26S 223 203 IBS 163 143 103 83 63-t—
43 23
FREQUENCY EFFECT (flPPJ IN 7. FREQUENCY EFFECT tflPPJ IN X
N - l
N - 2
N - 3
3.9 3.2
52G15SW3026 52G1SSW0037 BELL LAKE 350
3.0 3.1 . 2.7 , 3.5
3.6 f 2.2 l H.O X 2-8
4.0 S 6.S A V.V 4.1
NR 4.9 4.B
, SURFRCE PROJECTION OF flNOMflLOUS ZONES
PROBABLE m inimum POSSIBLE x ^xxx
FREQUENCIES: Q.3J-5.Q M7 OflTE SURVEYED: HflR 1971
NOTEt CONTOURS flT LOGRRITHMIC INTERVflLS 1.-1.5-2.-3.-5.-7.5-10
McPHRR GEOPHYSICSINDUCED POLflRIZflTION RND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
MOTE. THIS PLOT HRS PRODUCED WITH RN IBM 360/65 COMPUTE* WC fl Cd-CWr PLOTTER