mike novotney, p.e. (md) center for watershed protection

48
Putting It All Together Integrated Natural Resource Protection, Stormwater Management and Site Design Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Upload: pandora-sims

Post on 31-Dec-2015

28 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Putting It All Together Integrated Natural Resource Protection, Stormwater Management and Site Design. Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection. Stormwater & Site Design Criteria. Runoff Reduction. WQV. Channel. Water Quality. Flood Control. Aquatic Resource Protection. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Putting It All Together Integrated Natural Resource Protection, Stormwater Management and Site Design

Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD)Center for Watershed Protection

Page 2: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Stormwater & Site Design Criteria

Flood

Control

Channel

WQV

Runoff Reduction

Flood Control

Aquatic Resource Protection

Water Quality

Page 3: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Meeting the Stormwater & Site Design Criteria Satisfying these criteria requires the successful

integration of natural resource protection and stormwater management with the site planning and design process

This integration can be accomplished by using an approach to the site planning and design process that:

(1) identifies and protects valuable natural resources(2) limits land disturbance and the creation of new impervious and disturbed pervious cover (3) reduces and manages post-construction stormwater runoff rates, volumes and pollutant loads

Page 4: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Natural Resource Protection & Stormwater Management Practices & Techniques This approach involves the use of two distinct, but

complementary groups of natural resource protection and stormwater management techniques:

Green Infrastructure Practices: – Natural resource protection and stormwater management

practices and techniques (e.g., better site planning and design techniques, low impact development practices) that can be used to help prevent increases in post-construction stormwater runoff rates, volumes and pollutant loads

– Used to protect natural resources from the direct impacts of the land development process, limit land disturbance and the creation of new impervious and disturbed pervious cover, and reduce post-construction stormwater runoff rates, volumes and pollutant loads

Stormwater Management Practices– Stormwater management practices (e.g., wet ponds,

swales) that can be used to manage post-construction stormwater runoff rates, volumes and pollutant loads.

Page 5: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

How do I best use these practices during the site planning and design process?

Need guidance for the developer, site designer and plan reviewer– Stick with the existing process– But make sure that we consider

natural resource protection and stormwater management from the very beginning of process

Page 6: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Six-step stormwater management planning and design process

Page 7: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Prior to Site Assessment Have a project

idea or find a site that leads to an idea

Develop knowledge of all applicable constraints and requirements

Make a basic “go or no go” decision

Goal is to understand the site constraints

and possibilities without investing too

much time and money

Page 8: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Prior to Site Layout

Complete site assessment & natural resources inventory

Develop site fingerprint

Identify primary and secondary conservation areas and buildable area

Goal is to ID important resources and reduce impacts of land development

“by design”

Page 9: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection
Page 10: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Step 4: Prepare Stormwater Management Concept Plan

Page 11: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Can complete iterative process using Coastal Georgia Site Planning & Design Worksheet…

Page 12: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection
Page 13: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection
Page 14: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection
Page 15: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Let’s walk through an example

Peachtree Strip Mall

Page 16: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Our site is pretty basic:

PEACHTREE STRIP MALL – CONVENTIONAL DESIGN

Basic Site Analysis

Farm Field

Natural Vegetation

Small Pond

Page 17: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Peachtree Strip MallConventional Design

Page 18: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

PEACHTREE STRIP MALL – CONVENTIONAL DESIGN

VL = (a . C) . P6

ParkingParking

ParkingParking

ShopsShops

ShopsShopsAnchorAnchor

RestaurantRestaurant

Sketch Plan

Page 19: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

ConcentratedConcentratedParking AreaParking AreaConcentratedConcentratedParking AreaParking Area

Disturbed Disturbed PerviousPervious

AreaArea

Disturbed Disturbed PerviousPervious

AreaArea

DetentionDetentionPondPond

DetentionDetentionPondPond

Drugstore Shops Supermarket

Shops

Restaurant

DisturbedDisturbedPerviousPervious

AreaArea

DisturbedDisturbedPerviousPervious

AreaArea

PEACHTREE STRIP MALL – CONVENTIONAL DESIGN

Concept Plan

0 100 200

Page 20: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Peachtree Strip Mall Conventional Design

HSG B Soils Area = 18 acres Impervious Cover = 15.2

acres I = 84% impervious RRv =

(0.05+ 0.009*84)*1.2÷12*18 = 1.46 ac-ft Assume Tc = 15 min.

