modelling the spatial decisions of private developers: a case study of jakarta metropolitan area,...
TRANSCRIPT
A case study of Jakarta Metropolitan Area, Indonesia
Modelling the spatial decisions of private developers:
Agung Wahyudi, Yan Liu, Jonathan Corcoran
School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management (GPEM)The University of Queensland
AUSTRALIA
Agung Wahyudi S42817150
Why model the residential developer behaviour?
• Urban models aim to provide:• a better understanding of the mechanisms underpinning
urban system and;• Simulate the impact of a spatial policies on urban form
• There has been various urban models used to simulate urban growth and urban form.
• Models accounting for residential developers behaviour are largely missing from these models.• In particular, the representation of profit-driven
developers on searching for the most profitable areas, and the impact of this behaviour on land cover and land value.
Agung Wahyudi S42817150
The spatial context of this study
• Covers 6800 km2,
• Population: 28 million people (~10% of Indonesian). MEGAcity
• Jakarta (the capital of Indonesia) as the economic core.
Agung Wahyudi S42817150
Factors impacting developer decisions
• Developers consider • multi-dimension factors,
• various actors, as well as• details on the factor intrinsic to the site.
• In the model, we selected few factors to localize and to focus the impact of these factors on urban form.
• In the model, factors intrinsic to the site :
• Proximity of the targeted area from the city centre (CBD),• Proximity to the (toll) roads, and• Land value.
• Factors intrinsic to the developer : • Access to capital affects the decision (incl loan),
• Number of developers in the area.
Agung Wahyudi S42817150
Conceptual framework – potential profit hypothetical curve
• Blue line: Raw land price before installment of infrastructure varies according to the distance from city centre
• Red line: Road construction improves site accessibility
• Green line: Added value increase equally as much as 30-∼100% of cost
• Purple line: Selling price 30%
• Monocentric assumption still applicable in JMASource: adapted from Winarso 2000
Land
val
ue
Agung Wahyudi S42817150
Method #1: The modules in agent-based urban growth model
Urban-agent-based MODEL
Module A:Spatial
dimension
Module B:Agents’
behaviours
a. Static layer b. Dynamic layer
Physical factorsDeveloper’s behaviour
Module C:Interaction
• The model has three modules: 1. environment, 2. agent, and 3. interaction
• The environment module represents the properties owned by the land; land cover type, land price, distance to CBD, distance to road
• The agent represents properties exhibited by the developers; the capital, number of developers
Environment Agent
Agung Wahyudi S42817150
Method #2: The workflow
Cost analysis
Land prices?
Find suitable area
Assess the area
REJECTExclude from
re-visitingBeyond capital
Within the capital
Development feasible? NO
Develop
Update land price
Find cellMin {land price}
START
Update land cover
Secure capital
Developers
Road construction cost
Site clearing cost
Expected selling profit
YES
Development decision
Agung Wahyudi S42817150
Method #3: The model interface
• The interface offers views on land cover, land value, distance to CBD, or distance to road.
• Developers’ parameters: number of developers, the searching radius a, initial capital, and loan.
• Monitoring panels (on the right).
Agung Wahyudi S42817150
Results #1:Urban land cover growth
• The movement of the developers: toward the outer most of study area.
• The developers capture the potential economic opportunity on the outer most area.
t=0 t=0+n
Agung Wahyudi S42817150
Results #2: Land value changes
• Land value in newly developed areas increase ( 300%) as developers construct ∼the infrastructure in these sites.
• Increasing land values prevent other developers moving into these areas.
t=0 t=0+n
Agung Wahyudi S42817150
Tentative conclusions and future work
• The model offers insight into how new residential areas and land values across JMA is shaped by the developer behaviour.
• Deviation of the simulated urban pattern from the observed coverage suggests that the profit oriented (profit maximization) seems only one dimension of the decision to develop. • Marketing
• Land banking
• Limitations: 1. Simple initial set of variables,2. No temporal dimension.
• Future work: 1. A typology of developers,2. Incorporate notion of land banking, and3. Investigate inclusion of a temporal dimension.
THANK YOU
@agungwah
Questions? Comments? Follow my research on
Agung Wahyudi S42817150
FAQ
• Why the model have no sensitivity analysis?• What is the impact of other factors?