macroeconomic implications of financial constraints 1. credit crunch

19
MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch. 9th set of transparencies for ToCF

Upload: kaveri

Post on 12-Feb-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch. 9th set of transparencies for ToCF. INTRODUCTION. GREAT DEPRESSION. Irving Fisher ( EMA 1933): aggrevated by "poor performance" of financial markets. DEBT DEFLATION. Friedman-Schwartz (1963): role of money supply. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS

1. Credit crunch.

9th set of transparencies for ToCF

Page 2: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

2

INTRODUCTIONGREAT DEPRESSION

Irving Fisher (EMA 1933): aggrevated by "poor performance" of financial markets

DEBT DEFLATION

Bernanke (1983): breakdown in banking. Friedman-Schwartz (1963): role of money supply.

BALANCE SHEET CHANNEL vs

LENDING CHANNELTypical pattern:

Recession, high interest ratesweak balance sheets of firms

loan losses + low asset prices reduce equity in financial sector.

Two sectors (real + financial) are constrained.

Page 3: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

3

US 1990-91 recession (rather typical)

banks: reduction in capital ratio decline in bank lending

Same pattern in the wake of a tight money episode (Romer-Romer BPEA 1990).

Modeling : Apply logic of credit rationing to the two tiers.

flight to quality – credit crunch hits poor firms first– large/healthy firms can go to CP or bond markets.

Page 4: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

4

MODEL

Have 1 project / idea each

Moral hazard:

Risk neutral parties borrowers (firms) monitors (banks) investors

("firms")

return R

(success)

Investment costI

Verifiable 0

(failure)

(only good project is viable)

BORROWERS

good bad(low private

benefit)

Versions of the project

Bad (high private

benefit)

Private benefit:Prob( R)

Page 5: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

5

Have assets Cumulative distribution G(A).

("financial intermediaries", "banks")

can rule out high private benefit bad project of borrower at cost c (moral hazard).

uninformed / free riding (actually: implication of the model),

Exogenous interest rate:access to "storagefacility" yieldinginterest rate i.

Endogenous interest rate:savings.

demand expected return

MONITORS

INVESTORS

Total assets of intermediaries = Km.

Page 6: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

6

EXOGENOUS INTEREST RATE

Intermediation

Equilibrium

Page 7: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

7

Certification

Page 8: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

8

CertificationIntermediationVenture capitalist Lead investment bank Bankers acceptances(commercial paper)Partial securitization of a loan.

Bank loan(on balance sheet).

Page 9: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

9

Need

DIRECT FINANCE

where

Page 10: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

10

INDIRECT FINANCE

Page 11: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

11

Because firm wants to use as little informed capital as possible:

Firm gets financed if it has assets where

EQUILIBRIUM

is increasing in .

M:

Page 12: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

12

If interest rate is endogenous

Demand for uninformed capital:

Supply imperfectly elastic.

Page 13: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

13

COMPARATIVE STATICS3 types of recessions

Lending channel

Classical recession Balance

sheet channel

Correlation. Leads and lags

In the three types of capital squeeze, aggregate investment goes down and goes up.

Credit crunch Industrial recession Shortage of savings[Intermediaries] [Firms]

parameter of first order stochastic dominance

[Investors]

or

Page 14: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

14

[Empirical evidence.] Fact: small firms are prime victims of credit crunch.

CREDIT CRUNCH

Page 15: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

15

VARIABLE INVESTMENT SCALE

solvency ratio of banks (intermediation) increasesequity ratio of firms

A decrease in Km (credit crunch)

decreases increases decreases

Page 16: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

16

A decrease in Kb (balance sheet channel) decreases

decreases increases rm

decreases rb

Page 17: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

17

(1)

Description of equilibrium

(2)

(3)

inverse function of

Page 18: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

18

r increases with c

Intermediation (banks) vs certification (venture capital)

Banks have become low-intensity monitors over the years.

Certifiers have r = 1!

High monitoring intensity high solvency requirements.

Finance companies, firms themselves are higher- intensity monitors better capitalized.

Page 19: MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Credit crunch

19

OTHER RESEARCH PROJECTS

Division of labor between intermediaries and firms, among intermediaries:

shallow vs deep information.

Simultaneous growth of financial and real sectors.Dynamics:

Increasing share of financial sector. Move toward less intensive monitoring.

Certification vs intermediation.