P = 3.6 in ARPv = 2.65 ac-ft

Page 21: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

ConcentratedConcentratedParking AreaParking AreaConcentratedConcentratedParking AreaParking Area

Disturbed Disturbed PerviousPerviousAreaArea

Disturbed Disturbed PerviousPerviousAreaArea

DetentionDetentionPondPondDetentionDetentionPondPond

Drugstore Shops Supermarket

Shops

Restaurant

DisturbedDisturbedPerviousPervious

AreaArea

DisturbedDisturbedPerviousPervious

AreaArea

PEACHTREE STRIP MALL – CONVENTIONAL DESIGN

Concept Plan

0 100 200

We can probably do a better job protecting naturalresources and reducing stormwater runoff rates,volumes and pollutant loads…

Page 22: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Peachtree “Glen”Innovative Design Using Green Infrastructure Practices

Page 23: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection
Page 24: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Our site is pretty basic:

Basic Site Analysis

Farm Field

Natural Vegetation

Small Pond

Better Site Planning Technique:Preserve Secondary Conservation Areas

Page 25: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Better Site Design Technique: Reduce Parking Lot Footprint

Better Site Design Technique: Create Landscaping Islands in Parking Lot

Better Site Design Technique: Reduce Clearing and Grading Limits

Page 26: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Drugstore

Shops

SupermarketRestaurant

Shops

Shops

Sketch Plan

PEACHTREE GLEN – INNOVATIVE DESIGN

Page 27: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

PEACHTREE GLEN – INNOVATIVE DESIGN

Drugstore

Shops

SupermarketRestaurant

Shops

Shops

ReducedReducedClearing & Clearing &

GradingGrading

ReducedReducedClearing & Clearing &

GradingGrading

Parking Lot Parking Lot LandscapingLandscaping

IslandsIslands

Parking Lot Parking Lot LandscapingLandscaping

IslandsIslands

ReducedReducedParking LotParking Lot

FootprintFootprint

ReducedReducedParking LotParking Lot

FootprintFootprint

ConservationConservationAreasAreas

ConservationConservationAreasAreas

Concept Plan

0 100 200

Page 28: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection
Page 29: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Site Information

HSG B Soils Area = 18 acres Impervious Cover = 13.6 acres I = 76% impervious RRv == (0.009*76+0.05)*1.2÷12*18= 1.31 ac-ft Was 1.45 ac-ft

– 10% savings even before stormwater management “credits”

Next, apply “credits”…

Assume Tc = 15 min. P = 3.6 in ARPv = 2.35 ac-ft

– 12% savings

Page 30: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

PEACHTREE GLEN – BETTER SITE DESIGN

Drugstore

Shops

SupermarketRestaurant

Shops

Shops

3.9 A3.9 A

0 100 200

ConservationConservationAreaArea

ConservationConservationAreaArea

ConservationConservationAreaArea

ConservationConservationAreaArea

Same number of parking spaces but with slightly narrower widthsSame number of parking spaces but with slightly narrower widths

Page 31: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

After Better Site Planning/Design “Credits” RRv =

= (0.009*76+0.05)*1.2÷12*(18-3.9)

= 1.03 ac-ft Was 1.45 ac-ft, then 1.31 ac-ft

– 29% savings over conventional design with “credits”

Page 32: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection
Page 33: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Low Impact Development Practice Selection In general, the following information should be

considered when deciding what green infrastructure practices should be used on a development site:– Ability to Help Satisfy the Stormwater Management Criteria

(Table 7.1)– Overall Feasibility (Table 7.2)– Site Applicability (Table 7.3)

In addition, site planning and design teams should consider how the following site characteristics and constraints, which are commonly encountered in coastal Georgia, will influence the use of green infrastructure practices on a development site:– Poorly drained soils, such as hydrologic soil group C and D

soils– Well drained soils, such as hydrologic soil group A and B soils– Flat terrain– Shallow water table– Tidally-influenced drainage

Page 34: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Table 7.1: Ability to Help Satisfy the Stormwater Management Criteria Table 7.1: How Low Impact Development Practices Can Be Used to Help Satisfy the Stormwater Management Criteria

Low Impact Development Practice

Stormwater RunoffReduction

Water Quality Protection

Aquatic Resource Protection

Overbank Flood Protection

Extreme Flood Protection

Alternatives to Disturbed Pervious Surfaces

Soil Restoration

“Credit”:Subtract 50% of any restored areas from the total site area and re-calculate the runoff reduction volume (RRv) that applies to a development site.

“Credit”:Subtract 50% of any restored areas from the total site area and re-calculate the runoff reduction volume (RRv) that applies to a development site.

“Credit”:Assume that the post-development hydrologic conditions of any restored areas are equivalent to those of open space in good condition.

“Credit”:Assume that the post-development hydrologic conditions of any restored areas are equivalent to those of open space in good condition.

“Credit”:Assume that the post-development hydrologic conditions of any restored areas are equivalent to those of open space in good condition.

Site Reforestation/ Revegetation

“Credit”:Subtract 50% of any reforested revegetated areas from the total site area and re-calculate the runoff reduction volume (RRv) that applies to a development site.

“Credit”:Subtract 50% of any reforested/revegetated areas from the total site area and re-calculate the runoff reduction volume (RRv) that applies to a development site.

“Credit”:Assume that the post-development hydrologic conditions of any reforested/revegetated areas are equivalent to those of a similar cover type in fair condition.

“Credit”:Assume that the post-development hydrologic conditions of any reforested/revegetated areas are equivalent to those of a similar cover type in fair condition.

“Credit”:Assume that the post-development hydrologic conditions of any reforested/revegetated areas are equivalent to those of a similar cover type in fair condition.

Soil Restoration with Site Reforestation/ Revegetation

“Credit”:Subtract 100% of any restored and reforested/ revegetated areas from the total site area and re-calculate the runoff reduction volume (RRv) that applies to a development site.

“Credit”:Subtract 100% of any restored and reforested/ revegetated areas from the total site area and re-calculate the runoff reduction volume (RRv) that applies to a development site.

“Credit”:Assume that the post-development hydrologic conditions of any restored and reforested/ revegetated areas are equivalent to those of a similar cover type in good condition.

“Credit”:Assume that the post-development hydrologic conditions of any restored and reforested/ revegetated areas are equivalent to those of a similar cover type in good condition.

“Credit”:Assume that the post-development hydrologic conditions of any restored and reforested/ revegetated areas are equivalent to those of a similar cover type in good condition.

Page 35: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Table 7.2: Overall Feasibility

Table 7.2: Factors to Consider When Evaluating the Overall Feasibility of Green Infrastructure Practices

Green Infrastructure

PracticeDrainage Area Area Required Slope Minimum Head Minimum Depth

to Water Table Soils

Better Site Planning Techniques

Protect Primary Conservation Areas

N/A

10,000 SF minimum* to

receive stormwater management

“credits”

No restrictions N/A N/A No restrictions

Protect Secondary Conservation Areas

N/A

10,000 SF minimum* to

receive stormwater management

“credits”

Protect slopes >15% N/A N/A

No restrictions; protect erodible

soils

Better Site Design Techniques

Reduce Clearing and Grading Limits N/A No restrictions No restrictions N/A N/A No restrictions

Reduce Parking Lot Footprints N/A N/A No restrictions N/A N/A No restrictions

Low Impact Development Practices

Alternatives to Disturbed Pervious Surfaces

Soil Restoration N/A No restrictions 10% maximum N/A 1.5 FT C/D or disturbed soils

Site Reforestation/ Revegetation N/A

10,000 SF minimum* to

receive stormwater management

“credits”

No restrictions N/A N/A No restrictions

Page 36: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Table 7.3: Site Applicability

Table 7.3: Factors to Consider When Evaluating the Applicability of Green Infrastructure Practices on a Development Site

Green Infrastructure Practice Rural Use Suburban Use Urban Use Construction Cost Maintenance

Better Site Planning Techniques

Protect Primary Conservation Areas Low Low

Protect Secondary Conservation Areas Low Low

Better Site Design Techniques

Reduce Clearing and Grading Limits Low Low

Low Impact Development Practices

Alternatives to Disturbed Pervious Surfaces

Soil Restoration Medium Low

Site Reforestation/ Revegetation Medium Low

Alternatives to Impervious Surfaces

Green Roofs High High

Permeable Pavement High High

“Receiving” Low Impact Development Practices

Conservation Areas Low Low

Vegetated Filter Strips Low Low

Grass Channels Low Medium

Page 37: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Practice Selection:

We might have picked grass channels or dry swales for conveyance– But we protected the natural drainage

features as a secondary conservation area We might consider green roofs or

permeable pavement We might also think about rainwater

harvesting or stormwater planters Let’s start with bioretention areas and

sheetflow to conservation areas– Can use distributed landscaping areas to

“receive” stormwater runoff

Page 38: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

PEACHTREE GLEN – INNOVATIVE DESIGN

Drugstore

Shops

SupermarketRestaurant

Shops

Shops

ConservationConservationAreaArea

ConservationConservationAreaArea

ConservationConservationAreaArea

ConservationConservationAreaArea

BioretentionBioretentionAreaArea

BioretentionBioretentionAreaArea

BioretentionBioretentionAreasAreas

BioretentionBioretentionAreasAreas

Area 14.7 acArea 14.7 ac

Area 21.5 acArea 21.5 ac Area 3

3.8 acArea 33.8 ac

3.9 ac3.9 ac

0 100 200

Sheetflow toSheetflow toCons. AreaCons. Area

Sheetflow toSheetflow toCons. AreaCons. Area 1.8 ac1.8 ac

Sheetflow toSheetflow toCons. AreaCons. Area

Sheetflow toSheetflow toCons. AreaCons. Area

0.4 ac0.4 ac

Page 39: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Bioretention

Area 1

Areas 2 & 3

Page 40: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection
Page 41: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Apply Runoff Reduction “Credits”

Target RRv = 1.03 ac-ft Apply runoff reduction “credits”

for each of our low impact development practices– Site Planning & Design Worksheet

helps automate this process, so let’s go there…

Page 42: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection
Page 43: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Check Stormwater Management Criteria

If we haven’t completely satisfied the criteria, we may want to go back to the concept plan to apply additional low impact development practices to further reduce post-construction stormwater runoff rates, volumes, and pollutant loads…

Page 44: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection
Page 45: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Apply Stormwater Management Practices

If we determine that the criteria cannot be satisfied exclusively through the use of green infrastructure practices, the next step is to apply stormwater management practices to the site– Let’s try a stormwater pond to satisfy

the remainder of the criteria…

Page 46: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

PEACHTREE GLEN – INNOVATIVE DESIGN

Drugstore

Shops

SupermarketRestaurant

Shops

Shops

ConservationConservationAreaArea

ConservationConservationAreaArea

ConservationConservationAreaArea

ConservationConservationAreaArea

BioretentionBioretentionAreaArea

BioretentionBioretentionAreaArea

BioretentionBioretentionAreasAreas

BioretentionBioretentionAreasAreas

Area 14.7 acArea 14.7 ac

Area 21.5 acArea 21.5 ac Area 3

3.8 acArea 33.8 ac

3.9 ac3.9 ac

0 100 200

Overland Overland Flow AreaFlow AreaOverland Overland Flow AreaFlow Area 1.8 ac1.8 ac

StormwaterStormwaterPondPond

StormwaterStormwaterPondPond

Page 47: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Stormwater Pond

Page 48: Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection

Moving on to Final Design

Discuss concept plan with local development review authority

Further develop stormwater management plan

Include details about green infrastructure and stormwater management practice design